Notebookcheck Logo
vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

一款拥有顶级硬件和 XXL 电池的小巧Android 智能手机 - vivo X200 FE 评测

Galaxy S25 FE 的激烈竞争。

vivo X200 FE 是一款方便轻巧的手机，为摄影爱好者提供了包括蔡司镜头在内的顶级功能。不过，在一些欧洲国家，这款小型高端手机的 XXL 电池容量明显较小。尽管如此，从纸面上看，这款 vivo 智能手机还是优于Galaxy S25 FE。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Touchscreen Smartphone

结论 - vivo X200 FE

一款小巧轻便的智能手机，边框纤薄，电池续航能力出色，价格合理。在我们的测试中，vivo X200 FE 聚集了许多卖点，尤其是与Galaxy S25 FE 相比。我们也非常喜欢蔡司主摄像头。

我们很难理解不同欧盟国家在存储和电池方面存在的显著配置差异。缓慢的 USB 2.0 端口和严重的节流现象也给整体效果蒙上了阴影。

如果你不怕进口，那就一定要看看我们对 X200 Pro Mini 的评测，它目前的价格还要便宜不少。

Pros

+ 电池寿命长
+ 优质防水外壳
+ 快速充电
+ 出色的主摄像头
+ 轻便小巧
+ 明亮的 LTPO 面板

Cons

- 高节流
- 平均超广角摄像头
- 欧盟内部电池差异
- 仅 USB 2.0

价格和供货情况 - vivo X200 FE

vivo X200 FE 的上市价格为 699 英镑（建议零售价），但目前还无法在亚马逊上购买。

vivo 将推出一款小巧的高端机型，以扩展 X200 系列。与 X200 Pro Mini和 X200 Pro相比，新款 X200 FE 只能使用较老的 联发科 Dimensity 9300+.在 6.31 英寸的 FE 版本中，vivo 还减少了蔡司相机系统，不过 "全体验 "的名字还是保留了下来。与 Galaxy S24 FE相比，数据表中承诺的妥协并不多。

规格 - Vivo X200 FE

Vivo X200 FE (X200 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ 8 x 2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720
Graphics adapter
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.31 inch 19.54:9, 2640 x 1216 pixel 461 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 455 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G: 850/900/1.800/1.900 MHz; 3G: B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19; 4G: FDD-LTE B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66/B71 | 4G TD-LTE B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48; 5G: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n18/n20/n25/n26/n28/n34/n38/n39/n40/n41/n48/n66/n71/n75/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.99 x 150.83 x 71.76
Battery
6500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, 23 mm) + 50 MPix (3x optical zoom, f/2.7, 70 mm) + 8 MPix (f/2.0), camera2 API, Level 3
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.0, 20 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, case, info material, Funtouch OS 15, 36 Months Warranty, Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX TWS+, aptX Adaptive, LC3, LDAC, Opus | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), SBAS | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | Z-axis vibration motor, fanless, waterproof
Weight
186 g
Price
799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 -Android 手机采用玻璃材质

Vivo X200 FE 有多种颜色可供选择，但只有蓝色版本在德国有售。
Vivo X200 FE 有多种颜色可供选择，但只有蓝色版本在德国有售。

vivo X200 FE 做工精良、坚固耐用的外壳给人留下了深刻印象。它通过了 IP68 和 IP69 标准认证，完全防水防尘。机身后部采用喷砂玻璃，不仅看起来质量上乘，还能在很大程度上防止指纹沾染。vivo 采用耐用的 Schott Xensation 玻璃来保护正面。

6.31 英寸显示屏的有效显示面积比超过 90%，充分利用了可用空间。尽管电池容量大大增加，但 X200 FE 的机身厚度仅为 8 毫米，重量为 186 克。这比 Apple iPhone 16 Pro.

尺寸比较

❌
152.8 mm 72 mm 8.5 mm 198 g152.3 mm 71.2 mm 8.08 mm 191 g150.8 mm 71.8 mm 8.2 mm 187 g150.83 mm 71.76 mm 7.99 mm 186 g146.9 mm 70.5 mm 7.2 mm 162 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 仅配备 USB 2.0 的小巧智能手机

vivo X200 FE 配备了 USB OTG 和蓝牙 5.4，这款高端智能手机还配备了用于非接触式支付的 NFC 芯片。根据地区不同，有两种存储空间可供选择：在奥地利和德国，FE 机型配备 12GB LPDDR5X 内存和 256GB 内部 UFS 存储空间，而在西班牙、波兰和意大利，vivo 为其高端手机配备了 512GB 存储空间。

遗憾的是，X200 FE 仅使用 USB 2.0。在拷贝测试中，其传输速度为 33 MB/s，并不算特别快。支持 exFAT 和 NTFS 格式的外部存储设备。

软件 - 顶级手机，Android 15

与中国不同的是，X200 FE 在欧洲没有配备 OriginOS，而是配备了基于Android 15 的 Funtouch OS 15。这款全球机型的软件似乎有点过时，不如 X200 Ultra.在测试过程中，从2025年8月开始提供补丁。

vivo 保证提供四个主要Android 更新和五年的安全补丁。X200 FE 还在欧洲产品能源标签数据库（EPREL）中列出了五年质保。

vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测
vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测
vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测

可持续性

X200 FE 的包装不使用塑料。除此之外，没有关于碳足迹或所用材料的信息。EPREL 数据库指数以 C 级确认了 vivo 手机的可靠可维修性。该公司提供的https://vivospareparts.com/理论上）可确保七年内更换部件。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7 的 vivo X200 FE

X200 FE 使用快速 WiFi 7，包括 6 GHz 频段。这意味着使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器的传输速度非常快，而且基本稳定。不过，在测试开始时，vivo 手机需要一些时间才能达到其全部带宽。

内置蜂窝调制解调器为 LTE 和 5G 连接提供了广泛的频率范围。

Networking
Vivo X200 FE
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
880 (min: 537) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
877 (min: 552) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1686 (min: 837) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1820 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼98%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
748 (min: 603) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1698 (min: 1563) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1058 (min: 518) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1167 (min: 1006) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1210 (min: 998) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1201 (min: 1184) MBit/s ∼65%
Google Pixel 9
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 739) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 857) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1855 (min: 1826) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1851 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 15
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
876 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
871 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1386 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1793 (min: 1671) MBit/s ∼97%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
951 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1112 (min: 755) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1233 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1445 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼78%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
728 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
740 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1353 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1396 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼75%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Vivo X200 FE 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (837-1911)
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1365 (628-1900)
Vivo X200 FE 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1786 (928-1882)
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1791 (1671-1841)
Vivo X200 FE 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø879 (537-977)
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø861 (445-968)
Vivo X200 FE 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (552-950)
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø869 (785-951)
室内地点
室内地点
室外地点
室外地点

在室外，vivo 手机很快就能找到卫星信号，并将其位置精确到 1 米以内。全球主要卫星网络（最好是双频）都可用于定位跟踪。

在我们的日常测试中，X200 FE 表现出色，虽然这款高端手机并不总是能准确绘制出路线，但总的来说，它完全可以胜任导航任务。

Vivo X200 FE 对 Garmin Venu 2
Vivo X200 FE 对 Garmin Venu 2

电话功能和语音质量 -Android 双 SIM 卡智能手机

vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测
vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测

语音传输自然，背景噪声被明显过滤。支持 Wi-Fi 通话和 VoLTE，以及使用两张 nanoSIM 卡的双卡双待功能。系统还可集成 eSIM 卡。

相机 - 配备蔡司镜头的小型手机

使用 5000 万像素前置摄像头自拍
使用 5000 万像素前置摄像头自拍

更便宜的 FE 机型无法与 X200 Pro Mini 的照片质量。不过，我们非常喜欢基于索尼 IMX921 的 5000 万像素蔡司镜头。X200 FE 具有良好的锐度和动态范围。主相机的色彩还原也非常好。在可控的照明条件下，我们几乎没有发现与实际参考色彩相比有任何明显的偏差。由于采用了相对较小的 1/1.56 英寸传感器，低光条件并不是 vivo 手机的强项，不过在低光条件下模糊现象也很有限。

蔡司相机系统由一个长焦相机和一个 800 万像素的超广角镜头组成，长焦相机的分辨率也达到了 5000 万像素。这两个镜头都没有使用 OIS。虽然对于一款紧凑型手机来说，5 倍以内的变焦照片确实不错，但在广角拍摄时就会大打折扣。即使是计划在奥地利和德国推出的版本，长焦镜头也可能使用 OIS。不过，vivo 还没有提供这方面的具体细节。在一些国家（如印度），OIS 至少用于变焦镜头。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
10x
10x
100倍（最大值）
100倍（最大值）
vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测
vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测
vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测
vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测
vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测
vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow lightZoom 5xUltra-wide angle
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
6.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
1 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X200 FE: 4.55 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 8.36 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.3 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
20 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X200 FE: 19.18 ∆E min: 9.25 - max: 30.12 ∆E

配件和保修 - vivo X200 FE 不含充电器

vivo X200 FE 手机壳
vivo X200 FE 手机壳

包装中不包括配套的 90 瓦快速充电电源适配器，只有一个设备颜色的保护套、一条数据/充电线（USB-A 转 USB-C）、一个 SIM 卡针和一份快速入门指南。显示屏上还贴有屏幕保护膜。

制造商提供三年 保修保修。

输入设备和操作 - vivo 手机在显示屏中安装了指纹传感器

由于设计小巧，按键很容易触及。6.31 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏的输入处理无任何延迟，由于刷新率高达 120 Hz，显示效果非常流畅。来自振动电机的触觉反馈非常精确，传递出优质的感觉。

在生物识别方面，内置的光学指纹传感器可以可靠地解锁 vivo 手机。此外，还可使用基于前置摄像头的 FaceUnlock 功能进行不安全的 2D 面部识别。

vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测
vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测
vivo X200 FE 智能手机评测

显示屏 - 这款小巧的手机使用 OLED

子像素排列
子像素排列

vivo 采用 120 Hz LTPO OLED 面板，像素密度高达 461 PPI。制造商声称其亮度高达 5000 尼特。幸运的是，我们可以证实这一点。在 HDR 视频中，我们甚至超过了这一极高亮度，达到了 5,095 cd/m²。但在 APL18 模式中，X200 FE 也表现出色，亮度达到 1,885 cd/m²。

Vivo 使用 OLED 典型的 PWM 来控制亮度，我们测得的频率非常高，超过 2,100 Hz。

1813
cd/m²		1808
cd/m²		1796
cd/m²
1812
cd/m²		1797
cd/m²		1799
cd/m²
1797
cd/m²		1797
cd/m²		1802
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1813 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1802.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.41 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1797 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6668 K
Vivo X200 FE
AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"		Vivo X200 Pro Mini
AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"		Samsung Galaxy S25
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.2"		Google Pixel 9
OLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"		Xiaomi 15
OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"
Screen
9%
-74%
8%
-35%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1797
1764
-2%
1301
-28%
2063
15%
1021
-43%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1802
1817
1%
1311
-27%
1914
6%
1018
-44%
Brightness Distribution (%)
99
95
-4%
98
-1%
84
-15%
98
-1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
0.84
16%
3.1
-210%
0.7
30%
1.3
-30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.9
1.53
19%
4.4
-132%
2.2
-16%
2.9
-53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.2
25%
2.3
-44%
1.2
25%
2.2
-38%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.239 98%
2.01 109%
2.23 99%
2.25 98%
CCT
6668 97%
6646 98%
6454 101%
6524 100%
6658 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 360 Hz
Amplitude: 16.22 %
Secondary Frequency: 2127 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8249 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

使用固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这是由于缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

我们使用光度计和 Calman 软件进行的分析表明，X200 FE 在 sRGB 色彩空间中的平均 DeltaE 偏差非常低。除了三种色彩配置文件外，还可以在设置菜单中自定义白平衡。

色彩准确度（配置文件：专业标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（配置文件：专业标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：专业标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：专业标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：专业标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：专业标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：专业标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：专业标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7575 ms rise
↘ 0.5955 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7815 ms rise
↘ 0.7275 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms).

在户外，这款高端手机凭借其充足的亮度储备给人留下了极好的印象。即使从广角观看，可视角度也保持稳定。

性能 - 小巧的智能手机，强大的芯片组

使用 Dimensity 9300+X200 FE 配备了快速旗舰处理器。不过，与 X200 Mini Pro 不同的是，它是去年的机型之一。尽管如此，这款 vivo 手机仍然在基准测试中取得了高分，其中联发科芯片组在人工智能测试中表现尤为突出。

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3087 Points +38%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3001 Points +34%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2589 Points +16%
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2234 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (2167 - 2234, n=4)
2195 Points -2%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1798 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=206, last 2 years)
1664 Points -26%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
9776 Points +36%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9202 Points +28%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
8078 Points +12%
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7198 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (6972 - 7327, n=4)
7148 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=206, last 2 years)
4847 Points -33%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4501 Points -37%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2677100 Points +91%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2429503 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1975467 Points +41%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (1404873 - 2088406, n=4)
1813271 Points +29%
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1404873 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=148, last 2 years)
1378870 Points -2%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1022007 Points -27%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20623 Points +43%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19192 Points +33%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
16216 Points +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (14377 - 16743, n=4)
15964 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=188, last 2 years)
14435 Points 0%
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
14377 Points
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
13948 Points -3%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
11876 Points +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (9343 - 11976, n=4)
11162 Points +19%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11031 Points +18%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
10948 Points +17%
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
9343 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=147, last 2 years)
7311 Points -22%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
6894 Points -26%
System
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17132 Points +46%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16439 Points +40%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (11754 - 16435, n=4)
14823 Points +26%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
14303 Points +22%
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11754 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=147, last 2 years)
11020 Points -6%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
7593 Points -35%
Memory
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16961 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
14759 Points +58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (9344 - 11254, n=4)
10308 Points +10%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9463 Points +1%
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
9344 Points
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
8573 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20652, n=147, last 2 years)
8283 Points -11%
Graphics
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
52738 Points +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (38843 - 58323, n=4)
52591 Points +35%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
44189 Points +14%
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
38843 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
33965 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=147, last 2 years)
24137 Points -38%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
20938 Points -46%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2275 Points +30%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2009 Points +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (1756 - 2051, n=4)
1946 Points +11%
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1756 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=147, last 2 years)
1660 Points -5%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1648 Points -6%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1202 Points -32%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
78695 Points +22%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (55033 - 74821, n=4)
67237 Points +4%
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
64658 Points
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
35227 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
21837 Points -66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=139, last 2 years)
19972 Points -69%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
18154 Points -72%
AImark - Score v3.x
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
52274 Points +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (43121 - 55794, n=4)
50822 Points +3%
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
49425 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=129, last 2 years)
26772 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1893 Points -96%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1790 Points -96%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
871 Points -98%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.4
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1176 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (n=1)
1176 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 1176, n=26, last 2 years)
523 Points -56%
Half Precision NPU 1.4
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
5178 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (n=1)
5178 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (178 - 5178, n=26, last 2 years)
1090 Points -79%
Quantized NPU 1.4
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
4983 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
  (n=1)
4983 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 4983, n=26, last 2 years)
1758 Points -65%

在图形处理器方面，X200 Pro Mini 与 Immortalis-G925 MP12、和安装了 Immortalis G720 MP12之间的性能差异高于 CPU 基准测试。不过，在 GFXBench 4K 测试中测得的 36fps 已不仅仅适用于游戏。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6932 Points +98%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6076 Points +73%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5845 Points +67%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3503 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2601 Points -26%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6854 Points +98%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5995 Points +73%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5923 Points +71%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3465 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points -26%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27327 Points +122%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24960 Points +103%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22342 Points +81%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12322 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8998 Points -27%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11765 Points +96%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10764 Points +79%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10278 Points +71%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5998 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11687 Points +96%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11649 Points +95%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10432 Points +75%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5976 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2298 Points +72%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2258 Points +69%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1339 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1023 Points -24%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2365 Points +79%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2362 Points +79%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1323 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1083 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
718 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
711 fps +5%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
676 fps
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
628 fps -7%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
419 fps -38%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps +46%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps +31%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
423 fps +23%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
345 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257 fps -26%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
311 fps
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
308 fps -1%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
307 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
268 fps -14%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps -46%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +10%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +10%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -31%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
211 fps +50%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
192 fps +36%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps +11%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +36%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +31%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +24%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps +69%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps +43%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -1%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps -17%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
279 fps +58%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
274 fps +55%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
258 fps +46%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
177 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -39%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +44%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps +31%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps +28%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -47%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
235.734 Points
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
191.986 Points
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
167.122 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=153, last 2 years)
149.7 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (77.7 - 184, n=3)
146.4 Points
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
107.467 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
435 runs/min
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
342 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (138 - 264, n=3)
219 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=136, last 2 years)
196.5 runs/min
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
185 runs/min
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
29.9 runs/min
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
23.5 runs/min
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
15 runs/min
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
14.9 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=112, last 2 years)
13.2 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (6.55 - 15.2, n=3)
12.2 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
244 Points +29%
Vivo X200 FE
189 Points
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
176 Points -7%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
168 Points -11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (78 - 193, n=4)
162.5 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=145, last 2 years)
137 Points -28%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
103 Points -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
95809 Points +95%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
78653 Points +60%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
56843 Points +15%
Google Pixel 9
56737 Points +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (25646 - 71054, n=4)
53467 Points +9%
Vivo X200 FE
49231 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=201, last 2 years)
46379 Points -6%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=156, last 2 years)
1229 ms * -108%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ (592 - 2124, n=4)
997 ms * -69%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
744.57 ms * -26%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini (Chrome 133)
660.34 ms * -12%
Vivo X200 FE
591.54 ms *
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
454.4 ms * +23%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)
389.3 ms * +34%

* ... smaller is better

Vivo X200 FEVivo X200 Pro MiniSamsung Galaxy S25Google Pixel 9Xiaomi 15Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
62%
14%
-38%
58%
-8%
4%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
1867.08
3804.53
104%
3982.43
113%
1584.56
-15%
3934.92
111%
1867 ?(1023 - 2110, n=34)
0%
2213 ?(270 - 4370, n=189, last 2 years)
19%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
1756.13
3384.34
93%
2256.71
29%
256.48
-85%
3889.06
121%
1303 ?(575 - 1989, n=34)
-26%
1815 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=189, last 2 years)
3%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
300.78
302.11
0%
299.89
0%
226.41
-25%
296.95
-1%
288 ?(208 - 386, n=34)
-4%
295 ?(47.6 - 504, n=189, last 2 years)
-2%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
357.33
532.65
49%
51.76
-86%
266.19
-26%
360.36
1%
354 ?(64.8 - 745, n=34)
-1%
340 ?(9.4 - 964, n=189, last 2 years)
-5%

排放物 -Android 手机会变得非常热

温度

在持续负载情况下，手机表面温度非常高，我们测得的最高温度约为 47°C。在 3DMark 压力测试中，vivo 智能手机的运行速度有时会下降 40%以上，这一点也很突出。

Max. Load
 46.6 °C46.3 °C46 °C 
 47.3 °C46.6 °C45.3 °C 
 47.1 °C47.5 °C42.5 °C 
Maximum: 47.5 °C
Average: 46.1 °C
42.3 °C44.4 °C46.2 °C
42.3 °C44.7 °C46.9 °C
42.9 °C44.9 °C45.4 °C
Maximum: 46.9 °C
Average: 44.4 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.5 % +16%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.3 % +13%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.9 %
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.7 % -11%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 % -24%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71.3 % +11%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.7 % +7%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64.3 %
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.4 % -25%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47.5 % -26%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.9 % +7%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.5 %
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60.7 % -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.1 % -13%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.5 % +22%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.5 % +8%
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64.1 %
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61.2 % -5%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Vivo X200 FE Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø19.1 (17.2-26.7)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.2 (10.9-15.3)
Vivo X200 FE Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø63.4 (54.8-93)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.2 (36.3-53.1)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.2 (45.1-55.7)
Vivo X200 FE Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø18.3 (15.9-25.5)
Vivo X200 FE Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø9.75 (8.61-13.4)
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.79 (5.95-7.59)

发言人

立体声扬声器产生的低音效果可以说很差，但在同价位产品中还算不错。粉红噪声的特点是中音上升，高音相对陡降。此外，还可通过 USB 或蓝牙无线连接耳机。有多种音频编解码器可供选择。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.345.52530.338.73122.642.44024.531.85034.942.4632238.38020.935.410022.336.612517.74316016.755.420013.655.525016.356.631513.959.540014.760.750014.167.96301370.480013.673.4100012.775.9125014.376.9160012.875.3200013.277.425001478.4315013.381400013.982.2500013.682.8630013.875.3800013.370.61000013.564.81250013.567.91600012.863.2SPL25.790.1N0.779.4median 13.6median 70.6Delta0.78.433.237.826.831.523.62122.326.827.53320.523.920.724.619.328.215.735.913.655.716.255.415.553.715.155.810.961.69.969.512.166.614.172.214.275.612.974.614.271.312.772.212.77113.575.813.180.313.180.513.478.312.772.213.471.313.473.213.163.225.487.70.771.4median 13.4median 71.31.17.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo X200 FEGoogle Pixel 9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo X200 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 可快速充电的Android 智能手机

耗电量

至少在我们的版本中，vivo X200 FE 的特色之一是其 6500 毫安时的大容量电池，重量仅为 186 克。遗憾的是，在德国和奥地利，电池容量降至 5,300 mAh，但也可以通过 USB-C 端口充电，最高功率可达 90 瓦。

在我们使用 小米 2500 电源、充电时间约为 60 分钟。这款智能手机不支持无线充电。

X200 FE 的功耗并不明显。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.25 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.43 / 1.76 / 1.9 Watt
Load midlight 10.38 / 10.73 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Vivo X200 FE
6500 mAh		Vivo X200 Pro Mini
5700 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh		Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh		Xiaomi 15
5400 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-11%
-1%
-12%
18%
-107%
-7%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.43
0.6
-40%
0.47
-9%
0.66
-53%
0.5
-16%
1.943 ?(0.43 - 3.34, n=4)
-352%
0.855 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=158, last 2 years)
-99%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.76
1.6
9%
1.04
41%
1.49
15%
1.11
37%
3.13 ?(1.2 - 5, n=4)
-78%
1.423 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=158, last 2 years)
19%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.9
2.5
-32%
1.07
44%
1.78
6%
1.13
41%
3.23 ?(1.27 - 5.11, n=4)
-70%
1.586 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=158, last 2 years)
17%
Load Average * (Watt)
10.38
8.9
14%
13.33
-28%
7.44
28%
8.91
14%
10.6 ?(5.95 - 13.4, n=4)
-2%
7.12 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=140, last 2 years)
31%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
10.73
11.2
-4%
16.38
-53%
16.64
-55%
9.3
13%
14.1 ?(10.7 - 15.9, n=4)
-31%
11 ?(3.53 - 21.4, n=140, last 2 years)
-3%

* ... smaller is better

耗电量：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Vivo X200 FE MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.65 (0.504-10.7)
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.43 (0.81-13.9)
Vivo X200 FE MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.603-0.879)
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.645 (0.596-0.931)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Vivo X200 FE MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.28 (6.85-9.4)
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.15 (7.27-8.9)
Vivo X200 FE MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.699 (0.603-0.879)
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.645 (0.596-0.931)

电池寿命

vivo 手机是市场上最耐用的智能手机之一，机身小巧。在 Wi-Fi 测试中，我们可以使用 Chrome 浏览器上网超过 22.5 小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
22h 37min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Vivo X200 FE
6500 mAh
22.6 h
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
5700 mAh
19.2 h
Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh
18 h
Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh
16.5 h
Xiaomi 15
5400 mAh
22.8 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

凭借 X200 FE，vivo 推出了一款体积小巧的优秀智能手机。虽然 "FE "并不代表 "Fan Edition"（粉丝版），但三星的 FE 机型肯定可以从中借鉴一二。

Vivo X200 FE - 09/11/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
51 / 69 → 73%
Weight
90%
Battery
93%
Display
93%
Games Performance
35 / 55 → 64%
Application Performance
74 / 85 → 87%
AI Performance
76%
Temperature
83%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
82%
Average
70%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
35%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
97.6%
Repairability
30%
Software Updates
72.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 51.7%

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
84.8%
Vivo X200 FE
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $10.89
TNKISRY Tempered Glass for V...
2. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
3. $7.99
Lucyliy (3 packs) Compatible...
List Price: 799€		186 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.31"
2640x1216
461 PPI
AMOLED
2.
87.2%
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $7.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ...
2. $11.98
TNKISRY Cover for Vivo X200 ...
3. $2.88
2pcs Glass Camera Lens Prote...
List Price: 700€		187 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.31"
2640x1216
461 PPI
AMOLED
3.
88.9%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $7.58
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...
2. $7.58
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...
3. $16.99
Super Fast Charger Type C, 2...
List Price: 899€		162 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"
2340x1080
416 PPI
AMOLED
4.
84.9%
Google Pixel 9
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 128 GB 		Amazon:
1. $699.00
Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An...
2. $875.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke...
3. $1,525.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un...
List Price: 899€		198 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"
2424x1080
421 PPI
OLED
5.
88.4%
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $209.98
Xiaomi Watch S4 Smartwatch w...
2. $11.99
Ibywind for Xiaomi 15 Ultra ...
3. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 15 Screen...
List Price: 760€		191 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"
2670x1200
460 PPI
OLED

More articles related to this device

Vivo X200 FE (X200 Series)
News
•
电池续航时间超长、亮度超过 5000 nits、摄像头超强的紧凑型智能手机--梦想成真？
|
News
•
vivo X200 Ultra 在 DxOMark 相机测试中成为排名第二的旗舰手机，只有一款智能手机更胜一筹
|
News
•
人像之王：vivo X200 Ultra 再次碾压三星、Apple 、Oppo 等旗舰机
|
News
•
相机大战：300 美元手机击退 1870 美元手机，三星胜出
|
Review
•
2025 年最佳智能手机的视频和照片测试：三星与肖像并不匹配
|
Magazine
•
vivo X200 Ultra 现在通过进口更便宜了：为什么我没有在中国购买这款蔡司 35mm 摄像头旗舰手机？
|
News
•
vivo X200 Ultra：借助蔡司配件，Android 智能手机变身专业相机
|
Review
•
Android 智能手机中的突破性摄像头 - vivo X200 Ultra 评测
|
News
•
任何使用智能手机拍摄人像照片的人都会喜欢 vivo X200 Ultra。
|
News
•
vivo X200 Ultra：带蔡司远摄转换器的终极智能手机相机套装评测
|
News
•
vivo X300 Pro Mini 规格泄露，尽管显示屏 "小 "至 6.3 英寸，但仍配备大容量电池，带来旗舰级体验
|
News
•
vivo X200 Ultra 相机手柄：如何购买专属的 200 mm 蔡司长焦变焦镜头和摄影套件
|
News
•
vivo X200 Ultra 拆解视频详细展示全新蔡司三摄像头旗舰机
|
News
•
vivo 推出 X200s：配备三枚 5000 万像素蔡司相机和 6200 毫安时电池的超薄旗舰机
|
News
•
正式发布：vivo X200 Ultra 发布日期确定，同时发布首张媒体照片
|
News
•
vivo X200 Ultra：大规模 35mm 蔡司相机出现在泄露的上手视频中
|
News
•
vivo X200 Ultra：专用快门按钮与 iPhone 16 Pro Max 的相机控制功能对比
|
News
•
vivo X200 Pro 的巨大成功可能带来全球版的终极蔡司相机旗舰机
...

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 一款拥有顶级硬件和 XXL 电池的小巧Android 智能手机 - vivo X200 FE 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-09-19 (Update: 2025-09-19)