Notebookcheck Logo

惠普Omen 16笔记本电脑回顾。强大的RTX 3070游戏笔记本有不必要的缺点

好兆头。

通过惠普Victus，惠普刚刚推出了一款新的预算游戏笔记本电脑。这就引出了一个问题。Omen系列的小价格溢价是否合理？这就是我们将在下面的评论中试图确定的，特别是由于新的Omen 16采用了现在非常流行的16英寸外形尺寸，同时是Omen 15的继任者。
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake

惠普Omen 16是今年新推出的。旧的Omen 15仍然没有看到直接的继承者。相反，惠普为一个15.6英寸的机箱安装了一个16.1英寸的显示屏。因此，现在的边框更小，而且机箱的结构也有小的差别。与去年的机型相比，当然也有CPU (Tiger Lake)和GPU ( RTX 3000 )的升级。

当然，我们将把我们的测试设备与它的前辈，即 HP Omen 15 (Ryzen 4000和RTX 2060)和它的新兄弟姐妹，即 惠普Victus 16（Ryzen 5000和RTX 3060）。.此外，我们还选择了装备类似的 联想Legion 5 Pro 16以及更昂贵的 Alienware x15 R1和 MSI Katana GF66 11UG作为我们比较的设备。

HP Omen 16-b0085ng (Omen 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 95 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 115 W TDP, Geforce 462.80, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, 2 x 8 GB DDR4-3200 MHz RAM, dual channel
Display
16.10 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 137 PPI, BOE09BE, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), 512 GB 
, 480 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset port, Card Reader: SD card reader
Networking
Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23 x 369.2 x 248
Battery
83 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HP Wide Vision 720p HD camera
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.37 kg, Power Supply: 763 g
Price
1799 Euro
Links
HP homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.6 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU		2.4 kg23 mm16.10"1920x1080
82.8 %
v7 (old)
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile		2.2 kg23 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		2.5 kg23.5 mm16.10"1920x1080
87.4 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU		2.6 kg26.85 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.2 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU		2.4 kg15.9 mm15.60"2560x1440
79.2 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU		2.3 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080

底座 - 惠普Omen的小更新

底盘与去年的模型几乎没有什么不同。例如，材料、端口布局或设计变化方面的差异只有在仔细检查后才会发现。

底座现在几乎完全由发黑的金属组成，显示屏框架由硬塑料制成，而边框则由较软的塑料制成，是一块真正的指纹磁铁。虽然金属底座在少量的压力下会略微弯曲，而且显示屏相当容易扭曲，然后导致IPS屏幕上出现严重的出血现象，但它总体上给人一种非常坚实的印象。

虽然盖子可以单手打开，但两个铰链可以更牢固以更好地防止摇晃。

与Omen 15相比，Omen 16的宽度和深度略大。虽然宽度差不多，但惠普Victus的深度要长1厘米左右。然而，其他15英寸的竞争对手并不一定更紧凑。虽然Omen 16和Victus 16比15英寸机型更宽，但Legion 5 Pro和Alienware在深度上都更长。

最后，与Omen 15相比，Omen 16增加了200克，这仍然使它比大多数竞争对手更轻。

Size Comparison

❌
370 mm 260 mm 23.5 mm 2.5 kg369.2 mm 248 mm 23 mm 2.4 kg359 mm 259 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 264.4 mm 26.85 mm 2.6 kg358 mm 240 mm 23 mm 2.2 kg359.7 mm 277.25 mm 15.9 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - Thunderbolt 4，否则只有USB 3.0

尽管右撇子用户会很高兴听到在机箱右侧的最顶端只有两个USB-A接口，但它们之间的空间太小了，甚至只是一个小的滑盖式U盘都无法放在更小的USB鼠标线旁边。

其余的端口位于左侧，间距也非常紧凑，这可能会导致电缆阻碍附近的接口。值得庆幸的是，这种分布方式（如USB-A旁边的miniDP）应该能大部分解决这个问题。前面和后面都没有端口。

带有Thunderbolt 4和type-C外形尺寸的USB 4端口是一个优点。尽管剩下的三个USB-A端口被惠普标记为 "超高速"，但只支持3.0标准。

弹簧式读卡器可以接受全尺寸的SD卡。它们几乎完全消失在机箱内，没有不必要地突出它。

右：2个USB-A 3.0
右：2个USB-A 3.0
左边：AC适配器，LAN，USB-A 3.0（HP睡眠和充电），miniDP，HDMI，USB-C 4与Thunderbolt 4，耳机，SD读卡器
左边：AC适配器，LAN，USB-A 3.0（HP睡眠和充电），miniDP，HDMI，USB-C 4与Thunderbolt 4，耳机，SD读卡器

SD卡阅读器

SD卡阅读器的传输往往低于平均水平。从我们的参考存储卡AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60复制1GB的图片到桌面需要将近18秒。平均来说，我们数据库中的游戏笔记本都配备了明显更快的型号，更昂贵的Alienware显示了在速度方面的可能性。在光谱的另一端，有联想和微星，两者都没有SD卡读卡器。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
  (AV Pro V60)
195.8 MB/s +244%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 197.3, n=66, last 2 years)
90.2 MB/s +59%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75 MB/s +32%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
71 MB/s +25%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
56.9 (56.71min - 56.93max) MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
  (AV Pro V60)
223.8 MB/s +186%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 258, n=65, last 2 years)
113.8 MB/s +45%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s +12%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
78.3 MB/s
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s -2%

沟通

除了1-Gbps的LAN，Omen 16还通过其英特尔AX210模块支持Wi-Fi 6E。后者能够达到千兆的速度，只是与我们的期望相差甚远。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (675 - 1602, n=27)
1166 MBit/s +5%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1115 (720min - 827max) MBit/s
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1083 (758min - 1175max) MBit/s -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
967 (471min - 1048max) MBit/s -13%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
928 (483min - 1003max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AX12
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1469 (1135min - 1535max) MBit/s +40%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (914 - 1716, n=27)
1309 MBit/s +24%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1052 (986min - 1142max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
928 (868min - 988max) MBit/s -12%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
732 (376min - 763max) MBit/s -30%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100Tooltip
HP Omen 16-b0085ng; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1052 (986-1142)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø787 (720-827)

网络摄像头

惠普已经解决了一个720p的网络摄像头。有了惠普宽视角，摄像头可以捕捉到88度的角度，导致很多环境都可以看到，而不是一个人占满屏幕。这对于视频通话来说可能是可取的，也可能是不可取的。

其他方面的质量与市场上的低标准相匹配，图像比较有颗粒感，颜色也很模糊。自动亮度表现得很奇怪，最初对人脸过度曝光，但片刻之后又严厉地调整亮度曲线，这使得背景看起来特别暗。

ColorChecker
20.5 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
16 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
22 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
17 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen 16-b0085ng: 21.06 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 33.29 ∆E

安全问题

Omen 16缺少Kensington锁和指纹传感器。由于采用了CPU，当然支持TPM 2.0。

配件和保修

预先安装的软件
预先安装的软件

包装中没有任何额外的配件。Omen 16默认包括预装的软件试用版，如ExpressVPN（30天免费试用版）、LastPass Premium（30天免费试用版）和微软365的1个月许可证。对此感到恼火的用户将不得不手动安装这些应用程序。

维护

底板是用8个不同尺寸的十字螺丝和各种夹子固定的。尽管有塑料夹子，但底板可以在没有任何工具的情况下被移除--太好了随后，用户可以接触到两个风扇、内存插槽、Wi-Fi模块（部分被热管覆盖）、电池、SSD和一个额外的、未被占用的SSD插槽。

易于维护
易于维护
2个占用的RAM插槽
2个占用的RAM插槽
未被占用的NVMe SSD插槽
未被占用的NVMe SSD插槽

担保金

惠普提供标准的12个月有限硬件保修，以及1年的软件和初始设置有限技术支持。如果需要的话，可以通过现场硬件支持等选项来延长保修期。

输入设备--用户对触摸板，请回复!

键盘

键盘
键盘
集成式电源按钮
集成式电源按钮

与惠普Victus 16不同的是，Omen 16没有配备数字键盘，这意味着有更多的空间给箭头、pos1、结束等键以及右上方的专用打印屏幕键，这对于截图非常方便。键盘布局看起来非常有条理，这可能是可用空间的结果，而且按键符号很容易阅读。有一个特殊的键用于启动Omen Gaming Hub，在那里可以调整性能设置（风扇、性能配置文件）。

电源键在F12和Del键之间的特殊按键行的位置似乎不是最佳的，但在我们的测试中并没有造成任何问题。

该键提供了平庸的行程和坚实的反馈。很快就能达到明显的启动点，剩下的按键感觉很柔和，可以舒适而快速地打字。按键的咔哒声是适度的。

惠普安装了四区的RGB背光灯。在实践中，有三个大的区域，第四个区域是游戏时经常使用的WASD键。颜色可以通过游戏中心定制。

触摸板

触摸板。在我们的案例中是一个 "柠檬"？
触摸板。在我们的案例中是一个 "柠檬"？

我们在触摸板上遇到了几个问题，事实上，这可能是有问题的，在这一点上使评级变得复杂。即使在卸载和重新安装驱动后，仍有各种掉线现象。点击和移动有时根本无法识别。

相比之下，我们对触摸板的尺寸或质地没有任何批评意见，因为即使在慢速情况下，滑行性能也非常好，而且点击会产生适度的声音反馈。

显示屏 - 良好的全高清模式，144赫兹

Omen 16使用与Victus 16相同的16.1英寸、哑光FHD 144-Hz BOE IPS面板。因此，结果是相似的。该显示器的亮度水平达到了近400尼特，照度为87%--这是一个不错的结果。与较早的Omen 15相比，这是一个重大改进。

尽管该面板确实存在一些沿边缘的背光渗漏，但只有在非常暗的环境照明条件下才会变得明显。

非常短的响应时间符合这个级别的预期，而且该显示器没有使用PWM进行亮度调节。

由于哑光覆盖，子像素有颗粒感
由于哑光覆盖，子像素有颗粒感
沿着边缘有轻微的背光渗出
沿着边缘有轻微的背光渗出
370
cd/m²		386
cd/m²		351
cd/m²
373
cd/m²		405
cd/m²		355
cd/m²
383
cd/m²		404
cd/m²		375
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE09BE tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 405 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 378 cd/m² Minimum: 24.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 407 cd/m²
Contrast: 1191:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 3.49
ΔE Greyscale 5.88 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.47% sRGB (Calman 2D)
99.47% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73.76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.57
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"		HP Omen 15-en0375ng
BOE0852, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		HP Victus 16-e0179ng
BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"		Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
LG Philips 156QHG, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"		MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
-44%
0%
-1%
18%
-9%
Display P3 Coverage
72.3
39.12
-46%
72.6
0%
97.8
35%
65.4
-10%
sRGB Coverage
99.5
57.6
-42%
100
1%
99
-1%
99.9
0%
91.3
-8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
73.8
40.42
-45%
73.5
0%
73
-1%
66.7
-10%
Response Times
-174%
-18%
23%
-17%
9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 ?(4.2, 3.8)
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
-280%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
-20%
9.2 ?(3, 6.2)
-15%
12 ?(6, 6)
-50%
7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6)
7%
Response Time Black / White *
12.4 ?(6.6, 5.8)
20.8 ?(11.6, 9.2)
-68%
14.4 ?(8.4, 6)
-16%
4.8
61%
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
16%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
10%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(99)
Screen
-27%
15%
22%
6%
0%
Brightness middle
405
297
-27%
361
-11%
551
36%
409.5
1%
307
-24%
Brightness
378
275
-27%
341
-10%
523
38%
390
3%
321
-15%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
88
1%
88
1%
88
1%
83
-5%
Black Level *
0.34
0.33
3%
0.3
12%
0.54
-59%
0.47
-38%
0.27
21%
Contrast
1191
900
-24%
1203
1%
1020
-14%
871
-27%
1137
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.7
4.54
-23%
2.44
34%
1.8
51%
3.48
6%
4.67
-26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.77
18.92
-144%
6.37
18%
2.53
67%
6.31
19%
7.53
3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.49
4.66
-34%
1.26
64%
1.66
52%
0.89
74%
2.41
31%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.88
2.1
64%
4.6
22%
1.85
69%
5
15%
4.5
23%
Gamma
2.57 86%
2.066 106%
2.268 97%
2.3 96%
2.16 102%
2.276 97%
CCT
6342 102%
6291 103%
6609 98%
6338 103%
6591 99%
6824 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
73.76
40
-46%
72.81
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.47
58
-42%
99.41
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-82% / -49%
-1% / 7%
15% / 19%
2% / 4%
0% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

与同类平均水平相比，对比度和黑值很有竞争力，sRGB色彩空间基本上被完全覆盖。同时，该显示器仍然覆盖了73%的AdobeRGB和DCI-P3色彩空间。

尽管该显示器在出厂时已被很好地校准，但我们还是能够通过对显示器进行手动校准来进一步改善色彩。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检测器
颜色检测器
灰度标定
灰度标定
饱和度校验
饱和度校验
校准的ColorChecker
校准的ColorChecker
与sRGB相比
与sRGB相比
VS AdobeRGB
VS AdobeRGB

哑光覆盖层防止了大部分的眩光和反射，亮度足以满足户外使用。像往常一样，从某个角度看显示器时，反射会变得很麻烦。

阴天的室外
阴天的室外
在户外，以某种角度观看显示器
在户外，以某种角度观看显示器

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.6 ms rise
↘ 5.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.2 ms rise
↘ 3.8 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8471 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

考虑到这是一块IPS显示屏，从极端角度观看时，感知到的亮度水平下降得相当厉害，甚至可能比平时更厉害。然而，在正常情况下，这几乎是不明显的。

性能 - 快速!

Omen 16是一个游戏系统。八核的 英特尔酷睿i7-11800H而且，更重要的是，其 NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070笔记本GPU以及144-Hz显示屏是这方面相当明显的线索。16GB的内存容量也应该是足够的。Omen的设计时尚而微妙，主要是为那些喜欢更悠闲的设计而不是更常见的、俗气的外观的游戏玩家制作的。

在Omen游戏中心，用户可以在几个默认的性能配置文件中进行选择。对于原始性能基准测试，我们选择了性能配置文件 "性能"，并将图形切换器设置为专用，以确保专用GPU始终处于启用状态。然后我们切换回混合模式（Optimus）进行电池测试。

我们在Gaming Hub软件上遇到了一个令人沮丧的问题，它在每次启动时都提醒我们正在使用一个旧版本。然而，试图更新会将我们重定向到Windows商店。在这里，软件显示为 "已经安装"，没有任何更新的选项。

奥门游戏中心希望得到更新
奥门游戏中心希望得到更新
Omen Gaming Hub无法更新
Omen Gaming Hub无法更新
没有看到更新按钮
没有看到更新按钮
 

处理器

奥曼配备了一个 英特尔酷睿i7-11800H八核处理器，理论时钟速度为2.3至4.6GHz。它具有Thunderbolt 4功能，值得注意的是，AMD的竞争平台上仍然没有这个功能。

在我们的Cinebench R15循环中，性能保持非常一致，没有最初的下降。虽然TDP开始时高于95W，但在第二次循环后有所下降，并保持在80W左右的相对稳定。性能与Legion 5 Pro和Alienware x15相似，符合我们的预期。在Cinebench基准测试中，更便宜的Victus要慢15%左右。

Cinebench循环中的TDP
Cinebench循环中的TDP

在所有的基准测试中，CPU的性能都很快，与Legion 5 Pro相似，Alienware在一些基准测试中稍快。相比之下，Omen在Geekbench和其他一些基准测试中排名第一。

在电池模式下，CPU性能下降了整整40%。

Cinebench R15 Multi Dauertest

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2126 (2093.8-2147.31)
HP Victus 16-e0179ng AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1967 (1952.36-1982.46)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2089 (2082.79-2095.01)
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2144 (2104.27-2154.01)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 39652, n=148, last 2 years)
21966 Points +77%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H
14021 (13411min - 14020.7max) Points +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12817 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11938 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
12409 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6508 - 14088, n=48)
11650 Points -6%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
11267 Points -9%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10097 Points -19%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
8447 Points -32%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2252, n=148, last 2 years)
1897 Points +26%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
1517 Points 0%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
1511 Points
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H
1511 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1522, n=45)
1497 Points -1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1407 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1374 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1294 Points -14%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1248 Points -17%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 15517, n=148, last 2 years)
8431 Points +75%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H
5316 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4982 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4611 Points -5%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
4831 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2498 - 5408, n=50)
4459 Points -8%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4380 Points -9%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4172 Points -14%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
3306 Points -32%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 866, n=148, last 2 years)
730 Points +25%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
585 Points
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
583 Points 0%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H
579 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=47)
576 Points -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
529 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
502 Points -14%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
486 Points -17%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (1537 - 6074, n=151, last 2 years)
3393 Points +58%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H
2154 (2104.27min - 2154.01max) Points 0%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
2147 (2093.8min - 2147.31max) Points
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
2121 (1799.78min - 2120.55max) Points -1%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
1342 (1300.31min - 1341.52max) Points -37%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2095 (2082.79min - 2095.01max) Points -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1982 (1952.36min - 1982.46max) Points -8%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1909 (1812.99min - 1909.31max) Points -11%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=50)
1894 Points -12%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 343, n=148, last 2 years)
280 Points +23%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
231 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
209 Points -8%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points 0%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points 0%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H
227 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (201 - 231, n=46)
225 Points -1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
188 Points -18%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
342 Seconds * -51%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 454, n=46)
277 Seconds * -23%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
259 Seconds * -15%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
256 Seconds * -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
255 Seconds * -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
244 Seconds * -8%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
226 Seconds *
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H
220 Seconds * +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (81 - 517, n=142, last 2 years)
170.7 Seconds * +24%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 144064, n=146, last 2 years)
84007 MIPS +53%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56716 MIPS +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56682 MIPS +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56187 MIPS +2%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
54903 MIPS
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H
50988 MIPS -7%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
50075 MIPS -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (33718 - 56758, n=46)
48384 MIPS -12%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
38156 MIPS -31%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7573, n=146, last 2 years)
6274 MIPS +11%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
5674 MIPS
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5575 MIPS -2%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
5567 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5497 MIPS -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5038 MIPS -11%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5732, n=46)
5492 MIPS -3%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H
5449 MIPS -4%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4638 MIPS -18%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 25855, n=145, last 2 years)
14978 Points +62%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
9261 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4655 - 9851, n=40)
8551 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8244 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7993 Points -14%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
8073 Points -13%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7899 Points -15%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
6758 Points -27%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2423, n=145, last 2 years)
1910 Points +20%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
1588 Points
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
1585 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1429 - 1625, n=40)
1561 Points -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1436 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1393 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1347 Points -15%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1203 Points -24%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (7.7 - 42.9, n=146, last 2 years)
23.8 fps +43%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
16.6 fps
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H
16.2 fps -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
16.1 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.7 fps -11%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.1 fps -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (7.38 - 17.4, n=46)
13.8 fps -17%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.9 fps -22%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
11 fps -34%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
99.9 s * -115%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56.9 s * -23%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
69.2 s * -49%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56.4 s * -22%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
49.5 s * -7%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H
49.2 s * -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 96.6, n=144, last 2 years)
47.8 s * -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 59.9, n=45)
46.5 s * -0%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.4 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.575 sec * -3%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.566 sec * -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.615, n=46)
0.566 sec * -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.559 sec * -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.524 sec * +6%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec *
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.548 sec * +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.518 sec * +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=147, last 2 years)
0.4389 sec * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2147 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
254 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
228 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4831 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
585 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1511 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12409 Points
Help

系统性能

PCMark 10
PCMark 10

Omen 16取得了良好的系统性能（PCMark 10）结果，并成功地在总体和基本要素类别中排名第一。

也就是说，这些差异相对较小。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=131, last 2 years)
7883 Points +9%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
7231 Points
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
7217 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (6126 - 7311, n=11)
6912 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6717 Points -7%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
6666 Points -8%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6567 Points -9%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5766 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12600, n=131, last 2 years)
10760 Points 0%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
10735 Points
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
10419 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (9248 - 10832, n=11)
10104 Points -6%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9943 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9548 Points -11%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
9248 Points -14%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
8934 Points -17%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=131, last 2 years)
9888 Points +11%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
9217 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (8571 - 9669, n=11)
9051 Points +1%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
9022 Points +1%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
8935 Points
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8923 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8866 Points -1%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
7386 Points -17%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 19351, n=131, last 2 years)
12652 Points +18%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
10851 Points +1%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
10700 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7627 - 10851, n=11)
9833 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9715 Points -9%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
9431 Points -12%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8660 Points -19%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
7887 Points -26%
PCMark 10 Score
7231 points
Help

DPC延迟

根据LatencyMon，即使只是在Edge浏览器中打开我们的主页，也会导致有问题的DPC延迟。在播放我们的4K60FPS YouTube视频时，至少只有1帧被丢弃。我们希望惠普能够重新审视他们的驱动程序，并发布更新版本。

YouTube测试
YouTube测试
延迟监测
延迟监测
LatencyMon驱动程序
LatencyMon驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
698 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

说到存储解决方案，我们的测试设备采用了由英特尔Optane内存H10 32GB + 512GB组成的组合解决方案。32GB的Optane缓存只有在重复执行相同的工作负载后才有优势，而且英特尔固态硬盘在其他方面的表现也不尽如人意--一些竞争对手的速度高达两倍以上。

考虑到这一点，出色的系统性能结果有些令人惊讶。也许，超快的Optane内存能够抵消所安装的主固态硬盘的性能劣势。在我们的 硬盘/SSD表中，固态硬盘糟糕的合成测量结果将其排在第262位。

AS SSD
AS SSD
AS SSD拷贝
AS SSD拷贝
水晶盘标志
水晶盘标志
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)		HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G		HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00		Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00		Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G		MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1		Average Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
96%
113%
57%
89%
-14%
13%
Write 4K
104.9
119.6
14%
157.3
50%
89.9
-14%
179.6
71%
138.2
32%
110.3 ?(64.8 - 162.7, n=11)
5%
Read 4K
116.8
47.4
-59%
49
-58%
30.98
-73%
49.21
-58%
31.31
-73%
131.9 ?(98 - 190.5, n=11)
13%
Write Seq
587
2677
356%
2983
408%
2062
251%
459.3
-22%
569 ?(450 - 994, n=11)
-3%
Read Seq
1316
2220
69%
2247
71%
1849
41%
1283
-3%
1372 ?(1223 - 1624, n=11)
4%
Write 4K Q32T1
325.7
427.4
31%
395
21%
371.6
14%
462.9
42%
321
-1%
387 ?(237 - 556, n=11)
19%
Read 4K Q32T1
445.1
549
23%
557
25%
470.6
6%
470.2
6%
394.5
-11%
375 ?(287 - 531, n=11)
-16%
Write Seq Q32T1
686
2706
294%
3094
351%
3065
347%
2702
294%
436
-36%
1141 ?(686 - 1320, n=11)
66%
Read Seq Q32T1
2092
2869
37%
2871
37%
3370
61%
3371
61%
2222
6%
2439 ?(2092 - 2738, n=11)
17%
Write 4K Q8T8
1619
Read 4K Q8T8
1670
AS SSD
377%
377%
176%
249%
48%
119%
Seq Read
925
2255
144%
2383
158%
2695
191%
2871
210%
1978
114%
1056 ?(769 - 1337, n=12)
14%
Seq Write
496
2129
329%
2466
397%
2384
381%
1511
205%
308.3
-38%
429 ?(305 - 836, n=12)
-14%
4K Read
19.99
49.5
148%
44.14
121%
29.75
49%
44.3
122%
24.04
20%
61.9 ?(20 - 76, n=12)
210%
4K Write
17.96
175.1
875%
117.5
554%
52
190%
162
802%
113.7
533%
105 ?(18 - 129.7, n=12)
485%
4K-64 Read
276.2
1463
430%
1734
528%
1193
332%
1038
276%
256.5
-7%
459 ?(276 - 789, n=12)
66%
4K-64 Write
270.2
2061
663%
2088
673%
1107
310%
966
258%
242.8
-10%
644 ?(270 - 948, n=12)
138%
Access Time Read *
0.23
0.138
40%
0.049
79%
0.136
41%
0.077
67%
0.15
35%
0.1019 ?(0.065 - 0.23, n=12)
56%
Access Time Write *
0.249
0.022
91%
0.032
87%
0.36
-45%
0.066
73%
0.353
-42%
0.09417 ?(0.044 - 0.249, n=12)
62%
Score Read
389
1738
347%
2017
419%
1493
284%
1370
252%
478
23%
627 ?(389 - 975, n=12)
61%
Score Write
338
2449
625%
2452
625%
1397
313%
1279
278%
387
14%
792 ?(338 - 1117, n=12)
134%
Score Total
910
5075
458%
5503
505%
3636
300%
3288
261%
1033
14%
1732 ?(910 - 2594, n=12)
90%
Copy ISO MB/s
544
1007
85%
1962
261%
278.1
-49%
782 ?(504 - 1173, n=8)
44%
Copy Program MB/s
170.4
43.11
-75%
407.9
139%
282.3
66%
464 ?(170.4 - 769, n=8)
172%
Copy Game MB/s
294.8
621
111%
1105
275%
284.2
-4%
722 ?(295 - 1045, n=8)
145%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
237% / 259%
245% / 266%
117% / 140%
169% / 190%
17% / 26%
66% / 80%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2092 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 686 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 445.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 325.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1316 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 587 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 116.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 104.9 MB/s

Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU性能

在混合模式下，集成的UHD Graphics 和专用的 NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070笔记本GPU拥有8GB的VRAM，根据负载情况轮流使用。后者的TGP被设定为115瓦。它的可能光谱为80瓦至125瓦，属于高性能类别。另外，也可以选择配备RTX 3060的Omen 16。

Omen 16的3DMark结果不错，与Alienware和Legion 5 Pro的结果非常相似。同时，惠普Victus内部的RTX 3060慢了约30%。

在电池模式下，该系统的图形性能下降了整整64%。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (10741 - 72215, n=138, last 2 years)
44149 Points +27%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
36137 Points +4%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
34644 Points
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
34305 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (12535 - 38275, n=54)
32331 Points -7%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
30339 Points -12%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
25142 Points -27%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
20535 Points -41%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
158182 Points
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
151462 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (84648 - 193851, n=65, last 2 years)
149531 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (45531 - 179716, n=33)
121367 Points -23%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
83364 Points -47%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
63804 Points -60%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (2913 - 56116, n=151, last 2 years)
31756 Points +30%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
25471 Points +4%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
24384 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7178 - 29128, n=52)
24302 Points 0%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
18806 Points -23%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
15499 Points -36%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (2295 - 24873, n=147, last 2 years)
13359 Points +33%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10019 Points
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
9849 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (2644 - 11019, n=53)
9300 Points -7%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
8513 Points -15%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7450 Points -26%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
5819 Points -42%
3DMark 11 Performance
28206 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
54319 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20835 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10126 points
Help

游戏性能

在我们的游戏基准测试中，Omen 16是一个重量级产品，与Alienware争夺第一名。然而，后者的表现往往比我们的Omen 16略胜一筹，特别是在更高的分辨率和质量设置下。

The Witcher 3 | New World | Far Cry 5 | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (108.2 - 688, n=67, last 2 years)
456 fps +10%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
416 fps
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
415.4 (378min - 443max) fps 0%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
381.1 (53.1min, 150P0.1, 271P1 - 599.4max) fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (209 - 672, n=31)
360 fps -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
209 fps -50%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (193.1 - 592, n=67, last 2 years)
366 fps +20%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
304.5 fps
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
279.4 (246min - 317max) fps -8%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
263.4 (35.6min, 81.6P0.1, 190.1P1 - 496.7max) fps -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (169.6 - 339, n=31)
261 fps -14%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
198 fps -35%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (40.1 - 424, n=80, last 2 years)
239 fps +30%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
197.7 (181min - 213max) fps +7%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
184.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (122.1 - 207, n=34)
168 fps -9%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
135 (114min) fps -27%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
132 fps -28%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
122.1 (44.1min, 61P0.1, 101.2P1 - 279.5max) fps -34%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
107 fps -42%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 214, n=110, last 2 years)
126.8 fps +29%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
100.2 (95min - 105max) fps +2%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
98.6 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (34.9 - 109, n=52)
91.8 fps -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86.5 fps -12%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
80.9 (70min) fps -18%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
70.9 (60min) fps -28%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
56.4 fps -43%
New World
1920x1080 Low Video Quality
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
120.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (99.8 - 120.5, n=3)
110 fps -9%
1920x1080 Medium Video Quality
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
96.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (84.6 - 96.8, n=4)
93.4 fps -4%
1920x1080 High Video Quality
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
94.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (81.7 - 94.8, n=4)
89.6 fps -5%
1920x1080 Very High Video Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (79.4 - 86.8, n=4)
83.1 fps +2%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
81.8 fps
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (122 - 208, n=33, last 2 years)
159.3 fps +14%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
143 (111min - 182max) fps +2%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
140 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (108 - 163, n=18)
134.8 fps -4%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (38 - 248, n=64, last 2 years)
144 fps +12%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
129 fps
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
125 (96min - 160max) fps -3%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
122 (96min - 143max) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (100 - 143, n=26)
119.7 fps -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
117 (90min - 162max) fps -9%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (35 - 232, n=70, last 2 years)
137.5 fps +12%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
123 fps
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
118 (94min - 152max) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (93 - 137, n=26)
114.2 fps -7%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
113 (87min - 134max) fps -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
112 (84min - 156max) fps -9%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
109 (86min) fps -11%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=72, last 2 years)
128.8 fps +12%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
115 fps
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
113 (84min - 144max) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (89 - 140, n=36)
108.6 fps -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
107 (77min - 139max) fps -7%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
107 (82min - 127max) fps -7%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
102 (80min) fps -11%
GTA V
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
183 (2.13min, 143P1 - 323max) fps
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
182 (2.19min, 125P1 - 408max) fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (104.2 - 187.9, n=71, last 2 years)
181.1 fps -1%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
181 (3.15min, 143P1 - 457max) fps -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
179 (4.89min, 143P1 - 297max) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (98 - 186, n=36)
175 fps -4%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
163 (4.88min, 100P1 - 245max) fps -11%
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
178 (3.02min, 143P1 - 398max) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (101.7 - 187.7, n=81, last 2 years)
177.5 fps 0%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
175 (3.6min, 125P1 - 251max) fps -2%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
174 (3.92min, 111P1 - 401max) fps -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
173 (4.77min, 111P1 - 237max) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (94.3 - 186.2, n=38)
169.2 fps -5%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
155 (4.13min, 100P1 - 253max) fps -13%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
172 (3.01min, 111P1 - 311max) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (24.2 - 187.1, n=106, last 2 years)
168.2 fps -2%
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
166 (7.04min, 111P1 - 328max) fps -3%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
164 (3.97min, 111P1 - 299max) fps -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
155 (5.89min, 100P1 - 291max) fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (58.2 - 181.4, n=38)
153.2 fps -11%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
150 (4.08min, 100P1 - 270max) fps -13%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
127 (42min, 83.3P1 - 188max) fps -26%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 168.2, n=125, last 2 years)
114.5 fps +11%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
103 (6.42min, 71.4P1 - 201max) fps
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
95.8 (5.97min, 62.5P1 - 194max) fps -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
95.4 (6.67min, 71.4P1 - 183max) fps -7%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
93.5 (9.58min, 62.5P1 - 166max) fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (21.7 - 125.8, n=50)
91 fps -12%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
86.6 (41.1min, 66.7P1 - 161max) fps -16%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
70.8 (19.9min, 45.5P1 - 127max) fps -31%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Gaming
  (69.3 - 244, n=142, last 2 years)
160.9 fps +11%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
145 (127.4min) fps
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
143 (120.5min) fps -1%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
133 (116.8min) fps -8%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
131 (115.4min) fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (30.9 - 178, n=59)
128.8 fps -11%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
128 (113.2min) fps -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
121 (107.1min) fps -17%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
109 (94.5min) fps -25%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=143, last 2 years)
149.8 fps +9%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
137 (118.7min) fps
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
130 (112min) fps -5%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
122 (105.7min) fps -11%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
121 (105.8min) fps -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (26.9 - 163.9, n=58)
120.7 fps -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
117 (100min) fps -15%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
104 (91.8min) fps -24%
X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 193.1, n=144, last 2 years)
132.9 fps +10%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
121 fps
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
114 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (13.7 - 144.7, n=61)
99.9 fps -17%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
98.9 fps -18%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
98.9 fps -18%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
87.2 fps -28%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
84.9 fps -30%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
84.9 fps -30%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
81.9 fps -32%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (33.4 - 166.2, n=147, last 2 years)
104.4 fps +8%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
96.7 fps
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
89.9 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (12.4 - 118.8, n=61)
81.1 fps -16%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
79.7 fps -18%
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
79.7 fps -18%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72.8 fps -25%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
69.9 fps -28%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
69.1 fps -29%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
68.8 fps -29%
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (64.3 - 145.5, n=47, last 2 years)
101 fps
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
80.2 fps
MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
80.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (49.6 - 98.7, n=13)
69.7 fps
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
66 fps

在我们60分钟的 Witcher 3闲置测试中，帧率并不完全稳定。在这里，性能略有波动，尽管图中没有显示出性能的长期大幅下降。

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagramm

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
HP Omen 16-b0085ng i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø81.8 (77-97)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 185 181 172 103
The Witcher 3 (2015) 416 304.5 184.4 98.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 171 151 145 137
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 136 121 96.7
Far Cry 5 (2018) 156 129 123 115
Strange Brigade (2018) 482 254 205 178
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 159 140 135 126
New World (2021) 128 96.8 94.8 81.8

排放--不能忽视的强烈预兆

系统噪音

在混合模式下，风扇在系统空闲时往往不会打开。从Gaming Hub软件中选择性能模式后，风扇大多--但不总是--安静地旋转。在负载情况下，两个风扇变得非常响亮，噪音水平超过竞争对手。然而，从主观上讲，这台笔记本电脑并没有明显地比其竞争对手的声音大。

也就是说，有一些零星的线圈啸叫。这似乎与高负荷的情况有关，如在高分辨率和质量设置下发射 Witcher 3高分辨率和质量设置下的发射。值得庆幸的是，这些相对安静的电子噪音是暂时的，只是有时会被注意到。

Noise Level

Idle
23 / 23 / 34.81 dB(A)
Load
35.02 / 56 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)		HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G		HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00		Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00		Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G		MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
Noise
-5%
-4%
4%
1%
-18%
off / environment *
23
24
-4%
24
-4%
23
-0%
24.1
-5%
25
-9%
Idle Minimum *
23
24
-4%
24
-4%
25
-9%
26.6
-16%
34
-48%
Idle Average *
23
25
-9%
25
-9%
25
-9%
26.6
-16%
35
-52%
Idle Maximum *
34.81
37
-6%
34
2%
25
28%
26.6
24%
36
-3%
Load Average *
35.02
45
-28%
44
-26%
35.5
-1%
30.9
12%
48
-37%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52
48
8%
50
4%
46.67
10%
49.9
4%
46
12%
Load Maximum *
56
51
9%
52
7%
50.35
10%
53.5
4%
49
12%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.528.328.52529.329.629.33136.43536.44034.830.434.85032.83232.86325.730.925.78020.140.420.110022.848.922.812517.132.117.116014.434.214.420016.33816.325019.541.319.531514.343.314.340015.445.515.450013.645.813.663010.845.910.880010.34910.310008.851.28.8125010.353.510.3160010.254.510.2200010.452.310.4250011.553.711.5315011.453.411.4400011.75211.7500011.649.311.6630011.846.711.8800012.243.612.2100001240.8121250011.738.911.71600011.335.611.3SPL23.963.323.9N0.516.60.5median 11.7median 45.9median 11.7Delta2.26.22.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen 16-b0085ng

温度

Omen 16主要在底部发热，那里有大量的栅栏作为进气口和散热口。

在顶部，Omen仍然相对凉爽。底部的热点高达55摄氏度，相对而言，这是很温和的。在这里，高度动态的冷却解决方案在全负荷下的高噪音水平展示了它的能力。尽管配备了更加宽敞的冷却解决方案，Alienware达到了更高的温度，同时只实现了略微更快的性能。

掌托保持舒适的温度，甚至WASD键的温度也出奇的低。在这方面，惠普已经成功地平衡了热量分布，应该让玩家感到满意。

Max. Load
 42 °C43 °C40 °C 
 39 °C42 °C48 °C 
 31 °C32 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
49 °C55 °C48 °C
42 °C54 °C39 °C
32 °C44 °C32 °C
Maximum: 55 °C
Average: 43.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  57 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)		HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G		HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00		Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00		Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G		MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
Heat
14%
-11%
-1%
3%
3%
Maximum Upper Side *
48
42
12%
51
-6%
50
-4%
59.2
-23%
56
-17%
Maximum Bottom *
55
54
2%
52
5%
55
-0%
58
-5%
49
11%
Idle Upper Side *
33
28
15%
46
-39%
34
-3%
28.4
14%
36
-9%
Idle Bottom *
39
29
26%
41
-5%
37
5%
29
26%
28
28%

* ... smaller is better

CPU以大约4.2GHz的速度开始我们的压力测试。不到一分钟后，时钟速度下降到3.5GHz。在压力测试的剩余时间里，尽管温度不断波动，但这一性能水平一直保持着。它们的平均温度为84摄氏度，短期内暂时达到100摄氏度，可能导致时钟速度略微下降，（更有可能）冷却解决方案上升。

相比之下，在整个压力测试期间，GPU循环严重，记录的时钟速度从690到1425 MHz不等，甚至在一个小时后也是如此。显然，当达到75摄氏度时，GPU的温度会暂时节流。

1分钟后的压力测试
1分钟后的压力测试
1小时后的压力测试
1小时后的压力测试
1小时Witcher 3 顶部
1小时Witcher 3 顶部
1hWitcher 3 底部
1hWitcher 3 底部
1hWitcher 3 交流适配器
1hWitcher 3 交流适配器

发言人

立体声扬声器可以变得相当响亮，并提供平衡的中音和高音。当然，它们在低音方面有所欠缺。笔记本电脑上唯一的模拟输出是一个组合式耳机插孔。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.141.434.12533.735.933.73137.53737.54034.334.534.35036.435.836.46332.428.332.48025.223.625.210028.926.628.912537.92137.916052.617.152.620064.117.964.125068.415.368.43157314.17340073.111.773.150072.712.472.763076.511.176.580073.511.973.5100073.710.873.7125076.111.376.1160073.511.573.5200072.711.872.7250070.812.170.8315070.513.770.5400071.615.271.6500069.813.669.8630065.413.665.4800068.213.668.21000071.219.271.21250066.71666.71600060.416.860.4SPL84.425.884.4N65.70.765.7median 70.8median 13.6median 70.8Delta5.72.95.732.935.232.926.922.326.921.620.121.629.725.229.733.233.733.23733.7372822.42820.224.620.218.639.718.617.750.617.722.25822.216.758.516.713.263.513.214.165.414.111.270.611.210.873.710.810.866.810.810.660.610.611.36011.31156.31110.65510.611.259.211.211.464.611.411.565.311.511.752.911.711.85411.811.751.211.711.752.611.711.456.311.41151.31124.176.124.10.636.90.6median 11.5median 58median 11.525.92hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 16-b0085ngLenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理--良好的电池寿命

能源消耗

在空闲状态下，装备相似的竞争对手显示出类似的消耗值，Alienware的耗电量略大，而联想Legion Pro的耗电量略小。在玩Witcher 3 ，Omen的功耗较低，在压力测试期间，与竞争对手相比，功耗略高。消耗值总体上符合我们的预期。

Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 12 / 18 / 21 Watt
Load midlight 94 / 199 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"		HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"		Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"		Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"		MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
22%
16%
2%
-26%
12%
-22%
-16%
Idle Minimum *
12
4
67%
5
58%
10.45
13%
15.7
-31%
8
33%
15.6 ?(4 - 64, n=39)
-30%
13.7 ?(2 - 39, n=122, last 2 years)
-14%
Idle Average *
18
9
50%
10
44%
14.92
17%
20.3
-13%
12
33%
20.1 ?(9 - 68.2, n=39)
-12%
19.3 ?(8 - 55.6, n=122, last 2 years)
-7%
Idle Maximum *
21
22
-5%
20
5%
16.02
24%
43
-105%
22
-5%
29.4 ?(14.6 - 76, n=39)
-40%
26.9 ?(9 - 101.1, n=122, last 2 years)
-28%
Load Average *
94
102
-9%
108
-15%
119.65
-27%
94.4
-0%
98
-4%
110.8 ?(76.8 - 214, n=39)
-18%
102.8 ?(32.1 - 201, n=120, last 2 years)
-9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
147
119
19%
145
1%
174.9
-19%
167
-14%
152
-3%
Load Maximum *
199
182
9%
189
5%
187.26
6%
183.4
8%
162
19%
214 ?(157 - 290, n=39)
-8%
247 ?(64.5 - 431, n=122, last 2 years)
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Energy Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
HP Omen 16-b0085ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø147.3 (143.82-161.2)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø198.8 (156.87-216.39)

电池寿命

惠普安装了一个83瓦时的电池。为了进行电池测试，我们切换到混合模式，启用了Optimus。尽管在某些情况下配备了稍大的电池，但无论是Alienware，还是Legion ，还是微星Katana，都不如我们的Omen持续时间长。Victus配备了较小的70瓦时电池，尽管其硬件较弱，但电池寿命明显缩短。

我们的测试设备允许在降低亮度的情况下进行约7.5小时的Wi-Fi浏览，在5.5小时内，电影之夜也不是问题。对于一个游戏设备来说，电池运行时间是不错的，几乎与同级别的平均水平相匹配，正如直接竞争对手所显示的那样，这个价格类别的笔记本电脑通常不符合这些要求。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
7h 37min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
4h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 25min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 25min
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh		HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 70.9 Wh		HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh		Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh		Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 87 Wh		MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
32%
-17%
-28%
-29%
-25%
9%
H.264
325
462 ?(129 - 884, n=55, last 2 years)
42%
WiFi v1.3
457
628
37%
354
-23%
420
-8%
366
-20%
317
-31%
389 ?(85 - 889, n=121, last 2 years)
-15%
Load
85
108
27%
76
-11%
44
-48%
53
-38%
70
-18%
84.3 ?(41 - 164, n=82, last 2 years)
-1%
Reader / Idle
1200
511
548
582
547
590 ?(239 - 1290, n=48, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 金属底座，精巧设计
+ 带有雷电4的USB4
+ 易于维护
+ 得体的144-Hz FHD显示屏
+ 快速的CPU/GPU和系统性能
+ 平衡的热量分布，凉爽的WASD键
+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 预装臃肿的软件/试用版本
- 只有3个USB 3.0（但1个USB 4）。
- 触摸板输入时出现中断
- 简单地启动浏览器会导致DPC延迟增加
- 轻微的、暂时的电子噪音
- 比竞争对手的噪音略大

结论 - 表现强劲，但有小错误

惠普Omen 16-b0085ng，由惠普提供
惠普Omen 16-b0085ng，由惠普提供

事实证明，Omen 16是一款相当不错的中端游戏笔记本电脑，与Omen 15相比有全面的改进。所有使用情况下的整体性能水平高，电池寿命长，以及良好的FHD显示屏，构成了这款惠普笔记本电脑的主要优势。主要缺点是有问题的触摸板（其中之一）和高延迟，甚至在刚打开浏览器时就可以观察到。此外，无用的、预装的各种软件的30天试用版也属于 "不必要 "的范畴。

Omen 16总体上是一款不错的游戏笔记本电脑，并达到了非常高的性能水平。然而，当涉及到驱动程序和触摸板时，仍有工作要做。

与惠普自己的更便宜的Victus 16相比，Omen 16的价格溢价可能是合理的，因为它的金属底座，更好的连接（USB 4与Thunderbolt 4），大约30%的GPU性能，更好的键盘布局（尽管没有小键盘），尽管有更强大的硬件，但稍微更轻的结构。同时，两款机型都拥有良好的显示屏和类似的CPU性能。

价格和可用性

与我们的配置类似的惠普Omen 16，配备RTX 3070，在BestBuy网站。价格约为1800美元，预计在未来几周内上市。

HP Omen 16-b0085ng - 10/06/2021 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
63%
Connectivity
66 / 80 → 83%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 90%
Battery
70 / 95 → 73%
Display
85%
Games Performance
100%
Application Performance
93%
Temperature
82 / 95 → 87%
Noise
77 / 90 → 85%
Audio
83%
Camera
38 / 85 → 45%
Average
76%
87%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普Omen 16笔记本电脑回顾。强大的RTX 3070游戏笔记本有不必要的缺点
Christian Hintze, 2021-10- 8 (Update: 2021-10- 8)