Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 评测:速度更快,配备 Wi-Fi 6E
MacBook Air M2 MacBook Air M2MacBook Air M21.5 年前,Apple 推出了全新设计的 MacBook Air M2。与此同时,该系列又增加了一个 15 英寸机型。去年年底,Apple ,在 MacBook Pro 机型中推出了全新的 M3-SoC 代产品,现在 MacBook Air 13 的 M3 更新也紧随其后。不出所料,MacBook Air 13 的设计没有太大变化,但它现在也支持 Wi-Fi 6E。
旧款 MacBook Air 13 M2 仍可购买(MRSP:999 美元起),取代了旧款 MacBook Air M1取代旧款 MacBook Air M1 成为制造商最便宜的 MacBook。新款 MacBook Air M3 售价 1099 美元起,比上市时的 M2 便宜 200 美元。不过,它仍然只配备了 8GB 内存和 256GB 固态硬盘。我们的测试机是配备更快的 10 核 GPU、16 GB 内存和 512GB SSD 的机型,售价为 1,499 美元。由于该设备在许多方面没有变化,我们建议大家看看我们以前对 MacBook Air M2 的评测以及对 M3 SoC 的分析:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
92.4 % | 03/2024 | Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 | |
92 % | 08/2022 | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 | |
86.7 % | 02/2024 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.5 % | 01/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 13.99 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 | |
91.9 % | 07/2023 | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.1 kg | 16.3 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 | |
87.4 % | 07/2023 | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" | 3456x2160 | |
89.6 % | 06/2023 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.20" | 3120x2080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 全新涂层的午夜 MacBook
总的来说,MacBook Air 13 的设计和外壳质量没有任何变化。与旧款 MacBook Air M1 相比,目前的设计没有使用楔形底座。在实际使用中,尽管前缘较硬,但这并不是问题,因为底座太平了,不会对手腕造成困扰。它的构造依然出色,稳定性也同样出色。其最大开启角度为 135 度。
随着 M2 代的发布,Apple 扩展了其著名的银色和太空灰配色,增加了两种新的选择:星光色和午夜色。深蓝色的 "午夜 "在产品照片上看起来特别漂亮,但很快就变成了指纹磁铁,几乎不可能保持表面清洁。随后,新的 M3 机型(午夜版)采用了阳极氧化涂层--与 MacBook Pro 14/16 的黑色版本相同--以帮助缓解这一问题。因此,指纹印的问题大大减少。与黑色 MBP 14 的情况一样,指纹痕迹在使用较长时间后确实会变得明显,但使用抹布清洁表面要容易得多。
MacBook Air 13 厚度为 11.3 毫米,依然非常纤薄,其占地面积比戴尔 XPS 13 或 ThinkPad Z13 要大得多,几乎与 Zenbook 14 OLED 等 14 英寸设备相当。它的重量为 1.237 千克,35 瓦电源(带 2 个 USB-C)重 184 克,包括 MagSafe 电缆。
我们还添加了一些与较大型 MacBook Air 15 M3 的对比照片。 MacBook Air 15 M3的对比照片,让你更直观地了解它的尺寸。
连接性 - 现在支持两个外部显示器
在连接选项方面,没有任何变化,除了电源的 MagSafe 连接外,它的左侧仍然有两个 USB-C 端口(4.0),这两个端口仍然只支持 Thunderbolt 3。右侧只有 3.5 毫米音频插孔,我们希望至少能再看到一个 USB 接口。
但有一项功能是全新的,因为以前的 MacBook Air M2除了内置面板外,只能为一台外接显示器供电。M3 SoC 的硬件要求完全相同,因此仍然只能控制两台显示器,但如果合上屏幕盖,现在也可以使用两台外接显示器(1 台最高 6K/60Hz,1 台最高 5K/60Hz)。当然,这仍然不是完全理想,但这显然是朝着正确方向迈出的一步,如果你想使用两台显示器,这将会带来很大的不同。
我们用两个外接显示器(一个通过 USB-C,另一个通过 USB-C/HDMI 适配器)测试了新功能,效果非常好。屏幕 MacBook Pro 14 M3也将在晚些时候通过软件更新获得这一功能。
交流
Apple 新款 MacBook Air M3 更新了 WLAN 模块,现在可支持频率为 160 MHz 的 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3。结合我们的华硕参考路由器,你可以立即看到效果,新款 MacBook Air M3 的速度是前代产品的两倍。 的两倍与较大的 MacBook Pro 机型一样快。
Networking | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
网络摄像头
它的 1080p 网络摄像头在光线条件良好的情况下仍能拍摄出不错的照片,我们对它的麦克风也毫无怨言。你还可以选择将 iPhone 用作网络摄像头。
维护
只要有一把合适的五角螺丝刀,底盖就可以拆卸下来。不过,由于没有风扇,而且所有元件都是焊接上去的,所以您可以省去这些麻烦。必要时可以更换粘在一起的电池,但只能由合格的维修人员进行。
输入设备 - 超强触控板
在输入设备方面,与 MacBook Air M2 相比没有任何变化。键盘的质量并没有达到商务笔记本电脑的标准,但总的来说,它很精确,在上面打字感觉很舒适。它的 Touch-ID 指纹扫描仪运行完美,而在白色键盘背光方面,Apple 多年来一直处于领先地位,因为它可以根据周围环境光线非常精确地自动调节强度。
它的超大触控板仍然是移动设备中的佼佼者,与 macOS 的集成也完美无瑕。由于采用了 Force Touch 技术,整个触控板上的点击都很均匀,声音也不大。此外,手势输入也非常完美。一如既往,MacBook Air 并不配备触摸屏。
显示屏 - P3 覆盖的 IPS
Apple Air 继续采用 13.6 英寸 IPS 屏幕。其分辨率为 2,560 x 1,664 像素,略有偏差。额外的 64 个垂直像素用于凹槽旁边的区域。一如既往,它看起来并不是最好的,但也没有占用实际 16:10 面板的任何空间。
主观而言,该面板的画质依然令人印象深刻。此外,macOS 仍然没有显示缩放问题。不过,由于该机型采用的仍是 60 赫兹面板,我们希望它能升级到 120 赫兹。它的响应时间不算特别快,但也不明显偏慢--在日常使用中,你不会注意到任何重影现象。它不使用 PWM,屏幕亮度和色温会根据环境光线自动调整。
我们在屏幕中间测得的最大亮度为 525 cd/m²,平均亮度略高于 500 cd/m²。遗憾的是,显示屏的黑色值 0.42 cd/m² 偏高,导致与 OLED 或 Mini-LED 面板相比,暗色内容看起来并非全黑。这也体现在屏幕的对比度上,"只有"~1,300:1。我们注意到,在高亮度水平下描绘暗色图像时,边角会出现一些背光出血现象。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 525 cd/m²
Contrast: 1250:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
87.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU IPS, 2560x1664, 13.60 | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry IPS, 2560x1664, 13.60 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA ATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 ATNA33AA02-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30 | HP Dragonfly G4 Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.50 | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P Samsung 134XK04, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.20 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 4% | 4% | -17% | 4% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.4 | 98.4 0% | 99.8 1% | 99.7 1% | 68.4 -30% | 99.7 1% | 89.8 -9% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 98.3 -2% | 100 0% | 99.4 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 87.9 | 87.6 0% | 97.6 11% | 97.3 11% | 70.4 -20% | 96.8 10% | 84.2 -4% |
Response Times | 7% | 98% | 93% | -28% | 93% | 58% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34.5 ? | 32.9 ? 5% | 0.69 ? 98% | 2.1 ? 94% | 48.8 ? -41% | 2.18 ? 94% | 20 ? 42% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 24.9 ? 8% | 0.71 ? 97% | 2.2 ? 92% | 31.3 ? -15% | 2.08 ? 92% | 7 ? 74% |
PWM Frequency | 480 ? | 60.1 ? | 238.6 ? | 156000 ? | |||
Screen | 3% | 198% | 3% | -14% | -87% | -10% | |
Brightness middle | 525 | 526 0% | 391 -26% | 372 -29% | 408.8 -22% | 361.7 -31% | 595 13% |
Brightness | 506 | 486 -4% | 392 -23% | 375 -26% | 399 -21% | 367 -27% | 550 9% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 87 -5% | 98 7% | 99 8% | 90 -2% | 96 4% | 85 -8% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.38 10% | 0.02 95% | 0.32 24% | 0.25 40% | ||
Contrast | 1250 | 1384 11% | 19550 1464% | 1278 2% | 2380 90% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.3 7% | 1.1 21% | 0.88 37% | 2.02 -44% | 4.83 -245% | 2.01 -44% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.8 | 2.7 4% | 2.4 14% | 3.22 -15% | 3.84 -37% | 9.34 -234% | 6.9 -146% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2 -0% | 1.3 35% | 1.2 40% | 2.3 -15% | 1.8 10% | 2.74 -37% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.18 101% | 2.2 100% | 2.33 94% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 6876 95% | 6858 95% | 6336 103% | 6326 103% | 6203 105% | 6438 101% | 6319 103% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.7 | 0.61 | 3.97 | 1.22 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
3% | 100% /
138% | 33% /
19% | -20% /
-17% | 3% /
-30% | 14% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
不过,我们使用专业 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)进行分析后发现,该面板的色调略微偏蓝,色温也略微偏低。使用我们自己的校准软件(可在上面免费下载相应的配置文件),我们成功地控制了这两个问题,进一步降低了总偏差。反过来,其最大亮度也降低了约 25 cd/m²。完全覆盖 P3 色彩空间。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.5 ms rise | |
↘ 11.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 65 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
34.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.9 ms rise | |
↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
虽然 Macbook Air 的显示屏一般都很光亮,但它不像大多数采用 OLED 面板或触摸屏的 Windows 笔记本电脑那样反光。因此,只要避免阳光直射,你仍然可以在明亮的环境中工作。它的视角稳定性非常好。
性能 - 3 纳米 M3 SoC
MacBook Air 13 有两种不同的 M3 SoC 可供选择。配备 8 个内核的 CPU 部分完全相同,而基本型号则继续配备 8 个 GPU 内核,并可选择配备速度更快的 10 核 GPU,这在 MacBook Pro 14 M3.你可以选择 8、16 或 24 GB 内存。顺便说一句,电源的选择不会对设备的性能产生任何影响。
处理器 -Apple M3,3 纳米制程
M3 SoC Apple M3 SoC是Apple 首款采用 3 纳米工艺制造的芯片。其核心配置与旧版 M2 SoC但得益于制造工艺的改进,Apple 在不增加能耗的情况下提高了时钟频率。现在,它的四个性能内核最高主频可达 4.056 GHz(或所有内核加载时约为 3.6 GHz),四个效率内核最高主频可达 2.748 GHz。在多核测试中,该处理器的功耗曾一度达到约 21 瓦,之后稳步下降,在 12 分钟的连续负载中达到 10.5 瓦(R23 Multi:8237 点,因此降低约 19%)。总体而言,它在短时间测试中的表现与 MacBook Pro 14 M3的性能保持稳定,这要归功于其主动散热系统。
与旧版 M2 SoC 相比,其性能平均提高了约 20%。这意味着 M3 SoC 的性能略低于 Ryzen 7 7840U或 酷睿至尊 7 155H的水平。 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12不过,这两种机型的能耗也更高。
在单核测试中,Apple 的性能比 M2 提高了 20%,在 AMD 和英特尔的竞争中拔得头筹。这些成绩令人印象深刻,尤其是考虑到其单核能耗仅为 5 瓦多。我们已经在的分析文章中介绍了新款 M3 SoC 的效率。 在电池使用情况下,MacBook Air 13 M3 的 CPU 性能保持不变。更多 CPU 基准测试请访问。
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Apple M3 | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average of class Subnotebook (366 - 902, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M3 (576 - 712, n=3) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Apple M3 |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M3 | |
Average Apple M3 (140 - 142, n=3) | |
Apple M3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (90 - 142, n=9, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M2 Pro | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Apple M3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M3 (10074 - 10454, n=3) | |
Apple M3 | |
Apple M2 | |
Intel Core i7-1365U |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Apple M3 | |
Average Apple M3 (1900 - 1904, n=3) | |
Apple M3 | |
Intel Core i7-1365U | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Apple M2 Pro | |
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Apple M2 |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Apple M3 | |
Average Apple M3 (11863 - 12066, n=4) | |
Apple M3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6796 - 13217, n=26, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Apple M3 | |
Average Apple M3 (3026 - 3130, n=4) | |
Apple M3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2003 - 3130, n=26, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Apple M2 Pro | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Apple M3 | |
Apple M3 | |
Average Apple M3 (10570 - 10774, n=3) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Apple M2 | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core i7-1365U |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Apple M3 | |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core | |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core | |
Average Apple M3 (2256 - 2350, n=3) | |
Apple M3 | |
Apple M2 Pro | |
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core | |
Apple M2 | |
Intel Core i7-1365U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average of class Subnotebook (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
系统性能
旧款 MacBook Air M2在日常使用中已经是一款超快的设备,新的 M3 SoC 也是如此。特别是在运行本地应用程序时,它的性能非常出色,在合成基准测试中,新款 MacBook Air 13 M3 几乎总是领先于 Windows 系统的竞争对手。
基于英特尔处理器的 Mac 应用程序可以通过 Rosetta 2 进行模拟,效果非常好。速度上可能会有些许差异(尤其是在复杂的应用程序中),但总的来说,运行绝对良好。目前,围绕人工智能的话题已是大势所趋,Apple ,自M1 芯片发布以来,它也已安装了神经引擎形式的 NPU 。例如,它可用于在撰写信息时预测单词。如果您喜欢使用包括 Co-Pilot 在内的微软办公套件,那么您不必担心,因为这项功能是通过云提供的,这意味着与 Windows 设备没有任何区别。
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Jetstream 2: Total Score
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (1847 - 1857, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (1716 - 1729, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (2183 - 2210, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (1364 - 1367, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (423 - 448, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (119.2 - 448, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (313 - 315, n=2) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (67.2 - 325, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1913, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (363 - 373, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 |
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (305 - 318, n=3) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.4 - 478, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
正如 MacBook Pro 14 M3Apple ,MacBook Air 13 M3 继续只配备 PCIe-3.0 固态硬盘。我们的测试设备安装的是 512GB 版本(AP0512Z),其传输速率符合预期,即 ~3.5 GB/s。因此,在日常使用中不会遇到任何限制。我们预计 256GB 型号的性能会更低(约为 50%),我们将尽快进行检查。首次启动设备后,用户有 465 GB 的可用空间。Air M3 最多可安装 2 TB 的固态硬盘。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。
图形卡
我们的测试样品安装了 10 核的 M3 GPU,我们已经从 MacBook Pro 14 M3 上了解到这一点。它的最大功耗约为 15 瓦,总的来说,其性能与 MacBook Pro 处于同一水平,尽管 Air 在长期负载情况下也会减速。在 3DMark WildLife-Extreme 压力测试中,运行 20 次后,Air 的成绩下降了约 25%。其 GPU 性能也比拥有 10 个内核的旧款 M2 GPU 高出 20%。在电池使用情况下,它的图形性能保持不变,更多基准测试可参见 这里.
MacBook 上的游戏速度正在慢慢加快,《全面战争:法老王》或《博德之门 3》等游戏都能在 MacBook 上原生运行。不过,《博德之门 3》对高细节的要求太高,所以你必须激活 FSR,才能在 1080p/High 下达到约 35fps。说到 FSR,你至少应该选择设置质量,因为如果不这样做,笔记本的图形性能就会大打折扣。古墓丽影》或 Witcher 3 等模拟游戏也可以在 MacBook 上运行,但根据游戏的不同,可能会有一些限制,其性能也会受到一些限制。
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
Average of class Subnotebook (129 - 237, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (121 - 134, n=3) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1176 - 1237, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 |
* ... smaller is better
low | med. | high | ultra | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 36 | 24 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 103 | 38 | 34 | 30 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 31 | 26 | 21 | 19 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 123 | 67 | 43 | 28 |
废气排放 - MacBook Air 始终悄无声息
噪音排放
MacBook Air 13 与速度类似的 Windows 系统同类产品相比,最大的优势仍然是它的被动散热。无论你在设备上做什么(甚至在为两台外接显示器供电时),它始终保持静音,不会发出任何电子噪音。
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP1024Z | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | ||||||||
off / environment * | 23.4 | 25.1 | 23.3 | 23.7 | 25.4 | 24.2 | ||
Idle Minimum * | 23.4 | 25.8 | 23.5 | 24 | 25.4 | 24.2 | ||
Idle Average * | 23.4 | 25.8 | 23.5 | 24 | 25.4 | 24.2 | ||
Idle Maximum * | 24.5 | 28.3 | 26.8 | 24.4 | 29.6 | 24.2 | ||
Load Average * | 39.3 | 28.3 | 27.2 | 37 | 42 | 25.1 | ||
Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.9 | 44.8 | 32.7 | 42.1 | 25.1 | |||
Load Maximum * | 39.3 | 44.8 | 35 | 42 | 40.9 | 48.5 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管采用了被动散热技术,Apple 仍然能控制机箱温度,在空闲模式下/执行简单任务时,设备几乎不会发热。在一小时的压力测试后,我们注意到在底座顶部和底部的中间区域有一个 44°C 的热点。当然,这很明显,但不会限制笔记本电脑的使用。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.8 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.9 °C / 91.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.6 °C / -8.3 F).
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -8% | -5% | -6% | -9% | -6% | -29% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.3 | 44.7 -1% | 40.9 8% | 46.2 -4% | 38.6 13% | 43.8 1% | 46.5 -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.4 | 44.6 -3% | 46.8 -8% | 48.4 -12% | 40.4 7% | 44.4 -2% | 44.7 -3% |
Idle Upper Side * | 22.3 | 25.1 -13% | 24.1 -8% | 23.2 -4% | 28.2 -26% | 24 -8% | 34.9 -57% |
Idle Bottom * | 22.1 | 25.3 -14% | 24.6 -11% | 23 -4% | 29 -31% | 25.2 -14% | 32.9 -49% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试中,M3 SoC 的功耗曾一度高达 33 瓦,但随后迅速下降。在此 MacBook Pro 14 M3凭借其主动散热器占据了明显的优势,尽管它也无法长时间保持最大值。
在 CPU/GPU 负载情况下,处理器的功耗平衡在 8.5-9 瓦左右,与前代产品相同。不过,在新款 MacBook Air M3 中,GPU 被放在了优先位置。
发言人
鉴于该设备的底座很薄,配备四个扬声器的音响系统仍能提供非常好的音效,在很多情况下,你甚至不需要外接扬声器。不过,较大型 MacBook Pro 的音响系统更加出色,而 Windows 系统的竞争产品(如 华硕 Zenbook 14或 惠普蜻蜓 G4)也赶上了 MacBook Air,在某些情况下甚至超过了 MacBook Air。
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Dragonfly G4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 电池寿命长
耗电量
在全亮度下空转时,MacBook Air 13 M3 比前代产品略显节俭。 略显节俭。在负载情况下,35 瓦的电源仍然是限制因素。在使用功率更大的 65 瓦电源时,我们测得的短时间峰值功耗为 66 瓦,几分钟后功耗下降,低于 35 瓦。在接下来的过程中,其消耗平衡在 23 瓦左右。在这种情况下使用 35 瓦的电源时,为了满足额外的电力需求,最终需要使用电池。不幸的是,目前几乎所有英特尔子笔记本电脑都存在这个问题。
Off / Standby | 0.17 / 0.31 Watt |
Idle | 1.95 / 8.7 / 8.9 Watt |
Load |
34.3 / 35.4 Watt |
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.60 | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.60 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30 | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.50 | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40 | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 3120x2080, 14.20 | Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | -73% | -59% | -35% | -78% | -67% | -17% | -57% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.95 | 1.9 3% | 6.1 -213% | 5.8 -197% | 4.1 -110% | 6.9 -254% | 4.1 -110% | 2.1 ? -8% | 4.86 ? -149% |
Idle Average * | 8.7 | 9.6 -10% | 10 -15% | 6.2 29% | 7.5 14% | 7.4 15% | 6.6 24% | 10.6 ? -22% | 8.31 ? 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.9 | 9.7 -9% | 10.3 -16% | 12.7 -43% | 8.2 8% | 13.6 -53% | 8 10% | 10.9 ? -22% | 10.4 ? -17% |
Load Average * | 34.3 | 32.4 6% | 53.3 -55% | 27.2 21% | 35.5 -3% | 43.5 -27% | 61 -78% | 35.5 ? -3% | 46.3 ? -35% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 28.6 | 30.8 -8% | 42 -47% | 54.1 -89% | 37.5 -31% | 48 -68% | 56 -96% | ||
Load Maximum * | 35.4 | 35.7 -1% | 67 -89% | 61.4 -73% | 66.5 -88% | 63.3 -79% | 90 -154% | 46.4 ? -31% | 66.7 ? -88% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
其 56.2 Wh 的电池容量保持不变,我们在电池测试中也看到了类似的结果。在 WLAN 测试中,亮度调整为 150 cd/m²(比最大亮度降低了 7 级大亮度和 2 级小亮度),我们测得的时间略高于 15 小时,这意味着它比前一代 M2 多用了半小时。惠普 惠普蜻蜓 G4的电池容量更大,续航时间也长了 40 分钟,而所有其他 Windows 竞争对手都落在后面。在全屏亮度下,WLAN 测试仅持续了约 7 个小时,比旧款机型多 1 个小时(这也与较低的闲置耗电量相吻合)。我们将尽快提供其他电池测试的结果。
MacBook Air 的电池充电速度仍然不是特别快,使用 35 瓦的电源,在开机状态下充电需要约 2.5 小时。在我们对 MacBook Air M2 的
评测中,我们增加了使用不同电源对其充电时间的测试结果。<br />Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3, M3 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 75 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, 51.5 Wh | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -6% | -16% | -49% | 8% | -52% | -38% | -29% | |
H.264 | 1044 | 946 -9% | 1010 -3% | 527 -50% | 794 ? -24% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 914 | 884 -3% | 707 -23% | 469 -49% | 954 4% | 436 -52% | 580 -37% | 629 ? -31% |
Load | 171 | 134 -22% | 192 12% | 124 -27% | 115.4 ? -33% |
Pros
Cons
结论:配备 M3 SoC 的 MacBook Air 13 更胜一筹
之后 MacBook Pro 14在去年年底发布了配备全新 M3 SoC 的 MacBook Pro 14 之后,我们已经知道了 MacBook Air M3 的预期。由于新的 3 纳米芯片的功耗与 M2 SoC 基本相同,因此 MacBook Air 也能充分发挥新 M3 的潜力,比 M2 领先 20%。
虽然被动散热会导致笔记本电脑在长期负载时性能略有下降(约 20%),但这是当前英特尔机型的常态(至少在多核性能方面),即使采用主动散热也是如此。另一方面,其出色的单核性能保持不变,在这方面,Apple ,能够将竞争对手--AMD Ryzen-8000 处理器和英特尔流星湖芯片--甩在身后。而这一切都发生在一个被动冷却的设备中。目前,还没有同类的 Windows 替代产品能提供如此强劲的性能,同时又没有恼人的风扇噪音。
即使在其他方面,MacBook Air M3 也没有出现任何重大失误。由于配备了 Wi-Fi 6E(160 MHz),Apple ,MacBook Air M3 在 WLAN 性能方面迎头赶上。虽然缺少 Thunderbolt 4 在日常使用中应该比左侧仅限于 2x USB-C 的问题要小一些,但它的连接情况可能是该设备的主要缺陷。一如既往,它的运行时间令人震惊,即使 Windows 竞争对手正在慢慢追赶Apple 。带有两个 USB-C 端口的 35 瓦电源可能比较实用,但如果你想充分发挥 M3 的潜力,它的功率实际上略显不足。它的性能不会受到影响,但不足的部分确实要由笔记本电脑的电池吸收几分钟。现在,新的午夜色机身上多了一层涂层,使其不再像以前那样容易沾染指纹。
更好的性能和更快的无线局域网:有了新的 M3 SoC,Apple ,MacBook Air 13 变得更加出色,没有任何 Windows 替代产品能提供更好的整体解决方案。静音运行尤其是 MacBook Air 的一大优势。
该设备的 13.6 英寸 IPS 面板继续提供色彩准确、亮度水平良好的画质,但我们希望能慢慢看到它升级到 120 Hz。不过,与 Mini-LED 和 OLED 面板相比,它的优势在于无需使用 PWM。如果关上显示屏盖子,新款 Air M3 现在还能容纳两台外接显示器。当然,这并不理想,但对于希望在办公桌上使用两台显示器的用户来说,这可能很有用。它最大的问题仍然是价格,1099 美元的售价仍然只有 8GB 内存和 256GB 固态硬盘。但似乎仍有足够的买家,至少对于普通用户来说,这样的配置肯定还是足够的。
价格和供应情况
目前,新款 MacBook Air 13 M3 可以在许多在线零售商处购买。例如,在亚马逊上,基本型号的售价为1,099 美元。
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
-
03/07/2024 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
此外,我们还提供了与尺寸更大的 MacBook Air 15 M3的对比照片,让您对尺寸有更直观的印象。