Notebookcheck

惠普 Pavilion 15t-au100 (W0P31AV) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Bernhard Pechlaner (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 01/13/2017
Kaby Lake Windows Geforce Laptop / Notebook

捉襟见肘。功能强大的新一代i7处理器结合专用的图形处理器——字面上,15.6英寸惠普Pavilion 15t-au100似乎是一个非常理想的笔记本。然而,缓慢的常规硬盘驱动器,暗淡的显示面板和短暂的电池续航都是最显着的缺点。

HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) (Pavilion 15-cx Series)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB, Core: 1188 MHz, Memory: 1000 MHz, 21.21.13.7290, Nvidia
Memory
8196 MB 
, PC4-19200
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, no, BOE0693, IPS, SVA防眩光 WLED背光, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Toshiba MQ01ABD100, 1000 GB 
, 5400 rpm, 1000 GB
Soundcard
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: audio-combo, Card Reader: 多种格式SD卡
Networking
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.0
Optical drive
HP DVD RW DS-8A8SH
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 22.5 x 383 x 243
Battery
41 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 惠普全视角高清摄像头 包含双阵列数字麦克风
Additional features
Speakers: B&O PLAY; 惠普音频增强; 双扬声器, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.084 kg, Power Supply: 334 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7
 
121 MB/s ∼100% +99%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
 
60.9 MB/s ∼50%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
 
59 MB/s ∼49% -3%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
 
52.6 MB/s ∼43% -14%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
 
19.1 MB/s ∼16% -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7
 
211 MB/s ∼100% +139%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
 
88.39 MB/s ∼42%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
 
80.9 MB/s ∼38% -8%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
 
27 MB/s ∼13% -69%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
 
24.9 MB/s ∼12% -72%
Networking
WiFi Speed Client 1m
WiFi Speed Server 1m
WiFi Speed Client 1m 512KB
WiFi Speed Server 1m 512KB
WiFi Speed Client 1m 4M x10
WiFi Speed Server 1m 4M x10 (-R)
WiFi Speed Client 1m 4M x10 (-R) - RU
WiFi Speed Client 1m 4M x10 - RU
1280x800 Lightsmark - 1280x800
1280x800 Lightsmark - 1280x800
1280x720 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720
1280x768 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768
1366x768 3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768
1600x900 Crysis CPU - 1600x900 High
1600x900 Crysis CPU - 1600x900 Med
1600x900 Crysis CPU - 1600x900 Low
1600x900 Crysis GPU - 1600x900 High
1600x900 Crysis GPU - 1600x900 Med
1600x900 Crysis GPU - 1600x900 Low
201.8
cd/m²
193.9
cd/m²
183.6
cd/m²
179.5
cd/m²
186.5
cd/m²
159.7
cd/m²
155.5
cd/m²
169.3
cd/m²
138.8
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE0693
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 201.8 cd/m² Average: 174.3 cd/m² Minimum: 14.85 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 69 %
Center on Battery: 186.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1036:1 (Black: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
64.95% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 44.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
BOE0693, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Chi Mei CMN15C4, TN, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
SDC5958, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Response Times
14%
-36%
18%
190%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (13.2, 28.8)
40 (20, 20)
5%
51 (18, 33)
-21%
39 (21, 18)
7%
39.6 (18.4, 21.2)
6%
Response Time Black / White *
33.6 (7.6, 26)
26 (6, 20)
23%
38 (8, 30)
-13%
24 (19, 5)
29%
27.2 (7.6, 19.6)
19%
PWM Frequency
198.4
50 (10)
-75%
1282 (59)
546%
Screen
16%
21%
-35%
10%
Brightness middle
186.5
326
75%
291
56%
176
-6%
336.2
80%
Brightness
174
316
82%
265
52%
169
-3%
323
86%
Brightness Distribution
69
80
16%
86
25%
91
32%
87
26%
Black Level *
0.18
0.35
-94%
0.23
-28%
0.47
-161%
0.629
-249%
Contrast
1036
931
-10%
1265
22%
374
-64%
534
-48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.7
5.49
4%
4.78
16%
8.83
-55%
3.32
42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
22.5
11.36
50%
9.51
58%
14.01
38%
7.4
67%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.4
4.84
-10%
3.49
21%
8.97
-104%
2.88
35%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.23 99%
2.58 85%
2.43 91%
2.34 94%
CCT
6963 93%
5971 109%
6013 108%
10234 64%
6279 104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
44.71
53
19%
40
-11%
36.8
-18%
55.3
24%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
64.95
80
23%
64
-1%
57.3
-12%
85.5
32%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
15% / 15%
-8% / 8%
-9% / -26%
100% / 51%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 28.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 198.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
148 Points ∼66% +5%
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
147 Points ∼66% +4%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
146 Points ∼65% +4%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
Intel Core i7-7500U
141 Points ∼63%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼63% -1%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
130 Points ∼58% -8%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼58% -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼16% +97%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼15% +96%
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
663 Points ∼15% +92%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
Intel Core i7-7500U
345 Points ∼8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
338 Points ∼8% -2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼8% -4%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
326 Points ∼7% -6%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points ∼66% +1%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.67 Points ∼65%
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.66 Points ∼65% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.49 Points ∼58% -11%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.48 Points ∼58% -11%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
1.47 Points ∼57% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.48 Points ∼17% +98%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.48 Points ∼17% +98%
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.41 Points ∼17% +96%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.78 Points ∼9%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.7 Points ∼8% -2%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
3.61 Points ∼8% -4%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
5687 Points ∼52% 0%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
Intel Core i7-7500U
5670 Points ∼52%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5485 Points ∼51% -3%
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5480 Points ∼51% -3%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5451 Points ∼50% -4%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
5022 Points ∼46% -11%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
4917 Points ∼45% -13%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20305 Points ∼31% +69%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20090 Points ∼31% +67%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20033 Points ∼31% +66%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
Intel Core i7-7500U
12043 Points ∼18%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
11301 Points ∼17% -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
11211 Points ∼17% -7%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Intel Core i7-6500U
11024 Points ∼17% -8%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
Intel Core i7-7500U
492.28 s * ∼6%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
485.279 s * ∼6% +1%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
372.971 s * ∼4% +24%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
232.408 s * ∼3% +53%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
643.2 Seconds * ∼3% -5%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
Intel Core i7-7500U
609.67 Seconds * ∼3%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
597.283 Seconds * ∼3% +2%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
555.465 Seconds * ∼2% +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5670
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
12043
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6412
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.67 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.78 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
51.78 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
141 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
345 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
66.93 fps
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
4696 Points ∼71% +8%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4341 Points ∼66% 0%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4340 Points ∼66%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4047 Points ∼61% -7%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
3717 Points ∼56% -14%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
4659 Points ∼43% +14%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
4648 Points ∼43% +14%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4118 Points ∼38% +1%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4089 Points ∼37%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3696 Points ∼34% -10%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
3778 Points ∼62% +10%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
3753 Points ∼62% +10%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3424 Points ∼56%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3370 Points ∼55% -2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3162 Points ∼52% -8%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
3101 Points ∼51% -9%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3424 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4089 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4340 points
Help
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Liteonit CV3-DE256
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-20%
10956%
7338%
16558%
6456%
Write 4k QD32
0.893
0.722
-19%
245.9
27436%
234
26104%
343.8
38399%
177.6
19788%
Read 4k QD32
0.81
0.647
-20%
364.7
44925%
149
18295%
542
66814%
143.7
17641%
Write 4k
1.008
0.726
-28%
66.8
6527%
74.86
7327%
132.4
13035%
77.65
7603%
Read 4k
0.429
0.366
-15%
28.68
6585%
22.43
5128%
41.4
9550%
22.08
5047%
Write 512
40.02
25.93
-35%
297.9
644%
280.1
600%
588.1
1370%
180
350%
Read 512
34.08
29.32
-14%
338.3
893%
279.2
719%
632.2
1755%
307.6
803%
Write Seq
105.2
85.61
-19%
431.5
310%
325.5
209%
589.9
461%
185.2
76%
Read Seq
109.5
95.33
-13%
469.2
328%
459.3
319%
1291
1079%
484.6
343%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Transfer Rate Minimum: 52.9 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 93.2 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 77.5 MB/s
Access Time: 18.2 ms
Burst Rate: 327.4 MB/s
CPU Usage: 5.8 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5472 Points ∼24% +181%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼20% +129%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4113 Points ∼18% +111%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
1946 Points ∼9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
1803 Points ∼8% -7%
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5452 Points ∼11% +113%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% +89%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4251 Points ∼8% +66%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2556 Points ∼5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2436 Points ∼5% -5%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4249 Points ∼10% +143%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4232 Points ∼10% +142%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% +136%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
3574 Points ∼9% +104%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
1750 Points ∼4%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
29118 Points ∼15% +213%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
27162 Points ∼14% +192%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
25986 Points ∼13% +180%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
22439 Points ∼11% +141%
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
9297 Points ∼5%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
106431 Points ∼15%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
45299 Points ∼6%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
38062 Points ∼5%
3DMark 11 Performance
2622 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7017 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1538 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
777 points
Help
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
10.1 fps ∼5%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
16.9 fps ∼8% +67%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
21.2 fps ∼11% +110%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
23.5 fps ∼12% +133%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
13.2 fps ∼6%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
18.8 fps ∼8% +42%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
23.8 fps ∼11% +80%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
29.6 fps ∼13% +124%
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
22.1 fps ∼9%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
31.6 fps ∼13% +43%
1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
34.7 fps ∼10%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
45.2 fps ∼13% +30%
GRID 2
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
21.2 fps ∼16%
1366x768 High Preset AA:2xMS (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
60.3 fps ∼32%
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
89.8 fps ∼46%
1024x768 Ultra Low Preset (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
125.4 fps ∼57%
Metro: Last Light
1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
11.6 fps ∼7%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
30.9 fps ∼18% +166%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
31.4 fps ∼18% +171%
1366x768 High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
23.5 fps ∼12%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
55.7 fps ∼29% +137%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
58.4 fps ∼30% +149%
1366x768 Medium (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
38.4 fps ∼20%
1024x768 Low (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
49.3 fps ∼25%
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
14.6 fps ∼5%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
39.4 fps ∼15% +170%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
13.5 fps ∼5% -8%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
35 fps ∼13% +140%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
44.1 fps ∼17% +202%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
45.8 fps ∼17% +214%
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
42.7 fps ∼10%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
92.3 fps ∼23% +116%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
39.1 fps ∼10% -8%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
86.7 fps ∼21% +103%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
106.9 fps ∼26% +150%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
110 fps ∼27% +158%
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
62.4 fps ∼14%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
103.5 fps ∼23% +66%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
48.6 fps ∼11% -22%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
96.8 fps ∼22% +55%
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
90.3 fps ∼17%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
143.6 fps ∼27% +59%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
85.9 fps ∼16% -5%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
126.8 fps ∼24% +40%
Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
18.3 fps ∼6%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
50.1 fps ∼16% +174%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
52.4 fps ∼16% +186%
1366x768 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
37.4 fps ∼6%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
110.2 fps ∼18% +195%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
112 fps ∼18% +199%
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
66.4 fps ∼10%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
153.6 fps ∼23% +131%
1024x768 Low Preset (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
137 fps ∼18%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
232.6 fps ∼31% +70%
Company of Heroes 2
1920x1080 Maximum / Higher / High AA:High (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
7.2 fps ∼11%
1366x768 High AA:Medium (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
21 fps ∼27%
1366x768 Medium AA:Off (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
29.5 fps ∼41%
1024x768 Minimum / Low / Off AA:Off (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
36.1 fps ∼45%
Sleeping Dogs
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
9 fps ∼6%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
23.4 fps ∼16% +160%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
24.1 fps ∼16% +168%
1366x768 High Preset AA:High (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
34 fps ∼13%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
89.2 fps ∼33% +162%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
91.2 fps ∼34% +168%
1366x768 Medium Preset AA:Normal (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
69.9 fps ∼24%
1024x768 Low Preset AA:Normal (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
92.9 fps ∼27%
low med. high ultra
Dirt 3 (2011) 67.8 48.7 41.6 28.9 fps
Anno 2070 (2011) 130.4 66.8 42.5 21 fps
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 92.9 69.9 34 9 fps
Hitman: Absolution (2012) 61.3 38.3 17.8 6.6 fps
Tomb Raider (2013) 137 66.4 37.4 18.3 fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 90.3 62.4 42.7 14.6 fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 49.3 38.4 23.5 11.6 fps
GRID 2 (2013) 125.4 89.8 60.3 21.2 fps
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 36.1 29.5 21 7.2 fps
F1 2013 (2013) 120 81 41 31 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 34.7 22.1 13.2 10.1 fps

Noise Level

Idle
32.2 / 32.2 / 33.7 dB(A)
Load
39.4 / 42.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1 (15 cm distance)
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
Noise
-1%
5%
7%
5%
-4%
off / environment *
31.6
31.6
28.9
29.5
Idle Minimum *
32.2
31.6
2%
32.6
-1%
30.8
4%
29.2
9%
32.3
-0%
Idle Average *
32.2
31.6
2%
32.6
-1%
30.8
4%
29.3
9%
32.4
-1%
Idle Maximum *
33.7
33.4
1%
32.6
3%
30.8
9%
29.5
12%
32.4
4%
Load Average *
39.4
41.7
-6%
35.3
10%
33.4
15%
36.5
7%
40.5
-3%
Load Maximum *
42.2
44.8
-6%
37.1
12%
40.1
5%
47.7
-13%
50.3
-19%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 21.4 °C32 °C40 °C 
 21 °C32.4 °C38.4 °C 
 20.8 °C23.6 °C24.8 °C 
Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 28.3 °C
34.8 °C31 °C22.4 °C
29.4 °C30.4 °C22.8 °C
25.8 °C24.8 °C23 °C
Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 27.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  48.2 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (+1.8 °C / 3.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs20038.635.12503535.231030.932.140031.332.250031.330.863030.53280031.332.8100032.330.5125033.733.4160029.332.3200028.834.425002741.7315026.345.6400025.749.2500024.754.7630024.455.7800025.6581000024.357.11250024.157.41600023.857.6200002356.12500022.955.43150022.557.34000022.655.35000022.651.36300022.550.48000022.548.210000022.648.612500022.542.516000022.739.2SPL035.867.4N02.621.8median 24.1median 50.4Delta2.37.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (58 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight / 0.38 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.16 / 8.48 / 9.62 Watt
Load midlight 41.63 / 63.22 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-DE256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Power Consumption
-18%
15%
-10%
-69%
Idle Minimum *
6.16
5
19%
3.9
37%
6
3%
8.3
-35%
Idle Average *
8.48
8.9
-5%
7.4
13%
8.1
4%
14.8
-75%
Idle Maximum *
9.62
11.8
-23%
9.5
1%
9.8
-2%
16.8
-75%
Load Average *
41.63
55
-32%
41
2%
52.5
-26%
71
-71%
Load Maximum *
63.22
93
-47%
48
24%
81.6
-29%
119.2
-89%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
7h 18min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 46min
HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV)
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, 48 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 84 Wh
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 61.5 Wh
Battery Runtime
57%
25%
50%
90%
8%
Reader / Idle
438
816
86%
767
75%
979
124%
510
16%
WiFi v1.3
220
430
95%
275
25%
451
105%
544
147%
264
20%
Load
106
95
-10%
75
-29%
106
0%
93
-12%

Pros

+ IPS显示
+ 背光键盘
+ 优秀的整体表现
+ 端口齐全
+ 专用图形处理器

Cons

- 传统且平庸性能的硬盘驱动器
- 昏暗并反光屏幕
- 机身不算坚固
- 触摸板不是很大
- 令人失望的电池续航
In review: HP Pavilion 15t-au100 (W0P31AV). Test model provided by CUKUSA.com
In review: HP Pavilion 15t-au100 (W0P31AV). Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

惠普Pavilion 15t-au100是一款富有吸引力的15.6英寸笔记本电脑,具有足够的性能来应对日常工作。配备了新一代双核i7处理器,8GB内存和专用的中端显卡GeForce 940MX,即使是轻量级到中等的游戏也不在话下。虽然整体性能非常体面,但该机型的瓶颈毫无疑问是在机械硬盘驱动器上,它的转速在5400RPM。该笔记本电脑没有使用固态驱动器的竞争对手那么快。幸运的是,该系列的一些型号配备了PCIe NVMe M.2固态硬盘,甚至可以配备固态硬盘和常规SATA驱动器,以提高性能,同时保持存储成本的低廉。

另一个缺点在于屏幕,它非常昏暗还带有眩光问题。这两个问题使得,在户外或是明亮的环境中工作成为一个挑战。最后,电池续航时间也有限。有些竞争对手甚至拥有它两倍的续航时间。

惠普Pavilion 15t提供了不错的性能,但仍然受制于机械硬盘驱动器,屏幕以及短暂的电池续航。除非惠普提高全高清机型的亮度,否则我们宁愿选择带有固态硬盘驱动器和更强的图形的超高清机型。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

HP Pavilion 15t-au100 CTO (W0P31AV) - 01/07/2017 v6(old)
Bernhard Pechlaner

Chassis
75 / 98 → 77%
Keyboard
77%
Pointing Device
68%
Connectivity
44 / 81 → 54%
Weight
63 / 20-67 → 90%
Battery
73%
Display
73%
Games Performance
65 / 85 → 76%
Application Performance
80 / 92 → 87%
Temperature
94%
Noise
84 / 95 → 88%
Audio
60%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Average
69%
76%
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普 Pavilion 15t-au100 (W0P31AV) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Bernhard Pechlaner, 2017-01-13 (Update: 2017-01-14)
Bernhard Pechlaner
Editor of the original article: Bernhard Pechlaner - Review Editor