Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 13 MPix 13 MP selfie camera (f/2.25), video recording up to 1080p@30fps
Price comparison
Average of 33 scores (from 54 reviews)
Reviews for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T costs 230 Euros (~$279) in the smallest version and is already sold for less than 200 Euros (~$243) in some places. The special feature: The Redmi Note 9T is one of the cheapest, if not the cheapest 5G smartphone. Despite the low price, the remaining features also appear to be good. This is reason enough to take a closer look at Xiaomi's 5G smartphone.
Source: It Pro
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Redmi Note 9T is a lot better than its bargain price suggests. With a turn of pace that matches handsets that cost twice the price, it’s a great way to access the growing 5G network without spending excess cash. It’s not flawless: the screen is nothing special and we’re miffed about the removal of the ultrawide camera, but you won’t find anything better at this price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Manila Shaker
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionOverall, it’s hard to recommend this phone cause within its price range, you can opt for Poco X3 NFC. It has raw and log shooting as well as other increments–like the Ultrawide lens, 120Hz refresh rate, and 6GB of ram. But if you’re eyeing an affordable 5G phone, I surely will recommend the Redmi Note 9T. This is the very first cheap 5G from Xiaomi, and besides, it has faster charging and the 7nm chipset really gives power efficiency. You will have 5G and productivity, and some gaming in this device for just less than P12,000.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/23/2021
Source: Manila Shaker
Archive.org versionThe Redmi Note 9T is Xiaomi's very first cheap 5G smartphone. it is equipped with a mid-range chipset MediaTek dimensity 800U (7nm). We tested the Camera Quality and Gaming Performance of this device, can it compete?
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2021
Source: Techradar
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is a decent phone for the price. It’s fairly snappy in use, it has a nice design that fits snugly in the hand, and you’re getting 5G compatibility on a budget. It’s not perfect – the display isn’t as bright as it could be, and camera performance is uninspiring – but such limitations come with the price tag. It’s hard to recommend, though, with the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite offering better specs for the same price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Yugatech
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G has the makings of a good mid-range smartphone — a large hi-res screen, new and capable chipset, 5G connectivity, good cameras, and a large battery. We don’t have the local SRP, though, but we expect it to be priced competitively like the older Redmi 9 series models. If you’re looking for a solid daily driver with casual gaming power, this phone should be on your list.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/04/2021
Source: GSM Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionXiaomi seemingly had a specific goal in mind with the Redmi Note 9T - modern 5G connectivity on a budget. In fact, that goal is obviously shared by its close Chinese sibling in the Redmi Note 9 5G, as well. With the small caveat that hitting international markets meant making a few compromises on the Redmi Note 9T specs to stay within budget. Namely, dropping the ultrawide camera and reducing the fast charging speed. That's on top of sacrifices that are inherent to cramming 5G support into a budget phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionGreat value for money is the key sell here. While the strong feature set sounds like enough to see off its rivals, the 9T suffers from push and pull with its software that causes irks, meaning it's an affordable phone that'll suit some - but not all.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionXiaomi delivers once again with the Redmi Note 9T. Not only does it offer 5G on a budget, but it also gives fast performance, an impressive battery life and a clear and crisp display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: T3
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Redmi Note 9T from Xiaomi gives you plenty of smartphone for your money, with 5G connectivity, a large screen and impressive battery life all wrapped up in a package that won't cost you much at all. It's an appealing proposition for bargain smartphone hunters.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Central
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Redmi Note 9T lowers the barrier to entry for 5G connectivity. The phone ticks all the right boxes in terms of hardware, featuring a large 6.53-inch screen, outstanding performance, and a 48MP module at the back that takes great photos. If you don't mind the fact that it's still based on Android 10, the Redmi Note 9T is a great overall package.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: TechTablets
Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/18/2021
Source: Techradar
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is a decent cheap phone, with improvements over its predecessor and some useful new features. It's not perfect - there's a recurring Xiaomi software problem and so-so cameras, but there's lots to like here.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/08/2021
Source: Android Authority
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is a solid phone that takes the fight to Realme and OnePlus in the budget market. If you're looking for 5G and the best battery life for the price, look no further than the Note 9T. However, if a dazzling display and punchy photos are what you're after, there are better options for a little bit more cash.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Yugatech
Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/08/2021
Source: Futurezone.at
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2021
Source: Techtest.org
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/11/2021
Source: Nextpit Germany
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tech Stage
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Inside Handy
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerbild
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/27/2021
Source: Netzwelt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 77% features: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 95% workmanship: 85%
Source: ChinaMobileMag
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/20/2021
Source: Xataka
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 75% display: 75% mobility: 93% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tuexperto
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/08/2021
Source: Computerhoy
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: El Androide Libre
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/08/2021
Source: Canaltech
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/22/2021
Source: Target HD
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2021
Source: Chimera Revo
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/05/2021
Source: Tutto Android
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 74% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 82% features: 72%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 65% display: 70% mobility: 94% workmanship: 64%
Source: Want.nl
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/19/2021
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2021
Source: Nextpit France
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: 01Net
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/18/2021
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 60% mobility: 90%
Source: Les Mobiles
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Fredzone
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 77% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 90% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 90% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: CNet France
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Journal du Geek
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Antyweb
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/12/2021
Source: Komputerswiat
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/08/2021
Source: Mega Obzor
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2021
Source: Smartmania.cz
CZ→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 85% features: 79% mobility: 89% workmanship: 81%
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/10/2021
Source: Arena IT
→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/16/2021
Source: Puhelinvertailu
→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Comment
ARM Mali-G57 MP3:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Dimensity 800U:
Dimensity 800U是具有集成5G调制解调器的快速中端SoC。它包括两个高达2.4 GHz的快速ARM Cortex-A76内核和六个高达2 GHz的高能效Cortex-A55内核。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.