Notebookcheck

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max智能手机评测--功能强大,体积庞大,功能齐全

一个有更新的巨人。 Apple 再次将iPhone 13 Pro Max定位为2021年拥有绝对顶级技术的矛头。关键词是:120Hz的ProMotion显示屏,改进的摄像头,新的Apple A15芯片,以及可选的1TB存储。我们详细了解一下这款顶级机型。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Apple iPhone Smartphone
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

比iPhone 13 Pro Max更多的iPhone目前是不可能的。Apple"2021年这一代最大的智能手机带来了加州人所能想到的一切新技术。Apple 智能手机包括一个巨大的120-Hz显示屏,对角线为6.7英寸,是本次测试时最快的SoC之一,以及高达1TB的存储空间。

虽然Apple"的顶级型号当然不是很实惠,但我们详细看看它是否值得其价格。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (iPhone Series)
Processor
Apple A15 Bionic 6 x - 3.2 GHz
Graphics adapter
Apple A15 GPU 5-Core
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
6.70 inch 19.5:9, 2778 x 1284 pixel 457 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, Super Retina XDR display, HDR10, Dolby Vision, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB 
, 115 GB free
Connections
Audio Connections: audio via Lightning port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B30/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B46/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n25/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n66/​n77/​n78/​n79) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 160.8 x 78.1
Battery
4352 mAh Lithium-Ion, charging: 20W (Lightning), 15W (MagSafe), 7.5W (Qi)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple iOS 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​1.5, phase comparison AF (dual-pixel), OIS, dual LED flash, videos @2160p/​60fps (camera 1); 12.0MP, f/​2.8, phase comparison AF, OIS, telephoto lens (camera 2); 12.0MP, f/​1.8, wide angle lens (camera 3); ToF (LiDAR) (camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix f/2.2, 23mm, 1/3.6", videos @2160p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), Keyboard: virtual keyboard, USB-C-to-Lightning cable, 12 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.99W/​kg (head), 0.98W/​kg (body); dual SIM; IP68 certified, fanless, waterproof
Weight
238 g
Price
1249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90.4 %
10/2021
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
238 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2778x1284
88.6 %
10/2020
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
A14, A14 Bionic GPU
228 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2778x1284
90.2 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14
227 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3200x1440
86.8 %
06/2021
Sony Xperia 1 III
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
186 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.50"3840x1644
89.1 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
234 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"3200x1440
88.4 %
04/2021
OnePlus 9 Pro
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
197 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440

由于其稍宽的结构,iPhone 13 Pro Max是一款适合大手的智能手机。它的重量为238克(约8.4盎司),拿在手里感觉很重。虽然这与高质量的印象相辅相成,但你也不得不喜欢这样一个沉重的智能手机。

正如我们习惯于从Apple ,材料选择和做工都非常好。边缘闪亮的不锈钢边框看起来很优雅,但也是一个一流的指纹磁铁。

同时,几乎没有人会在不戴保护套的情况下使用他们昂贵的iPhone,即使它再次使用Apple"陶瓷盾 "玻璃,也能很好地抵御跌落。当然这只能达到一定的坠落高度,所以为你昂贵的Apple 智能手机获得一些额外的保护是有意义的。

在这一点上,摄像头从外壳上伸出2-3毫米(约0.08-0.12英寸),所以尽管使用了蓝宝石玻璃,但摄像头的镜头是相当不受保护的。凸起也意味着,当你试图在桌子上操作iPhone 13 Pro Max时,它将大幅晃动。

前面的缺口仍然很大,但至少比前代产品的缺口要小。

当然,根据IP68标准,iPhone 13 Pro Max还可以免受有害环境的影响。关于环境:Apple ,其大型iPhone使用了许多可回收的材料,还发布了一份详细的环境报告。

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

Size Comparison

165.1 mm 75.6 mm 8.9 mm 227 g165 mm 71 mm 8.2 mm 186 g164.3 mm 74.6 mm 8.38 mm 234 g163.2 mm 73.6 mm 8.7 mm 197 g160.8 mm 78.1 mm 7.7 mm 238 g160.8 mm 78.1 mm 7.4 mm 228 g

设备--iPhone中最多有1TB的存储空间

在这一点上,你可以花高达1829欧元(约2124美元)购买iPhone 13家族中最昂贵的设备--这是一个新的记录。尽管Apple ,与去年相比,存储版本的价格保持不变,但具有1TB存储空间的新选项增加了一个巨大的溢价。

详细来说,这些设备在推出时的成本如下。

  • 拥有128GB存储空间的iPhone 13 Pro Max。1249欧元(约1451美元
  • 拥有256GB存储空间的iPhone 13 Pro Max。1369欧元(约合人民币1590
  • 拥有512GB存储空间的iPhone 13 Pro Max。1599欧元(约合人民币1857
  • 拥有1TB存储空间的iPhone 13 Pro Max。1829欧元(约合人民币2124

工作内存又是6GB。

iPhone 13 Pro Max是作为双SIM卡出售的,尽管它实际上只有一个Nano SIM卡的物理插槽。不过,你可以并行使用一张eSIM卡,从而也可以享受两个不同的关税,或使用不同国家的SIM卡。

当然,iPhone 13 Pro Max也再次提供了MagSafe,即背面的磁环,允许你安装一些配件或为设备充电。

左边:通知滑块、音量键、SIM卡插槽
左边:通知滑块、音量键、SIM卡插槽
右:待机键
右:待机键
顶部:没有连接
顶部:没有连接
底部:麦克风、Lightning 端口、扬声器
底部:麦克风、Lightning 端口、扬声器

软件 - iOS 15的数据安全报告

Apple ,在iPhone上一直使用自己的iOS操作系统。如果你来自Android ,你首先要习惯几个新东西。此外,iOS还限制了一些选择,以保护没有经验的用户的安全。

在iOS 15中,Apple ,再次引入了许多变化,但它们涉及的不是底层结构,而是预装的应用程序,它们提供了一套相当广泛的工具,而无需额外费用。例如,现在更容易使用Facetime进行视频会议,或一起观看视频或听音乐。

一个广泛的变化是聚焦模式,当你必须专注于特定的任务,并希望完全屏蔽一些干扰时,你可以激活它。照片中的新文本识别是另一个有趣的功能,它允许你从照片中复制文本并立即将其粘贴到文档中。

在安全方面,也有一些小的改进。例如,iPhone现在对应用程序处理用户数据的方式进行了更多限制,它还自动为用户创建了一份数据安全报告。

iPhone 13 Pro Max软件
iPhone 13 Pro Max软件
iPhone 13 Pro Max软件

通信和GNSS - 一个真正的世界性电话

对于2021年的高端智能手机来说,WiFi 6和5G当然是一个荣誉问题,而大型iPhone在这方面也没有让人失望。它甚至更进一步,提供了相当多的4G和5G频段,让你几乎可以在世界任何地方使用它。

然而,对于一个绝对的顶级设备,新的WiFi 6E WLAN标准的三频和5G mmWave是缺乏的。尽管这两者目前都没怎么使用,但它们会有助于使智能手机更加适应未来。

结合我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器,我们的测试装置实现了良好的传输速率,但最终也有一些高端智能手机的速度更快。信号质量和传输的稳定性都非常好。

在4G网络中,智能手机也显示出良好的信号质量,即使在室内。有了这个,它就达到了其他高端智能手机的水平。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1190 (1121min - 1230max) MBit/s ∼100% +36%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
875 (836min - 889max) MBit/s ∼74%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
848 (822min - 881max) MBit/s ∼71% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
803 (437min - 889max) MBit/s ∼67% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
633 (523min - 703max) MBit/s ∼53% -28%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
680 (649min - 703max) MBit/s ∼57% -22%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
676 (632min - 694max) MBit/s ∼57% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=285, last 2 years)
476 MBit/s ∼40% -46%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
922 (904min - 928max) MBit/s ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 (156min - 180max) MBit/s ∼18% -76%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
839 (806min - 865max) MBit/s ∼91% +17%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
799 (635min - 854max) MBit/s ∼87% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
779 (363min - 824max) MBit/s ∼84% +8%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
718 (707min - 724max) MBit/s ∼78%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
575 (364min - 613max) MBit/s ∼62% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=285, last 2 years)
468 MBit/s ∼51% -35%
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810855Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø718 (707-724)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (836-889)

当你走到户外时,可以相当迅速地确定位置,精确度可达3米(约10英尺)。在卫星网络方面,使用了GPS、A-GPS、GLONASS和Galileo。

在我们的实际测试中,我们去骑自行车,将大型iPhone与Garmin Edge 830专业导航设备进行比较。Apple 智能手机在这里做得非常好,即使在一些小巷子里也能准确定位我们。过桥时有一些较小的偏差。

Garmin Edge 830的定位 - 概述
Garmin Edge 830的定位 - 概述
Garmin Edge 830的定位 - 转折点
Garmin Edge 830的定位 - 转折点
Garmin Edge 830的定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Edge 830的定位 - 桥梁
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max的定位 - 概述
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max的定位 - 概述
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max的定位 - 转折点
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max的定位 - 转折点
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max的定位 - 桥梁
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max的定位 - 桥梁

电话功能和语音质量 - 稍微安静的听筒

iPhone 13 Pro Max的听筒对于日常操作来说是足够大的。然而,当你周围有很多事情发生时,即使在最大音量下,有时也很难理解你的对话伙伴。当我们小声说话时,麦克风也能很好地记录我们的声音。

通过扬声器电话,你也可以得到一个容易理解的声音再现,但在嘈杂的环境中使用扬声器可能太安静。我们自己的声音在这里也能清晰地传递给我们的对话伙伴。

照相机 - 非常明亮,色彩强烈

用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

乍一看,与旧款iPhone Pro Max相比,相机设备没有变化,但Apple ,在细节上升级了几处。例如,根据规格,制造商使用了新的传感器,主镜头和广角镜头的光圈数也大幅下降。另一方面,长焦镜头现在的光圈甚至比在 iPhone 12 Pro Max,所以它最初记录的光线更少。但现在长焦镜头有3倍的变焦,而且现在在三个镜头之间小步放大或缩小的选项也导致了整体的6倍变焦。

虽然与上一代较小的专业机型仍有一些区别,但 iPhone 13 Pro和Pro Max拥有完全相同的相机设备。

1200万像素的主摄像头在白天拍摄的照片确实不错,提供了强烈的色彩,而且在焦距范围内的细节也非常准确。另一方面,一加9 Pro的自动相机能更好地捕捉夜晚的氛围。 OnePlus 9 Pro和单反相机,而iPhone可能试图让照片尽可能的明亮。在光线很弱、对比度很高的情况下,iPhone 13 Pro Max以良好的照明和许多细节取得了成绩。

广角镜头也能拍出非常锐利的照片,具有强大的色彩,但较远的细节也仍然难以辨认。

你也不能用iPhone 13 Pro Max录制8K视频。另一方面,4K视频有一个完整的工作流程,从录制开始,一直到用Apple's ProRes专业编解码器切割。然而,在这里你应该注意到128GB型号的限制,它只能以30fps的速度录制1080p的ProRes视频。

虽然你可以使用背面的所有摄像头来录制视频,但Apple ,这里是在作弊。大多数时候,摄像头之间没有切换,设备在进行录制前会选择最佳镜头。这意味着有可能只使用超广角镜头的数码变焦,例如,这当然会限制录音的质量。或者在录制过程中不能使用广角镜头,因为它是用主镜头开始的。

仍然是这样,那些喜欢自己调整照片所有参数的人应该避免使用Apple's inhouse camera app,因为它主要集中在自动功能上,允许任何人拍摄像样的照片。因此,对于专业人士来说,建议尝试App Store中的其他众多相机应用程序。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera

在演播室的受控光线条件下,测试图显得非常清晰,颜色看起来很强烈。在照明度只有1Lux的情况下,物体被很好地提亮,但有的地方显得很斑驳。

在良好的光照条件下,颜色的再现显然过于明亮,这一点我们已经在周围的照片中注意到了。

ColorChecker
16.4 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max: 11.57 ∆E min: 3.85 - max: 19.41 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max: 6.28 ∆E min: 2.57 - max: 14.45 ∆E

配件和保修 - 广泛的配件市场

iPhone 13 Pro Max的包装盒非常薄,实际上我们只发现设备本身,一条USB-C-toLightning 电缆,一个SIM卡工具,以及一些文件。你必须从Apple ,额外花25欧元(约29美元)购买充电器。Apple ,说它想以此来帮助环保,因为许多用户家里已经有了充电器。但当然,该公司也通过不随手机附送充电器节省了大量资金。

由于同时只有相对较少的机型,iPhone配件的市场是巨大的。第三方制造商提供任何你能想到的配件,从放在相机上的额外镜头开始,到自行车上的iPhone支架和可以容纳iPhone的特殊无人机,再到巧克力棒形状的疯狂盖子。

Apple's own offer range from the corresponding covers with MagSafe in numerous colorsfor 55 Euros (~$64) up to a MagSafe charger for 45 Euros (~$52) or a magnetic card holder for 65 Euros (~$75), for example.

你只能从制造商那里得到12个月的保修期,但许多欧洲国家还要求为客户提供24个月的供应商保修。那些想扩大保修范围的人可以通过购买一些特殊的智能手机保险来实现,比如Apple 自己提供的AppleCare+。然而,Apple'的报价仍然只涵盖一年,而且只保护意外损坏。此外,你仍然需要支付免赔额。

输入设备和操作 - 支持红外线的FaceID

触摸屏对输入的反应非常准确和迅速。由于采用了新的ProMotion技术,也就是自适应120赫兹刷新率的名称,它也可以非常流畅地操作。

该智能手机可以使用Apple"FaceID "解锁,这是一种人脸识别,前面有红外和深度传感器支持,被认为非常安全。然而,有点恼人的是,FaceID只在你以纵向持有智能手机的情况下工作。

键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 横向

展示 - 介绍ProMotion

子像素网格
子像素网格

连同iPhone 13 Pro,Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max是首批提供ProMotion的Apple 智能手机之一。这是一种自适应刷新率,由系统在10赫兹(例如阅读静态文件时)和120赫兹(快速滚动)之间根据使用场景进行调整 。然而,这也意味着用户无法调整刷新率。

2778 x 1284像素,分辨率略高于 iPhone 13 Pro以弥补更大的显示屏,最终仍然是每英寸的像素密度差不多。超级视网膜XDR显示屏是一个OLED面板,经过HDR和杜比视界认证。

在亮度方面,它的表现与iPhone 13 Pro的显示屏相似。iPhone 13 Pro.必要时超过1000cd/m²,在较大的区域也能达到很高的亮度,而且凭借OLED技术,它还能显示几乎完全的黑色。

1059
cd/m²
1060
cd/m²
1067
cd/m²
1059
cd/m²
1049
cd/m²
1059
cd/m²
1064
cd/m²
1066
cd/m²
1058
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1067 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1060.1 cd/m² Minimum: 6.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1049 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.78 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.181
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
OLED, 2778x1284, 6.70
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
OLED, 2778x1284, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.80
Sony Xperia 1 III
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.50
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.81
OnePlus 9 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Screen
-33%
-73%
-266%
-59%
-36%
Brightness middle
1049
855
-18%
910
-13%
537
-49%
891
-15%
733
-30%
Brightness
1060
857
-19%
913
-14%
539
-49%
888
-16%
746
-30%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
98
0%
95
-3%
99
1%
97
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.78
1.1
-41%
2
-156%
4.78
-513%
1.9
-144%
0.95
-22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.72
2.51
-46%
3.1
-80%
7.83
-355%
3.7
-115%
2.01
-17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.8
1.4
-75%
2.2
-175%
5.8
-625%
1.3
-63%
1.7
-113%
Gamma
2.181 101%
2.187 101%
2.06 107%
2.363 93%
2.3 96%
2.21 100%
CCT
6559 99%
6337 103%
6512 100%
7982 81%
6527 100%
6591 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20897 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

如同OLED显示器一样,我们注意到有闪烁现象。然而,与此同时,在低亮度时,振幅变平,频率下降。这意味着Apple ,可能是在其面板控制中集成了直流调光,在低亮度时变得有效。虽然在有疑问时,你仍然应该在做出购买决定之前试用该显示器,但我们相信,这种烦扰比其他没有直流调光的OLED显示器要低。

我们用光谱光度计和CalMAN软件测量显示器的色彩准确性。Apple ,该显示器在这里取得了非常好的数值,因此你也可以用该显示器来评估专业领域的色彩。然而,为了安全起见,你应该关闭TrueTone,因为该传感器会根据周围的光线来调整颜色。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
卡尔曼的色彩准确度
卡尔曼的色彩准确度
卡尔曼DCI P3色彩空间
卡尔曼DCI P3色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

由于显示屏在必要时非常明亮,即使在非常明亮的阳光下,iPhone 13 Pro Max几乎没有任何问题。然而,周围环境的反射对眼睛来说还是很吃力的。

对可视角度没有任何抱怨,因此,即使从非常陡峭的视角,你仍然可以轻松识别图像。

视角
视角
在户外使用智能手机
在户外使用智能手机

性能 - 最快的智能手机之一

凭借新的Apple A15 Bionic,iPhone 13 Pro Max也使用了目前市场上最强大的SoC之一。与之相比 iPad Mini相比,你可以得到高达3.2GHz的全时钟速度,而与之相比 iPhone 13iPhone 13 Mini与iPhone 13和iPhone 13 Mini相比,它甚至有一个5核的GPU,所以这里的图形应该有更大的能量。

事实上,iPhone 13 Pro Max在几乎所有的基准测试中都达到了最高值。同时,Apple 智能手机也证明了自己在日常操作中快如闪电,甚至在多任务处理视频叠加和高要求的应用程序,如控制无人机或增强现实。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1742 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
1326 Points ∼76% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1106 Points ∼63% -37%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1134 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
989 Points ∼57% -43%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1129 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (1590 - 1755, n=6)
1717 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=267, last 2 years)
612 Points ∼35% -65%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4914 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3476 Points ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
3583 Points ∼73% -27%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3629 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3462 Points ∼70% -30%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3666 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (4559 - 4914, n=6)
4763 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=267, last 2 years)
2073 Points ∼42% -58%
Metal Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
13897 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
7252 Points ∼52% -48%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (10572 - 14115, n=5)
12625 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7252 - 14115, n=7, last 2 years)
10724 Points ∼77% -23%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5782 Points ∼69%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
7294 Points ∼87% +26%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
8345 Points ∼100% +44%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6110 Points ∼73% +6%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8347 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (5713 - 6175, n=5)
5870 Points ∼70% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=258, last 2 years)
3708 Points ∼44% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
16202 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
11824 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10794 Points ∼67% -33%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10037 Points ∼62% -38%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11050 Points ∼68% -32%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (9878 - 16221, n=5)
13743 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=258, last 2 years)
4363 Points ∼27% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1902 Points ∼41%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3115 Points ∼67% +64%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4651 Points ∼100% +145%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
2579 Points ∼55% +36%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4497 Points ∼97% +136%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (1852 - 2307, n=5)
2027 Points ∼44% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=258, last 2 years)
3172 Points ∼68% +67%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
9680 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5756 Points ∼59% -41%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5851 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5689 Points ∼59% -41%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5736 Points ∼59% -41%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (8788 - 9680, n=5)
9295 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9927, n=139, last 2 years)
2974 Points ∼31% -69%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
11688 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5873 Points ∼50% -50%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5850 Points ∼50% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5734 Points ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5737 Points ∼49% -51%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (9881 - 11700, n=5)
10833 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=136, last 2 years)
3079 Points ∼26% -74%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3080 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1871 Points ∼61% -39%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1497 Points ∼49% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1552 Points ∼50% -50%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (2243 - 3080, n=5)
2744 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=87, last 2 years)
917 Points ∼30% -70%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2817 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1758 Points ∼62% -38%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1423 Points ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1498 Points ∼53% -47%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (2151 - 2864, n=5)
2554 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 4236, n=86, last 2 years)
927 Points ∼33% -67%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps ∼50%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
104 fps ∼87% +73%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
120 fps ∼100% +100%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (60 - 60.1, n=5)
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=210, last 2 years)
64.6 fps ∼54% +8%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
409.6 fps ∼99%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
313.8 fps ∼76% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
154 fps ∼37% -62%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
281 fps ∼68% -31%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
258 fps ∼63% -37%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (375 - 440, n=5)
412 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 425, n=210, last 2 years)
122 fps ∼30% -70%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps ∼61%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
59.8 fps ∼61% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps ∼70% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
98 fps ∼100% +63%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps ∼61% 0%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (60 - 60.2, n=5)
60.1 fps ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=209, last 2 years)
51.9 fps ∼53% -13%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
227.9 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
170.4 fps ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
117 fps ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
177 fps ∼78% -22%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
151 fps ∼66% -34%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (166 - 237, n=5)
215 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 251, n=210, last 2 years)
71 fps ∼31% -69%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
60 fps ∼97%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
59 fps ∼95% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
51 fps ∼82% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
62 fps ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
57 fps ∼92% -5%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (60 - 60.1, n=5)
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=208, last 2 years)
40.3 fps ∼65% -33%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
144 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
106 fps ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
74 fps ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
121 fps ∼84% -16%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
69 fps ∼48% -52%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (125 - 154, n=5)
143 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=208, last 2 years)
48.9 fps ∼34% -66%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
53.16 fps ∼94%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
42.9 fps ∼76% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
30 fps ∼53% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
35 fps ∼62% -34%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
36 fps ∼63% -32%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (53.2 - 60, n=5)
56.7 fps ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=207, last 2 years)
25.1 fps ∼44% -53%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
92.9 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
75 fps ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
58 fps ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
71 fps ∼76% -24%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
59 fps ∼64% -36%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (68.8 - 99.2, n=5)
90.5 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=207, last 2 years)
29.3 fps ∼32% -68%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
59.1 fps ∼99%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
53.5 fps ∼90% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
37 fps ∼62% -37%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
53 fps ∼89% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
44 fps ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps ∼92% -7%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (59.1 - 60.1, n=4)
59.7 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=268, last 2 years)
25.8 fps ∼43% -56%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
108 fps ∼98%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
85 fps ∼77% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps ∼63% -36%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
66 fps ∼60% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
85 fps ∼77% -21%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
63 fps ∼57% -42%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (95.9 - 119, n=5)
110 fps ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 257, n=268, last 2 years)
30.4 fps ∼28% -72%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
54.8 fps ∼99%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
40 fps ∼72% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
26 fps ∼47% -53%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
37 fps ∼67% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
26 fps ∼47% -53%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
42 fps ∼76% -23%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (51.8 - 60, n=5)
55.6 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 60, n=269, last 2 years)
17.3 fps ∼31% -68%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
37.9 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
30 fps ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
28 fps ∼74% -26%
Sony Xperia 1 III
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
27 fps ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
30 fps ∼79% -21%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps ∼74% -26%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (34.6 - 41.2, n=5)
38 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=269, last 2 years)
11.7 fps ∼31% -69%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
800222 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
749520 Points ∼93% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
801983 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (722973 - 813876, n=5)
782472 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117053 - 962824, n=74, last 2 years)
505616 Points ∼63% -37%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
107460 Points ∼41%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
92533 Points ∼35% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
241222 Points ∼92% +124%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
262983 Points ∼100% +145%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
  (105536 - 107460, n=4)
106113 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=96, last 2 years)
65667 Points ∼25% -39%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
8124 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6247 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6365 Points ∼78% -22%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6959 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
 
8124 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 8124, n=195, last 2 years)
3938 Points ∼48% -52%
System (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
19657 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10936 Points ∼56% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9696 Points ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11774 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
 
19657 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 19657, n=195, last 2 years)
7132 Points ∼36% -64%
Memory (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3612 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6588 Points ∼73% +82%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
7453 Points ∼82% +106%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9044 Points ∼100% +150%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
 
3612 Points ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=195, last 2 years)
4620 Points ∼51% +28%
Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
25642 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
14362 Points ∼56% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12776 Points ∼50% -50%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13463 Points ∼53% -47%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
 
25642 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 25642, n=195, last 2 years)
6294 Points ∼25% -75%
Web (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2392 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1471 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1782 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1633 Points ∼68% -32%
Average Apple A15 Bionic
 
2392 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=195, last 2 years)
1332 Points ∼56% -44%

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max在上网时也非常快。大多数时候,滚动页面时已经加载了图片,而HTML 5也很难使智能手机接近极限。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
181.835 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (173 - 182, n=5)
179 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
158.281 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
94.324 Points ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
76.623 Points ∼42% -58%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
63.192 Points ∼35% -65%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182, n=187, last 2 years)
55.2 Points ∼30% -70%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
402.85 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (383 - 414, n=5)
398 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
375.22 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
160.92 Points ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
127.31 Points ∼32% -68%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
124.52 Points ∼31% -69%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=196, last 2 years)
100 Points ∼25% -75%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
242 runs/min ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (228 - 244, n=5)
239 runs/min ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
188 runs/min ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
98 runs/min ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
84.1 runs/min ∼35% -65%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
56 runs/min ∼23% -77%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=172, last 2 years)
54.1 runs/min ∼22% -78%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
248 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (219 - 252, n=5)
243 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
191 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
141 Points ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
132 Points ∼53% -47%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 4689)
103 Points ∼42% -58%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=201, last 2 years)
83.6 Points ∼34% -66%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
63831 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (57143 - 64222, n=5)
62098 Points ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
58632 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
33423 Points ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
27275 Points ∼43% -57%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
26829 Points ∼42% -58%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=207, last 2 years)
19812 Points ∼31% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=209, last 2 years)
3578 ms * ∼100% -763%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
1808 ms * ∼51% -336%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
1785.6 ms * ∼50% -330%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
1782.32 ms * ∼50% -330%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
467 ms * ∼13% -13%
Average Apple A15 Bionic (414 - 455, n=5)
429 ms * ∼12% -3%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)
414.8 ms * ∼12%

* ... smaller is better

游戏--ProMotion还没有提供任何优势

iPhone 13 Pro Max非常适用于游戏,但(还)没有超过60帧,因为大多数游戏还没有为此进行优化或启用。

然而,在快速的Armajet射击游戏中,你可以达到非常稳定的60帧,也可以在PUBG的大多数模式中,除了UltraHD。我们使用GameBench测量帧率.

游戏制造商和Apple ,在以120帧运行游戏时,一再指出电池寿命的问题,所以如果他们对启用快速帧率犹豫不决,那可能不是由于SoC的性能。

如果游戏没有得到优化,凹槽和圆角可能成为一个问题,因为它们会隐藏游戏内容。你可以很容易地从截图中看到,大多数应用程序的程序员已经将操作元素向图像中心移动,以避免这个问题。

沥青9
沥青9
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.1 (46-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 3.1.2: Ø33.6 (27-55)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.6.0: Ø59.5 (58-60)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.6.0: Ø59.4 (58-60)
; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 1.6.0: Ø41 (37-51)

排放 - 明显的轻微节流现象

温度

经过较长时间的负载,iPhone 13 Pro Max的外壳会明显升温,但这既不是关键,也不会让人感到不舒服。然而,如果你在非常热的环境中操作智能手机并将其置于负载之下,情况可能会改变。

在性能稳定性方面,最大的iPhone的表现与较小的 iPhone 13 Pro:可能会有高达10%的性能下降。然而,即使在这之后,性能能力仍然足够高,这不会造成任何问题。

Max. Load
 37.7 °C36.6 °C34.2 °C 
 41.3 °C38 °C34.7 °C 
 43.1 °C38.4 °C34 °C 
Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 37.6 °C
35 °C38.1 °C33.7 °C
35.7 °C40.1 °C41.7 °C
35.5 °C42.9 °C44.5 °C
Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 38.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92.5 (5288min) % ∼100% +15%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
80.1 (44.5min) % ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64.7 (22.3min) % ∼70% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64.4 (3633min) % ∼70% -20%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.3 (3461min) % ∼65% -25%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93.5 (1404min) % ∼100% +21%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
77 (12.3min) % ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.3 (1197min) % ∼66% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.8 (7.01min) % ∼64% -22%
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (12.3-16)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø8.98 (7.01-11.7)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47 (44.5-55.5)
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø25.4 (22.3-34.4)
热图--正面
热图--正面
热图 - 背面
热图 - 背面

演讲者

通过使用听筒作为第二个扬声器,iPhone 13 Pro Max能够在横向格式中创造立体声效果。在我们用ARTA软件的测量中,我们确定声音频谱变得比前代产品更加平衡。特别是在中等音量下,声音显得相当饱满,我们也能在声谱中听到一些低音。

然而,当你把音量增加到最大时,声音明显变平,一些频率变得模糊不清。总的来说,iPhone 13 Pro Max为高端智能手机提供了体面的扬声器,但与其他设备相比几乎没有突出之处。

Lightning 连接可作为有线耳机的音频端口。这意味着,只有使用一些特殊的配件才能同时进行充电和听音乐。但当然,你也可以使用蓝牙进行无线音频再现。然而,高通公司的aptX编解码器在这里继续缺失,所以你必须确保你的无线耳机支持Apple 编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.738.92535.637.93133.9334033.436.75033.7376328.930.38022.925.710021.532.412521.441.716016.248.620013.850.125012.253.531510.754.54008.658.450010.461.963011.962.980013.365.7100010.266.912509.269.516009.269.920009.771.3250010.770.8315012.669.1400014.267.2500015.358.3630014.663.6800015.767.41000016.571.81250015.8651600016.455.5SPL25.280.2N0.647.3median 13.3median 63.6Delta2.76.635.941.833.737.7253029.329.83331.825.626.120.826.122.634.115.342.514.249.31248.21147.110.8509.351.99.857.1116111.26012.86113.66712.86912.772.413.872.214.372.61569.615.76516.760.417.667.418.47419.36820.149.166.326.981.219.50.746.5median 13.8median 612.79.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone 13 Pro MaxApple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命--更大的电池带来了出色的电池寿命

消耗功率

iPhone 13 Pro Max再次表明,Apple 知道如何通过设计系统本身来优化其智能手机的电源效率。由于采用了新的SoC,在我们的测试中,这款智能手机的效率甚至比它的前辈略高。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.6 / 1.5 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 3.5 / 4.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
4352 mAh
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
3687 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
5000 mAh
OnePlus 9 Pro
4500 mAh
Average Apple A15 Bionic
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-9%
-48%
-52%
-91%
-18%
-36%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.8
-33%
1.06
-77%
1.13
-88%
1.6
-167%
0.676 ?(0.51 - 1.1, n=5)
-13%
0.935 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=222, last 2 years)
-56%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.5
-0%
1.19
21%
1.67
-11%
2
-33%
1.524 ?(1 - 2.2, n=5)
-2%
1.772 ?(0.65 - 3.94, n=222, last 2 years)
-18%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.9
-19%
1.2
25%
1.69
-6%
2.4
-50%
2.02 ?(1.3 - 4.2, n=5)
-26%
2.01 ?(0.69 - 4.01, n=222, last 2 years)
-26%
Load Average *
3.5
3.4
3%
6.46
-85%
5.17
-48%
6.2
-77%
4.08 ?(2.65 - 6.7, n=5)
-17%
4.49 ?(2.1 - 8.4, n=222, last 2 years)
-28%
Load Maximum *
4.8
4.7
2%
10.76
-124%
9.9
-106%
11
-129%
6.43 ?(3.56 - 11.4, n=5)
-34%
7.38 ?(3.56 - 12.3, n=222, last 2 years)
-54%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
: Ø4.63 (0.728-10.5)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.75 (8.24-9.27)
; Idle 1min: Ø0.773 (0.705-0.881)

电池寿命

Apple ,电池容量大量增加。现在是4352毫安时,而处理器中是3687毫安时,容量增加了近20%。

iPhone 13 Pro Max仍然是一款电池寿命非常长的智能手机,在WLAN上上网时可持续近18小时。在满负荷和全亮度的情况下,这款智能手机仍能维持7:32小时。然而,由于它有一个更明亮的显示屏,在最大亮度下,与前代产品相比,差异并不像其他固定亮度的情况下那么大。

你可以继续使用有线充电,以20瓦的功率为智能手机充电,然后需要略多于一个小时的时间来充电。你也可以通过MagSafe以15瓦的功率充电,或使用Qi标准以7.5瓦的功率充电。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
47h 26min
WiFi Websurfing
17h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
25h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)
7h 32min
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
4352 mAh
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
3687 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia 1 III
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
5000 mAh
OnePlus 9 Pro
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
-33%
-50%
-43%
-23%
Reader / Idle
2846
2611
-8%
1408
-51%
1108
-61%
2113
-26%
H.264
1522
1356
-11%
1310
-14%
1006
-34%
1076
-29%
WiFi v1.3
1067
961
-10%
702
-34%
534
-50%
650
-39%
1002
-6%
Load
452
423
-6%
304
-33%
276
-39%
316
-30%

Pros

+ 高品质外壳
+ 大量的可选存储空间
+ 快速的WLAN
+ 许多5G和4G的频率
+ 准确定位
+ 非常快的120-Hz显示屏
+ 非常高的性能
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 只有12个月的保修期
- 显著的相机凸起
- 在较长的负载下有轻微的节流现象
- 相对平庸的充电速度
- 大缺口

结论 - 一个具有120赫兹的高端智能手机

测试Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max。
测试Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max。

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max又变成了一个伟大的高科技作品,也带来了一些真正的创新,例如,120-Hz显示屏。去年已经有一次设计更新,所以iPhone 13 Pro Max几乎无法与iPhone 12 Pro Max在这方面的区别。

然而,里面的东西看起来不同。新的 A15仿生芯片再次提供了一个重大的性能跳跃,电池尺寸明显增加,智能手机在日常操作中持续时间更长。显示屏再次变亮,继续显示出色的色彩,现在提供某种直流调光的亮度控制。巨大的1TB存储空间的新存储选项很好,但也很昂贵。

我们已经从Android 智能手机知道,120赫兹的显示屏(仍然)在游戏中没有任何区别。显然,人们对智能手机的电池寿命有些担心。 显著的摄像头凸起也可能会惹恼一些用户,但以目前的技术,这可能很难避免。

凭借锐利的摄像头、大量的性能和高质量的外壳,iPhone 13 Pro Max又变成了一款伟大的智能手机,现在甚至带来了120Hz的显示屏。

对于那些希望尽可能多地控制自己系统的用户来说,iPhone仍然难以胜任。ROOT它是相当困难的,而一些Android ,如OnePlus或索尼的制造商甚至提供积极的支持。此外,许多设置,如刷新率是由系统控制的,用户无法改变。虽然这对没有经验的用户来说可能是明智的,但对有经验的用户来说,有时会感到很沮丧。另一方面,Apple ,在提供数据安全方面做出了一些努力,并为其iPhone提供了长时间的更新。因此,你必须权衡什么对你更重要。

那些想节省一些钱的人仍然可以得到 Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max一些供应商,这仍然代表着2021年的一个非常高质量的智能手机。随着 iPhone 13 Pro,你可以在一个更紧凑的格式中获得相同的功能。而高质量的Android 智能手机,如 三星Galaxy S21 Ultra如果你不想参与到iOS和Apple 宇宙中去,也是一种选择。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

iPhone 13 Pro Max在Apple 商店起价为1099美元.这款智能手机也可以从许多供应商那里买到,如 亚马逊.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max - 10/24/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
93%
Keyboard
68 / 75 → 91%
Pointing Device
98%
Connectivity
60 / 70 → 86%
Weight
87%
Battery
93%
Display
93%
Games Performance
65 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
95 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
81%
Average
85%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Mark Riege
Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 282 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18419 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max智能手机评测--功能强大,体积庞大,功能齐全
Florian Schmitt, 2021-10-27 (Update: 2021-10-27)