结论 - 专为日常多媒体设计
惠普 17t 最吸引人的地方在于其 17.3 英寸 16:9 的大显示屏和相对实惠的 1000 美元左右的起售价。因此，对于预算有限的学生或家庭用户来说，这是一个很好的解决方案，他们可以利用更大的屏幕尺寸来播放视频、电子表格或其他 15 英寸屏幕可能太小的应用场景。同时，尽管该产品属于低端产品，电池容量较小，但其现代箭湖 U 系列 CPU 可确保良好的性能和运行时间。
它有几个缺点。由于目标受众是日常家庭用户或学生，他们不太可能关心 CPU 或固态硬盘性能节流的小问题，因此有几个缺点很容易被忽视，但缺少全 sRGB 色彩、集成 SD 读卡器或 1080p 触摸屏选项可能会让一些买家不高兴。联想 联想 V17提供了更深的色彩和 SD 读卡器，而 宏碁 Aspire 17包括一个独立的GeForce GPU，图形性能明显更快，但尺寸和重量与惠普几乎相同。因此，休闲游戏玩家或业余图形编辑人员可能会选择惠普 17。
Pros
+ 相对于其尺寸而言，起步价相对便宜
+ 对于如此小巧的电池来说，电池续航时间尚可
+ 可扩展 2x SODIMM 内存
+ 支持 USB-C PD 和 DP
+ 集成数字键盘
Cons
- 出厂时仍配备桶装交流适配器，而不是通用 USB-C
- CPU 和 SSD 性能在压力较大时可能会出现问题
- 触摸屏选项仅限于 900p 显示屏
- 图形性能有限
- 没有完整的 sRGB 色彩选项
$899.00
HP 17-CN500 Personal Laptop, 2025, 17.3" 1920x1080 IPS, Intel-12 Core Ultra 7 255U, 16GB DDR5, 512GB SSD, Win11 Pro, Backlit KB, Wi-Fi 6, BT 5.3, 720p HD Camera, Natural Silver
17t 是惠普产品组合中最经济实惠的 17 英寸笔记本电脑之一。它在功能和硬件方面低于Pavilion 、Envy 或 Spectre 系列，适合预算较紧的学生或家庭用户。我们上次评测的惠普 17 系统是几年前的 2020 版本从那时起，该系列已经发生了很大变化。
我们的测试机是一款高端配置，配备了箭湖酷睿Ultra 7 255U CPU、1080p 显示屏和 96GB 内存，售价约为 1600 美元。当然，大多数用户希望配置较少的内存，起价约为 1140 美元。其他型号可能会配备速度较慢的 Core Ultra 5 225U 或分辨率较低的 1600 x 900 显示屏，起价为 1000 美元。
惠普 17t 的竞争对手包括其他基本的多媒体笔记本电脑，如 联想 V17, 宏碁 Aspire 17或 华硕 Vivobook 系列.
更多惠普评论：
规格
HP 17t-cn500 (17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 255U 12 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 34 W PL2 / Short Burst, 16 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-U
Graphics adapter
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), Core: 1700 MHz, DDR5, 32.0.101.6556
Memory
96 GB
, Kingston, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 26-26-26-52
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei CMN1781, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Arrow Lake-U PCH
Storage
TeamGroup T-Force G50 TM8FFE004T, 4000 GB
Weight
2.089 kg, Power Supply: 308 g
Price
1150 USD
Amazon
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
作为一款经济型笔记本电脑，机身大部分是塑料材质。底座在扭转边角时会轻微翘起，而铰链本应更加坚固，以减少调节盖子时的晃动。好的一面是，磨砂表面能很好地隐藏指纹，整体尺寸与宏碁 Aspire 17 相比也很有竞争力。
该机型还有黑色版本可供选择。
交流
为了节省成本，RealTek RTL8852BE 不支持 Wi-Fi 6E 或 Wi-Fi 7。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
HP 17t-cn500; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø770 (666-850)
HP 17t-cn500; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø917 (887-944)
网络摄像头
标配 100 万像素网络摄像头和物理快门，可选配 200 万像素升级版。没有红外选项。
8 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
维护
橡胶脚垫下的 6 颗隐藏式螺丝增加了维修难度。进入机箱后，用户可以使用两个 DDR5 SODIMM 插槽、可拆卸 WLAN 模块，以及主固态硬盘占用的一个 PCIe4 x4 NVMe 插槽。
可持续性
部分底座、边框、扬声器和键帽采用海洋塑料和消费后再生塑料制造。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了桶装交流适配器和文件外，没有任何其他附件。如果在美国购买，制造商通常提供一年有限保修。
输入设备
按键反馈明显较轻，不像价格更高的 Envy、Spectre 或 EliteBook 系列那样坚固。尽管如此，大字体、易读和背光按键都是标准配置，打字体验在同价位产品中还算不错。
显示屏
奇美的 IPS 面板非常简单，sRGB 覆盖范围有限，亮度和黑白响应时间都很一般。作为一款廉价笔记本电脑，它的对比度出人意料地好，约为 1500:1，但适度的背光出血和狭窄的色彩空间也足以满足基本的多媒体使用要求。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chi Mei CMN1781 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 351.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 320.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20.3 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 338.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1612:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.08 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 2.57
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
45% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
65% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
43.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
CCT: 6768 K
| HP 17t-cn500 Chi Mei CMN1781, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 60 Hz | HP 17-ca1149ng Chi Mei CMN175E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 60 Hz | LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) LG Display LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 60 Hz | Lenovo V17 G4 IRU BOEhydis NV173FHM-N4K, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Lenovo LEN160WUM, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA NE160QDM-NX4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 144 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 37% | 89% | 47% | -10% | 64% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 43.5 | 61.4 41% | 96.88 123% | 69 59% | 39.1 -10% | 75.6 74% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 65 | 86.6 33% | 99.9 54% | 89.3 37% | 57.6 -11% | 98.3 51% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 45 | 62 38% | 85.01 89% | 65.3 45% | 40.4 -10% | 74.6 66% |
| Response Times | -27% | -57% | 34% | -1% | -12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 32.1 ? | 40 ? -25% | 49.2 ? -53% | 21.5 ? 33% | 31.9 ? 1% | 36.6 ? -14% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 20.1 ? | 26 ? -29% | 32.4 ? -61% | 13 ? 35% | 20.6 ? -2% | 21.9 ? -9% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 250 ? | |||||
| Screen | -0% | 18% | -26% | -16% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 338.6 | 327 -3% | 411 21% | 330 -3% | 349 3% | 387 14% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 321 | 287 -11% | 389 21% | 305 -5% | 332 3% | 401 25% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 85 | 80 -6% | 91 7% | 86 1% | 91 7% | 93 9% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.21 | 0.25 -19% | 0.35 -67% | 0.38 -81% | 0.33 -57% | 0.22 -5% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1612 | 1308 -19% | 1174 -27% | 868 -46% | 1058 -34% | 1759 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.08 | 4.03 21% | 1.8 65% | 7.36 -45% | 5.57 -10% | 4.4 13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.35 | 7.35 60% | 5.36 71% | 12.35 33% | 19.96 -9% | 8.5 54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.57 | 1.8 30% | 3.05 -19% | 4.52 -76% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 4.84 -24% | 2.2 44% | 6.5 -67% | 2.7 31% | 6.4 -64% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.39 92% | 2.275 97% | 2.077 106% | 2.129 103% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 6768 96% | 6850 95% | 7683 85% | 6656 98% | 7896 82% | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 56 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 87 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
4% | 17% /
23% | 18% /
-2% | -9% /
-12% | 20% /
17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 32.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。
处理器
酷睿至尊 7 255U 酷睿至尊 7 255UHP 17t 中的 Core Ultra 7 255U 只比老式的 酷睿至尊 7 155U的 Envy 17.这种微弱的差距可能是由于当 CPU 受到压力时，性能会相对急剧下降。例如，在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时，初始分数为 1490 分，仅运行 2 个周期后就会降至 982 分。
与 Lunar Lake 酷睿至尊 7 258V相比，Arrow Lake Core Ultra 7 255U 的价格更低，但传统性能和 AI 性能都更慢。其集成的 NPU 不符合 Co-Pilot+ 的要求。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
HP 17t-cn500 Intel Core Ultra 7 255U: Ø1113 (982.41-1490.31)
HP 17-ca1149ng AMD Ryzen 5 3500U: Ø588 (568.32-652.11)
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) Intel Core Ultra 7 258V: Ø1377 (1355.43-1546.19)
Lenovo V17 G4 IRU Intel Processor U300: Ø730 (710.19-780.61)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 AMD Ryzen AI 5 330: Ø1186 (1177.86-1190.62)
Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100: Ø1373 (1323.89-1404)
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA -2! | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng -4! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (8586 - 12157, n=3) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (1717 - 1915, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (3178 - 4714, n=3) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (657 - 738, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (1490 - 1957, n=3) | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (244 - 251, n=3) | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (315 - 418, n=3) | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (35887 - 44657, n=3) | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (5099 - 5227, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (9040 - 11075, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (2223 - 2523, n=3) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (7957 - 10220, n=3) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (1616 - 1859, n=3) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (6.6 - 13.1, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (47.3 - 60.5, n=3) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (0.4654 - 0.591, n=3) | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (2214 - 7908, n=3) | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (12867 - 42808, n=3) | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (653 - 2333, n=3) | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (13483 - 52445, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (1662 - 5756, n=3) | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (6395 - 21002, n=3) | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (13243 - 45286, n=3) | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (167.2 - 710, n=3) | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (1014 - 4201, n=3) | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (13398 - 50233, n=3) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
系统性能
与大多数其他经济型笔记本电脑相比，AIDA64 内存性能偏慢，延迟更高。这是因为我们的具体机型配置了两根 48GB 内存条，以牺牲性能换取更大容量。
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA -4! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 -1! | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU -4! | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng -5! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (5911 - 6610, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (9707 - 11221, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (8600 - 8883, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (6715 - 7865, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (1482 - 1812, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (1438 - 1744, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (1583 - 1920, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (1331 - 1707, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (277 - 290, n=3) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (232 - 254, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (532 - 603, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 5911 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (21887 - 87149, n=3) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (19699 - 66912, n=3) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (17473 - 61273, n=3) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255U (139 - 536, n=3) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
PCIe4 x4 T-Force 固态硬盘的传输速率最高可达 5300 MB/s，并能维持几分钟，然后稳定降至 2400 MB/s，如下图 DiskSpd 循环测试结果所示。随着时间的推移，散热器可能会提高性能，但 17t 毕竟是一款经济型笔记本电脑。
TeamGroup T-Force G50 TM8FFE004T
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
4806 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
4550 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
381 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
347.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3159 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3639 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
62.33 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
135.6 MB/s
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
HP 17t-cn500 TeamGroup T-Force G50 TM8FFE004T; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3929 (2295.57-5247.49)
Lenovo V17 G4 IRU WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3783 (1927.49-4650.43)
图形处理器性能
图形性能与集成 弧形 4 核与 Iris Xe 96 EUs最相似。对于像《DOTA 2》这样要求不高的游戏来说，它已经足够了，但对于大多数 3D 游戏来说，它还是太慢了。
| 性能参数 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 4614 | 12262 | 1332 |
| 均衡模式 | 4399 (-5%) | 12196 (-1%) | 1194 (-10%) |
| 电池电量 | 1316 (-71%) | 11579 (-6%) | 570 (-57%) |
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G -1! | |
| LG Gram 17 (2023) | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA -1! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2023) | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (4520 - 7109, n=26) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6352 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 19487 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4002 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2144 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender | |
| v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (512 - 1156, n=28) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (312 - 423, n=10) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| v4.3 Barbershop CPU | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (2917 - 3872, n=4) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| LG Gram 17 (2023) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG Gram 17 (2023) | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2023) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG Gram 17 (2023) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Lenovo V17 G4 IRU | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Acer Aspire 17 A17-51GM-70LZ | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2023) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP 17t-cn500 | |
| HP 17-ca1149ng | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
HP 17t-cn500 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake): Ø12.1 (8.75-13.4)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 103.9 | 72 | 23 | 9.51 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 79.9 | 63.7 | 47.6 | 45.6 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 41.3 | 22.9 | 17 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 28.1 | 23.2 | 20.3 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 99.3 | 44.2 | 36.1 | 29.5 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 18.7 | 15 | 14 | 13.6 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 19.2 | 16.4 | 13.5 | 11.8 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 35.7 | 31.6 | 24.3 | 7.48 |
排放量
系统噪音
浏览或视频流时，内部风扇通常很安静，偶尔会偶尔出现短暂的尖峰。当运行游戏等要求较高的负载时，风扇的最高噪音略低于 42 dB(A)，比 2020 年的 HP 17 更大。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.3 / 23.3 / 31.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 41.8 / 38.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) | ||
| HP 17t-cn500 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | HP 17-ca1149ng R5 3500U, Vega 8 | LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Lenovo V17 G4 IRU U300, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 330, Radeon 820M | Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -10% | -10% | 1% | -2% | 6% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.2 | 25.1 -8% | 24 -3% | 24 -3% | 23.2 -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.3 | 30.8 -32% | 25.1 -8% | 24 -3% | 24 -3% | 23.2 -0% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.3 | 30.8 -32% | 26.1 -12% | 26 -12% | 25 -7% | 23.2 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 31.8 | 30.8 3% | 29.7 7% | 28 12% | 26 18% | 23.2 27% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 41.8 | 37.7 10% | 34 19% | 43 -3% | 28.3 32% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 39.9 | 46.4 -16% | 42 -5% | 38.4 4% | ||
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 38.7 | 37.7 3% | 46.6 -20% | 41 -6% | 43 -11% | 47.6 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于散热解决方案的设计，笔记本电脑左半部分的温度明显高于右半部分。当长时间运行高负载时，WASD 键的热点温度可高达 40 摄氏度，而数字键盘的温度仅为 30 摄氏度。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+1.3 °C / 2.4 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+1.3 °C / 2.4 F).
| HP 17t-cn500 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | HP 17-ca1149ng R5 3500U, Vega 8 | LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Lenovo V17 G4 IRU U300, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 330, Radeon 820M | Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 20% | 15% | 3% | 14% | 13% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 39 | 34.2 12% | 41 -5% | 42 -8% | 35 10% | 39.1 -0% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 40.6 | 33 19% | 38 6% | 45 -11% | 37 9% | 37.1 9% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 32.6 | 24.5 25% | 23.3 29% | 26 20% | 26 20% | 25.7 21% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 32 | 24.5 23% | 23 28% | 28 12% | 27 16% | 25.4 21% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力时，CPU 会在数秒内将频率提升至 2.3 GHz、33 W 和 95 C，然后再将频率循环至 0.9 GHz 至 1.3 GHz、69 C 至 77 C 和 15 W 至 20 W，从而将温度保持在更易于管理的水平。受压时的循环时钟频率证实了我们上述关于循环 CineBench R15 xT 分数的观察结果。
| CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | ||
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 55 | |
| Prime95 压力 | 0.9 - 1.3 | -- | 69 - 77 | |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 0.5 | 5700 | 70 | |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.4 | 1700 | 65 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP 17t-cn500 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
惠普 17t 与 2020 惠普 17 在相同的 45 瓦功率包络线下运行，但性能更快，每瓦性能显著提高。例如，两款系统在游戏时的功耗均为 40 瓦左右，但根据游戏的不同，17t 的性能可提高 80% 至 150%。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 1 Watt |
| Idle | 4.4 / 8 / 9.1 Watt |
| Load |
36.3 / 45.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP 17t-cn500 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), TeamGroup T-Force G50 TM8FFE004T, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP 17-ca1149ng R5 3500U, Vega 8, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Lenovo V17 G4 IRU U300, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 330, Radeon 820M, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -30% | -18% | 0% | -7% | 27% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.4 | 6 -36% | 4.1 7% | 4 9% | 5.2 -18% | 2.9 34% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 8 | 12.5 -56% | 8.3 -4% | 5 37% | 6 25% | 5.8 27% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 9.1 | 12.9 -42% | 12.5 -37% | 12 -32% | 7.7 15% | 7.1 22% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 36.3 | 41 -13% | 31 15% | 44 -21% | 18.5 49% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 35.4 | 40.4 -14% | 17 52% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 38.7 | 48.1 -24% | 43 -11% | 19.1 51% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 45.6 | 46 -1% | 60.7 -33% | 58 -27% | 58 -27% | 65.7 -44% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
HP 17t-cn500 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø37.4 (33.4-45.6)
Lenovo V17 G4 IRU U300, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø36.9 (33.1-58.3)
HP 17t-cn500 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.85 (4.56-11.3)
Lenovo V17 G4 IRU U300, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.95 (3.9-12)
HP 17t-cn500 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø38.7 (37.8-39.9)
外部显示器功耗
HP 17t-cn500 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø32.5 (27.5-44.8)
Lenovo V17 G4 IRU U300, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø31.2 (29.7-50.1)
HP 17t-cn500 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø39.8 (27.8-46.5)
Lenovo V17 G4 IRU U300, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø32.7 (29.9-46.4)
HP 17t-cn500 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø39.2 (37.8-42.2)
Lenovo V17 G4 IRU U300, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø26 (25.4-28.5)
HP 17t-cn500 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.19 (3.37-9.84)
Lenovo V17 G4 IRU U300, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.08 (2.41-10.4)
HP 17t-cn500 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø35.4 (34.7-36.9)
电池寿命
对于一款 17 英寸机型来说，电池容量较小，仅为 40 Wh。WLAN 运行时间为 5.5 小时，还算不错，但低于同类机型，如 联想 V17但仍比 2020 年的惠普 17 长。
| HP 17t-cn500 Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), 41 Wh | HP 17-ca1149ng R5 3500U, Vega 8, 41.7 Wh | LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 77 Wh | Lenovo V17 G4 IRU U300, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 45 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 330, Radeon 820M, 60 Wh | Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 70 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -12% | 291% | 30% | 88% | 246% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 5.6 | 4.9 -12% | 21.9 291% | 7.3 30% | 10.5 88% | 19.4 246% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 11 | |||||
| H.264 (h) | 6.4 | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.1 |
笔记本检查评级
搭载酷睿 U 系列处理器的基本型多媒体笔记本电脑，配备大屏幕，起售价相对较低。
HP 17t-cn500
- 11/14/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 72.2%  | HP 17t-cn500 Intel Core Ultra 7 255U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) ⎘ 96 GB Memory, 4000 GB SSD | Amazon: $899.00 List Price: 1150 USD | 2.1 kg | 19.8 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
2. 78.6% v7 (old)  | HP 17-ca1149ng AMD Ryzen 5 3500U ⎘ AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $19.99 for HP 17-ca1133nb 17-ca1136... 2. $57.99 Power4Laptops AC Adapter Lap... 3. $57.99 Power4Laptops DC Adapter Lap... List Price: 799 Euro | 2.5 kg | 24.5 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
3. 84.8%  | LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $1,649.85 List Price: 2000€ | 1.4 kg | 17.8 mm | 17.00" 2560x1600 178 PPI IPS |
4. 76.5%  | Lenovo V17 G4 IRU Intel Processor U300 ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.99 65W 45W Charger Compatible w... 2. $16.99 65W Round tip Charger for Le... 3. $16.49 65W 45W Laptop Charger Fit f... List Price: 450 EUR | 2.1 kg | 20 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
5. 80.8%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 ⎘ AMD Radeon 820M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $749.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP1... 2. $575.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5, 16" W... 3. $699.00 Lenovo 2025 IdeaPad Slim 5 L... List Price: 600 EUR | 1.9 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
6. 84%  | Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $989.99 ASUS Vivobook S16 Laptop, Co... 2. $20.43 Alapmk Protective Case for A... 3. $25.54 Laptop Case Cover for ASUS V... List Price: 899€ | 1.8 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
