Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A54 5G评测 - 一款强大的中端智能手机,有很多升级的地方

真的很厉害吗? Galaxy A54 5G是三星中档设备的海报儿童。我们的评论强调了对去年机型的升级,特别是SoC、显示屏亮度、主摄像头的新传感器以及eSIM支持。这款智能手机的设计也进行了大修,让人想起了Galaxy S系列。
5G Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)

Galaxy A54 5G是三星2023年中档机型的先锋,是A53 5G的直接继承者。 Galaxy A53 5G.与高端系列不同,制造商仍然致力于自己的处理器,并选择了新的Exynos 1380,现在有更多的内存可供支配。相机方面也发生了很多事情:深度相机没有了,A54收到了一个5000万像素的传感器,而不是6400万像素的,这应该导致在光线不足的情况下有更好的图像。

存储配置几乎相同;唯一的区别是,128GB和256GB型号有8GB的内存可供支配。不幸的是,一切都更加昂贵。小机型现在的价格是449美元(零售价,+30美元),大机型是499美元(+20美元)。

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Processor
Samsung Exynos 1380 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G68 MP5, Core: 950 MHz
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.40 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitive, 10 multi touch points, 240 Hz touch sampling rate, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 100 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Gyroscope, Orientation
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 158.2 x 76.7
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, OIS) + 12 MPix (ultra wide, f/2.2) + 5 MPix (Macro, f/2.4); Camera2 API level: limited
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, One UI 5.1, 24 Months Warranty, Hybrid SIM, eSIM, IP67, DRM Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1), fanless, waterproof
Weight
202 g
Price
489 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
05/2023
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5
202 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2340x1080
86.4 %
04/2023
Xiaomi 13 Lite
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644
171 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
86.1 %
04/2022
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
144 g64 GB SSD4.70"1334x750
85.8 %
09/2022
Google Pixel 6a
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20
178 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
82.9 %
09/2022
Sony Xperia 10 IV
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
161 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.00"2520x1080
Galaxy A54的卡槽不能与设备齐平。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
Galaxy A54的卡槽不能与设备齐平。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)

在视觉上,三星Galaxy A54 5G让人想起了 Galaxy S23+但是,在83%的比例下,它的显示屏与机身的比例更差。这款三星智能手机有令人敬畏的青柠色、黑色、紫色和白色,我们的评测模型是紫色版本。

Galaxy A54有一个重点颜色的铝制框架,设备的正面和背面都有康宁大猩猩5号玻璃保护。 相机的三个镜头突出了2.1毫米,导致智能手机在平面上摇晃得相当厉害。然而,这可以通过使用一个可选的保护壳来弥补。

试图扭转Galaxy A54 5G时遇到阻力,只能听到轻微的吱吱声。由于采用了AMOLED技术,显示屏对压力不会过于敏感,因此,在用力按压面板时,看不到任何波纹。该机的制造质量给我们留下了深刻印象,其特点是紧密、平滑的配合和完成。只有卡槽的盖子没有完全平齐,在我们评测模型的左侧伸出了一点。否则,A54给人以非常高级的印象。

三星智能手机的电池被牢牢地安装在设备内部,使其无法被用户调换。由于通过了IP67认证,灰尘和水的入侵被阻止了。但是,在可持续性方面,三星必须承担责任,因为该智能手机不仅有塑料薄膜覆盖边框,而且还被包裹在透明塑料薄膜中。这肯定也会通过使用更少的资源来实现。

(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)

尺寸比较

159.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.1 mm 189 g159.2 mm 72.7 mm 7.23 mm 171 g158.2 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 202 g153 mm 67 mm 8.3 mm 161 g152.2 mm 71.8 mm 8.9 mm 178 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 144 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

特点 -Galaxy A54 5G有一个快速的microSD插槽

三星Galaxy A54 5G可能没有3.5毫米耳机插孔,因为这项工作由USB-C端口管理,但要使用合适的适配器。当然,USB耳机不需要这个。数据传输通过USB 2.0进行,然而,通过该端口进行有线视频输出是不可能的。同样,也支持OTG,这意味着可以连接外围设备和外部存储媒体。在测试中,我们用一个外部固态硬盘进行了尝试,但不幸的是,A54告诉我们需要一个外部电源。智能手机本身不能提供足够的电力。然而,一个U盘并不是问题。

蓝牙已经升级到最新的5.3版本,而且还搭载了一个NFC芯片。

顶部:卡槽,麦克风(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
顶部:卡槽,麦克风(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
左图: (照片: Daniel Schmidt)
左图: (照片: Daniel Schmidt)
右边:音量、功能键(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
右边:音量、功能键(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
底部:扬声器、话筒、USB、麦克风(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。
底部:扬声器、话筒、USB、麦克风(照片:Daniel Schmidt)。

微型SD卡读卡器

在这个价格类别中,microSD卡插槽实际上不再是强制性的,这意味着A54拥有一个更好的插槽。此外,我们正在处理一个相对较快的卡,它不仅因其持续的高数据速度而给我们留下深刻印象,而且由于拥有exFAT文件系统。

一个小的缺点是,这是一个混合插槽。这意味着用户可能不得不在存储卡和物理SIM卡之间做出决定。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
57.33 MB/s
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
21.49 MB/s -63%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
10.9 MB/s -81%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.4 (32.1-55.6)
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.4 (25.8-42.5)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.6 (43.7-98)
Sony Xperia 10 IV Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.1 (41.6-84)

软件 -Galaxy A54 5G甚至会得到Android 17

三星Galaxy A54 5G配备了谷歌Android 13,以及其内部UI One 5.1。就像昂贵的高端智能手机一样,该设备将收到四个主要的Android 更新和五年的安全补丁(截至该智能手机的发布日期)。在测试时,这些都是最新的,截至2023年4月1日。在前四年中,每月都会分发补丁,到了最后一年将改为每季度一次。

除了谷歌的应用程序外,各种三星应用程序也被预装,包括Galaxy Store。第三方产品,如Spotify、Netflix、Meta和微软也可使用,但并非所有这些都能完全卸载,有些只能停用。

通信和GNSS - 现在有Wi-Fi 6

当涉及到移动连接时,Galaxy A54与其前身相比几乎完全没有变化。只增加了一个5G频段,在良好的覆盖下,在许多非欧洲国家连接到网络应该没有任何问题。

在Wi-Fi方面,有一个重大更新,因为三星智能手机现在也终于支持带有VHT80的Wi-Fi 6。这确保了高数据传输率,尽管在发送数据时,我们结合我们的参考路由器--华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,测量到数据传输速度暂时下降。然而,在实践中,这应该是不明显的。小米13 Lite小米13 Lite甚至更快,实际上是两倍,由于VHT160,但同样无法利用6GHz网络。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1440 (1312min - 1540max) MBit/s +71%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
897 (449min - 907max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
843 (813min - 856max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
746 (599min - 768max) MBit/s -12%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
690 (674min - 705max) MBit/s -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=211, last 2 years)
651 MBit/s -23%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (328min - 351max) MBit/s -59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1757 (1611min - 1817max) MBit/s +134%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (459min - 973max) MBit/s +26%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
888 (869min - 906max) MBit/s +18%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
750 (546min - 831max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
715 (357min - 729max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=212, last 2 years)
687 MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269 (255min - 281max) MBit/s -64%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø842 (813-856)
Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø689 (674-705)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (546-831)
Sony Xperia 10 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø703 (357-729)
GPS测试:在室内
在室内
GPS测试:室外
户外活动
GPS测试:支持的GNSS
全球导航卫星系统

即使在室内,三星Galaxy A54 5G也能快速、准确地进行卫星定位。在户外,这也是以模范的精度进行的。这款三星智能手机支持大多数常见的卫星系统,尽管大多只有一个频段。

在一次短暂的自行车旅行中,我们将A54与Garmin Venu 2.在整个行程中,测量了近十公里,覆盖的距离只有十米之差。扫了一眼路线细节,也证实了A54 5G的精确度与Garmin的健身智能手表相似,使其完全适用于基于位置的任务。

全球卫星导航系统测试之旅:环湖航行
全球卫星导航系统测试之旅:环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统之旅:转折点
全球导航卫星系统之旅:转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:总结
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:总结

电话功能和通话质量

电话应用
Bixby短信呼叫

Galaxy A54 5G是Samsungs中档手机中第一款拥有eSIM的智能手机。这意味着,即使microSD卡占据了第二个物理nano-SIM卡槽,也可以实现双SIM卡功能。然而,诸如SIP账户管理等功能并没有被整合到系统中。

将设备放在耳边,我们对通话质量印象非常深刻。通讯在两端都非常自然,噪音消除功能可以过滤掉任何不需要的噪音来源。在扬声器模式下,混响几乎完全没有,麦克风能够从两米远的地方清晰地捕捉到声音。

照相机 -Galaxy A54配备了良好的三摄系统

与Galaxy A54自拍
与Galaxy A54自拍

在前置摄像头方面,纸面上没有任何变化。再一次,三星选择了一个32MP的镜头,使用像素分档。这意味着它可以捕获800万像素的图像。在良好的照明条件下,质量非常好,由于平衡的色彩和适当的细节水平,给我们留下了深刻印象。视频可以以30fps的速度录制为超高清。

在设备的后部,深度摄像头已经被移除,64MP的传感器被发现在Galaxy A53必须为新的5000万像素传感器让路。这应该能提供更好的结果,特别是在光线不足的情况下,它也有光学图像稳定功能(OIS)可供支配。正如预期的那样,三星在这个传感器上使用了像素分选,因此最终的图像大小为12.5MP。然而,也可以使用全分辨率。以下的长宽比是可用的:4:3, 16:9, 和1:1。

微距镜头捕捉
微距镜头捕捉

在测试中,A54的主摄像头的质量令人印象深刻,提供了令人愉悦的日光照片。可以看到略带红色的色调,但只有在最大放大率和直接比较时才会出现。此外,景深有些模糊。在我们的竞争对手中, 像素6a在这方面处理得更好。在低光下,与前代产品相比,结果的对比度更加丰富,但似乎经过了大量的后期处理。尽管如此,主体的平衡光线分布还是令人印象深刻。

超广角镜头能够进行体面的整体构图,但即使只是稍微放大,低分辨率也很明显。细节和清晰的轮廓缺失,尤其是在涉及到深度时。同样,这也适用于微距镜头。放大只能通过数字方式进行。尽管如此,10倍变焦是可能的,尽管其质量还有待提高。即使在5倍变焦时,也存在许多色差。

在最好的情况下,视频可以用主摄像头以30fps的速度录制成超高清。另外,也可以使用高达60fps的全高清。任何希望使用超级防抖的 人都会发现他们甚至被限制在30fps的1080p。数字视频稳定(VDIS)以833赫兹运行,这样做比Galaxy A34 5G (500赫兹)的产品更强大。显然,这有助于抵消运动造成的模糊和失真,主要是通过提高快门速度实现的。遗憾的是,普通的帧率,如24fps不能在应用程序中选择。同样,21:9的格式也无法使用。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light

在大多数情况下,Galaxy A54 5G的主摄像头大多表现出令人印象深刻的成像性能,在可控的照明条件下。红色的色调甚至不明显,ColorChecker护照上的颜色再现得相当好。只有深绿色被提亮太多,达到了20的DeltaE。

图像中央的测试图被相机捕捉到了很好的细节,然而,在户外,很快就会出现模糊现象。

ColorChecker
8.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
20 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A54 5G: 7.78 ∆E min: 2.02 - max: 20.02 ∆E
ColorChecker
22.2 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
44 ∆E
47 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
40 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A54 5G: 32 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 47.02 ∆E

特点和保证--大部分是可选的

Galaxy A54型车有少量的额外费用 (照片: Daniel Schmidt)
Galaxy A54,有适度的额外费用

三星Galaxy A54 5G拥有24个月的制造商保证,并可以延长到包括Care+保险套餐。这可以预订一年或两年,此外,它还可以包括盗窃保险。根据所选择的套餐,价格在49美元至149美元之间。每年最多可以进行两次损坏索赔,为此需要支付49美元或99美元(盗窃)的额外服务费。选择A54企业版的人,除其他事项外,还可获得一年的额外保证。

开箱后,该设备只配备了一条USB线以及一个用于打开卡槽的小工具。三星和其他第三方供应商可以提供可选的配件。

输入设备和操作 - 配有显示屏内光学指纹传感器

三星在出厂时并没有在显示屏上直接贴上屏幕保护膜。康宁大猩猩5号玻璃触感光滑,Galaxy A54的电容式触摸屏对输入有精确的反应。

显示屏内的光学指纹传感器负责生物识别安全,虽然它能可靠地识别用户保存的数字,但我们希望它能更快一点。作为选择或补充,前置摄像头可用于面部识别。然而,这速度更快,但安全性稍差。

再一次,功能或电源按钮已被预先分配给三星的Bixby助手。这可以被关闭,并在设置中返回到经典选项。除此之外,该按钮可以被定制,以便双击按钮可以打开相机或任何其他指定的应用程序。

Galaxy A54的振动马达工作起来非常安静,并有细腻的触觉反馈,这是我们非常欣赏的。振动强度也可以在设置中进行自定义。

 

显示屏 - 一个极其明亮的120赫兹超级AMOLED显示屏

子像素结构
子像素结构
在黑暗中的最低显示亮度下: Honor Magic5 Pro (2160 Hz PWM调光) vsGalaxy A54 (右)
与Magic5 Pro的PWM比较

三星Galaxy A54 5G拥有一个6.4英寸,FullHD+,Super AMOLED面板,运行频率高达120 Hz。动态自适应刷新率被限制在60和120赫兹之间自动切换。另外,这也可以被设置为固定的60赫兹。该智能手机支持HLG、HDR10+以及HDR10等HDR标准。同样,也可以配置一个永远在线的显示器。

与去年的A53相比,亮度有了很大的提高。Galaxy A53.在纯白显示和环境光传感器激活的情况下,A54的面板达到了935cd/m²的平均亮度,并且被照得非常均匀。在光区和暗区平均分配的情况下(APL18),我们能够测量到1390cd/m²的峰值亮度。设置为手动,可以达到433 cd/m²。

在最低显示亮度下,出现了120至253赫兹之间的不规则显示闪烁,这可能会导致眼睛疲劳。然而,如果只将亮度提高到最低限度,面板就会切换到240赫兹的非常一致的周期性曲线,这对眼睛来说应该是非常容易的。与Magic5 Pro 的PWM比较(见照片)表明,在最低亮度设置下,Galaxy A54没有实施任何明显的直流调光技术,以保护用户的眼睛。

932
cd/m²
940
cd/m²
931
cd/m²
932
cd/m²
940
cd/m²
932
cd/m²
939
cd/m²
936
cd/m²
931
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 940 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 934.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.99 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 940 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.05
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40
Xiaomi 13 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Apple iPhone SE 2022
IPS, 1334x750, 4.70
Google Pixel 6a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10
Sony Xperia 10 IV
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.00
Samsung Galaxy A53
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
10%
-9%
11%
13%
-7%
Brightness middle
940
905
-4%
662
-30%
758
-19%
572
-39%
718
-24%
Brightness
935
904
-3%
647
-31%
767
-18%
580
-38%
730
-22%
Brightness Distribution
99
99
0%
92
-7%
93
-6%
96
-3%
92
-7%
Black Level *
0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.4
1
58%
1.44
40%
0.9
62%
0.9
62%
1.62
32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.2
3
6%
4.74
-48%
2.5
22%
1.2
62%
4.21
-32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
2.2
-0%
1.7
23%
1.6
27%
1.4
36%
2
9%
Gamma
2.05 107%
2.23 99%
2.179 101%
2.2 100%
2.29 96%
2.156 102%
CCT
6422 101%
6382 102%
6746 96%
6599 98%
6614 98%
6545 99%
Contrast
1655

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 253 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 253 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 253 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
闵行区。
25%的显示亮度
25 %
50 %的显示亮度
50 %
75%的显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

一系列的测量,有固定的变焦水平和各种亮度设置

Galaxy A54的面板在选择自然显示模式时实现了最自然的色彩再现。然而,该面板随后选择了较小的sRGB色彩空间。在鲜艳模式预设中,尽管使用了较大的DCI P3色彩空间,但图像显得更冷,色彩的饱和度似乎略低。

Pixel 6a和Xperia 10 IV能够更准确地显示灰度和颜色,尽管我们怀疑肉眼是否能看到这一点。

灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.874 ms rise
↘ 0.791 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.775 ms rise
↘ 0.7755 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在户外,三星Galaxy A54 5G的表现令人印象深刻,由于其高亮度,即使在晴天也能保持轻松的可读性。最多,反射可以说是有点烦人。

在这个类别中, 小米13 Lite摩托罗拉Edge 30 Fusion获得了类似的亮度。

(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)

Galaxy A54的视角稳定性非常好,从广角观看时,只出现了极小的亮度下降,没有任何倒色。只有可见的绿色光泽,但这在许多OLED中是很常见的。

三星Galaxy A54 5G的可视角度稳定性
三星Galaxy A54 5G的可视角度稳定性

性能--由于新的Exynos 1380,只有很小的好处

Galaxy A54 5G已经采用了其内部的 三星Exynos 1380芯片组,配备8GB的LPDDR4x内存。该SoC与它的前代产品非常相似,即 Exynos 1280例如,它可以在Galaxy A53中找到。然而,三星已经重新组织了两个集群:两个节能核心已被删除,取而代之的是两个额外的Cortex-A78核心,有望提升性能。

在Geekbench 5.4中,由于几乎相同的时钟速度,CPU的单核性能处于类似水平,但多核性能有高达50%的提升。值得注意的是,Exynos 1380的性能也超过了骁龙7代中发现的 小米13 Lite.然而,与A54相比,A54没有机会。 像素6a's 张力.

在系统基准测试领域也是如此,三星智能手机只在PCMark中设法上升到顶端。在日常使用中,Galaxy A54因其普遍的流畅性能而给人留下深刻印象,尽管这并不是没有出现偶尔的卡顿。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1741 Points +122%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1025 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points +16%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
791 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
783 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (771 - 788, n=5)
781 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
740 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
670 Points -14%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
4788 Points +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points +6%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
2940 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2894 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
2817 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (2719 - 2817, n=5)
2761 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1909 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1878 Points -33%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)
1279 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
1006 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  ()
1006 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
934 Points -7%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)
3412 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
2828 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  ()
2828 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2571 Points -9%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points +46%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
733484 Points +45%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
715338 Points +41%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
581838 Points +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (505141 - 518476, n=4)
510383 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
507481 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
409976 Points -19%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
386185 Points -24%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
13024 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (11259 - 13488, n=5)
12568 Points -4%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
11890 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11470 Points -12%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9717 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6897 Points -47%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1132 Points +61%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
865 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
703 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (637 - 703, n=5)
665 Points -5%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
662 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
579 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
574 Points -18%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
5950 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4666 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4539 Points -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (4416 - 4666, n=5)
4501 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3721 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3626 Points -22%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +8%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9109 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
8961 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (8843 - 9016, n=5)
8932 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
8797 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8043 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7157 Points -20%
Memory
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
6592 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4857 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (4301 - 4857, n=5)
4607 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4580 Points -6%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4385 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3855 Points -21%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +100%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
14148 Points +99%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7612 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
7108 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (7031 - 7126, n=5)
7072 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5178 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4421 Points -38%
Web
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
1533 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1476 Points -4%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1445 Points -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (1334 - 1533, n=5)
1409 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1210 Points -21%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1178 Points -23%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
29413 Points +404%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points +274%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
21639 Points +271%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9348 Points +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (5835 - 6152, n=5)
6012 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
5835 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4239 Points -27%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
44527 Points +7059%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points +2767%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
622 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
  (545 - 647, n=5)
605 Points -3%

三星还对图形芯片进行了微调,甚至给了 Exynos 1280's 马里-G68 MP4一个额外的核心。根据数学规则(基准测试也证实了这一点),ARM Mali-G68 MP5的性能是很好的。ARM Mali-G68 MP5享有比前代产品高25%至30%的性能提升。虽然,这还不足以超越 Adreno 644中发现的小米13 Lite.该芯片的速度增加了23%。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
1877 Points +135%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points +104%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
829 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
799 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
621 Points -22%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
355 Points -56%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
2399 Points +195%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2040 Points +151%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
838 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
813 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
636 Points -22%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
361 Points -56%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
8909 Points +212%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7261 Points +155%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3035 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2853 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points -20%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1208 Points -58%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
8357 Points +196%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6695 Points +137%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3095 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2826 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2293 Points -19%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1212 Points -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4277 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4227 Points
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3510 Points -17%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3325 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3097 Points -27%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8957 Points +75%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6767 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5129 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3982 Points -22%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2990 Points -42%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7205 Points +47%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5501 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4897 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3746 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3092 Points -37%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
113 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps -14%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps -36%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps -36%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
358 fps +201%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
252 fps +112%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
147 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
119 fps
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
95 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
92 fps -23%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
76 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps -13%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps -19%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
39 fps -43%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
187 fps +134%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps +89%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
80 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps -24%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
48 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +28%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +28%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps -26%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps -45%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps +92%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps +21%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps -27%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps -33%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +131%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +108%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps -23%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps -38%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
82 fps +165%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +68%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -26%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps -35%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +200%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps +95%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps -25%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11 fps -45%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
39 fps +200%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps +115%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps -23%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.2 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +100%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +43%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -23%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
95.9 fps +182%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +71%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps -24%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -32%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps +137%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.3 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3.6 fps -39%

Basemark GPU score

0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø9.53 (5.67-147.9)
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø9.82 (5.55-114.2)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø13.7 (6.94-209)
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø12.8 (7.81-120.3)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø4.13 (1.62-7.77)
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.1: Ø3.52 (2.71-5.45)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø5.81 (1.982-11.9)
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.1: Ø4.65 (3.61-10.5)

在网上冲浪时,Galaxy A54的速度非常快,并设法超过了稍快的 Pixel 6a在WebXPRT 4、Mozilla Kraken和Octane 2.0中的表现。在日常使用中,冲浪速度也同样令人印象深刻。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
182.6 Points +93%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (94.6 - 119.6, n=5)
107.2 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
94.611 Points
Google Pixel 6a (Firefox 1ß4-2-ß)
75.261 Points -20%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
74.161 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
63.5 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
57.351 Points -39%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chome 99)
239 runs/min +239%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +52%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
90.4 runs/min +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (70.5 - 104, n=4)
86.7 runs/min +23%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
70.5 runs/min
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
67.2 runs/min -5%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)
51.24 runs/min -27%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
46.2 runs/min -34%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (97 - 123, n=5)
109.6 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
97 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
79 Points -19%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
72 Points -26%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
59 Points -39%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
65969 Points +95%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (33801 - 36155, n=5)
35093 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
33801 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points -1%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
33046 Points -2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
27804 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
24159 Points -29%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
21839 Points -35%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
1981.7 ms * -64%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
1920.3 ms * -59%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -32%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
1531.6 ms * -27%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
1384.1 ms * -15%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
1208.8 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (1099 - 1209, n=5)
1159 ms * +4%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
497.2 ms * +59%

* ... smaller is better

在我们的Galaxy A53评论中,存储速度慢已经是一个批评点。不幸的是,Galaxy A54也是如此,它选择了稍快的UFS 2.2存储。在 小米13 Lite的速度甚至高达160%。特别是,小数据块的写入速度非常慢。

Samsung Galaxy A54 5GXiaomi 13 LiteGoogle Pixel 6aSony Xperia 10 IVSamsung Galaxy A53Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
149%
119%
45%
60%
56%
177%
Sequential Read 256KB
528.32
1001.82
90%
1312.64
148%
521.1
-1%
510.1
-3%
Sequential Write 256KB
335.39
871.96
160%
712.94
113%
497.61
48%
486.7
45%
Random Read 4KB
236.23
277.33
17%
219.53
-7%
192.5
-19%
229.9
-3%
188.9 ?(89.3 - 297, n=62)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
70.52
301.41
327%
225.61
220%
177.83
152%
210.8
199%
180.6 ?(62.6 - 419, n=62)
156%

游戏--Galaxy 智能手机的乐趣因素有限

得益于其中档的 芯片,三星 A54 5GSoC,三星Galaxy A54 5G的计算能力足以应付大多数游戏。在我们的测试中,一些选定的游戏显示,它也足以满足图形要求的游戏,但有时会降低细节和帧率,如果这些还没有受到智能手机的限制。

在最好的情况下,射击游戏《PUBG》可以在高清设置下运行,而且不高于30fps,即使细节再次减少。 暗黑破坏神》以更高的帧率运行,但不是在最高的细节设置下。我们的测试设置在低图形细节下运行,仍然显示偶尔的掉帧。

Galaxy A54在《元神冲击》中几乎达到了它的极限。在中等和高细节设置下进行游戏并不有趣,即使在最低的图形设置下,帧率也会不时地出现停顿。然而,有了Game Launcher和Booster这两个有用的工具,我们知道从Galaxy S23上的有用工具。

在高要求的游戏之外,A54仍然是令人愉快的,这主要得益于非常好的显示屏和体面的双扬声器。

暗黑破坏神不朽
暗黑破坏神不朽
玄心冲击(最低设置)
玄信影响
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
游戏助推器菜单
游戏助推器菜单
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 3.6.0_13833164_13951843: Ø56.7 (31-61)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 3.6.0_13833164_13951843: Ø43.1 (26-58)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 3.6.0_13833164_13951843: Ø36.5 (23-53)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.5.0: Ø30 (29-31)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.5.0: Ø30 (29-31)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.5.0: Ø30 (29-31)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G; Diablo Immortal; 1.8.0: Ø55.5 (39-61)

Emissions -Galaxy A54 5G的双扬声器

温度

当空闲运行时,Galaxy A54的表面温度保持令人愉快的低水平,但在负载下明显增加,可达到37.6℃。考虑到中端SoC,这令人惊讶地高,但没有任何问题。

在内部,热量被成功地散发出来,因为在3DMark Wild Life压力测试中都没有节流现象。这看起来与可能有更好装备的像素6a尽管在性能上有很大的损失,但在负载下仍然明显更快。

Max. Load
 36.5 °C36.3 °C31.4 °C 
 37.1 °C37.4 °C33.3 °C 
 36.5 °C37.3 °C31.9 °C 
Maximum: 37.4 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
31.5 °C35.1 °C36.1 °C
31.2 °C33.2 °C37.6 °C
30.5 °C33.8 °C37 °C
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 34 °C
Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 %
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
79.5 % -20%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42.9 % -57%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 %
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.9 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.8 % -2%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
61.4 % -38%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49.2 % -51%
0510152025303540Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.85 (4.84-4.87)
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.52 (6.17-12.6)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø16.9 (16.8-17)
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.7 (17.4-40.5)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø17 (17-17.1)

发言人

三星Galaxy A54有体面的双扬声器供其使用。然而,它们的声音比任何Galaxy S系列都要差。Precision ,在高声部和特别是低声部都缺少。即使在中等音量下,它们听起来也有回声和空洞。

有线耳机或外部扬声器可以通过USB-C端口连接。蓝牙5.3提供了一个无线选项,但只有SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC和SSC音频编解码。任何希望同时为两个蓝牙接收器提供声音(双音频)的人,都必须用SBC来实现。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.638.6253029.73124.525.24025.826.75037.537.96325.228.18020.222.910020.43012517.543.116014.453.920014.351.425015.256.331511.957.940013.560.650012.163.563012.459.780011.765.3100011.872125011.475.9160012.376.3200012.276.3250012.178.3315012.277400012.980500013.479.8630013.277.7800012.977.91000013.675.21250013.466.11600013.264.9SPL24.888.7N0.673.3median 12.9median 72Delta0.99.34342.930.440.723.223.623.325.136.433.124.12520.325.717.628.115.742.713.854.516.255.915.156.812.658.513.161.113.168.412.772.114.775.813.475.412.873.912.874.312.874.713.276.913.77613.980.513.177.313.971.213.366.61469.714.26813.65525.687.40.770.9median 13.6median 70.90.98.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A54 5GGoogle Pixel 6a
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 6a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 5,000毫安时,有更好的运行时间

消耗功率

Galaxy A54的功耗可以说是经济的,但在空闲时,它略高于 A53.不太令人惊讶的是,在全负荷以及使用自适应显示亮度的测试中也是如此。

A54支持高达25瓦的快速充电。我们使用三星提供的合适的电源适配器检查了这一点。电池充满电需要将近一个半小时。27分钟后,电源存储是半满。49分钟后达到80%的标记,58分钟后达到90%的标记。A54需要漫长的27分钟来完成最后的10%--并不完全是快速。这款三星智能手机不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.11 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.75 / 1.51 / 1.62 Watt
Load midlight 4.91 / 8.93 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 13 Lite
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2022
2018 mAh
Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 IV
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
9%
2%
0%
17%
-1%
-72%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
0.75
0.74
1%
0.6
20%
0.68
9%
0.68
9%
0.9
-20%
1.068 ?(0.75 - 1.37, n=5)
-42%
Idle Average *
1.51
1.56
-3%
0.9
40%
1.56
-3%
1.69
-12%
1.3
14%
3.04 ?(1.5 - 5.37, n=5)
-101%
Idle Maximum *
1.62
1.59
2%
1.5
7%
1.58
2%
1.73
-7%
1.6
1%
3.18 ?(1.62 - 5.44, n=5)
-96%
Load Average *
4.91
3.33
32%
6.5
-32%
5.37
-9%
2.54
48%
5.7
-16%
8.77 ?(3.6 - 15.8, n=5)
-79%
Load Maximum *
8.93
7.59
15%
11
-23%
8.74
2%
4.61
48%
7.3
18%
12.6 ?(8.93 - 15.9, n=5)
-41%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.7 (1.081-12.5)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.03 (4.38-10.4)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.084 (1.034-1.265)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.129 (0.898-1.623)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.32 (4.08-4.55)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.55 (7.22-9.66)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.084 (1.034-1.265)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.129 (0.898-1.623)

电池寿命

和它的前辈一样,Galaxy A54有一个5000毫安时的电池。任何期望电池寿命类似于Galaxy A53的人将会感到惊喜,因为我们的测试强调了每个领域的更好性能。可以看到明显的改进,特别是在视频播放方面。

Galaxy A54也优于大多数的同行,只有 Xperia 10 IV拥有更多的耐力,而其他所有的灯都已经熄灭了。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
43h 11min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 112)
15h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
25h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 44min
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 13 Lite
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2022
2018 mAh
Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 IV
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
-32%
-8%
31%
-12%
Reader / Idle
2591
2240
-14%
2049
-21%
1878
-28%
3760
45%
2431
-6%
H.264
1508
1185
-21%
797
-47%
1318
-13%
1578
5%
1146
-24%
WiFi v1.3
941
822
-13%
769
-18%
768
-18%
1168
24%
886
-6%
Load
284
321
13%
164
-42%
360
27%
429
51%
246
-13%

Pros

+ 非常明亮和准确的显示
+ 混合型SIM卡加eSIM卡
+ 快速的microSD插槽
+ 长期更新
+ 准确定位
+ 防尘和防水

Cons

- 没有直流调光
- 充电速度慢
- 没有无线充电
- 存储速度慢
- 游戏性能差
- 蓝牙的音频编解码器很少

评语--Galaxy A54中并非所有东西都很好

审查了:三星Galaxy A54 5G。评测模型由德国三星公司提供。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
审查了:三星Galaxy A54 5G。评测模型由德国三星公司提供。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)

三星以 "A for Awesome "的口号宣传其Galaxy A系列,实际上,Galaxy A54背后的公司继续成功发展该系列。今年,它再次提供了一款非常好的智能手机。

该设备包括显示屏方面的实际升级,现在更亮了,有更好的电池寿命和一个体面的三摄像头系统。在自己的中端产品中首次支持eSIM是一个我们非常欢迎的功能。其他有利于Galaxy A54 5G的领域包括质量非常好的定位,快速的Wi-Fi 6以及长期更新。此外,新的设计看起来和感觉上都要更高级。

三星Galaxy A54 5G是一款非常好的中档智能手机,但我们的审查也揭示了一些弱点。

然而,三星智能手机也必须忍受批评:该处理器的额外性能核心更快,但是,这并不总是足够的,特别是在游戏时。在浏览系统时也很明显,是可以归因于缓慢的内存。缓慢的充电速度可能对电池很容易,但对你的耐心水平却很难,特别是如果速度是你的首要任务。

鉴于449美元的高起点建议零售价,我们希望看到至少有一个更高级的功能。无论是更强大的SoC、无线充电还是更现代的显示技术。在这个价格类别中,令人兴奋的替代品有谷歌Pixel 6a,以及摩托罗拉Edge 30 Fusion以及小米13 Lite.

价格和可用性

Galaxy A54 5G有各种颜色和存储版本,目前可以直接从三星的在线商店订购,价格为449美元。.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G - 01/30/2024 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 77%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
93%
Games Performance
51 / 64 → 79%
Application Performance
77 / 86 → 89%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
70%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A54 5G评测 - 一款强大的中端智能手机,有很多升级的地方
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-05- 2 (Update: 2023-05- 2)