Notebookcheck

惠普Victus 16游戏笔记本电脑回顾。时尚外壳下的强大硬件

Nvidia GPU与AMD CPU相遇。 惠普的产品喜欢在视觉上将自己与大众区分开来。通过Victus 16,制造商提出了一个优雅的16英寸格式的游戏笔记本电脑,包括一些强大的组件。
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Gaming Geforce Ryzen (Zen) Laptop / Notebook

全新的HP Victus 16有各种设备配置。我们的测试设备,标签为e0179ng,售价近1400欧元(约1641美元),包含一个强大的 GeForce RTX 3060与6GB的GDDR6-VRAM和一个非常强大的 Ryzen 7 5800H.它们伴随着双通道模式的16GB内存(2x 8GB DDR4-3.200)和一个大的、1TB NVMe SSD。显示屏是一个基于IPS的16.1英寸哑光面板,分辨率为1920 x 1080像素,支持FreeSync。Windows 10 Home 64位被预装为操作系统

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
HP Victus 16-e0179ng (Victus 16 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6144 MB, Core: 1425 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 95 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 462.80, Switchable Graphics
Memory
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, dual channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
16.10 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 137 PPI, BOE09BE, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, 1024 GB 
, NVMe-SSD, two M.2-slots (one in use)
Soundcard
Realtek ALC245 @ AMD K19.5 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined audio port, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Networking
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.5 x 370 x 260
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 200 Watt power supply, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.473 kg, Power Supply: 500 g
Price
1399 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

胜利者16-e0179ng的竞争对手包括其他配备GeForce RTX 3060的游戏笔记本电脑,如 联想Legion 5 15ACH,的竞争者包括其他带有RTX 3060的游戏笔记本,如联想 5 15ACH, Alienware m15 R5,以及 华硕TUF F15 FX506HM.这些竞争对手也被列为我们下面图表中的对比设备。

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.3 %
10/2021
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.10"1920x1080
83.4 %
09/2021
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.7 %
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22.85 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.9 %
10/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080

案例

惠普笔记本电脑以其独特的设计而闻名。Victus 16在这里也不例外,在视觉上与竞争对手有许多不同之处。除了显示屏盖子上的V字(不幸的是,它非常容易沾染指纹),机箱底部的风扇通风口的漂亮设计也提供了一个个性化的外观。尽管有众多的设计元素,这款机箱看起来并不过分俏皮,仍然相当低调,这主要是由于采用了深色的颜色。

在建造质量方面,Victus 16给人留下了一些混合的感觉。例如塑料表面,在某些地方(盖板和触摸板区域)容易产生咔哒声可以更加坚固铰链也不完美。首先,当我们打开显示屏盖子时,底座也会随之轻微移动 ,其次,表面的振动也会导致显示屏的晃动超过常规的晃动。另一方面,做工方面几乎没有任何抱怨的理由。 我们测试设备的几乎所有外壳元素都显示出干净的过渡。然而,由于边缘设计,一些角落仍然感觉相当尖锐,所以它们在使用笔记本电脑时可能会引起一些不适。

HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16

在2.5公斤(约5.5磅),Victus 16的重量与竞争对手相似。只有华硕TUF F15要轻一些,为2.3公斤(约5磅)。在高度方面,2.35厘米(约0.93英寸)的 16英寸笔记本电脑给人以纤细的印象,位于更纤细的Alienware m15 R5和更厚的联想Legion 5之间。

Size Comparison

370 mm 260 mm 23.5 mm 2.5 kg363 mm 261 mm 26 mm 2.5 kg359 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.3 kg356.2 mm 272.5 mm 22.85 mm 2.5 kg

装备

连接方式

连接设备已经不是很新潮了。由于AMD的原因,这款笔记本电脑不得不放弃Thunderbolt。然而,四个可用的USB端口(3x Type-A,1x Type-C)只支持3.2 Gen1,这相当于旧的3.0标准,是一个不必要的限制。至少Type-C端口能够进行DisplayPort输出,因此,与HDMI 2.1端口和内置显示器一起,你可以运行多达三个显示器。连接由一个RJ45端口、一个音频端口(耳机/麦克风组合端口)和一个读卡器完成。

由于大部分连接都放在两边的后半部分,所以很容易使用外部鼠标,特别是对于右手用户。

左侧:电源连接、RJ45-LAN、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.0、USB-C 3.0(包括显示端口)、音频端口、读卡器
左侧:电源连接、RJ45-LAN、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.0、USB-C 3.0(包括显示端口)、音频端口、读卡器
右侧:2个USB-A 3.0
右侧:2个USB-A 3.0

SD卡阅读器

读卡器(SD/SDHC/SDXC)的性能一般。在连续读取和传输照片时,勉强达到80MB/s,低于游戏笔记本电脑的平均水平。但至少Victus 16有一个读卡器,而所有的竞争对手在这方面都失败了。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 222, n=93, last 2 years)
117 MB/s ∼100% +56%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75 MB/s ∼64%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 257, n=93, last 2 years)
131 MB/s ∼100% +70%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s ∼59%

沟通

来自Realtek的通信模块处理无线通信。虽然RTL8852AE在技术方面处于相当当前的水平(Wi-Fi 6),但在我们使用Netgear Nighthawk AX12路由器进行的范围测试中(1米距离),测量结果并不真正令人信服。例如,在接收数据方面,Victus 16排在最后一位。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1371 (925min - 1499max) MBit/s ∼100% +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (496 - 1645, n=160, last 2 years)
1154 MBit/s ∼84% +24%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
928 (483min - 1003max) MBit/s ∼68%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
787 (675min - 851max) MBit/s ∼57% -15%
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (424 - 928, n=13)
761 MBit/s ∼56% -18%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
561 (310min - 825max) MBit/s ∼41% -40%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1330 (711min - 1563max) MBit/s ∼100% +82%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=160, last 2 years)
1217 MBit/s ∼92% +66%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
878 (827min - 896max) MBit/s ∼66% +20%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
828 (634min - 900max) MBit/s ∼62% +13%
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (621 - 855, n=13)
766 MBit/s ∼58% +5%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
732 (376min - 763max) MBit/s ∼55%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010003767537547267437287417307457447487327637317227337287527297387197347056957247087047227217143767537547267437287417307457447487327637317227337287527297387197347056957247087047227217144838899349779258661003929903954926907925924928925927940929928925920920919918923919919919935Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø719 (376-763)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø911 (483-1003)

网络摄像头

正如我们习惯于从大多数笔记本电脑上看到的那样,网络摄像头的质量是有限的。除了颜色的准确性外,图像的清晰度也令人失望。

ColorChecker
22.1 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
23 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
28 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Victus 16-e0179ng: 19.03 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 27.99 ∆E

辅料

盒子里包含的只是一份快速入门指南和一个漂亮的200瓦的电源。

维护

你不仅需要一个小的螺丝刀来拧小的飞利浦螺丝,才能接触到内部,而且你还需要很好地结合细腻的触感和力量。箱子的底部是紧固的,特别是在后面。在你最终成功打开机箱后,迎接你的是一个干净的展示。掌托下面的空间完全被电池占据了。后面是两个内存插槽和两个M.2插槽(每个都有一个冷却元件)。冷却系统由两个风扇、几个热管和相对较大的金属表面组成。

HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16

输入设备

键盘

Victus 16使用了一个略微非传统的键盘布局。电源键的位置和插入键、删除键以及><|键的位置一样不寻常(见图)。德国用户还必须适应单行的回车键。还有更多的负分是,那些微不足道的方向键几乎不适合用于游戏。另一方面,16英寸笔记本电脑提供了一个完整的数字块。我们会将打字体验评价为 "良好"(压力点、行程等),尽管按键的形状有一个真正的优势。

HP Victus 16

触摸板

除了稳定性不理想外,触摸板的性能很好。它的宽度为12.5厘米(约4.9英寸),深度为8厘米(约3.1英寸),是令人愉快的大。尽管表面感觉比许多竞争者的光滑程度稍差,但所有的鼠标动作都很容易成功。手势支持,如用两个手指缩放和滚动,也能可靠地工作。一个小问题:底部边缘的左右点击会产生轻微的咔哒声,这让人对笔记本电脑的质量印象大打折扣。

显示

虽然一些竞争对手提供了平庸的显示器(其中第一个是华硕TUF F15),但Victus 16-e0179ng的144-Hz面板几乎在每个方面都有成绩。

339
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE09BE
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 361 cd/m² Average: 341 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 361 cd/m²
Contrast: 1203:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.44 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1.26
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
73.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.268
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
B156HAN12.H, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
-7%
-40%
Display P3 Coverage
72.6
65.4
-10%
41.9
-42%
sRGB Coverage
100
96.3
-4%
62.9
-37%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
73.5
67.5
-8%
43.3
-41%
Response Times
-3%
50%
-123%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
13.6 ?(6.8, 6.8)
-42%
4 ?(1.2, 2.8)
58%
28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8)
-196%
Response Time Black / White *
14.4 ?(8.4, 6)
9.2 ?(4.4, 4.8)
36%
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
42%
21.6 ?(11.6, 10)
-50%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-14%
3%
-59%
Brightness middle
361
350
-3%
329
-9%
268.3
-26%
Brightness
341
350
3%
321
-6%
257
-25%
Brightness Distribution
88
96
9%
92
5%
84
-5%
Black Level *
0.3
0.3
-0%
0.27
10%
0.34
-13%
Contrast
1203
1167
-3%
1219
1%
789
-34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.44
3.9
-60%
2.78
-14%
5.05
-107%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.37
8.2
-29%
4.88
23%
15.43
-142%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.26
1.6
-27%
1.63
-29%
3.21
-155%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.6
5.5
-20%
2.5
46%
5.5
-20%
Gamma
2.268 97%
2.15 102%
2.106 104%
2.35 94%
CCT
6609 98%
7414 88%
6201 105%
7392 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
76
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-8% / -11%
27% / 12%
-74% / -64%

* ... smaller is better

这要从色彩空间的覆盖率说起,它测量的是100%的sRGB和近74%的AdobeRGB。这对一台游戏笔记本电脑来说是相当多的。响应时间约为10毫秒,也是不错的。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:饱和度
卡尔曼:饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

16英寸的屏幕在其他测量中也留下了令人信服的印象。相对较低的黑值(0.3cd/m²)和可接受的亮度(平均341cd/m²)导致了约1200:1的对比度。再加上交付状态下相对较好的色彩再现,这确保了鲜艳而有区别的显示图像。

惠普Victus 16与sRGB对比
惠普Victus 16与sRGB对比
子像素网格
子像素网格
惠普Victus 16 VS AdobeRGB
惠普Victus 16 VS AdobeRGB

另一个积极的观点是,在我们的测试装置中,我们没有看到任何由于PWM或 任何类似的原因导致的显示闪烁。

背光
背光
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17043 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

测试条件

那些喜欢微调性能的人应该对Omen Gaming Hub感到高兴。Victus Laptop "菜单提供了系统监控(温度、负载......)、网络助推器和性能控制等选项卡。在后者中,我们选择了带有自动风扇速度的 "性能 "模式进行测量。

奥门游戏中心
奥门游戏中心
奥门游戏中心

业绩

考虑到GeForce RTX 3060,Victus 16-e0179ng应该在较低的高端范围内解决,尽管6GB的VRAM在这一点上已经不是最先进的了。16GB的内存和1TB的固态硬盘应该能满足大多数买家的需求,并在未来几年内足够使用。AMD的八核处理器也是如此。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

处理器

淘宝网笔记本上的Ryzen 7 5800H被认为是笔记本电脑领域的绝对顶级。这个基于7纳米的八核模型包含16MB L3缓存,并能够通过SMT在16个线程上并行工作,不必躲在英特尔竞争对手的后面。事实上,情况恰恰相反。

正如我们的Cinebench R15循环所示,5800H的性能达到了酷睿i7-11800H的水平,后者也被指定为45瓦TDP。然而,较新的基准测试,如Cinebench R23显示,Victus 16中的处理器无法发挥其全部潜力。在其他设备中,AMD的CPU所取得的性能要高出不同的百分点。5800H的基本时钟速度也是3.2GHz。在负载情况下,由于自动涡轮增压,最高可达到4.4 GHz。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

011022033044055066077088099011001210132014301540165017601870198020901982.461976.681979.021960.781971.81966.761952.361958.581963.381968.311972.291971.611953.791964.731976.191969.381960.51970.151962.521963.481964.251967.051957.521968.021970.152119.212127.772130.272107.592124.382114.052118.422128.112107.72124.952121.232122.352114.952128.112121.232127.092124.612133.92117.5221212126.532141.442132.882124.162121.342004.511985.011987.281974.921976.971980.591991.541952.171981.571984.321959.251954.561967.921976.481981.871983.341984.131985.511971.321921.881983.341989.461978.531987.381978.242095.122011.162009.651997.12025.521980.11977.072020.711989.361994.221987.782022.352011.261993.922003.411990.842000.31987.782004.912004.911997.11978.531997.11978.531986.291980.11963.381993.921997.12000.31998.71983.141998.72008.032015.931978.921987.782017.551964.931964.932001.72019.182004.911974.041998.71980.22012.781995.512000.31981.67Tooltip
HP Victus 16-e0179ng AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1967 (1952.36-1982.46)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2123 (2107.59-2141.44)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1977 (1921.88-2004.51)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1997 (1963.38-2095.12)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
231 Points ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points ∼99% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (209 - 234, n=16)
229 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
225 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (108 - 254, n=196, last 2 years)
203 Points ∼88% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2119 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
2095 (1963.38min - 2095.12max) Points ∼99% +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1920 - 2119, n=15)
2018 Points ∼95% +2%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2005 (1921.88min - 2004.51max) Points ∼95% +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1982 (1952.36min - 1982.46max) Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (536 - 2804, n=207, last 2 years)
1599 Points ∼75% -19%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5182 Points ∼100% +24%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5020 Points ∼97% +20%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4711 Points ∼91% +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (3993 - 5020, n=18)
4653 Points ∼90% +12%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4172 Points ∼81%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=190, last 2 years)
3756 Points ∼72% -10%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points ∼100% +6%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
559 Points ∼96% +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points ∼95%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
550 Points ∼95% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (502 - 559, n=17)
547 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 634, n=189, last 2 years)
499 Points ∼86% -9%
Cinebench R23
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
13445 (12565.7min - 13444.6max) Points ∼100% +33%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13028 Points ∼97% +29%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12195 Points ∼91% +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (10097 - 13214, n=16)
12049 Points ∼90% +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (4621 - 14363, n=87, last 2 years)
10876 Points ∼81% +8%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10097 Points ∼75%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
1509 Points ∼100% +7%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1430 Points ∼95% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1410 Points ∼93% 0%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1407 Points ∼93%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1294 - 1441, n=16)
1405 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1095 - 1619, n=86, last 2 years)
1367 Points ∼91% -3%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 555, n=172, last 2 years)
314 Seconds * ∼100% -23%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
256 Seconds * ∼82%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
253 Seconds * ∼81% +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (237 - 268, n=16)
253 Seconds * ∼81% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
239 Seconds * ∼76% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
235 Seconds * ∼75% +8%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56716 MIPS ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (52444 - 57284, n=16)
54729 MIPS ∼96% -4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53902 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53239 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
51046 MIPS ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (15146 - 75612, n=173, last 2 years)
44903 MIPS ∼79% -21%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5659 MIPS ∼100% +2%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5591 MIPS ∼99% 0%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5575 MIPS ∼99%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5038 - 5632, n=16)
5482 MIPS ∼97% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5448 MIPS ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2945 - 6174, n=173, last 2 years)
5242 MIPS ∼93% -6%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7899 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (7438 - 8244, n=15)
7716 Points ∼98% -2%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7522 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7508 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=171, last 2 years)
7176 Points ∼91% -9%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1481 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1462 Points ∼99% +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1347 - 1481, n=15)
1441 Points ∼97% 0%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1436 Points ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1777, n=171, last 2 years)
1308 Points ∼88% -9%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.6 fps ∼100% +3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.1 fps ∼97%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15 fps ∼96% -1%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.7 fps ∼94% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (13.4 - 16.1, n=16)
14.7 fps ∼94% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.13 - 19.8, n=172, last 2 years)
12.4 fps ∼79% -18%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
113 s * ∼100% -100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (47.4 - 113, n=16)
70.4 s * ∼62% -25%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57.4 s * ∼51% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56.4 s * ∼50%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 113, n=165, last 2 years)
54.6 s * ∼48% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
44.5 s * ∼39% +21%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.4907 - 1.088, n=167, last 2 years)
0.581 sec * ∼100% -12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * ∼96% -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.539 sec * ∼93% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (0.512 - 0.559, n=15)
0.526 sec * ∼91% -2%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.524 sec * ∼90% -1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.518 sec * ∼89%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1982 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
158 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
231 Points
Help

系统性能

在PCMark 10系统测试中,Victus最终排名倒数第二。然而,这些差异相对较小,在实际操作中应该很难察觉。从主观上看,操作系统的响应速度与我们对当前游戏笔记本电脑的期望一样快。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6865 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6648 Points ∼97% +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6465 - 6855, n=4)
6634 Points ∼97% +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6567 Points ∼96%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
6465 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (3952 - 7884, n=175, last 2 years)
6131 Points ∼89% -7%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10522 Points ∼100% +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
10396 Points ∼99% +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (9589 - 10414, n=4)
10086 Points ∼96% +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9943 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11266, n=174, last 2 years)
9656 Points ∼92% -3%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
9589 Points ∼91% -4%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9728 Points ∼100% +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (8840 - 9728, n=4)
9101 Points ∼94% +2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8923 Points ∼92%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8913 Points ∼92% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8859 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (5813 - 10066, n=174, last 2 years)
8286 Points ∼85% -7%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9423 Points ∼100% +9%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8660 Points ∼92%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (7884 - 9497, n=4)
8656 Points ∼92% 0%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8582 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 12250, n=174, last 2 years)
7939 Points ∼84% -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7884 Points ∼84% -9%
PCMark 10 Score
6567 points
Help

DPC延迟

在延迟方面还有一些优化的空间。LatencyMon工具报告说,Victus 16在交付状态下对音频和/或视频内容的实时处理有一些问题。不过,大多数用户应该不会注意到这个问题。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1431.2 μs * ∼100% -23%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1160.8 μs * ∼81%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
703 μs * ∼49% +39%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
428.6 μs * ∼30% +63%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

作为存储解决方案,惠普在我们的测试装置中使用了西部数据的NVMe驱动器。西部数据PC SN730的1TB版本超越了大多数使用美光、东芝或SK海力士固态硬盘的竞争对手的固态硬盘,特别是在AS固态硬盘的基准中。同样非常有用的是,那些想要扩展存储的人可以在引擎盖下找到一个空的M.2插槽。

HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
4%
-22%
3%
Write 4K
157.3
124.59
-21%
116.95
-26%
168.1
7%
Read 4K
49
54.18
11%
44.56
-9%
65.09
33%
Write Seq
2983
2705.77
-9%
1551.63
-48%
2124
-29%
Read Seq
2247
2297.9
2%
1682.12
-25%
2204
-2%
Write 4K Q32T1
395
499.66
26%
497.75
26%
455.3
15%
Read 4K Q32T1
556.5
570.23
2%
436.8
-22%
465.6
-16%
Write Seq Q32T1
3094
2998.9
-3%
1461.4
-53%
2911
-6%
Read Seq Q32T1
2871
3460.5
21%
2363.9
-18%
3519
23%
AS SSD
-27%
-80%
-13%
Seq Read
2382.87
2960
24%
2082
-13%
2872.59
21%
Seq Write
2465.99
2586
5%
825
-67%
1619.38
-34%
4K Read
44.14
46.84
6%
42.41
-4%
57.51
30%
4K Write
117.46
96.08
-18%
98.28
-16%
149.57
27%
4K-64 Read
1734.11
854.08
-51%
1255.39
-28%
1251.93
-28%
4K-64 Write
2088.37
2015.02
-4%
737.69
-65%
2196.29
5%
Access Time Read *
0.049
0.048
2%
0.109
-122%
0.04
18%
Access Time Write *
0.032
0.094
-194%
0.17
-431%
0.082
-156%
Score Read
2017
1197
-41%
1506
-25%
1597
-21%
Score Write
2452
2370
-3%
918
-63%
2508
2%
Score Total
5503
4170
-24%
3136
-43%
4869
-12%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -14%
-51% / -55%
-5% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2871 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3094 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 556.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 395 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2247 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2983 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 49 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 157.3 MB/s

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

014529043558072587010151160130514501595174018852030217523202465261027552511.772882.332882.542882.752882.752882.752882.752882.752882.952882.952882.952883.162883.162883.162883.162883.162883.372883.372883.372883.372883.372883.372883.372883.372883.372883.372883.582883.582883.582883.582883.582883.582883.582883.582883.582883.582883.792883.792883.792883.792883.7928842884288428842884.212884.212884.422884.422884.63Tooltip
: Ø2876 (2511.77-2884.63)

图形卡

与之相反的是 GeForce RTX 3050(Ti),由于其微薄的视频存储只有4GB,并没有提供任何特别的保证和对未来的感觉。 GeForce RTX 3060对于注重价格的游戏玩家来说是一个不错的选择。Nvidia安培一代的DirectX 12型号至少有6GB的GDDR6 VRAM,目前还是足够的。

然而,与CPU性能类似,与竞争对手相比,Victus 16的GPU性能也大多低于平均值。这并不奇怪,因为惠普只为RTX 3060配置了95瓦的TGP(包括动态提升)。理论上,高达130瓦是可能的,例如联想用Legion 5显示。在合成图形基准测试和游戏运行中,那台笔记本电脑往往比惠普的设备领先10%以上。

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
29164 Points ∼100% +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
27898 Points ∼96% +11%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
26881 Points ∼92% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1925 - 43077, n=186, last 2 years)
26874 Points ∼92% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (22063 - 30200, n=18)
26016 Points ∼89% +3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
25142 Points ∼86%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21806 Points ∼100% +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21111 Points ∼97% +12%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
20312 Points ∼93% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1360 - 34993, n=194, last 2 years)
20253 Points ∼93% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (16956 - 22460, n=20)
19938 Points ∼91% +6%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
18806 Points ∼86%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8844 Points ∼100% +19%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8295 Points ∼94% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6475 - 8844, n=20)
7782 Points ∼88% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (429 - 13210, n=198, last 2 years)
7732 Points ∼87% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7677 Points ∼87% +3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7450 Points ∼84%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (425 - 8032, n=116, last 2 years)
4866 Points ∼100% +11%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4852 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4795 Points ∼99% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (3724 - 5280, n=13)
4604 Points ∼95% +5%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4394 Points ∼90%
3DMark 11 Performance
22166 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
45994 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17711 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7680 points
Help

游戏性能

尽管TGP相对较低,但Victus在现代游戏中占有一席之地。除了"孤岛危机重制版"以外,所有测试的游戏都能以60帧以上的速度运行,即使是在最大细节设置下。即使是要求极高、对VRAM要求很高的游戏也是如此,比如最近推出的 "死神"。死神"。."

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
143.9 (136min - 155max) fps ∼100% +7%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
142 fps ∼99% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (128 - 155, n=16)
140 fps ∼97% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (42.1 - 242, n=153, last 2 years)
139 fps ∼97% +3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
135 (114min) fps ∼94%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (24.3 - 123, n=196, last 2 years)
77.8 fps ∼100% +10%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
75.6 (64min) fps ∼97% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
75.3 (73min - 79max) fps ∼97% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (62.8 - 88.5, n=21)
74.4 fps ∼96% +5%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
70.9 (60min) fps ∼91%

除了一些较小的FPS波动外,用" "进行的恒定负载测试。的测试。Witcher 3"显示没有任何异常。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

051015202530354045505560657075727273727272737272727272727273727272727272727272727172727272727272717272727172727272717271727172717271717271717171717272717272717271717271717272717272727172727172727172717271727171717172717271727171727171727172727173727272727372717272727271727273717273727271727271727172727172727272727272727272727272717272727271727272727272727271727272727272727272727271717272727272727271727272727272727372727272727273727272727272727273727273727272727272727172717271727271727272727172727272717272727272727172727172727172727271727272727272727272727273727272737272737272727372727372727272737272727372727273727272737173717371727272727272727272727272727272727271737272727272717172727172737272737273727273727372727372727372727272727272737273727272727172727272727271727271727272727172727271727272727172727271727272717272717272717271727271727272717271727172727271717271727171717072717271717271717172717172717171717271717172717171717171717172717171727171717171717170717170717171717071707171707171717171717171717170717070707071707070707170707070707070707071707070707169707070707170707071707170707170707170707170707071707070707070717070707071707070707170707070706970707070707170707070707070717070707070697071697070707070707070716970707069707070697070697069707070707070706970707070697070707070707169707070707070707070707070707170707070707070707070707070707071707070707170707070717070697071707070717070707170707071707070707170707071707071707070707170697071707070717070717071707070717071707071707070717071707170717071707170717071707071707170717071707170717070717071707170717170717071707170717170717071707170717170707170717170717071717071717071717171707171717071717071717071717071717170717170717170707071717071717171707171717171707171717071717170717170717170717171707171707170707171717071707171717169707069706970706970707069707069707070707069707070707069707070706970707070706970707069697070707070697070707070707070707070707070707070707070707070707070707170707070707070717070707070707070707071707070707070707071707070707071707070707070707170717271717171717170707171727171717171717271717171717171717171707271717170717071717171707171717171717171717171717071717171717171707171717170717171717071717071717170717271717171717072707171717171717171717170717171717170717171717171717171717171717171717171717171717071717171717171717171717171717170707171717171717171717171707070707170707071707170707170707170707171717170717170717171717171697071717170717170717170717171717171717171717171717171707170717071707170717170717171717071717171707171717071717170717171707171717071717170717070707071717071707171707171707171717271717172717172717172717271717172717172717271717271717272717172717271727172727071717272717271727172717272717272727172717272717271727271727271727172717271727271727172717270717172727172717172717172717272717271727172717271727171727171727172717172717172717172717171717271717271727171727171717271717171727171717271717172717271717172717172717171717172717171727171717172717271717172717171717271717172717171727171717171727171717271717171727171717070717171717170717171717171717171717171717171717071717071707170717070707071717071717071707170717170717170717170717071707170717071717171707170717170717170717070717170717071717071707170717071707170717071717170717071707071707170707170707071707070717071707170707070707170707170707170707071707071717070717071717071717171707171717171717171717272717271727172727172717272717272717271717171717171727171717171717171717171717171727171717171717171717171717171717171717071717071717171717071717171717171717171717171717071717171717171717171707170717171717070707171717171707171717171707171717071717171717171707171717071717171707170707171717171717171717170717171717171707171717170717171717071717071717070707171707171707170717170717071707171707171707171707070717171707171707170717171707171717071717171707171717171717171717171717171717171717171717171717171717171717171717171717171717071717171717171717271717171717171717171717070717171717171727172717271717271717271727171727172717271717271717271717271727171727171727171646968696869686968696868696868696869696869686969696869686869696869686969686968696869696869696968696968696968696968696869686868686768686768686868676868676868686868676868676868686768676867686869686968686869686968686869686869686868686868696868696869686968696968696868696969686968696968696869696869686869696868696869686968696869686869686968686968686968686868686868696869686868686869686869686868696868676868686768686868676868676868686867686867686768676867686768676868676767686768686768676867686868686768676867686867686768686768676868676867686768686768676868686768686767686768676768676867686768676667676768676768676767676867676767686767686767686767676767676667676767686768676767676867686867686768686867686867676867686867686667686768676767686767686867686767676768676767676767676867676767676867676768676667676768676767676767676767676767676767676767686767676767676767676767676768676767676767676767676867676767676767666767676767676767676767666767676767676666666666676665676566666666666666666665676665676665666666666666666667666666666667666666666766666667666666666666676666666666676666666667666666676666666666676666676666676666676667666667666667666766666666676666676666666766666666676666676666676666676667676667666767666766676666666766676667676667676667676766676766676766676766676766676667676667676667676766676767676666676667666767666767676869686867696768686968686868686868686868686868696868686868696868686968686869686869686968686969687070706970707070697069697070707070707069707070706970707069707070707070707070697071706970707070707070707170707070717070707171717171727170707172717271727171727172717271727172727172727172717272727172717271717272727272717272727371727272727272727272727272727272717272727172727272717272727271727272727272727271727272727272727272727272727272727272727271727272727271727272717272717271727171727171717271717171727171727172717271717171727172717171727172717172717172717172717271717271727171727171717272717271717271717271717271727172717271727172717271727172717171717271727172717271727172717271727172717271727171727171717170717271727171717172717171727171717171717271717171717172717170717171707172717171727171717171717271717172717171727171717271717171717171717170717171717071717170707071717171717071717071717170717071717171717171717171717171707171717171717171717071727171727171717271727172717271727172717271727171727172717271727172717272717271727271727172727272717272717272727372727272727372727372737272737273727372737273727372727372737273727372737273727372717172727172727272717272717272717272717271727172727271727172727172717271717171727271727172727172717272717172727172727172717272717271727170727272717272717271727172717271717271717271717172717172717171727171727171727171717170717170707070717171717071717071717170717170717170717171707171707171707171717171707171717171717171707171717171707071706969696869696869686968696969686969686968696869696869686969686869686869686868696868686869686869686868696868686868686867676867666767676667676766676667676667676766676767666766676666666766676766676767676767676767676866686667686767676767676767666868676868676867686868686768686768686868686867676867676868686768686868676868676868676768686768686867686867686868676767686768686867686867686867686867686867686867686768686768686767686768686768676768686768676868676867686867686768676867686768676867686867686867686768676868676867686867686867686867686867686867686768686768676867686867686768686768686667676867686867686768686768686767676867676868676867686867686767676768686768686768686768676868686768676867686867676767686867676868676768686768686768686768676868676868676867686868676868676868676868686768686768686867686867686868676868676868686768686867767575757575767575767575757576757575757575757575757575767576757576757676767576767676767675777576767676757676767675767676757676757676767675767675757675767576767576757675757675767576757675767575767575767575767576767576757675767576757676757675767675767675767675767576757675767576767576757675757675767576757676757676