Notebookcheck Logo

realme 9 5G评测--快速而实惠的5G智能手机

克隆了专业版。 realme 9 5G是一款非常有趣的智能手机,因为它非常接近于更昂贵的Pro-model。那么它是否提供了更好的性价比?与前代产品相比有什么变化?我们将在评论中予以澄清。
5G Android ARM Smartphone
realme 9 4G
realme 9 4G
realme 9 5G (9 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A77) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2412 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 256 GB, shared, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, magnetometer, gyroscope
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​2/3/4/​5/​7/​8/12/13/17/18/19/​20/26/​28/​38/​39/40/41/66), 5G (n1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 164.3 x 75.6
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.8, Samsung Isocell JN1, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/30fps (Camera 1), 2 MP, macro (Camera 2), 2 MP, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.05
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, silicone bumper, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.987 W/kg (head), 1.251 W/kg (body), fanless
Weight
191 g
Price
260 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.2 %
05/2022
realme 9 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
191 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2412x1080
80.5 %
04/2022
realme 9 Pro
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2412x1080
80.2 %
05/2021
realme 8 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
185 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80.4 %
04/2022
Motorola Moto G41
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
178 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2400x1080
78.4 %
02/2022
Samsung Galaxy M32
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
180 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2400x1080

外壳和设备 - 比前代产品更昂贵

Realme的中端系列正在增长,现在共提供5个型号,型号为realme 9和realme 9 5G,涵盖了200至400欧元的价格范围。

realme 9 5G,我们想在这篇评论中仔细看看,正好处于中间位置,在4GB工作内存和64GB(约280美元)或128GB大容量存储(约280美元)的两种配置变体中都保持在300欧元以下(约260美元)。然而,这也使得这款智能手机比前代产品要贵得多。 realme 8 5G,后者仍以不到200欧元的价格出售。

对于塑料背面,realme受到沙丘的启发,设计了一种特殊的涂层,可以折射光线,类似于沙漠中的线条。这在我们的白色测试设备上看起来非常别致。背面也有珍珠效果,可以折射出多种颜色的光线。指纹在这个明亮的变体上不是一个大问题。黑色可以作为第二种颜色选择。

外壳的稳定性是正常的,但正面的压力很快就会传到液晶显示器上,智能手机也可以被扭曲,然后悄悄地吱吱作响。

NFC和蓝牙5.1都已安装。SD读卡器必须与第二张SIM卡共享一个插槽,所以你必须决定你想使用什么。该读卡器在基准测试中与我们的参考微型SD卡Angelbird V60取得了相当好的成绩。

realme 9 5G
realme 9 5G
realme 9 5G
realme 9 5G
realme 9 5G
realme 9 5G

尺寸比较

164.3 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 191 g164.3 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 195 g162.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.5 mm 185 g161.9 mm 73.9 mm 8.3 mm 178 g159.3 mm 74 mm 8.4 mm 180 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy M32
  (Angelbird V60)
40.7 MB/s ∼100% +55%
realme 9 Pro
  (Angelbird V60)
29.6 MB/s ∼73% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.9 - 59.2, n=84, last 2 years)
26.4 MB/s ∼65% 0%
realme 9 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
26.3 MB/s ∼65%
Motorola Moto G41
  (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s ∼60% -8%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø37.1 (26.6-49.6)
realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø37 (24.8-48)
realme 8 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø31.7 (15.9-47.1)
Motorola Moto G41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø29.1 (18.9-42.3)
Samsung Galaxy M32 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø34.7 (25-43.4)
realme 9 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø74.6 (34.7-88)
realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø37.9 (17.6-80.6)
realme 8 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø73.4 (16.5-76.7)
Motorola Moto G41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø67.9 (19.3-81.6)
Samsung Galaxy M32 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø60.7 (30.5-64.9)

通信、软件和操作--5G作为价格段的一个特殊功能

这款手机 realme 8 5G已经提供了WiFi 5,在后续版本中没有任何改变。在我们与参考路由器华硕GT-AXE11000的测试中,速度也很相似,在这个价格范围的通常水平上。根据我们的测试,传输是相当稳定的。

然而,与上一代相比,变化的是有了更多的4G频率,所以你在旅行时更加灵活。5G又上场了,顾名思义。在我们的测试期间,我们每隔一段时间就会与同一地点的高端智能手机相比,检查接收质量。realme 9 5G在这里表现不俗,有时可以提供与高端手机类似的强大信号质量。

Android 12和上层的realme UI 3.0已经预装,安全补丁在测试时是2022年3月的,因此应该再次更新。

当你把手指放在手机上时,外壳右侧待机按钮中的指纹传感器几乎立即解锁。在识别手指时偶尔会出现一些问题,但总体而言,该传感器工作可靠。脸部识别也是可能的,但只是作为一个通过前置摄像头的软件解决方案,因此不像基于硬件的识别那样安全。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
realme 8 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
347 (332min - 353max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy M32
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
347 (327min - 352max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
realme 8 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
362 (335min - 367max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy M32
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
335 (259min - 351max) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Motorola Moto G41
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
367 (350min - 381max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
realme 9 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
362 (329min - 376max) MBit/s ∼99%
realme 9 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
358 (339min - 370max) MBit/s ∼98% -1%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
realme 9 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
341 (330min - 352max) MBit/s ∼100%
realme 9 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
333 (320min - 345max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Motorola Moto G41
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
332 (302min - 340max) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (330-352)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø362 (329-376)

照相机 - 没有广角镜头

这显示了与Realme 9 Pro的明显区别。 realme 9 Pro- realme 9 5G的主摄像头旁边没有一个超广角镜头。相反,有一个微距镜头和一个支持人像拍摄的ToF相机,本身并不拍照。

三星Isocell JN1被用来作为主摄像头的传感器。它提供了5000万像素的分辨率,但通常只使用四分之一,即1250万像素,用于拍摄出光率较高的照片。照片的曝光度不错,但缺乏细节,在清晰度方面也有改进的余地。

视频最高可以录制为1080p和30 fps;720p时也可以录制为60 fps。令人高兴的是,自动对焦工作相当精确,没有明显的脉冲。同样,曝光也能迅速调整。

前置摄像头的分辨率为1600万像素,在光线良好的情况下可以拍摄可用的自拍。然而,你不应该把它放大太多,否则细节会很快丢失。

相机设备总体上类似于 realme 8 5G而且是典型的价格范围。然而,用很少的钱也可以买到一个额外的广角镜头,以获得更大的灵活性,例如在 三星Galaxy M32.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
26.3 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
21 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
14 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
ColorChecker realme 9 5G: 16.81 ∆E min: 3.2 - max: 26.3 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
28 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
63 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
74.9 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
87.1 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker realme 9 5G: 45.85 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 87.11 ∆E

显示屏 - realme手机的全高清IPS屏幕

realme 9 5G的全高清显示屏是基于IPS技术的。在这个价格范围内,也有采用AMOLED屏幕的手机,如 Galaxy M32摩托G41但这两种情况下都不支持5G。

很好的是,realme提供了一个支持120赫兹的面板,使动作看起来更流畅,操作感觉更灵敏。

在亮度方面,该屏幕表现良好,但不能完全跟上AMOLED屏幕。在使用软件CalMAN进行的更详细的测量中,我们确定的读数与realme 9 Pro中的读数相当相似。 realme 9 Pro因此,我们可以假设它是相同的面板。

581
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
589
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 589 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 560.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.13 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 589 cd/m²
Contrast: 1178:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.33 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
97.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.063
realme 9 5G
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
realme 9 Pro
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
realme 8 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Motorola Moto G41
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Samsung Galaxy M32
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Response Times
6%
10%
74%
68%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
48 ?(23, 25)
42
12%
33 ?(17, 16)
31%
9 ?(3, 6)
81%
10 ?(7, 3)
79%
Response Time Black / White *
18 ?(7, 11)
18
-0%
20 ?(9, 11)
-11%
6 ?(3, 3)
67%
8 ?(5, 3)
56%
PWM Frequency
240.4
362.3 ?(99)
Screen
0%
-5%
39%
36%
Brightness middle
589
541
-8%
576
-2%
713
21%
712
21%
Brightness
561
541
-4%
550
-2%
712
27%
720
28%
Brightness Distribution
90
96
7%
91
1%
91
1%
95
6%
Black Level *
0.5
0.44
12%
0.7
-40%
Contrast
1178
1230
4%
823
-30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.33
4.42
-2%
3.58
17%
1.1
75%
1.94
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.39
8.77
-5%
6.95
17%
2.39
72%
5.81
31%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.9
6
-2%
5.7
3%
3.7
37%
1.5
75%
Gamma
2.063 107%
2.074 106%
2.141 103%
2.264 97%
2.089 105%
CCT
8021 81%
8049 81%
7922 82%
7373 88%
6593 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 1%
3% / -2%
57% / 48%
52% / 44%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21819 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命--在一个廉价的手机中具有很大的能量

在性能方面,realme 9 5G和realme 9 Pro都不相上下。这也难怪,因为两者都使用相同的SoC,即 骁龙695来自高通公司。因此,它们提供了比其他价格范围内的智能手机多得多的动力,并实现了平稳运行。从高端智能手机换到realme 9 5G的用户可能会注意到这里和那里有轻微的延迟,但整体性能很容易满足日常使用和一般要求的游戏。

然而,在内存方面,realme 9 5G比前代产品要慢一些,这似乎是由于SoC的原因,因为 realme 9 Pro必须忍受同样的限制。

发热处于正常水平,最多只有在非常高的环境温度下才会变得令人不愉快。

外壳下缘的单声道扬声器非常强调高音,因此在高音量时对我们的耳朵有点不舒服。使用外部扬声器或耳机可以获得更好的声音,它们可以通过蓝牙和目前所有重要的编解码器连接。如果你仍然有经典的有线耳机,也可以使用3.5毫米的端口。

与前代产品一样,我们的测试设备有一个18瓦的充电技术,因此,当电池完全耗尽时,充电时间约为1:45小时。在我们的WLAN测试中,5000毫安时的电池使运行时间超过17小时,这应该很容易持续一个正常工作日。而且,如果你忘记给电池充电,你甚至可以在低负荷的情况下用智能手机电池再管理一天。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
692 Points ∼99%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
697 Points ∼100% +1%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
574 Points ∼82% -17%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
352 Points ∼51% -49%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
367 Points ∼53% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 - 697, n=4)
680 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=254, last 2 years)
669 Points ∼96% -3%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1914 Points ∼87%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2016 Points ∼92% +5%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1775 Points ∼81% -7%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1282 Points ∼59% -33%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1342 Points ∼61% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 - 2016, n=4)
1819 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=254, last 2 years)
2190 Points ∼100% +14%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9776 Points ∼94%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9585 Points ∼92% -2%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10433 Points ∼100% +7%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6749 Points ∼65% -31%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6508 Points ∼62% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (9585 - 9776, n=2)
9681 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=144, last 2 years)
10155 Points ∼97% +4%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2949 Points ∼100%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2930 Points ∼99% -1%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2343 Points ∼79% -21%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1411 Points ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1319 Points ∼45% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2930 - 2949, n=2)
2940 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=178, last 2 years)
2510 Points ∼85% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2831 Points ∼100%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2817 Points ∼100% 0%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2206 Points ∼78% -22%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1238 Points ∼44% -56%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1165 Points ∼41% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2817 - 2831, n=2)
2824 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=178, last 2 years)
2609 Points ∼92% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3455 Points ∼100%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3410 Points ∼99% -1%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2991 Points ∼87% -13%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2558 Points ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2462 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3410 - 3455, n=2)
3433 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=178, last 2 years)
2846 Points ∼82% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3098 Points ∼77%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3085 Points ∼77% 0%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2453 Points ∼61% -21%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1434 Points ∼36% -54%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1367 Points ∼34% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3085 - 3098, n=2)
3092 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=231, last 2 years)
4014 Points ∼100% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3008 Points ∼60%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2980 Points ∼59% -1%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2295 Points ∼46% -24%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1269 Points ∼25% -58%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1204 Points ∼24% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (2980 - 3008, n=2)
2994 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=231, last 2 years)
5009 Points ∼100% +67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3462 Points ∼98%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3520 Points ∼100% +2%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3234 Points ∼92% -7%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2662 Points ∼76% -23%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2605 Points ∼74% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3462 - 3520, n=2)
3491 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=231, last 2 years)
3234 Points ∼92% -7%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1197 Points ∼37%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1209 Points ∼38% +1%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1103 Points ∼34% -8%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
736 Points ∼23% -39%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
685 Points ∼21% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1197 - 1209, n=2)
1203 Points ∼37% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=181, last 2 years)
3210 Points ∼100% +168%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1197 Points ∼35%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1199 Points ∼35% 0%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1078 Points ∼32% -10%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
732 Points ∼21% -39%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
683 Points ∼20% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1197 - 1199, n=2)
1198 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=182, last 2 years)
3405 Points ∼100% +184%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
356 Points ∼36%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
360 Points ∼36% +1%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
182 Points ∼18% -49%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
173 Points ∼17% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (356 - 360, n=2)
358 Points ∼36% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=137, last 2 years)
1001 Points ∼100% +181%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
352 Points ∼36%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
353 Points ∼36% 0%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
178 Points ∼18% -49%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
172 Points ∼17% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (352 - 353, n=2)
353 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=133, last 2 years)
983 Points ∼100% +179%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19 fps ∼66%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps ∼66% 0%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
14 fps ∼49% -26%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.5 fps ∼30% -55%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.1 fps ∼28% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (18 - 19, n=3)
18.7 fps ∼65% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=249, last 2 years)
28.7 fps ∼100% +51%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
21 fps ∼62%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
21 fps ∼62% 0%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps ∼44% -29%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
9.6 fps ∼28% -54%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
9.2 fps ∼27% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (21 - 21, n=3)
21 fps ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 123, n=250, last 2 years)
34 fps ∼100% +62%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
12 fps ∼61%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
12 fps ∼61% 0%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.7 fps ∼44% -27%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
5.4 fps ∼27% -55%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
5.1 fps ∼26% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (11 - 12, n=3)
11.7 fps ∼59% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=250, last 2 years)
19.8 fps ∼100% +65%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.8 fps ∼60%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.9 fps ∼61% +1%
realme 8 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.6 fps ∼43% -28%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3.4 fps ∼26% -56%
Samsung Galaxy M32
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3.3 fps ∼25% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (7.8 - 8, n=3)
7.9 fps ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 47, n=250, last 2 years)
13 fps ∼100% +67%
realme 9 5Grealme 9 Prorealme 8 5GMotorola Moto G41Samsung Galaxy M32Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
20%
89%
-8%
-3%
79%
131%
Sequential Read 256KB
511
494
-3%
969
90%
298.5
-42%
297.3
-42%
771 ?(511 - 907, n=3)
51%
926 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=247, last 2 years)
81%
Sequential Write 256KB
120.6
105.3
-13%
201
67%
172.3
43%
178.7
48%
304 ?(120.6 - 519, n=3)
152%
469 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=247, last 2 years)
289%
Random Read 4KB
88.5
148.3
68%
192
117%
86.9
-2%
98
11%
133.1 ?(88.5 - 173, n=3)
50%
165.6 ?(13.5 - 345, n=247, last 2 years)
87%
Random Write 4KB
95.4
120.4
26%
175
83%
64.4
-32%
68.8
-28%
155 ?(95.4 - 206, n=3)
62%
158.9 ?(56.5 - 458, n=248, last 2 years)
67%

温度

Max. Load
 43.1 °C40.1 °C37.1 °C 
 42.9 °C40.1 °C37.8 °C 
 42 °C39.9 °C37.6 °C 
Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 40.1 °C
35.3 °C38.2 °C43.2 °C
36.7 °C38.6 °C43.8 °C
36.2 °C39.8 °C42.4 °C
Maximum: 43.8 °C
Average: 39.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  36.9 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs205337.52544.542.53133.7354033.435.55035.839.26330.131.68021.3251002124.512516.321.816014.731.420012.94125014.348.53151351.340010.856.450012.363.963013.56680019.57010001576.4125014.176.2160014.973.4200011.970.6250012.866.5315015.463400016.569.4500016.776.2630017.27480001866.81000017.9651250017.667.91600018.350.9SPL2884.1N0.956.2median 15median 66Delta2.11041.54135.535.431.728.630.833.632.237.525.12819.421.720.920.817.621.415.834.41341.111.744.910.654.410.559.911.966.313.869.515.47412.774.8167812.472.911.668.413.169.113.17013.77114.271.814.769.115.369.615.967.416.566.817.155.826.1840.757.8median 13.8median 68.41.810hearing rangehide median Pink Noiserealme 9 5Grealme 9 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
realme 9 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

realme 9 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

realme 9 5G
5000 mAh
realme 9 Pro
5000 mAh
realme 8 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G41
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M32
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
1029
1047
2%
1104
7%
905
-12%
1098
7%
906 ?(438 - 1953, n=255, last 2 years)
-12%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 9min

Pros

+ 高效能
+ 无PWM的明亮IPS屏幕
+ 电池寿命长
+ 5G功能
+ 许多4G频率

Cons

- 指纹传感器部分不准确
- 相机照片时常模糊不清
- 高音重的扬声器

结论 - 花很少的钱买很多的性能和5G

回顾:realme 9 5G。测试设备由德国realme公司提供。
回顾:realme 9 5G。测试设备由德国realme公司提供。

realme的型号命名方案在这里有点奇怪:realme 9 5G的价格明显比 realme 9 Pro,然而,除了外观、更快的充电速度和相机系统的一些细节,它是一款非常、非常相似的智能手机。因此,你显然在这里得到了更好的性价比。

特别是SoC,使realme 9 5G成为300欧元以下的有趣的智能手机:你很难在这个价格范围内的任何其他手机中获得这么多的性能,而且大多数竞争对手甚至没有提供5G。当然,这在未来几个月可能会改变,但在测试时,realme 9 5G的功能对于其价格点来说非常好。

然而,一些消极的方面仍然存在:例如,指纹传感器部分不准确,相机拍摄的照片有些模糊。扬声器的声音也不是很好。

作为一款拥有快速移动互联网和快速SoC的廉价智能手机,realme 9 5G是一款性价比很高的推荐。

realme 9 5G的价格明显高于前辈的价格 realme 8 5G但它提供了更多的性能和可能更长的更新。如果你购买realme 8 5G它甚至可能是一个更大的便宜,因为特性没有改变那么多。其他制造商的5G手机低于300欧元的情况很少见,所以你应该寻找替代品,如果你想要 一加北方CE 2小米11 Lite 5G的好价格。

价格和可用性

realme 9 5G可直接从制造商,起价260欧元。.

realme 9 5G - 05/12/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
47 / 70 → 67%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
85%
Games Performance
37 / 64 → 58%
Application Performance
71 / 86 → 83%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Camera
55%
Average
74%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > realme 9 5G评测--快速而实惠的5G智能手机
Florian Schmitt, 2022-05-14 (Update: 2022-05-14)