华硕ZenBook 14X OLED评测。游戏和强烈的3K色彩

华硕走向OLED。许多笔记本电脑系列现在都配备了OLED屏幕作为标准配置。不仅高端的Zenbook利用了更多的色彩和更大的对比度,而且Vivobooks,如Vivobook 15 M513UA--我们目前也在审查。
这一举措将OLED和3K/4K带入较低的价格区域,其他制造商可能会效仿。当与没有OLED的设备的差异只有200到300欧元时,中端客户会认真考虑购买OLED。
也就是说,中档的硬件和做工并不是华硕在Zenbook 14X上提供的东西。外壳很坚固,质量高于平均水平。输入,包括屏幕垫(ClickPad=第二显示器),都是一流的,而且性能(采用酷睿i7和Geforce MX450)几乎达到了次笔记本的顶级水平--与英特尔的其他28瓦处理器相比。
但是,竞争者从未睡过觉: 戴尔XPS 13 9310 OLED也在提供。这里唯一的区别是缺少一个DGPU吗?一个理想的比较是与 联想Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14,它也配备了OLED和一个GeForce MX450。由于没有多少OLED 14英寸的产品,我们也考虑IPS的竞争对手,只要他们至少拥有MX450或更强大的dGPU。这款 HP Envy 14-eb0010nr配有英特尔和GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q,对于游戏爱好者来说可能是最有趣的。
更多华硕Zenbook评论。
- 华硕Zenbook 14X OLED - 预览
- 华硕ZenBook 14 UX435EG(Tiger Lake, mx450, ips)
- 华硕ZenBook 13 UX325EA(Tiger Lake, Mx450, OLED)
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87 % | 04/2022 | Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88 % | 06/2021 | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 3456x2160 | |
86.5 % | 02/2021 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
84.8 % | 03/2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
84.1 % | 02/2021 | Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
82.2 % | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
外壳 - 高质量的笔记本电脑
这款机箱给我们留下了一定的印象。华硕放弃了创造最轻的机箱的目标,而是创造了一个抗扭的机箱。盖子在正常的力作用下不能被翘起!这一点极为罕见--即使在最高质量的副笔记本中也是如此。盖子的铝制背面,与显示面板一起,形成了一个似乎坚不可摧的单元。在背面施加压力或试图扭转它,都不会在屏幕上产生条纹等。
铰链的质量也很扎实:关闭的位置被磁力牢牢固定住,可以用一根手指简单地撬开。铰链在打开时保持紧密,在携带和举起时没有任何晃动或摇晃。
底座也是如此,它完全由铝制成,包括可拆卸的底板。键盘在任何时候都不会弯曲,而底座本身也是完全坚固的。
Zenbook的重量为1.44公斤,是较重的子笔记本之一,仅次于HP Envy 14-eb0010nr的1.6公斤。与较轻的14英寸和13英寸笔记本的平均重量相比,差距为100克。作为回报,你会得到一个更稳定的底座。相比之下,最薄的机型是戴尔XPS 13 9310 OLED,14.8毫米和1.2公斤。Zenbook 14X的平均厚度为17毫米,所以华硕在这里没有设定任何新标准。
硬件 - 带有Type-C-Thunderbolt的Zenbook
华硕使用两个USB-C/Thunderbolt 4端口。它们还输出图像信号(DisplayPort)并接收电源(100瓦)。相应地,可以连接三个显示器,包括HDMI。然而,在实践中,如果同时使用Type-C充电器,这将被限制为两个。不再有一个电源适配器的插座。Thunderbolt扩展坞缓解了布线的混乱,意味着PSU占用的TB4端口不再是一个问题。
SD卡阅读器
微型SD读卡器的性能,与它的同事类似,是平均的,但没有戴尔XPS那么好。我们用128GB的AV PRO V60卡进行了测试。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14.9 - 194.7, n=48, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16.3 - 206, n=47, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
沟通
英特尔AX201 WiFi芯片是板载的,所以不能改变。我们的Zenbook与全新的华硕GT-AXE11000 WiFi 6路由器没有连接问题。然而,在标准化测试中,速度停留在950Mb/s,没有达到AX200、AX210和AX201在其他笔记本电脑上表现出来的速度。我们怀疑我们的路由器设置中存在节流现象。
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=322) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (180 - 1614, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=322) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (182 - 1690, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 |
网络摄像头

辅料
担保
华硕在德国给予两年的提货和退货保证。
输入设备 - 生产性布局
键盘
哑光的防滑键有一个独特的压力点,落差适中,笔触有力。打字时几乎无声无息。由于有三层白色背光,你可以在黑暗的环境中工作而没有问题。
总的来说,大的Shift、Ctrl和方向键的广泛布局使人能够快速工作,甚至是盲目工作。按笔记本电脑的标准,按键间距相当大(2.5毫米),因为这里使用了底座的整个宽度。在右边,甚至有足够的空间用于上/下页和原点/终点--这是一个成功的实际使用的布局。另一个非常积极的方面是键盘的牢固底座;在任何时候都不会出现问题。
总而言之,结果是一个宽敞的键盘,只是在压力点方面稍稍落后于戴尔Latitude 7420这样的商业专业人士。Zenbook的打字速度当然很快。这篇评论是在Zenbook的键盘上写的。
触摸板
点击板的敏感度一直到边缘,并且有一个短的落差。它工作时发出沉闷、安静的噪音。哑光的表面很光滑,接近于滑溜溜的,可以舒适地引导手指。我们发现短的落点行程不能令人满意。
如果需要的话,这个垫子可以成为一个屏幕。垫子的功能可以通过交叉渐变快速使用,也可以通过关闭显示功能(Fn+F6)长时间使用。ScreenPad 2.0的分辨率为FHD+(2160x1080);它是一个IPS面板。在Windows中,副显示屏作为一个扩展桌面运行。华硕为ScreenPad准备了分组。每个组都可以填充在小显示屏上看起来很有用的应用程序:手写、数字键盘、应用商店、计算器或Spotify。
显示 - 大量的色彩空间和对比度
购买Zenbook 14X的主要理由是其14英寸OLED面板。三星提供了一个WQXGA+面板,像素为2,880x1,800(16:10)。刷新率为90赫兹,响应时间为0.2毫秒,显示效果优于其他各种IPS面板。
它还承诺100%的DCI-P3色域,这在我们的测量中得到了证实。华硕谈到了400尼特的亮度;我们测量的平均亮度为347cd/m²,最大亮度为351。尼特和cd/m²是1:1转换的,所以我们无法测量制造商所宣传的亮度。亮度分布均匀,这是OLED的典型特征。
无论如何,高亮度对OLED显示器是有害的,所以这不应该连续运行。 华硕用一个不能关闭的OLED屏保来应对 "烧毁 "问题。这在15分钟后自动激活。用户可以在权衡风险后停用屏保(显示相应的警告),这只能通过个人的MyAsus设置完成。这迫使用户创建一个账户。
屏占比为92%,这是在大量显示屏周围的非常小的框架。三星面板使用直流调光来降低亮度,这也可以在MyAsus中调整。
华硕为Zenbook 14X提供了三种面板选择:WQXGA+(2,880x1,800)作为触摸(如测试设备),QHD+(2,560x1,600)作为非触摸,以及4K触摸(3,840x2,400)。诸如HDR真黑600、100% DCI-P3和92%的屏占比等标准对所有变体都是相同的。据说最亮的面板是4K触摸版本(550而不是400尼特)。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 345 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.92 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 0.85 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W Samsung SDC415B ATNA40YN04-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Samsung 134XK01, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr AU Optronics AUOF392, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG Au Optronics B140HAN03.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 BOE CQ NV140FHM-N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -15% | 0% | -28% | -53% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 100 | 99.7 0% | 77.1 -23% | 99.9 0% | 60.9 -39% | 39.9 -60% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | 90.4 -10% | 58.8 -41% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98 | 97.7 0% | 76.7 -22% | 97.6 0% | 62.3 -36% | 41.2 -58% |
Response Times | -7% | -2580% | 4% | -1575% | -637% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 2.2 ? -10% | 61.2 ? -2960% | 2.4 ? -20% | 39 ? -1850% | 25 ? -1150% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2 ? | 2.2 ? -10% | 46 ? -2200% | 2.4 -20% | 28 ? -1300% | 16 ? -700% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 240.4 ? 0% | 362.3 ? 51% | 92 ? -62% | ||
Screen | -41% | -18% | -18% | -119% | -90% | |
Brightness middle | 345 | 384 11% | 412 19% | 399 16% | 323 -6% | 347 1% |
Brightness | 348 | 387 11% | 392 13% | 401 15% | 313 -10% | 311 -11% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 97 -1% | 81 -17% | 98 0% | 80 -18% | 81 -17% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.001 | 0.36 | 0.12 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.92 | 4.56 -138% | 1.88 2% | 2.5 -30% | 4.86 -153% | 5.05 -163% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.72 | 7.27 -54% | 3.06 35% | 4.6 3% | 7.52 -59% | 16.98 -260% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.85 | 1.5 -76% | 2.2 -159% | 1.8 -112% | 4.83 -468% | 1.63 -92% |
Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.26 97% | 2.1 105% | 2.17 101% | 2.64 83% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6475 100% | 6219 105% | 6650 98% | 6368 102% | 7405 88% | 6666 98% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.52 | 1.96 | 2.2 | 3.64 | ||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 87.1 | 68.7 | 57.5 | 38 | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99.8 | 90.3 | 58 | ||
Contrast | 1288 | 399000 | 897 | 2892 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-22% | -871% /
-483% | -5% /
-8% | -574% /
-359% | -260% /
-218% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ≤ 40 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能--带有更快的MX450变体的Zenbook
测试条件
处理器
Core i7-1165G7(2.8 GHz)的PL1为50瓦,PL2(短热)为61瓦。然而,在实践中,该处理器并没有在这个范围内运行,正如下面显示的CPU总功耗。50瓦的水平没有达到;20秒后该值稳定在40瓦。负载开始时的功率峰值很低,其中4GHz在多核中只维持了几秒钟。见Logviewer Prime95。
正如Cinebench R15循环演示的那样,至少在永久负载下,可访问的可用功率保持不变。这表明酷睿i7并不比名义上较弱的酷睿i5快,比如安装在惠普Envy 14中的那台。正如经常显示的那样,Ryzen 9 5900HS在这方面处于一个完全不同的联盟。
在所有Cinebench测试中,i7-1165G7在多核方面以明显的优势(-50%)跟随Ryzen 9。在单核方面,我们的Core i7只有-9%的差距。底线是,与具有相同芯片组的其他型号相比,该SoC略高于平均水平,如Zenbook 14 UX435和MSI Modern 14。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG -1! | |
Average of class Subnotebook |
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (965 - 12181, n=72, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2525 - 6862, n=62) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG |
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1110 - 1539, n=57) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Average of class Subnotebook (409 - 1624, n=70, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (376 - 4704, n=108, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=79) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=79) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Average of class Subnotebook (157 - 620, n=109, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (162 - 2041, n=114, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=84) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=76) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Average of class Subnotebook (70.1 - 239, n=106, last 2 years) |
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (253 - 2650, n=106, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=78) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4937 - 54374, n=107, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=78) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=78) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2145 - 5800, n=107, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=75) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1024 - 7867, n=105, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=75) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Average of class Subnotebook (293 - 1740, n=105, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1.02 - 14.8, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=78) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (12.9 - 157, n=107, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=76) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.501 - 1.728, n=106, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=78) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (900 - 14130, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3933 - 8184, n=56) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5075 - 89691, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (17720 - 34369, n=56) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (958 - 2338, n=56) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (334 - 3077, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15300 - 101910, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (44161 - 50624, n=56) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1078 - 13703, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3183 - 4796, n=56) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2623 - 49277, n=85, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (11876 - 20468, n=56) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (29506 - 73387, n=56) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4999 - 121917, n=85, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average of class Subnotebook (117 - 797, n=88, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (169 - 402, n=63) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (494 - 7412, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2033 - 4461, n=56) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (12392 - 45694, n=56) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 45136, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
系统性能
根据PCMark 10,Zenbook 14X在应用性能方面处于领先地位,甚至可以在生产力方面领先于AMD的Ryzen 9。这不一定是英特尔Optane H10的功劳,下面关于固态硬盘的章节将说明这一点。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (4823 - 5814, n=9) | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1671 - 6414, n=102, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (8088 - 9955, n=9) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4599 - 10836, n=102, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (7826 - 9292, n=9) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2797 - 9852, n=102, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (4812 - 5878, n=9) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (973 - 6709, n=102, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (926 - 1502, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (962 - 1555, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (957 - 1593, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (746 - 1501, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5554 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (20032 - 65446, n=56) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11981 - 64946, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (23033 - 64524, n=56) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10258 - 64497, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21736 - 66791, n=56) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10533 - 66893, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG | |
Average of class Subnotebook (71.5 - 125, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (72.3 - 110, n=63) | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W | |
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED | |
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
来自英特尔的固态硬盘是Optane Memory H10,具有32GB缓存和1TB总存储空间。交货时大约有870GB。在AS固态硬盘的基准比较图中,英特尔的Optane在所有学科中都明显超过了SK Hynix和三星PM981。