Notebookcheck

EVGA SC15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Allen Ngo (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 07/18/2017
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Windows Notebook

几乎可以说是最强的GTX 1060 笔记本。 “轻薄”,却不“薄”。SC15是体型大,但不笨重;运行快速但不嘈杂。在2000美元以下的价位里,它接近于我们所期望游戏本的样子。

EVGA SC15 (SC Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Core: 1455 MHz, Memory: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 381.99
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 1300 MHz, Dual-Channel, 16-16-16-39
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM175
Storage
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, 256 GB 
, Secondary: 1 TB Seagate ST1000LM048 HDD
Soundcard
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机端口, 3.5毫米麦克风端口, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 22.55 x 387 x 260
Battery
62 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Torq X10 mouse, leather pad, USB Type-C to USB Type-A adapter, User's manual, EVGA PrecisionX Mobile, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.93 kg, Power Supply: 794 g
Price
1900 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: USB 3.0, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0b, mDP 1.4, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter, Kensington Lock
Right: USB 3.0, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0b, mDP 1.4, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: 3.5 mm audio, 3.5 mm microphone, 2x USB 3.0
Left: 3.5 mm audio, 3.5 mm microphone, 2x USB 3.0
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
EVGA SC15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
657 MBit/s ∼99%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
648 MBit/s ∼98% -1%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
594 MBit/s ∼100% +65%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
529 MBit/s ∼89% +47%
EVGA SC15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
361 MBit/s ∼61%
249.9
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
270.7
cd/m²
233.1
cd/m²
281.5
cd/m²
272.9
cd/m²
205.5
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
235.7
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 281.5 cd/m² Average: 253.5 cd/m² Minimum: 1.93 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 73 %
Center on Battery: 281.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1043:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | - Ø
89.3% sRGB (Argyll) 57.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.27
EVGA SC15
ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, , 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus GX501
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
APPA031, IPS, 15.4, 2880x1800
Gigabyte Aero 15
N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Aorus X5 v6
IPS, 15.6, 2880x1620
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Response Times
13%
-13%
-4%
7%
28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.6 (21.6, 20)
40.4 (23.2, 17.2)
3%
48 (23.6, 24.4)
-15%
42.8 (23.6, 19.2)
-3%
34 (19, 25)
18%
28 (15.6, 12.4)
33%
Response Time Black / White *
30.8 (17.6, 13.2)
24 (11.6, 12.4)
22%
33.8 (19.6, 14.2)
-10%
32 (18.8, 13.2)
-4%
32 (8, 24)
-4%
23.6 (15.2, 8.4)
23%
PWM Frequency
119000 (80, 210)
26000 (20)
198.4
1351 (39)
Screen
-6%
32%
-9%
-4%
-45%
Brightness
253
305
21%
523
107%
316
25%
271
7%
263
4%
Brightness Distribution
73
83
14%
86
18%
90
23%
83
14%
92
26%
Black Level *
0.27
0.25
7%
0.44
-63%
0.36
-33%
0.249
8%
0.44
-63%
Contrast
1043
1312
26%
1239
19%
889
-15%
1126
8%
623
-40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.9
6.02
-54%
1.6
59%
4.62
-18%
4.94
-27%
8
-105%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.8
6.32
-66%
1.9
50%
6
-58%
5.13
-35%
9.1
-139%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.28 105%
2.26 106%
2.46 98%
2.26 106%
2.24 107%
CCT
7322 89%
8194 79%
6834 95%
6761 96%
7433 87%
5020 129%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57.8
60
4%
60
4%
55.9
-3%
45.7
-21%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89.3
92
3%
92
3%
85.9
-4%
72.1
-19%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / -2%
10% / 21%
-7% / -8%
2% / -2%
-9% / -30%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.6 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼97% +19%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼82%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
156 Points ∼80% -2%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
155 Points ∼79% -3%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
152 Points ∼78% -5%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
143 Points ∼73% -11%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
141 Points ∼72% -12%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points ∼72% -12%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
131 Points ∼67% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼42% +22%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
772 Points ∼36% +5%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points ∼34% 0%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼34%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
706 Points ∼33% -4%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
682 Points ∼32% -7%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼31% -8%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
566 Points ∼26% -23%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
515 Points ∼24% -30%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points ∼99% +27%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.84 Points ∼83% +6%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼83% +6%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.73 Points ∼78%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.68 Points ∼76% -3%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.66 Points ∼75% -4%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.55 Points ∼70% -10%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.49 Points ∼67% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points ∼41% +20%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.44 Points ∼35% +3%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points ∼34%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points ∼34% 0%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.75 Points ∼32% -5%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.53 Points ∼32% -8%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.39 Points ∼31% -10%
Toshiba Satellite S70-B-106
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
6.02 Points ∼25% -26%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points ∼81% +19%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6182 Points ∼70% +2%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6051 Points ∼68%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5954 Points ∼67% -2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
5632 Points ∼63% -7%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5525 Points ∼62% -9%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5449 Points ∼61% -10%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4720 Points ∼53% -22%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points ∼57% +28%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
23041 Points ∼46% +5%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22512 Points ∼45% +2%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22041 Points ∼44%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
21313 Points ∼43% -3%
MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
19720 Points ∼40% -11%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
18785 Points ∼38% -15%
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
18296 Points ∼37% -17%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.726 s * ∼3% -6%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
213.193 s * ∼3% -0%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
212.46 s * ∼3%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
211.321 s * ∼2% +1%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
210.067 s * ∼2% +1%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.329 s * ∼2% +17%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Intel Core i7-6820HK
572.296 Seconds * ∼3% -6%
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
561.953 Seconds * ∼2% -4%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
540.619 Seconds * ∼2%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
535.159 Seconds * ∼2% +1%
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
519.371 Seconds * ∼2% +4%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
440.036 Seconds * ∼2% +19%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11054
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22041
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6051
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
71.25 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.18 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.73 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
117.23 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
736 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
160 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5400 Points ∼83%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
5053 Points ∼78% -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4648 Points ∼71% -14%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
7973 Points ∼86% +6%
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
7505 Points ∼81%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4914 Points ∼53% -35%
Home Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5085 Points ∼85%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4828 Points ∼81% -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4054 Points ∼68% -20%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5085 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7505 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5400 points
Help
EVGA SC15
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Aorus X5 v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
Aorus X7 DT v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
AS SSD
37%
-56%
9%
17%
Copy Game MB/s
977.48
1081.99
11%
1072.6
10%
539.5
-45%
1134
16%
Copy Program MB/s
442.3
401.94
-9%
351.48
-21%
411.54
-7%
502
13%
Copy ISO MB/s
1070.79
1666.02
56%
351.13
-67%
1272.4
19%
1482
38%
Score Total
2474
3756
52%
1630
-34%
2810
14%
2695
9%
Score Write
896
1468
64%
514
-43%
1022
14%
665
-26%
Score Read
1081
1549
43%
756
-30%
1206
12%
1353
25%
Access Time Write *
0.035
0.029
17%
0.025
29%
0.034
3%
0.025
29%
Access Time Read *
0.054
0.041
24%
0.367
-580%
0.034
37%
0.047
13%
4K-64 Write
705.92
1185.25
68%
272.53
-61%
788.85
12%
366.91
-48%
4K-64 Read
821.51
1228.73
50%
521.36
-37%
961.61
17%
1106.67
35%
4K Write
95.46
127.63
34%
131.32
38%
112.15
17%
149.13
56%
4K Read
39.13
48.01
23%
44.6
14%
41.34
6%
48.93
25%
Seq Write
942.8
1550.23
64%
1098.57
17%
1206.58
28%
1493.99
58%
Seq Read
2203.33
2719.21
23%
1904.01
-14%
2026.09
-8%
1971.14
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Sequential Read: 2203.33 MB/s
Sequential Write: 942.8 MB/s
4K Read: 39.13 MB/s
4K Write: 95.46 MB/s
4K-64 Read: 821.51 MB/s
4K-64 Write: 705.92 MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.054 ms
Access Time Write: 0.035 ms
Copy ISO: 1070.79 MB/s
Copy Program: 442.3 MB/s
Copy Game: 977.48 MB/s
Score Read: 1081 Points
Score Write: 896 Points
Score Total: 2474 Points
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
5120 Points ∼51% +99%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
4206 Points ∼42% +64%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
4048 Points ∼40% +57%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
2893 Points ∼29% +13%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
2571 Points ∼25%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
739 Points ∼7% -71%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
10382 Points ∼63% +91%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
8626 Points ∼53% +59%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
5441 Points ∼33%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
3517 Points ∼21% -35%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
2629 Points ∼16% -52%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
1988 Points ∼12% -63%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
21781 Points ∼54% +90%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
18373 Points ∼45% +60%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
18219 Points ∼45% +59%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
12984 Points ∼32% +13%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11453 Points ∼28%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11134 Points ∼27% -3%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7321 Points ∼18% -36%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6002 Points ∼15% -48%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% -64%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
11160 Points ∼70% +26%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
10419 Points ∼65% +17%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
10081 Points ∼63% +14%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
8935 Points ∼56% +1%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
8876 Points ∼56%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7952 Points ∼50% -10%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7371 Points ∼46% -17%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼28% -50%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
28321 Points ∼56% +83%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
23540 Points ∼46% +52%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7820HK
23170 Points ∼45% +50%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
17401 Points ∼34% +13%
EVGA SC15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
15453 Points ∼30%
Lenovo Lenovo Legion Y720 80VR002XGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
14233 Points ∼28% -8%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
9824 Points ∼19% -36%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7537 Points ∼15% -51%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% -69%
3DMark 11 Performance
13148 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
110194 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
24201 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9750 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5165 points
Help
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 110fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 82.7fps
Thief (2014) 79fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 6639.6fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 8962fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 117.9fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 70.8fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 66.8fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 63.759.2fps
Doom (2016) 98.4fps
Overwatch (2016) 103.9fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 41fps
Prey (2017) 110.3fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
96.4 fps ∼100% +44%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
66.9 fps ∼69% 0%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
66.5 fps ∼69% 0%
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
66.8 fps ∼69%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
65 fps ∼67% -3%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
54.7 fps ∼57% -18%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps ∼44% -36%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
32.5 fps ∼34% -51%
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
24.2 fps ∼25% -64%
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra

Noise Level

Idle
31.9 / 32 / 32 dB(A)
Load
36.5 / 53.4 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28 dB(A)
EVGA SC15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Noise
-2%
1%
-3%
-4%
-14%
off / environment *
28
31
-11%
30.9
-10%
28.8
-3%
31
-11%
29.3
-5%
Idle Minimum *
31.9
32
-0%
31.3
2%
33.1
-4%
32
-0%
33.4
-5%
Idle Average *
32
33
-3%
31.3
2%
33.1
-3%
33
-3%
35.2
-10%
Idle Maximum *
32
34
-6%
31.7
1%
34
-6%
34
-6%
35.2
-10%
Load Average *
36.5
39
-7%
39.7
-9%
37.2
-2%
39
-7%
53.3
-46%
Witcher 3 ultra *
40.3
42
-4%
35.5
12%
46.1
-14%
43
-7%
Load Maximum *
53.4
46
14%
48.6
9%
47.1
12%
50
6%
57.6
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 33.2 °C49.2 °C35 °C 
 34.2 °C39.8 °C32 °C 
 28.4 °C26.2 °C29.8 °C 
Maximum: 49.2 °C
Average: 34.2 °C
32.4 °C45.2 °C37 °C
35 °C39.4 °C35.8 °C
31.8 °C33 °C31.6 °C
Maximum: 45.2 °C
Average: 35.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  44 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.2442537.338.13134.836.14033.533.65034.533.2633433.98032.932.310031.731.512530.530.816030.935.820029.334.725028.535.931527.338.64002741.750026.845.563025.152.180026.660.1100025.961.2125024.459.5160024.256.8200023.753.7250023.552.5315023.551.5400023.548.5500023.250.3630023.253.3800023.256.11000023.154.1125002347.9160002341.6SPL36.667.5N2.821median 24.4EVGA SC15median 50.3Delta2.56.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
EVGA SC15 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (61.19 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 34%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.43 / 0.68 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 25.8 / 26.6 / 26.7 Watt
Load midlight 80.3 / 159.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
EVGA SC15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus GX501
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, Apple SSD SM0256L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4
Gigabyte Aero 15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 2880x1620, 15.6
Power Consumption
-3%
46%
21%
-33%
Idle Minimum *
25.8
18
30%
3.4
87%
12
53%
25
3%
Idle Average *
26.6
23
14%
13.9
48%
15
44%
28.9
-9%
Idle Maximum *
26.7
31
-16%
17.6
34%
20
25%
30.1
-13%
Load Average *
80.3
79
2%
71.1
11%
82
-2%
167.3
-108%
Load Maximum *
159.3
196
-23%
88.5
44%
161
-1%
222.6
-40%
Witcher 3 ultra *
121.2
148
-22%
57.9
52%
111
8%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
3h 42min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
2h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 21min
EVGA SC15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 62 Wh
Asus Zephyrus GX501
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 50 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, 76 Wh
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Battery Runtime
-28%
130%
35%
126%
15%
Reader / Idle
222
188
-15%
386
74%
638
187%
249
12%
WiFi v1.3
167
130
-22%
644
286%
232
39%
422
153%
182
9%
Load
81
44
-46%
60
-26%
75
-7%
112
38%
100
23%
Witcher 3 ultra
87

Pros

+ 非常坚固的机身,坚硬的铝框架;优秀的构建质量
+ 优异的对比度,广泛的色彩覆盖;大于90%的sRGB
+ 易于使用且功能众多的PrecisionX Mobile软件
+ 游戏时的不错的核心温度
+ 不像其他轻薄游戏笔记本那么大噪声
+ 相对好用的2.5英寸SATA III 插槽
+ Thunderbolt 3,HDMI 2.0b,mDP 1.4
+ 120 Hz G-Sync显示标准
+ 2年保修标准
+ 没有中央处理器或图形处理器节流
+ 坚固的盖子和铰链

Cons

- 有限的显示屏幕选项;没有5 ms响应时间,4K UHD屏幕或触摸屏
- 扬声器弱;低音和低音扬声器定位弱
- SODIMM,M.2,WLAN模块需要额外的拆卸
- 普通的显示响应时间;颗粒状哑光面板
- 没有彩色背光;有限定制
- 标准的音频输出;没有ESS Sabre DAC
- 空闲时耗电量高
- F键和箭头键小
- 不均匀的触摸板按键反馈力度
- 非常浅的键程
- 沉重而昂贵
- 电池续航不佳
In review: EVGA SC15 GTX 1060. Test model provided by EVGA
In review: EVGA SC15 GTX 1060. Test model provided by EVGA

SC15满足了我们对一个平衡的GTX 1060 游戏本的所有期望。机身外壳质量很高,风扇声音不是很嘈杂,中央处理器性能表现稳定,G-Sync 和120 Hz 刷新率都合乎标准。那些正在考虑 GS63VR, Omen 15, Gigabyte P55, Asus GL552/FX502, Aorus X5, 或者其他15英寸游戏本的用户,将会发现EVGA不仅仅只是表面上的更加坚固耐用,而且也更加安静低温。如果续航时间,温度和噪声水平是第一考虑要素,那么大概没有更好的其他选择了。

SC15也有一些缺点,如果把它作为一个15英寸GTX 1060游戏笔记本电脑来看的话,也许最大的缺点是:缺少任何其他显示屏幕可选方案。微星和Aorus提供了5 毫秒和3 毫秒的响应时间的面板,与EVGA上的18 毫秒(黑白)相比,显着减少了重影。较高的120 Hz的刷新率是不错,但是它的优点被较低的响应速度拖累,并且需要更强大的图形处理器来达到这样高的帧速率,进而来实现快速输入的延迟。一个120 Hz / 5 ms的屏幕兴许会是SC15最好的选择,即便是TN面板损失了IPS应该有的宽视角。

对于屏幕的抱怨远没有结束,亚光面板蛮厚的,虽然这样子盖子可以更加坚固灵活,但是使得显示内容增加了颗粒感。

其他的一些缺陷很小,虽然让情况更糟了。薄弱的扬声器;集合的SD读卡器的缺失;短的续航时间;高的待机电源消耗;重量上,可能让一部分玩家不满。像大多数Apple电话一样,价格高不代表性能强大,而是代表合乎预期的整体质量。

SC15比其他同等大小的游戏本更坚固,更安静,更多彩。它较低的显示反应时间,和可选型号的缺失,拉低了原本有的质量。

注:本文是基于完整评测减版本,阅读完整的英文评测

EVGA SC15 - 07/05/2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Chassis
92 / 98 → 94%
Keyboard
84%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
66 / 81 → 81%
Weight
57 / 66 → 84%
Battery
68%
Display
85%
Games Performance
92%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
88 / 95 → 93%
Noise
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
50%
Camera
47 / 85 → 56%
Average
76%
85%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > EVGA SC15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Allen Ngo, 2017-07-18 (Update: 2017-07-23)