Notebookcheck Logo

一加诺德2T智能手机评论。经济型高端手机,没有什么创新

一个新的设计--但还有什么? 一加诺德2T以其粗糙的表面从经典的一加手机中汲取灵感。除此以外,与前代产品相比,乍一看没有什么变化。在我们的评论中,我们将看到我们是否能确定任何可以证明更新的完善之处。
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
一加诺德2T

OnePlus Nord系列卖得很好,因此,这并不令人惊讶。一加Nord 2在短短9个月后就被更新了。OnePlus Nord 2T以更新的设计进入市场,其价格与前代产品相同。

我们想在我们的评论中发现这些修改,尽管这些修改乍看之下似乎并不多。虽然纸面上有一个新的SoC,但事实证明,它几乎是一个完全克隆的SoC在一加诺德2仔细观察,发现它几乎完全是一加Nord 2的SoC。那么,Nord 2T是不是纯粹的设计更新?

OnePlus Nord 2T (Nord Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 8 x 2 - 3 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G77 MP9
Memory
12288 MB 
Display
6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, 180 Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 240 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n41/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 159.1 x 73.2
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 80-watt SuperVOOC charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase-comparison AF, contrast AF, OIS, dual-LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps, videos @720p/​960fps (camera 1); 8.0 MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 2.0 MP, f/​2.2, monochrome (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.4, videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, silicon case, 24 Months Warranty, LTE Cat 18/​13 (1200Mbps/​150Mbps), fanless
Weight
190 g
Price
499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.1 %
06/2022
OnePlus Nord 2T
Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9
190 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
84.9 %
08/2021
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
85.3 %
02/2022
Motorola Moto G200 5G
SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660
202 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2460x1080
86.4 %
10/2021
Xiaomi 11T
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
203 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
83.2 %
06/2022
Samsung Galaxy A53
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080

灰色配色的一加诺德2T的粗糙背面让人想起早期的一加手机,但它不像那些早期机型那样有抓地力。很明显,一加想用它来做一点粉丝服务。与一加Nord 2的光滑玻璃表面不同 OnePlus Nord 2,还有一个好处是指纹不明显,我们可以用我们的测试设备确定这一点。

第二种颜色的变体被称为 "玉雾",它有一个光泽的表面,所以它应该更容易受到指纹的影响。

一加Nord 2T是一款稍微容易管理的手机,它也比,例如,巨大的 摩托G200.机箱可以在小范围内扭曲,这可能也是由于塑料框架继续存在。然而,整体而言,其制造质量和稳定性都处于较高的水平。

一加诺德2T 5G
一加诺德2T 5G
一加诺德2T 5G
一加诺德2T 5G
一加诺德2T 5G

尺寸比较

168.1 mm 75.5 mm 8.9 mm 202 g164.1 mm 76.9 mm 8.8 mm 203 g159.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.1 mm 189 g159.1 mm 73.3 mm 8.3 mm 189 g159.1 mm 73.2 mm 8.2 mm 190 g

连接性 - 相同的价格水平

OnePlus手机有两种存储配置。

  • 8GB内存/128GB存储。399欧元(约合420美元)
  • 12GB内存/256GB存储。499欧元(约525美元)。

与前代产品相比,存储配置和价格完全保持不变。

无线充电或IP认证等高端功能并不存在,也没有用于连接耳机的3.5毫米插孔,也没有微型SD读卡器。

一个USB-C端口位于底部边缘,内部只支持USB 2.0速度,因此只能传输最大480 Mb/s。就像前代产品一样,NFC和蓝牙5.2可作为无线接口。

一个有风险的情况。麦克风直接位于底部的SIM卡托盘旁边。你必须小心为这里的SIM工具选择正确的孔,否则你可能不小心刺破薄膜。

左边:音量摇杆
左边:音量摇杆
右边。待机按钮,通知滑块
右边。待机按钮,通知滑块
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部。SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器
底部。SIM卡插槽、麦克风、USB-C接口、扬声器

软件 - 相对较短的更新政策

预装了基于Android 12的OxygenOS 12.1。这是OxygenOS的第一个主要版本,不再是完全独立的;相反,它是基于其合作伙伴公司Oppo的ColorOS开发的。

制造商再次承诺了两个新的Android 版本和三年的安全更新。由于安全补丁在测试时已经有两个月了,更新频率可能预计是每季度一次。

软件一加诺德2T
软件一加诺德2T
软件一加诺德2T

通信和GNSS - OnePlus的Wi-Fi问题

OnePlus智能手机可以使用所有当前标准连接到移动网络,它还支持5G SA。还有足够的4G频率,能够在旅行中访问移动互联网。

在审查期间,我们不断检查智能手机的移动网络接收质量。结果是。一加诺德2T在这里与许多高端智能手机相提并论,它显示出非常好的信号质量。

Wi-Fi 6也是可用的,当涉及到发送数据时,这款智能手机与它的对比设备是一致的,但当涉及到接收数据时,它的速度要慢很多。这可能只是一个软件问题,可以通过更新来解决。在测试过程中,数据率非常稳定。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (72.5 - 1736, n=49, last 2 years)
636 MBit/s ∼100% +41%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
451 (397min - 461max) MBit/s ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (328min - 351max) MBit/s ∼54% -24%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (867min - 902max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78.3 - 1710, n=49, last 2 years)
657 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269 (255min - 281max) MBit/s ∼30% -70%
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
888 (842min - 904max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (817min - 939max) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 (759min - 906max) MBit/s ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=210, last 2 years)
485 MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
877 (657min - 928max) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (737min - 887max) MBit/s ∼95%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (809min - 863max) MBit/s ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=210, last 2 years)
472 MBit/s ∼54%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø451 (397-461)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø884 (867-902)
室外的GPS测试
室外的GPS测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

在户外,我们的位置在经过最小的延迟后,可以精确到一米,这是一个非常好的结果。众多的卫星也可用于定位,而且还搭载了精度更高的SBAS系统。

为了能够对日常使用中的定位精度进行更深入的评估,我们骑上自行车,带上OnePlus Nord 2T以及Garmin Venu 2智能手表进行比较。

我们可以得出结论,Nord手机偶尔会出现一些小的误差,特别是在狭窄的老城区小巷里,但对比设备在这里的导航效果也不是很好。然而,在房屋之间距离不是很近的地区,定位精度非常好;因此,我们可以推荐OnePlus Nord 2T作为导航设备。

Garmin Venu 2定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2定位 - 桥梁
一加诺德2T定位 - 概述
一加诺德2T定位 - 概述
一加诺德2T定位--转折点
一加诺德2T定位--转折点
一加诺德2T定位 - 桥梁
一加诺德2T定位 - 桥梁

电话和通话质量 - 中等的通话质量

OnePlus使用谷歌的标准手机应用程序。它具有所有必要的功能。当然,如果你愿意,你也可以使用Play商店的其他应用程序,但在这种情况下,你应该寻找一个可靠的软件开发商。

内部听筒在最大音量时往往会发出嗡嗡声,一般来说,它再现声音的方式略显低沉。麦克风也不能那么清楚地接收我们的声音,电话那头的人证实了这一点。他们通过扬声器听起来要好一点,但我们必须注意不要说得太小声,否则免提麦克风就再也听不到我们的声音了。

照相机--在黑暗中更好

前置摄像头样本
前置摄像头样本

与前代产品相比,在相机方面几乎没有变化。仍然没有微距镜头,带有光学图像稳定功能的主摄像头仍然具有5000万像素的分辨率。然而,光圈和因此而产生的感光度略高。

因此,主摄像头也能很好地提亮我们的对比照片,但它也在HDR模式下创造了一个非常明亮的天空;此外,仔细观察,锐度相当一般。然而,在低光下,亮度实际上比前代产品更好,而且细节水平在这里也更好。也就是说,这款相机的性能并没有达到高端水平。

再一次,广角镜头拍出了体面的快照,但到现在,有一些手机摄像头可以提供更好的图像细节再现。

视频录制仍可采用4K和30帧。你必须在录制前决定是使用广角镜头还是主摄像头;录制时不可能切换。虽然自动对焦偶尔会出现极小的延迟,但总体上工作良好,亮度校正也是如此;这导致了体面的照片。

3200万像素的前置摄像头的工作做得相当好,它还能在头发区域提供体面的细节再现。如果你想的话,这可以让你把自拍放大一些。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - FlowerMain camera - SurroundingsMain camera - Low lightWide-angle camera
click to load images


ColorChecker
13.2 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord 2T: 8.34 ∆E min: 3.15 - max: 16.63 ∆E
ColorChecker
21.6 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
36 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
46.4 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
35 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
40 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Nord 2T: 31.39 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 46.41 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括充电器

与目前的趋势不同,一加诺德2T的包装盒中仍然包括一个充电器。此外,你还会得到一个外壳、一根USB-C电缆和一个SIM卡工具。

OnePlus的商店再次为Nord手机提供了一个特殊的砂岩壳和一个屏幕保护膜,这两样东西的价格是23欧元(约合24美元)。还有一个特殊的配件包,包括TWS耳机,价格略低于67欧元(约71美元)。OnePlus目前还没有提供兼容的替代充电器。

制造商提供24个月的 保修为其智能手机提供24个月的保修。

输入设备和处理 - 90 Hz触摸屏

触摸屏可以顺利地使用,没有任何问题。显示屏可以设置为60或90赫兹的刷新率,也对此有所贡献。感觉在90赫兹时,你可以更直观地浏览菜单屏幕。

指纹传感器隐藏在屏幕下方,而且位置相当靠下。当你用手握住手机时,你经常要重新定位才能接触到传感器。识别精度很好,智能手机解锁的延迟时间很短。然而,令人恼火的是,指纹传感器并非一直处于激活状态,例如,当显示屏完全关闭时,它就没有反应。

脸部识别也被整合在一起,而且运行良好,但由于缺乏硬件支持的2D实现,它并不十分安全。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示 - 无直流调光

子像素网格
子像素网格

当涉及到显示面板时,似乎没有什么变化。尺寸、分辨率、亮度和测量。在OnePlus Nord 2和2T中,到处可以看到相同或非常相似的数值。再一次,这是一块AMOLED显示屏,分辨率扩大为1080p。

平均显示亮度约为573 cd/m²。我们还观察到该设备的PWM闪烁,这是OLED显示屏的典型现象。与旧的OnePlus手机不同,这里没有直流调光选项。

586
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
562
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 587 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 573.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 561 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.67 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.245
OnePlus Nord 2T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Motorola Moto G200 5G
IPS LCD, 2460x1080, 6.80
Xiaomi 11T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A53
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
2%
-8%
33%
29%
Brightness middle
561
594
6%
512
-9%
781
39%
718
28%
Brightness
573
594
4%
488
-15%
782
36%
730
27%
Brightness Distribution
96
99
3%
87
-9%
94
-2%
92
-4%
Black Level *
0.36
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.67
2.74
-3%
3.42
-28%
2
25%
1.62
39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.15
6
2%
5.9
4%
2.9
53%
4.21
32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.1
4.2
-2%
3.7
10%
2.3
44%
2
51%
Gamma
2.245 98%
2.278 97%
7154 0%
2.28 96%
2.156 102%
CCT
7104 91%
7322 89%
1.944 334362%
6852 95%
6545 99%
Contrast
1422

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 193.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 193.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 193.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21878 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

PWM频率
PWM频率
0%的亮度
0%的亮度
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
100%的亮度
100%的亮度

用固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置进行一系列的测量

我们在用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测试中仔细观察了色彩再现的准确性。

我们注意到灰度中有一个非常轻微的蓝色色调,但这也是唯一的相关偏差。尽管在手机市场上一般有更精确的显示器,但在这个面板上,颜色的细微差别对人眼来说是足够精确的。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼DCI-P3色彩空间
卡尔曼DCI-P3色彩空间
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.9 ms).

这款智能手机也可以在明亮的日子里在户外使用。尽管如此,你会注意到与三星或小米的OLED面板的区别,例如,它们的Boost模式可以产生更多的亮度,使它们在使用时更加灵活。使用OnePlus Nord 2T,你必须更经常地移到阴凉处。

视角几乎是完美的。当没有任何东西被反射到显示屏上时,即使从非常平坦的角度,也能很好地看到屏幕内容。

户外使用
户外使用
视角
视角

性能--有奇怪结果的SoC

乍一看,你可能会认为一加诺德2T配备了一个全新的SoC。但联发科Dimensity 1300亮度1200几乎在所有领域都完全吻合,而后者已被安装在 一加Nord 2.因此,你不应该期待性能上的飞跃,那些在这个价格范围内寻找最快的智能手机处理器的人,仍然会更好地使用 摩托罗拉Moto G200.

亮度亮度1300为日常使用提供了坚实的性能,即使是在多任务处理时。不过,一些基准测试显示的结果比预期的要低。目前很难说这是由于OnePlus的软件、基准测试或SoC造成的,因为OnePlus Nord 2T是我们评测的第一款采用该SoC的设备。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1076 Points ∼100% +159%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
857 Points ∼80% +107%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
809 Points ∼75% +95%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
740 Points ∼69% +78%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=251, last 2 years)
668 Points ∼62% +61%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
415 Points ∼39%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
 
415 Points ∼39% 0%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3286 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
2916 Points ∼89% +8%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2700 Points ∼82%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
 
2700 Points ∼82% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2463 Points ∼75% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=251, last 2 years)
2187 Points ∼67% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1878 Points ∼57% -30%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
794271 Points ∼100% +32%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
604538 Points ∼76% +1%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
600384 Points ∼76%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
 
600384 Points ∼76% 0%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
570375 Points ∼72% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=107, last 2 years)
551274 Points ∼69% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
409976 Points ∼52% -32%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
18567 Points ∼100% +74%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
12120 Points ∼65% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11470 Points ∼62% +7%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
10678 Points ∼58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
 
10678 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=143, last 2 years)
10123 Points ∼55% -5%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
8486 Points ∼46% -21%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5711 Points ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5319 Points ∼93% +10%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
5130 Points ∼90% +6%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4856 Points ∼85%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
 
4856 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8124, n=168, last 2 years)
4221 Points ∼74% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3626 Points ∼63% -25%
System
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
9996 Points ∼100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
 
9996 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
9622 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
9292 Points ∼93% -7%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8546 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=168, last 2 years)
7468 Points ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7157 Points ∼72% -28%
Memory
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7277 Points ∼100% +55%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7144 Points ∼98% +52%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5648 Points ∼78% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=168, last 2 years)
4841 Points ∼67% +3%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4699 Points ∼65%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
 
4699 Points ∼65% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3855 Points ∼53% -18%
Graphics
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13865 Points ∼100% +60%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
8672 Points ∼63%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
 
8672 Points ∼63% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7754 Points ∼56% -11%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7516 Points ∼54% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 25642, n=168, last 2 years)
7332 Points ∼53% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5178 Points ∼37% -40%
Web
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1665 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1604 Points ∼96% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=168, last 2 years)
1384 Points ∼83% +1%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1365 Points ∼82%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
 
1365 Points ∼82% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1276 Points ∼77% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1210 Points ∼73% -11%
AImark - Score v2.x
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
286905 Points ∼100% +393%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
71546 Points ∼25% +23%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71083 Points ∼25% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=126, last 2 years)
61947 Points ∼22% +6%
OnePlus Nord 2T
MediaTek Dimensity 1300, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
58244 Points ∼20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
 
58244 Points ∼20% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4714 Points ∼2% -92%

在图形性能方面,Nord 2T的表现要好得多,其Mali-G77 MP9特别是在离屏测试中,它甚至经常达到第一名。

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1453 Points ∼100% +12%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1295 Points ∼89%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1256 Points ∼86% -3%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1205 Points ∼83% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
621 Points ∼43% -52%
Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1564 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1324 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1291 Points ∼83% -2%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1283 Points ∼82% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
636 Points ∼41% -52%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5711 Points ∼100% +26%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4548 Points ∼80%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4214 Points ∼74% -7%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4194 Points ∼73% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points ∼40% -50%
Wild Life Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5765 Points ∼100% +25%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4623 Points ∼80%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4208 Points ∼73% -9%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4179 Points ∼72% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2293 Points ∼40% -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps ∼100% +102%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps ∼96% +93%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps ∼67% +35%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps ∼49% -2%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
200 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
185 fps ∼93% -7%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
178 fps ∼89% -11%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
161 fps ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
92 fps ∼46% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps ∼100% +86%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps ∼76% +42%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼57% +5%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps ∼53% -2%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
129 fps ∼100%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
124 fps ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
122 fps ∼95% -5%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps ∼47% -53%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps ∼100% +39%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps ∼77% +7%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼72% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼47% -35%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps ∼100%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps ∼97% -3%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps ∼48% -52%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼100% +7%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps ∼93% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps ∼93%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps ∼80% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼45% -51%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps ∼100%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps ∼92% -8%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼46% -54%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps ∼100% +6%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps ∼100% +6%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps ∼94% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼45% -52%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps ∼100% +116%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps ∼100% +116%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps ∼90% +96%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps ∼48% +3%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.7 fps ∼46%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps ∼100% +4%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps ∼98% +2%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps ∼96%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼86% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼47% -51%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps ∼100%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps ∼95% -5%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps ∼46% -54%

我们的评测装置在浏览互联网时也非常快。在实践中,这意味着网站的加载速度很快,而且在滚动时往往已经有了图像。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
75.9 Points ∼100% +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
67 Points ∼88% 0%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)
66.955 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
63.5 Points ∼84% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=166, last 2 years)
61.7 Points ∼81% -8%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
51.8 Points ∼68% -23%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
51.1 Points ∼67% -24%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
79.8 runs/min ∼100% +34%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=153, last 2 years)
60.7 runs/min ∼76% +2%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chome 102)
59.7 runs/min ∼75%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
59.7 runs/min ∼75% 0%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
54.1 runs/min ∼68% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)
51.24 runs/min ∼64% -14%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chome 92)
50.2 runs/min ∼63% -16%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
147 Points ∼100% +126%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=175, last 2 years)
91.7 Points ∼62% +41%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
70 Points ∼48% +8%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
69 Points ∼47% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
69 Points ∼47% +6%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)
65 Points ∼44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
65 Points ∼44% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)
33879 Points ∼100%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
33879 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
29912 Points ∼88% -12%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
28695 Points ∼85% -15%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
26207 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
24159 Points ∼71% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=180, last 2 years)
23122 Points ∼68% -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=180, last 2 years)
3220 ms * ∼100% -129%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
1920.3 ms * ∼60% -37%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
1809 ms * ∼56% -29%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
1444 ms * ∼45% -3%
OnePlus Nord 2T (Chrome 102)
1406.4 ms * ∼44%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
1406 ms * ∼44% -0%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
1358 ms * ∼42% +3%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 3.1的存储速度非常快,就像它在前代产品中一样。这也使一加手机比一些竞争对手有明显的速度优势。加载时间很短,数据传输也不慢,至少不会被存储解决方案拖累。这使得OnePlus Nord 2T只提供一个USB 2.0端口更加令人遗憾,这在与其他设备交换数据时成为一个瓶颈。

OnePlus Nord 2TOnePlus Nord 2 5GMotorola Moto G200 5GXiaomi 11TSamsung Galaxy A53Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-5%
-14%
-31%
-40%
-4%
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB
1891.3
1827
-3%
1898
0%
1790
-5%
510.1
-73%
1781 ?(1330 - 2037, n=46)
-6%
923 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=246, last 2 years)
-51%
Sequential Write 256KB
1300.6
1256
-3%
712
-45%
942
-28%
486.7
-63%
943 ?(452 - 1559, n=46)
-27%
465 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=246, last 2 years)
-64%
Random Read 4KB
235.8
223.7
-5%
155.9
-34%
139.3
-41%
229.9
-3%
263 ?(181 - 345, n=46)
12%
165 ?(13.5 - 345, n=246, last 2 years)
-30%
Random Write 4KB
262.2
239
-9%
322.5
23%
133.3
-49%
210.8
-20%
273 ?(218 - 458, n=47)
4%
158.3 ?(56.5 - 458, n=247, last 2 years)
-40%

游戏--以最高60帧的速度进行游戏

OnePlus Nord 2T并没有明确宣传是一款游戏手机,但其90赫兹的屏幕至少可以在某种程度上实现HFR游戏。不过,这在我们测试的游戏中并不奏效。我们在《Armajet》以及要求更高的3D射击游戏《PUBG Mobile》中取得了最高约60帧的成绩。我们用GameBench的工具确定了帧率。工具来确定帧率。

如果你有更高的要求,并将PUBG Mobile中的图形设置设置为高清,你只能达到40帧左右。这仍然是可以接受的,大多数手机游戏可以在智能手机上玩,没有任何问题。然而,人们的印象仍然是,这里可以取得更好的结果。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø59.3 (57-60)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø58.9 (55-60)
; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.9 (39-41)

排放 - 运转时很热

温度

OnePlus智能手机在长时间的负载下会变得相当热,这对性能也有影响。在几次运行基准测试后,它的波动很大;它可以不时地恢复到最大值,但随后又明显下降。

Max. Load
 44.6 °C44 °C36.3 °C 
 45.7 °C44.2 °C36.7 °C 
 43.8 °C42.7 °C36.5 °C 
Maximum: 45.7 °C
Average: 41.6 °C
34.6 °C40.6 °C40.2 °C
36.7 °C40.9 °C42.1 °C
37 °C41.7 °C44.3 °C
Maximum: 44.3 °C
Average: 39.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 % ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.2 % ∼96% +61%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80.4 % ∼81% +36%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.4 % ∼62% +4%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.1 % ∼59%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.8 % ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 % ∼93% +38%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 % ∼81% +20%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66.6 % ∼68% +1%
OnePlus Nord 2T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.9 % ∼67%
051015202530Tooltip
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø7.7 (5.25-7.97)
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø7.57 (7.1-8.98)
Xiaomi 11T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.08 (6.98-7.67)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)
OnePlus Nord 2T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.1 (16.4-27.7)
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø28.8 (27.4-34.2)
Xiaomi 11T Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.6 (23.7-24.8)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)
热图--正面
热图--正面
热图-背面
热图-背面

发言人

一加诺德2T的声音处于一个平均水平。如果需要,扬声器可以变得相当响亮,但如果它们能提供更多的中低频就更好了。因此,声音并不失真,但有点高亢,这使它看起来比高质量的扬声器更薄。听筒被用作第二个扬声器,以创造立体声效果。

扬声器或耳机可以通过USB-C端口或蓝牙5.2连接。这在两种情况下都能顺利工作,带有3.5毫米插头的耳机也可以用适配器来使用。目前所有重要的蓝牙音频编解码器,如aptX自适应和LHDC,都被支持(除了三星的专有编解码器)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.244.22533.9353127304032.430.3503632.26330.927.58019.419.310019.923.612515.518.716015.932.320012.341.525012.951.331512.955.44009.959.550010.265.763013.467.28001771.5100014.275.7125012.875.8160011.778.7200010.277.9250011.676.531501375.740001577.950001675630014.673.6800015.265.61000015.964.41250016.363.31600016.659SPL26.287.4N0.767.3median 14.2median 65.7Delta1.9135338.644.538.433.728.833.434.535.837.630.128.621.323.52121.516.327.714.738.212.94514.351.21353.110.857.112.362.713.566.519.571.61578.514.177.914.97611.976.612.87615.472.616.573.216.767.517.272.31865.117.963.817.658.518.351.82886.10.962.1median 15median 65.12.111.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus Nord 2TSamsung Galaxy A53
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus Nord 2T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A53 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 充电速度稍快

能源消耗

在能耗方面,一加Nord 2T与对比设备基本持平,甚至在满负荷情况下需要的能量略少。

Nord 2T的一个新特点是充电技术。使用了兄弟公司Oppo的SuperVOOC,它能以最大80瓦的功率为电池充电。这比前代产品多了15瓦,但实际上,这对充电时间并没有什么影响。智能手机再次充满电只需要不到35分钟,而你只需几分钟就能获得足够的电池寿命来使用几个小时。

Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.3 / 1.7 Watt
Load midlight 4 / 6.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
OnePlus Nord 2T
4500 mAh
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
Motorola Moto G200 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 1300
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-16%
-5%
-14%
-9%
0%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.8
11%
0.6
33%
0.78
13%
0.9
-0%
0.9
-0%
0.913 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=193, last 2 years)
-1%
Idle Average *
1.3
1.2
8%
0.9
31%
1.86
-43%
1.3
-0%
1.3
-0%
1.672 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=193, last 2 years)
-29%
Idle Maximum *
1.7
1.6
6%
1.5
12%
1.88
-11%
1.6
6%
1.7
-0%
1.899 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=193, last 2 years)
-12%
Load Average *
4
5.7
-43%
7
-75%
3.98
-0%
5.7
-43%
4
-0%
4.49 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=193, last 2 years)
-12%
Load Maximum *
6.8
10.9
-60%
8.4
-24%
8.78
-29%
7.3
-7%
6.8
-0%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=193, last 2 years)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
: Ø3.48 (1.16-10.7)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.2 (5.87-6.81)
; Idle 1min: Ø1.386 (1.137-2.14)

电池寿命

虽然4,500毫安时的电池和Nord 2一样大。 诺德2但与市场上的其他智能手机相比,你必须管理较少的容量。

这在Wi-Fi测试中并不明显。这款手机在这里实现了15:49小时的良好运行时间,与前代产品持平,甚至略高于对比设备。不过,在闲置场景和看电影时,会发现其他智能手机在这方面拥有更多的资源。

尽管如此,一加诺德2T在不充电的情况下正常使用可以轻松度过两个工作日。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 16min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 18min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 39min
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord 2T
4500 mAh
1936 min ∼80%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
1926 min ∼79%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
5000 mAh
2695 min ∼111%
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
2244 min ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
2431 min ∼100%
H.264 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord 2T
4500 mAh
1158 min ∼101%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
1126 min ∼98%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
5000 mAh
1501 min ∼131%
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
1450 min ∼127%
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
1146 min ∼100%
WiFi v1.3 (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord 2T
4500 mAh
949 min ∼107%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
958 min ∼108%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
5000 mAh
905 min ∼102%
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
813 min ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
886 min ∼100%
Load (sort by value)
OnePlus Nord 2T
4500 mAh
279 min ∼113%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
4500 mAh
272 min ∼111%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
5000 mAh
229 min ∼93%
Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh
267 min ∼109%
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
246 min ∼100%

Pros

+ 快速存储
+ 时尚的外壳
+ 良好的低光照相机
+ 合理的电池寿命
+ 快速充电
+ 良好的接收质量

Cons

- 相对较短的更新策略
- SoC性能波动
- 有时Wi-Fi很慢
- 语音部分发闷
- 负载下发热强烈
- 没有无线充电
- 没有直流调光

结论 - 几乎没有任何真正的更新

在审查中。OnePlus Nord 2T。测试设备由OnePlus德国提供。
在审查中。OnePlus Nord 2T。测试设备由OnePlus德国提供。

一加诺德2T与前代产品相比,提供了一些更新,但仔细观察,这些更新相当微不足道。主摄像头在低光下能拍出更好的照片,OnePlus决定采用新的设计,新的SoC带来一些细节上的改进,但它与OnePlus Nord 2的中心部件非常相似。

这导致这款智能手机很难为前代产品的用户提供任何更新的动力。同时,它仍然是一款经济型手机,具有良好的性能,快速的存储,较长的电池寿命,以及稍微容易管理的格式。

强烈的发热也是这款手机的一个问题,以及我们在基准测试中观察到的奇怪的性能下降。然而,这款智能手机在日常使用中运行平稳,OnePlus可能仍然能够通过更新来纠正这个问题。在某些情况下,Wi-Fi的速度稍慢,以及与市场上其他产品相比,更新政策较短,也是令人讨厌的。

一加Nord 2T与前代产品相比,只是一个小的更新。SoC在Wi-Fi和性能稳定性方面似乎仍有轻微问题。

因此,价格较低的前代产品一加Nord 2具有成熟的SoC,甚至可能是目前更好的选择。该三星Galaxy A53也更紧凑一些,但你将不得不为类似的价格忍受显著的性能损失。

价格和可用性

一加诺德2T在美国还没有正式上市,但你可以在亚马逊上找到它。Newegg,例如,价格约为540美元起。

OnePlus Nord 2T - 06/20/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 73%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
87%
Games Performance
53 / 64 → 83%
Application Performance
77 / 86 → 89%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
72%
Average
79%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 一加诺德2T智能手机评论。经济型高端手机,没有什么创新
Florian Schmitt, 2022-06-22 (Update: 2022-06-22)