华硕ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW笔记本电脑评论。1440p 240 Hz的游戏动力,配备桤木湖酷睿i9和150 W RTX 3070 Ti

华硕ROG Strix系列是每年年初备受期待的游戏笔记本阵容之一,值得关注。这款 ROG Strix Scar 15 (2022)在2022年CES期间宣布,升级为英特尔Alder Lake-H和图形选项,直到 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti 笔记本电脑GPU.华硕继续将G533的命名发扬光大到2022年,但在品牌上做了一些改变。
虽然华硕完全转向AMD Ryzen 5000系列的产品,但与 ROG Strix Scar 152021年,该公司现在已经将产品线分为不同的英特尔Alder Lake和AMD Ryzen 6000产品。
在15.6英寸格式中,我们有一些产品,如我们目前的测试装置,ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW。在AMD方面,华硕放弃了 "Scar "品牌(以及签名设计和Keystone),Strix G15 G513系列由CPU选项提供,最高可达 Ryzen 9 6900HX和高达150 WRTX 3080笔记本电脑GPU.
ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW (2022)为该阵容引入了一些诱人的新功能。所有2022年的ROG笔记本电脑现在都配备了MUX开关,可以在Armory Crate内启用。我们还可以看到高达WQHD 240 Hz面板的显示选项,DDR5-4800内存,PCIe Gen 4固态硬盘,更快的USB端口,2.5G网络和Wi-Fi 6E。
我们测试的ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW设备是由酷睿i9-12900H和一个150 WRTX 3070 Ti笔记本GPU.板上有32GB DDR5-4800内存,以及2TB Gen 4 NVMe SSD。这个配置会让你付出2,64,990英镑(3,419美元)的代价。
在这次审查中,我们采取了ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW的旋转,看看新的升级是否值得你考虑。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.3 % | 06/2022 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 27.2 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
80.7 % | 04/2022 | MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.7 % | 03/2022 | Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 22.4 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 | |
86.9 % | 03/2022 | MSI Vector GP66 12UGS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % | 06/2022 | MSI Raider GE66 12UHS i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
85.5 % | 05/2022 | HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 | |
88 % | 03/2022 | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 26.6 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.4 % | 05/2022 | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
86.5 % | 03/2022 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800S | 1.7 kg | 19.5 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.1 % | 03/2022 | Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 16.99 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案件。与去年相比没有变化
ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW在设计、尺寸和重量方面与去年的机型几乎没有区别。主体主要由塑料制成--它并不感觉廉价或俗气,但它可以迅速聚集相当多的指纹和污点。
如果用力按压的话,键盘板会有一些明显的弯曲,但没有什么特别的问题。键盘甲板的右边缘是半透明的,具有标志性的Scar风格,可以偷看内部结构。
盖子是由铝制成的,可以用一个手指打开,但它的弯曲度有点大,不符合我们的喜好。盖子的背面有ROG的标志,其轮廓得到一些RGB的喜爱。显示屏的底部也有LED灯,可以增加一些亮点。盖子只能打开到大约130°,当在腿上使用该设备时,这可能会有点麻烦。
底部是橡胶的,可以牢牢抓住。还有一些可定制的ROG盔甲帽--盒子里有几个,但如果你喜欢,你可以3D打印定制的。
总的来说,华硕ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW的建造质量在大多数情况下是坚固的,除了键盘和盖子的一些弯曲。
连接性。板载Thunderbolt 4和Wi-Fi 6E
在I/O方面,ROG Strix Scar 15 G533涵盖了基本的内容。在左边,有两个USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A和一个组合音频插孔,而右边只有一个插槽,用于放置 ROG Keystone 2.Keystone 2是一个NFC钥匙,与Armory Crate应用程序一起使用,可以应用各种性能和RGB配置文件,还可以解锁一个隐藏的影子驱动器。
大部分的端口都位于后部。这些端口包括一个雷电4端口,一个支持DisplayPort输出和Power Delivery的USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C,HDMI 2.1输出,一个2.5G以太网端口,以及直流电源输入。
端口的位置很方便,不会妨碍外部鼠标的移动。不幸的是,Scar 15没有提供SD卡插槽或Kensington锁插槽。
沟通
ROG Strix Scar 15通过英特尔Wi-Fi 6E AX211卡提供Wi-Fi 6E连接。我们已经看到,之前有几款笔记本电脑采用了AX211芯片组。但ROG Strix Scar 15可能是在印度推出的第一个支持新无线标准的笔记本电脑。
如果需要,Scar 15的Wi-Fi卡可以被换掉,但我们对它的位置并不十分喜欢。WLAN卡实际上被藏在主要的M.2固态硬盘下面,需要拆下硬盘,以便升级或更换。你还应该小心来自Keystone PCB的数据线,它直接在卡的上方运行。
因此,我们用参考的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000路由器测试了Wi-Fi 5 GHz和Wi-Fi 6E的性能,在距离设备1米的清晰视线范围内。我们的测试设备在接收测试中显示6E的平均接收速度高达6%,在传输测试中显示与5GHz类似的平均吞吐量。 6E频段还允许更高的最大接收值,接近2 Gbit/s。
我们确实观察到,在刚启动到Windows时,需要一些时间才能使6GHz选项可用来连接。在测试中没有观察到吞吐量的重大下降。
Networking | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Average of class Gaming (1486 - 1857, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (1409 - 1857, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (1283 - 1851, n=11) | |
Average of class Gaming (1404 - 1567, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average of class Gaming (787 - 1748, n=19, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (1289 - 1748, n=7) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average of class Gaming (851 - 1695, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (833 - 1861, n=7) |
网络摄像头
ROG Strix Scar 15没有配备网络摄像头。然而,我们的评测单位配备了一个外部的ROG Eye 1080p 60 fps网络摄像头,内置波束成形双麦克风。该网络摄像头可以在桌面上使用,也可以安装在Scar 15的顶部边框上。
在大多数情况下,ROG Eye的图像质量是相当可用的。在光线充足的房间里,通过我们的ColorChecker Passport,ROG Eye摄像头显示的平均Delta E色彩精度为15.12,在白色和黑色斑块中看到最低的Delta E值。
测试图显示了体面的细节,但图像中缺乏锐利度和清晰度。如果单独购买,ROG Eye网络摄像头将使你花费约5,800英镑(约75美元或更低)。

安全问题
由于ROG Strix Scar 15针对的是游戏人群,华硕在安全功能上有所节制,如指纹识别器或红外摄像头。不过,有一个TPM 2.0模块存在。
辅料
盒子里有电源适配器和通常的文书工作。你还会得到ROG Keystone 2钥匙和两个可替换的ROG装甲帽。我们的设备在发货时配备了ROG Eye外部网络摄像头,但一些零售单位可能不提供,这取决于SKU和地区。
维护
卸下10颗PH0螺丝后,底板可以很容易地被撬开。然而,这里需要小心,因为有脆弱的带状电缆从底板到主板。这些电缆控制底板前缘的RGB灯条。
在我们看来,将机箱的RGB灯条放在这个位置并不是一个好主意,因为如果你在拆卸底板时不小心,细细的电缆就会折断,从而使接触内部部件变得复杂。LED应该是主机箱本身的一部分,最好像MSI GE76 Raider ,例如。
内部结构没有任何特别的惊喜。你得到了可交换的SO-DIMMs,M.2 SSDs,和WLAN卡,一个大的90瓦时电池,和一个双风扇八热管冷却系统。
担保
华硕在印度为ROG Strix Scar 15提供了一年的标准保修。额外的Premium Care可以通过MyAsus应用程序或从华硕商店购买额外的保修延期。
印度买家目前可以利用"返校 "优惠延长两年和三年的保修期,并在购买后15天内为包括ROG系列在内的各种华硕笔记本组合提供意外损坏保护。
输入设备。返回到薄膜开关
键盘
哑光键盘甲板是一个污垢和油脂的磁铁,尽管华硕声称是相反的。的2021年ROG Strix Scar 15的键盘采用了光电机械开关,但华硕在今年的Scar 15中又恢复了经典的薄膜圆顶开关。为了补偿,华硕采用了它所谓的ROG Overstroke,它可以在笔画的较早部分登记按键。键盘有足够的间距,一般来说,打字是相当舒适的,有很好的触感。
最上面一行是音量、麦克风静音、风扇速度和Armory Crate应用程序的快速快捷键。这些键也可以通过Armory Crate映射到自定义快捷键和宏。箭头键比我们希望的要小,但可以完成工作。华硕表示,在WASD键周围有小的通风口,将空气吸入机箱,防止键盘升温。
RGB亮度足以通过Aura Sync享受各种照明效果。所有的键都可以单独点亮,但华硕出于某种原因喜欢把F1-F12的字样放在黑暗中。
触摸板
显示。杜比视界,对比度差,但响应时间有所改善
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 346 cd/m²
Contrast: 586:1 (Black: 0.59 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.06 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 2.5784.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ2, IPS-level, 2560x1440, 15.60 | MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK AU Optronics B156HAN08.4 (AUOAF90), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI Vector GP66 12UGS BOE NE156FHM-NZ3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI Raider GE66 12UHS AUO51EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10 | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Razer Blade 15 2022 Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -51% | -14% | -2% | -14% | -16% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 96.2 | 39 -59% | 70.1 -27% | 80.4 -16% | 71 -26% | 68.7 -29% | 99.1 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 58.4 -42% | 99.5 0% | 98.4 -2% | 97.9 -2% | 97.6 -2% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.5 | 40.3 -52% | 72.1 -15% | 94.7 12% | 73.3 -13% | 70.9 -16% | 86.8 3% |
Response Times | -334% | -1% | -105% | -55% | -63% | -69% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.86 ? 4.21 ? | 38.8 ? -394% | 5.8 ? 26% | 18.8 ? -139% | 14.5 ? -84% | 17.6 ? -124% | 14.4 ? -83% |
Response Time Black / White * | 7.5 ? | 28 ? -273% | 9.6 ? -28% | 12.8 ? -71% | 9.4 ? -25% | 7.6 ? -1% | 11.6 ? -55% |
PWM Frequency | |||||||
Screen | 28% | 24% | 21% | 12% | 43% | 17% | |
Brightness middle | 346 | 248 -28% | 353.1 2% | 351 1% | 335 -3% | 502 45% | 286 -17% |
Brightness | 329 | 245 -26% | 325 -1% | 347 5% | 319 -3% | 491 49% | 271 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 86 -5% | 85 -7% | 90 -1% | 90 -1% | 91 0% | 89 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.59 | 0.13 78% | 0.38 36% | 0.35 41% | 0.28 53% | 0.37 37% | 0.25 58% |
Contrast | 586 | 1908 226% | 929 59% | 1003 71% | 1196 104% | 1357 132% | 1144 95% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.06 | 3.14 -3% | 2.24 27% | 2.54 17% | 4.38 -43% | 2.7 12% | 2.74 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.81 | 5.82 -0% | 5 14% | 8.36 -44% | 9.48 -63% | 4.5 23% | 5.21 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.57 | 3.14 -22% | 1.02 60% | 0.67 74% | 1.33 48% | 1.4 46% | 2.52 2% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.49 88% | 2.24 98% | 2.089 105% | 2.103 105% | 2.44 90% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 7021 93% | 6468 100% | 6864 95% | 7036 92% | 6244 104% | 6326 103% | 6408 101% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 4 | 4.1 | 7 | 2.7 | 1.1 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -119% /
-46% | 3% /
11% | -29% /
-4% | -19% /
-4% | -12% /
13% | -17% /
0% |
* ... smaller is better
京东方CQ NE156QHM-NZ2面板似乎比去年的变种提供了更多的响应时间,这应该会让游戏玩家满意。我们测量了7.5毫秒的100%黑色到100%白色的综合响应时间和4.21毫秒的50%灰色到80%灰色的综合响应时间。
华硕默认启用超速模式,这体现在50%灰度到80%灰度数据中看到的 "喇叭 "信号。面板超速可以在Armory Crate应用程序中禁用。这将灰色到灰色的响应时间增加到7.86毫秒。
我们没有观察到任何PWM或屏幕在所有亮度水平上的闪烁,所以长期使用该显示器应该不会造成任何眼睛疲劳。
欲了解更多信息,请参考我们的文章"为什么脉冲宽度调制(PWM)是如此令人头疼",还可以查看我们的 PWM排名表以了解所有评测设备的PWM频率比较。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.89 ms rise | |
↘ 3.61 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4.21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.98 ms rise | |
↘ 2.23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7.86 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.02 ms rise | |
↘ 3.84 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21878 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能。酷睿i9-12900H以135瓦的功率获得翅膀
华硕为我们测试的ROG Strix Scar 15设备配备了一个 英特尔酷睿i9-12900HCPU和一个150WNvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU.
显然,带有液态金属热界面材料(TIM)的酷睿i9-12900H是所有2022年Scar 15 SKU上事实上的处理器选项,至少在印度是如此。然而,GPU选项的范围是140W的RTX 3060到150瓦的RTX 3080 Ti.
测试条件
下表说明了PL1和PL2值在每个选择的电源配置文件中的变化。我们建议在高负荷工作和游戏中使用涡轮增压模式,如果风扇的噪音水平不是问题的话。
性能模式 | PL1 / Tau | PL2 / Tau |
---|---|---|
静音 | 45 W / 56 s | 70 W / 2.44 ms |
性能 | 80 W / 56 s | 90 W / 2.44 ms |
Turbo | 135 W / 56 s | 135 W / 2.44 ms |
在我们的测试中,我们选择了涡轮模式,因为它允许酷睿i9-12900H以无锁的135W PL1/PL2充分施展其肌肉。在适用的情况下,我们提供了各种性能模式之间的比较数据。
处理器
酷睿i9-12900H是第12代桤木湖部件,有14个核心(6P+8E)和20个线程。华硕实施了强大的冷却系统,确保酷睿i9-12900H能够提供持续的性能,在Cinebench R15多核循环测试中没有太多节流。
有趣的是,我们观察到 酷睿i7-12700H在 联想Legion 5i Pro 16 G7提供了略高的多核性能的全面性。然而,酷睿i9-12900H在单核负载方面确实有优势。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
酷睿i9-12900H似乎也有轻微的优势。 酷睿i9-12900HK在MSI Raider GE66 12UHS中,Core i9-12900H似乎也比Core i9-12900HK略胜一筹,但与MSI Raider GE66 12UHS中未锁定乘数的Alder Lake芯片打成平手。 Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5在单核Cinebench测试中与Alder Lake芯片持平。
在电池方面,ROG Strix Scar 15切换到静音电源计划。这导致Cinebench R20的多核性能大幅下降40%,单核数据下降50%。
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (15229 - 19064, n=7) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 19282, n=170, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1805 - 1921, n=7) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 1920, n=169, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5329 - 7109, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 7382, n=231, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (728 - 738, n=7) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 740, n=231, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2449 - 3077, n=7) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 3077, n=243, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (273 - 277, n=7) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 277, n=233, last 2 years) |
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (168 - 1259, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (173.7 - 217, n=7) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (64146 - 73489, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 83533, n=231, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5881 - 6120, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 6582, n=231, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11794 - 14376, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 14294, n=223, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1820 - 1892, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 1933, n=223, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (17.2 - 22.5, n=7) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 22.5, n=232, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 332, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (39 - 44.4, n=7) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Gaming (0.412 - 4.47, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.4377, n=7) | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 |
* ... smaller is better
下图说明了在Cinebench R15多核循环中,不同的CPU参数在每种性能模式下的变化。Turbo允许Core i9-12900H使用135 W,但这不会持续超过10秒。在循环的大部分时间里,CPU最终定格在~100W。在这个过程中,平均核心温度达到90℃,而时钟达到4.1GHz到4.2GHz之间。
在性能模式下,最初需要90瓦的封装功率,但从第六次循环开始,这个功率就稳定在80瓦。核心温度在这里也达到了90℃,但处理器只能在几个间隔内触及4GHz以上。
静音模式开始时接近60瓦,但在接近30瓦的时候就稳定下来。正如预期的那样,这导致较低的CPU时钟通常在2GHz附近,偶尔会飙升到3.5GHz。该模式下的温度相当低,为70℃。
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 19199, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7594 - 10077, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 117712, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (35010 - 43760, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (101357 - 107003, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 132615, n=186, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (9125 - 10383, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 17639, n=186, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 64776, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20833 - 28598, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (61517 - 107508, n=7) | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (11368 - 166300, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 10472, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4417 - 6068, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (27374 - 43917, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 46643, n=186, last 2 years) |
查看我们专门的 英特尔酷睿i9-12900H页面,了解更多的基准和性能比较。
系统性能
系统性能在预期范围内,与类似配置的设备相当。我们没有注意到在一般的生产力或网络浏览任务中出现任何障碍。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (12007 - 12541, n=2) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average of class Gaming (3670 - 13098, n=191, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2108, n=30, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2062, n=30, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2165, n=30, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2230, n=30, last 2 years) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 6245 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6416 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7904 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (45395 - 74264, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 77803, n=186, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (48866 - 69882, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 76185, n=186, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (46932 - 65518, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 66256, n=186, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402R | |
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI Pulse GL66 12UEK | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 |
* ... smaller is better
我们专门的 DPC 延迟排行页面提供了更多经过审查的设备之间的延迟比较。