判决
诚然，LG Gram 的外观又一年保持不变。秉承 "永不改变制胜法宝 "的信条，LG Gram 只是对硬件进行了更新，使其与时俱进。因此，显示屏和扬声器也没有更新。
目前的 Gram 采用的是 Lunar Lake 处理器。虽然这款处理器的计算能力可能不是最高的，但它提供了强大的 iGPU，最重要的是，它非常节能。这使得 LG Gram 17 除了具有强大的图形性能外，还能实现出色的电池运行时间和低功耗。
在尺寸方面，LG Gram 17 依然是办公笔记本电脑中的佼佼者。在同类产品中，很少有人能提供 17 英寸的大屏幕。不过，与竞争对手相比，Gram 不再是绝对的轻量级产品。目前，有太多 16 英寸机型的重量略高于一公斤，宏碁甚至宣布推出一款重量低于一公斤的 16 英寸笔记本电脑。这无疑使 LG 高端笔记本电脑的竞争更加激烈。尽管如此，LG Gram 17 仍然是一款有趣而引人注目的设备。
Pros
+ 轻巧便携的设计
+ 高品质 IPS 显示屏
+ Wi-Fi 7 和雷电 4
+ 22 小时实际运行时间
Cons
- 外壳稍有弯曲
- 价格相对较高
$1,549.99
LG gram AI Powered Laptop 17.0" Touchscreen LCD WQXGA Display (Intel Ultra 7-258V, 32GB LPDDR5X, 2TB PCIe SSD, Intel Arc, Backlit KB, Fingerprint, 2 Thunderbolt 4, Win 11 Pro) w/DKZ USB Port Expander
规格
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) (Gram 17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V 8 x 2.2 - 4.8 GHz, Lunar Lake
Graphics adapter
Memory
32 GB
, DDR5-8533
Display
17.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 178 PPI, LG Display LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Storage
M.2 PCIe 2 x ESO01TBHLCJ-EL1-2AK
Weight
1.389 kg, Power Supply: 154 g
Price
2000 Euro
Amazon
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
住房和设备
由于 Gram 的外壳只做了微小的改动，我们建议您看看我们前几年的评测。从 LG Gram 17（2023 年）到 LG Gram 17（2024）所带来的变化远远大于目前 25 年机型的更新。
不过，LG 确实调整了当前 Gram 的功能设置。我们的测试机缺少了读卡器--读卡器的插槽还在，但被一块内部塑料片遮住了。同样，带有面部识别功能的网络摄像头也被一个标准的全高清网络摄像头所取代。生物识别登录现在由集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器处理。
最新的英特尔 BE201 模块确保了快速无线连接。
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL); iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø2329 (2139-2349)
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL); iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø2281 (2170-2345)
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1911 (1799-2000)
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1753 (1556-1804)
17.2 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
可持续性
多年来，LG Gram 设备的包装基本不使用塑料。该设备已通过 EPEAT 认证，还提供笔记本电脑拆解指南 (PDF 下载)。).但遗憾的是，我们无法在制造商的网站上找到产品碳足迹（PCF）文件。
Gram 的内部结构模块化程度不高。不过，电池、扬声器和风扇等部件并不是粘在一起的。这意味着它们很容易更换。
输入设备
Gram 17 的触摸板和键盘依然出色。键盘键程较浅是其最大的缺陷。不过，按压点非常清晰，提供了极佳的触觉反馈，有助于快速键入。大块玻璃触摸板表面光滑，提供了多点触控输入设备应有的所有便利。
显示屏
LG 也没有对显示屏进行任何改动。与 2024 机型一样，该机采用 LP170WQ1 面板，像素为 2,560 × 1,600。在 Display-P3 色彩空间中，该面板具有良好的对比度和较强的色彩表现力。像往常一样，LG 显示器的预设白点是欧洲北部和美洲较冷的日光白（D75）。实际上，标准的白点是较暖的 D65。不过，色温可以在 MyGram 应用程序中进行调整。将色温调高两档，就能获得 D65 白点，因此在我们的标准化测试中几乎不会出现明显的色彩偏差。
新款 LG Gram 17 屏幕最大的诟病是响应时间太短。对于办公笔记本电脑来说，响应时间已经足够了。2023 年的 Gram 17 评测中展示了可视角度分析和户外使用时的图像。这台笔记本电脑拥有相同的面板。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Display LP170WQ1-SPF2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 411 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 388.8 cd/m² Minimum: 29 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 411 cd/m²
Contrast: 1174:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 1.8
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
85.01% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
96.88% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.275
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) LG Display LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 60 Hz | LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G LG DISPLAY LP160WQ2-SPF1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 144 Hz | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G LG Display LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17", 60 Hz | Medion S17431-MD62640 BOE08D3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 60 Hz | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA NE160QDM-NX4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 144 Hz | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V SDC41B6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K B160UAN04.3 (AUOA5AB), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -0% | -21% | -16% | 5% | -54% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 96.88 | 97.96 1% | 96.3 -1% | 65.17 -33% | 68.5 -29% | 99.9 3% | 36.8 -62% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 91.89 -8% | 98.3 -2% | 100 0% | 55.3 -45% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 85.01 | 86.65 2% | 85.1 0% | 66.35 -22% | 69.4 -18% | 94.6 11% | 38 -55% |
| Response Times | 6% | 36% | 47% | 37% | 67% | 31% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 49.2 ? | 47 ? 4% | 25 ? 49% | 26.8 ? 46% | 35.6 ? 28% | 4.8 ? 90% | 36 ? 27% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 32.4 ? | 30 ? 7% | 25 ? 23% | 17.2 ? 47% | 17.5 ? 46% | 18 ? 44% | 21.4 ? 34% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 481 | ||||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 39 | ||||||
| Screen | 43% | -48% | -25% | -11% | 224% | -85% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 411 | 442 8% | 420 2% | 372 -9% | 413 0% | 425 3% | 326 -21% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 389 | 406 4% | 387 -1% | 341 -12% | 408 5% | 421 8% | 303 -22% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 86 -5% | 88 -3% | 87 -4% | 94 3% | 98 8% | 89 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.35 | 0.17 51% | 0.34 3% | 0.38 -9% | 0.2 43% | 0.0219 94% | 0.24 31% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1174 | 2600 121% | 1235 5% | 979 -17% | 2065 76% | 19406 1553% | 1358 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 0.84 53% | 4.32 -140% | 3.34 -86% | 3.6 -100% | 1.73 4% | 6.48 -260% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.36 | 1.62 70% | 8.55 -60% | 6.69 -25% | 7.1 -32% | 3.82 29% | 19.42 -262% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.8 | 0.88 51% | 1.27 29% | 1.66 8% | 1.5 17% | 4.92 -173% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.53 30% | 8.04 -265% | 3.7 -68% | 4.6 -109% | 0.09 96% | 3.85 -75% |
| Gamma | 2.275 97% | 2.173 101% | 2.224 99% | 2.33 94% | 2.25 98% | 2.346 94% | 2.79 79% |
| CCT | 6496 100% | 8114 80% | 6816 95% | 7461 87% | 6432 101% | 6739 96% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17% /
28% | -4% /
-26% | 0% /
-14% | 3% /
-5% | 99% /
149% | -36% /
-62% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
凭借 Lunar Lake 处理器，英特尔在处理器设计方面取得了新的突破。这里的重点不是多线程，而是卓越的能效。这些处理器的内存直接集成在处理器封装中，这限制了可用的内存配置。目前，采用 Lunar Lake 处理器的 Gram 机型只能配备 Core Ultra 7 256V 或 258V。这就意味着配置 16 GB 或 32 GB 内存。我们的测试机采用的是 32 GB 配置。此外，市场上还有各种存储配置可供选择。我们的设备配备了两个 NVMe 固态硬盘，每个可提供 1 TB 的存储空间。
测试条件
在 MyGram 应用程序中，预设了四种不同的性能配置文件。这些预设值从（几乎）静音风扇到高风扇利用率不等。然而，我们在压力测试的噪音测量中发现，在苛刻的场景下，"正常 "设置和 "高 "冷却模式的噪音仅相差一到两 dB(A)。因此，我们选择在所有基准测试和测量中使用最强的冷却模式。
处理器
从 Core Ultra 7 155H的 前代转换到新的 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 258V(Lunar Lake）的前身，结果有好有坏。
单核性能优势明显，在基准测试中获得了明显的提升。然而，多核性能却截然不同：新版 Gram 17 在这方面略微落后于前代产品。这是 Lunar Lake 架构的典型表现，因为英特尔选择省略同时多线程（SMT）。
LG 积极缓解了这一不足。2025 型号采用了经过大幅改进的双风扇散热系统。这使得处理器在持续使用时的功耗比前代机型高出约 10 瓦，同时运行温度也更低。因此，多核差距比预期的要小。特别是在长时间负载的情况下，新款 Gram 更显优势。
在与当前其他笔记本电脑的总体比较中，Gram 的基准性能仍然低于平均水平，这也是典型的情况。该设备的重点仍然是便携性，而不是最大计算能力。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) Intel Core Ultra 7 258V: Ø1377 (1355.43-1546.19)
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel Core Ultra 7 256V: Ø1518 (1499.42-1627.14)
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1375 (1298.66-2049.39)
Medion S17431-MD62640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2342 (2318.03-2383.51)
Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Intel Core Ultra 5 225H: Ø2342 (2293.31-2626.4)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V: Ø1497 (1473.84-1582.72)
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2019 (1940.52-2419.4)
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Office (1577 - 22808, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (7920 - 11097, n=24) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1664 - 1957, n=24) | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office (708 - 2130, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 8840, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (3130 - 4314, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (643 - 749, n=23) | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office (285 - 815, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 3380, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1280 - 1656, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (258 - 298, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office (99.5 - 312, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Office (158 - 1956, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (315 - 452, n=23) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Office (7532 - 76886, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (28482 - 36724, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (5265 - 5869, n=23) | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office (3046 - 6497, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (8964 - 11334, n=23) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average of class Office (757 - 17846, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2593 - 2795, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Office (462 - 2894, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (7574 - 9918, n=23) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average of class Office (1532 - 16999, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1891 - 2046, n=23) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office (510 - 2128, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9.65 - 14.2, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average of class Office (1.72 - 26, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Office (41.5 - 129.6, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (41.1 - 59.3, n=23) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Office (0.4098 - 1.06, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (0.443 - 0.4998, n=23) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Office (1685 - 31245, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (8454 - 12781, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (40875 - 63401, n=23) | |
| Average of class Office (8977 - 125394, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 5755, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1930 - 2817, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Office (20636 - 115197, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (48816 - 49818, n=23) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office (1064 - 18321, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (3817 - 4440, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (21670 - 33565, n=23) | |
| Average of class Office (4415 - 66922, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (30957 - 40753, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office (138.6 - 1366, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (422 - 632, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Office (859 - 17834, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4258 - 6930, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (44223 - 55458, n=23) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office (11090 - 65229, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
系统性能
与纯粹的处理器性能相比，Gram 17 在一般系统性能方面表现更好。在这方面，该设备轻松跻身中游。这主要归功于两块高速固态硬盘和系统出色的持续性能。
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G -1! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 7314, n=22) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office (2823 - 7735, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 11467, n=22) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Office (6567 - 11594, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9619, n=22) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average of class Office (3041 - 10925, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (8914 - 10308, n=22) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office (2049 - 12660, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1551 - 1742, n=21) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Office (348 - 2010, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1479 - 1684, n=21) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Office (393 - 1880, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1727 - 1977, n=21) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Office (319 - 2361, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1246 - 1411, n=21) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average of class Office (258 - 1877, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (219 - 317, n=21) | |
| Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (199.5 - 291, n=21) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Office (391 - 1966, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (468 - 559, n=23) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6420 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (104408 - 114336, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office (20075 - 109192, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89417, n=23) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office (10084 - 128030, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (108842 - 117989, n=23) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Average of class Office (20073 - 117989, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Average of class Office (7.6 - 162.9, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95 - 101.1, n=23) | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Sequential Read:
3844MB/s
Sequential Write:
3085MB/s
4K Read:
44.4MB/s
4K Write:
140.7MB/s
4K-64 Read:
736MB/s
4K-64 Write:
1205MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.132ms
Access Time Write:
0.029ms
Score Read:
1164Points
Score Write:
1654Points
Score Total:
3385Points
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5212 (4548.3-5234.07)
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3024 (2607.57-3618.53)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5908 (4197.02-6315.36)
图形处理器性能
在我们的测试中，Intel Arc Graphics 140V 集成显卡取得了不错的成绩。只要对细节设置和分辨率进行相应调整，即使是要求更高的游戏，它也足以胜任。
总体而言，Gram 17 的表现令人信服。值得注意的是，它在图形基准测试中的表现要略高于价格更高的 LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS。可能的原因包括英特尔驱动程序的改进，以及我们测试机的内存容量更大（与 Gram Pro 相比）。
无论如何，与前代产品 Core Ultra 7 155H 中的 Arc 8 核 iGPU 相比，性能的提升是显著的。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11914 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 193843 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32311 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8907 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4396 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 803 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3142 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Office (6.13 - 29.6, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Office (6.83 - 31.6, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Medion S17431-MD62640 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V: Ø25.2 (22.9-28)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 140.5 | 140.9 | 68.2 | 27.8 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 36.5 | 35.7 | 36 | 35.8 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 82.2 | 43.2 | 35.3 | 26.4 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 43.2 | 36.4 | 33.4 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 232 | 71.4 | 69.7 | 62 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 25.4 | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 37.2 | 23.2 | 24.3 | ||
| F1 25 (2025) | 76.6 | 62 | 47.6 | 12.9 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
Gram 17 的噪音水平在很大程度上取决于所选的功率模式。我们测试了所有可用模式。
在负载情况下，例如在压力测试中，"高 "和 "正常 "模式的噪音明显超过 40 分贝。而 "静音 "模式则比较保守，音量在 36 到 38 分贝之间。即使在 "静音 "运行模式下，风扇也会转动，但噪音远低于 30 分贝，几乎听不到。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25.1 / 26.1 / 29.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| / 46.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.1 dB(A) | ||
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V | LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB | Medion S17431-MD62640 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7 | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Arc 130T, Ultra 5 225H, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Arc 140V, Core Ultra 9 288V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Radeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 10% | 1% | 15% | 4% | 11% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25.1 | 25.2 -0% | 24.95 1% | 23 8% | 23.2 8% | 25.8 -3% | 23 8% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.1 | 25.2 -0% | 24.95 1% | 28.51 -14% | 23.2 8% | 25.8 -3% | 23 8% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 26.1 | 25.2 3% | 24.95 4% | 28.51 -9% | 23.2 11% | 25.8 1% | 23 12% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 29.7 | 27.7 7% | 25.3 15% | 28.51 4% | 23.2 22% | 26.7 10% | 24.67 17% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 46.4 | 42.6 8% | 42.76 8% | 35.4 24% | 44.4 4% | 41.53 10% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 46.6 | 42.7 8% | 32 31% | 42.76 8% | 38.8 17% | 41.1 12% | 42.51 9% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 38.54 | 26.3 | 31.72 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘表面确实会变得很热，但绝不会热到让人打字乏味的地步。
温度的变化显然取决于所选的性能模式。特别是在 "静音 "运行模式下，外壳会随着时间的推移明显变热，直到风扇最终介入（几乎听不到声音）。即使在最大散热性能的压力测试中，Gram 也不能完全保持低温。
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 20.5 °C / 69 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 21 °C / 69.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+6.6 °C / 11.9 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 20.5 °C / 69 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 21 °C / 69.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+6.6 °C / 11.9 F).
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Medion S17431-MD62640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -15% | -15% | -33% | -14% | -6% | -11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 41 | 40.5 1% | 40.1 2% | 51 -24% | 40.7 1% | 37.9 8% | 48 -17% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 38 | 45 -18% | 42.9 -13% | 48 -26% | 47.8 -26% | 31.5 17% | 51 -34% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 23.3 | 27.1 -16% | 26.8 -15% | 31 -33% | 26 -12% | 28.3 -21% | 22 6% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 23 | 28.8 -25% | 31.1 -35% | 34 -48% | 27 -17% | 29.7 -29% | 23 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
扬声器的音质比上一代机型略好。因此，LG 继续保持良好的音质。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
Lunar Lake 与高能效 IPS 面板的结合，自然会降低闲置和轻负载时的能耗。
然而，在执行要求较高的任务时，情况就不一样了：在这种情况下，Gram 会消耗大量电能。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.17 / 0.553 Watt |
| Idle | 4.1 / 8.3 / 12.5 Watt |
| Load |
/ 60.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Medion S17431-MD62640 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Phison PS5019-E19 SSO1TBITC4-E19-V7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | 17% | -46% | -7% | -1% | -9% | 18% | 7% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.1 | 4.15 -1% | 3.4 17% | 10.3 -151% | 4.7 -15% | 5.7 -39% | 4.7 -15% | 3.69 ? 10% | 4.53 ? -10% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 8.3 | 5.4 35% | 6.1 27% | 11.2 -35% | 9.7 -17% | 7.4 11% | 8.2 1% | 6.22 ? 25% | 7.43 ? 10% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 12.5 | 12.4 1% | 9.9 21% | 11.7 6% | 10.1 19% | 7.9 37% | 9 28% | 8.09 ? 35% | 8.83 ? 29% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 48.1 | 48.2 -0% | 53.8 -12% | 50.3 -5% | 49.8 -4% | 65 -35% | |||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 60.7 | 60.049 1% | 60 1% | 83 -37% | 69.6 -15% | 65.41 -8% | 74 -22% | 61 ? -0% | 62.6 ? -3% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 48.1 | 46.9 | 50.9 | 58 | |||||
| Load Average * (Watt) | 31.29 | 44.2 | 59 | 39.6 ? | 41.3 ? | ||||
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 40.9 |
* ... smaller is better
赛博朋克能量/压力测试
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø52.5 (47.8-60.7)
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.22 (4.45-8.98)
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø48.1 (44.8-55.5)
电池寿命
77 瓦时的电池确保了高续航能力。在 WiFi 网上冲浪测试中，Gram 实现了长达 22 小时的超长续航。这意味着，在没有电源插座的情况下，Gram 可以轻松完成一整天的办公或短途商务旅行。
| LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 77 Wh | LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 77 Wh | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 77 Wh | Medion S17431-MD62640 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, 50 Wh | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 42 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -11% | -30% | -61% | -59% | -40% | -69% | -44% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 21.9 | 19.6 -11% | 15.3 -30% | 8.5 -61% | 8.9 -59% | 13.2 -40% | 6.8 -69% | 12.3 ? -44% |
| Load (h) | 2.3 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 1.851 ? | ||||
| H.264 (h) | 6.8 | 14.9 ? |
LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL)
- 11/07/2025 v8
Marc Herter
Office - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 84.8%  | LG gram 17 2025 (17Z90TL) Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $1,549.99 List Price: 2000€ | 1.4 kg | 17.8 mm | 17.00" 2560x1600 178 PPI IPS |
2. 83.9%  | LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,451.00 LG gram Pro 16-inch 2in1 Thi... 2. $2,597.00 LG gram Pro 16-inch Lightwei... 3. $2,230.97 LG gram Pro 16-inch Lightwei... List Price: 2050€ | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
3. 87% v7 (old)  | LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,699.99 LG Gram 17Z90S Laptop 2024, ... 2. $1,649.99 LG gram 17-inch Lightweight ... 3. $15.99 ANFRLE 65W Charger Compatibl... | 1.3 kg | 18.1 mm | 17.00" 2560x1600 178 PPI IPS |
4. 77%  | Medion S17431-MD62640 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 999 Euro | 2.1 kg | 20 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 81 PPI IPS |
5. 84.4%  | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Intel Core Ultra 5 225H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130T ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $91.81 A-Tech 16GB Kit (2x8GB) RAM ... 2. $34.99 Laptop Case Cover Sleeve for... 3. $13.99 IFIXAI Lower Bottom Base Cov... List Price: 1300€ | 1.7 kg | 18 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
6. 85.3%  | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 1.5 kg | 15.95 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
7. 77.6%  | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $6.95 2PCS Keyboard Cover for ASUS... 2. $519.49 ASUS Vivobook 16 Laptop, 16�... 3. $10.99 3 Pack Anti Glare Matte Scre... | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
