Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar华硕ZenBook 14X OLED评测。游戏和强烈的3K色彩
华硕走向OLED。许多笔记本电脑系列现在都配备了OLED屏幕作为标准配置。不仅高端的Zenbook利用了更多的色彩和更大的对比度，而且Vivobooks，如Vivobook 15 M513UA--我们目前也在审查。
这一举措将OLED和3K/4K带入较低的价格区域，其他制造商可能会效仿。当与没有OLED的设备的差异只有200到300欧元时，中端客户会认真考虑购买OLED。
也就是说，中档的硬件和做工并不是华硕在Zenbook 14X上提供的东西。外壳很坚固，质量高于平均水平。输入，包括屏幕垫（ClickPad=第二显示器），都是一流的，而且性能（采用酷睿i7和Geforce MX450）几乎达到了次笔记本的顶级水平--与英特尔的其他28瓦处理器相比。
但是，竞争者从未睡过觉： 戴尔XPS 13 9310 OLED也在提供。这里唯一的区别是缺少一个DGPU吗？一个理想的比较是与 联想Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14，它也配备了OLED和一个GeForce MX450。由于没有多少OLED 14英寸的产品，我们也考虑IPS的竞争对手，只要他们至少拥有MX450或更强大的dGPU。这款 HP Envy 14-eb0010nr配有英特尔和GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q，对于游戏爱好者来说可能是最有趣的。
更多华硕Zenbook评论。
- 华硕Zenbook 14X OLED - 预览
- 华硕ZenBook 14 UX435EG(Tiger Lake, mx450, ips)
- 华硕ZenBook 13 UX325EA(Tiger Lake, Mx450, OLED)
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.7 % | 04/2022 | Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 88.3 % | 06/2021 | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 3456x2160 | |
| 86.5 % | 02/2021 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 84.8 % | 03/2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 84.1 % | 02/2021 | Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.2 % | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
外壳 - 高质量的笔记本电脑
这款机箱给我们留下了一定的印象。华硕放弃了创造最轻的机箱的目标，而是创造了一个抗扭的机箱。盖子在正常的力作用下不能被翘起!这一点极为罕见--即使在最高质量的副笔记本中也是如此。盖子的铝制背面，与显示面板一起，形成了一个似乎坚不可摧的单元。在背面施加压力或试图扭转它，都不会在屏幕上产生条纹等。
铰链的质量也很扎实：关闭的位置被磁力牢牢固定住，可以用一根手指简单地撬开。铰链在打开时保持紧密，在携带和举起时没有任何晃动或摇晃。
底座也是如此，它完全由铝制成，包括可拆卸的底板。键盘在任何时候都不会弯曲，而底座本身也是完全坚固的。
Zenbook的重量为1.44公斤，是较重的子笔记本之一，仅次于HP Envy 14-eb0010nr的1.6公斤。与较轻的14英寸和13英寸笔记本的平均重量相比，差距为100克。作为回报，你会得到一个更稳定的底座。相比之下，最薄的机型是戴尔XPS 13 9310 OLED，14.8毫米和1.2公斤。Zenbook 14X的平均厚度为17毫米，所以华硕在这里没有设定任何新标准。
硬件 - 带有Type-C-Thunderbolt的Zenbook
华硕使用两个USB-C/Thunderbolt 4端口。它们还输出图像信号（DisplayPort）并接收电源（100瓦）。相应地，可以连接三个显示器，包括HDMI。然而，在实践中，如果同时使用Type-C充电器，这将被限制为两个。不再有一个电源适配器的插座。Thunderbolt扩展坞缓解了布线的混乱，意味着PSU占用的TB4端口不再是一个问题。
SD卡阅读器
微型SD读卡器的性能，与它的同事类似，是平均的，但没有戴尔XPS那么好。我们用128GB的AV PRO V60卡进行了测试。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.9 - 193.9, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23.6 - 239, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
沟通
英特尔AX201 WiFi芯片是板载的，所以不能改变。我们的Zenbook与全新的华硕GT-AXE11000 WiFi 6路由器没有连接问题。然而，在标准化测试中，速度停留在950Mb/s，没有达到AX200、AX210和AX201在其他笔记本电脑上表现出来的速度。我们怀疑我们的路由器设置中存在节流现象。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
网络摄像头
电子快门网络摄像头产生低分辨率和相当嘈杂的图像，即使是在最好的照明条件下。电子快门意味着，当按下相应的F按钮时，相机被电动关闭。不幸的是，你不能像机械快门的红色 "帘子 "那样，在相机的眼睛上直观地看到这一点。戴尔XPS 13表明，事情可以做得更好。
辅料
配件包括一个100瓦的电源，一个USB Type-A以太网加密狗，以及一支带电池和可更换笔尖的数字笔。目前英特尔和AMD版本的Zenbook都是触摸屏，所以笔应该是每个14X的设备的一部分。
安全问题
指纹识别器不显眼地安装在电源开关上，它位于键盘的右角。Zenbook没有红外摄像头用于Windows Hello下的面部登录，甚至在其他版本中也没有。
维护
松开螺丝，用塑料铲子打开铰链之间的缝隙，就可以把底板拆下来。没有什么需要维护的：内存是板载的（没有插座），还有WiFi模块。
担保
华硕在德国给予两年的提货和退货保证。
输入设备 - 生产性布局
华硕用Screenpad补充了输入设备，它是点击板中的一个显示屏。这是一个扩展的桌面，可以将任何窗口拖到上面--比如音频播放器或Photoshop中的调色板。这是否会产生有用的应用，取决于所使用的工具，当然也取决于人们是否可以间歇性地不使用ClickPad。
键盘
哑光的防滑键有一个独特的压力点，落差适中，笔触有力。打字时几乎无声无息。由于有三层白色背光，你可以在黑暗的环境中工作而没有问题。
总的来说，大的Shift、Ctrl和方向键的广泛布局使人能够快速工作，甚至是盲目工作。按笔记本电脑的标准，按键间距相当大（2.5毫米），因为这里使用了底座的整个宽度。在右边，甚至有足够的空间用于上/下页和原点/终点--这是一个成功的实际使用的布局。另一个非常积极的方面是键盘的牢固底座；在任何时候都不会出现问题。
总而言之，结果是一个宽敞的键盘，只是在压力点方面稍稍落后于戴尔Latitude 7420这样的商业专业人士。Zenbook的打字速度当然很快。这篇评论是在Zenbook的键盘上写的。
触摸板
点击板的敏感度一直到边缘，并且有一个短的落差。它工作时发出沉闷、安静的噪音。哑光的表面很光滑，接近于滑溜溜的，可以舒适地引导手指。我们发现短的落点行程不能令人满意。
如果需要的话，这个垫子可以成为一个屏幕。垫子的功能可以通过交叉渐变快速使用，也可以通过关闭显示功能（Fn+F6）长时间使用。ScreenPad 2.0的分辨率为FHD+（2160x1080）；它是一个IPS面板。在Windows中，副显示屏作为一个扩展桌面运行。华硕为ScreenPad准备了分组。每个组都可以填充在小显示屏上看起来很有用的应用程序：手写、数字键盘、应用商店、计算器或Spotify。
显示 - 大量的色彩空间和对比度
购买Zenbook 14X的主要理由是其14英寸OLED面板。三星提供了一个WQXGA+面板，像素为2,880x1,800（16：10）。刷新率为90赫兹，响应时间为0.2毫秒，显示效果优于其他各种IPS面板。
它还承诺100%的DCI-P3色域，这在我们的测量中得到了证实。华硕谈到了400尼特的亮度；我们测量的平均亮度为347cd/m²，最大亮度为351。尼特和cd/m²是1:1转换的，所以我们无法测量制造商所宣传的亮度。亮度分布均匀，这是OLED的典型特征。
无论如何，高亮度对OLED显示器是有害的，所以这不应该连续运行。 华硕用一个不能关闭的OLED屏保来应对 "烧毁 "问题。这在15分钟后自动激活。用户可以在权衡风险后停用屏保（显示相应的警告），这只能通过个人的MyAsus设置完成。这迫使用户创建一个账户。
屏占比为92％，这是在大量显示屏周围的非常小的框架。三星面板使用直流调光来降低亮度，这也可以在MyAsus中调整。
华硕为Zenbook 14X提供了三种面板选择：WQXGA+（2,880x1,800）作为触摸（如测试设备），QHD+（2,560x1,600）作为非触摸，以及4K触摸（3,840x2,400）。诸如HDR真黑600、100% DCI-P3和92%的屏占比等标准对所有变体都是相同的。据说最亮的面板是4K触摸版本（550而不是400尼特）。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 345 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 0.85 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W Samsung SDC415B ATNA40YN04-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Samsung 134XK01, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr AU Optronics AUOF392, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG Au Optronics B140HAN03.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 BOE CQ NV140FHM-N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -15% | 0% | -28% | -53% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 100 | 99.7 0% | 77.1 -23% | 99.9 0% | 60.9 -39% | 39.9 -60% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | 90.4 -10% | 58.8 -41% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98 | 97.7 0% | 76.7 -22% | 97.6 0% | 62.3 -36% | 41.2 -58% |
| Response Times | -7% | -2580% | 4% | -1575% | -637% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 2.2 ? -10% | 61.2 ? -2960% | 2.4 ? -20% | 39 ? -1850% | 25 ? -1150% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 2 ? | 2.2 ? -10% | 46 ? -2200% | 2.4 -20% | 28 ? -1300% | 16 ? -700% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 240.4 ? 0% | 362.3 ? 51% | 92 ? -62% | ||
| Screen | -41% | -18% | -18% | -119% | -90% | |
| Brightness middle | 345 | 384 11% | 412 19% | 399 16% | 323 -6% | 347 1% |
| Brightness | 348 | 387 11% | 392 13% | 401 15% | 313 -10% | 311 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 97 -1% | 81 -17% | 98 0% | 80 -18% | 81 -17% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.001 | 0.36 | 0.12 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.92 | 4.56 -138% | 1.88 2% | 2.5 -30% | 4.86 -153% | 5.05 -163% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.72 | 7.27 -54% | 3.06 35% | 4.6 3% | 7.52 -59% | 16.98 -260% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.85 | 1.5 -76% | 2.2 -159% | 1.8 -112% | 4.83 -468% | 1.63 -92% |
| Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.26 97% | 2.1 105% | 2.17 101% | 2.64 83% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6475 100% | 6219 105% | 6650 98% | 6368 102% | 7405 88% | 6666 98% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.52 | 1.96 | 2.2 | 3.64 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 87.1 | 68.7 | 57.5 | 38 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99.8 | 90.3 | 58 | ||
| Contrast | 1288 | 399000 | 897 | 2892 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-22% | -871% /
-483% | -5% /
-8% | -574% /
-359% | -260% /
-218% |
* ... smaller is better
正如预期的那样，OLED显示屏具有极好的对比度（∞：1），黑色是深黑色，颜色是鲜艳的。响应时间也很好，这也是OLED的典型特征。颜色和OLED主题是在MyAsus中管理的。
在校准之前，我们确定灰度和颜色的DeltaE分别为0.8和2.8--非常好的数值，因为它们低于3.0。然而，校准使灰度变得更差，色彩变得更好。简而言之：校准是不必要的，因为工厂校准的面板似乎是最佳设置。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ≤ 40 % brightness setting |   |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
亮度降低的PWM，频率为240赫兹（上图，波形），可用于0至5（满分10分）的亮度等级，高于此等级则使用直流调光（下图，线）。这种技术是PWM的一种替代方法，在PWM中，像素被短暂关闭。直流调光降低了电压，这就是为什么像素的亮度降低。低于60%的亮度，直流调光会导致颜色表现明显恶化，这就是为什么OLED在这里切换到PWM（240Hz）。敏感的人可能会受此影响，尽管我们在实时使用中很少低于60%。对于在日光下的正常办公室使用，我们在70-80%的水平上操作。用户可以通过 "无闪烁OLED调光 "选项来调整屏幕的调光水平。
眩光型表面（非触摸）在户外受到反射的影响，而强大的亮度在这里几乎没有帮助。该屏幕在阴凉处也能很好地使用，这也是因为在电池模式下亮度没有节流（图像中心为345cd/m²）。
毫无疑问，OLED面板的可视角度是目前最好的。即使从平坦的角度看，颜色仍然稳定，亮度也不会出现任何减弱。
性能--带有更快的MX450变体的Zenbook
华硕使用28瓦的Tiger Lake ，并使用英特尔酷睿i7-1165G7（2.8GHz），集成英特尔Iris Xe G7 GPU（12代）。后者由一个可以关闭的NvidiaGeForce MX450（Optimus）补充。对于价格敏感的买家来说，还有一个配备i5-1135G7（2.4 GHz）的变体，也与MX450相结合。目标群体是专业用户，他们正在寻找一个漂亮、方便的笔记本，配备高端显示器和全面的性能，用于工作和娱乐。
测试条件
MyAsus允许你选择一个独立于Windows电源设置的性能模式。在进行基准测试和负载测量时，我们选择了 "性能模式 "和Windows设置的 "最佳性能 "相结合。Windows的省电模式被完全停用。对于WiFi运行时间测试，我们激活了华硕 "静音模式 "和Windows "最佳节能"。我们没有改变BIOS中任何与性能有关的设置。用户只有通过创建MyAsus账户才能访问华硕的性能模式。这一强制措施--因为它对所有OLED设置也是必要的--是一个值得批评的地方。
处理器
Core i7-1165G7（2.8 GHz）的PL1为50瓦，PL2（短热）为61瓦。然而，在实践中，该处理器并没有在这个范围内运行，正如下面显示的CPU总功耗。50瓦的水平没有达到；20秒后该值稳定在40瓦。负载开始时的功率峰值很低，其中4GHz在多核中只维持了几秒钟。见Logviewer Prime95。
正如Cinebench R15循环演示的那样，至少在永久负载下，可访问的可用功率保持不变。这表明酷睿i7并不比名义上较弱的酷睿i5快，比如安装在惠普Envy 14中的那台。正如经常显示的那样，Ryzen 9 5900HS在这方面处于一个完全不同的联盟。
在所有Cinebench测试中，i7-1165G7在多核方面以明显的优势（-50%）跟随Ryzen 9。在单核方面，我们的Core i7只有-9%的差距。底线是，与具有相同芯片组的其他型号相比，该SoC略高于平均水平，如Zenbook 14 UX435和MSI Modern 14。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG -1! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2525 - 6862, n=64) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1110 - 1539, n=59) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=81) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=81) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=86) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=78) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=80) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16223 - 67444, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=80) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2197 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=80) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=77) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=77) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1.5 - 19.4, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (40.1 - 120.5, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.4397 - 1.236, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 25961, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3933 - 8184, n=58) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11867 - 111109, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (17720 - 34369, n=58) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (453 - 4646, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (958 - 2338, n=58) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15447 - 115300, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (44161 - 50624, n=58) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1223 - 14944, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3183 - 4796, n=58) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6379 - 59053, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (11876 - 20468, n=58) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (29506 - 73387, n=58) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (270 - 1123, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (169 - 402, n=65) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (204 - 14018, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2033 - 4461, n=58) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7622 - 53954, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (12392 - 45694, n=58) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
系统性能
根据PCMark 10，Zenbook 14X在应用性能方面处于领先地位，甚至可以在生产力方面领先于AMD的Ryzen 9。这不一定是英特尔Optane H10的功劳，下面关于固态硬盘的章节将说明这一点。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (4823 - 5814, n=9) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (8088 - 9955, n=9) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (7826 - 9292, n=9) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (4812 - 5878, n=9) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 () | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 () | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 () | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 () | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5554 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 95353, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (20032 - 65446, n=58) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 86433, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (23033 - 64524, n=58) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 93382, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21736 - 66791, n=58) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.8 - 172, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (71.4 - 110, n=65) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试中（网络冲浪、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载），Zenbook显示出延迟增加的问题。这是由于内核模式和ACPI驱动程序造成的。目前的驱动程序配置不适合实时音频应用。在视频播放过程中，有132个跳帧。但这反映了目前的配置；如果改变驱动设置，情况可能会有所不同。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
来自英特尔的固态硬盘是Optane Memory H10，具有32GB缓存和1TB总存储空间。交货时大约有870GB。在AS固态硬盘的基准比较图中，英特尔的Optane在所有学科中都明显超过了SK Hynix和三星PM981。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU
MX450（图灵TU117M）是第二个最强的N18S-G5变体，具有64位连接和1,395至1,575 MHz连同GDDR6。尽管有dGPU，华硕并没有使用第二个风扇。
N18S-G5-B: GBD-128封装, 1,395-1,575 MHz, GDDR6 5001 MHz, 28.5 W
N18S-G5：GB2E-64封装，1,395-1,575 MHz，GDDR6 5001 MHz，25 W
N18S-G5。GB2E-64封装，1,395-1,575 MHz，GDDR5 3501 MHz，25 W
N18S-LP：GB2E-64封装，720-930 MHz，GDDR6 5001 MHz，12 W
除了GeForce MX450 GPU之外，还有集成的英特尔Iris Xe 96EUs。在合成基准测试中，MX450名列前茅，只有惠普Envy 14中明显更强的GTX 1650 Ti超过了它。集成的英特尔Iris Xe 96EUs大约慢了30%，这取决于基准测试。
但我们也从图表中看到，MX450并不总是同样快。Zenbook 14 UX435和微星Modern 14在所有3DMark基准测试中的得分要低20-30%。究其原因。微星选择了GDDR5版本，而UX435则是低功耗的12瓦版本。如果你正在寻找一个快速的MX450，Zenbook 14X是一个不错的选择。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2979 - 16904, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (6341 - 9580, n=16) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13768 - 65911, n=39, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (25467 - 33806, n=13) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2837 - 12349, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (4336 - 5753, n=17) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (811 - 4773, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1086 - 2300, n=16) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6890 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21278 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5313 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2487 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
3DMark的规格在真正的游戏基准测试中得到了证实；Zenbook 14X中的MX450比MSI Modern 14或Zenbook 14 UX435获得了更多的帧数。尽管联想Yoga Slim 7 Pro的CPU更强（25瓦，2GB GDDR6），但在游戏中也不相上下。但我们的Zenbook无法赶上GTX 1650；惠普Envy 14要快20-100%，这取决于游戏。我们的测试设备不适合3K；Zenbook在FHD中达到了30-45帧的可玩性极限。重要的是。对于游戏，必须激活MyAsus中的性能模式；静音和平衡模式实现的帧数较少。
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.2 - 92, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (21 - 46, n=16) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (17.2 - 24.8, n=16) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8 - 44.2, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| GTA V | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (30.6 - 68.3, n=11) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10 - 121, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (22.3 - 30.5, n=9) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5.01 - 67.5, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (34.9 - 104.6, n=20) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (29.4 - 109.1, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (25 - 34.5, n=13) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10.8 - 71, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (27.6 - 72.2, n=16) | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.9 - 130.6, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (35.4 - 71.4, n=20) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (21.2 - 97.1, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 86, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (18.9 - 36.6, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
| MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
| God of War - 1920x1080 Original Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (18.4 - 26.1, n=2) | |
我们在Ultra（FHD）设置下观看了Witcher 3 ，角色没有被移动（性能模式）。帧率在典型的波动范围内保持不变。不受影响，时钟在50秒后从1575MHz降至1450MHz左右（Logviewer）。
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagramm
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
| GTA V (2015) | 50 | 23 | ||||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 43.5 | 23.8 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 135.6 | 122.6 | 115 | 104.6 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 69.5 | 33.4 | ||||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 94.9 | 81.6 | 67.4 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 137.7 | 53.1 | 46.6 | 36.6 | ||
| Riders Republic (2021) | 39 | 29 | 23 | 8 | ||
| Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 40 | 28 | 12 | |||
| Battlefield 2042 (2021) | 4.5 | 17.8 | 4.4 | |||
| Farming Simulator 22 (2021) | 79 | 55 | 24.2 | 19.2 | ||
| Halo Infinite (2021) | 0 game wont start | |||||
| God of War (2022) | 32.1 | 26.1 | 6.5 | |||
| Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) | 94 | 39 | 40 | 18 | ||
| Dying Light 2 (2022) | 25.7 | 20 | 16.8 | 9.4 | ||
| GRID Legends (2022) | 88.06 | 62.01 | 53.159 | 33.39 | 23.8 | 12.8 |
| Elden Ring (2022) | 32 | 31.5 | 30.5 | 26.8 | 13.5 | |
| Elex 2 (2022) | 6.7 | |||||
| Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 32.7 | 32.2 | 31.5 | 26 | 11.6 | |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 38.64 | 27.66 | 15.84 | 13.4 |
排放 - 安静的华硕Zenbook
噪声
风扇的声音相当响亮。我们在空转时没有记录到任何东西，尽管风扇是部分活动的，你只能用耳朵靠近来听。在负载情况下，我们测得40 dB(A)。负载是指Witcher 3 ，在FHD的Ultra设置下。风扇在高负荷下持续工作，不管是GPU还是CPU。在Prime95和Furmark压力测试中，也达到了40 dB(A)。风扇的动态变化不值得担心：它的转速难以察觉，然后又缓缓下降。配备更强大的显卡的惠普Envy 14在平均负荷下更安静，但在最大负荷下更响亮（48 dB(A)）。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 26.6 / 26.6 / 27.2 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40.1 / 40.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26.6 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H) | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 GeForce MX450, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 13% | 1% | 2% | 1% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 26.6 | 24.8 7% | 25.9 3% | 24.7 7% | 25.6 4% | 26 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 26.6 | 25 6% | 26 2% | 24.7 7% | 25.6 4% | 26 2% |
| Idle Average * | 26.6 | 25 6% | 26 2% | 24.7 7% | 25.6 4% | 26 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.2 | 25 8% | 26 4% | 27.3 -0% | 26.3 3% | 26 4% |
| Load Average * | 40.1 | 25.3 37% | 34.9 13% | 41 -2% | 41.6 -4% | 46.3 -15% |
| Load Maximum * | 40.4 | 35.8 11% | 48.7 -21% | 43.5 -8% | 41.6 -3% | 52.9 -31% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.8 | 34.5 | 43.5 | 41.6 | 46.3 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在办公室的情况下，我们的测试设备在桌子上一直是手热的，即在热点处有35到40度。出风口在左侧，进风口在关节之间。箱子上的废热在负载下明显增加，顶部和底部高达50度。掌托不超过37度，但在键盘上可以轻易达到49度。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.1 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.4 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.5 °C / 97.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-8.2 °C / -14.8 F).
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 12% | 5% | 2% | 20% | -5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 49.1 | 46.6 5% | 41.2 16% | 44.5 9% | 39.1 20% | 55.6 -13% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 50.4 | 46 9% | 45.6 10% | 56.4 -12% | 36.6 27% | 67.8 -35% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 33.6 | 26.6 21% | 31.8 5% | 29.1 13% | 28.4 15% | 28.3 16% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33.6 | 29.2 13% | 37.8 -13% | 34 -1% | 27.5 18% | 28.9 14% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
我们用Prime95和Furmark进行的压力测试考察了系统在一段时间内如何处理最大负荷。我们先看了华硕的 "性能模式"，然后是 "平衡模式"。与Prime95 Solo一样，核心时钟非常短暂地跳到4.1GHz，但随后在20秒内下降到3.4GHz并保持在那里。同时，温度在90度左右徘徊。
在 "平衡 "状态下，情况有些不同：开始时是3.0GHz，然后在20秒后下降到2.2GHz，并有下降趋势。同时，PL1的功率限制从25瓦下降到18瓦，数值不断下降。而不是40瓦，处理器只能以18瓦对待自己。简而言之：如果你需要计算能力，不要忘记 "性能模式"。
发言人
Zenbook提供了音量，一定量的低频和低音，并以一种平衡的方式再现了高音。小扬声器位于掌托下的左右两边，利用底座作为反射器。在这方面，在坚硬的桌面上的声音比在柔软的地毯上要好。双阵列麦克风可以无噪音地记录声音，是视频通话和会议的理想选择。
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
空闲时的最大功耗为11瓦，比其他OLED设备要低。除其他外，可实现的最大亮度在这里起了作用，在我们的系统中低于Yoga Slim或戴尔XPS 13。对二氧化碳足迹不利：OLED屏保的功耗不必要地高，空转时为6-8瓦。
在超级设置下运行Witcher 3 ，即MX450的最大游戏负荷，需要68瓦。这是平均值；由于GPU时钟节流，功耗在57至72瓦之间波动。
在压力测试中，100瓦的电源适配器必须在最大负荷下真正推动自己：它必须在开始时提供104瓦的功率。正如压力测试所显示的，在这种情况下，节流大大降低了功耗，即一分钟后达到80瓦。
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 1.6 Watt |
| Idle | 8.1 / 10 / 11 Watt |
| Load |
67.8 / 104 Watt |
   
| |
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H), OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 31% | -25% | -22% | 25% | 18% | 19% | 26% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 8.1 | 5.7 30% | 4.2 48% | 9.5 -17% | 3.4 58% | 3 63% | 4.91 ? 39% | 4.9 ? 40% |
| Idle Average * | 10 | 6 40% | 18.3 -83% | 14.1 -41% | 7.6 24% | 6.3 37% | 8.36 ? 16% | 8.36 ? 16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11 | 12.3 -12% | 19.2 -75% | 14.9 -35% | 14.2 -29% | 10.3 6% | 11.1 ? -1% | 10.4 ? 5% |
| Load Average * | 67.8 | 44.4 35% | 72.9 -8% | 79.5 -17% | 56 17% | 66 3% | 58.4 ? 14% | 45.9 ? 32% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 57 | 36.5 36% | 61.5 -8% | 73.5 -29% | 41 28% | 66.6 -17% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 104 | 47.8 54% | 127.8 -23% | 98.5 5% | 50.4 52% | 90.6 13% | 76.2 ? 27% | 66 ? 37% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
Zenbook 14X的电池寿命并不长：尽管我们禁用了OLED屏幕保护程序，但WiFi测试只运行了5:34小时。如果浏览器测试以最大亮度运行，则运行时间明显降低，为3:16小时。Zenbook不得不使用63瓦特，但这是通常的配置，对许多竞争对手来说也是如此。只要看一眼图表就够了。其他OLED机型也没有达到任何运行时间的高度。尽管屏幕很漂亮，但IPS笔记本电脑的运行时间更长。
| Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 63 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 63.3 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450, 61 Wh | Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 63 Wh | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 52.4 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 17% | 80% | -2% | 33% | 57% | 68% | |
| Reader / Idle | 675 | 1661 146% | 1109 64% | 1252 ? 85% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 334 | 391 17% | 649 94% | 327 -2% | 507 52% | 523 57% | 629 ? 88% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 98 | ||||||
| Load | 89 | 90 1% | 73 -18% | 115.4 ? 30% | |||
| H.264 | 605 | 794 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 色彩强烈，电池寿命短
通过Zenbook 14X，华硕在其范围内有了一个14英寸的产品，主要是--使用起来很愉快。首先，有一个丰富多彩的OLED面板，具有3K分辨率，显示sRGB和DCI-P3色彩空间。
Zenbook在做工、输入设备和连接方面也处于领先地位，有2个Thunderbolt 4端口和一个慷慨的键盘布局。使用起来很愉快，Zenbook 14X是一个坚实的、非常好的副笔记本，可以很好地放在桌子上。
然而，5小时的运行时间对于现在的高端次笔记本来说低于平均水平。OLED屏保在空闲模式下会导致耗电量增加。另一个批评点是MyAsus的强制性账户：没有注册的人将无法访问基本的性能、电池和OLED设置。只有在那里才能激活 "性能模式"，也只有在那里我们才能关闭偶尔恼人的OLED屏保。
虽然大多数领域都值得称赞，但电池寿命、功耗和硬件管理是值得批评的地方。
单个风扇必须同时冷却MX450和英特尔i7，这在确保两个组件的充分性能方面效果很好。但是，充足并不意味着高于平均水平，特别是由于酷睿i7在开始加载时的性能峰值是缺乏的。另一方面，MX450有一个快速版本，可以确保游戏中的帧率高于平均水平。
关于Screenpad 2.0，用户将自己发现第二个显示屏是否是一个有用的功能，或者它是否会被闲置遗忘。在生产性使用方面，我们喜欢键盘、连接性和带有手写笔的高分辨率触摸面板。
那些选择Zenbook 14X的人将得到大量的显示效果，以及适度的游戏能力和高质量、稳定的结构。
竞争者并不轻松，因为戴尔的OLED的 XPS 13和联想的 瑜伽瘦身7 Pro 也因缩短电池寿命而受到批评。瑜伽的游戏性能相当，但处理器更强大。整体而言，Yoga Slim 7 Pro绝对是顶级竞争者之一。屏幕略微更亮，但键盘达不到Zenbook 14X的级别，而且--也许是另一个决定性的点--Yoga Slim 7没有Thunderbolt。
如果OLED不发挥主要作用，那么应该考虑像华硕Zenbook 14 UX435EG（MX450）或惠普Envy 14-eb0010nr（GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q）这样强大的14英寸产品，其中Envy 14拥有更好的IPS屏幕和对比领域中最好的GPU。然后是华硕ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA，我们还没有评测。从技术上讲，它有望成为一个非常有趣和相对便宜的入门级OLED设备，配备Ryzen 5000和FHD OLED（大约1100欧元）。
价格和可获得性
华硕Zenbook 14X UX5400E目前在美国亚马逊https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09SVS1JR3?tag=lowpi-20&linkCode=osi&th=1售价1.399,99美元。
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W
-
08/30/2022 v7
Sebastian Jentsch
Pricecompare
