Notebookcheck

宏碁 Aspire E5-575G (i5-7200U, GTX 950M) 笔记本电脑简短评测

丰富配置,低廉价格。 由于搭配了GeForce GTX 950M和快速的Kaby Lake处理器,宏碁Aspire E5-575G应该可以流畅运行十分复杂的游戏——而它的售价也只有600欧元(约4499人民币)。这其中的机关在哪儿呢?
Till Schönborn, Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D (Aspire E15 E5 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M - 2048 MB, Core: 928 MHz, Memory: 5000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 362.03, Optimus
Memory
8192 MB 
, 1x 8 GB DDR4-2133, 2个内存槽1个已占用
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Chi Mei CMN15C4, TN, LED 背光, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Toshiba MQ01ABD100, 1000 GB 
, 5400 rpm, 空余 M.2 插槽
Soundcard
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.0
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 29.2 x 382 x 259
Battery
62 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Linux
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, 90瓦电源适配器, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.4 kg, Power Supply: 460 g
Price
630 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

 
 
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
317 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
293 MBit/s ∼100%
164
cd/m²
167
cd/m²
166
cd/m²
162
cd/m²
176
cd/m²
166
cd/m²
177
cd/m²
178
cd/m²
162
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei CMN15C4
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 178 cd/m² Average: 168.7 cd/m² Minimum: 26 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 177 cd/m²
Contrast: 374:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.83 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 8.97 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
57.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 36.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Chi Mei CMN15C4, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Innolux N156HGE-EAL, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
ChiMei N156HGE-EAL, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
CMN15BA, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
LG LP156WF6-SPK1, AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Response Times
-5%
-15%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39 (21, 18)
44 (24, 20, starke Schwankungen mit/ohne PSU)
-13%
44 (25, 19, short plateau)
-13%
36 (13, 23)
8%
Response Time Black / White *
24 (19, 5)
23 (7, 16, Plateau)
4%
28 (11, 17, short plateau)
-17%
24 (8, 16)
-0%
PWM Frequency
1000 (80)
200 (90)
50 (50)
Screen
13%
27%
51%
22%
Brightness middle
176
234
33%
249
41%
389
121%
291
65%
Brightness
169
219
30%
240
42%
353
109%
270
60%
Brightness Distribution
91
80
-12%
86
-5%
83
-9%
85
-7%
Black Level *
0.47
0.48
-2%
0.48
-2%
0.31
34%
0.38
19%
Contrast
374
488
30%
519
39%
1255
236%
766
105%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.83
11.8
-34%
10.15
-15%
11.53
-31%
8.6
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
14.01
20.69
-48%
17.39
-24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.97
13.3
-48%
12.13
-35%
13.46
-50%
8.5
5%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.47 89%
2.48 89%
2.3 96%
2.31 95%
CCT
10234 64%
17098 38%
13445 48%
12024 54%
6184 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.8
74
101%
74
101%
46
25%
32
-13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57.3
100
75%
100
75%
71
24%
59
3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 10%
6% / 19%
51% / 51%
13% / 19%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9672 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼100% +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
141 Points ∼95% +9%
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼95% +9%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
136 Points ∼92% +5%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points ∼88% +1%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼87%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
119 Points ∼80% -8%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
115 Points ∼78% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
677 Points ∼100% +105%
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
673 Points ∼99% +103%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
465 Points ∼69% +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
347 Points ∼51% +5%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼49%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
Intel Core i7-6500U
300 Points ∼44% -9%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
295 Points ∼44% -11%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points ∼43% -13%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points ∼100% +14%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points ∼100% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.57 Points ∼93% +6%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.48 Points ∼88% 0%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.48 Points ∼88%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
1.46 Points ∼87% -1%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.35 Points ∼80% -9%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.33 Points ∼79% -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.48 Points ∼100% +102%
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.41 Points ∼99% +100%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
5.36 Points ∼72% +45%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.83 Points ∼51% +4%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.7 Points ∼49%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.33 Points ∼45% -10%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.24 Points ∼43% -12%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.19 Points ∼43% -14%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 2
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
31 fps ∼100% +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
22.62 fps ∼73% +4%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
21.68 fps ∼70%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
19.04 fps ∼61% -12%
Pass 1
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
149 fps ∼100% +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
120.37 fps ∼81% +7%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
112.11 fps ∼75%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
101.29 fps ∼68% -10%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
4620
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11301
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5022
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.7 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
53.83 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.48 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
331 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
129 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
74.96 fps
Help
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
5491%
29%
14969%
15639%
Write 4k QD32
0.722
73.15
10032%
0.884
22%
294.1
40634%
294.1
40634%
Read 4k QD32
0.647
112.2
17242%
0.895
38%
353.7
54568%
356.1
54939%
Write 4k
0.726
51.22
6955%
0.9
24%
90.62
12382%
100.1
13688%
Read 4k
0.366
30.69
8285%
0.413
13%
33.57
9072%
45.35
12291%
Write 512
25.93
90.61
249%
46.13
78%
302.2
1065%
383.6
1379%
Read 512
29.32
250
753%
35.32
20%
424.5
1348%
413.8
1311%
Write Seq
85.61
131.9
54%
105.6
23%
302.9
254%
459.4
437%
Read Seq
95.33
433.2
354%
108.1
13%
502.5
427%
509.3
434%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Transfer Rate Minimum: 39.8 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 111.2 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 86 MB/s
Access Time: 18.1 ms
Burst Rate: 113.3 MB/s
CPU Usage: 10 %
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
4498 Points ∼66% +11%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4047 Points ∼59%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3970 Points ∼58% -2%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3390 Points ∼54% +7%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
3266 Points ∼52% +3%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3162 Points ∼50%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3162 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3696 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4047 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5452 Points ∼100% +28%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4482 Points ∼82% +5%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6500U
4350 Points ∼80% +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4251 Points ∼78%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
4239 Points ∼78% 0%
Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-572G-54YG
NVIDIA GeForce 945M, Intel Core i5-6200U
2759 Points ∼51% -35%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4249 Points ∼100% +19%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
3574 Points ∼84%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
3555 Points ∼84% -1%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3238 Points ∼76% -9%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6500U
3102 Points ∼73% -13%
Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-572G-54YG
NVIDIA GeForce 945M, Intel Core i5-6200U
2816 Points ∼66% -21%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
27162 Points ∼100% +21%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
22439 Points ∼83%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
21715 Points ∼80% -3%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
21635 Points ∼80% -4%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6500U
20061 Points ∼74% -11%
Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-572G-54YG
NVIDIA GeForce 945M, Intel Core i5-6200U
17980 Points ∼66% -20%
3DMark 06 Standard
18647 points
3DMark 11 Performance
4212 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
45360 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
9392 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3218 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
1614 points
Help
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
29.6 fps ∼100% +57%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
21.1 fps ∼71% +12%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
18.8 fps ∼64%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
18.2 (17min - 21max) fps ∼61% -3%
Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
16.9 fps ∼57% -10%
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
35.8 fps ∼100% +13%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
31.6 fps ∼88%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
30.6 (29min - 34max) fps ∼85% -3%
Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
28.8 fps ∼80% -9%
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
45.8 fps ∼100% +31%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
35.7 (8.8min - 109.06max) fps ∼78% +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
35 fps ∼76%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
24 (5.7min - 45.5max) fps ∼52% -31%
1366x768 High Preset
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
110 fps ∼100% +27%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-50NC
GeForce GTX 950M, 6300HQ, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
87.6 fps ∼80% +1%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
86.7 fps ∼79%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
85.3 (14.66min - 145.45max) fps ∼78% -2%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
69.5 (11.6min - 138max) fps ∼63% -20%
Battlefield 4
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
28.5 fps ∼100% +6%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
26.9 fps ∼94%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
18.9 fps ∼66% -30%
1366x768 High Preset
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
63.1 fps ∼100% +3%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
61 fps ∼97%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9
46.2 fps ∼73% -24%
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 126.8 96.8 86.7 35 fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 109.7 78.6 61 26.9 fps
Dirt Rally (2015) 144.1 79.3 45.2 24.6 fps
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) 33.8 30.6 18.4 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 45.2 31.6 18.8 16.9 fps
The Division (2016) 63.8 41.5 20.4 15.4 fps
Hitman 2016 (2016) 34.6 34.1 11.6 fps
Overwatch (2016) 152.7 107.4 71.5 32.8 fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 69.3 51.6 23.6 18.3 fps
No Man's Sky (2016) 35.6 29.4 18.2 fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 30.9 24.5 14.2 fps

Noise Level

Idle
30.8 / 30.8 / 30.8 dB(A)
HDD
31.2 dB(A)
Load
33.4 / 40.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28.9 dB(A)
Max. Load
 41.6 °C41 °C33.2 °C 
 42.3 °C48.1 °C33.1 °C 
 36.7 °C41.8 °C35 °C 
Maximum: 48.1 °C
Average: 39.2 °C
30.8 °C42.1 °C60.8 °C
31.5 °C50.7 °C44.1 °C
34.8 °C37.4 °C34.5 °C
Maximum: 60.8 °C
Average: 40.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  55.3 °C | Room Temperature 24.5 °C | Fluke 62 Max
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.8 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.9 °C / -23.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.634.62534.736.43134.335.24033.834.85034.132.66333.635.5803436.710036.934.512537.237.116031.634.420031.347.625030.157.931530.259.840030.559.250029.163.163028.266.48003074.710003172.7125031.568.1160032.464.2200032.166.1250028.963.1315026.767.440002567.4500024.667.5630024.165.8800023.7631000023.559.81250023.361.71600023.154.6SPL41.279.8N3.946.4median 30median 63.1Delta2.66.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Aspire E5-575G-549DApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.25 / 1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6 / 8.1 / 9.8 Watt
Load midlight 52.5 / 81.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
6500U, GeForce GTX 950M, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9, AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60
Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption
-27%
-40%
-65%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
6
8.3
-38%
8.7
-45%
10.2
-70%
5.6
7%
Idle Average *
8.1
12.1
-49%
14.5
-79%
15.6
-93%
10.9
-35%
Idle Maximum *
9.8
15.4
-57%
15.6
-59%
17
-73%
10.6
-8%
Load Average *
52.5
56
-7%
61
-16%
79
-50%
61
-16%
Load Maximum *
81.6
70
14%
82
-0%
115.2
-41%
60
26%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
12h 47min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 15min
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873
6500U, GeForce GTX 950M, 44 Wh
Nexoc M512 III (W650RC) (i7,GTX 950M)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 56 Wh
Toshiba Satellite P50-C-188
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime
12%
-33%
-40%
-14%
-20%
Reader / Idle
767
667
-13%
521
-32%
715
-7%
535
-30%
H.264
460
335
-27%
114
-75%
241
-48%
305
-34%
WiFi v1.3
451
386
-14%
230
-49%
270
-40%
255
-43%
303
-33%
Load
75
152
103%
93
24%
108
44%
87
16%

Pros

+ 超高性价比
+ 不错的配置
+ 高速处理器
+ 适合游戏的显卡
+ 全高清屏幕
+ USB-C接口
+ 长电池续航
+ 空余M.2插槽
+ 支持无线ac标准

Cons

- 屏幕亮度较低
- 无操作系统
- 硬盘较慢
- 在压力测试中有降频现象
In review: Acer Aspire E5-575G. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Acer Aspire E5-575G. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

当然我们不能期待一台仅仅600欧元(约4499人民币)的笔记本电脑有完美无缺的高端特性。不过宏碁Aspire E15 E5-575G-549D依然是一台配置优秀,适合游戏的主流设备。它较低的售价来自一些让人遗憾的低成本设计。显然它的预算里不会有时尚的金属机身,高速固态硬盘或明亮IPS屏幕——不过最新的Kaby Lake处理器,高速中端显卡和8GB DDR4内存以及大容量硬盘都得到了存身之地。这台Aspire的配置十分适合游戏,不过屏幕原生分辨率只有在一部分情况下可以得到利用。不过,大部分新游戏都可以在降低图形细节后流畅运行,这并不是所有笔记本电脑都可以做到的。

除了机身品质和输入设备品质外,Aspire都可以得到十分不错的分数。除了屏幕过低的亮度,这台设备整体上几乎没有缺陷,在许多方面甚至表现超乎我们的预期:它可以提供7到8小时的实际使用电池续航时间,高速的无线ac连接几乎超过了许多更贵的机型。总结来说:

对于正在寻找一台实惠型多媒体笔记本电脑的用户,Aspire E5-575G是个不错的选择。它可以有足够的性能运行最新游戏,不过较暗的屏幕不太适合在户外使用。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 


Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D - 09/23/2016 v5.1(old)
Till Schönborn

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
82%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
51 / 81 → 63%
Weight
60 / 20-67 → 85%
Battery
89%
Display
70%
Games Performance
74 / 85 → 87%
Application Performance
79 / 92 → 85%
Temperature
85%
Noise
91 / 95 → 96%
Audio
56%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Average
73%
80%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 宏碁 Aspire E5-575G (i5-7200U, GTX 950M) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Till Schönborn, 2016-10- 1 (Update: 2016-10- 1)