Notebookcheck Logo

惠普Victus 16游戏笔记本电脑回顾。时尚外壳下的强大硬件

Nvidia GPU与AMD CPU相遇。 惠普的产品喜欢在视觉上将自己与大众区分开来。通过Victus 16,制造商提出了一个优雅的16英寸格式的游戏笔记本电脑,包括一些强大的组件。
Gaming Geforce Ryzen (Zen) Laptop / Notebook

全新的HP Victus 16有各种设备配置。我们的测试设备,标签为e0179ng,售价近1400欧元(约1641美元),包含一个强大的 GeForce RTX 3060与6GB的GDDR6-VRAM和一个非常强大的 Ryzen 7 5800H.它们伴随着双通道模式的16GB内存(2x 8GB DDR4-3.200)和一个大的、1TB NVMe SSD。显示屏是一个基于IPS的16.1英寸哑光面板,分辨率为1920 x 1080像素,支持FreeSync。Windows 10 Home 64位被预装为操作系统

HP Victus 16-e0179ng (Victus 16 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1425 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 95 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 462.80, Switchable Graphics
Memory
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, dual channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
16.10 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 137 PPI, BOE09BE, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, 1024 GB 
, NVMe-SSD, two M.2-slots (one in use)
Soundcard
Realtek ALC245 @ AMD K19.5 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined audio port, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Networking
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.5 x 370 x 260
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 200 Watt power supply, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.473 kg, Power Supply: 500 g
Price
1399 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

胜利者16-e0179ng的竞争对手包括其他配备GeForce RTX 3060的游戏笔记本电脑,如 联想Legion 5 15ACH,的竞争者包括其他带有RTX 3060的游戏笔记本,如联想 5 15ACH, Alienware m15 R5,以及 华硕TUF F15 FX506HM.这些竞争对手也被列为我们下面图表中的对比设备。

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.3 %
10/2021
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.10"1920x1080
83.4 %
09/2021
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.7 %
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22.85 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.9 %
10/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080

案例

惠普笔记本电脑以其独特的设计而闻名。Victus 16在这里也不例外,在视觉上与竞争对手有许多不同之处。除了显示屏盖子上的V字(不幸的是,它非常容易沾染指纹),机箱底部的风扇通风口的漂亮设计也提供了一个个性化的外观。尽管有众多的设计元素,这款机箱看起来并不过分俏皮,仍然相当低调,这主要是由于采用了深色的颜色。

在建造质量方面,Victus 16给人留下了一些混合的感觉。例如塑料表面,在某些地方(盖板和触摸板区域)容易产生咔哒声可以更加坚固铰链也不完美。首先,当我们打开显示屏盖子时,底座也会随之轻微移动 ,其次,表面的振动也会导致显示屏的晃动超过常规的晃动。另一方面,做工方面几乎没有任何抱怨的理由。 我们测试设备的几乎所有外壳元素都显示出干净的过渡。然而,由于边缘设计,一些角落仍然感觉相当尖锐,所以它们在使用笔记本电脑时可能会引起一些不适。

HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16

在2.5公斤(约5.5磅),Victus 16的重量与竞争对手相似。只有华硕TUF F15要轻一些,为2.3公斤(约5磅)。在高度方面,2.35厘米(约0.93英寸)的 16英寸笔记本电脑给人以纤细的印象,位于更纤细的Alienware m15 R5和更厚的联想Legion 5之间。

Size Comparison

370 mm 260 mm 23.5 mm 2.5 kg363 mm 261 mm 26 mm 2.5 kg359 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.3 kg356.2 mm 272.5 mm 22.85 mm 2.5 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

装备

连接方式

连接设备已经不是很新潮了。由于AMD的原因,这款笔记本电脑不得不放弃Thunderbolt。然而,四个可用的USB端口(3x Type-A,1x Type-C)只支持3.2 Gen1,这相当于旧的3.0标准,是一个不必要的限制。至少Type-C端口能够进行DisplayPort输出,因此,与HDMI 2.1端口和内置显示器一起,你可以运行多达三个显示器。连接由一个RJ45端口、一个音频端口(耳机/麦克风组合端口)和一个读卡器完成。

由于大部分连接都放在两边的后半部分,所以很容易使用外部鼠标,特别是对于右手用户。

左侧:电源连接、RJ45-LAN、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.0、USB-C 3.0(包括显示端口)、音频端口、读卡器
左侧:电源连接、RJ45-LAN、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.0、USB-C 3.0(包括显示端口)、音频端口、读卡器
右侧:2个USB-A 3.0
右侧:2个USB-A 3.0

SD卡阅读器

读卡器(SD/SDHC/SDXC)的性能一般。在连续读取和传输照片时,勉强达到80MB/s,低于游戏笔记本电脑的平均水平。但至少Victus 16有一个读卡器,而所有的竞争对手在这方面都失败了。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +31%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s +58%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s

沟通

来自Realtek的通信模块处理无线通信。虽然RTL8852AE在技术方面处于相当当前的水平(Wi-Fi 6),但在我们使用Netgear Nighthawk AX12路由器进行的范围测试中(1米距离),测量结果并不真正令人信服。例如,在接收数据方面,Victus 16排在最后一位。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1371 (925min - 1499max) MBit/s +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s +23%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
928 (483min - 1003max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
787 (675min - 851max) MBit/s -15%
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (424 - 928, n=20)
787 MBit/s -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
561 (310min - 825max) MBit/s -40%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s +88%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1330 (711min - 1563max) MBit/s +82%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
878 (827min - 896max) MBit/s +20%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
828 (634min - 900max) MBit/s +13%
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (621 - 877, n=20)
745 MBit/s +2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
732 (376min - 763max) MBit/s
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000Tooltip
HP Victus 16-e0179ng; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø719 (376-763)
HP Victus 16-e0179ng; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø911 (483-1003)

网络摄像头

正如我们习惯于从大多数笔记本电脑上看到的那样,网络摄像头的质量是有限的。除了颜色的准确性外,图像的清晰度也令人失望。

ColorChecker
22.1 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
23 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
28 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Victus 16-e0179ng: 19.03 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 27.99 ∆E

辅料

盒子里包含的只是一份快速入门指南和一个漂亮的200瓦的电源。

维护

你不仅需要一个小的螺丝刀来拧小的飞利浦螺丝,才能接触到内部,而且你还需要很好地结合细腻的触感和力量。箱子的底部是紧固的,特别是在后面。在你最终成功打开机箱后,迎接你的是一个干净的展示。掌托下面的空间完全被电池占据了。后面是两个内存插槽和两个M.2插槽(每个都有一个冷却元件)。冷却系统由两个风扇、几个热管和相对较大的金属表面组成。

HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16
HP Victus 16

输入设备

键盘

Victus 16使用了一个略微非传统的键盘布局。电源键的位置和插入键、删除键以及><|键的位置一样不寻常(见图)。德国用户还必须适应单行的回车键。还有更多的负分是,那些微不足道的方向键几乎不适合用于游戏。另一方面,16英寸笔记本电脑提供了一个完整的数字块。我们会将打字体验评价为 "良好"(压力点、行程等),尽管按键的形状有一个真正的优势。

HP Victus 16

触摸板

除了稳定性不理想外,触摸板的性能很好。它的宽度为12.5厘米(约4.9英寸),深度为8厘米(约3.1英寸),是令人愉快的大。尽管表面感觉比许多竞争者的光滑程度稍差,但所有的鼠标动作都很容易成功。手势支持,如用两个手指缩放和滚动,也能可靠地工作。一个小问题:底部边缘的左右点击会产生轻微的咔哒声,这让人对笔记本电脑的质量印象大打折扣。

显示

虽然一些竞争对手提供了平庸的显示器(其中第一个是华硕TUF F15),但Victus 16-e0179ng的144-Hz面板几乎在每个方面都有成绩。

339
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE09BE tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 361 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 341 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 361 cd/m²
Contrast: 1203:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.26
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
73.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.268
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
B156HAN12.H, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
-7%
-40%
Display P3 Coverage
72.6
65.4
-10%
41.9
-42%
sRGB Coverage
100
96.3
-4%
62.9
-37%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
73.5
67.5
-8%
43.3
-41%
Response Times
-3%
50%
-123%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
13.6 ?(6.8, 6.8)
-42%
4 ?(1.2, 2.8)
58%
28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8)
-196%
Response Time Black / White *
14.4 ?(8.4, 6)
9.2 ?(4.4, 4.8)
36%
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
42%
21.6 ?(11.6, 10)
-50%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-14%
3%
-59%
Brightness middle
361
350
-3%
329
-9%
268.3
-26%
Brightness
341
350
3%
321
-6%
257
-25%
Brightness Distribution
88
96
9%
92
5%
84
-5%
Black Level *
0.3
0.3
-0%
0.27
10%
0.34
-13%
Contrast
1203
1167
-3%
1219
1%
789
-34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.44
3.9
-60%
2.78
-14%
5.05
-107%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.37
8.2
-29%
4.88
23%
15.43
-142%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.26
1.6
-27%
1.63
-29%
3.21
-155%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.6
5.5
-20%
2.5
46%
5.5
-20%
Gamma
2.268 97%
2.15 102%
2.106 104%
2.35 94%
CCT
6609 98%
7414 88%
6201 105%
7392 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
76
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-8% / -11%
27% / 12%
-74% / -64%

* ... smaller is better

这要从色彩空间的覆盖率说起,它测量的是100%的sRGB和近74%的AdobeRGB。这对一台游戏笔记本电脑来说是相当多的。响应时间约为10毫秒,也是不错的。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:饱和度
卡尔曼:饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

16英寸的屏幕在其他测量中也留下了令人信服的印象。相对较低的黑值(0.3cd/m²)和可接受的亮度(平均341cd/m²)导致了约1200:1的对比度。再加上交付状态下相对较好的色彩再现,这确保了鲜艳而有区别的显示图像。

惠普Victus 16与sRGB对比
惠普Victus 16与sRGB对比
子像素网格
子像素网格
惠普Victus 16 VS AdobeRGB
惠普Victus 16 VS AdobeRGB

另一个积极的观点是,在我们的测试装置中,我们没有看到任何由于PWM或 任何类似的原因导致的显示闪烁。

背光
背光
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

测试条件

那些喜欢微调性能的人应该对Omen Gaming Hub感到高兴。Victus Laptop "菜单提供了系统监控(温度、负载......)、网络助推器和性能控制等选项卡。在后者中,我们选择了带有自动风扇速度的 "性能 "模式进行测量。

奥门游戏中心
奥门游戏中心
奥门游戏中心

业绩

考虑到GeForce RTX 3060,Victus 16-e0179ng应该在较低的高端范围内解决,尽管6GB的VRAM在这一点上已经不是最先进的了。16GB的内存和1TB的固态硬盘应该能满足大多数买家的需求,并在未来几年内足够使用。AMD的八核处理器也是如此。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

处理器

淘宝网笔记本上的Ryzen 7 5800H被认为是笔记本电脑领域的绝对顶级。这个基于7纳米的八核模型包含16MB L3缓存,并能够通过SMT在16个线程上并行工作,不必躲在英特尔竞争对手的后面。事实上,情况恰恰相反。

正如我们的Cinebench R15循环所示,5800H的性能达到了酷睿i7-11800H的水平,后者也被指定为45瓦TDP。然而,较新的基准测试,如Cinebench R23显示,Victus 16中的处理器无法发挥其全部潜力。在其他设备中,AMD的CPU所取得的性能要高出不同的百分点。5800H的基本时钟速度也是3.2GHz。在负载情况下,由于自动涡轮增压,最高可达到4.4 GHz。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
HP Victus 16-e0179ng AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1967 (1952.36-1982.46)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2123 (2107.59-2141.44)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1977 (1921.88-2004.51)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1997 (1963.38-2095.12)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)
268 Points +16%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points 0%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
231 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (209 - 234, n=29)
228 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
225 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)
3101 Points +56%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2119 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
2095 (1963.38min - 2095.12max) Points +6%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2005 (1921.88min - 2004.51max) Points +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1982 (1952.36min - 1982.46max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1487 - 2119, n=28)
1963 Points -1%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)
7442 Points +78%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5182 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5020 Points +20%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4711 Points +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (3430 - 5020, n=31)
4568 Points +9%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4172 Points
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)
699 Points +27%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points +6%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
559 Points +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
550 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (502 - 560, n=30)
550 Points 0%
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)
19581 Points +94%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
13445 (12565.7min - 13444.6max) Points +33%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13028 Points +29%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12195 Points +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (8812 - 13214, n=29)
11794 Points +17%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10097 Points
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)
1816 Points +29%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
1509 Points +7%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1430 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1410 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1294 - 1441, n=29)
1410 Points 0%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1407 Points
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (237 - 340, n=29)
260 Seconds * -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
256 Seconds *
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
253 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
239 Seconds * +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
235 Seconds * +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
198.9 Seconds * +22%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)
77274 MIPS +36%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56716 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (45773 - 59986, n=28)
54117 MIPS -5%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53902 MIPS -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53239 MIPS -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
51046 MIPS -10%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)
6133 MIPS +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5659 MIPS +2%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5591 MIPS 0%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5575 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5038 - 5632, n=29)
5472 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5448 MIPS -2%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)
13627 Points +73%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7899 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (6551 - 9062, n=28)
7793 Points -1%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7522 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7508 Points -5%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)
1811 Points +26%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1481 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1462 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1336 - 1505, n=28)
1450 Points +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1436 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +41%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.6 fps +3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.1 fps
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15 fps -1%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.7 fps -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (11.6 - 16.1, n=29)
14.5 fps -4%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
113 s * -100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (47.4 - 113, n=29)
64.3 s * -14%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57.4 s * -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56.4 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)
49.1 s * +13%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
44.5 s * +21%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.539 sec * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (0.511 - 0.559, n=28)
0.525 sec * -1%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.524 sec * -1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.518 sec *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)
0.4687 sec * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1982 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
158 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
231 Points
Help

系统性能

在PCMark 10系统测试中,Victus最终排名倒数第二。然而,这些差异相对较小,在实际操作中应该很难察觉。从主观上看,操作系统的响应速度与我们对当前游戏笔记本电脑的期望一样快。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)
7592 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6865 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6465 - 6855, n=6)
6651 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6648 Points +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6567 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
6465 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)
10731 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10522 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
10396 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (9589 - 10414, n=6)
10019 Points +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9943 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
9589 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9728 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)
9725 Points +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (8798 - 9728, n=6)
9015 Points +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8923 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8913 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8859 Points -1%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)
11476 Points +33%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9423 Points +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (7884 - 9497, n=6)
8860 Points +2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8660 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8582 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7884 Points -9%
PCMark 10 Score
6567 points
Help

DPC延迟

在延迟方面还有一些优化的空间。LatencyMon工具报告说,Victus 16在交付状态下对音频和/或视频内容的实时处理有一些问题。不过,大多数用户应该不会注意到这个问题。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1431 μs * -23%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1161 μs *
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
703 μs * +39%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
428.6 μs * +63%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

作为存储解决方案,惠普在我们的测试装置中使用了西部数据的NVMe驱动器。西部数据PC SN730的1TB版本超越了大多数使用美光、东芝或SK海力士固态硬盘的竞争对手的固态硬盘,特别是在AS固态硬盘的基准中。同样非常有用的是,那些想要扩展存储的人可以在引擎盖下找到一个空的M.2插槽。

HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
4%
-22%
3%
Write 4K
157.3
124.6
-21%
116.9
-26%
168.1
7%
Read 4K
49
54.2
11%
44.56
-9%
65.1
33%
Write Seq
2983
2706
-9%
1552
-48%
2124
-29%
Read Seq
2247
2298
2%
1682
-25%
2204
-2%
Write 4K Q32T1
395
499.7
27%
497.8
26%
455.3
15%
Read 4K Q32T1
557
570
2%
436.8
-22%
465.6
-16%
Write Seq Q32T1
3094
2999
-3%
1461
-53%
2911
-6%
Read Seq Q32T1
2871
3461
21%
2364
-18%
3519
23%
AS SSD
-27%
-80%
-13%
Seq Read
2383
2960
24%
2082
-13%
2873
21%
Seq Write
2466
2586
5%
825
-67%
1619
-34%
4K Read
44.14
46.84
6%
42.41
-4%
57.5
30%
4K Write
117.5
96.1
-18%
98.3
-16%
149.6
27%
4K-64 Read
1734
854
-51%
1255
-28%
1252
-28%
4K-64 Write
2088
2015
-3%
738
-65%
2196
5%
Access Time Read *
0.049
0.048
2%
0.109
-122%
0.04
18%
Access Time Write *
0.032
0.094
-194%
0.17
-431%
0.082
-156%
Score Read
2017
1197
-41%
1506
-25%
1597
-21%
Score Write
2452
2370
-3%
918
-63%
2508
2%
Score Total
5503
4170
-24%
3136
-43%
4869
-12%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -14%
-51% / -55%
-5% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2871 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3094 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 557 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 395 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2247 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2983 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 49 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 157.3 MB/s

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

与之相反的是 GeForce RTX 3050(Ti),由于其微薄的视频存储只有4GB,并没有提供任何特别的保证和对未来的感觉。 GeForce RTX 3060对于注重价格的游戏玩家来说是一个不错的选择。Nvidia安培一代的DirectX 12型号至少有6GB的GDDR6 VRAM,目前还是足够的。

然而,与CPU性能类似,与竞争对手相比,Victus 16的GPU性能也大多低于平均值。这并不奇怪,因为惠普只为RTX 3060配置了95瓦的TGP(包括动态提升)。理论上,高达130瓦是可能的,例如联想用Legion 5显示。在合成图形基准测试和游戏运行中,那台笔记本电脑往往比惠普的设备领先10%以上。

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)
40487 Points +61%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
29164 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
27898 Points +11%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
26881 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (13799 - 30772, n=43)
26816 Points +7%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
25142 Points
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)
29457 Points +57%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21806 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21111 Points +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (16354 - 23109, n=49)
20436 Points +9%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
20312 Points +8%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
18806 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)
12066 Points +62%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8844 Points +19%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8295 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6285 - 9235, n=49)
8057 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7677 Points +3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7450 Points
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=155, last 2 years)
7720 Points +76%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4852 Points +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4795 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (3724 - 5399, n=25)
4791 Points +9%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4394 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
22166 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
45994 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17711 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7680 points
Help

游戏性能

尽管TGP相对较低,但Victus在现代游戏中占有一席之地。除了"孤岛危机重制版"以外,所有测试的游戏都能以60帧以上的速度运行,即使是在最大细节设置下。即使是要求极高、对VRAM要求很高的游戏也是如此,比如最近推出的 "死神"。死神"。."

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=167, last 2 years)
220 fps +63%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (81 - 186.8, n=41)
144.8 fps +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
143.9 (136min - 155max) fps +7%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
142 fps +5%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
135 (114min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=227, last 2 years)
117.1 fps +65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (58.2 - 91.5, n=48)
76.9 fps +8%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
75.6 (64min) fps +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
75.3 (73min - 79max) fps +6%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
70.9 (60min) fps

除了一些较小的FPS波动外,用" "进行的恒定负载测试。的测试。Witcher 3"显示没有任何异常。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
HP Victus 16-e0179ng R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø70 (64-73)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø73.6 (66-77)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø69.6 (65-77)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 150 86.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 135 70.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 149 134 128 121
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 74.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 98.9 87.2 72.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 109 102
Strange Brigade (2018) 146 128
Hunt Showdown (2020) 93.3
Doom Eternal (2020) 149 145
Crysis Remastered (2020) 60.7 43.4
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 86.1
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) 178 166
FIFA 21 (2020) 194 185
Outriders (2021) 100 85.3
Resident Evil Village (2021) 129 113
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) 109
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021) 143
Deathloop (2021) 72.3 63.5

排放

噪声排放

在空闲运行期间,16英寸笔记本电脑在噪音水平方面取得了良好的数据。在很长一段时间内,风扇保持关闭,这导致了完全无声的操作。然而,在负载情况下,和平与安静就会结束。44-52 dB(A)代表了一个明显的噪音水平,对一些用户来说可能会感到很烦人,建议使用耳机。在"TheWitcher 3"期间,Victus 16的噪音几乎达到50 dB(A),比Alienware m15 R5和华硕TUF F15更明显,但仍比联想Legion 5的噪音小。

Noise Level

Idle
24 / 25 / 34 dB(A)
Load
44 / 52 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.438.233.934.836.72539.634.332.130.633.83145.844.942.141.244.24035.731.528.927.631.15039.427.428.322.130.76334.934.330.823.946.98028.83023.719.345.210027.423.220.522.431.11252924.419.416.332.316029.127.317.615.932.920031.325.319.820.235.525031.426.61616.336.231532.133.714.614.93840032.82413.412.538.150031.723.713.212.338.363036.423.512.511.839.980032.82312.712.540.2100033.623.91313.440.6125035.524.112.912.942.5160032.420.612.911.540.4200030.519.31311.539.4250030.719.112.51239.6315030.721.912.61240.2400031.318.713.112.340500031.616.212.912.539.7630029.614.913.212.740.7800026.514.913.412.839100002313.61312.637.31250020.512.812.712.2341600020.617.614.311.730.6SPL443425.324.752N4.920.70.68.9median 31.3median 23median 13.1median 12.5median 39Delta2.43.41.11.93hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Victus 16-e0179ng
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-8%
1%
10%
-1%
off / environment *
24
24.2
-1%
24
-0%
24.8
-3%
Idle Minimum *
24
29
-21%
24
-0%
24.6
-3%
Idle Average *
25
29
-16%
25
-0%
24.9
-0%
Idle Maximum *
34
29
15%
35
-3%
24.9
27%
Load Average *
44
53.5
-22%
44
-0%
27.1
38%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
53.5
-7%
48
4%
46.4
7%
Load Maximum *
52
53.5
-3%
50
4%
49
6%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在空闲运行时,温度的发展已经变得相当高。根据我们的测量,底座顶部的中央区域和背面的温度达到40°C(104°F)以上。在3D操作过程中,机箱的温度甚至超过了50°C(122°F),这说明在游戏过程中把设备放在腿上是不可取的。不过,掌托始终保持着合理的温度。

组件也出了不少汗。CPU和GPU分别在82和70℃(180和158°F)完成了60分钟的Witcher 3 测试。在压力测试(FurMark + Prime95)中,Ryzen 7 5800H的温度更高,接近90°C(194°F)。另一方面,GeForce RTX 3060的温度几乎没有增加。

Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
Max. Load
 43 °C51 °C41 °C 
 41 °C51 °C43 °C 
 28 °C33 °C39 °C 
Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 41.1 °C
51 °C52 °C47 °C
50 °C51 °C46 °C
38 °C40 °C36 °C
Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 45.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
25%
1%
25%
17%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
42.6
16%
62
-22%
46.4
9%
Maximum Bottom *
52
52.2
-0%
61
-17%
45.4
13%
Idle Upper Side *
46
24.9
46%
36
22%
26
43%
Idle Bottom *
41
25.3
38%
33
20%
27.4
33%

* ... smaller is better

演讲者

我们的音频分析证明,Victus 16的声音在该领域中属于中等水平。根据目前的测量,所有竞争设备中,40%的设备提供了更好的声音,54%的设备提供了更差的声音,6%的设备具有可比性。像往常一样,尤其是低音缺乏。例如,华硕TUF F15的竞争对手在这里领先。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.8332530.632.93141.240.44027.628.85022.129.86323.928.28019.32410022.422.212516.324.216015.933.820020.247.525016.358.131514.96040012.560.350012.362.163011.861.480012.560.7100013.462.7125012.963.7160011.561.6200011.560.92500126231501266.3400012.365.2500012.570.9630012.769800012.866.81000012.667.91250012.258.11600011.755SPL24.777.5N0.641.2median 12.5median 61.4Delta1.95.734443428.834.428.824.13224.120.624.520.622.32422.323.525.923.535.535.135.534.826.634.841.42541.449.917.549.952.617.152.655.91655.95815.95860.715.260.762.313.762.368.313.368.369.513.169.565.211.565.265.811.465.86111.96163.611.663.663.212.263.263.512.363.563.511.763.56711.76767.311.867.363.112.163.162.111.862.162.611.562.651.411.251.477.124.977.141.80.641.8median 62.6median 12.2median 62.65.22.35.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Victus 16-e0179ngAsus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Victus 16-e0179ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理

消耗功率

大多数时候,耗电量低于竞争对手。怠速运行时5至20瓦,负载时108至189瓦,表明电池寿命良好。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5 / 10 / 20 Watt
Load midlight 108 / 189 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-12%
-40%
-19%
-68%
Idle Minimum *
5
7.3
-46%
11
-120%
9.5
-90%
Idle Average *
10
10.5
-5%
14
-40%
12.1
-21%
Idle Maximum *
20
15.7
21%
25
-25%
22.5
-13%
Load Average *
108
108
-0%
123
-14%
99.5
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
145
175
-21%
176
-21%
157
-8%
Load Maximum *
189
228
-21%
226
-20%
173.5
8%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3

0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
HP Victus 16-e0179ng: Ø144.5 (134-156)

电池寿命

70Wh,惠普为Victus 16配备的电池容量既不大也不特别小。然而,竞争对手仍然达到了略高的80至90Wh的容量。由于适度的功耗和集成图形切换,在要求不高的任务中,这台16英寸笔记本电脑在远离充电器的情况下可以持续相当长的时间。在亮度降低到大约150cd/m²的情况下,近6个小时的网上冲浪,只有TUF F15的表现最好。华硕的竞争对手在这项测试中持续了近8小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
8h 31min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 54min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 16min
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
10%
10%
40%
7%
Reader / Idle
511
881
72%
660
29%
WiFi v1.3
354
290
-18%
306
-14%
473
34%
Load
76
105
38%
55
-28%
119
57%
H.264
259
525
Witcher 3 ultra
96

Pros

+ 合适的电池寿命
+ 有吸引力的设计
+ 良好的144-Hz显示屏

Cons

- 键盘布局需要一些时间来适应
- 连接不再是最新的了
- 负载下的高排放

判决书

惠普Victus 16。测试装置由德国惠普公司提供。
惠普Victus 16。测试装置由德国惠普公司提供。

如果你不考虑略高的噪音水平和3D操作中相当高的温度,惠普Victus 16-e0179ng是一个相对成功和平衡的游戏笔记本电脑。

这款16英寸笔记本电脑不仅提供了有趣的外壳设计,还提供了良好的输入设备和令人信服的144-Hz显示屏。结合了Ryzen 7 5800HGeForce RTX 3060还可以在高到最大的细节水平上流畅地运行当前所有的游戏--至少在原生全高清分辨率下是这样。

大多数买家也应该对提供的电池寿命感到满意。惠普可以在连接方面做一些改进。至少有一个USB 3.2 Gen2端口对Victus 16来说是好事。总的来说,这款16英寸笔记本电脑与价格相近的RTX 3060竞争对手处于同一水平。

那些在1000至1500欧元(约1172-1759美元)的价格范围内寻找强大的游戏笔记本电脑的人,几乎可以毫不犹豫地选择这个。

价格和可用性

惠普Victus 16的各种配置可在美国起价约800美元,从BestBuy售价约为920美元。

HP Victus 16-e0179ng - 09/28/2021 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis
77 / 98 → 78%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
63 / 80 → 78%
Weight
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Battery
68 / 95 → 72%
Display
87%
Games Performance
94%
Application Performance
95%
Temperature
77 / 95 → 81%
Noise
77 / 90 → 86%
Audio
71%
Camera
38 / 85 → 45%
Average
75%
84%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普Victus 16游戏笔记本电脑回顾。时尚外壳下的强大硬件
Florian Glaser, 2021-10- 1 (Update: 2021-10- 1)