Medion Erazer Major X20回顾:配备RTX 4070和坚实硬件的游戏笔记本
Medion Erazer Major X20主要是一款游戏笔记本,但也是为其他计算密集型应用场景而生。与它的前辈相比相比,X20得到了一些有用的升级:Arc A730M。 弧形A730M图形核心已经让位给明显更强大的 GeForce RTX 4070.此外,机械键盘取代了Chiclet模型,而两个USB-C端口(USB 3.2 Gen 2)中的一个已经被移除,剩下的一个已经升级为雷电4端口。
X20基于同方裸机(GM6PX7X),与XMG Neo 16的已知型号基本相似,但缺少水冷接口。竞争者包括笔记本电脑,如 Aorus 15X ASF,以及 Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 22)和 华硕ROG Strix G17 G713PI.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89 % | 04/2023 | Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 29 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.2 % | 04/2023 | Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 19.7 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
89.9 % | 03/2023 | Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
88.4 % | 04/2023 | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 30.7 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
箱子--为Medion笔记本电脑提供一个隐蔽的外部。
Medion采用了别致、素雅的机箱,即使在专业环境中也不显眼。哑光黑色机箱的盖子背面由铝制成,基本单元由塑料制成。一个防滑橡胶涂层覆盖在基本单元的上侧。除了按键背光(RGB)外,后部通风口内的两个可自由配置的LED灯条(RGB)和盖子上的Erazer标志的照明,使这个看起来很严肃的箱子变得轻松起来。
这款16英寸的机箱没有暴露出任何制造上的缺陷。缝隙尺寸均匀,没有材料突起。底座只能轻微扭转,盖子更明显,但整个设备都在合理范围内。电池(用螺丝固定,不是用胶水)和其他内部组件在拆下底壳后可以接触到。铰链使盖子牢牢固定在位置上,最大打开角度约为130度。单手打开盖子是可能的。
在比较领域,Medion笔记本电脑是具有最厚的结构的设备之一。就重量而言,它处于中间位置。
设备 - Major X20提供Thunderbolt 4
Erazer有三个USB-A端口(1个USB 3.2 Gen 1,2个USB 3.2 Gen 2)和一个USB-C端口(Thunderbolt 4)。后者输出DisplayPort信号,但不提供任何Power Delivery支持。Major X20还拥有总共两个视频输出(HDMI 2.1,DP)。进一步的连接包括一个电缆锁的插槽,两个音频插孔和一个千兆以太网端口(2.5Gbps)。
视频输出、电源插槽和网络端口都位于设备的背面。因此,相应的电缆从后面走,不会碍事。
SD卡阅读器
microSD存储卡读卡器(参考卡:AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)属于中等速度的型号,最大传输速率为78 MB/s(传输250个jpg图像文件,每个约5 MB)和88 MB/s(复制大数据块)。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
沟通
在最佳条件下(附近没有WLAN设备,笔记本电脑和服务器PC之间的距离很小),WiFi数据率非常好。X20板上有一个WiFi 6E芯片(Intel AX211)。有线连接由Realtek的芯片(RTL8125;2.5 GBit/s)处理。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头(210万像素,最大1,920 x 1,080)提供标准质量。色彩精度不足:在色彩偏差约为11的情况下,目标(DeltaE小于3)被错过。机上没有机械快门。
辅料
除了通常的文件(快速入门指南和保修信息)外,笔记本没有包含其他附件。
维护
在卸下设备底部的所有螺丝后,可以用平铲或关节平滑器将底壳拆开。然后你可以接触到两个内存插槽(都被占用),两个固态硬盘(PCIe 4,M.2-2280),WLAN模块,风扇,BIOS电池和笔记本电池。
担保
Medion在德国为Erazer提供两年的保修。这在其他国家可能有所不同,所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。
保修期可以延长,但必须在Medion的网上商店与笔记本一起购买。后续购买是不可能的。
输入设备 - 带Cherry MX开关的机械键盘
键盘
Medion在X20中安装了一个机械键盘,而不是Chiclet键盘。Cherry MX开关的行程适中,有一个清晰可闻的压力点。用户可以享受到丰富的打字感觉和精确的反馈,而且键盘在打字过程中不会屈服。两个功能键可以调节四段式独立按键照明(RGB)的亮度。总的来说,我们可以说这是一个坚实的键盘。
触摸板
一个具有多点触摸功能的点击板(约11.6 x 7.2厘米)可作为鼠标的替代品。其光滑的表面使手指容易滑动。它提供短程和清晰的压力点。用手指点一下左上角的LED,就可以打开或关闭整个垫子。
显示屏 - QHD+,16:10格式
Medion安装了一个支持G-Sync的240 Hz面板。后者可以动态地调整显示器和GPU的刷新率,以创造尽可能平滑的画质--尤其是在游戏时。
PWM闪烁在任何亮度设置下都不存在。雾面16英寸面板(2560x1600)的亮度和对比度在适合工作的16:10格式中达到了相应的目标(>300 cd/m²或1000:1)。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 374 cd/m²
Contrast: 1133:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.191
Medion Erazer Major X20 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Aorus 15X ASF BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI BOE0B69, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | 25% | 22% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69.4 | 69.3 0% | 97.6 41% | 98.3 42% |
sRGB Coverage | 98 | 98.2 0% | 99.4 1% | 100 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.9 | 70.5 -1% | 94 33% | 85.9 21% |
Response Times | -12% | 79% | 21% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13.1 ? | 12.4 ? 5% | 2 ? 85% | 5.3 ? 60% |
Response Time Black / White * | 7.3 ? | 9.4 ? -29% | 2 ? 73% | 8.6 ? -18% |
PWM Frequency | 500 ? | |||
Screen | 14% | 126% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 374 | 316 -16% | 383 2% | 327 -13% |
Brightness | 357 | 301 -16% | 384 8% | 320 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 90 -2% | 99 8% | 89 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.28 15% | 0.03 91% | 0.38 -15% |
Contrast | 1133 | 1129 0% | 12767 1027% | 861 -24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.43 | 1.54 37% | 1.89 22% | 1.01 58% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.97 | 2.46 38% | 3.76 5% | 4.01 -1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.4 | 1.21 14% | 2.67 -91% | 0.41 71% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 1.3 58% | 1.26 59% | 1.6 48% |
Gamma | 2.191 100% | 2.307 95% | 2.41 91% | 2.168 101% |
CCT | 6194 105% | 6456 101% | 6386 102% | 6659 98% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
7% | 77% /
97% | 18% /
16% |
* ... smaller is better
屏幕在交付状态下产生良好的色彩表现:达到目标(DeltaE<3)时,偏差约为2.4。手动校准将偏差降低到1.4,并确保更平衡的灰度。
该面板完全覆盖了sRGB色彩空间,但没有覆盖AdobeRGB和DCI-P3色彩空间。如果需要所有三种色彩空间,则没有办法绕过刀锋15的OLED屏幕。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.1 ms rise | |
↘ 4.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
13.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 7.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
视角稳定的IPS面板可以从任何位置阅读。如果阳光不太强烈,在户外阅读屏幕是可能的。
性能 - Raptor Lake和Ada Lovelace为游戏笔记本提供动力
游戏、渲染和一般所有性能要求高的应用领域都算在Erazer Major X20的应用场景中。Raptor Lake和Ada Lovelace提供了必要的计算能力。该模型的价格约为2500欧元(约合2500美元)。
测试条件
X20提供三种制造商特定的电源模式(见表),你可以通过一个单独的按钮(在电源按钮旁边)来选择。一个状态LED显示哪种模式处于活动状态。使用了 "涡轮模式"(基准测试)和 "办公模式"(电池测试)。Optimus是激活的。
可以使用预装的控制中心软件创建个人配置文件。例如,可以调整CPU的功率限制、GPU的TGP和/或温度上限。
我们使用CC软件的英语界面,因为德语翻译部分不成功。你可以在两种语言之间切换。
涡轮模式 (dt: Overboost) | 平衡模式 (dt: Balanced) | 办公室模式 (dt: Balanced) | |
---|---|---|---|
CPU PL1 (HWInfo) | 140 watts | 140 watts | 140 watts |
CPU PL2 (HWInfo) | 140 watts | 140 watts | 140 watts |
噪音 (Witcher 3) | 50-53 dB(A) | 48-51 dB(A) | 36-43 dB(A), 后来32-34 dB(A) |
性能 (Witcher 3) | 124 fps | 118 fps | 114-118 fps, 以后为30 fps锁定 |
处理器
芯片 酷睿-i9-13900HX处理器(Raptor Lake)由八个性能核心(超线程,2.2至5.4 GHz)和十六个效率核心(无超线程,1.6至3.9 GHz)组成。总共有32个逻辑CPU核心。基准测试结果与CPU的平均速率持平。
Cinebench R15基准的CPU测试是在主电源运行的高至最高时钟速率下进行的。与日常使用相关的单线程性能(222分),在电池模式下的下降幅度明显小于多线程性能(1025分)。
CB15循环测试显示,在主电源运行的多线程负载下,持续保持高涡轮增压时钟。在测试过程中,时钟速率只下降了很小的幅度。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
系统性能
运行平稳的系统并不缺乏计算能力。笔记本电脑处理游戏、渲染和视频编辑没有问题,良好的PCMark结果证实了这一点。对于DDR5-4800内存来说,内存的传输率处于正常水平。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (6956 - 8153, n=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15X ASF |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9865 - 11653, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9470 - 9850, n=3) | |
Aorus 15X ASF |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9776 - 13370, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1842 - 2029, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1700 - 1872, n=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2088 - 2316, n=3) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1557 - 1752, n=3) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4889 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6067 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7575 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15X ASF |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21) | |
Aorus 15X ASF |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
标准化的延迟监测测试(网络冲浪、4k视频播放、Prime95高负荷)发现了一些异常情况。该系统似乎不适合实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能会改善这一点,或导致进一步恶化。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Erazer装有两块来自Phison的1TB固态硬盘(PCIe 4,M.2-2280),总体上提供了良好的性能率。固态硬盘没有形成RAID阵列,X20也没有提供RAID支持--一个固态硬盘作为系统驱动器,另一个作为数据存储。一个积极的方面是:没有观察到热节流现象。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
没有(更多)实验:当Medion将英特尔当时新推出的Arc GPU中的一个安装到主要的X10,而X20则配备了一个 GeForce RTX 4070笔记本卡(VRAM:8,192 GB GDDR6),来自Nvidia。这款产品的最大可能TGP为140瓦(115瓦+25瓦动态提升),根据Witcher 3 测试,这款产品没有得到充分利用。
基准测试结果高于之前RTX 4070的平均水平--与Arc A730M相比,性能有显著提高。弧形A730MdGPU模式并没有带来任何改进。在dGPU和Optimus之间切换不需要重启 - 支持高级Optimus。
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 60496 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 35727 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 66380 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 27130 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 12846 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
这款笔记本允许在高至最高设置下进行QHD游戏。在使用外部显示器时,更高的分辨率是可能的--可能是降低设置。测试的标题的帧率高于确定的RTX 4070平均水平。dGPU模式可能会在小范围内增加一些游戏的帧率。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=49) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Medion Erazer Major X10 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (63.5 - 137.6, n=42) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=218, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X10 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (66 - 131, n=45) | |
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Medion Erazer Major X10 |
为了检查帧率是否在较长时间内基本保持不变,我们在全高清分辨率和最高质量设置下运行游戏 "TheWitcher 3" 约60分钟。游戏角色没有被移动。帧率的下降并没有被记录下来。
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
GTA V (2015) | 187.3 | 187.2 | 183.8 | 128 | 72.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 545 | 391.4 | 242.3 | 127 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 205 | 183.3 | 169.9 | 158.8 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 220 | 175.2 | 121.2 | 88.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 182.3 | 155.9 | 120.8 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 188 | 161 | 153 | 144 | 122 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 490 | 310 | 244 | 208 | 131.4 |
F1 22 (2022) | 262 | 264 | 206 | 83.9 | 53.3 |
排放物 - Erazer笔记本电脑会产生大量的噪音
噪声
X20在负载下会产生很大的噪音:当 "涡轮模式 "激活时,峰值可达57 dB(A)。背景噪音是类似于嘶嘶声的东西。风扇没有发出令人讨厌的背景噪音。通过使用其他两个性能配置,可以实现整体较低的噪音水平--以牺牲计算能力为代价。
在怠速和日常使用中(办公室、互联网)的排放是令人愉快的:风扇以非常低的速度运行,并且经常处于空闲状态--在所有三个性能配置中。
涡轮模式 (dt: Overboost) | 平衡模式 (dt: Balanced) | 办公室模式 (dt: Balanced) | |
---|---|---|---|
CPU PL1 (HWInfo) | 140 watts | 140 watts | 140 watts |
CPU PL2 (HWInfo) | 140 watts | 140 watts | 140 watts |
噪音 (Witcher 3) | 50-53 dB(A) | 48-51 dB(A) | 36-43 dB(A) 以后 32-34 dB(A) |
性能 (Witcher 3) | 124 fps | 118 fps | 114-118 fps later 30 fps Lock |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25 / 29 / 31 dB(A) |
Load |
| 50 / 57 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -5% | 7% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 25 -4% | 26 -8% | 25 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 28 -12% | 28 -12% | 26 -4% |
Idle Average * | 29 | 29 -0% | 28 3% | 29 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 36 -16% | 28 10% | 30 3% |
Load Average * | 50 | 50 -0% | 38.5 23% | 46 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 53 | 54 -2% | 46 13% | |
Load Maximum * | 57 | 58 -2% | 43.9 23% | 47 18% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在日常使用中(办公室、互联网),笔记本温度保持在绿色范围内。笔记本在负载下明显发热(压力测试,Witcher 3 测试),但不会过度。CPU的温度没有什么可担心的。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 16% | 3% | 12% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 46 | 42 9% | 49.5 -8% | 42 9% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49 | 51 -4% | 47.5 3% | 41 16% |
Idle Upper Side * | 37 | 27 27% | 33.4 10% | 33 11% |
Idle Bottom * | 38 | 26 32% | 35 8% | 34 11% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
压力测试(Prime95和Furmark连续运行)代表了测试系统在全负荷下稳定性的极端情况。CPU以高时钟频率开始测试(P:4 GHz,E:3.3 GHz),而GPU以1.5至2 GHz的速度启动。在最初的5分钟内,CPU时钟逐渐下降到2至2.4 GHz(P核)和1.9至2.1 GHz(E核)。同时,GPU时钟增加到2.3至2.4GHz。
发言人
立体声扬声器产生非常体面的声音,但可以使用更多的低音。建议使用耳机或外部扬声器以获得更好的音质。
Medion Erazer Major X20 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Aorus 15X ASF audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - Medion X20的运行时间很短
消耗功率
Medion笔记本在能源消耗方面没有显示任何异常。对于所安装的硬件来说,这些比率处于正常水平。Witcher 3 测试和压力测试以相对稳定的耗电率运行。因此,电源(330瓦)的大小是足够的。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
Idle | 12 / 16 / 26 Watt |
Load |
115 / 319 Watt |
Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 7% | -46% | -6% | 9% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 12 | 11 8% | 31.6 -163% | 15 -25% | 12.1 ? -1% | 13.8 ? -15% |
Idle Average * | 16 | 16 -0% | 33.3 -108% | 20 -25% | 16.9 ? -6% | 19.2 ? -20% |
Idle Maximum * | 26 | 24 8% | 38.6 -48% | 29 -12% | 24.1 ? 7% | 27 ? -4% |
Load Average * | 115 | 104 10% | 149 -30% | 121 -5% | 99 ? 14% | 111.3 ? 3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 191.6 | 185.4 3% | 149.6 22% | 179.8 6% | ||
Load Maximum * | 319 | 272 15% | 160 50% | 246 23% | 220 ? 31% | 251 ? 21% |
* ... smaller is better
Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
在WLAN测试中,这台16英寸笔记本的运行时间分别为3:52小时和4:12小时(使用脚本加载网站)和视频测试(短片Big Buck Bunny,H.264编码,FHD,循环进行)。在这两项测试中,笔记本的节能功能被停用,显示亮度被设置为150cd/m²左右。在视频测试中,无线电模块也被停用了。
总体上低于平均水平的运行时间是由于游戏笔记本的电池容量低(62.3Wh)。如果使用前代产品的80Wh电池,可能会有更多的时间。 前代产品的80瓦特电池可以实现更多。.
Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 62.3 Wh | Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 80% | 26% | -21% | 41% | |
Reader / Idle | 345 | 679 97% | 404 17% | 544 ? 58% | |
H.264 | 252 | 472 87% | 352 40% | 166 -34% | 399 ? 58% |
WiFi v1.3 | 232 | 489 111% | 274 18% | 255 10% | 368 ? 59% |
Load | 96 | 118 23% | 125 30% | 58 -40% | 84.2 ? -12% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 64 | 80.6 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决:大量的设备
这款强大的笔记本能够实现QHD+游戏,但在其他方面也很出色。A 酷睿i9-13900HX和一个 GeForce RTX 4070在持续的高时钟速率下运行,两个1TB的固态硬盘确保短的加载时间和足够的存储空间。噪声和热量发展在高范围内,是这种笔记本级别的典型。
在Erazer Major X20中,Medion展示了一个装备精良的中端游戏笔记本,没有任何严重的弱点。
前一个型号的chiclet键盘已经让位给机械模型(Cherry MX开关,RGB独立按键照明)--这是一个重大的改进。不熟悉这种键盘的用户将发现一种新的打字体验。
哑光的16英寸屏幕(QHD+,IPS,240赫兹,G-Sync,sRGB)采用适合工作的16:10格式,总体上给人以良好的印象。一个Thunderbolt 4端口确保了扩展选项(外部GPU、扩展坞解决方案、显示器),但不支持Power Delivery。电池运行时间也不令人印象深刻。
这款 Aorus 15X ASF是一个替代品,其运行时间明显更好。它提供与X20相同的图形性能,但CPU功率较小。
价格和可用性
Medion Erazer Major X20的审查配置在Medion的网上商店上市,价格略低于2,500欧元,但目前已售罄。目前,该机型在德国以外地区的供应似乎有限。
Medion Erazer Major X20
-
04/20/2023 v7
Sascha Mölck
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.