Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2回顾:日常使用的MacBook现在有了15英寸
Apple 笔记本电脑公司终于推出了大型MacBook Air,从而填补了其产品组合中的一个巨大空白,因为以前想要大型MacBook的人都不得不选择MacBook Pro 16。这提供了很多性能,但许多用户根本不需要它,而且最重要的是,MBP 16相对来说比较笨重和昂贵。随着新的MacBook Air 15的推出, ,现在提供了一个适合日常使用的较大的MacBook,从技术上讲,它几乎是较小的MacBook Air 13的完美复制。这基本上意味着你必须不使用新的处理器,而获得去年熟悉的M2 SoC,它又是被动冷却的。显示器当然更大,为15.3英寸,但规格保持不变,即没有HDR支持或ProMotion(120赫兹)。
Apple
起步价为1299美元,与较小的13英寸机型相比,Air 15只提供更快的M2 SoC,提供10个GPU内核。然而,其余的规格令人唏嘘,因为只有8GB的内存和256GB的小型SSD。第二个基本型号提供512GB的固态硬盘存储,但价格高出200美元,为1499.00美元。今天的测试设备配备了1TB固态硬盘和16GB内存,总价为2289欧元(约2500美元)。在接下来的几天里,我们还将仔细研究带有8GB和256GB SSD的基本型号。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
91.8 % | 06/2023 | Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 1.5 kg | 11.5 mm | 15.30" | 2880x1864 | |
84.3 % | 04/2023 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 14.7 mm | 15.00" | 2496x1664 | |
85.9 % | 12/2022 | LG Gram 15Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.1 kg | 17.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.2 % | 02/2023 | Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M | 1.9 kg | 18.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
92 % | 08/2022 | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 一个更大的MacBook Air
Apple 保持了小号的设计。MacBook Air 13在其15英寸机型上保持不变;只是占地面积稍大。然后,整体高度实际上是相同的,为11.5毫米,由于更大的外壳,新的MBA 15看起来甚至比它的小兄弟姐妹更薄。稳定性非常好,底座和显示屏盖子都不会以任何方式变形。最大打开角度和往常一样,大约是130度。
显示屏的边缘相对较窄,尽管有些Windows设备的边缘甚至更薄。当然,上部区域的网络摄像头的凹槽仍然很明显,这没有任何缺点,至少在功能上没有。然而,我们仍然认为它看起来不是特别好,但这自然是一个品味问题。底座单元的前缘相当尖锐,但由于底座本身很薄,这不会割伤手腕。
从质量上看,MacBook Air没有留下批评的余地。做工非常完美,金属外壳给人的感觉非常高端。四种可用颜色中的三种(银色、太空灰 和星光)总体上非常耐脏和耐指纹。另一方面,"午夜 "色的变体(深蓝色)在开箱后看起来不错,但之后需要不断地进行清洁。
普通的MacBook Air 13本身并不轻,而较大的Air 15的金属机身在这里也要付出代价。它的重量略高于1.5公斤,第一次握住时感觉出奇地重。这款 LG Gram 15(约1.1公斤)相比之下是一个真正的轻量级,而 表面笔记本电脑5既轻一点又厚一点。35瓦的双USB-C电源非常紧凑,重量为186克,包括MagSafe电缆。
设备 - MagSafe和USB 4.0
有两个USB-C端口(雷电3,USB4.0)以及左侧的MagSafe和一个3.5毫米插孔,端口分布与较小的型号相同。因此,Apple ,这里没有投入任何额外的工作,使机箱上的额外空间没有得到利用。右侧的另一个USB-C端口,也许还有一个SD读卡器(就像在专业机型中一样),那就更好了。此外,只有一个外部显示器可以连接到较大的MacBook Air(最大6K @60 Hz)。
沟通
Wi-Fi模块也与小型的MacBook Air M2而不是专业机型。Wi-Fi 6只支持80MHz的频率,这将传输速率限制在900Mbps左右。使用我们的华硕参考路由器,传输速率达到了预期水平,在日常使用中没有任何限制,但对于一款高端笔记本来说,它仍然不大符合要求。MacBook Air还支持蓝牙5.3。
Networking | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
LG Gram 15Z90Q | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 |
|
iperf3 receive AX12 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
网络摄像头
MacBooks上仍然没有Face ID,但1080p的网络摄像头提供了良好的质量,也适合视频通话。麦克风的情况也是如此。
维护
底部的盖子是用几颗五角螺丝固定的,但中间还有一些固定夹。在这里,你必须使用一些力量(最好是一个吸盘)来松开夹子,之后可以将盖子向前拉。内部结构(以电池为主)看起来也不错,但用户在这里无能为力。在紧急情况下,可以更换部件,如电池(用螺丝和几个拉片固定)。
输入设备 - 巨大的触控板
输入设备也被照搬过来,没有改变。黑色键盘的水平很好,普通的剪刀键也很好打,但无疑还有更好的键盘,特别是在商业领域。额外的宽度既没有用来做数字键盘,也没有用来做扬声器盖--只是增加了外壳表面。Apple 多年来一直是白色键盘照明的领导者,因为其强度是非常微调的,并根据环境光线自动调整。在一些Windows笔记本电脑中,键盘也通过传感器激活,但通常只有两个或最多三个级别的硬过渡。
大型TrackPad仍然是移动领域的标杆,与macOS的整合也很出色。由于Force Touch的存在,点击是均匀的,而且声音不大,手势的实现也很完美。像往常一样,MacBook Air不提供触摸屏。
显示屏 - 15.3英寸的液体视网膜屏
MacBook Air 15使用15.3英寸、60赫兹IPS面板。分辨率是有点歪的2880 x 1864,这是由显示器上框的摄像头缺口造成的。实际的16:10面板的分辨率为2880 x 1800,额外的64个垂直像素只是添加在上面。凹槽并没有占用16:10显示屏的任何空间。
除了更高的分辨率,与13英寸机型相比,在技术规格上没有任何变化,我们可以确认宣传的500 cd/m²的亮度(实际上平均为501 cd/m²)。93%的照度也是非常均匀的。因此,SDR亮度与MacBook Pro机型相当,但缺乏对HDR的支持意味着Air将无法显示HDR内容的所有光彩。
IPS面板的黑值偏高,为0.39cd/m²,这就是为什么对比度 "只有"~1300:1。在黑暗的背景下,底部边缘可以看到轻微的光晕,但在我们的照片中,它们看起来是增强的(由于相机的原因)。响应时间对于一个日常设备来说完全没有问题,我们也没有注意到IPS面板上有任何PWM闪烁。亮度和色温都是自动控制的,这是任何Windows笔记本电脑都无法做到的,令人满意。然而,Air不得不放弃120赫兹的ProMotion技术。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 513 cd/m²
Contrast: 1326:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
87.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB IPS, 2880x1864, 15.30 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U LQ150P1JX51, IPS, 2496x1664, 15.00 | LG Gram 15Z90Q LG LP156WFC-SPZ2 (LGD0706), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Samsung SDC4161, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry IPS, 2560x1664, 13.60 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Liquid Retina XDR, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -18% | -22% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.7 | 68.1 -31% | 63.5 -36% | 99.9 1% | 98.4 0% | 99.1 0% | 99.2 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 97.3 -3% | 95 -5% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 87.9 | 70.3 -20% | 65.1 -26% | 98.6 12% | 87.6 0% | 88 0% | |
Response Times | -67% | -36% | 93% | -23% | -217% | -31% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.8 ? | 52.4 ? -82% | 48.4 ? -68% | 0.74 97% | 32.9 ? -14% | 42.8 ? -49% | 35.2 ? -22% |
Response Time Black / White * | 18.9 ? | 28.7 ? -52% | 19.6 ? -4% | 2 ? 89% | 24.9 ? -32% | 91.6 ? -385% | 26.4 ? -40% |
PWM Frequency | 22000 ? | 59 ? | 14880 | 14880 ? | |||
Screen | 12% | -44% | -63% | -2% | 235% | 235% | |
Brightness middle | 517 | 397 -23% | 420 -19% | 378 -27% | 526 2% | 514 -1% | 500 -3% |
Brightness | 501 | 399 -20% | 399 -20% | 378 -25% | 486 -3% | 497 -1% | 489 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 85 -9% | 88 -5% | 98 5% | 87 -6% | 95 2% | 94 1% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.29 26% | 0.32 18% | 0.38 3% | 0.02 95% | 0.02 95% | |
Contrast | 1326 | 1369 3% | 1313 -1% | 1384 4% | 25700 1838% | 25000 1785% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 0.8 33% | 2.51 -109% | 2.2 -83% | 1.3 -8% | 1.4 -17% | 1.2 -0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.5 | 1.4 44% | 6.64 -166% | 4.87 -95% | 2.7 -8% | 2.8 -12% | 2.6 -4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 0.89 -11% | 2.68 -235% | 0.7 12% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.1 39% | 3.3 -83% | 1.43 21% | 2 -11% | 2.3 -28% | 1.7 6% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.18 101% | 2.052 107% | 2.47 89% | 2.25 98% | 2.27 97% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 6705 97% | 6921 94% | 6464 101% | 6858 95% | 6792 96% | 6791 96% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -24% /
-7% | -34% /
-38% | 11% /
-20% | -8% /
-4% | 6% /
111% | 68% /
165% |
* ... smaller is better
MacBook Air开箱后已经有了很好的校准。我们使用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)测量面板。与P3参考色空间相比,灰度和颜色的偏差都已经低于3,因此人眼无法分辨出与参考色的任何差异。然而,在色温有点过冷的情况下,有一个最小的偏蓝。我们能够消除这些小缺陷,并通过我们自己的校准(配置文件可在上面免费下载)在整体上改善显示器。sRGB和P3色彩空间被完全覆盖。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
18.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.5 ms rise | |
↘ 10.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.2 ms rise | |
↘ 14.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17844 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
MacBook Air的显示屏是有光泽的,但不像许多其他Windows笔记本电脑那样有光泽。当然,在户外还是会出现反光,但由于亮度好,你总能找到一个合适的位置。视角的稳定性非常好。
性能 -Apple M2,有10个GPU核心
MacBook Air 15专门配备了更快的M2芯片,它配备了10个GPU核心。该设备可以配置高达24GB的内存和2TB的PCIe固态硬盘,不过附加费用一如既往地巨大,最贵的版本要2979欧元(约3250美元)。
处理器
正如一开始提到的,在较大的MacBook Air中只使用了具有10个GPU内核的更强大的M2 SoC。该处理器提供8个内核,分为两个集群,每个集群4个内核。四个性能核心的最高频率为~3.5GHz,四个效率核心的最高频率为2.4GHz。M2在短时间内可消耗20瓦,但在持续负载下只有9瓦。
因此,该处理器已经使用了一年,这就是为什么在这里的性能方面没有惊喜。唯一的问题是被动冷却是否受益于更大的机箱,以及性能是否能更长时间地保持稳定。这里的答案是否定的,尽管目前非常炎热的温度(高达30°C/80°F)在这里可能会有一些影响。总的来说,短期基准测试和长期负载的结果都与较小的MacBook Air M2.Surface Laptop 5采用的是 酷睿i7-1255U的Surface Laptop 5在Cinebench R23等原生基准测试中仅略微快一些,但其 酷睿i5-1240P在LG的Gram 15中则要慢一些。
在电池模式下,CPU性能并没有下降。更多基准测试可在 我们的技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro -1! | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
LG Gram 15Z90Q | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Average Apple M2 | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 16201, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Average Apple M2 (8517 - 8772, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
LG Gram 15Z90Q |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 1934, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 (1580 - 1638, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
LG Gram 15Z90Q |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (810 - 6314, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
LG Gram 15Z90Q | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Average Apple M2 (2231 - 2416, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Average of class Subnotebook (216 - 738, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
LG Gram 15Z90Q | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M2 (216 - 446, n=5) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2581, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
LG Gram 15Z90Q | |
Average Apple M2 (1210 - 1243, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (149.7 - 280, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2 (222 - 229, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
LG Gram 15Z90Q |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M2 (549 - 713, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
LG Gram 15Z90Q | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Subnotebook (201 - 1600, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4274 - 12580, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Average Apple M2 (8491 - 8994, n=7) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
LG Gram 15Z90Q |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M2 (1890 - 1953, n=7) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1348 - 2350, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
LG Gram 15Z90Q | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
LG Gram 15Z90Q | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (336 - 1548, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M2 (540 - 702, n=4) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
主观的性能印象非常好,特别是在本地应用程序中。即使是像Adobe Photoshop或Premiere Pro这样的大型应用程序,对被动冷却的Air来说也没有问题。由于有Rosetta 2,Air可以模拟为x64 Macs制作的程序,这在实践中效果很好。然而,性能可能明显比本地应用程序差,特别是复杂的应用程序(如Photoshop)。
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K Metal | 12:1 8K CPU
Jetstream 2: Total Score
Speedometer 2.0: Result
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1876, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1496 - 1585, n=6) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1829, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1377 - 1441, n=6) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1777 - 1967, n=6) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1065 - 1182, n=6) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (342 - 387, n=6) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128.3 - 448, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
LG Gram 15Z90Q |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average of class Subnotebook (67.2 - 325, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (223 - 256, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
LG Gram 15Z90Q |
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (59 - 85, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (59 - 85, n=4) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB |
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Average of class Subnotebook (24 - 32, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (24 - 26, n=4) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU |
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.4 - 478, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (220 - 239, n=6) | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro |
Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (363 - 428, n=6) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (176 - 674, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro |
存储设备
这款固态硬盘是AP1024Z,我们已经从较小的型号中知道了它。它是一种PCIe 3.0固态硬盘,存储容量为1TB,其中968GB在首次启动时即可使用。传输速率达到了预期水平,即使专业型号的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘速度更快,在日常使用中也没有任何限制。更多SSD基准测试可在这里。
图形
Apple M2 SoC的图形适配器提供10个核心,工作频率最高为1.4GHz。iGPU的性能仍然非常好,远远领先于目前英特尔和AMD的iGPU。在日常生活中,iGPU可以轻松应对所有任务,包括播放高分辨率的视频。
然而,正如小型MacBook Air M2一样,性能并没有保持恒定,但在一样,性能并没有保持恒定,而是在持续负载几分钟后下降了约25%。但在电池模式下没有进一步的性能下降。更多的GPU基准测试列在 这里.
GFXBench | |
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (35.6 - 48.6, n=5) | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro | |
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (77 - 110, n=6) |
Blender - v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (205 - 237, n=2) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在上周的WWDC之后,MacBook上的游戏景观可能很快就会发生巨大的变化。除了《无人的天空》 或《死亡搁浅》等原生游戏应该在未来推出外,Apple ,提出了 "游戏移植工具包",允许开发者相对容易地将DirectX 12游戏移植到MacOS。Cyberpoint 2077等游戏的演示已经在Apple 硬件上运行得比较好。该技术是基于CrossOver的源代码,我们也用它来运行Windows游戏,如 Witcher 3在目前的MacBooks上。这里的游戏性能与小型MacBook Air M2相当。
low | med. | high | ultra | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 34 | 28 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 76 | 31 | 27 | 23 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 136 | 39 | 22 | 16 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 66.8 | 34 | 22 | 15 |
排放 - 静音操作;更好的扬声器
噪声
由于MacBook Air 15没有风扇,它在任何时候都是绝对安静的。在我们的测试设备中没有检测到任何电子噪音,如线圈啸叫。
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z | Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N | LG Gram 15Z90Q Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | |||||||
off / environment * | 23.3 | 25 | 26 | 24.7 | 23.6 | ||
Idle Minimum * | 23.3 | 26 | 26 | 24.7 | 23.6 | ||
Idle Average * | 23.3 | 27 | 26 | 24.7 | 23.6 | ||
Idle Maximum * | 23.3 | 28 | 28.1 | 24.7 | 23.6 | ||
Load Average * | 35 | 37 | 56.9 | 26.1 | 24.2 | ||
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.1 | 37 | |||||
Load Maximum * | 38.1 | 37 | 62.6 | 37.4 | 47.5 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Apple MacBook Air 15的表面温度得到了很好的控制,在日常使用或要求不高的任务中没有任何限制。热点在基本单元的中上部,即处理器所在的地方。我们在高负荷和游戏时测得的温度高达45℃,当然用手指就能感觉到,但没有问题。底部的温度保持在42℃的最高水平。Air 15可以在任何时候放在大腿上。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.5 °C / 94.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU | Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | LG Gram 15Z90Q Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | 1% | -22% | 0% | 8% | 6% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 45.1 | 44.6 1% | 46 -2% | 50.2 -11% | 44.7 1% | 41 9% | 47 -4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.5 | 47.4 -12% | 45 -6% | 50.2 -18% | 44.6 -5% | 39 8% | 42.8 -1% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.9 | 22.6 13% | 25 3% | 32.1 -24% | 25.1 3% | 24 7% | 22.3 14% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.8 | 23.3 10% | 24 7% | 34.6 -34% | 25.3 2% | 24 7% | 21.7 16% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试中,该SoC的行为再次与较小的MacBook Air相当。在运行Cinebench R23和3DMark Wildlife Extreme压力测试期间(这当然是Air的极端情况),M2芯片的消耗在短时间内稳定在8.5-9瓦特左右。更大的Air 15有轻微的优势,但在实践中你无法真正感知到这一点。
发言人
对于声音系统,Apple ,将模块的数量从4个增加到6个,这在我们的音频分析中也很明显,与较小的MacBook Air M2.更大的MacBook Pro 16的声音系统更有冲击力,但这是发散性的。总的来说,扬声器的性能非常好,很多时候你不需要外部扬声器或耳机。
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理--Air 15的电池寿命甚至更长
消耗功率
MacBook Air 15的效率很高,但消耗量受屏幕亮度的影响很大,极低亮度和最大亮度之间的差异约为7-8瓦。在我们的压力测试中,35瓦的电源限制了功耗:例如,我们在使用65瓦的电源时测得的功耗高达57瓦,之后的一段时间则为38瓦。在压力测试过程中,消费水平为26瓦。因此,35瓦的电源太弱了,但由于SoC在CPU和GPU同时受压时节流速度相当快,在日常使用中的影响相当小。
Off / Standby | 0.17 / 0.29 Watt |
Idle | 2.2 / 10 / 10.1 Watt |
Load |
33.6 / 37.2 Watt |
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.30 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N, IPS, 2496x1664, 15.00 | LG Gram 15Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.60 | Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -36% | -37% | -72% | 3% | 16% | -45% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.2 | 3.8 -73% | 4 -82% | 4.4 -100% | 1.9 14% | 1.952 ? 11% | 4.83 ? -120% |
Idle Average * | 10 | 8.2 18% | 7 30% | 5.1 49% | 9.6 4% | 8.71 ? 13% | 8.33 ? 17% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.1 | 8.4 17% | 13 -29% | 9.3 8% | 9.7 4% | 7.81 ? 23% | 10.5 ? -4% |
Load Average * | 33.6 | 50.1 -49% | 45 -34% | 67 -99% | 32.4 4% | 24.6 ? 27% | 46.3 ? -38% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 27.8 | 38.8 -40% | 35.2 -27% | 66.4 -139% | 30.8 -11% | ||
Load Maximum * | 37.2 | 69.6 -87% | 66 -77% | 93.5 -151% | 35.7 4% | 34.5 ? 7% | 66.5 ? -79% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
更大的外壳主要用于更大的电池;Air 15的电池容量为66.5Wh,而不是13英寸机型的52.6Wh。在150cd/m²亮度的视频和WLAN测试中(亮度减少了7个大级别和2个小级别),Air 15实现了极长的电池运行时间,约为16.5小时。这使它比小型的MBA 13至少领先一个小时,而且只被较大的MacBook Pro 16打败,后者配备的电池明显更大(99.6Wh)。在全亮度的WLAN测试中,我们测得的稳定运行时间刚刚超过7小时;在负载(和最大亮度)下,电池在3:15小时内就没电了。
Apple在我们审查期间,70瓦的电源没有提供给我们。当设备打开时,用附带的35瓦电源完全充电需要约2:50小时,而用普通的65瓦电源(USB-C)则减少到约2小时。
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.4 Wh | LG Gram 15Z90Q i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 80 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M, 70 Wh | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry M2 Pro 10-Core, M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, 70 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -40% | -20% | -41% | -9% | 3% | -12% | -33% | |
H.264 | 1005 | 584 -42% | 766 -24% | 946 -6% | 1048 4% | 982 -2% | 798 ? -21% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 993 | 517 -48% | 716 -28% | 692 -30% | 884 -11% | 1016 2% | 774 -22% | 630 ? -37% |
Load | 197 | 138 -30% | 173 -12% | 59 -70% | 115.1 ? -42% |
Pros
Cons
结论--MacBook Air 15是无聊的好东西
新的MacBook Air 15是一个非常好的,但也是一个无聊的设备,因为除了更大的屏幕和更高的价格之外,与较小的MacBook Air相比没有任何区别。 MacBook Air M2除了更大的屏幕和更高的价格外,与去年的小型MacBook Air M2相比没有任何区别。没有新的处理器,没有额外的端口,只有通常的基本硬件--但整体包装非常好,它只是简单地工作。最重要的是,在日常使用中,没有风扇是一个不应该被低估的方面。在我们看来,Air可以做得更好,但Apple ,在这里对自己很宽容。
15英寸机型的外壳看起来更平坦,但Air 15绝不是一个超过1.5公斤的轻型产品。显示屏非常好,质量也可与较小的Air媲美。当然,与MacBook Pro相比有一些缺点,但没有PWM,这对一些用户来说当然是一个重要因素。扬声器有两个额外的模块,总体上要好一点,但仍然没有像 MacBook Pro 16.另一方面,Apple ,与较小的兄弟姐妹相比,电池寿命也得到了改善。
Apple 为客户提供了他们想要的东西:一个更大的MacBook Air。虽然一年后,新的MacBook Air 15与它较小的兄弟姐妹的区别仅在于显示屏的大小。所有其他优点和缺点都被简单地照搬过来。这里没有创新,但这并不改变这一事实,即这也是一台总体上非常好的笔记本电脑。
我们怀疑Apple ,原本计划推出配备新M3 SoC的大型MacBook Air 15,但它根本还没有准备好。说实话,这并不是一个真正的问题,因为被动冷却的M2 SoC对大多数用户来说仍然提供足够的性能。即使是采用M1芯片的2020年老款MacBook Air仍然可以毫不犹豫地被推荐。然而,Apple ,试图实现利润最大化,特别是在内存方面,这也可以从只配备8GB内存的两个基本型号(256或512GB固态硬盘)看出。这些基本型号经常降价(甚至新的Air 15已经可以以更低的价格买到),但想要更多内存的人通常要支付高额的附加费。而230欧元(200美元)的8GB内存,说白了就是太离谱了。你还应该记住一些方面,如不存在的维护和升级选项。如果这些在购买决定中发挥了重要作用,那么大飞机15从一开始就失去了资格。
来自Windows阵营的最大竞争对手可能是微软的 Surface Laptop 5但它几乎在每个方面都落后,而且也被微软忽视了。这款 LG Gram 15要轻得多,只有1.1公斤,但在大多数其他方面的表现比Air 15差。
从性价比的角度来看,14英寸MacBook Pro是一个不错的选择。 14英寸MacBook Pro自然是更好的选择,因为现在的市场价格约为2050欧元(1999.99美元),这与配备16GB内存和512GB SSD存储的新MacBook Air 15相当。此外,Pro配备了迷你LED面板,性能明显更强。但事实是,这两款设备并不相互竞争,Apple ,Air 15针对的是不同的目标群体,他们只是想要一个更大的MacBook Air。如果考虑到macOS和大量预装软件(完整的办公套件、视频编辑等),MacBook Air M2(不管是13英寸还是15英寸)只是一个非常好的整体包装,电池寿命长。
价格和可用性
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
-
06/19/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.