Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar华硕 ROG Strix Scar 18 (2024) 评测：配备 RTX 4090 和迷你 LED 面板的游戏笔记本电脑
华硕推出 ROG Strix Scar 18 的目标是那些不缺乏必要资金的游戏玩家和创作者：我们测试的这款高端冠军配置的起价约为 4,500 欧元（约合 4,848 美元）。如此高的价格得益于其强大的硬件和非常明亮的 16:10 格式迷你 LED 显示屏，色彩准确，对角线长达 18 英寸。竞争对手包括 Alienware m18 R1、 宏碁掠夺者 Helios 18、 Razer Blade 18和 微星 Titan 18 HX A14VIG.
这款笔记本电脑是 Scar 18是我们去年测试过的 Scar 18 的同胞兄弟，结构完全相同。除显示屏外，CPU 代数是唯一的变化，Raptor Lake Refresh 取代了 Raptor Lake。
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (ROG Strix Scar 18 G834 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 110 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1455 MHz, Memory: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.4665, MUX-Switch + Advanced Optimus
Memory
32 GB
, DDR5-5600, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
18.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 168 PPI, BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini LED, G-Sync, Pantone Validated, Dolby Vision, glossy: no, HDR, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB, 2048 GB
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 1760 GB free
Weight
3.1 kg, Power Supply: 954 g
Price
4799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.3 % | 02/2024 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 30.8 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 89.2 % | 11/2023 | Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M | 3.9 kg | 26.7 mm | 18.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 90.7 % | 04/2023 | Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.9 kg | 26.7 mm | 18.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.3 % | 10/2023 | Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 3.2 kg | 29.15 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 91.4 % | 02/2023 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 21.9 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.8 % | 01/2024 | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.6 kg | 32.1 mm | 18.00" | 3840x2400 |
外壳 - 大量塑料，只有少量铝材
尽管价格不菲，但该机采用的高品质材料仍然有限，只有 Scar 显示屏盖子的背面采用了铝合金材料，其余部件均采用塑料材料。塑料的某些部分（键盘上方和短边）可以透出一些光线。正面和背面的 LED 灯带以及显示屏盖上的发光徽标为黑色机身带来了一些活力。
在做工方面，我们没有发现任何瑕疵，材料间的缝隙很小而且均匀。虽然盖子只能轻微扭动，但底座的反应却更加明显。几千欧元的昂贵笔记本电脑在这方面应该做得更好。对显示屏盖子施加压力不会造成任何图像伪影。铰链将盖子牢牢固定，但移动笔记本电脑时，显示屏仍会轻微晃动。最大打开角度为 130 度，单手即可打开。
Scar 18 是我们对比领域中最小巧、最轻便的设备之一，仅次于 刀锋 18超越。
设备 - 华硕 Strix 提供雷电 4
华硕笔记本电脑提供两个 USB-A 端口（USB 3.2 Gen 2）和两个 USB-C 端口（1 个 Thunderbolt 4、1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2）。两个 USB-C 端口都能输出 DisplayPort 信号，USB 3.2 Gen 2 端口还支持 Power Delivery。此外，还有一个 HDMI 端口、一个音频端口和一个千兆以太网端口。该笔记本电脑不包括存储卡读卡器。
笔记本电脑背面没有端口，所有端口都位于机身左右两侧。向背面延伸的线缆会挡住笔记本两侧的一些风扇开口。例如，电源线（倾斜的电源插头）就属于这种情况。惯用右手的用户可能只会对 USB-A 端口仅位于右侧感到恼火。
交流
在最佳条件下（附近没有其他 Wi-Fi 设备，笔记本电脑和服务器 PC 之间距离很近），笔记本电脑的 Wi-Fi 传输速率达到了良好甚至非常好的水平。Strix 使用 Wi-Fi 6E 芯片（英特尔 AX211），有线连接由 Realtek 控制器（RTL8125；2.5 Gbit/s）处理。
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø968 (656-1200)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1460 (1310-1543)
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø926 (475-985)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø993 (514-1160)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1681 (1662-1704)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1436 (766-1548)
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø861 (330-895)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1116 (932-1352)
网络摄像头
虽然华硕大多使用顶级硬件，但网络摄像头却是个例外，仅使用了一个微不足道的 0.9 百万像素型号（最大 1280x720 像素）。图像质量并不令人信服，但约 8 的色彩偏差（目标 DeltaE < 3）还是可以接受的。该相机不包括手动快门。
8.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
配件
除了常见的文件外，这款笔记本电脑不包括任何其他配件。
维护
要打开笔记本电脑，必须卸下机箱底部的所有螺丝。然后使用撬棍将机箱板抬起。取下机箱板后，就可以接触到存储库（已占用）、固态硬盘（PCIe 4，M.2-2280）、第二个固态硬盘插槽（PCIe 4，M.2-2280）、无线局域网模块、BIOS 电池、风扇和电池（用螺丝固定，非胶粘）。
键盘不能轻易更换。要更换键盘，必须更换整个底座顶部，这就需要将笔记本电脑完全拆开。
保修
华硕在德国为这款 18 英寸笔记本电脑提供两年保修服务。将保修期延长至三年将花费约 200 欧元（约合 215 美元）。
输入设备 - 配备 RGB 照明单键的华硕电脑
键盘
发光 Chiclet 键盘的凹面按键键程适中，按压点清晰。按键阻力基本尚可，但主观上可能会稍显清脆。键入时，键盘的右半部分会有一些松动，但最多也只是很小的松动。不过，这并不妨碍打字。一个积极的方面是，所有四个方向键的尺寸都是正常的。总的来说，华硕提供了一款适合日常工作的键盘。
触摸板
点击板（约 13 x 8.5 厘米，约 5.1 x 3.35 英寸）表面光滑，便于手指滑动，可替代鼠标。它的行程短，按压点清晰。
显示屏 - 覆盖 DCI-P3 色彩空间的微型 LED 显示屏
Scar 18 采用 16:10 格式，配备 18 英寸微型 LED 显示屏（2560x1600 像素）。它的优点包括高亮度、出色的对比度和黑色值以及磨砂表面。快速的 240-Hz 面板还支持 HDR 和 G-Sync。
另一方面，该显示器并非完全没有 PWM 闪烁，不过这在日常操作中应该不会有太大影响：我们测量到，在亮度值小于 94 cd/m² 时会出现高频闪烁（5733 Hz）。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NE180QDM-NM1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 968 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 934.2 cd/m² Minimum: 59 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 937 cd/m²
Contrast: 14197:1 (Black: 0.066 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.52 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.21
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
90% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.042
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 18.00 | Alienware m18 R1 AMD BOE NE18NZ1, IPS, 1920x1200, 18.00 | Alienware m18 R1 Chi Mei 180JME, IPS, 1920x1200, 18.00 | Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 AUO45A8 (B180QAN01.2), IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18.00 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -1% | 1% | -3% | -2% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 98.5 -1% | 97.7 -2% | 99.8 0% | 96.9 -3% | 98.1 -2% | 97.2 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.7 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 90 | 88.7 -1% | 89.8 0% | 91.8 2% | 85.3 -5% | 86.2 -4% | 84.9 -6% |
| Response Times | 44% | 41% | -28% | 45% | -230% | 37% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12 ? | 2.8 ? 77% | 3 ? 75% | 7.6 ? 37% | 4.2 ? 65% | 8.6 ? 28% | 5.41 ? 55% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.7 ? | 9.6 ? 10% | 9.9 ? 7% | 17.8 ? -66% | 8 ? 25% | 81.8 ? -664% | 8.62 ? 19% |
| PWM Frequency | 5733 ? | 2509 -56% | 2592 ? -55% | ||||
| Screen | -42% | -64% | -114% | -142% | -85% | -211% | |
| Brightness middle | 937 | 319.6 -66% | 372.8 -60% | 360 -62% | 549.6 -41% | 467.5 -50% | 490 -48% |
| Brightness | 934 | 304 -67% | 367 -61% | 355 -62% | 524 -44% | 459 -51% | 468 -50% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 97 9% | 92 3% | 89 0% | 90 1% | 86 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.066 | 0.25 -279% | 0.32 -385% | 0.21 -218% | 0.53 -703% | 0.54 -718% | |
| Contrast | 14197 | 1278 -91% | 1165 -92% | 1714 -88% | 1037 -93% | 907 -94% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.52 | 1.22 20% | 1.92 -26% | 3.82 -151% | 3.32 -118% | 3.77 -148% | 4.97 -227% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.82 | 3.1 -10% | 3.65 -29% | 7.38 -162% | 6.63 -135% | 6.12 -117% | 11.02 -291% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.21 | 0.47 61% | 0.51 58% | 2.24 -85% | 2.7 -123% | 2.94 -143% | 2.97 -145% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 0.8 53% | 1.5 12% | 5.06 -198% | 2 -18% | 3.2 -88% | 7.2 -324% |
| Gamma | 2.042 108% | 2.23 99% | 2.34 94% | 2.52 87% | 2.29 96% | 2.43 91% | 2.161 102% |
| CCT | 6578 99% | 6471 100% | 6607 98% | 5657 115% | 6319 103% | 6478 100% | 6515 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
-21% | -8% /
-35% | -47% /
-74% | -33% /
-85% | -106% /
-99% | -59% /
-131% |
* ... smaller is better
sRGB 和 DCI-P3 色彩空间完全覆盖，Adobe RGB 色彩空间覆盖率达到 90%，色彩准确度是必然的。由于获得了 Pantone 认证，在交货时色彩再现已经非常出色，偏差为 1.52，达到了 DeltaE < 3 的目标。虽然额外的校准仍能带来些许改进，但这主要涉及到更均衡的灰度。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise | |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 5733 Hz | |
| ≤ 94 cd/m² brightness | ||
The display backlight flickers at 5733 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 94 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 5733 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. Flickering occurs at relatively low brightness settings, so extended use at this brightness setting or lower can cause eyestrain. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | ||
IPS 面板具有稳定的可视角度，几乎可以从任何角度进行阅读。最高亮度高，在户外也能阅读屏幕内容。
性能 - Scar 18 提供高端硬件
华硕 ROG Strix Scar 18 是一款 18 英寸的高端笔记本电脑。由 Raptor Lake Refresh 和 Ada Lovelace 硬件提供必要的计算性能。价格从 3,600 欧元（约合人民币 3,878 元）起，我们目前的测试机售价约为 4,500 欧元（约合人民币 4,848 元）。
测试条件
华硕预置了三种电源模式（见表），你可以使用 Fn + F5 组合键在它们之间切换。我们使用 "性能 "模式进行基准测试，使用 "静音 "模式进行电池测试。GPU 模式设置为 "标准"。笔记本的控制中心（"Armory Crate"）允许创建个人配置文件（"Manual"），包括设置功率限制、动态提升和风扇曲线。
| 性能 | Turbo | 静音 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 110 瓦 | 175 瓦 | 65 瓦 |
| 功率限制 2 (HWInfo) | 120 瓦 | 175 瓦 | 100 瓦 |
| 噪音 (TheWitcher 3) | 50 dB(A) | 56 dB(A) | 35 dB(A) |
| 性能（Witcher 3 ） | ~188 帧/秒 | ~183 帧/秒 | ~68 帧/秒 |
处理器
24 个 CPU 内核（8P + 16E = 32 个线程）的 酷睿 i9-14900HX(Raptor Lake）的 24 个 CPU 内核（8P + 16E = 32 个线程）最高主频可达 5.8 GHz（P 内核）和 4.1 GHz（E 内核）。CPU 在应对持续的多线程负载（CB15 Loop）时，Turbo 速度始终保持在较高水平。有关酷睿 i9 的更多信息，请参阅我们的 分析.
电源配置文件的选择对单线程性能的影响有限，但对多线程性能的影响更大。选择 "Performance（性能）"会导致基准值低于目前确定的 CPU 平均值，而选择 "Turbo（涡轮增压）"则会使结果略高于平均值。单线程性能与日常运行更为相关，在电源和电池运行时处于相同水平，但在电池运行时多线程性能明显下降。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4024 (3961.18-4098.11)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø5466 (5377.07-5540.93)
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4934 (4579.8-4989.4)
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4541 (4495.39-4584.53)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4753 (4700.35-4782.4)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4735 (4684.94-4780.69)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX; Turbo: Ø4413 (4296.46-4685.17)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 6.2 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W -2! | |
| Alienware m18 R1 -2! | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 -2! | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (Turbo) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8427 - 12419, n=23) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=232, last 2 years) | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (Turbo) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (779 - 859, n=23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=232, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (Turbo) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3263 - 4875, n=24) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=237, last 2 years) | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (287 - 320, n=24) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (Turbo) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=236, last 2 years) | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (102 - 164, n=23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (Turbo) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Geekbench 6.2 | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (6.2.1, Turbo) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (15849 - 18643, n=23) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (6.2.1) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Average of class Gaming (5340 - 18590, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (6.2.1, Turbo) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (6.2.1) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2800 - 3095, n=23) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (6.2.1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1599 - 3095, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (Turbo) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (22.7 - 34.4, n=23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=234, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=228, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (6.3.4.2) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (33.9 - 85.1, n=23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (6.3.4.2) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD (6.3.4.2) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (6.3.4.2, Turbo) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=231, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (0.3609 - 0.4225, n=23) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (Turbo) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD (v6.85.6300) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 (v6.85.6300) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (17244 - 29351, n=22) | |
| Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD (v6.85.6300) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (88537 - 148888, n=22) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD (v6.85.6300) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (4267 - 7229, n=22) | |
| Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD (v6.85.6300) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (118405 - 148773, n=22) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD (v6.85.6300) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W (v6.85.6300) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (12217 - 18256, n=22) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD (v6.85.6300) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 (v6.85.6300) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (43302 - 72594, n=22) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD (v6.85.6300) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (86964 - 241777, n=22) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD (v6.85.6300) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W (v6.85.6300) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1265 - 2149, n=22) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD (v6.85.6300) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 (v6.85.6300) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (9170 - 16128, n=22) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Alienware m18 R1 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v6.92.6600, Turbo) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (33960 - 51118, n=22) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=228, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD (v6.85.6300) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
系统性能
运行流畅的系统在计算性能方面没有任何不足，笔记本电脑可以完美地处理游戏、渲染和其他任务。工作内存的传输速率处于 DDR5-5600 内存的正常水平。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (8201 - 9234, n=8) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10871 - 11628, n=8) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9951 - 11759, n=8) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (13219 - 16462, n=8) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1877 - 2238, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1738 - 2113, n=7) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2195 - 2543, n=7) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1478 - 2327, n=7) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (322 - 339, n=7) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (287 - 309, n=5) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Gaming (421 - 824, n=211, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (430 - 467, n=8) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8801 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (56992 - 83392, n=22) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (54443 - 87507, n=22) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (51387 - 78199, n=22) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=224, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (79.7 - 105, n=22) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
标准化的延迟监控测试（网上冲浪、4K 视频重现和 Prime95 高负载）显示了一些明显的行为，系统似乎并不适合实时视频和音频处理。未来的软件更新可能会带来一些改进，甚至可能使情况变得更糟。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
Scar 18 可接受两块 M.2-2280 格式的 PCIe 4 SSD，还支持 RAID-0。我们测试设备的 2-TB 三星固态硬盘提供了出色的数据传输速率。另一个积极的方面是，它没有任何因热引起的节流现象。
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7069 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5266 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
720.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
554.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
4233 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
4449 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
83.15 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
230.9 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7049 (6155.14-7094.74)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6298 (5315.65-6330.46)
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6876 (6139.41-6939.27)
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø1601 (1116.1-6275.7)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6845 (5855.67-6875.3)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12928 (8511.29-13109.92)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0): Ø10730 (8845.37-10809.96)
图形卡
使用 GeForce RTX 4090华硕采用了 Nvidia 当前移动 GPU 中的顶级型号。它提供 9,728 个着色器单元、256 位存储总线，还可以使用快速 GDDR6 存储（16,384 MB）。RTX 4090 的最大 TGP 为 175 瓦（150 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost），不可能再高了。
在 "Performance（性能）"模式下，基准测试结果低于迄今为止为 RTX 4090 确定的平均值，而 "Turbo（加速）"模式下的结果与平均值处于同一水平。支持高级 Optimus，在 dGPU 和 Optimus 之间切换无需重启。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 42985 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 65110 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 33620 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 19507 points | |
Help | ||
Blender | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2 | V-Ray 5 Benchmark | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | SPECviewperf 2020
| V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | |
| GPU | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (873 - 1334, n=25) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=189, last 2 years) | |
| CPU | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (18206 - 37629, n=25) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2741 - 37629, n=189, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Scar 18 允许在最高设置下进行 QHD+ 游戏。如果连接相应的显示器，还可使用更高分辨率。支持 DLSS 3 和 Frame Generation 的游戏允许在 4k 分辨率下使用最高设置和额外的光线追踪效果。
在 "性能 "模式下，我们测试的游戏帧率低于目前确定的 RTX 4090 平均帧率。选择 "Turbo"（加速）模式可以略微提高帧率，"Ultimate"（终极）GPU 模式也是如此。
Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (139.2 - 216, n=32) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=229, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty | Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 | The Finals | Palworld | Enshrouded
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (95.4 - 144.7, n=13) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (83.4 - 103.9, n=13) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (32.9 - 103.9, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (65.5 - 75.5, n=8) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (11.9 - 75.5, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (162 - 205, n=6) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (41 - 205, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Extreme Preset | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (123 - 162, n=6) | |
| Average of class Gaming (56 - 162, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| The Finals | |
| 1920x1080 Epic Preset | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (174.1 - 211, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (51.3 - 211, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Epic Preset | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (137.2 - 147.4, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (82.8 - 147.4, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic RTX Global Illumination | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (159.8 - 190.8, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (51.1 - 190.8, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Palworld | |
| 1920x1080 Epic Preset AA:TSR | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (138.8 - 150.9, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21.1 - 150.9, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Epic Preset AA:TSR | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (110.5 - 119.8, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (69.1 - 119.8, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Enshrouded | |
| 1920x1080 Max. Quality AA:FX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (79 - 101.5, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21.3 - 101.5, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Max. Quality AA:FX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (61.8 - 76, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (42.3 - 76, n=5, last 2 years) | |
为了评估帧频是否在较长时间内保持相当稳定，我们以全高清分辨率和最高质量设置运行游戏 "TheWitcher 3"约 60 分钟。游戏角色没有移动。我们没有观察到帧速率有任何下降。
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø181.9 (172-189)
Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M: Ø174 (67-188)
Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø197.9 (178-214)
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø173.6 (165-186)
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.4 (98-112)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø201 (189-215)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
| GTA V (2015) | 187.5 | 187.1 | 181.2 | 136 | 129.6 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 579.6 | 501.7 | 342.8 | 189.4 | 151.5 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 219 | 194.5 | 173.9 | 161.3 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 221 | 198.1 | 166.1 | 143.6 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 197.9 | 172.4 | 136.8 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 176 | 163 | 156 | 145 | 145 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 429 | 350 | 341 | 331 | 279 |
| Starfield (2023) | 112.7 | 100 | 84.2 | 78.4 | 66 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 134.8 | 121.5 | 117.7 | 112.1 | 83.8 |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) | 229 | 210 | 169 | 162 | 162 |
| The Finals (2023) | 228 | 216 | 214 | 211 | 147.4 |
| Palworld (2024) | 211 | 180.9 | 151.3 | 150.9 | 119.8 |
| Enshrouded (2024) | 135.2 | 120.1 | 100.8 | 87.6 | 68.9 |
排放 - G834JYR 可以安静地运行
噪音排放
在 "性能 "模式下，满载时的噪音水平最高可达 52 dB(A)。在 "涡轮增压 "模式下，噪音值甚至会略微增加。 轿跑 18（2023 年进行比较，结果也是如此。在一般情况下，它的运行也可以更安静：如果选择 "静音 "模式而放弃性能，噪音水平会降低到 35 dB(A)。在空闲或日常操作（办公、上网）时，两个风扇中往往只有一个在运转，偶尔两个风扇都保持静音，尤其是在使用 "静音 "配置文件时。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 27 / 28 / 32 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 50 / 52 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M | Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | 12% | 6% | 10% | 5% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 22.4 7% | 22.8 5% | 23 4% | 23.5 2% | 22.8 5% | 23.9 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 27 | 23 15% | 23 15% | 23 15% | 23.8 12% | 23.8 12% | 23.9 11% |
| Idle Average * | 28 | 23.4 16% | 23 18% | 23 18% | 23.8 15% | 23.8 15% | 32.6 -16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32 | 33.5 -5% | 23 28% | 23 28% | 26.8 16% | 28 12% | 32.6 -2% |
| Load Average * | 50 | 33.5 33% | 35.6 29% | 45.26 9% | 37.3 25% | 38 24% | 35.9 28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 53.6 -7% | 51.3 -3% | 59.82 -20% | 48 4% | 57.3 -15% | |
| Load Maximum * | 52 | 53.6 -3% | 56.7 -9% | 59.94 -15% | 53.5 -3% | 62.8 -21% | 55.8 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
压力测试和Witcher 3 测试会导致笔记本电脑明显升温，但不会过高。在某些情况下，温度会超过 50 ºC (122 ºF)。不过，在日常操作（办公、上网）中，温度保持在绿色范围内。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Alienware m18 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, AMD Radeon RX 7900M | Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 8% | 13% | -8% | 7% | 2% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 49 | 40.2 18% | 39 20% | 35 29% | 39.2 20% | 37.8 23% | 54 -10% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 47 | 37.4 20% | 36.4 23% | 56 -19% | 35.6 24% | 37.6 20% | 46 2% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 31.6 -9% | 29.2 -1% | 34 -17% | 31.8 -10% | 34.8 -20% | 30 -3% |
| Idle Bottom * | 31 | 30.6 1% | 27.8 10% | 39 -26% | 33.2 -7% | 36 -16% | 31 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
压力测试（Prime95 和 Furmark 持续运行）是评估系统在满负荷情况下稳定性的极端场景。CPU 的最高速度为 2.5 至 2.6 GHz（P 内核）和 2.2 至 2.3 GHz（E 内核）。图形处理器（1.9 至 2 GHz）几乎以全速开始测试，随着测试的继续，速度略有下降。此外，GPU 还经常出现明显的节流。
发言人
四个扬声器共同发出的声音非常动听。要获得更好的声音体验，您可以使用耳机或外置扬声器。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 华硕 ROG 的电池续航能力相当出色
耗电量
在Witcher 3 测试期间，功耗保持在预期水平，而在压力测试期间，功耗会发生变化。这种变化可追溯到 GPU 速度经常大幅降低。330 瓦充电器提供了充足的电力。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
| Idle | 14 / 17 / 24 Watt |
| Load |
143 / 302 Watt |
   
| |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M | Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -112% | -48% | -4% | -40% | -40% | -35% | 3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 14 | 30.3 -116% | 21.6 -54% | 16 -14% | 24.5 -75% | 13.2 6% | 17.3 -24% | 13.8 ? 1% |
| Idle Average * | 17 | 55.6 -227% | 25.2 -48% | 19 -12% | 34.1 -101% | 25.4 -49% | 27 -59% | 19.2 ? -13% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24 | 101.1 -321% | 56.7 -136% | 21.3 11% | 47.7 -99% | 53.5 -123% | 46 -92% | 27 ? -13% |
| Load Average * | 143 | 160.3 -12% | 164.1 -15% | 124 13% | 140 2% | 151.4 -6% | 133 7% | 111.3 ? 22% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 251 | 216 14% | 311 -24% | 289 -15% | 202 20% | 336 -34% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 302 | 332.1 -10% | 338.9 -12% | 319 -6% | 261 14% | 395.2 -31% | 329 -9% | 251 ? 17% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø251 (239-263)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø243 (122.5-294)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø17.2 (14-24)
Power Consumption With External Monitor
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø164.9 (153.4-207)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø177.1 (176.1-179.1)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø220 (209-265)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø244 (231-263)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø30.6 (27.4-35.5)
电池寿命
在通过脚本加载网站的 WLAN 测试和持续循环播放短片 Big Buck Bunny（H.264 编码，FHD）的视频测试中，18 英寸笔记本电脑的运行时间分别为 7:41 小时和 7:27 小时。因此，尽管 Scar 18 的部分电池容量较大，但其整体性能非常出色，能够大幅超越竞争对手。
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M, 97 Wh | Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 91.7 Wh | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -62% | -44% | -15% | -25% | -31% | -13% | -8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 612 | 268 -56% | 334 -45% | 420 -31% | 353 -42% | 546 ? -11% | ||
| H.264 | 447 | 290 -35% | 419 -6% | 400 ? -11% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 461 | 85 -82% | 260 -44% | 264 -43% | 240 -48% | 252 -45% | 428 -7% | 368 ? -20% |
| Load | 77 | 41 -47% | 44 -43% | 103 34% | 80 4% | 72 -6% | 56 -27% | 84.7 ? 10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 53 | 80.6 ? |
Pros
+ 高亮度、高对比度微型 LED 显示屏（16:10，18 英寸）
+ 高系统性能
+ PCIe 4 固态硬盘（2 TB）
+ 支持 RAID-0
+ 雷电 4
+ 电力传输
+ 电池寿命长
Cons
- 只有一个 Thunderbolt 端口
- 没有存储卡读卡器
- 微弱的网络摄像头（0.9MP）
- 背面没有连接
- 底座本应更坚固
- 底座由塑料制成
- 价格昂贵
结论 - 有改进的余地
视频和图像处理、流媒体、渲染和游戏是笔记本电脑的主要使用场景。虽然 GeForce RTX 4090和 酷睿 i9-14900HX提供了必要的性能，但它们并没有创下任何新纪录。它们的排放量处于该级别设备通常的高水平。
凭借 ROG Strix Scar 18（2024），华硕以高昂的价格推出了一款功能强大的高端笔记本电脑。
这款笔记本电脑的亮点在于其对角线为 18 英寸、16:10 格式的迷你 LED 显示屏（2560x1600 像素、DCI-P3、杜比视界、240 Hz）。它的优点包括最高亮度接近 1,000 cd/m²，黑色值非常好，色彩准确度高。
USB-C 端口（1 个 USB 3.2 Gen 2、1 个 Thunderbolt 4）便于将其集成到现有的工作场所设置中，并提供了一些扩展选项，如外置 GPU 或扩展坞。两个 USB-C 端口均可用于 DisplayPort 信号输出，USB 3.2 Gen 2 端口还支持 Power Delivery。所有这一切都离不开出色的电池续航能力。
另一个选择可能是 微星 Titan 18 HX A14VIG，它能从相同的 CPU/GPU 组合中获得稍高的性能，提供 4k miniLED 显示屏，并配有两个 TB4 端口。不过，微星笔记本电脑的电池续航时间远不及 Strix。
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024)
-
02/07/2024 v7
Sascha Mölck
Gaming - Weighted Average
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
