惠普Omen 16笔记本电脑回顾。强大的RTX 3070游戏笔记本有不必要的缺点

惠普Omen 16是今年新推出的。旧的Omen 15仍然没有看到直接的继承者。相反,惠普为一个15.6英寸的机箱安装了一个16.1英寸的显示屏。因此,现在的边框更小,而且机箱的结构也有小的差别。与去年的机型相比,当然也有CPU (Tiger Lake)和GPU ( RTX 3000 )的升级。
当然,我们将把我们的测试设备与它的前辈,即 HP Omen 15 (Ryzen 4000和RTX 2060)和它的新兄弟姐妹,即 惠普Victus 16(Ryzen 5000和RTX 3060)。.此外,我们还选择了装备类似的 联想Legion 5 Pro 16以及更昂贵的 Alienware x15 R1和 MSI Katana GF66 11UG作为我们比较的设备。
Potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.6 % | 10/2021 | HP Omen 16-b0085ng i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
82.8 % | HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
84.3 % | 10/2021 | HP Victus 16-e0179ng R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % | 08/2021 | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 26.85 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.2 % | 10/2021 | Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
79.2 % | 09/2021 | MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
底座 - 惠普Omen的小更新
底盘与去年的模型几乎没有什么不同。例如,材料、端口布局或设计变化方面的差异只有在仔细检查后才会发现。
底座现在几乎完全由发黑的金属组成,显示屏框架由硬塑料制成,而边框则由较软的塑料制成,是一块真正的指纹磁铁。虽然金属底座在少量的压力下会略微弯曲,而且显示屏相当容易扭曲,然后导致IPS屏幕上出现严重的出血现象,但它总体上给人一种非常坚实的印象。
虽然盖子可以单手打开,但两个铰链可以更牢固以更好地防止摇晃。
与Omen 15相比,Omen 16的宽度和深度略大。虽然宽度差不多,但惠普Victus的深度要长1厘米左右。然而,其他15英寸的竞争对手并不一定更紧凑。虽然Omen 16和Victus 16比15英寸机型更宽,但Legion 5 Pro和Alienware在深度上都更长。
最后,与Omen 15相比,Omen 16增加了200克,这仍然使它比大多数竞争对手更轻。
连接性 - Thunderbolt 4,否则只有USB 3.0
尽管右撇子用户会很高兴听到在机箱右侧的最顶端只有两个USB-A接口,但它们之间的空间太小了,甚至只是一个小的滑盖式U盘都无法放在更小的USB鼠标线旁边。
其余的端口位于左侧,间距也非常紧凑,这可能会导致电缆阻碍附近的接口。值得庆幸的是,这种分布方式(如USB-A旁边的miniDP)应该能大部分解决这个问题。前面和后面都没有端口。
带有Thunderbolt 4和type-C外形尺寸的USB 4端口是一个优点。尽管剩下的三个USB-A端口被惠普标记为 "超高速",但只支持3.0标准。
弹簧式读卡器可以接受全尺寸的SD卡。它们几乎完全消失在机箱内,没有不必要地突出它。
SD卡阅读器
SD卡阅读器的传输往往低于平均水平。从我们的参考存储卡AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60复制1GB的图片到桌面需要将近18秒。平均来说,我们数据库中的游戏笔记本都配备了明显更快的型号,更昂贵的Alienware显示了在速度方面的可能性。在光谱的另一端,有联想和微星,两者都没有SD卡读卡器。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (48.5 - 209, n=92, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (72 - 269, n=83, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
除了1-Gbps的LAN,Omen 16还通过其英特尔AX210模块支持Wi-Fi 6E。后者能够达到千兆的速度,只是与我们的期望相差甚远。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (675 - 1602, n=27) | |
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1580, n=70, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (914 - 1716, n=27) | |
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1700, n=70, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
网络摄像头
惠普已经解决了一个720p的网络摄像头。有了惠普宽视角,摄像头可以捕捉到88度的角度,导致很多环境都可以看到,而不是一个人占满屏幕。这对于视频通话来说可能是可取的,也可能是不可取的。
其他方面的质量与市场上的低标准相匹配,图像比较有颗粒感,颜色也很模糊。自动亮度表现得很奇怪,最初对人脸过度曝光,但片刻之后又严厉地调整亮度曲线,这使得背景看起来特别暗。

安全问题
Omen 16缺少Kensington锁和指纹传感器。由于采用了CPU,当然支持TPM 2.0。
配件和保修
维护
担保金
惠普提供标准的12个月有限硬件保修,以及1年的软件和初始设置有限技术支持。如果需要的话,可以通过现场硬件支持等选项来延长保修期。
输入设备--用户对触摸板,请回复!
键盘
与惠普Victus 16不同的是,Omen 16没有配备数字键盘,这意味着有更多的空间给箭头、pos1、结束等键以及右上方的专用打印屏幕键,这对于截图非常方便。键盘布局看起来非常有条理,这可能是可用空间的结果,而且按键符号很容易阅读。有一个特殊的键用于启动Omen Gaming Hub,在那里可以调整性能设置(风扇、性能配置文件)。
电源键在F12和Del键之间的特殊按键行的位置似乎不是最佳的,但在我们的测试中并没有造成任何问题。
该键提供了平庸的行程和坚实的反馈。很快就能达到明显的启动点,剩下的按键感觉很柔和,可以舒适而快速地打字。按键的咔哒声是适度的。
惠普安装了四区的RGB背光灯。在实践中,有三个大的区域,第四个区域是游戏时经常使用的WASD键。颜色可以通过游戏中心定制。
触摸板
显示屏 - 良好的全高清模式,144赫兹
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 407 cd/m²
Contrast: 1191:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 3.49
ΔE Greyscale 5.88 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
99.47% sRGB (Calman 2D)
99.47% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73.76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.57
HP Omen 16-b0085ng BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | HP Omen 15-en0375ng BOE0852, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Victus 16-e0179ng BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F LG Philips 156QHG, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -44% | 0% | -1% | 18% | -9% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 72.3 | 39.12 -46% | 72.6 0% | 97.8 35% | 65.4 -10% | |
sRGB Coverage | 99.5 | 57.6 -42% | 100 1% | 99 -1% | 99.9 0% | 91.3 -8% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.8 | 40.42 -45% | 73.5 0% | 73 -1% | 66.7 -10% | |
Response Times | -174% | -18% | 23% | -17% | 9% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8 ? | 30.4 ? -280% | 9.6 ? -20% | 9.2 ? -15% | 12 ? -50% | 7.4 ? 7% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12.4 ? | 20.8 ? -68% | 14.4 ? -16% | 4.8 61% | 10.4 ? 16% | 11.2 ? 10% |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | |||||
Screen | -27% | 15% | 22% | 6% | 0% | |
Brightness middle | 405 | 297 -27% | 361 -11% | 551 36% | 409.5 1% | 307 -24% |
Brightness | 378 | 275 -27% | 341 -10% | 523 38% | 390 3% | 321 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 88 1% | 88 1% | 88 1% | 83 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.33 3% | 0.3 12% | 0.54 -59% | 0.47 -38% | 0.27 21% |
Contrast | 1191 | 900 -24% | 1203 1% | 1020 -14% | 871 -27% | 1137 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 4.54 -23% | 2.44 34% | 1.8 51% | 3.48 6% | 4.67 -26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.77 | 18.92 -144% | 6.37 18% | 2.53 67% | 6.31 19% | 7.53 3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.49 | 4.66 -34% | 1.26 64% | 1.66 52% | 0.89 74% | 2.41 31% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.88 | 2.1 64% | 4.6 22% | 1.85 69% | 5 15% | 4.5 23% |
Gamma | 2.57 86% | 2.066 106% | 2.268 97% | 2.3 96% | 2.16 102% | 2.276 97% |
CCT | 6342 102% | 6291 103% | 6609 98% | 6338 103% | 6591 99% | 6824 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 73.76 | 40 -46% | 72.81 -1% | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.47 | 58 -42% | 99.41 0% | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -82% /
-49% | -1% /
7% | 15% /
19% | 2% /
4% | 0% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.6 ms rise | |
↘ 5.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.2 ms rise | |
↘ 3.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19035 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 快速!
Omen 16是一个游戏系统。八核的 英特尔酷睿i7-11800H而且,更重要的是,其 NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070笔记本GPU以及144-Hz显示屏是这方面相当明显的线索。16GB的内存容量也应该是足够的。Omen的设计时尚而微妙,主要是为那些喜欢更悠闲的设计而不是更常见的、俗气的外观的游戏玩家制作的。
在Omen游戏中心,用户可以在几个默认的性能配置文件中进行选择。对于原始性能基准测试,我们选择了性能配置文件 "性能",并将图形切换器设置为专用,以确保专用GPU始终处于启用状态。然后我们切换回混合模式(Optimus)进行电池测试。
我们在Gaming Hub软件上遇到了一个令人沮丧的问题,它在每次启动时都提醒我们正在使用一个旧版本。然而,试图更新会将我们重定向到Windows商店。在这里,软件显示为 "已经安装",没有任何更新的选项。
处理器
奥曼配备了一个 英特尔酷睿i7-11800H八核处理器,理论时钟速度为2.3至4.6GHz。它具有Thunderbolt 4功能,值得注意的是,AMD的竞争平台上仍然没有这个功能。
在我们的Cinebench R15循环中,性能保持非常一致,没有最初的下降。虽然TDP开始时高于95W,但在第二次循环后有所下降,并保持在80W左右的相对稳定。性能与Legion 5 Pro和Alienware x15相似,符合我们的预期。在Cinebench基准测试中,更便宜的Victus要慢15%左右。
在所有的基准测试中,CPU的性能都很快,与Legion 5 Pro相似,Alienware在一些基准测试中稍快。相比之下,Omen在Geekbench和其他一些基准测试中排名第一。
在电池模式下,CPU性能下降了整整40%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Dauertest
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (6508 - 14088, n=47) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=235, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1386 - 1522, n=44) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=238, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (2498 - 5408, n=49) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=238, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (520 - 586, n=46) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=241, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1342 - 2173, n=49) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=242, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (201 - 231, n=45) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (217 - 454, n=45) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=239, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=235, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (33718 - 56758, n=45) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=236, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (5138 - 5716, n=45) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (4655 - 9851, n=39) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 |
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=234, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1429 - 1625, n=39) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=239, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (7.38 - 17.4, n=45) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=235, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (38.6 - 59.9, n=44) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (0.548 - 0.615, n=45) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=235, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=194, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (6126 - 7311, n=11) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12176, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (9248 - 10832, n=11) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=193, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (8571 - 9669, n=11) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7627 - 10851, n=11) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
PCMark 10 Score | 7231 points | |
Help |
DPC延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
说到存储解决方案,我们的测试设备采用了由英特尔Optane内存H10 32GB + 512GB组成的组合解决方案。32GB的Optane缓存只有在重复执行相同的工作负载后才有优势,而且英特尔固态硬盘在其他方面的表现也不尽如人意--一些竞争对手的速度高达两倍以上。
考虑到这一点,出色的系统性能结果有些令人惊讶。也许,超快的Optane内存能够抵消所安装的主固态硬盘的性能劣势。在我们的 硬盘/SSD表中,固态硬盘糟糕的合成测量结果将其排在第262位。
HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | HP Omen 15-en0375ng WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | HP Victus 16-e0179ng WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1 | Average Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 96% | 113% | 57% | 89% | -14% | 13% | |
Write 4K | 104.9 | 119.6 14% | 157.3 50% | 89.9 -14% | 179.6 71% | 138.2 32% | 110.3 ? 5% |
Read 4K | 116.8 | 47.4 -59% | 49 -58% | 30.98 -73% | 49.21 -58% | 31.31 -73% | 131.9 ? 13% |
Write Seq | 587 | 2677 356% | 2983 408% | 2062 251% | 459.3 -22% | 569 ? -3% | |
Read Seq | 1316 | 2220 69% | 2247 71% | 1849 41% | 1283 -3% | 1372 ? 4% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 325.7 | 427.4 31% | 395 21% | 371.6 14% | 462.9 42% | 321 -1% | 387 ? 19% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 445.1 | 549 23% | 557 25% | 470.6 6% | 470.2 6% | 394.5 -11% | 375 ? -16% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 686 | 2706 294% | 3094 351% | 3065 347% | 2702 294% | 436 -36% | 1141 ? 66% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2092 | 2869 37% | 2871 37% | 3370 61% | 3371 61% | 2222 6% | 2439 ? 17% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 1619 | ||||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1670 | ||||||
AS SSD | 377% | 377% | 176% | 249% | 48% | 119% | |
Seq Read | 925 | 2255 144% | 2383 158% | 2695 191% | 2871 210% | 1978 114% | 1056 ? 14% |
Seq Write | 496 | 2129 329% | 2466 397% | 2384 381% | 1511 205% | 308.3 -38% | 429 ? -14% |
4K Read | 19.99 | 49.5 148% | 44.14 121% | 29.75 49% | 44.3 122% | 24.04 20% | 61.9 ? 210% |
4K Write | 17.96 | 175.1 875% | 117.5 554% | 52 190% | 162 802% | 113.7 533% | 105 ? 485% |
4K-64 Read | 276.2 | 1463 430% | 1734 528% | 1193 332% | 1038 276% | 256.5 -7% | 459 ? 66% |
4K-64 Write | 270.2 | 2061 663% | 2088 673% | 1107 310% | 966 258% | 242.8 -10% | 644 ? 138% |
Access Time Read * | 0.23 | 0.138 40% | 0.049 79% | 0.136 41% | 0.077 67% | 0.15 35% | 0.1019 ? 56% |
Access Time Write * | 0.249 | 0.022 91% | 0.032 87% | 0.36 -45% | 0.066 73% | 0.353 -42% | 0.09417 ? 62% |
Score Read | 389 | 1738 347% | 2017 419% | 1493 284% | 1370 252% | 478 23% | 627 ? 61% |
Score Write | 338 | 2449 625% | 2452 625% | 1397 313% | 1279 278% | 387 14% | 792 ? 134% |
Score Total | 910 | 5075 458% | 5503 505% | 3636 300% | 3288 261% | 1033 14% | 1732 ? 90% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 544 | 1007 85% | 1962 261% | 278.1 -49% | 782 ? 44% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 170.4 | 43.11 -75% | 407.9 139% | 282.3 66% | 464 ? 172% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 294.8 | 621 111% | 1105 275% | 284.2 -4% | 722 ? 145% | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 237% /
259% | 245% /
266% | 117% /
140% | 169% /
190% | 17% /
26% | 66% /
80% |
* ... smaller is better
Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
在混合模式下,集成的UHD Graphics 和专用的 NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070笔记本GPU拥有8GB的VRAM,根据负载情况轮流使用。后者的TGP被设定为115瓦。它的可能光谱为80瓦至125瓦,属于高性能类别。另外,也可以选择配备RTX 3060的Omen 16。
Omen 16的3DMark结果不错,与Alienware和Legion 5 Pro的结果非常相似。同时,惠普Victus内部的RTX 3060慢了约30%。
在电池模式下,该系统的图形性能下降了整整64%。
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (12535 - 38275, n=54) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 192520, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (45531 - 179716, n=33) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7178 - 29128, n=52) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=240, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (2644 - 11019, n=53) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
3DMark 11 Performance | 28206 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 54319 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 20835 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10126 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
在我们的游戏基准测试中,Omen 16是一个重量级产品,与Alienware争夺第一名。然而,后者的表现往往比我们的Omen 16略胜一筹,特别是在更高的分辨率和质量设置下。
New World | |
1920x1080 Low Video Quality | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (99.8 - 120.5, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (19.9 - 134.2, n=11, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Medium Video Quality | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (84.6 - 96.8, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (16.4 - 129, n=20, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 High Video Quality | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (81.7 - 94.8, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (15.3 - 122, n=20, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Very High Video Quality | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (79.4 - 86.8, n=4) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average of class Gaming (12.2 - 115, n=20, last 2 years) |
Far Cry 5 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average of class Gaming (9 - 198, n=79, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (108 - 163, n=18) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average of class Gaming (8 - 186, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (100 - 143, n=26) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average of class Gaming (16 - 181, n=135, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (93 - 137, n=26) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average of class Gaming (14 - 167, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (89 - 140, n=36) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
Dota 2 Reborn | |
1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average of class Gaming (23.8 - 210, n=252, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (30.9 - 178, n=58) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average of class Gaming (22 - 194.7, n=251, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (26.9 - 163.9, n=57) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
X-Plane 11.11 | |
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average of class Gaming (13.7 - 188.8, n=248, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (13.7 - 144.7, n=59) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 146.4, n=255, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (12.4 - 118.8, n=59) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (12 - 124.7, n=63, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (49.6 - 98.7, n=12) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) |
在我们60分钟的 Witcher 3闲置测试中,帧率并不完全稳定。在这里,性能略有波动,尽管图中没有显示出性能的长期大幅下降。