Schenker XMG Focus 17 (E23) in review:配备RTX 4070的游戏笔记本在性能上毫不逊色
Schenker XMG Focus 17 E23游戏笔记本(裸机:NP70SNE-G)专注于基本要素。凭借出色的 i9处理器和可选的RTX 4050, 4060,或 4070有足够的性能用于游戏。该显示器还提供240赫兹和足够的像素量。
然而,没有非凡的额外功能,特殊功能,或最好的设计。与我们上次对XMG Focus 17的审查相比,该机箱已经发生了变化。 XMG Focus 17 (Clevo NP70HK)2021年,所以在这篇文章中可以找到更多关于机箱、构造和设备的详细信息。除了游戏性能外,这款笔记本电脑也相当适中。作为回报,它保持在2000欧元以下(取决于配置),在我们测试的顶级配置中也没有贵多少。
竞争对手如 Medion Erazer Major X20或 联想Legion Pro 5走的是类似的路线,使用的是类似的硬件。然而,正如我们的详细测试更新所显示的那样,他们没有像申克的笔记本电脑那样持续保存。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.9 % | 06/2023 | SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 29.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
88.4 % | 05/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89 % | 04/2023 | Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 29 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.6 % | 09/2022 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 27 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.4 % | 03/2023 | HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 27 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
84.6 % | 05/2023 | Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 33 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
设备 - 从TB4到USB2.0的所有设备
与前代产品相比,在端口方面有许多相似之处,但幸运的是有一些刷新。仍然有一个USB 2.0端口,这对于鼠标或打印机来说应该还是足够的。迷你DP也得到了保留。
简单的USB-C接口已被移到后面,提供高达10Gbit/s的速率,但PD和DP都不支持。雷电4在右边,但不幸的是,不再有USB-A端口。此外,在当前版本中,卡槽已经缩减为microSD,这大大限制了其多功能性。
SD卡阅读器
我们用参考的AV PRO V60 microSD 128 GB卡的测量结果不是很平均,但部分地比竞争对手好一点。这足以让我们在几分钟内复制几千张照片。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
英特尔AX211的WLAN模块满足了人们的期望。然而,在我们的测量中,典型的平均速率只在6GHz网络中实现,甚至还略微超过了。在5GHz下的轻微弱点很可能是由邻近无线网络的干扰影响造成的,我们在测试中自然无法停用这些网络。
维护
相当大的变化,目的是为了 XMG Focus 172021年开始,对内部进行了大量修改。所有的冷却元件现在都是由铜制成的,空气可以向两边排放。用于2.5英寸固态硬盘的过时的SATA端口已经消失了。取而代之的是第二个M.2 NVMe SSD插槽。
正如申克公司所期望的那样,接触这些组件很容易。松开12个相同的螺丝后,可以不费吹灰之力从后部的冷却系统开始拉出底部。内存、固态硬盘、WLAN模块和电池都很容易接近和更换。
显示屏 - XMG游戏笔记本的色彩强烈,对比度小
XMG Focus 17的哑光IPS面板满足了人们对一款坚实但不突出的游戏笔记本的期望。QHD分辨率在17.3英寸的大对角线上发挥了自己的作用,此外,240赫兹的刷新率确保了低延迟,即使在游戏中没有达到帧率。
不太有说服力的是响应时间,它不是最佳的,超过10毫秒,但可以接受。糟糕的黑色水平阻碍了更好的对比度。在房间内照明极少的情况下,在非常黑暗的场景中可以看到灰色的雾气。我们测得的比率为623:1,这里的对比度只略低于Medion的一半。 Medion Erazer Defender P40或 HP Omen 17-ck.屏幕出血现象也很明显。
照度可以更均匀一些,320cd/m²的亮度也可以更高一些。因此,与许多类似价格的机型相比,显示率低于平均水平。
|
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 349 cd/m²
Contrast: 623:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.08
ΔE Greyscale 1.14 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) BOE09F9 NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Medion Erazer Major X20 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | HP Omen 17-ck2097ng BOE BOE09BF, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Medion Erazer Defender P40 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -14% | -15% | -16% | -17% | -16% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 96.6 | 70.4 -27% | 69.4 -28% | 69 -29% | 67.4 -30% | 68.3 -29% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.6 0% | 98 -2% | 99.8 0% | 97.6 -2% | 98.1 -2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.5 | 72.6 -14% | 70.9 -16% | 69.6 -18% | 69.6 -18% | 69.8 -17% |
Response Times | 37% | 26% | 39% | 12% | 15% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.4 ? | 7 ? 57% | 13.1 ? 20% | 10.8 ? 34% | 15.6 ? 5% | 14.6 ? 11% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10.8 ? | 9.1 ? 16% | 7.3 ? 32% | 6.1 ? 44% | 8.9 ? 18% | 8.7 ? 19% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 21% | -23% | 9% | -7% | 11% | |
Brightness middle | 349 | 355.3 2% | 374 7% | 415 19% | 371 6% | 364 4% |
Brightness | 318 | 340 7% | 357 12% | 399 25% | 350 10% | 343 8% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 91 11% | 92 12% | 90 10% | 90 10% | 86 5% |
Black Level * | 0.56 | 0.32 43% | 0.33 41% | 0.43 23% | 0.32 43% | 0.28 50% |
Contrast | 623 | 1110 78% | 1133 82% | 965 55% | 1159 86% | 1300 109% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.08 | 1.13 -5% | 2.43 -125% | 1.44 -33% | 1.74 -61% | 1.67 -55% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.05 | 2.78 9% | 3.97 -30% | 2.33 24% | 3.59 -18% | 2.78 9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.08 | 0.32 70% | 1.4 -30% | 0.89 18% | 1.01 6% | 1.14 -6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.14 | 1.4 -23% | 3.1 -172% | 1.8 -58% | 2.8 -146% | 1.4 -23% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.24 98% | 2.191 100% | 2.132 103% | 2.19 100% | 2.091 105% |
CCT | 6687 97% | 6372 102% | 6194 105% | 6327 103% | 6474 100% | 6568 99% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 15% /
16% | -4% /
-14% | 11% /
8% | -4% /
-7% | 3% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
色彩还原度非常好。用于游戏和大多数非专业应用的sRGB色彩空间基本上被完全覆盖。甚至DCI-P3也能在很大程度上得到体现。因此,色彩还原度高于平均水平。
在没有事先校准的情况下测得的低颜色偏差是非常显著的。即使确定的最大DeltaE略低于3,也意味着用肉眼无法检测到差异。因此,事后不必对显示器进行调整以获得最佳显示效果。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.6 ms rise | |
↘ 6.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.4 ms rise | |
↘ 9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17853 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
由于只有350cd/m²,户外可视性受到很大影响。在阴暗的地方仍然可以很好地识别颜色。然而,如果有更多的光线落在屏幕上,最多只能充分识别文字。这在阴天也是如此。
从不同的观察方向看,颜色的再现性是意料之中的好。IPS面板没有显示出任何颜色变化,亮度也几乎保持不变,即使是从一个尖锐的角度。
性能--用Focus 17进行稳固的游戏
尤其是强大的 Nvidia Geforce RTX 4070决定了Focus 17 E23的应用可能性。该GPU提供了大量的性能,配以足够的VRAM,适用于目前的标题,大多可以在原生QHD分辨率和几乎所有的细节上播放。这也应该适用于在不久的将来即将推出的游戏。
同时,良好的工作速度得到了保证,这要归功于 英特尔酷睿i9-13900HX.复杂的应用程序可以被快速处理。多任务处理甚至在很大程度上不构成问题。然而,在游戏笔记本中,CPU的性能充其量是次要的。
测试条件
在预装的ControlCenter中可以选择四种预定义的性能模式。我们总是使用 "性能模式 "进行测试和基准测试,这确保了最高的风扇速度和对GPU和CPU的最大电源供应。
在 "娱乐模式 "下,这些数值都是最小的弱点。只有CPU的性能在这里略有下降,所以对游戏的明显影响几乎是不可预期的。另一方面,"静音模式 "在很大程度上限制了系统性能,但噪音的发展逐渐消失在背景中,即使它没有完全消失。即使在这种模式下,要求不高的游戏仍然可以玩。其中,Witcher 3 ,在最高设置和全高清情况下达到60帧以上。
省电模式 "完全禁用了专用的图形芯片,根据目前的状况,至少在我们测试的系统上,要达到一半的可接受的电池运行时间,这是必须的。
处理器
共有32个线程和36MB三级缓存以及5.4GHz的最大时钟频率表明了这一点:该 英特尔酷睿i9-13900HX是目前最好的移动CPU之一。它最适合用于多任务和计算密集型应用,并使前辈的 英特尔酷睿i9-12900HX或 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX落后。
在XMG Focus 17中,CPU在零点几秒的时间内接受高达162 W的功率。至少可以在半分钟内输入135W。不幸的是,冷却系统不能完全应付高热量的发展。在Medion Erazer Major X20中,相同的处理器在最大性能上保持稳定。在Focus 17中,Cinebench R15测试的性能下降了20%以上。然而,惠普的Omen 17-ck2097ng中的i9甚至损失了30%,所以整体行为似乎可以接受。
当我们看 "娱乐模式 "时,该处理器有点超标的事实变得明显。虽然电源从135W降到55W,但风扇在这里也仍然很响。同时,我们没有测量到任何严重的性能下降,特别是在游戏中。这是因为从长远来看,CPU只有在这种功耗下才能充分稳定地运行。因此,电源模式只在短期负载中产生影响。
在安静和节能模式下只给予15W,在短期内给予30W。
更多的测量、比较数据和信息可以在我们的 CPU基准测试列表.
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24270 - 32623, n=22) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1867 - 2105, n=19) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=20) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=20) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=224, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=21) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (90675 - 127283, n=20) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6340 - 7177, n=20) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17614 - 21075, n=21) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1345 - 2093, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=21) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=20) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average of class Gaming | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
系统性能
许多处理器核心,大量快速访问的内存,以及快速的固态硬盘在各种情况下都能驱动系统。即使是在后台暂停的游戏,也只是减慢了一点速度。从打开视频编辑软件的大量多任务处理到无数的浏览器标签,几乎没有任何事情会导致Focus 17出现严重问题。
虽然它在拥有类似硬件的对手中相对落后,但它还是获得了一个比坚实的评级,承诺为苛刻的任务提供足够的性能。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (6956 - 8153, n=3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9865 - 11653, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9470 - 9850, n=3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9776 - 13370, n=3) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1842 - 2029, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1700 - 1872, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2088 - 2316, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1557 - 1752, n=3) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 |
PCMark 10 Score | 6956 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
具有相同CPU的其他游戏笔记本的性能比XMG Focus 17差很多。它没有达到最佳效果,但在大多数需要顺利进行的任务中,应该可以令人满意地工作。它甚至可以做得更好,但对于大多数用户来说,这应该只是次要的。
最大的困难是由来自Nvidia的显卡驱动引起的,希望将来能通过更新来改善。同样值得称道但绝不是常规的是4K视频的流畅播放没有掉帧。因此,目前的构建和驱动设备似乎是和谐的。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
安装的M.2固态硬盘Crucial P5 Plus并不是一个高级型号。然而,它通过PCIe 4.0实现了良好的传输速率,并在长期测试中保持非常稳定,这是由于在游戏笔记本电脑的底板上有额外的冷却。
因此,在加载、程序执行等过程中,不会出现大容量存储的阻碍或延迟。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
只有少数GPU比NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 ,它可以理所当然地将自己归入中上层。它提供4,608个着色器,144个用于Nvidia DLSS的张量核心,以及36个光线追踪核心。这足以满足苛刻的任务和最高细节水平的复杂游戏。只有8GB的VRAM有点紧张。然而,这应该只在连接4K显示器时才会造成问题。在屏幕原生QHD分辨率的个别随机测试中,在目前的游戏中从未占用超过7GB。
在Focus 17 E23中,允许图形芯片最大消耗140W,其中25W从处理器中分流出来作为动态提升。这相当于游戏笔记本中RTX 4070的典型设置。然而,我们进行的合成基准测试与预期有一定差距,因为高功耗无法长期保持。
在3DMark分数以及游戏中,Focus 17总是落后于几乎装备相同的Medion Erazer Major X20 或LenovoLegion Pro 5 ,而CPU则不同。显然,大型i9-13900HX 与相应的冷却要求在图形应用中也是阻碍而不是帮助。除了Legion Pro,华硕ROG Strix G18 ,配备RTX 4070 ,但较小的i7-13650HX ,可以作为一个例子提及,它实现了大约相同的性能率。
此外,性能模式似乎还不成熟。比较Time Spy 基准中的结果,性能和娱乐模式几乎是一样的。即使在我们测试的个别游戏中,测得的FPS的差距也很小。另一方面,静音模式,至少工作起来非常安静,下降得太明显。取得的2943分也是由AMD Radeon 780M ,一个集成图形芯片取得的。
更多的基准和性能数据可以在我们的GPU基准列表中找到 。
3DMark 11 Performance | 33424 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 58621 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25541 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 12339 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
我们测试的所有游戏都至少达到令人满意的帧率。在当前要求相当高的游戏中,在最高细节水平和QHD分辨率下,其速率仅低于60帧。因此,在相当长的一段时间内,该硬件应该足以应付未来的游戏。当你放弃一些细节并使用全高清分辨率时,大多数游戏都能以100帧或更高的速度播放。
XMG Focus 17在我们选定的具有相同GPU的游戏中,在有对比率的游戏中,排名在我们的对手之间。它也大致与配备RTX 3080 Ti的MSI Titan GT77 持平,后者在去年发布时价格约为两倍。采用前代GPU的游戏笔记本RTX 3070 ,根据型号不同,其性能可以超过10%。
由于CPU在游戏中的压力比许多其他基准测试中要小,所以有点弱的冷却并不那么重要。只有GPU需要耗费大量的热量,而处理器的性能可以节制,不会有明显的帧率损失。因此,XMG笔记本在游戏方面没有表现出任何弱点,尽管在全负荷下多出几个百分点似乎是现实的。
在其他方面,允许GPU消耗的最大可能的140W几乎从未达到。我们能够在压力测试的一个特殊场景中激起一个143W的测量峰值。否则,游戏中的平均功耗为100瓦,这再次远远低于图形芯片即使没有动态提升也应该消耗的115瓦。
一切都表明,冷却系统没有设法足够快地散去废热。Schenker XMG经常表明,笔记本风扇也可以长期处理图形芯片的最大功率消耗--例如见 XMG Neo 16 E23.
与Witcher 3 的耐力测试没有任何惊喜。这应该被理解为是完全积极的。无法观察到性能下降或持续节流。典型的波动可以用游戏中一天中的时间变化来解释。相应地,在其他游戏中,随着时间的推移,不应该观察到帧率下降的情况。
在游戏的耐力测试中,我们可以再次检查娱乐和性能模式的表现。在娱乐模式下,系统需要的功率几乎减少了20W,而GPU的时钟频率比性能模式下要高。CPU的行为似乎更有规律,通常时钟速率(绿色)也比性能模式略高。由于功耗更低,噪音发展略低,我们还测量了相同的帧率。
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
GTA V (2015) | 180.8 | 117.4 | 88.5 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 226 | 115 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 177.3 | 164.5 | |||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 114.8 | 81.3 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 123 | ||||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 145 | 136 | 112 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 247 | 211 | 135.2 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 100.7 | 102.3 | 63.9 | ||
F1 22 (2022) | 211 | 77.8 | 49 | ||
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 86 | 71 | 50 | ||
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) | 79 | 73 | 45 |
排放 - Focus 17可以很安静
噪声排放
Focus 17是其行业中最响亮的代表之一。即使隔着一扇紧闭的门,它也能清楚地听到约58分贝的声音。然而Medion Erazer Defender P40证明了它可以变得更响。尽管图形芯片较小,但它显然达到了60分贝以上。
在远离永久负载的笔记本电脑的正常使用过程中,风扇的转速很显眼。冷却的启动没有明显的原因。几秒钟后,速度再次降低。另一方面,在游戏过程中速度保持不变,所以可以听到永久的噪音,但没有恼人的速度变化。
我们测得在娱乐模式下,Witcher 3 ,少了几个分贝,这是很容易察觉的。顺便说一下,帧数保持不变。在 "静音模式 "下,可以测量到少了15分贝,感觉是原来音量的三分之一。在这种情况下,笔记本是可以听到的,但即使在安静的环境中也不会造成干扰。在Witcher 3 ,我们仍然测得帧率略低于一半。在最高的细节设置下,游戏仍然可以以60帧的速度播放,这可能是许多要求不高或稍旧的游戏的真实情况,然后也可以像耳语一样安静地播放。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 26.47 dB(A) |
Load |
| 55.72 / 57.94 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Medion Erazer Defender P40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 11% | -3% | -8% | -5% | -7% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 23.2 3% | 24 -0% | 26 -8% | 24 -0% | 25 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 23.2 3% | 25 -4% | 26 -8% | 31 -29% | 26 -8% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 23.2 3% | 29 -21% | 29 -21% | 32 -33% | 27 -13% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.47 | 26.2 1% | 31 -17% | 40 -51% | 33 -25% | 32 -21% |
Load Average * | 55.72 | 31.4 44% | 50 10% | 47 16% | 45 19% | 53 5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 57.94 | 48.4 16% | 53 9% | 52 10% | 45 22% | 56 3% |
Load Maximum * | 57.94 | 53.8 7% | 57 2% | 54 7% | 50 14% | 64 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
掌托是温暖的,但绝不是热的(我们测得的最高温度为36℃)。然而,关键区域的温度已经达到42°C,而中间右侧的温度仍然是40°C。在左边,游戏笔记本保持了一点温度。这可能是令人讨厌的,特别是在打字和游戏的温暖日子里。
即使没有明显的负载,底部也会变热,所以XMG Focus 17 E23应该只在平坦的硬表面上使用。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 20% | 4% | 9% | 23% | 19% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 41.8 16% | 46 8% | 49 2% | 41 18% | 42 16% |
Maximum Bottom * | 56 | 41.4 26% | 49 12% | 52 7% | 51 9% | 45 20% |
Idle Upper Side * | 37 | 29 22% | 37 -0% | 30 19% | 24 35% | 28 24% |
Idle Bottom * | 36 | 30.4 16% | 38 -6% | 33 8% | 25 31% | 30 17% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在我们用Prime95和Furmark进行的压力测试中,CPU的温度达到了95℃以上。另一方面,GPU没有被完全利用,在60至75℃之间徘徊。在这种极端情况下,电源是有限的,GPU和CPU加起来大约是200W,而240W理论上是可能的。此外,这种情况只持续过几秒钟,然后电源和时钟速率就会明显降低。
冷却系统不能永久地保持最大的性能,例如,在 XMG Neo 16 E23就是这种情况。
演讲者
对于一台笔记本来说,声音的再现是足够强大的。没有什么可抱怨的,特别是在低频和高音部分。语音和重度动作游戏中的典型效果再现良好。
在音乐或甚至电影中,也可以听到缺乏音质和中低频和高低音的声音,这在我们的测量中是很明显的。对于这些任务,几乎没有办法绕过使用外部扬声器或耳机。
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.08 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理--游戏笔记本的强大CPU是非常饥饿的
消耗功率
在没有进程运行的情况下,耗电量显然太高。特别是那些采用AMD处理器的对手,如 XMG Neo 17 M22则可以用不到一半的功率。
Focus 17在负载下也不节俭。在Witcher 3 ,要达到相同的帧率,它需要比XMG Neo 17 M22多三分之一的功率。 联想Legion Pro 5.这并不高效,在很大程度上解释了为什么Legion 的声音只有一半。
280瓦的电源至少是足够大的,从未过载,而且应该总是提供足够的电力为电池充电。
Off / Standby | 0.05 / 1.5 Watt |
Idle | 17 / 18 / 25.8 Watt |
Load |
178 / 275 Watt |
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 17% | 31% | 5% | 31% | -29% | 21% | 10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 17 | 8.1 52% | 7 59% | 16 6% | 8 53% | 30.21 -78% | 12.1 ? 29% | 13.9 ? 18% |
Idle Average * | 18 | 15.9 12% | 11 39% | 20 -11% | 12 33% | 32.42 -80% | 16.9 ? 6% | 19.2 ? -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.8 | 37.2 -44% | 17 34% | 26 -1% | 18 30% | 33.7 -31% | 24.1 ? 7% | 27.1 ? -5% |
Load Average * | 178 | 90.9 49% | 92 48% | 135 24% | 101 43% | 125.09 30% | 99.5 ? 44% | 111.6 ? 37% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 265 | 189.6 28% | 221 17% | 215 19% | 180.8 32% | 256 3% | ||
Load Maximum * | 275 | 263.5 4% | 306 -11% | 299 -9% | 284 -3% | 321.88 -17% | 220 ? 20% | 251 ? 9% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption external monitor
电池寿命
无负载时的高耗电量伴随着电池运行时间的减弱。即使在节能模式下,也无法达到4小时。在静音模式下,还能再实现20分钟,考虑到激活的DGPU,这是不可能的。如果在性能模式下拔掉插头,并激活高级优化功能,在我们的WLAN测试中,运行时间甚至不到2小时,而且还能交替进行互联网通话。
XMG在这方面报告说,节能模式目前不能如愿。从我们的测试结果来看,我们可以证实这一点。一个更新肯定会纠正这种情况。
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 62.3 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 3% | 17% | 121% | 5% | 70% | 66% | |
H.264 | 188 | 252 34% | 398 112% | 220 17% | 339 80% | 397 ? 111% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 233 | 240 3% | 232 0% | 537 130% | 217 -7% | 373 60% | 366 ? 57% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 62 | 80.6 ? 30% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 最适合游戏,有一些缺点
该系统的性能是毋庸置疑的。Focus 17在类似的强大竞争中名列前茅。只有不太有说服力的冷却系统阻止了更好的得分。它似乎没有为英特尔酷睿i9进行精确的调整,特别是。然而,目前可能没有任何游戏对色彩准确的QHD分辨率的屏幕要求过高。
专注于游戏性能:在Focus 17 E23中发现了强大的硬件,其设备低于平均水平。
如果笔记本电脑不需要有更多的能力,XMG焦点与专注于游戏性能,这已经在名称中预测。否则,与(几乎普遍更昂贵的)竞争对手相比,评级结果相当弱。
键盘只提供了几种颜色设置,总是针对所有按键。与前代产品一样,触摸板不能令人信服,但无论如何它几乎不会被用于游戏。电池寿命太短,在严格的节能模式下只能接受一半。扬声器的声音很平庸。此外,通风装置的声音比平均水平要大,而组件的耗电量对于确定的性能来说太大。此外,USB2.0似乎不再是最新的,例如,Mini-DisplayPort可以在VR头盔上找到,但支持DP的USB-C会更有变化。
作为回报,定价也相应地具有吸引力。性价比很高。如果Schenker也能成功地通过软件更新调整看似未完成的性能模式,那么一些缺陷,如电池寿命短或风扇行为差,就可以大大缓解。
从类似的组件中可以获得更多的性能,例如,有 XMG Neo 16 E23(配备RTX 4090)。与XMG Focus 17相比,速度差不多,而且更安静的是 联想Legion Pro 5 16 Gen8.然而,这两款游戏笔记本在整体设备较好的情况下,价格也明显更高。
价格和可用性
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23)
-
06/04/2023 v7
Mario Petzold
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.