傲睿士 X7 DT v6 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Aorus X7 DT v6
Brand: Aorus

性能无极限。 技嘉X7 DT v6将傲睿士游戏本的设计推向了一个新的高度。它带来了业界领先的显卡和处理器性能，高速固态硬盘盒强劲的网络模组以及屏幕选项。有能够让它慢下来的东西吗？

Steve Schardein (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 11/26/2016 🇺🇸 🇭🇺 ...

Windows Skylake Gaming

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Aorus X7 DT v6 (X7 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-6820HK 4 x 2.7 - 3.6 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile - 8192 MB MB VRAM, Core: 1733 MHz, Memory: 10000 MHz MHz, 21.21.13.6926 - ForceWare 369.26, no

Memory

32 GB

, DDR4-2400

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, AUO1096, TN LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Sunrise Point HM170

Storage

Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB

Soundcard

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机接口（S/PDIF），麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC

Networking

Killer E2200 (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 426 x 308

Battery

94 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0 + 2 低音炮, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

3.25 kg, Power Supply: 900 g

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, headphones, microphone

Right: SD card reader (full), USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen 1, HDMI, mini DisplayPort

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT73VR 6RF	155.1 MB/s +86%
Aorus X7 DT v6	83.3 MB/s
Aorus X7 v6	78 MB/s -6%
HP Omen 17-w110ng	76 MB/s -9%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T	74 MB/s -11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT73VR 6RF	209.4 MB/s +131%
Aorus X7 DT v6	90.6 MB/s
HP Omen 17-w110ng	87 MB/s -4%
Aorus X7 v6	87 MB/s -4%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T	84 MB/s -7%


308.7 cd/m²	319.9 cd/m²	294.9 cd/m²
320.6 cd/m²	339.5 cd/m²	296.3 cd/m²
307.6 cd/m²	322.3 cd/m²	270.5 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUO1096 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 339.5 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 308.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 339.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 754:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.57 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.04

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Aorus X7 DT v6 AUO1096, TN LED, 17.30, 2560x1440	Aorus X7 v6 B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), TN LED, 17.30, 2560x1440	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	HP Omen 17-w110ng LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080	MSI GT73VR 6RF IPS, 17.30, 3840x2160
Display		2%	3%	5%	11%
Display P3 Coverage	59.6	60.9 2%	64.5 8%	66.6 12%	63.6 7%
sRGB Coverage	82.8	84.2 2%	83.1 0%	84.1 2%	95.8 16%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	60.1	61.2 2%	60.8 1%	61.5 2%	65.7 9%
Response Times		-10%	-75%	-77%	-92%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	21.6 ?(12.4, 9.2)	31 ?(11, 20) -44%	38 ?(16, 22) -76%	37 ?(13, 24) -71%	33.6 ?(13.2, 20.4) -56%
Response Time Black / White *	13.2 ?(4.4, 8.8)	10 ?(3, 7) 24%	23 ?(5, 18) -74%	24 ?(4, 20) -82%	30 ?(5.2, 24.8) -127%
PWM Frequency	59.5
Screen		-5%	13%	21%	13%
Brightness middle	339.5	343 1%	315 -7%	362 7%	334.8 -1%
Brightness	309	312 1%	290 -6%	342 11%	316 2%
Brightness Distribution	80	80 0%	85 6%	87 9%	87 9%
Black Level *	0.45	0.5 -11%	0.32 29%	0.31 31%	0.422 6%
Contrast	754	686 -9%	984 31%	1168 55%	793 5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.88	7.33 -7%	4.88 29%	4.5 35%	4.11 40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.99	10.79 -8%	8.88 11%	9.31 7%	7.8 22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.57	7.6 -16%	4.17 37%	3.48 47%	5.74 13%
Gamma	2.04 ^108%	2.19 ^100%	2.53 ^87%	2.23 ^99%	2.3 ^96%
CCT	8608 ^76%	9024 ^72%	6683 ^97%	6144 ^106%	5987 ^109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	54	55 2%	55 2%	55 2%	60.5 12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	82	84 2%	83 1%	84 2%	96 17%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-4% / -4%	-20% / -1%	-17% / 5%	-23% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.4 ms rise
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.4 ms rise
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

59.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 59.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 59.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 DT v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.92 Points
MSI GT73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.88 Points -2%
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Intel Core i7-6700K	1.72 Points -10%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.69 Points -12%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.56 Points -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6820HK	9.24 Points +1%
Aorus X7 DT v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	9.14 Points
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Intel Core i7-6700K	8.55 Points -6%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.47 Points -18%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.3 Points -20%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 DT v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	169 Points
MSI GT73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6820HK	164 Points -3%
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Intel Core i7-6700K	160 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points -12%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	147 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Intel Core i7-6700K	874 Points +5%
MSI GT73VR 6RF Intel Core i7-6820HK	836 Points 0%
Aorus X7 DT v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	832 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	679 Points -18%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	676 Points -19%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Aorus X7 DT v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	296.6 s *
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Intel Core i7-6700K	205.9 s * +31%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Aorus X7 DT v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	498 s *
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Intel Core i7-6700K	484.6 s * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.92 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

9.14 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

79.5 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

832 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

122.7 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

169 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5096 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	4833 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4651 Points -9%
Eurocom Sky X7E2 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4579 Points -10%
MSI GT73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)	4252 Points -17%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	5394 Points +1%
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5353 Points
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	5011 Points -6%
Eurocom Sky X7E2 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4816 Points -10%
MSI GT73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)	4378 Points -18%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X7E2 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	8576 Points +1%
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	8478 Points
MSI GT73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)	8227 Points -3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	7128 Points -16%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5096 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		8478 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5353 points
Help

	Aorus X7 DT v6 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	HP Omen 17-w110ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	MSI GT73VR 6RF 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)	Eurocom Sky X7E2 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-67%	-38%	-37%	-1%
Read Seq	1829	485.4 -73%	1156 -37%	914 -50%	1673 -9%
Write Seq	1588	312.4 -80%	294.9 -81%	916 -42%	1576 -1%
Read 512	1064	294.8 -72%	616 -42%	698 -34%	1180 11%
Write 512	1507	287.8 -81%	294.7 -80%	916 -39%	1561 4%
Read 4k	52.9	21.44 -59%	42.7 -19%	31.37 -41%	51.5 -3%
Write 4k	161.1	75.7 -53%	153.3 -5%	65.7 -59%	144 -11%
Read 4k QD32	676	149.4 -78%	600 -11%	425 -37%	694 3%
Write 4k QD32	419.1	256.3 -39%	295.3 -30%	441.8 5%	422.1 1%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e

Sequential Read: 1829 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1588 MB/s

512K Read: 1064 MB/s

512K Write: 1507 MB/s

4K Read: 52.9 MB/s

4K Write: 161.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 676 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 419.1 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X7E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K	28321 Points +4%
MSI GT73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK	27685 Points +2%
Aorus X7 DT v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK	27135 Points
Aorus X7 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	23591 Points -13%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	22022 Points -19%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	20656 Points -24%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Aorus X7 DT v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK	10854 Points
Eurocom Sky X7E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K	10419 Points -4%
Aorus X7 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	10344 Points -5%
MSI GT73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK	8705 Points -20%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	8396 Points -23%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	7137 Points -34%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K	125447 Points +3%
Aorus X7 DT v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK	122172 Points
MSI GT73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK	103913 Points -15%
Aorus X7 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	101012 Points -17%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	86780 Points -29%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	64973 Points -47%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X7 DT v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK	21928 Points
Eurocom Sky X7E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K	21781 Points -1%
MSI GT73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK	21270 Points -3%
Aorus X7 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	17068 Points -22%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	16525 Points -25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	15806 Points -28%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Aorus X7 DT v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK	10551 Points
Eurocom Sky X7E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K	10382 Points -2%
MSI GT73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK	10246 Points -3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	7579 Points -28%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K	365079 Points +7%
Aorus X7 DT v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK	340743 Points
MSI GT73VR 6RF NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK	214758 Points -37%
HP Omen 17-w110ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	187717 Points -45%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		34143 points
3DMark 11 Performance		19769 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		169818 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		31695 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		16908 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		9557 points
Help

... in comparison

Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	140.6 fps
Eurocom Sky X7E2 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	147.8 fps +5%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	164.7 fps
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	103.8 (19.8^min - 180.2^max) fps -37%
Eurocom Sky X7E2 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	168.7 fps +2%

Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	130 fps
Eurocom Sky X7E2 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	131.6 fps +1%

Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	125 fps
Eurocom Sky X7E2 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	125.5 fps 0%

Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	141 fps
Eurocom Sky X7E2 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	105 fps -26%

Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	124 fps
Eurocom Sky X7E2 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	133.7 fps +8%

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	118 fps
Aorus X7 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	97 fps -18%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	88.7 fps -25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	89.7 (80^min - 102^max) fps -24%
Eurocom Sky X7E2 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	119.4 fps +1%

Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	153 fps
Aorus X7 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	128 fps -16%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	125.1 fps -18%
HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	116.6 (81^min - 183^max) fps -24%
Eurocom Sky X7E2 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	144.2 fps -6%

Mafia 2 - 1920x1080 high AA:0x AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	214.6 fps

	low	med.	high	ultra
Mafia 2 (2010)				214.6
Sleeping Dogs (2012)				140.6
BioShock Infinite (2013)				164.7
Metro: Last Light (2013)				130
Thief (2014)				125
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)				141
Fallout 4 (2015)				124
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)				118
Doom (2016)				153

Noise Level

Idle		32.2 / 35.2 / 35.2 dB(A)
Load		51.7 / 55.7 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A)

	Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Aorus X7 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	HP Omen 17-w110ng GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	MSI GT73VR 6RF GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
Noise		0%	6%	3%	-1%
off / environment *	28.6	30 -5%	30 -5%	30 -5%	29.2 -2%
Idle Minimum *	32.2	33 -2%	32 1%	33 -2%	32 1%
Idle Average *	35.2	35 1%	33 6%	34 3%	32 9%
Idle Maximum *	35.2	40 -14%	34 3%	35 1%	35 1%
Load Average *	51.7	43 17%	39 25%	45 13%	50 3%
Load Maximum *	55.7	54 3%	51 8%	52 7%	64 -15%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


34.2 °C	45.4 °C	37.2 °C
31.2 °C	36.8 °C	33 °C
27.6 °C	26.6 °C	30.8 °C

Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 33.6 °C


46.8 °C	58.2 °C	40.8 °C
38.6 °C	39.4 °C	36 °C
33 °C	34.2 °C	31.6 °C

Maximum: 58.2 °C
Average: 39.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 53 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.2 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.9 °C / -3.4 F).

Aorus X7 DT v6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	6.6 / 12.6 Watt
Idle	31.5 / 33.9 / 34.6 Watt
Load	205.6 / 250.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Aorus X7 DT v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.30	Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.30	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI GT73VR 6RF 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Power Consumption		10%	33%	31%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	31.5	29 8%	20 37%	19 40%	28.9 8%
Idle Average *	33.9	31 9%	24 29%	25 26%	30.6 10%
Idle Maximum *	34.6	38 -10%	29 16%	31 10%	33.1 4%
Load Average *	205.6	111 46%	86 58%	90 56%	224.4 -9%
Load Maximum *	250.8	253 -1%	183 27%	193 23%	302.6 -21%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		3h 02min
WiFi Websurfing		2h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 34min

	Aorus X7 DT v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94 Wh	Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 62 Wh	HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 95 Wh	MSI GT73VR 6RF 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75.2 Wh
Battery Runtime		26%	11%	77%	25%
Reader / Idle	182		243 34%	432 137%	306 68%
WiFi v1.3	144	182 26%	196 36%	247 72%	198 38%
Load	94		58 -38%	115 22%	65 -31%

Pros

+ 破纪录的显卡性能

+ 超快处理器

+ 出色的存储速度

+ 处理器和显卡都可以便捷地超频

+ 简单强大的风扇速度控制软件

+ 创新冷却系统设计

+ 引人注目（同时相对轻盈）的设计

+ 120赫兹屏幕刷新率，响应速度优秀

+ 出色的键盘

+ 键盘背光和可定义按键

+ 易于维护升级

Cons

- 屏幕有不易察觉的横线

- TN面板一般的可视角度范围和色彩还原

- 负载下噪音较高（使用适当的冷却设定）

- 扬声器较弱

- 电池续航短

傲睿士X7 DT v6是Notebookcheck目前为止测试过最强劲的游戏本之一，而它相比竞争机型也轻盈许多。归功于英伟达GeForce GTX 1080结合未锁频酷睿i7-6820HK的组合，再加上技嘉的出色集成管理软件，傲睿士X7 DT v6可以轻松地在开机时就进入超频。同时，由于搭配了高效创新的散热系统，它在测试中得到了超高的分数：一部分达到了我们的数据库中前所未有的新高度。

它仅凭3.25千克重、30毫米厚的镁合金机身就做到了这一切。X7可以运行你打开的任何游戏，大部分都可以使用最高设定和屏幕的原声分辨率（1440p）。而它的屏幕也是整机的亮点之一，尽管它采用了TN技术，可视角度和色彩准确度一般，但提供了很高的响应速度和120赫兹刷新率，这可以完美匹配显卡带来的高帧率。在这方面最大的问题可能是很多用户会发现的屏幕上的横线，不过这只会在静止情况下出现，在显示电影或游戏等动态内容时则难以察觉。因为这个问题并不严重，X7也适合作为视频编辑的移动工作站。

它的输入设备、工艺品质和机身稳定性也十分出色，相比其他傲睿士产品线中的设备，它就像是一个得到整体升级的产品。它的缺点基本都是一些小细节，或难以避免的情况：它的扬声器较差，使用音效管理工具会让这略有改善。它在负载下也十分吵——不过用户可以通过技嘉的Command&Control软件直接控制它的噪音性能比。最后，由于功耗较高且不支持可切换显卡，它的续航时间很短——不过在购买这类机型时需要考虑电池续航的用户，我们建议重新考虑一下对设备的期待和侧重点。

长话短说，它是目前我们测试过最优秀的游戏本之一。如果你能够接受它的价码的话，应该不会对它失望。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Aorus X7 DT v6 - 2016-12-05 12/05/2016 v6^(old)
Steve Schardein

Chassis

83 / 98 → 85%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

78%

Connectivity

66 / 81 → 81%

Weight

55 / 10-66 → 80%

Battery

65%

Display

82%

Games Performance

100%

Application Performance

96%

Temperature

85 / 95 → 89%

Noise

57 / 90 → 63%

Audio

70%

Camera

65 / 85 → 76%

Add Points

+1%

Average

71%

86%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Steve Schardein - Tech Writer - 98 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

contact me via: @othersteve, LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 傲睿士 X7 DT v6 笔记本电脑简短评测

Steve Schardein, 2016-11-26 (Update: 2020-06- 8)