Notebookcheck

使命召唤》先锋版性能分析

旧的弱点,新的优势。 与前辈们不同,《使命召唤先锋》试图做一些新的事情。我们进行了性能分析以确定系统要求。
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Gaming Laptop / Notebook Desktop Gamecheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
使命召唤先锋

技术

乍一看,《先锋》似乎有我们在以前的CoD游戏中看到的所有问题和难题--在游戏性和技术方面都是如此。重新开始后,纹理仍然需要一段时间来加载(有时需要几分钟才能加载所有高分辨率的资产)。这是很烦人的。连接到服务器也仍然需要一段时间。单人游戏模式再次充斥着人工智能的错误。

使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋

游戏的大小已经大大缩减,这是一个重大的积极因素。黑色行动冷战》占用了超过200GB的存储空间,而《先锋》只需要''65GB(安装了战区模式)。图形菜单已被重新设计。现在有专门的标签,这意味着玩家将不必像以前那样做大量的滚动。

最后,经过多年的批评,出现了图形预设。这为普通玩家节省了时间,也使基准测试更加容易。另一个主要的积极因素。图形更改不需要重新启动就能生效。

使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋

关于图形菜单,没有太多可批评的地方。有图片和文字说明,有助于阐明每个设置的作用。虽然游戏选项卡相对来说并不令人印象深刻,但显示选项卡包含所有常规设置(分辨率、帧速率限制器、HDR......)。

不过,质量选项卡是最重要的。它包含30多个设置。它们对视觉效果的影响差别很大。如果玩家愿意的话,他们有机会进行大量的修补工作。使命召唤先锋》支持DLSS和FidelityFX,但不支持光线追踪。

使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋

还有一个VRAM表,根据该表,游戏在1080p和低设置下需要至少2GB的VRAM,在中等设置下需要超过3GB的视频内存,在高/超设置下需要5GB的视频内存--与其他现代作品相比,既不多也不少。

在视觉上,《使命召唤先锋》取得了许多进步。植被密度、细节水平、(天气)效果、动画和人物模型都令人印象深刻。可破坏性是《使命召唤先锋》的另一个值得注意的元素(路障、墙壁等都可以被破坏)。总而言之,视觉效果可以说是好到非常好。

使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋

从游戏性来看,《使命召唤先锋》似乎是朝着正确的方向迈出了一步,至少在我们看来是这样。先锋》没有无休止的无脑枪战,而是提供了扣人心弦的视频序列、体面的叙事和人物发展,这对第一人称射击游戏来说是不寻常的。就像《战地》一样,《先锋》在运动中感觉很好。枪法也是一流的。

使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
使命召唤先锋
 

基准

由于性能上的巨大波动(取决于等级、NPC密度和屏幕上的效果数量),《使命召唤先锋》不容易设定基准。我们决定将我们的基准设定在被称为 "中途岛之战 "的任务的开始。我们50秒的基准序列发生在一艘航空母舰上(见下面的视频)。我们使用CapFrameX记录性能统计数据。

因为《使命召唤先锋》是一款第一人称射击游戏,它需要至少60FPS才能获得愉快的游戏体验。

结果

基准测试主要使用我们的合作伙伴MSI和XMG(Schenker Technologies)借给我们的笔记本电脑进行。

FHD (1920x1080)

要在1080p下运行CoD Vanguard,玩家至少需要一块中低端显卡。的水平的GPU。 GeForce GTX 1650(Ti)可以在低/中预设下处理这个标题。要想在高或超设置下获得体面的帧率,你需要一个拥有4GB以上VRAM的显卡(GeForce GTX 1660 TiRadeon RX 5600M).

Call of Duty Vanguard
    1920x1080 Low Preset     1920x1080 Medium Preset     1920x1080 High Preset     1920x1080 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X
194 (108min, 132P0.1, 149P1) fps ∼46%
188 (87.1min, 111P0.1, 132P1) fps ∼45%
185 (113min, 128P0.1, 144P1) fps ∼47%
174 (94.9min, 118P0.1, 136P1) fps ∼49%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
189 (98.1min, 118P0.1, 139P1) fps ∼45%
179 (103min, 117P0.1, 137P1) fps ∼43%
176 (89.1min, 105P0.1, 124P1) fps ∼45%
161 (68.8min, 98.2P0.1, 115P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
168 (88.2min, 116P0.1, 134P1) fps ∼40%
157 (100min, 116P0.1, 126P1) fps ∼38%
144 (90.8min, 103P0.1, 111P1) fps ∼36%
131 (68min, 95.5P0.1, 104P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
149 (109min, 112P0.1, 122P1) fps ∼36%
138 (93.5min, 106P0.1, 116P1) fps ∼33%
118 (72.7min, 86.3P0.1, 93.7P1) fps ∼30%
107 (69.1min, 81P0.1, 86.1P1) fps ∼30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP
144 (58.7min, 100P0.1, 118P1) fps ∼34%
136 (78.3min, 98.9P0.1, 110P1) fps ∼33%
125 (70.5min, 90.9P0.1, 101P1) fps ∼32%
114 (44min, 82.9P0.1, 93.6P1) fps ∼32%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
132 (73min, 80P0.1, 98.1P1) fps ∼32%
121 (62.8min, 73.4P0.1, 93P1) fps ∼29%
99.3 (49.6min, 70.2P0.1, 77.5P1) fps ∼25%
89.8 (59.2min, 65.1P0.1, 71.2P1) fps ∼26%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP
98.5 (60.5min, 74.8P0.1, 78.6P1) fps ∼24%
89.4 (65.8min, 73.6P0.1, 77.1P1) fps ∼21%
58.2 (25.3min, 43.2P0.1, 45.7P1) fps ∼15%
53.4 (38.9min, 40.3P0.1, 42P1) fps ∼15%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
Dell G5 15 SE
88.5 (56.7min, 65.4P0.1, 70.2P1) fps ∼21%
81.8 (29.5min, 59.1P0.1, 64.5P1) fps ∼20%
69.4 (19.8min, 51.6P0.1, 56.8P1) fps ∼18%
64.2 (36min, 47.5P0.1, 51.5P1) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
76.6 (23.3min, 24.1P0.1, 26.3P1) fps ∼18%
72.9 (24.3min, 25.1P0.1, 27.1P1) fps ∼18%
59.7 (24.3min, 26P0.1, 30.1P1) fps ∼15%
55.8 (23.6min, 25.1P0.1, 30P1) fps ∼16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GP75
70.6 (56.6min, 57.3P0.1, 59.1P1) fps ∼17%
66.1 (46.4min, 54.2P0.1, 55.9P1) fps ∼16%
44.8 (31.4min, 34.4P0.1, 36.2P1) fps ∼11%
41.9 (30.8min, 33.4P0.1, 35.3P1) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GL75
64.5 (40min, 52P0.1, 55.2P1) fps ∼15%
59.8 (40.1min, 46.7P0.1, 50P1) fps ∼14%
33.9 (22.9min, 23.5P0.1, 24.7P1) fps ∼9%
33.4 (19min, 23.1P0.1, 24.9P1) fps ∼9%

QHD (2560x1440)

在1440p和高设置下,可播放的帧率可以通过高端GPU实现,如 GeForce RTX 3060.

Call of Duty Vanguard
    2560x1440 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X
138 (86.7min, 99P0.1, 110P1) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
126 (84.8min, 90.5P0.1, 98.8P1) fps ∼41%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
98.1 (68.9min, 74.6P0.1, 81P1) fps ∼32%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP
83.5 (61.1min, 66.4P0.1, 71P1) fps ∼27%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
77.7 (56.4min, 60.7P0.1, 65.2P1) fps ∼25%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
63.2 (2.32min, 50.4P0.1, 52.7P1) fps ∼20%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
Dell G5 15 SE
45.1 (22.8min, 34.1P0.1, 36.5P1) fps ∼15%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
42.2 (24.8min, 27.4P0.1, 32.1P1) fps ∼14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GP75
28 (23.4min, 23.7P0.1, 24P1) fps ∼9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GL75
23.3 (16.8min, 17.2P0.1, 17.5P1) fps ∼8%

UHD (3840x2160)

在4K时,最强大的笔记本GPU达到了它们的极限。即使是The GeForce RTX 3080 (Mobile)也无法突破60FPS的大关。桌面显卡的情况要好得多,因为它们的TGPs要高得多。

Call of Duty Vanguard
    3840x2160 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X
84.8 (53.3min, 69P0.1, 72.9P1) fps ∼35%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
77.7 (43.8min, 60.5P0.1, 65.7P1) fps ∼32%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
56.8 (46.7min, 48P0.1, 50.1P1) fps ∼24%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP
48.1 (37.3min, 41.1P0.1, 43P1) fps ∼20%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
43.8 (37.2min, 37.9P0.1, 39.2P1) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
34.4 (28.3min, 29.1P0.1, 30.2P1) fps ∼14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
22 (14.6min, 15.7P0.1, 17.3P1) fps ∼9%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
Dell G5 15 SE
21.8 (9.21min, 15.1P0.1, 17.2P1) fps ∼9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GP75
14.4 (11.2min, 11.3P0.1, 11.7P1) fps ∼6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GL75
12.6 (5.13min, 5.29P0.1, 9.71P1) fps ∼5%

注意事项

由于对视频游戏进行基准测试非常耗时,而且经常受到安装/激活限制的制约,在发布时,我们只能提供《使命召唤先锋》的部分性能分析。其他显卡将在未来几天和几周内加入。

Overview

Show Restrictions
PosModel< PrevNext >Call of Duty Vanguard
 Call of Duty Vanguard (2021)
low
1280x720
Low Preset
med.
1920x1080
Medium Preset
high
1920x1080
High Preset
ultra
1920x1080
Ultra Preset
QHD
2560x1440
Ultra Preset
4K
3840x2160
Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
188
185
174
138
84.8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
179
176
161
126
77.7
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
137
167
145
90.2n2
94
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
157
144
131
98.1
56.8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
136
125
114
83.5
48.1
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
125
139
115
102
71.1
36.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
138
118
107
77.7
43.8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
102
113
96.3
86.8
62.2
35.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)
106
119
102
92.2
67.6
38.8
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)
95.1
126
110
101
71.7
37.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
121
99.3
89.8
63.2
34.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)
102
109
90.3
82
59.2
33.3
AMD Radeon RX 6600
121
125
97.6
87
59.5
28.8
AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)
82.9
110
97.2
91
63.8
34.2
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)
81.8
104
91.1
84.4
58.6
30.4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)
92.2
85.7
67.4
53.5
38.7
21.9
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)
76.6
84.1
61.1
57.5
38.9
20.7
AMD Radeon RX 5600M
81.8
69.4
64.2
45.1
21.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
72.9
59.7
55.8
42.2
22
PosModel< PrevNext >Call of Duty Vanguard
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
89.4
58.2
53.4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)
89.8
80.5
62.7
55.8
40.1
21.6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
66.1
44.8
41.9
28
14.4
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
43.1
21.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
59.8
33.9
33.4
23.3
12.6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
25.3
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Test Systems


设备
GPU CPU RAM 操作系统
XMG Neo 15 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 @165 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Neo 17 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Core 15 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 @130 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Focus 17 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti @75 W TGP (4 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
微星GP65 NvidiaGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-9750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64位
微星GP75 NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650 Ti (4 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-10750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64位
微星GL75 NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-10750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64位
戴尔G5 15 SE AMD Radeon RX 5600M (6 GB GDDR6) AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64位
微星 Prestige 14 Evo Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs) Intel Core i7-1185G7 1 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
华硕ROG Strix G15 AMD Radeon RX 6800M (12 GB GDDR6) AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64位
台式电脑 I MSIGeForce RTX 3090 (24 GB GDDR6X)
MSIGeForce RTX 3080 (10 GB GDDR6X)
MSIGeForce RTX 3070 (8 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-9900K 4 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64位
Desktop PC II NvidiaGeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X)
NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 (12 GB GDDR6X)
Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6)
NvidiaGeForce RTX 2070 Super (8GB GDDR6)
NvidiaGeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6)
KFA2GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6 GB GDDR6)
PNYGeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5)
KFA2GeForce GTX 1650 Super (4 GB GDDR6)
KFA2GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (12 GB DDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 2 x 32 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
4K显示器 Nvidia驱动程序 AMD驱动程序
华硕PB287Q,飞利浦Brilliance 329P9H, Acer Predator XB321HK ForceWare 496.49 Adrenalin 21.11.1
Stanislav Kokhanyuk
Editor of the original article: Stanislav Kokhanyuk - Translator - 68 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2021
Ninh Duy
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 207612 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 使命召唤》先锋版性能分析
Florian Glaser, 2021-11-12 (Update: 2021-11-12)