Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarLG Gram 17 (2022)回顾。轻巧的办公笔记本电脑，拥有大显示屏和出色的电池寿命
重量低（1,350克）、出色的电池寿命和哑光16:10显示屏是LG Gram 17（2022）的亮点。我们的数据库不包含任何直接竞争对手。现有的17英寸机更笨重或更重，而且它们通常有16：9的显示屏。更广泛的竞争包括以下设备 三星Galaxy Book Pro 15，以及华为MateBook D 16，以及Honor MagicBook 16和联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6.
LG Gram 17 (2022) (Gram 17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-1240P 12 x 1.2 - 4.4 GHz, 43 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Core: 1300 MHz, dual-channel, 30.0.101.1369
Memory
16 GB
, LPDDR5-5200, dual-channel mode, onboard, no memory slots
Display
17.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 178 PPI, LG Philips LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB
, 2x M.2-2280 (PCIe 4), 409 GB free
Weight
1.35 kg, Power Supply: 286 g
Price
1 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.3 % | 08/2022 | LG Gram 17 (2022) i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87.3 % | 12/2021 | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.1 kg | 11.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.6 % | 07/2022 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 82.2 % | 04/2022 | Honor MagicBook 16 2022 R5 5600H, Vega 7 | 1.8 kg | 18.2 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86 % | 08/2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450 | 1.9 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
外壳、连接、键盘 - 没有变化
端口配置（包括2个Thunderbolt 4）、键盘（背光）和紧凑、轻巧的镁合金外壳与上一代产品相同。 前代产品一样.机箱应该更加坚硬。打开机箱是件麻烦事。大部分需要松开才能取下底盖的螺丝都被粘在上面的垫子遮住了（见图片），两个圆形橡胶脚后面还有更多的螺丝（也是粘在上面）。键盘（背光）适合日常使用，在打字时有点晃动，但其按键提供了一个彻底的愉快的压力点。
关于这些主题的更多信息，你可以在我们的 2021 Gram 17的评论中找到更多关于这些主题的信息.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Office (8 - 82.7, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 90.5, n=43, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
LG Gram 17 (2022) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1287 (1132-1460)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1372 (1168-1507)
LG Gram 17 (2022) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1711 (1581-1736)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1376-1661)
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1327 (1281-1360)
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1452 (1353-1496)
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1370 (1262-1420)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1289-1364)
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1083 (699-1362)
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1196 (1104-1240)
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 Qualcomm WCN685x; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1075 (553-1190)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1367 (960-1479)
11.5 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
14 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
7 ∆E
显示屏 - LG笔记本电脑，16:10的哑光面板
与前代机型的光亮表面相比，2022 Gram采用了哑光模式。16:10格式的17英寸显示屏（2,560x1,600像素）的亮度（352.9cd/m²）和对比度（1,333:1）符合各自的目标。在电池供电的情况下，最大亮度下降了一些。很好。没有检测到PWM闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LP170WQ1-SPF2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 400 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 352.9 cd/m² Minimum: 24 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 346 cd/m²
Contrast: 1333:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.44
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
85.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
| LG Gram 17 (2022) LG Philips LP170WQ1-SPF2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US Samsung ATNA56YX02-0, AMOLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 BOE NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Honor MagicBook 16 2022 NV161FHM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | -19% | -17% | -3% | -13% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 98.1 | 87.6 -11% | 66.2 -33% | 68.4 -30% | 93 -5% | 74 -25% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 96.4 -4% | 98.9 -1% | 98.8 -1% | 98.7 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.9 | 99.3 16% | 68.3 -20% | 68.6 -20% | 83.9 -2% | 74.5 -13% |
| Response Times | 92% | 18% | 54% | -4% | 65% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46 ? | 1.9 ? 96% | 30.5 ? 34% | 16.8 ? 63% | 47 ? -2% | 13 ? 72% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 19 ? | 2.2 ? 88% | 18.7 ? 2% | 10.4 ? 45% | 20 ? -5% | 8 ? 58% |
| PWM Frequency | 59 | |||||
| Screen | 6% | -3% | 2% | -7% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 400 | 296.8 -26% | 319 -20% | 342 -14% | 404 1% | 356 -11% |
| Brightness | 353 | 298 -16% | 317 -10% | 329 -7% | 323 -8% | 322 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 98 21% | 90 11% | 92 14% | 73 -10% | 80 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.23 23% | 0.29 3% | 0.425 -42% | 0.27 10% | |
| Contrast | 1333 | 1387 4% | 1179 -12% | 951 -29% | 1319 -1% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.15 | 3.07 3% | 3.4 -8% | 3.2 -2% | 3.46 -10% | 2.4 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.54 | 5.29 19% | 8.1 -24% | 5.5 16% | 5.23 20% | 4.42 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.44 | 0.8 44% | 0.9 37% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 2.6 35% | 5.7 -43% | 4.5 -13% | 3.12 22% | 2.81 30% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.26 97% | 2.1 105% | 2.22 99% | 2.46 89% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 7278 89% | 6904 94% | 7433 87% | 7610 85% | 7114 91% | 6294 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 33% /
20% | -1% /
-3% | 13% /
6% | -5% /
-5% | 20% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
显示器显示了非常体面的色彩再现。在3.15的数值下，偏差只是刚刚错过了目标（Delta E < 3）--对观看者来说是无法感知的。校准确保了更平衡的灰度，并将色彩偏差减少到1.44。该显示器几乎可以完全再现sRGB（99.9%）和DCI-P3（98%）色彩空间，86%的AdobeRGB色彩空间得到再现。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |    | |
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
视角稳定的IPS面板在任何位置都能看清。在阳光不太强烈的情况下，屏幕内容可以在户外阅读。
性能--LG对17Z90Q进行了Alder Lake升级处理
A酷睿i5-1240P处理器，16GB内存（LPDDR5-5200）和512GB固态硬盘，使这台笔记本电脑适合办公和互联网使用。还有其他配置变体可供选择。例如，Gram型号配备了一个酷睿i7-1260PCPU的Gram型号。
测试条件
Gram的四种冷却模式对冷却、噪音和CPU的功率限制都有影响。这些模式可以通过预装的LG智能助手程序来选择。我们的测试是在 "正常 "模式（=标准模式）下进行的。
| 高 | 正常 | 低 | 无声 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 功率限制1 | 28 W | 25 W | 12 W | 8 W |
| 功率限制2 | 43 W | 43 W | 43 W | 43 W |
下面的图片显示了LG智能助手和LG更新与恢复工具。这些是笔记本电脑的中央配置和备份/恢复程序，你应该熟悉。
处理器
芯片酷睿i5-1240P处理器（Alder Lake）由四个性能核心（超线程，1.7至4.4 GHz）和八个效率核心（无超线程，1.2至3.3 GHz）组成。这导致总共有16个逻辑CPU核心。
Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试以中等时钟速度（P核：2.5 GHz，E核：2.2 GHz）进行短暂处理，之后时钟速率下降了一些（P核：2 GHz，E核：1.8至1.9 GHz）。单线程测试在3.3至4.4 GHz（P核）和2.1至3.3 GHz（E核）下执行。在电池电量上，时钟速率明显降低。
在CB15循环的第一次运行中，时钟速率下降，基本时钟速度有时会被削弱。换句话说。Turbo几乎不使用或根本不使用。当 "正常 "模式被激活时，时钟速率会持续波动。高 "模式使性能发展更加稳定，水平略高。
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
LG Gram 17 (2022) Intel Core i5-1240P: Ø883 (660.36-1389.32)
LG Gram 17 (2022) Intel Core i5-1240P; Lautlos: Ø182.4 (111.09-407.15)
LG Gram 17 (2022) Intel Core i5-1240P; Hoch: Ø1118 (1074.23-1416.08)
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø770 (754.67-777.73)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø1777 (1730.55-2218.28)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø1672 (1578.91-2216.93)
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H: Ø1601 (1588.94-1610.89)
LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø617 (599.62-737.2)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø954 (921.15-990.11)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Cinebench R23 | |
| Multi Core | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (1056 - 15743, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (277 - 11556, n=20) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| Single Core | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (529 - 1995, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (640 - 1689, n=18) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (356 - 5904, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (763 - 4456, n=16) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Average of class Office (181.3 - 764, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (251 - 653, n=16) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (Performance) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (Balanced) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (407 - 2007, n=19) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Average of class Office (160.8 - 2642, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (82.6 - 284, n=118, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (91.8 - 243, n=18) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Average of class Office (214 - 2844, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (285 - 1926, n=16) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 | |
| 7z b 4 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (4226 - 62349, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (7254 - 47002, n=16) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Average of class Office (2233 - 6687, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (2197 - 5320, n=16) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (1763 - 10112, n=15) | |
| Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| Single-Core | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (672 - 1658, n=15) | |
| Average of class Office (510 - 1974, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (1.55 - 17.4, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (1.99 - 12.9, n=16) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (46.4 - 120.5, n=16) | |
| Average of class Office (31.3 - 117.5, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (0.4987 - 1.236, n=16) | |
| Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.397, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (v6.70.6000) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (v6.33.5700) | |
| Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Hoch) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (2405 - 9694, n=16) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (v6.50.5800) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (v6.33.5700) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Lautlos) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (v6.70.6000) | |
| Average of class Office (4027 - 102228, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Hoch) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (v6.33.5700) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (7407 - 49934, n=16) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (v6.50.5800) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (v6.33.5700) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Lautlos) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (v6.70.6000) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (v6.33.5700) | |
| Average of class Office (279 - 4442, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Hoch) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (415 - 2462, n=16) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (v6.50.5800) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (v6.33.5700) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Lautlos) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (v6.70.6000) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (29405 - 76736, n=16) | |
| Average of class Office (8031 - 113016, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Hoch) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Lautlos) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (v6.33.5700) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (v6.33.5700) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (v6.70.6000) | |
| Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (2135 - 6540, n=16) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Hoch) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (v6.33.5700) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (v6.50.5800) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (v6.33.5700) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Lautlos) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (v6.70.6000) | |
| Average of class Office (2054 - 54365, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (v6.33.5700) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Hoch) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (5113 - 23992, n=16) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (v6.50.5800) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (v6.33.5700) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Lautlos) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (v6.70.6000) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (v6.33.5700) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (v6.33.5700) | |
| Average of class Office (5226 - 147611, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (8849 - 90370, n=16) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Hoch) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (v6.50.5800) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Lautlos) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (v6.70.6000) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (101.6 - 812, n=16) | |
| Average of class Office (67.6 - 1018, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Hoch) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (v6.33.5700) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (v6.50.5800) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (v6.33.5700) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Lautlos) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (v6.70.6000) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (v6.33.5700) | |
| Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Hoch) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (1154 - 5258, n=16) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (v6.50.5800) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (v6.33.5700) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Lautlos) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (v6.33.5700) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (v6.70.6000) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Hoch) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (v6.50.5800) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (11873 - 43661, n=16) | |
| Average of class Office (4814 - 48177, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (v6.33.5700) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (v6.70.6000, Lautlos) | |
系统性能
快速而流畅的系统为办公和互联网应用提供了足够的性能。PCMark的结果从体面到良好不等。内存的传输率对于LPDDR5-5200内存来说是正常的（双通道模式，焊接，没有内存组）。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (2325 - 7157, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4881 - 5345, n=11) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Average of class Office (5095 - 20841, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8890 - 10652, n=11) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (3041 - 10198, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6118 - 7058, n=11) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (1912 - 9056, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5169 - 6213, n=11) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1392 - 1553, n=7) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1393 - 1524, n=7) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1426 - 1647, n=7) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1267 - 1545, n=7) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4222 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4784 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2967 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5069 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (23312 - 70537, n=16) | |
| Average of class Office (7158 - 88119, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (18989 - 70553, n=16) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average of class Office (7325 - 87297, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (23454 - 62496, n=16) | |
| Average of class Office (7579 - 94965, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1240P (85.1 - 188.3, n=11) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Average of class Office (44.3 - 188.3, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
我们的标准化延迟显示器测试（网页浏览、4K视频播放、高负荷的Prime95）显示了问题。虽然这台笔记本电脑提供短延迟，但似乎有一个驱动问题，这将阻碍实时视频和音频编辑。未来的软件更新可能导致改进，也可能导致性能恶化。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
* ... smaller is better
储存
LG为Gram配备了三星的PCIe 4固态硬盘（M.2 2280），其存储容量为512GB。它的传输速率非常好。然而，Diskpd循环的结果表明，由于温度的原因，速度在后期会被扼杀。这台笔记本电脑仍然可以容纳第二个固态硬盘。
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6846 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5121 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
595.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
402.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
4130 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3857 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
88.47 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
212 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
LG Gram 17 (2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ: Ø5477 (3286.79-6737.1)
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ1T0HBLB-00BKN: Ø2267 (2081.42-2278.92)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD: Ø2838 (2296.17-2855.06)
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ: Ø3543 (2809.14-3559.51)
图形卡
内置的Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUGPU只能在短时间内保持其最大的时钟速率（1300MHz）。无论冷却模式和设置如何，长时间的负载会导致时钟速度的波动--这在我们的TheWitcher 3测试中得到了说明。高 "配置文件短暂地导致性能的小幅提高。在最佳情况下，基准测试结果略高于我们迄今为止为该GPU确定的平均值。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Average of class Office | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G -2! | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) -1! | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| Average of class Office (1474 - 13132, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (2246 - 6477, n=105) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Average of class Office (5681 - 58068, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (6361 - 30894, n=92) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Average of class Office (712 - 9228, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (1560 - 5305, n=107) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Lautlos) | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Average of class Office (242 - 3242, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (561 - 1511, n=104) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4897 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18533 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3969 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1528 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
一般来说，这台笔记本电脑可以将许多游戏流畅地呈现在屏幕上。然而，由于GPU时钟速率的大幅波动，帧率波动很大--即使在使用低设置时也是如此。
The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | GTA V | Strange Brigade | F1 2021 | Far Cry 5
| The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Average of class Office (7.82 - 106.3, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (21.8 - 56.9, n=100) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Average of class Office (9.12 - 128.2, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (9.12 - 74.4, n=106) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (1.3) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (1.3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (1.3) | |
| Average of class Office (5.42 - 103.1, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 (1.3) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (1.3, Hoch) | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8.32 - 45.6, n=101) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (1.3) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (1.3) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1280x720 lowest AF:1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Average of class Office (16.3 - 175.7, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Hoch) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (22.7 - 98.7, n=78) | |
| F1 2021 - 1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 (800360) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 (874931) | |
| Average of class Office (18.2 - 197.8, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 (865624) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (874931, Hoch) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (874931) | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (15.6 - 102, n=18) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| Far Cry 5 - 1280x720 Low Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) (Hoch) | |
| Average of class Office (19 - 95, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) | |
| LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G | |
| Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (14 - 63, n=48) | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
| GTA V (2015) | 89.6 | 76.1 | 17.9 | 7.27 | 4.87 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 69.9 | 45.1 | 25.8 | 9.53 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 102.9 | 65.1 | 29.8 | 28.6 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 25.9 | 15.2 | 10.4 | 7.53 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 40 | 25.9 | 25 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 44 | 21 | 15 | 19 | 9 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 71.1 | 25 | 20.6 | 18.9 | 14.7 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 73.1 | 31.4 | 26.4 | 18.3 | 12.3 |
排放--纤细的17英寸笔记本电脑可以安静地运行
噪声排放
在日常使用中（办公室、互联网），风扇通常是无声的；在负载情况下它会变大一些。在压力测试中，最大声压级达到37.2 dB(A)，这是一个完全可以接受的数值。尽管如此。这款笔记本电脑产生的噪音水平明显高于其 前代产品.使用 "静音 "模式可以实现完全无声的操作。所有这些都是以严重牺牲处理能力为代价的。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25.12 / 25.15 / 26 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 36.9 / 37.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.1 dB(A) | ||
| LG Gram 17 (2022) Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ1T0HBLB-00BKN | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD | Honor MagicBook 16 2022 Vega 7, R5 5600H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | -5% | -6% | 7% | -2% | |
| off / environment * | 25.1 | 23 8% | 24.2 4% | 24.1 4% | 25 -0% | 25 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25.12 | 23.2 8% | 24.2 4% | 24.1 4% | 25 -0% | 25 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 25.15 | 23.2 8% | 25.8 -3% | 24.1 4% | 25 1% | 25 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26 | 23.2 11% | 30.5 -17% | 29.2 -12% | 26 -0% | 25 4% |
| Load Average * | 36.9 | 35.8 3% | 39.8 -8% | 40.4 -9% | 27.7 25% | 44.5 -21% |
| Load Maximum * | 37.2 | 41.9 -13% | 39.8 -7% | 47 -26% | 30.5 18% | 36.5 2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.9 | 39.8 | 40.4 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在日常使用中（办公室、互联网），机箱温度保持在绿色区域内。在负载（压力测试）下，笔记本电脑在某些区域明显发热，但总体上只是适度发热。CPU的温度不值得关注。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.4 °C / 88.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-3.7 °C / -6.6 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.4 °C / 88.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-3.7 °C / -6.6 F).
| LG Gram 17 (2022) Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Honor MagicBook 16 2022 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 23% | 10% | 19% | 16% | -1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 37.2 26% | 41.8 16% | 41.6 17% | 43.6 13% | 65.3 -31% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 50 | 47 6% | 47.3 5% | 43.1 14% | 41.4 17% | 55.4 -11% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 31.5 | 22 30% | 28.3 10% | 25.4 19% | 26.4 16% | 25.4 19% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33.5 | 23.6 30% | 30.2 10% | 25.6 24% | 27 19% | 26.8 20% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试开始时，CPU时钟速率已经很低了（Prime95和FurMark至少运行了一个小时），并继续相当快地下降。后者也适用于GPU时钟速率。这种行为可以在能源消耗图中看到（如下图）。压力测试代表了一种极端情况。我们用这个测试来验证系统在全负荷下是否保持稳定。
发言人
立体声扬声器提供了体面的声音，但在低音方面有所欠缺。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG Gram 17 (2022) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - LG笔记本电脑提供非常好的电池寿命
能源消耗
在能源消耗方面没有任何不正常现象。在压力测试期间，功耗增加到65.9瓦，但这个数值下降得相当快--就像我们的TheWitcher 3测试一样。附带的USB-C电源适配器（65瓦）有足够的容量。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.5 / 1.37 Watt |
| Idle | 4 / 12.2 / 13.2 Watt |
| Load |
34 / 65.9 Watt |
   
| |
| LG Gram 17 (2022) i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ1T0HBLB-00BKN, AMOLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Honor MagicBook 16 2022 R5 5600H, Vega 7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | -30% | -6% | 12% | -36% | 12% | 11% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4 | 3.8 5% | 6.1 -53% | 5.1 -28% | 4.9 -23% | 5 -25% | 4.46 ? -12% | 4.3 ? -8% |
| Idle Average * | 12.2 | 5.2 57% | 10.6 13% | 8.7 29% | 10.8 11% | 9 26% | 7.33 ? 40% | 7.35 ? 40% |
| Idle Maximum * | 13.2 | 10.9 17% | 11.5 13% | 9.2 30% | 14 -6% | 9.4 29% | 9.25 ? 30% | 9.15 ? 31% |
| Load Average * | 34 | 40.9 -20% | 65.5 -93% | 50.7 -49% | 26.4 22% | 71 -109% | 36.1 ? -6% | 41.1 ? -21% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.4 | 32.6 17% | 61.2 -55% | 45.9 -16% | 26.3 33% | 72.4 -84% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 65.9 | 63.7 3% | 68.4 -4% | 66.5 -1% | 42 36% | 99 -50% | 61.2 ? 7% | 58.1 ? 12% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test
LG Gram 17 (2022); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø39.4 (27.4-59.3)
LG Gram 17 (2022); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø45.1 (36.1-66.4)
Energy consumption with an external monitor
LG Gram 17 (2022); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø31.1 (20.8-63.3)
LG Gram 17 (2022); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø35.8 (29.3-60)
LG Gram 17 (2022); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø29.2 (21.1-44.6)
LG Gram 17 (2022); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø26.3 (20.7-34.3)
LG Gram 17 (2022); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.5 (3.91-8.99)
电池寿命
在我们的Wi-Fi测试（通过脚本访问网站）和视频测试（短片Big Buck Bunny（H.264编码，全高清）循环运行）中，17英寸笔记本电脑的运行时间分别达到11:09小时和14:04小时。在这两项测试中，笔记本电脑的省电功能被禁用，显示亮度被设置为约150 cd/m²。此外，在视频测试中，无线模块被禁用。
LG笔记本电脑提供了非常好的电池运行时间，但它仍然落后于其 Tiger Lake 前辈它有一个相同的电池。
| LG Gram 17 (2022) i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 80 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 15 NP950XDB-KC5US i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Honor MagicBook 16 2022 R5 5600H, Vega 7, 56 Wh | LG Gram 17Z90P-G.AA56G i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 80 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, 75 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | -37% | -46% | 7% | -32% | -19% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1692 | 2232 32% | 2014 19% | 1163 -31% | 1436 ? -15% | ||
| H.264 | 844 | 484 -43% | 625 -26% | 705 ? -16% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 669 | 603 -10% | 424 -37% | 491 -27% | 763 14% | 543 -19% | 594 ? -11% |
| Load | 179 | 100 -44% | 57 -68% | 155 -13% | 84 -53% | 117.7 ? -34% |
Pros
+ 镁合金外壳
+ 轻巧
+ 哑光16:10显示屏
+ WQXGA分辨率(2,560x1,600像素)
+ 可容纳两个PCIe 4 SSD的空间
+ 优秀的电池寿命
+ 键盘背光灯
+ 雷电4
+ 电源交付
+ 通过USB-C显示端口
Cons
- 壳体应更加坚固
- 价格昂贵
- CPU性能一般
- 内存不能交换/扩展（焊接）。
- 比前代产品有更高的噪音发展
结论 - 一个既向前迈进又向后退步的笔记本电脑
Gram 17的最新化身可以归类为模型更新。LG使用了前辈的紧凑、轻巧的镁合金外壳，以及相同的端口配置（包括2个雷电4）和键盘。在硬件方面可以发现变化。
通过Gram 17 (2022)，LG提供了一个轻型（约1,350克）的移动工作设备--并且最终采用了哑光显示屏。
Alder Lake提供了更多（多线程）的CPU性能，包括 酷睿i5-1240P，而GPU的性能仍然与前代产品持平。短暂的负载高峰会得到大量的处理能力，而长时间的负载会导致时钟速度的降低--这适用于CPU和iGPU。因此，购买带有名义上更强大的Gram型号的Core-i7-1260P处理器的型号不太可能是值得的。由于核心数量和分布与酷睿i5-1240P相同，稍高的时钟频率几乎不会有影响，或者甚至可能根本不被利用。对于稍快的iGPU也可能是如此。
额外的CPU内核以及桤木湖更高的能耗有副作用。2022 Gram在负载下会产生更多噪音，电池寿命也比它的前辈短。 前代产品.尽管如此，11至14小时的实际耐力值（在最大显示亮度下为7小时）仍然可以被描述为优秀。
哑光显示屏是一个非常受欢迎的变化。前代产品只有反射表面的显示屏。16:10格式的17英寸显示屏（2,560x1,600像素）在亮度和对比度方面得分，而且它几乎完全覆盖了DCI-P3色彩空间。辅之以稳定的视角和良好的色彩再现。
2022 Gram的一个替代品是 前代产品，它仍然可用。更少的噪音和更好的电池寿命被更少的CPU功率和反射式显示屏所抵消。另一个选择是三星Galaxy Book Pro 15 - 一个15.6英寸的设备。它的重量比Gram少了300克，但它的处理能力较弱，电池寿命略短。
价格和可用性
在写这篇文章的时候，我们对LG Gram 17 (2022)的审查配置，它配备了Core i5-1240P，16GB内存和512GB SSD，可以在亚马逊上找到售价约为1480美元。
LG Gram 17 (2022)
-
08/13/2022 v7
Sascha Mölck
Office - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
