联想ThinkPad E485 (Ryzen 5, Vega 8) 笔记本电脑评测

Name: Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Brand: Lenovo

故意放水？ 除A系列外，联想还提供更实惠的配备AMD处理器的E系列。我们测试了AMD版本的ThinkPad如何与英特尔竞争对手竞争，并评估了具有双通道RAM的配置是否能带来任何优势。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 06/12/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Ultrabook Windows ThinkPad

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE

Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4 x 2 - 3.6 GHz, Zen

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), Core: 1100 MHz, Memory: 1200 MHz

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2400，单通道，板载, max. 64 GB

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, B140HAN04.2, IPS, glossy: no

Mainboard

AMD CZ FCH

Storage

Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB

Soundcard

AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD

Networking

Realtek RTL8168B/8111B (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 21.9 x 329 x 242

Battery

45 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3 cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 六排巧克力无背光键盘, Keyboard Light: no, 65W USB-C电源, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.812 kg, Power Supply: 356 g

Price

650 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA Dell Latitude 3490 Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA DIN A4 ❌

Left: USB-C 3.1 Gen.2 (with alternative DisplayPort mode), HDMI 1.4b, 2x USB 3.0 Gen.1 (1x powered), 3.5 mm audio

Right: microSD reader, USB 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, provision for security lock

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	77.1 MB/s +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	76.1 MB/s +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	73.8 MB/s
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	64.8 MB/s -12%
Average of class Office (8 - 82.7, n=49, last 2 years)	53 MB/s -28%
Dell Latitude 3490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	23.6 MB/s -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	87.3 MB/s +5%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	85.6 MB/s +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	82.8 MB/s
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	81.9 MB/s -1%
Average of class Office (25 - 90.5, n=43, last 2 years)	64.7 MB/s -22%
Dell Latitude 3490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	24.4 MB/s -71%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Office (819 - 842, n=2, last 2 years)	831 MBit/s +150%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA Intel Wireless-AC 9560	670 MBit/s +102%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	614 MBit/s +85%
Dell Latitude 3490 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	536 (538^P1) MBit/s +61%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	332 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	300 MBit/s -10%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Office (883 - 972, n=2, last 2 years)	928 MBit/s +205%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	636 MBit/s +109%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA Intel Wireless-AC 9560	633 MBit/s +108%
Dell Latitude 3490 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	580 (584^P1) MBit/s +91%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	306 MBit/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	304 MBit/s


252 cd/m²	278 cd/m²	254 cd/m²
267 cd/m²	289 cd/m²	264 cd/m²
282 cd/m²	277 cd/m²	272 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

B140HAN04.2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 289 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 270.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 289 cd/m²
Contrast: 1521:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.7
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.48% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.96

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE B140HAN04.2, , 1920x1080, 14.00	Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW Innolux N140HCA-EAC, , 1920x1080, 14.00	HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA Innolux N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14.00	Dell Latitude 3490 LP140WF6 / LGD059D, , 1920x1080, 14.00	HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA LG Philips, LGD05F1, , 1920x1080, 14.00
Display		6%	4%	2%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	39.21 38.48	41.56 6%	40.67 4%	39.81 2%	38.08 -3%
sRGB Coverage	58.8 57.9	62.2 6%	61.2 4%	59.6 1%	57.2 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	40.52 39.76	42.96 6%	42.03 4%	41.16 2%	39.37 -3%
Response Times		4%	25%	24%	13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	44.8 ?(20.4, 24.4)	44.8 ?(23.6, 21.2) -0%	33 ?(14, 19) 26%	36.4 ?(18.8, 17.6) 19%	41.6 ?(22.8, 18.8) 7%
Response Time Black / White *	33.6 ?(18, 15.6)	31.2 ?(17.2, 14) 7%	26 ?(16, 10) 23%	24 ?(13.2, 10.8) 29%	27.2 ?(15.6, 11.6) 19%
PWM Frequency		25000 ?(30)	100 ?(30)
Screen		-20%	-27%	-12%	-12%
Brightness middle	289	262 -9%	225 -22%	250 -13%	256 -11%
Brightness	271	245 -10%	209 -23%	241 -11%	238 -12%
Brightness Distribution	87	83 -5%	89 2%	81 -7%	85 -2%
Black Level *	0.19	0.19 -0%	0.68 -258%	0.25 -32%	0.23 -21%
Contrast	1521	1379 -9%	331 -78%	1000 -34%	1113 -27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.6	7 -25%	4.54 19%	5.5 2%	6.2 -11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	20.8	23.6 -13%	7.2 65%	23.5 -13%	18.2 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.7		2.87 39%	4.8 -2%	5.2 -11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	6.4 -137%	4.14 -53%	3.5 -30%	3.8 -41%
Gamma	1.96 ^112%	2.14 ^103%	2.13 ^103%	2.27 ^97%	2.5 ^88%
CCT	6506 ^100%	6065 ^107%	6624 ^98%	7049 ^92%	6643 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	37.2	39.5 6%	39 5%	37.9 2%	36.1 -3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	58.5	61.9 6%	61 4%	59.4 2%	56.9 -3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-3% / -11%	1% / -15%	5% / -5%	-1% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.4 ms rise
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.


197 cd/m²	212 cd/m²	204 cd/m²
195 cd/m²	221 cd/m²	201 cd/m²
167 cd/m²	184 cd/m²	164 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Innolux N140HCA-EAC tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 221 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 193.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 74 %
Center on Battery: 168 cd/m²
Contrast: 1163:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.81 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.24

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Office (82.6 - 284, n=118, last 2 years)	218 Points +56%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA Intel Core i7-8565U	180 Points +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW Intel Core i5-8250U	144 Points +3%
Dell Latitude 3490 Intel Core i5-8250U	143 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	139.5 Points
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U	139 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U (124 - 142, n=15)	136.2 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Office (160.8 - 2642, n=120, last 2 years)	1405 Points +127%
Dell Latitude 3490 Intel Core i5-8250U	646 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	618 (591.81^min - 618.71^max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U (510 - 642, n=16)	598 Points -3%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA Intel Core i7-8565U	593 (540^min - 585.81^max) Points -4%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U	589 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW Intel Core i5-8250U	540 Points -13%

Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP: Ø598 (591.81-618.71)

Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G: Ø507 (502.8-539.23)

HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA Vega 8, R5 PRO 2500U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G: Ø510 (500.53-589.09)

Dell Latitude 3490 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 M.2: Ø596 (586.36-637.92)

HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G: Ø535 (519.49-572.2)

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

139.5 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

618 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

51.5 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8 | PCMark 10

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, 8192	4458 Points +26%
Average of class Office (2304 - 4830, n=12, last 2 years)	4261 Points +20%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384	4071 Points +15%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 8192	3594 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096	3574 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192	3550 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (3049 - 3550, n=14)	3340 Points -6%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384	5160 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192	4870 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096	4849 Points 0%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 8192	4647 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (3437 - 4870, n=11)	4211 Points -14%
Average of class Office (1854 - 5610, n=12, last 2 years)	3746 Points -23%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384	5124 Points +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096	4618 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192	4249 Points
Average of class Office (2111 - 5088, n=5, last 2 years)	4168 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (3126 - 4249, n=6)	3627 Points -15%

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Office (2325 - 7157, n=105, last 2 years)	5348 Points +61%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384	4015 Points +21%
Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, 8192	3619 Points +9%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 8192	3376 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192	3321 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (2501 - 3685, n=12)	3182 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096	2279 Points -31%
Essentials
Average of class Office (5095 - 20841, n=105, last 2 years)	9832 Points +48%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384	7897 Points +19%
Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, 8192	7458 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096	6999 Points +5%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 8192	6825 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192	6646 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (5288 - 7272, n=12)	6483 Points -2%
Productivity
Average of class Office (3041 - 10198, n=105, last 2 years)	7449 Points +50%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384	7230 Points +46%
Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, 8192	5930 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096	5555 Points +12%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 8192	5235 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192	4964 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (3113 - 5574, n=12)	4571 Points -8%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Office (1912 - 9056, n=105, last 2 years)	5810 Points +93%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 16384	3076 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 8192	3014 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (2351 - 3363, n=12)	2971 Points -1%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 8192	2924 Points -3%
Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, 8192	2909 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, 4096	2680 Points -11%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3550 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4249 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4870 points
PCMark 10 Score		3321 points
Help

	Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G	HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	Dell Latitude 3490 SK hynix SC311 M.2	HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	Average Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
AS SSD		-82%	-47%	-45%	-2%	-59%
Score Total	2478	638 -74%	1290 -48%	1006 -59%	2040 -18%	2565 ?(35 - 4653, n=61) 4%
Score Write	575	182 -68%	323 -44%	387 -33%	669 16%	587 ?(48 - 1029, n=61) 2%
Score Read	1277	324 -75%	638 -50%	409 -68%	954 -25%	1378 ?(363 - 2545, n=61) 8%
Access Time Write *	0.059	0.235 -298%	0.063 -7%	0.052 12%	0.047 20%	0.4637 ?(0.023 - 4.15, n=61) -686%
Access Time Read *	0.054	0.106 -96%	0.144 -167%	0.097 -80%	0.067 -24%	0.06777 ?(0.04 - 0.49, n=61) -26%
4K-64 Write	371.5	92.1 -75%	216 -42%	286.1 -23%	499.5 34%	419 ?(15.3 - 1652, n=61) 13%
4K-64 Read	1035	190.9 -82%	433.3 -58%	332.7 -68%	724 -30%	1112 ?(199.4 - 2280, n=61) 7%
4K Write	63.9	78.9 23%	76.8 20%	68.9 8%	119.7 87%	91.6 ?(1.16 - 161.4, n=61) 43%
4K Read	38.63	31.13 -19%	25.35 -34%	27.67 -28%	31.17 -19%	45.1 ?(20.7 - 54.1, n=61) 17%
Seq Write	1395	115.4 -92%	305.2 -78%	318.8 -77%	493.6 -65%	960 ?(223 - 1395, n=61) -31%
Seq Read	2030	1015 -50%	1797 -11%	484.7 -76%	1983 -2%	2019 ?(768 - 2834, n=61) -1%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP

Sequential Read: 1668 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1423 MB/s

512K Read: 1011 MB/s

512K Write: 871 MB/s

4K Read: 43.49 MB/s

4K Write: 75.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 283.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 205.6 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Office (1474 - 13132, n=113, last 2 years)	6062 Points +120%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 16384	3756 Points +36%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (1668 - 4317, n=44)	3447 Points +25%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, 8192	2954 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 8192	2757 Points
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U, 16384	1815 Points -34%
Dell Latitude 3490 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U, 8192	1634 Points -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U, 4096	1518 Points -45%

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Office (712 - 9228, n=114, last 2 years)	4191 Points +154%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 16384	2429 Points +47%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (1095 - 2901, n=41)	2224 Points +35%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, 8192	1775 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, 8192	1647 Points
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U, 16384	1191 Points -28%
Dell Latitude 3490 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U, 8192	956 Points -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U, 4096	882 Points -46%

3DMark 11 Performance		2807 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		7035 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1469 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite | Rise of the Tomb Raider

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 8192	22.35 fps +69%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, 16384	19.5 fps +47%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (7.6 - 28, n=30)	17.6 fps +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, 8192	13.26 fps
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, 8192	12.7 fps -4%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 16384	8.2 fps -38%
Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 8192	7.66 fps -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 4096	6.8 fps -49%

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1024x768 Lowest Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, 16384	47.2 fps +55%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (27.7 - 49.3, n=10)	37.2 fps +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, 8192	30.4 fps
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, 8192	29.9 fps -2%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 16384	20.6 fps -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 4096	16.9 fps -44%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, 16384	14.8 fps +37%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (5.9 - 15.4, n=11)	12.1 fps +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, 8192	10.8 fps
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, 8192	10.6 fps -2%
HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 16384	6.9 fps -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 4096	5.9 fps -45%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	74.4			13.26
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	30.4		10.8
Doom (2016)	25.1		10.4
Civilization VI (2016)	56.3		12.4
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)	26.5	9.1

Noise Level

Idle		29.4 / 29.4 / 31.2 dB(A)
Load		32.7 / 35.3 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29.4 dB(A)

	Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G	HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA Vega 8, R5 PRO 2500U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	Dell Latitude 3490 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 M.2	HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Noise		2%	-4%	-7%	2%
off / environment *	29.4	29.1 1%	30.8 -5%	29.8 -1%	29.4 -0%
Idle Minimum *	29.4	29.1 1%	30.8 -5%	29.8 -1%	29.4 -0%
Idle Average *	29.4	29.1 1%	30.8 -5%	29.8 -1%	29.4 -0%
Idle Maximum *	31.2	30.3 3%	30.8 1%	29.8 4%	30.2 3%
Load Average *	32.7	31.8 3%	34.7 -6%	39.1 -20%	31.8 3%
Load Maximum *	35.3	33.8 4%	36.4 -3%	44.3 -25%	33.1 6%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


37 °C	38.2 °C	42.3 °C
33.5 °C	33.9 °C	33.8 °C
24.5 °C	24.8 °C	25.2 °C

Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 32.6 °C


43.2 °C	45.2 °C	38 °C
37.6 °C	39 °C	39.8 °C
24.3 °C	24.7 °C	24 °C

Maximum: 45.2 °C
Average: 35.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 33.6 °C | Room Temperature 19.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.7 °C / 78.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+2 °C / 3.6 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.43 / 0.57 Watt
Idle	6.2 / 8.6 / 9.7 Watt
Load	37.4 / 44.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	Average of class Office
Power Consumption		29%	-9%	8%	24%	-0%	2%
Idle Minimum *	6.2	3.5 44%	7.2 -16%	3.2 48%	2.98 52%	5.68 ?(3.7 - 11.5, n=42) 8%	4.3 ?(2.2 - 9.6, n=107, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Average *	8.6	5.3 38%	9.7 -13%	5.5 36%	5.4 37%	8.75 ?(5.86 - 21.8, n=42) -2%	7.35 ?(3.8 - 20.6, n=107, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Maximum *	9.7	6.1 37%	10.3 -6%	8.1 16%	7.9 19%	10.1 ?(6.36 - 22.2, n=42) -4%	9.15 ?(5.1 - 23.9, n=107, last 2 years) 6%
Load Average *	37.4	30 20%	42 -12%	40.8 -9%	34.5 8%	37.8 ?(24.1 - 55.3, n=42) -1%	41.1 ?(8.7 - 77.9, n=106, last 2 years) -10%
Load Maximum *	44.8	42.3 6%	44.2 1%	68.1 -52%	43.3 3%	46.2 ?(26.5 - 65.6, n=42) -3%	58.1 ?(11.1 - 101.4, n=107, last 2 years) -30%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		9h 05min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 41)		5h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 41min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 05min

	Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, 45 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh	HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, 48 Wh	Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh	HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh	Average of class Office
Battery Runtime		61%	1%	115%	78%	109%
Reader / Idle	545	1106 103%	560 3%		1024 88%	1436 ?(527 - 2359, n=21, last 2 years) 163%
H.264	341	431 26%	253 -26%		458 34%	705 ?(348 - 1112, n=40, last 2 years) 107%
WiFi v1.3	323	495 53%	290 -10%	694 115%	504 56%	594 ?(300 - 1137, n=107, last 2 years) 84%
Load	65	105 62%	88 35%		151 132%	117.7 ?(56 - 218, n=67, last 2 years) 81%

Pros

+ 坚固的机身

+ 出色的键盘

+ 不错的IPS屏幕

+ 比较安静

+ 系统性能强

+ 价格低廉

Cons

- -没有键盘背光（甚至不能选配）

- 仅有microSD读卡器

- AMD处理器并未充分发挥其潜力

- 只有单通道RAM

- 在某些部件中，用料不如E480 / E490

- 只有12个月保修

联想ThinkPad E485笔记本电脑评测. Test unit provided by campuspoint.

ThinkPad E485给人的印象略显复杂。它本身就是一款坚固的入门级商用笔记本电脑，具有坚固的外壳，漂亮的显示屏和出色的输入设备。但是，如果将它与ThinkPad E480（与Intel处理器相同的型号）进行比较，则存在一些差异。我们主要讲的是缺少键盘背光，甚至不作为选项提供，还有基座单元顶部的塑料材料质量稍差。有时候我们觉得制造商想要人为地将它与英特尔车型保持距离。

当然ThinkPad E485的价格较低，大多数用户应该能够忍受材料上的差异。另一个问题是稍微差一点的硬件。虽然每个人都知道集成的AMD GPU可以从双通道RAM中得到性能提升，但遗憾的是，所有OEM型号都是单通道。虽然您可以相对容易地升级，但原则上8 GB应该足以满足许多用户的需求，而更多RAM也需要更多预算。如果联想直接内置两个4 GB模块，情况会好一些。但最重要的问题可能是更高的功耗导致电池寿命缩短。这是否仅仅是由于缺乏优化或AMD的功耗更大我们不能确定。

错失的机会：与其英特尔兄弟相比，ThinkPad E485显示出与AMD处理器无关的一些弱点。例如，为什么没有键盘背光这一点我们难以理解。然而，对于任何能够忍受这种情况以及更短的电池续航时间的人，ThinkPad E485是一台性价比和可靠性都很高的入门设备。

ThinkPad E485还提供了一系列优势，而这个优惠价格在这个价格范围内并不是特定的。该处理器为大多数任务提供了足够的性能，并且由于三星的快速SSD，您可以期待在日常操作中具有快速的响应能力。此外，它还有一个不错的IPS显示屏（但是，根据供应商的不同，可能会有一些小的差异）。基于其较低的售价，我们还是可以推荐E485的。

更新：不幸的是，Innolux屏幕在我们的测试中比AU Optronics的模型更糟糕，特别是在亮度方面。使用Innolux屏幕，整体评估分数将从86.4降至85.8％。不幸的是，您在购买设备时对所使用的屏幕面板没有任何知情权，您需要“抽奖”。

Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE - 2019-04-05 04/05/2019 v6^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

85 / 98 → 86%

Keyboard

88%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

51 / 80 → 63%

Weight

65 / 20-67 → 96%

Battery

84%

Display

85%

Games Performance

63 / 68 → 93%

Application Performance

89 / 92 → 97%

Temperature

91%

Noise

96%

Audio

64%

Camera

42 / 85 → 49%

Average

76%

86%

Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 510 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想ThinkPad E485 (Ryzen 5, Vega 8) 笔记本电脑评测

Andreas Osthoff, 2019-06-12 (Update: 2019-06-12)