惠普 Pavilion 15 Power (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050) 笔记本电脑简短评测
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV (Pavilion 15-cx Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1354 MHz, RAM: 7008 MHz, GDDR5, 382.53, Optimus
Memory
16 GB
, DDR4, 1300 MHz, Dual-Channel, 15-15-15-36
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM175
Storage
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, 256 GB
, Secondary: 1 TB HGST HTS721010A9E630
Weight
2.358 kg, Power Supply: 431 g
Price
1000 USD
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 270.5 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 242.5 cd/m² Minimum: 17.58 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 256.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1351:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
57.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.03% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
57.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
38.81% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
CCT: 6599 K
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Chi Mei CMN N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S BOE CQ NV156HFM-N42, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 63% | 4% | 22% | -2% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 38.81 | 65 67% | 40.56 5% | 47.11 21% | 38.03 -2% | |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 57.9 | 90.8 57% | 59.4 3% | 70.4 22% | 56.5 -2% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 40.03 | 65.8 64% | 41.9 5% | 48.71 22% | 39.29 -2% | |
| Response Times | 15% | -41% | -20% | -10% | -6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 38.8 ? | 29.6 ? 24% | 58.8 ? -52% | 46 ? -19% | 38.8 ? -0% | 44.4 ? -14% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 28 ? | 26.4 ? 6% | 36 ? -29% | 34 ? -21% | 33.6 ? -20% | 27.2 ? 3% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 25510 ? | 21550 ? | 20000 ? | 19230 ? | ||
| Screen | 2% | -29% | 2% | -28% | -31% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 256.6 | 300.9 17% | 239 -7% | 277 8% | 255.9 0% | 209.7 -18% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 243 | 285 17% | 244 0% | 268 10% | 249 2% | 193 -21% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 81 | 92 14% | 88 9% | 91 12% | 90 11% | 75 -7% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.19 | 0.24 -26% | 0.35 -84% | 0.26 -37% | 0.48 -153% | 0.19 -0% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1351 | 1254 -7% | 683 -49% | 1065 -21% | 533 -61% | 1104 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5 | 5 -0% | 7.3 -46% | 5.05 -1% | 5.9 -18% | 7.8 -56% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.1 | 10.2 49% | 24.7 -23% | 8.93 56% | 18.9 6% | 24.1 -20% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 7 -159% | 4.9 -81% | 2.97 -10% | 5.6 -107% | 7.3 -170% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.34 94% | 2.19 100% | 2.39 92% | 2.21 100% | 2.39 92% |
| CCT | 6599 98% | 6578 99% | 7332 89% | 6466 101% | 7250 90% | 5771 113% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 36.7 | 59 61% | 35 -5% | 38 4% | 44.8 22% | 39.3 7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 57.7 | 90 56% | 55 -5% | 59 2% | 70.1 21% | 56.5 -2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 27% /
16% | -35% /
-31% | -5% /
-0% | -5% /
-15% | -13% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
| MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4042 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5328 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4964 points | |
Help | ||
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S Hynix HFS128G39TND | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -103% | 289% | 1% | 145% | |
| Copy Game MB/s (MB/s) | 204.3 | 1115 446% | 157.6 -23% | 240.5 18% | |
| Copy Program MB/s (MB/s) | 176.6 | 502 184% | 111.1 -37% | 299.5 70% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s (MB/s) | 297.3 | 1912 543% | 195 -34% | 1560 425% | |
| Score Total (Points) | 828 | 942 14% | 2617 216% | 882 7% | 1592 92% |
| Score Write (Points) | 210 | 48 -77% | 807 284% | 218 4% | 376 79% |
| Score Read (Points) | 416 | 646 55% | 1232 196% | 444 7% | 852 105% |
| Access Time Write * (ms) | 0.252 | 4.15 -1547% | 0.027 89% | 0.261 -4% | 0.031 88% |
| Access Time Read * (ms) | 0.12 | 0.08 33% | 0.065 46% | 0.077 36% | 0.066 45% |
| 4K-64 Write (MB/s) | 130.7 | 15.3 -88% | 529 305% | 113.9 -13% | 176.4 35% |
| 4K-64 Read (MB/s) | 338.8 | 371.6 10% | 919 171% | 361.4 7% | 564 66% |
| 4K Write (MB/s) | 66.5 | 1.2 -98% | 139.4 110% | 90.8 37% | 124.1 87% |
| 4K Read (MB/s) | 25.83 | 47.1 82% | 48.57 88% | 32.29 25% | 44.75 73% |
| Seq Write (MB/s) | 132.3 | 311.7 136% | 1392 952% | 130.2 -2% | 752 468% |
| Seq Read (MB/s) | 509 | 2277 347% | 2649 420% | 507 0% | 2433 378% |
* ... smaller is better
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Sequential Read:
491.6 MB/s
Sequential Write:
141.7 MB/s
512K Read:
345.6 MB/s
512K Write:
142.6 MB/s
4K Read:
18.83 MB/s
4K Write:
76.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
348.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
104.8 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7467 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 114747 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20367 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5451 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2630 points | |
Help | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Aorus x3 Plus v7 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
| MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
| Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 2GB | |
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV | |
| Asus N752VX-GC131T | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guild Wars 2 (2012) | 43.3 | |||
| StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) | 114 | |||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 63.1 | |||
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 78.9 | 43.6 | ||
| Thief (2014) | 73.8 | 41.4 | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 69 | 40.2 | 21 | |
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 89 | 78 | 44 | |
| Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 60 | 60 | 60 | 48.2 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 94.9 | |||
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 41.8 | 33.7 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 38.4 | 32.9 | ||
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 54.3 | 38.7 | 33.8 | |
| Doom (2016) | 103.6 | 81.5 | 38.4 | 35.3 |
| Overwatch (2016) | 92.2 | 55.5 | ||
| Mafia 3 (2016) | 40.6 | 27.8 | ||
| Prey (2017) | 144 | 83.3 | 60.7 | 49.9 |
The Witcher 3 high
Noise level
| Idle |
| 32.1 / 32.2 / 32.2 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43.3 / 49.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 27.8 dB(A) | ||
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | HP Pavilion 15t-bc200 X7P44AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 9% | 7% | 3% | 1% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 27.8 | 28.2 -1% | 27.7 -0% | 28.1 -1% | 28.9 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 32.1 | 28.2 12% | 30.5 5% | 28.1 12% | 32.3 -1% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 32.2 | 28.2 12% | 30.5 5% | 29.1 10% | 32.3 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 32.2 | 28.2 12% | 30.6 5% | 29.1 10% | 32.3 -0% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 43.3 | 39 10% | 40 8% | 49.2 -14% | 43.2 -0% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 45 | 40 11% | |||
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 49.6 | 46.3 7% | 42.6 14% | 49.2 1% | 45.2 9% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-12.3 °C / -22.1 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-12.3 °C / -22.1 F).
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.05 / 0.54 Watt |
| Idle | 9.4 / 9.7 / 16.8 Watt |
| Load |
76.5 / 105.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | 4% | -30% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 9.4 | 6.7 29% | 8.5 10% | 11.1 -18% | 5.3 44% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 9.7 | 8.9 8% | 9.1 6% | 14.1 -45% | 10.6 -9% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 16.8 | 10.8 36% | 9.7 42% | 18.4 -10% | 11.8 30% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 76.5 | 81.8 -7% | 79.9 -4% | 96.5 -26% | 70.9 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 86.5 | 92.2 -7% | 97.7 -13% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 105.6 | 122.7 -16% | 121.5 -15% | 159.5 -51% | 119.8 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 70 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 720-15IKB-80X7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 72 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh | Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 43 Wh | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 63.3 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 0% | -51% | -31% | -37% | -5% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 16.2 | 17.8 10% | 8.5 -48% | 10.2 -37% | 16 -1% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 8 | 8.1 1% | 4 -50% | 5.5 -31% | 4.4 -45% | 6.5 -19% |
| Load (h) | 1.8 | 1.6 -11% | 0.8 -56% | 1.3 -28% | 1.9 6% |
Pros
+ 可选AMD RX 550和GTX 1050显卡
+ 双内部存储隔间；支持NVMe
+ 可选1080p触摸屏和4K 超高清屏
+ 更强的机身；设计改进
+ 强大的游戏性能
+ 没有处理器节流
+ 可观的电池续航
Cons
- 表面温度不均匀；掌托微热
- 盖子可能更坚固；稍微地摇晃
- 系统风扇始终活跃；下载时有噪声
- 没有雷电3或DisplayPort 接口
- 不起眼的内部扬声器
- 难以维护
- 有限的颜色空间
- 过软的触控板
与标准版Pavilion 15相比，Pavilion 15 Power是更强大，更易于被推荐的笔记本电脑。前提是选配HQ级处理器和Pascal图形处理器。机身外壳是一个重要的更新点，打字感觉更舒适。屏幕背光更亮方便获得更好的体验。买家也应该意识到平庸的显示能力，更低的可维护性和有限的sRGB覆盖率，使该设备不利于图形编辑工作。
Pavilion 15 Power的主要问题在于售价。作为15寸笔记本电脑的XPS 15 9560仍然会是它的竞争对手，假如它们都有着类似的配置 （7700HQ, GTX 1050, FHD. 1 TB 机械硬盘, 8 GB 运行内存），XPS 15的售价会是1200美元，Pavilion 在 HP.com上的售价则是1040美元（或者920美元；Cukusa.com）。 而这200到300美元的差价，使得，戴尔的XPS更具便携性，拓展性，显示质量，可维护性和外壳坚硬度。平时，Pavilion运行起来会有点烫、有点吵。但瑕不掩瑜。如果您的预算有限，那么毫无疑问，旧版本的 Pavilion 15t 会是更好的选择。
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
- 07/03/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Price comparison
