诺基亚X30智能手机评论。诺基亚最快的生态智能手机

Name: Nokia X30
Brand: Nokia

传统品牌。 诺基亚正在再次加强其游戏。X30 5G是芬兰制造商迄今为止最快的智能手机，也应该是最持久的。这款中档智能手机在功能方面给人留下了深刻的印象，同时还有3年的保修和同样长的更新。整体包装是否符合预期，将在以下评论中揭晓。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/06/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

通过X30 5G，诺基亚正在推出它声称是迄今为止最具可持续性的智能手机。这款6.43英寸的Android 手机的框架由回收的铝制成，而后盖则由65%的回收塑料制成。诺基亚用70%的再生纸生产X30 5G的包装，并省去了充电器，以尽量减少电子垃圾和排放。

为了保持对生态环境的关注，你还可以租用智能手机，而不是购买，从而抵制丢弃的心态。

Snapdragon 695 5G ，为诺基亚的中端智能手机提供动力，两侧是高达8GB的内存和256GB的存储。与它的IPS前辈，诺基亚X20 ，X30 5G有一个90赫兹的AMOLED显示屏，开箱就有Android 12。这还伴随着3年的保修期和制造商承诺为X30 5G提供同样长的Android 升级和安全更新。

Test device courtesy of Nokia Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Nokia X30 (X Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 619

Memory

6 GB

Display

6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, FHD+, HDR10, HLG, under display Fingerprint sensor, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, 700 Nits peak brightness, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 110 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, IR-LED, Accelerometer, G-sensor, Gyroscope, E-compass, USB-OTG, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41), 5G (Band n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78), Dual-SIM, eSIM, Head SAR 0.79 W/kg, Body SAR 1.37 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 158.9 x 73.9

Battery

4200 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix 50MP main camera (AF, OIS, 2.0μm 4-in-1, f/1.8, 1/1.57”) + 13MP ultrawide camera (FOV 123°, f/2.4, 1/3.06”), video recording up to 1080p@60fps
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix 2.0μm 4-in-1, f/2.4, 1/3.06”

Additional features

Speakers: single speaker, Keyboard: virtual, SIM Tool, Quick start guide, Warranty information, 3 years of OS upgrades, 3 years of monthly security updates, 36 Months Warranty, fanless, waterproof

Weight

185 g

Price

519 Euro

Links

Nokia homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
81.7 %	11/2022	Nokia X30 SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	185 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
85.8 %	09/2022	Google Pixel 6a Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20	178 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2400x1080
80.6 %	05/2021	Nokia X20 SD 480, Adreno 619	220 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
85.6 %	07/2022	Nothing Phone (1) SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L	193.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
83.4 %	06/2022	Samsung Galaxy A53 Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4	189 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080
87.7 %	03/2022	Xiaomi 12 SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	179 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.28"	2400x1080

外壳 - 比上一代产品更轻、更优雅

诺基亚为X30 5G提供 "云蓝 "和 "冰白 "两种颜色，其中前者看起来更像是深灰色或绿色，这取决于环境光线。这款智能手机的重量为185克，明显比它的诺基亚X20前辈，后者的6.67英寸显示屏的重量为220克。这款评测候选手机通过了IP67认证，因此在防尘和防水方面更胜一筹。

虽然诺基亚X30 5G的后盖是由塑料制成的，但它感觉质量要高得多，与稳定地将正面和背面固定在一起的铝制框架配合得很好。由于其磨砂表面，X30 5G的背面非常耐指纹，并与突出于后盖约3毫米的相机单元无缝融合。

AMOLED显示屏受到大猩猩玻璃Victus的保护，屏幕下隐藏着一个指纹传感器。1600万像素的自拍相机位于顶部中央的一个冲孔中。

设备 - 租用诺基亚X30而不是购买

诺基亚X30 5G有两个存储版本。第一个型号，有6GB内存和128GB存储，官方价格为519欧元（约合514美元）。第二个型号可能更有趣，提供8GB内存和256GB存储，但只需多花30欧元（约合29美元），价格为549欧元（约合545美元）。

你可以不买智能手机，也可以租用它。这可以通过诺基亚的订阅模式实现，每月提供25欧元（约合24美元），可以在3个月内通知取消。一旦X30 5G被退回，它就会按照诺基亚的可持续发展标准送给另一个用户。根据制造商的说法，旧的智能手机要么被回收，要么捐赠给慈善机构。如果不再运作，这些智能手机也可以作为备件使用。

与其不同的是诺基亚X20前辈，X30 5G没有耳机插孔和microSD插槽。取而代之的是一个具有OTG功能的USB-C端口，以USB 2.0的速度传输数据，一个FM收音机接收器，蓝牙5.1和一个NFC芯片。由于支持DRM Widevine L1，该智能手机还可以播放高清网络流。

软件--保证三次Android 升级

X30 5G运行的是库存Android 12，诺基亚只补充了少量的第三方应用程序，如LinkedIn、Netflix、GoPro Quik和Spotify。这些工具位于主屏幕上的应用程序文件夹中，如果需要，可以全部卸载。诺基亚的内部支持应用程序 "我的设备 "也属于该智能手机的软件曲目。

诺基亚还打算为X30 5G提供为期三年的每月安全更新，并承诺进行三次操作系统升级。因此，我们可以合理地假设，Android 15也将提供给该智能手机。

然而，制造商在每月安全更新方面似乎很松懈，至少在我们审查期间是这样。截至11月初，Android 安全补丁是从9月5日开始的，如果以诺基亚自己的标准来判断，至少有一个月时间太长。

通信和GNSS--WiFi 6速仅在纸上谈兵

在16个4G频段和11个5G频段，诺基亚X30 5G提供相当广泛的移动频率覆盖。虽然对于国际使用来说有点过于稀疏，但在欧洲地区应该不会出现连接问题。

通过WiFi 6（又称WLAN 802.11ax），诺基亚的X30 5G配备了快速的WLAN标准。事实证明，Wi-Fi传输速率在测试中是稳定的，但顶多是Wi-Fi 5的水平。

在359 Mbps的峰值速率下，X30 5G比具有WiFi-5功能的X30 5G略快。诺基亚X20，但远远落后于对比设备，如谷歌Pixel 6a和小米12这两款设备的数据吞吐量是前者的两倍以上。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	897 (449^min - 907^max) MBit/s +173%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	854 (763^min - 898^max) MBit/s +160%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=209, last 2 years)	655 MBit/s +99%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	345 (328^min - 351^max) MBit/s +5%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	329 (286^min - 340^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	946 (459^min - 973^max) MBit/s +164%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	757 (380^min - 826^max) MBit/s +111%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=210, last 2 years)	692 MBit/s +93%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	359 (346^min - 369^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	269 (255^min - 281^max) MBit/s -25%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)	1536 MBit/s
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1407 (872^min - 1714^max) MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	946 (926^min - 951^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1751 (879^min - 1776^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)	1364 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	598 (517^min - 731^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	222 (126^min - 326^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	313 (190^min - 343^max) MBit/s

Nokia X30; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (286-340)

Nokia X30; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø359 (346-369)

诺基亚智能手机的定位是通过卫星导航系统GPS（L1，L5）、Glonass（L1）、Galileo（E1，E5a）和Beidou（B1，B2a，B1c）进行的。在测试中，这在建筑物内和室外都能快速工作，精确度高达3米。

X30 5G还在4公里的自行车骑行中提供了精确的位置数据。与Garmin Venu 2健身智能手表相比，这款智能手机不太准确，但记录的小偏差非常小，不会对日常使用产生负面影响。

电话和语音质量

诺基亚X30 5G在通话中提供良好的语音质量。我们的声音能清晰明了地传达到对方。环境噪音被可靠地过滤掉了，即使启用了免提模式。唯一的缺点是。身体SAR辐射水平相当高（头部SAR 0.79 W/kg）。

支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。两个nano-SIM卡可以放入SIM卡槽。还可以激活eSIM。

摄像头 - 双摄像头，5千万像素

X30 5G的双摄像头系统包括一个50MP的主摄像头和一个13MP的超广角摄像头。前者提供光学图像稳定功能，并使用四合一像素分选拍摄12.5百万像素的照片。超广角相机（f/2.4）覆盖123°的视野。

与主摄像头一样，1600万像素的自拍摄像头被安置在一个冲孔中，将四个相邻的像素合并为一个。它能拍出良好的400万像素照片，并能在人工智能的帮助下在人像模式下产生虚化效果。其他特殊图像模式包括用于长时间曝光和夜间拍摄的三脚架模式，以及用于特别黑暗环境的 "黑暗视觉 "模式。

根据诺基亚自己的声明，X30 5G据说可以提供 "迄今为止最好的PureView照片体验"，这意味着买家可以期待与普通中档智能手机相比有更好的图像质量。主摄像头在白天实际上能拍出好照片，以自然的色彩给人留下深刻印象。但有时对比度有点低，细节不那么丰富。夜间拍摄更令人印象深刻，因为主摄像头仍然能够拍摄出清晰和生动的照片，即使在非常低的余光下。

超广角摄像头不能与主摄像头竞争，但它利用其能力实现了体面的图片质量。其基本功能被称为 "捕捉融合"，功能如下：来自主摄像头和超广角摄像头的图像被结合起来，这意味着超广角照片在图像中心有更多细节。这在测试照片中可以直接看到，例如，堤坝及其阴影，比所有对比设备的照片更清晰、更详细。

然而，超广角相机的弱点在缺乏主相机帮助的地方也同样明显，例如在周边地区，这些地方显得模糊不清。

X30 5G能以60 FPS的速度录制全高清视频，并有软件图像稳定功能的支持。总的来说，图片质量还不错，但并不突出。另一方面，我们非常喜欢它的声音，它记录得非常清晰。比全高清更高的分辨率是不可能的，因为骁龙695 5G不支持4K视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1 Daylight photo 2 Ultra wide angle Low light photo

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

主摄像头再次展示了它在受控光线条件下的才能。在最佳光线下，它非常准确地再现了ColorChecker参考图表的颜色（除了较深的绿色和棕色调），也能清晰地显示测试图表。然而，在低光照条件下（1勒克斯的余光），色彩的保真度和最重要的是图像的清晰度受到影响。

配件和保修 - 诺基亚智能手机的3年保修期

除了智能手机，X30 5G的平面包装还包括一条USB线（A型至C型），一个SIM卡工具，一份快速入门指南，以及一份包含安全说明的小册子。

诺基亚的在线商店提供许多配件，如扬声器、耳机、保护罩和电源适配器。尽管该智能手机的充电功率可达33瓦，但在审查时，诺基亚的商店里只有两个18瓦的电源适配器可用。

诺基亚X30 5G在欧盟地区有36个月的保修期。根据诺基亚的保修条件，澳大利亚、英国、冰岛、列支敦士登、黑山、北马其顿、挪威、瑞士和塞尔维亚也享受36个月的保修。这在其他国家可能有所不同，所以感兴趣的买家应该在购买前向他们的供应商查询。

输入设备和操作 - 灵敏的90赫兹触摸屏

由于其90赫兹的屏幕，诺基亚X30 5G使用起来非常流畅。此外，触摸屏对输入的准确反应一直到角落，对手指的阻力非常小。

然而骁龙695 5G和6GB的内存并没有使诺基亚智能手机成为一匹赛马。当大量应用同时打开或复杂的后台进程运行时，原本流畅的显示屏会出现一些停顿。

X30 5G的指纹传感器位于屏幕下方，可快速可靠地解锁智能手机。即使在显示屏停用的情况下，也会默认显示指纹图标，因此不必为验证而打开屏幕。

如果在系统设置中选择了解除时激活显示的选项，那么二维人脸识别的功能也一样好。在测试中，人脸扫描的命中率与指纹传感器相当，但需要足够的环境光线或明亮的显示屏。

显示屏 - AMOLED面板，具有四位数的亮度

诺基亚X30 5G的6.43英寸AMOLED面板的分辨率为2400 x 1080像素（长宽比为20:9），对应的像素密度为409 PPI，很不错。

刷新率可以分两个阶段调整。在预设的自适应 设置中，诺基亚智能手机会根据显示的内容自动调整刷新率，其工作频率最高可达90赫兹。在第二阶段，即标准设置中，刷新率被限制为60赫兹。

在纯白背景下，AMOLED面板的平均亮度为708.7cd/m²。如果我们将亮度测量限制在一个较小的图像部分（APL18），而不是全屏，我们甚至可以从显示器中获得高达1048 cd/m²的亮度。

AMOLED显示屏通过脉冲宽度调制（PWM）来调节亮度，在我们测量的所有亮度级别中，它的闪烁频率都很低，只有92赫兹。由于频率曲线的振幅曲线总是非常平坦，诺基亚X30 5G也应该适用于敏感用户。然而，我们在Android 设置中找不到直流调光模式。


660 cd/m²	679 cd/m²	747 cd/m²
655 cd/m²	693 cd/m²	772 cd/m²
685 cd/m²	699 cd/m²	788 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 788 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 708.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 693 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
144.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.228

	Nokia X30 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43	Google Pixel 6a AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10	Nokia X20 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67	Nothing Phone (1) OLED, 2400x1080, 6.55	Samsung Galaxy A53 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50	Xiaomi 12 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.28
Screen		39%	-20%	32%	29%	37%
Brightness middle	693	758 9%	646 -7%	620 -11%	718 4%	867 25%
Brightness	709	767 8%	617 -13%	625 -12%	730 3%	867 22%
Brightness Distribution	83	93 12%	89 7%	98 18%	92 11%	98 18%
Black Level *			0.7
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.78	0.9 81%	5.71 -19%	1.24 74%	1.62 66%	1.7 64%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.54	2.5 67%	8.9 -18%	2.31 69%	4.21 44%	4.4 42%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.6	1.6 56%	6.2 -72%	1.7 53%	2 44%	1.8 50%
Gamma	2.228 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2.122 ^104%	2.318 ^95%	2.156 ^102%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	7327 ^89%	6599 ^98%	8256 ^79%	6325 ^103%	6545 ^99%	6762 ^96%
Contrast			923

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

92 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 92 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 92 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

在测试实验室中，诺基亚X30 5G的屏幕并不证明是特别准确的颜色。AMOLED面板在颜色和灰度方面显然远离理想值（Delta-E>3），高色温使显示屏看起来很冷。由于显示设置只提供了白平衡的选择和深色背景的设计，所以在改善图片质量方面没有什么可以做的。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

由于其高亮度储备，用户能够在户外使用诺基亚X30 5G。即使在阳光直射下，也可以从视角稳定的显示屏上阅读内容，没有什么困难。

性能 - 搭载骁龙695 5G的诺基亚智能手机

X30 5G配备了一个坚实的中端SoC，其形式为骁龙695 5G和其 Adreno 619图形单元。这款八核处理器得到6GB内存的支持，并实现了可媲美 Exynos 1280的性能值，这在三星Galaxy A53等等。

诺基亚X30 5G在我们的基准测试中比它的前辈诺基亚X20快一点。诺基亚X20但也不能证明是一台超级计算机。尽管如此，给定的性能对于日常使用来说是完全足够的。然后，与类似价格范围内的其他中档智能手机的性能比较并不太令人满意。

诺基亚X30 5G在合成基准测试和GPU测试中远远落后；速度更快的智能手机，如谷歌Pixel 6a或小米12都有类似的价格。诺基亚在浏览器和内存测试中取得了更好的成绩，因为与竞争对手的性能差距总体上要小得多。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1237 Points +85%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	1025 Points +53%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)	918 Points +37%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	824 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	740 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (659 - 697, n=24)	676 Points +1%
Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	669 Points
Nokia X20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	510 Points -24%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3581 Points +87%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)	3009 Points +57%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	2998 Points +56%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	2940 Points +53%
Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1918 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1663 - 2038, n=24)	1904 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1878 Points -2%
Nokia X20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	1663 Points -13%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	982789 Points +144%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points +83%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	715338 Points +77%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	582264 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	409976 Points +2%
Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	403289 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (344344 - 416086, n=18)	389461 Points -3%
Nokia X20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	325785 Points -19%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	14508 Points +47%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=213, last 2 years)	11798 Points +19%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	11662 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	11470 Points +16%
Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	9875 Points
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	9717 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6897 - 11732, n=23)	9629 Points -2%

CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1109 Points +91%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	865 Points +49%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)	837 Points +44%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	760 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (521 - 606, n=18)	583 Points +1%
Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	580 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	579 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6860 Points +91%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	5950 Points +66%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points +60%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4768 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3171 - 3848, n=19)	3648 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3626 Points +1%
Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3589 Points
Nokia X20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	3260 Points -9%
System
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	10424 Points +29%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	10334 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points +20%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	9109 Points +13%
Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	8072 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6789 - 8231, n=19)	7725 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	7157 Points -11%
Nokia X20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	6308 Points -22%
Memory
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	6592 Points +52%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6535 Points +50%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points +44%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	4763 Points +9%
Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4351 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3167 - 4836, n=19)	4227 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3855 Points -11%
Nokia X20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	3484 Points -20%
Graphics
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	18370 Points +320%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	14148 Points +223%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points +222%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	8175 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	5178 Points +18%
Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4379 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3975 - 4426, n=19)	4340 Points -1%
Nokia X20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	3780 Points -14%
Web
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1785 Points +66%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points +39%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	1476 Points +37%
Nokia X20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	1360 Points +26%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	1273 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1078 - 1434, n=19)	1253 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1210 Points +12%
Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1078 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)	21814 Points +216%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	21639 Points +213%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	20784 Points +201%
Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	6903 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (5442 - 9348, n=15)	6775 Points -2%
Nokia X20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	6125 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	4239 Points -39%

AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)	21146 Points +315%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6766 Points +33%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	5967 Points +17%
Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192	5823 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (4924 - 5839, n=10)	5173 Points +2%
Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	5096 Points
Nokia X20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	4722 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	4714 Points -7%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2418 Points +585%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1626 Points +361%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	686 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	621 Points +76%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	353 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2586 Points +622%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2040 Points +470%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	692 Points +93%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	636 Points +78%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	358 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9782 Points +714%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7261 Points +505%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2576 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2275 Points +89%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1201 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	974 Points -19%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9713 Points +705%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6695 Points +455%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2570 Points +113%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2293 Points +90%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1206 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	980 Points -19%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2854 Points 0%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2841 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2689 Points -5%
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2606 Points -8%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5412 Points +101%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3902 Points +45%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2694 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2186 Points -19%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4513 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3546 Points +30%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2725 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2267 Points -17%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4518 Points +31%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4303 Points +24%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4277 Points +24%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3458 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3097 Points -10%
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2941 Points -15%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18286 Points +513%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8957 Points +200%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5759 Points +93%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3982 Points +33%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2985 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2440 Points -18%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10618 Points +245%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7205 Points +134%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5428 Points +76%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3746 Points +22%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3079 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2536 Points -18%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3415 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2938 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2261 Points -34%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5172 Points +18%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4369 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3647 Points -17%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4114 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4021 Points -2%
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3461 Points -16%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5060 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3621 Points +23%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2940 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2419 Points -18%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5345 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3939 Points +40%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2815 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2289 Points -19%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4265 Points +22%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3483 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3017 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2823 Points -19%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9693 Points +129%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9526 Points +125%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4645 Points +10%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4229 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3639 Points -14%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	24177 Points +435%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13988 Points +210%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5510 Points +22%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4519 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3842 Points -15%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4501 Points +30%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3754 Points +9%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3453 Points
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3070 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2997 Points -13%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +55%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	81 fps +4%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	78 fps
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -23%
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	59 fps -24%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	428 fps +351%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	252 fps +165%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	141 fps +48%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	95 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	92 fps -3%
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	81 fps -15%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +188%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps +76%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	56 fps +33%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	26 fps -38%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	213 fps +344%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	151 fps +215%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	82 fps +71%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	61 fps +27%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	48 fps
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	41 fps -15%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +317%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +107%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	35 fps +21%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	26 fps -10%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	164 fps +382%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	100 fps +194%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps +88%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	38 fps +12%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	29 fps -15%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +376%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps +218%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps +18%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	14 fps -18%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +290%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps +160%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps +85%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps +15%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	16 fps -20%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps +475%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +225%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps +83%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	15 fps +25%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	9.9 fps -17%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +376%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps +241%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	15 fps +83%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10 fps +22%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.2 fps
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.5 fps -21%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93 fps +389%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps +126%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps +89%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps +21%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	16 fps -16%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 fps +330%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps +152%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps +74%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	26 fps +13%
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	18 fps -22%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	113.8 Points +88%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +75%
Google Pixel 6a (Firefox 1ß4-2-ß)	75.261 Points +24%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	73.679 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 105.3, n=19)	71.2 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	63.5 Points +5%
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118)	60.684 Points
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)	49.39 Points -19%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +125%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	107 runs/min +124%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	90.4 runs/min +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 80.1, n=16)	54 runs/min +13%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chome 103)	53.71 runs/min +13%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)	51.24 runs/min +7%
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118)	47.7 runs/min
Nokia X20 (Chome 90)	38.7 runs/min -19%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)	100.2 Points +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (58 - 111, n=18)	74.3 Points +26%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	72 Points +22%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	69 Points +17%
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118)	59 Points

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	148 Points +95%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +75%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	102 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 - 156, n=12)	101 Points +33%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	77 Points +1%
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118)	76 Points
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)	70 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	69 Points -9%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	37279 Points +72%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)	33640 Points +55%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	33046 Points +52%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	24488 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	24159 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 31647, n=21)	24051 Points +11%
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118)	21723 Points
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)	15958 Points -27%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)	2749 ms * -44%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	1920.3 ms * -0%
Nokia X30 (Chrome 106.0.5249.118)	1913.1 ms *
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)	1796.1 ms * +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1298 - 2501, n=18)	1769 ms * +8%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +17%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	1531.6 ms * +20%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	930 ms * +51%

* ... smaller is better

	Nokia X30	Google Pixel 6a	Nokia X20	Nothing Phone (1)	Samsung Galaxy A53	Xiaomi 12	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		68%	-7%	121%	14%	178%	16%	109%
Sequential Read 256KB	499.88	1312.64 163%	489.3 -2%	1638 228%	510.1 2%	1851 270%	708 ?(303 - 1038, n=61) 42%	1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years) 201%
Sequential Write 256KB	467.96	712.94 52%	462.7 -1%	1351.9 189%	486.7 4%	1417 203%	517 ?(105.3 - 903, n=61) 10%	1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years) 138%
Random Read 4KB	189.83	219.53 16%	165.4 -13%	240.6 27%	229.9 21%	325.2 71%	188 ?(89.3 - 297, n=61) -1%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years) 30%
Random Write 4KB	162.59	225.61 39%	144.6 -11%	228.2 40%	210.8 30%	437.5 169%	182.5 ?(68.8 - 419, n=61) 12%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years) 67%

游戏 - 90 FPS仍然是大的例外

目前的游戏在诺基亚的X30 5G上基本上都能顺利运行。有时你必须降低图形设置。在《PUBG Mobile》中，可以选择的最大设置是 "高清/高"，这意味着游戏几乎总是以30FPS的速度渲染。在图形要求不高的《Armajet》中，诺基亚智能手机能够充分利用其90赫兹的屏幕，但帧率被限制在60赫兹，大概是出于节能的考虑。

帧率是通过我们的Gamebench测试工具确定。

Nokia X30; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.5 (55-61)

Nokia X30; PUBG Mobile; 2.2.0: Ø29.8 (28-31)

排放--运行中始终保持凉爽

温度

诺基亚X30 5G在使用过程中保持着令人愉快的凉爽。即使在重载的情况下，它也只发热到最高38.5℃。在内部，这款智能手机也没有失去控制。正如3DMark野外生活压力测试所显示的，它几乎能够在任何时候提取全部性能，甚至在长时间的最大负荷下也是如此。

Max. Load

Idle


36.5 °C	31.9 °C	28.5 °C
37.5 °C	31.1 °C	29 °C
37.5 °C	31.3 °C	28.8 °C

Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 32.5 °C


27.1 °C	30.9 °C	34.3 °C
28.1 °C	31.6 °C	38.5 °C
29 °C	31.9 °C	38.5 °C

Maximum: 34 °C
Average: 10.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.7 %
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	99.6 % 0%
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46.3 % -54%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42.9 % -57%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 %
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	97.8 % -2%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49.2 % -51%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%

Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.16 (2.15-2.17)

Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.52 (6.17-12.6)

Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.12 (4.09-4.14)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)

Nokia X30 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.22 (7.21-7.23)

Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.7 (17.4-40.5)

Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.3 (15.3-15.3)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)

Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø35.6 (27.5-59.4)

发言人

诺基亚X30 5G的扬声器位于USB-C端口旁边，能以82.3 dB(A)的音量播放，产生的音质是典型的智能手机，其中高音和中音占主导地位。声音组合中几乎没有低音，这使得声音整体上相当单薄。

有线音频设备，如耳机，可以通过一个USB-C适配器连接到智能手机上。这通过蓝牙5.1无线工作。支持从aptX、aptX HD到aptX自适应的蓝牙编解码。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Nokia X30 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 12 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--尽管电池很小，但经久不衰

消耗功率

诺基亚为X30 5G配备了4200毫安时的电池，按照Android ，这相对较小。电池容量在4500至5000毫安时之间，通常在竞争设备中很常见。作为回报，诺基亚的智能手机有效地利用了它的电力存储，并在节能操作方面表现出色，特别是在高负荷情况下。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	0.8 / 1.5 / 1.8 Watt
Load	4.3 / 6.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Nokia X30 4200 mAh	Google Pixel 6a 4410 mAh	Nothing Phone (1) 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-7%	0%	-7%	-9%	-2%	-11%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.68 15%	1 -25%	0.9 -13%	0.87 -9%	0.886 ?(0.56 - 1.2, n=18) -11%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Average *	1.5	1.56 -4%	1.2 20%	1.3 13%	1.7 -13%	1.76 ?(0.91 - 4.76, n=18) -17%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 3%
Idle Maximum *	1.8	1.58 12%	1.5 17%	1.6 11%	1.82 -1%	1.92 ?(0.98 - 4.79, n=18) -7%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 9%
Load Average *	4.3	5.37 -25%	4.2 2%	5.7 -33%	4.68 -9%	3.86 ?(2.4 - 9.52, n=18) 10%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -29%
Load Maximum *	6.5	8.74 -34%	7.4 -14%	7.3 -12%	7.41 -14%	5.45 ?(4.32 - 9.92, n=18) 16%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -28%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø4 (1.971-6.19)

Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor: Ø5.41 (1.011-10.6)

Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G: Ø4.05 (0.884-8.38)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280: Ø7.03 (4.38-10.4)

Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø7.17 (1.141-13.1)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.11 (3.95-4.25)

Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.65 (6.03-11.4)

Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.64 (4.38-5.25)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.55 (7.22-9.66)

Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.02 (8.51-9.65)

Nokia X30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.773 (1.712-1.849)

Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.013 (0.966-1.263)

Nothing Phone (1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.337 (1.083-1.702)

Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.129 (0.898-1.623)

Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.18 (1.054-1.884)

电池寿命

诺基亚X30 5G从其小型电池中提取了高于平均水平的运行时间。这款智能手机在浏览网页时可持续14小时以上，在播放视频时可持续20小时以上。

虽然这些都不是创纪录的速度，但在实践中，1至2个工作日的运行时间应该是绝对可能的。在对比设备中，诺基亚X20、谷歌Pixel 6a和小米12有类似的耐力水平。

X30 5G的最大充电功率为33瓦，但你必须自己寻找一个合适的电源适配器，因为该智能手机没有提供一个。诺基亚估计4200毫安时电池的电池寿命为800次完全充电循环。

X30 5G不支持无线充电或反向无线充电。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		41h 07min
WiFi Websurfing		14h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		20h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 02min

	Nokia X30 4200 mAh	Google Pixel 6a 4410 mAh	Nokia X20 4470 mAh	Nothing Phone (1) 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh
Battery Runtime		-2%	2%	-12%	-6%	-2%
Reader / Idle	2467	1878 -24%		1813 -27%	2431 -1%	2558 4%
H.264	1229	1318 7%		1059 -14%	1146 -7%	890 -28%
WiFi v1.3	860	768 -11%	879 2%	926 8%	886 3%	760 -12%
Load	302	360 19%		259 -14%	246 -19%	385 27%

Pros

+ 高质量的做工，良好的触觉效果

+ 90 Hz AMOLED屏幕

+ 股票Android 12

+ 双卡&eSIM

+ IP67认证

+ 电池运行时间长

+ 良好的相机夜间模式

+ 更新时间长

+ 3年保修

Cons

- 没有microSD插槽

- 屏幕色彩保真度不高

- 缓慢的WIFI

- 几乎没有任何性能储备

- 相对昂贵

对诺基亚X30 5G的评价

诺基亚X30 5G是一款体面的中档智能手机，比其前辈做得更好。与之相比诺基亚X20相比，它有一个明亮的AMOLED显示屏，刷新率为90赫兹，SoC也略显迅捷。然而，一些功能也被省略了，如microSD插槽和3.5毫米插孔。

X30 5G在竞争激烈的中端市场上保持良好的地位，并以坚实的规格表得分，但最终没有提供真正的独特卖点。这是很需要的，因为与类似装备的对手相比，这款智能手机相当昂贵，约为500美元（测试时）--如果考虑到它的性能价值，几乎太贵了。

但是，像诺基亚X20。所有寻找中档智能手机的买家都可以在这里得到很好的服务，它有一个坚实的摄像头，股票Android ，并有很长的保修期。

诺基亚的中端智能手机X30 5G以明亮的AMOLED屏幕、良好的电池运行时间和长期的保修期而得分。

当然，X30 5G的可持续发展主张也值得称赞。用于外壳和包装的回收材料，以及提供的订阅模式，都有助于节约宝贵的资源。另一方面，可持续性的概念还没有得到充分的利用：在这里可以做得更多。

那些在购买智能手机时真正考虑到环境因素的人，总体上来说，最好选择 Fairphone 4。价格和性能相似，但与X30 5G不同的是，Fairphone 4允许你更换电池，并可轻松更换其他部件，如相机单元或后盖。除此以外，还有5年的保修期。

除了Fairphone 4之外，诺基亚X30 5G的其他替代品还有，例如谷歌Pixel 6a，以及 Nothing Phone (1)和小米12.

价格和可用性

在2022年国际电影节（IFA）上首次亮相后，诺基亚X30 5G现在终于在全球范围内推出，有两种存储选项。6GB/128GB和8GB/256GB。奇怪的是，我们发现较小的版本通过美国亚马逊上市，价格为598.50美元。而其较大的对应产品的价格是575.00美元。.英国亚马逊提供较小的型号，价格为399.99英镑。

Nokia X30 - 2022-11-03 11/03/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

83%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

46 / 70 → 66%

Weight

89%

Battery

91%

Display

85%

Games Performance

34 / 64 → 52%

Application Performance

73 / 86 → 85%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

68%

Average

76%

82%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 897 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388744 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 诺基亚X30智能手机评论。诺基亚最快的生态智能手机

Manuel Masiero, 2022-11- 6 (Update: 2022-11- 6)

诺基亚X30智能手机评论。诺基亚最快的生态智能手机

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 比上一代产品更轻、更优雅

尺寸比较

设备 - 租用诺基亚X30而不是购买

软件--保证三次Android 升级

通信和GNSS--WiFi 6速仅在纸上谈兵

电话和语音质量

摄像头 - 双摄像头，5千万像素

配件和保修 - 诺基亚智能手机的3年保修期

输入设备和操作 - 灵敏的90赫兹触摸屏

显示屏 - AMOLED面板，具有四位数的亮度

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 搭载骁龙695 5G的诺基亚智能手机

游戏 - 90 FPS仍然是大的例外

排放--运行中始终保持凉爽

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Nokia X30 audio analysis

Xiaomi 12 audio analysis

电池寿命--尽管电池很小，但经久不衰

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对诺基亚X30 5G的评价

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare