Notebookcheck

Aorus X5 v6 笔记本电脑简短评测

Allen Ngo (translated by Yuchen Wang), 10/10/2016
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

不对性能作承诺。 独特的Aorus X5携帕斯卡架构显卡回到了我们的视线中,它的独立RGB背光按键,120赫兹/5毫秒全高清屏幕都装在了23毫米厚的机身中。归功于GTX 1070显卡,消费者将会得到和台式机一样的游戏性能,不过噪音也会相对较高。

Aorus X5 v6 (X5 Series)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Core: 1442 MHz, Memory: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 369.26
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4 SDRAM, PC4-19200, G-Skill, 双通道, 1300 MHz, 16-16-16-39
Display
15.6 inch 1:78, 2880 x 1620 pixel 212 PPI, IPS, 型号: Panasonic VVX16T028J00, ID: MEI96A2, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, 256 GB 
, 第二块硬盘: 1 TB HGST HTS721010A9E630
Soundcard
NVIDIA GP104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口(SPDIF输出)和麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD 读卡器
Networking
Qualcomm Killer e2200 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1+LE
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 22.9 x 390 x 272
Battery
94.24 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 1.5 W 扬声器, 2 W 低音炮, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 两个笔记本底架,快速开始说明,质保卡,驱动闪存盘, Killer Network Manager, Aorus Audio Equalizer, Aorus Fusion, Command & Control, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.575 kg, Power Supply: 822 g
Price
2400 USD

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, 2x USB 3.0, 1x HDMI 2.0
Right: SD reader, 2x USB 3.0, 1x HDMI 2.0
Rear: AC adapter, 1x USB 3.0, Gigabit Ethernet
Rear: AC adapter, 1x USB 3.0, Gigabit Ethernet
Left: 1x mDP 1.3, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x audio jack, 1x microphone, 1x USB Type-C Gen. 2
Left: 1x mDP 1.3, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x audio jack, 1x microphone, 1x USB Type-C Gen. 2
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
548.939 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
530.963 MBit/s ∼97% +2%
Aorus X5 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
519.603 MBit/s ∼95%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
549.653 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
545.763 MBit/s ∼99% +7%
Aorus X5 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
511.927 MBit/s ∼93%
266.4
cd/m²
264.7
cd/m²
283.4
cd/m²
244.6
cd/m²
280.4
cd/m²
270.5
cd/m²
245.9
cd/m²
286.8
cd/m²
295.3
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 295.3 cd/m² Average: 270.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 280.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1126:1 (Black: 0.249 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.94 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.13 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
85.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 55.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
Aorus X5 v6
IPS, 15.6, 2880x1620
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
Samsung 156HL01-104 (SDC324C) , IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Gigabyte P35X v5
SHP144E , IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
8%
11%
-24%
16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34 (19, 25)
38 (16, 22)
-12%
51.2 (21.2, 30)
-51%
34 (14, 20)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
32 (8, 24)
23 (5, 18)
28%
26 (8, 18)
19%
39.2 (8.4, 30.8)
-23%
22 (5, 17)
31%
PWM Frequency
198.4
202 (100)
2%
200 (20)
1%
Screen
-2%
6%
-18%
6%
Brightness middle
280.4
315
12%
293
4%
278.9
-1%
273
-3%
Brightness
271
290
7%
279
3%
272
0%
278
3%
Brightness Distribution
83
85
2%
84
1%
80
-4%
88
6%
Black Level *
0.249
0.32
-29%
0.33
-33%
0.562
-126%
0.27
-8%
Contrast
1126
984
-13%
888
-21%
496
-56%
1011
-10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.94
4.88
1%
3.59
27%
4.47
10%
3.67
26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.13
8.88
-9%
5.79
29%
8.64
-6%
8.33
-2%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.13
4.17
19%
3.86
25%
6.13
-19%
2.73
47%
Gamma
2.26 106%
2.53 95%
2.53 95%
2.2 109%
2.49 96%
CCT
7433 87%
6683 97%
7229 90%
7047 92%
7029 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55.9
55
-2%
63
13%
60.87
9%
55
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
85.9
83
-3%
97
13%
95.43
11%
84
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 0%
9% / 7%
-21% / -20%
11% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 198.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10727 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
171 Points ∼83%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
166 Points ∼81% -3%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
149 Points ∼72% -13%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
144 Points ∼70% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
143 Points ∼69% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
143 Points ∼69% -16%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
139 Points ∼67% -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
125 Points ∼61% -27%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
865 Points ∼29% +9%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
790 Points ∼27%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
719 Points ∼24% -9%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
707 Points ∼24% -11%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
669 Points ∼23% -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
490 Points ∼17% -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
348 Points ∼12% -56%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
306 Points ∼10% -61%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.94 Points ∼83%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.91 Points ∼82% -2%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.7 Points ∼73% -12%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.68 Points ∼72% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.63 Points ∼70% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.62 Points ∼69% -16%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.59 Points ∼68% -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.46 Points ∼62% -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
9.56 Points ∼40% +7%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.9 Points ∼37%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.96 Points ∼33% -11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.76 Points ∼32% -13%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.4 Points ∼31% -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
5.29 Points ∼22% -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.84 Points ∼16% -57%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.39 Points ∼14% -62%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
6487 Points ∼60% +2%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
6339 Points ∼59%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
5671 Points ∼52% -11%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5567 Points ∼51% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
5469 Points ∼50% -14%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5055 Points ∼47% -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
4999 Points ∼46% -21%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
26150 Points ∼53% +8%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
24280 Points ∼49%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
21681 Points ∼44% -11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
21022 Points ∼42% -13%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20059 Points ∼40% -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
14329 Points ∼29% -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
10836 Points ∼22% -55%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
323 s * ∼4% -54%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
233.067 s * ∼3% -11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.57 s * ∼3% -7%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
210.349 s * ∼2%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
206.294 s * ∼2% +2%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
178.464 s * ∼2% +15%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635.934 Seconds * ∼3% -31%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
573.691 Seconds * ∼3% -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
569.349 Seconds * ∼3% -17%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
558.605 Seconds * ∼2% -15%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
498.33 Seconds * ∼2% -2%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
486.718 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6782
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
24280
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6339
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
80.79 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.94 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
123.21 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
790 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
5053 Points ∼78%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
5011 Points ∼77% -1%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4924 Points ∼76% -3%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4859 Points ∼75% -4%
Gigabyte P35X v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3999 Points ∼61% -21%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4828 Points ∼79%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4651 Points ∼76% -4%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4541 Points ∼75% -6%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4060 Points ∼67% -16%
Gigabyte P35X v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3301 Points ∼54% -32%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4828 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7973 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5053 points
Help
Aorus X5 v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Gigabyte P35X v5
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-64%
-1%
-70%
11%
Write 4k QD32
358.7
256.3
-29%
385.5
7%
167.1
-53%
422.1
18%
Read 4k QD32
687.9
149.4
-78%
592.7
-14%
251.6
-63%
693.5
1%
Write 4k
158.8
75.74
-52%
145.1
-9%
42.51
-73%
144
-9%
Read 4k
52.95
21.44
-60%
51.42
-3%
20.3
-62%
51.54
-3%
Write 512
1221
287.8
-76%
1214
-1%
254.4
-79%
1561
28%
Read 512
989.5
294.8
-70%
1119
13%
242.3
-76%
1180
19%
Write Seq
1275
312.4
-75%
1247
-2%
319
-75%
1576
24%
Read Seq
1565
485.4
-69%
1541
-2%
334.3
-79%
1673
7%
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Sequential Read: 1565 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1275 MB/s
512K Read: 989.5 MB/s
512K Write: 1221 MB/s
4K Read: 52.95 MB/s
4K Write: 158.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 687.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 358.7 MB/s
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
5120 Points ∼51% +22%
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
4191 Points ∼41%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
4126 Points ∼41% -2%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
3009 Points ∼30% -28%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
2592 Points ∼26% -38%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
2326 Points ∼23% -45%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
10382 Points ∼52% +21%
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
8556 Points ∼43%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
6123 Points ∼31% -28%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
5541 Points ∼28% -35%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
4663 Points ∼23% -46%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
21781 Points ∼54% +22%
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
17869 Points ∼44%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
16685 Points ∼41% -7%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
13018 Points ∼32% -27%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
11957 Points ∼29% -33%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9820 Points ∼24% -45%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
11482 Points ∼65% +10%
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
10423 Points ∼59%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
10419 Points ∼59% 0%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9256 Points ∼53% -11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
9017 Points ∼51% -13%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
8338 Points ∼47% -20%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
28321 Points ∼56% +19%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
23990 Points ∼47% +1%
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
23723 Points ∼47%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
16946 Points ∼33% -29%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
12890 Points ∼25% -46%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
12731 Points ∼25% -46%
3DMark 11 Performance
18156 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
144778 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30162 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14476 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
7857 points
Help
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
111.3 fps ∼100%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
79.3 fps ∼71% -29%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
71.6 fps ∼64% -36%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
55.5 fps ∼50% -50%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
43.5 fps ∼39% -61%
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
118.6 fps ∼100%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
75.2 fps ∼63% -37%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
59.5 fps ∼50% -50%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
44.9 fps ∼38% -62%
Guild Wars 2 - 1920x1080 All Maximum / On AA:FX
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
78.8 fps ∼100%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
52.9 fps ∼67% -33%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
136.8 fps ∼100%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
106.2 fps ∼78% -22%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
105.5 fps ∼77% -23%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
90.2 fps ∼66% -34%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
69.5 fps ∼51% -49%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
117.9 fps ∼100%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
88.3 fps ∼75% -25%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
82.1 fps ∼70% -30%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
69.7 fps ∼59% -41%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
50.5 fps ∼43% -57%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
106.6 fps ∼100%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
72.4 fps ∼68% -32%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
67.9 fps ∼64% -36%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
63.7 fps ∼60% -40%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
47.5 fps ∼45% -55%
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
89 fps ∼100%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
63 fps ∼71% -29%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
62 fps ∼70% -30%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
50 fps ∼56% -44%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
36 fps ∼40% -60%
Metal Gear Solid V - 1920x1080 Extra High / On
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
60 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
60 fps ∼100%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
97.4 fps ∼100%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
63.5 fps ∼65% -35%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
60.4 fps ∼62% -38%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
54.7 fps ∼56% -44%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps ∼44% -56%
Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
128.9 fps ∼100%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
96.5 fps ∼75% -25%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
84.3 fps ∼65% -35%
Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
162 fps ∼100%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
118.2 fps ∼73% -27%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
106.3 fps ∼66% -34%
low med. high ultra
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 118.6fps
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 78.8fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 136.8fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 117.9fps
Thief (2014) 106.6fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 89fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 111.3fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 97.4fps
Doom (2016) 128.9fps
Overwatch (2016) 162fps

Noise Level

Idle
33.4 / 35.2 / 35.2 dB(A)
Load
53.3 / 57.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29.3 dB(A)
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
Noise
8%
9%
10%
11%
off / environment *
29.3
30
-2%
30
-2%
30
-2%
Idle Minimum *
33.4
32
4%
32
4%
32
4%
31
7%
Idle Average *
35.2
33
6%
33
6%
33
6%
32
9%
Idle Maximum *
35.2
34
3%
34
3%
34
3%
36
-2%
Load Average *
53.3
39
27%
40
25%
37
31%
40
25%
Load Maximum *
57.6
51
11%
46
20%
46
20%
47
18%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 45.6 °C57 °C38.8 °C 
 36.8 °C46.8 °C34 °C 
 33 °C28.2 °C26.6 °C 
Maximum: 57 °C
Average: 38.5 °C
46.4 °C48.8 °C54 °C
38.6 °C47.2 °C50.4 °C
34 °C39.2 °C39.4 °C
Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 44.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  55.6 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
The maximum temp on the upper side is 57 °C, compared to the average of 35.9 °C ranging from 21.1 °C to 71 °C for class Gaming.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.2402535.136.33134.837.14033.1345031.632.56332.1348032.33510032.634.112531.834.216030.940.620028.446.625027.848.531527.75240026.556.550025.557.563026.857.880026.556.8100025.154.6125024.859.5160025.659.5200023.951250023.953.2315023.95940002659.450002462.5630023.565.480002363.81000023.164125002361.8160002352.1SPL3772.3N2.929.9median 25.5Aorus X5 v6median 56.8Delta2.15.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Aorus X5 v6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.31 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 0.85 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 25 / 28.9 / 30.1 Watt
Load midlight 167.3 / 222.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 2880x1620, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus G701VO-CS74K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
12%
9%
7%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
25
24.3
3%
24.4
2%
22.3
11%
28.2
-13%
Idle Average *
28.9
29.6
-2%
26.6
8%
27.3
6%
32
-11%
Idle Maximum *
30.1
29.9
1%
36.4
-21%
30
-0%
32.6
-8%
Load Average *
167.3
110.1
34%
117
30%
152.2
9%
162.2
3%
Load Maximum *
222.6
171.4
23%
163.6
27%
204.2
8%
173.5
22%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
4h 9min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 40min
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 62 Wh
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.24 Wh
Gigabyte P35X v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, 76 Wh
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M,  Wh
Battery Runtime
-12%
17%
28%
162%
Reader / Idle
249
243
-2%
300
20%
345
39%
WiFi v1.3
182
196
8%
246
35%
261
43%
476
162%
Load
100
58
-42%
97
-3%
101
1%

Pros

+ 4个内存槽,4个硬盘槽,2个HDMI 2.0接口
+ 很强的性能;可超频处理器和显卡
+ 高sRGB色域覆盖;高品质WQHD+面板
+ 120赫兹/5毫秒全高清或WQHD+屏幕升级选项
+ 时尚的设计;轻薄便携
+ 独立可编程按键
+ 大尺寸触控板
+ 功能丰富的Aorus工具软件
+ 支持NVMe和RAID
+ 独立RGB背光按键
+ 易于维护
+ 坚固的底座

Cons

- 测试机存在电流声和屏幕漏光问题
- 在极端负载下处理器略有降频
- 高功耗;一般的电池续航
- 在所有亮度范围都使用屏幕闪烁亮度控制
- 略显不均匀的键盘背光
- Aorus工具软件偶尔反应较慢
- 不支持Thunderbolt 3;无VGA接口
- 负载下风扇噪音大
- 板载显卡;非MXM 3.0插槽
- 系统风扇一直开启
- 左侧无USB接口
- 屏幕上盖和转轴显得比较脆弱
- 易沾染指纹
In review: Aorus X5 v6. Test model provided by Aorus.
In review: Aorus X5 v6. Test model provided by Aorus.

Aorus通过把强劲硬件放进同配置机型一半厚的机身内而在游戏市场上得到了一席之地。X5 v6甚至提供了竞争机型中少见的功能组合:3K 1620p屏幕,双HDMI 2.0接口和为方便直播的内置硬件。那么当存在搭配同样处理器和显卡却相对更薄的Aorus时,为什么还要购买更笨重的机型呢?

答案与性能和功能的关系比较小,而更多是关于风扇噪音的问题。我们测试机中的GTX 1070显卡和台式GTX 1070标准卡速度相当,因此它并没有过热降频的问题。而120赫兹/5毫秒屏幕选项,独立背光按键,四个支持RAID的硬盘槽,和方便的维护升级都让X5 v6在其他超薄游戏本中脱颖而出。另外,不常见的WQHD屏幕相比4K屏幕更接近于GTX 1070的性能表现。

它的系统噪音是最大的缺点所在。它的风扇非常吵人,如果不戴耳机的话在MGS V等较为安静的游戏中将会带来很大的问题。其他的小缺陷还包括一般的电池续航,所有亮度下的屏幕闪烁,缺少Thunderbolt 3和MXM 3.0,以及极端情况下的处理器降频。同时它的功耗表现也十分奇怪(搭配200瓦电源适配器,功耗却大于200瓦),另外我们所测试过的一台搭配更便宜的酷睿i7-6700HQ处理器的机型性能表现也十分相近。

非常便携的Aorus X5 v6是一台全面的游戏笔记本电脑,它可以适合骨灰级游戏玩家和游戏直播,提供了丰富的功能。和其他轻薄游戏本相似,它的最大缺陷也是来自于风扇噪音。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Aorus X5 v6 - 10/08/2016 v5.1
Allen Ngo

Chassis
80 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
60 / 81 → 75%
Weight
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Battery
69%
Display
83%
Games Performance
98%
Application Performance
97%
Temperature
82 / 95 → 86%
Noise
54 / 90 → 60%
Audio
80%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Average
76%
83%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Aorus X5 v6 笔记本电脑简短评测
Allen Ngo, 2016-10-10 (Update: 2016-10-15)