Notebookcheck

华硕 ROG Zephyrus GX501 笔记本电脑简短评测

Florian Glaser, Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner (translated by Yuchen Wang), 07/01/2017
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Notebook Windows

厌食症 2.0。 华硕又一次推出了最薄的设备。至今为止。这次我们测试的是ROG Zephyrus GX501游戏本。尽管它的厚度只有17.9毫米,这台15寸笔记本电脑搭配了英特尔酷睿i7四核处理器和采用新“Max-Q”设计的英伟达GTX 1080显卡。请阅读我们对这台超薄游戏本的详尽测试了解更多。

Asus Zephyrus GX501 (Zephyrus GX501 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 1227 MHz, Memory: 2500 MHz, GDDR5X, ForceWare 382.22
Memory
24576 MB 
, 8 GB 板载+ 16 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, 双通道
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 120赫兹,G-Sync,全高清, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM175
Storage
Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH, 1024 GB 
, 三星 SM961 固态硬盘 (MZVKW1T0HMLH-00000), 1 TB PCIe 3.0 x4, M.2 Type 2280
Soundcard
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机和麦克风整合接口(3.5毫米), Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17,9 x 379 x 262
Battery
50 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4芯
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: 孤岛式,RGB背光, Keyboard Light: yes, 230瓦电源适配器,质保信息,快速开始说明,螺丝刀,USB 3.0到RJ45以太网转接器,橡胶质感掌托,Strix Impact游戏鼠标, 一些生产商工具软件,XSplit Gamecaster试用版, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.25 kg, Power Supply: 670 g
Price
3000 EUR

 

Size Comparison

Left side: Power, HDMI 2.0, 2x USB 3.0 (1x with charge), 3.5 mm stereo jack
Left side: Power, HDMI 2.0, 2x USB 3.0 (1x with charge), 3.5 mm stereo jack
Right side: Thunderbolt 3 (incl. DisplayPort & USB 3.1 Gen. 2), 2x USB 3.0, slot for Kensington Lock
Right side: Thunderbolt 3 (incl. DisplayPort & USB 3.1 Gen. 2), 2x USB 3.0, slot for Kensington Lock
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
683 MBit/s ∼100%
Alienware 15 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
678 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
674 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
541 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
594 MBit/s ∼100% +44%
Alienware 15 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
560 MBit/s ∼94% +36%
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
513 MBit/s ∼86% +24%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
513 MBit/s ∼86% +24%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
413 MBit/s ∼70%
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
346 MBit/s ∼58% -16%
313
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 328 cd/m² Average: 305 cd/m² Minimum: 37 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 328 cd/m²
Contrast: 1312:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.02 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.32 | - Ø
92% sRGB (Argyll) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.28
Asus Zephyrus GX501
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), 1920x1080
Alienware 15 R3
HPJGK_B156HTN (AUO51ED), 1920x1080
Schenker XMG P507 PRO
AUO B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), 1920x1080
Asus FX502VM-AS73
1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15
N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), 1920x1080
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
3840x2160
Response Times
44%
46%
19%
-20%
17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40.4 (23.2, 17.2)
25 (12, 13)
38%
24 (12, 12)
41%
28.4 (11.2, 17.2)
30%
42.8 (23.6, 19.2)
-6%
28 (15.6, 12.4)
31%
Response Time Black / White *
24 (11.6, 12.4)
12 (4, 8)
50%
12 (4, 8)
50%
22.4 (6, 16.4)
7%
32 (18.8, 13.2)
-33%
23.6 (15.2, 8.4)
2%
PWM Frequency
26000 (20)
1351 (39)
Screen
-24%
-32%
-32%
-5%
-32%
Brightness
305
382
25%
365
20%
205
-33%
316
4%
263
-14%
Brightness Distribution
83
93
12%
85
2%
92
11%
90
8%
92
11%
Black Level *
0.25
0.39
-56%
0.5
-100%
0.69
-176%
0.36
-44%
0.44
-76%
Contrast
1312
990
-25%
714
-46%
304
-77%
889
-32%
623
-53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.02
10.2
-69%
9.93
-65%
4.7
22%
4.62
23%
8
-33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.32
11.28
-78%
10.32
-63%
1.8
72%
6
5%
9.1
-44%
Gamma
2.28 105%
2.23 108%
2.11 114%
2.23 108%
2.46 98%
2.24 107%
CCT
8194 79%
11383 57%
10096 64%
6975 93%
6761 96%
5020 129%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
59
-2%
58
-3%
36.2
-40%
60
0%
45.7
-24%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
90
-2%
89
-3%
56.6
-38%
92
0%
72.1
-22%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
10% / -11%
7% / -17%
-7% / -22%
-13% / -8%
-8% / -22%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.2 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5559 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6015
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
22470
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11462
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.82 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.15 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
67.7 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
160 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
735 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
101 fps
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼99%
Asus Strix GL702VSK
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
148 Points ∼92% -7%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
145 Points ∼90% -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Strix GL702VSK
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼99%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼99% 0%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5846 Points ∼100% +11%
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
5290 Points ∼90% 0%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
5289 Points ∼90%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5088 Points ∼87% -4%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4859 Points ∼83% -8%
Asus Strix GL702VSK
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4782 Points ∼82% -10%
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4680 Points ∼80% -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4648 Points ∼80% -12%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
3550 Points ∼61% -33%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5662 Points ∼100% +12%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5064 Points ∼89% 0%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
5057 Points ∼89%
Asus Strix GL702VSK
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4787 Points ∼85% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD
4248 Points ∼75% -16%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4060 Points ∼72% -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4054 Points ∼72% -20%
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
3770 Points ∼67% -25%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points ∼45% -50%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5057 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5289 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
31412 Points ∼100% +33%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
26438 Points ∼84% +12%
Aorus X7 v6 AO-S107Q716-PL-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6820HK
23633 Points ∼75% 0%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
23540 Points ∼75%
Asus Strix GL702VSK
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22825 Points ∼73% -3%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22704 Points ∼72% -4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22510 Points ∼72% -4%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20656 Points ∼66% -12%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
15075 Points ∼48% -36%
Gigabyte Aero 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
14265 Points ∼45% -39%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
10186 Points ∼32% -57%
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7457 Points ∼24% -68%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
AMD Radeon Pro 555, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5185 Points ∼17% -78%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
1186 Points ∼4% -95%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
23091 Points ∼100% +27%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
21846 Points ∼95% +20%
Aorus X7 v6 AO-S107Q716-PL-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6820HK
18705 Points ∼81% +3%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
18219 Points ∼79%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
17477 Points ∼76% -4%
Asus Strix GL702VSK
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
17131 Points ∼74% -6%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
16847 Points ∼73% -8%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
15806 Points ∼68% -13%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
11730 Points ∼51% -36%
Gigabyte Aero 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
11173 Points ∼48% -39%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8086 Points ∼35% -56%
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
6013 Points ∼26% -67%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
AMD Radeon Pro 555, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3721 Points ∼16% -80%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
735 Points ∼3% -96%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
142135 Points ∼100% +24%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7820HK
132575 Points ∼93% +16%
Aorus X7 v6 AO-S107Q716-PL-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6820HK
119165 Points ∼84% +4%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
114542 Points ∼81%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
97501 Points ∼69% -15%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
94246 Points ∼66% -18%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
86780 Points ∼61% -24%
Gigabyte Aero 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
77755 Points ∼55% -32%
Asus Strix GL702VSK
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
73454 Points ∼52% -36%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-6700HQ
69253 Points ∼49% -40%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
49223 Points ∼35% -57%
Asus ROG Strix GL553VD-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-7700HQ
37840 Points ∼27% -67%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
AMD Radeon Pro 555, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22624 Points ∼16% -80%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
6078 Points ∼4% -95%
3DMark Vantage P Result
39562 points
3DMark 11 Performance
16821 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
140964 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
27935 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14260 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5390 points
Help
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
low med. high ultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 11861.943.7fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 1248848fps
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) 16414455.6fps
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) 74.450.340fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 19717265.7fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 12510543.6fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 928741fps
The Division (2016) 10783.840.8fps
Doom (2016) 13412853.9fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 10697.838.8fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 87.347.929.6fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 13011349fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 13111346.6fps
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) 12311863.7fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 78.266.543.4fps
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) 86.766.734.9fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 16614047.4fps
For Honor (2017) 15511547.9fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 86.751.934.1fps
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) 81.473.235.1fps
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) 888641.9fps
Prey (2017) 13513150.5fps
Rocket League (2017) 235103fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 13688.4fps
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 124125fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (2017) 1251111047927.1fps

Noise Level

Idle
32 / 33 / 34 dB(A)
Load
39 / 46 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
Max. Load
 57 °C56 °C56 °C 
 52 °C54 °C49 °C 
 42 °C41 °C40 °C 
Maximum: 57 °C
Average: 49.7 °C
47 °C46 °C54 °C
42 °C43 °C48 °C
41 °C42 °C42 °C
Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 45 °C
Power Supply (max.)  48 °C | Room Temperature 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.143253338313134.64031.433.75027.529.16327.529.88026.129.710025.828.81252328.316022.541.920022.252.325022.457.931521.464.240019.967.250019.870.763019.774.38001975.110002071125019.268.3160019.168.620001969.5250019.269.2315019.268.8400019.169.4500019.270.663001972.3800019.173.9100001972.71250018.8681600018.659.1SPL31.483N1.659.4median 19.2Asus Zephyrus GX501median 68.8Delta16.640.245.238.242.533.735.740.640.8314232.939.729.931.826.935.825.332.423.935.423.544.525.149.925.354.821.558.820.361.620.165.918.865.518.865.418.667.518.566.318.56618.467.918.570.418.465.818.264.418.36418.268.618.769.718.671.417.964.331.379.11.644.5median 18.7Gigabyte Aero 15median 65.41.66.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus Zephyrus GX501 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 34%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Gigabyte Aero 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.7 / 0.9 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 18 / 23 / 31 Watt
Load midlight 79 / 196 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
3h 08min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
2h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 12min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 44min
In review: ROG Zephyrus GX501. Test model courtesy of Asus Germany.
In review: ROG Zephyrus GX501. Test model courtesy of Asus Germany.

在我们实际使用这台设备一段不长的时间之后,我们已经可以感受到它超薄机身设计带来的一些缺点。它的键盘和GTX 1080 Max-Q显卡都受到了不小的挑战。我们的第一批测试结果显示它的性能更接近高分GTX 1070显卡而非GTX 1080。从我们的角度来看,它的散热系统可以说相对安静,噪音最高值达到了40 dB(A),在接下来的详尽测试后我们将会得到更确切的结果。在屏幕的方面我们也同样需要进一步的测试,尽管它提供了120赫兹刷新率和雾面设计。

目前我们预计它的完整测试将会在下周更新,敬请期待!

(更新:详尽测试已完成!)

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 ROG Zephyrus GX501 笔记本电脑简短评测
Florian Glaser, Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner, 2017-07- 1 (Update: 2017-07- 1)