Notebookcheck

戴尔XPS 15 9510酷睿i5笔记本电脑回顾。踩着刹车的基本款

性价比不高。 戴尔XPS 15仍然是为数不多的高端多媒体笔记本电脑之一,它还可以选择不提供专用显卡。因此,虽然那些只想寻找快速处理器的人应该真的在这里找到了合适的地方,但戴尔也不必要地限制了CPU的性能。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows XPS Tiger Lake

我们知道戴尔XPS 15多年来一直是高质量的多媒体笔记本电脑,通常还配备了专用显卡。然而,戴尔也总是提供一个带有纯处理器图形的模型,以防你真的不需要快速显卡。但是,由于你必须支付1599欧元(约合1862美元)来购买酷睿i5-11400H,配备8GB内存、512GB PCIe固态硬盘和哑光FHD面板(16:10),所以该设备仍然不实惠。

也有一些没有专用GPU的竞争对手,他们的价格往往明显更高。随着新的 华为MateBook 16我们目前正在测试,已经有另一个竞争者开始了。关于机箱、输入设备和扬声器的详细信息,我们建议你参考我们对i7机型的评论。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD (XPS 15 9510 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-11400H 6 x 2.7 - 4.5 GHz, 51 W PL2 / Short Burst, 38 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H45
Graphics adapter
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Core: 1450 MHz, Memory: 1200 MHz, 30.0.100.9864 DCH
Memory
8192 MB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel, 2 slots, max. 64 GB
Display
15.60 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 145 PPI, Sharp LQ156N1, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel WM590 (Tiger Lake PCH-H)
Storage
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, 512 GB 
, 410 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: UHS-II, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s (ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 345 x 230
Battery
56 Wh, 4650 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: quad speakers (8W), Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 90W USB-C PSU, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.787 kg, Power Supply: 377 g
Price
1600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.2 %
10/2021
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
i5-11400H, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
1.8 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1200
88.6 %
10/2021
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.4 kg16.7 mm14.20"2520x1680
86.4 %
10/2021
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.7 kg15.9 mm16.10"1920x1080
87.7 %
01/2021
Schenker Vision 15
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.7 kg15 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.5 %
09/2020
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
R5 4600H, Vega 6
1.7 kg16.9 mm16.10"1920x1080
86.8 %
07/2020
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630
1.8 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1200

案例和设备

这款箱子实际上与 高端版本的XPS 15 9510我们已经测试过了。然而,这一次我们测试的是黑色底座和银色盖子的型号。与前代机型的情况一样,黑色表面仍然很容易受到灰尘和指纹的影响。看一下内部,除了缺少专用的GPU外,你不会看到任何区别。冷却系统也是相同的,电池也有相同的尺寸,尽管容量明显较小,为56而不是86Wh。至少在重量上这一点变得很明显,因为没有触摸屏的XPS 15的入门级型号要轻约200克(约7盎司)。

其余的设备与Thunderbolt 4连接,来自Killer的快速WLAN模块,以及SD读卡器与高端XPS 15 9510相同。

Size Comparison

369 mm 234 mm 16.9 mm 1.7 kg367.8 mm 236.1 mm 15.9 mm 1.7 kg355 mm 230 mm 15 mm 1.7 kg345 mm 230 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg345 mm 230 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg314 mm 230 mm 16.7 mm 1.4 kg

连接设备

左边:安全锁插槽,2个USB-C与Thunderbolt 4(DisplayPort,Power Delivery)。
左边:安全锁插槽,2个USB-C与Thunderbolt 4(DisplayPort,Power Delivery)。
右边。USB-C 3.2 Gen.2,SD读卡器,3.5毫米音频
右边。USB-C 3.2 Gen.2,SD读卡器,3.5毫米音频
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204.4 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
  (AV Pro V60)
201 MB/s ∼98%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.1 - 226, n=64, last 2 years)
79.7 MB/s ∼39% -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
  (AV Pro V60)
206 MB/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
199.2 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23.2 - 217, n=62, last 2 years)
86.2 MB/s ∼42% -58%
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1434 (1394min - 1508max) MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1400 (1216min - 1530max) MBit/s ∼98% +3%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1358 (1248min - 1479max) MBit/s ∼95%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1126 (552min - 1223max) MBit/s ∼79% -17%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1049 (253min - 1334max) MBit/s ∼73% -23%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
  (356 - 1368, n=15)
978 MBit/s ∼68% -28%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
646 (548min - 695max) MBit/s ∼45% -52%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1546 (816min - 1632max) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1542 (1327min - 1601max) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1314 (1233min - 1359max) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
  (640 - 1546, n=15)
1314 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1306 (653min - 1347max) MBit/s ∼84% -16%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1281 (1079min - 1478max) MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
671 (639min - 690max) MBit/s ∼43% -57%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1518 (816-1632)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1358 (1248-1479)
ColorChecker
17.6 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
18 ∆E
18 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD: 10.82 ∆E min: 1.53 - max: 18.63 ∆E

显示屏 - 一个16:10格式的哑光1080p显示屏

我们已经知道夏普的哑光全高清面板,分辨率为1920 x 1200像素,来自旧的 XPS 15 9500.该面板的平均亮度超过600cd/m²,继续成为市场上最亮的面板之一。 黑值相对较低,导致了超过2000:1的极高对比度。

主观的图像印象非常好,即使是明亮的区域也不会出现非常多的颗粒。前代产品在这方面的问题略多(见子像素图像的比较)。没有PWM闪烁,尽管亮度很高,但屏幕出血也不是一个问题。我们只注意到在顶部边缘有一个最小的明亮区域。在实践中,亮度可以通过自动亮度传感器舒适地控制。IPS面板的可视角度稳定性非常好。有问题的是缓慢的反应时间,在实践中也会导致明显的重影。

子像素网格
子像素网格
顶端边缘的屏幕出血量极少
顶端边缘的屏幕出血量极少
良好的可视角度稳定性
良好的可视角度稳定性
573
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
628
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
593
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Sharp LQ156N1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 632 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 606.1 cd/m² Minimum: 38.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 634 cd/m²
Contrast: 2179:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 2
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
79.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Sharp LQ156N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.60
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
CSOTT3 U17B MNE208ZA1-3, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.20
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Chi Mei CMN160B, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
N161HCA-EA3, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Sharp LQ156N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.60
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
SDC414D, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60
Schenker Vision 15
BOE08F5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
-10%
-10%
-20%
1%
16%
-10%
Display P3 Coverage
80.9
67.8
-16%
66.63
-18%
67.5
-17%
81.53
1%
99.9
23%
69.3
-14%
sRGB Coverage
100
98.3
-2%
99.54
0%
69.74
-30%
100
0%
100
0%
93.97
-6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
79.1
70.1
-11%
68.53
-13%
69.74
-12%
79.64
1%
98.1
24%
70.8
-10%
Response Times
42%
49%
37%
30%
94%
2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
62.4 ?(31.6, 30.8)
37.6 ?(18.8, 18.8)
40%
32 ?(15, 17)
49%
37.6 ?(18.8, 18.8)
40%
42 ?(20, 22)
33%
3.6 ?(2, 1.6)
94%
60 ?(29.2, 30.8)
4%
Response Time Black / White *
38.8 ?(20.8, 18)
21.6 ?(10.8, 10.8)
44%
20 ?(11, 9)
48%
25.6 ?(14, 11.6)
34%
28.8 ?(15.2, 13.6)
26%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
93%
39 ?(19.2, 18.8)
-1%
PWM Frequency
27780 ?(40)
2500 ?(10)
25250 ?(30)
59.52 ?(99)
Screen
14%
9%
24%
-8%
34%
-8%
Brightness middle
632
419
-34%
304
-52%
337
-47%
592
-6%
362
-43%
478
-24%
Brightness
606
407
-33%
284
-53%
312
-49%
565
-7%
367
-39%
462
-24%
Brightness Distribution
91
93
2%
88
-3%
89
-2%
85
-7%
97
7%
94
3%
Black Level *
0.29
0.23
21%
0.165
43%
0.2
31%
0.46
-59%
0.06
79%
0.27
7%
Contrast
2179
1822
-16%
1842
-15%
1685
-23%
1287
-41%
6033
177%
1770
-19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.5
1.9
46%
1.44
59%
0.8
77%
3.19
9%
2.1
40%
3.2
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.4
3.6
44%
3.62
43%
1.1
83%
5.45
15%
4.1
36%
8.4
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2
0.9
55%
0.7
65%
2.03
-2%
2.5
-25%
2
-0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5
2.9
42%
2.6
48%
1
80%
3.9
22%
1.4
72%
4.5
10%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.14 103%
2.41 91%
2.2 100%
2.25 98%
2.18 101%
2.16 102%
CCT
7033 92%
6733 97%
6527 100%
6538 99%
6522 100%
6608 98%
6788 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68.5
63.8
71.6
63.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5
99.5
100
93.6
Total Average (Program / Settings)
15% / 13%
16% / 10%
14% / 16%
8% / -1%
48% / 38%
-5% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.8 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
62.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31.6 ms rise
↘ 30.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20848 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在交付状态下,面板没有被校准得特别好,而且在色温过低的情况下,有轻微的绿色色调。我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2色度计进行的分析也显示出颜色偏差略高。 通过我们的校准(在上面的信息框中可免费下载配置文件),我们能够特别改善灰度的再现,也能消除颜色的色调。与sRGB参考色彩空间(完全由面板覆盖)的色彩偏差也有所减少。只有两种颜色(100%的红色和蓝色)仍然最低限度地高于3的重要目标值,然而,该面板仍然适用于图像处理。

由于其高亮度,该显示器在户外完全处于其元素。如果你避免光源的直接反射,你也可以在非常明亮的环境中毫无问题地使用XPS 15。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN灰度(已校准
CalMAN灰度(已校准
CalMAN饱和度(已校准
CalMAN饱和度(已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker(已校准)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(已校准)。
在阳光下(有反射
在阳光下(有反射
在阳光下(无反射
在阳光下(无反射
在阳光下(无反射
在阳光下(无反射

性能 -Tiger Lake H,6个核心

入门级型号主要适用于那些寻找大型多媒体笔记本电脑而不想用它来玩游戏的用户。戴尔为它配备了当前的英特尔Tiger Lake-H处理器,通常以45瓦的TDP运行。由于冷却方式与高端型号相同,这其实不应该造成任何问题。然而,戴尔仍然决定在只有约40瓦的情况下运行处理器,这一点我们无法解释。 8GB的工作内存数量也是偏小的。虽然你可以利用两个SODIMM插槽轻松升级,但由于戴尔使用了两个4GB的模块,你必须支付更多的钱来更换为16GB,例如。

预装的戴尔电源管理器还提供了激活超性能模式的选项,但我们一会儿就会看到为什么这没有什么效果。下面的基准测试和测量是在标准的优化设置下进行的。

处理器 - 酷睿i5-11400H

芯片酷睿i5-11400H是一个六核处理器,能够在单核上达到4.5 GHz的最高速度,在所有内核上达到4.1 GHz。在开始时,该处理器接近50瓦的大关,但随后很快就平缓到40瓦以下(或在超性能模式下为40瓦)。由于强大的冷却功能,我们本以为它能够发挥酷睿i5-11400H的全部潜力。

与旧的 酷睿i5-10300H(四核)在XPS 15 9500的性能优势约为30%,但新的六核处理器几乎没有比 酷睿i7-11370H四核处理器的速度。 MateBook 14s.新的华为MateBook 16也令人印象深刻地展示了目前AMD的45瓦Ryzen处理器的可能性(在54瓦的多重测试中平均快70%)。虽然性能当然完全可以满足日常任务,但这里显然有一些浪费的潜力。

在电池运行时,TDP降低到只有15瓦,导致CPU性能在多核测试中下降约50%(579分@CB R15 Multi)。你可以在我们的 技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01052103154205256307358409451050115512601365147015751680178518901995Tooltip
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD Intel Core i5-11400H; Ultra-Performance: Ø1187 (1131.35-1276.65)
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD Intel Core i5-11400H: Ø1121 (1099.29-1142.47)
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø1038 (1027.19-1054.52)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø926 (914.45-1017.58)
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) AMD Ryzen 5 4600H: Ø1361 (1342.69-1420)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H; Ultra Performance: Ø1663 (1589.38-2024.19)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1625 (1566.05-2009.95)
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1995 (1980.49-2009.14)
Schenker Vision 15 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø968 (957.88-1027.12)
Cinebench R15多循环CPU数据(红色:超性能,绿色:优化)。
Cinebench R15多循环CPU数据(红色:超性能,绿色:优化)。
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
10531 Points ∼100% +55%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (6674 - 9406, n=5)
8165 Points ∼78% +20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3121 - 13205, n=74, last 2 years)
7370 Points ∼70% +8%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
6806 Points ∼65%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
6612 Points ∼63% -3%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
6182 Points ∼59% -9%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4805 Points ∼46% -29%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1556 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1518 Points ∼98% +13%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1498 Points ∼96% +11%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (1349 - 1472, n=4)
1412 Points ∼91% +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (980 - 1586, n=69, last 2 years)
1353 Points ∼87% 0%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
1349 Points ∼87%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1303 Points ∼84% -3%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
3848 Points ∼100% +42%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3234 Points ∼84% +19%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (2550 - 3740, n=5)
3154 Points ∼82% +17%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
2707 Points ∼70%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
2578 Points ∼67% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (727 - 5128, n=99, last 2 years)
2491 Points ∼65% -8%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
2299 Points ∼60% -15%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
2107 Points ∼55% -22%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1999 Points ∼52% -26%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
601 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
590 Points ∼98% +5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points ∼97% +4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
560 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (522 - 569, n=4)
555 Points ∼92% -1%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
539 Points ∼90% -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (311 - 621, n=99, last 2 years)
498 Points ∼83% -11%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
452 Points ∼75% -19%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
446 Points ∼74% -20%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2024.19 Points ∼100% +59%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2009.95 Points ∼99% +57%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1420 (1342.69min - 1420max) Points ∼70% +11%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (1014 - 1532, n=5)
1297 Points ∼64% +2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
1277 (1131min - 1277max) Points ∼63%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
1142 (1099.29min - 1142.47max) Points ∼56% -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (334 - 2154, n=114, last 2 years)
1129 Points ∼56% -12%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1055 (1027.19min - 1054.52max) Points ∼52% -17%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1027 (957.88min - 1027.12max) Points ∼51% -20%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1018 (914.45min - 1017.58max) Points ∼50% -20%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
889 (827.87min - 893.75max) Points ∼44% -30%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
233 Points ∼100% +11%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
232 Points ∼100% +10%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
228 Points ∼98% +9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points ∼98% +9%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (202 - 219, n=4)
212 Points ∼91% +1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
210 Points ∼90%
Average of class Multimedia
  (126 - 244, n=97, last 2 years)
196 Points ∼84% -7%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
186 Points ∼80% -11%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
176 Points ∼76% -16%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (183 - 1439, n=94, last 2 years)
519 Seconds * ∼100% -22%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
518 Seconds * ∼100% -22%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
508 Seconds * ∼98% -19%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
507 Seconds * ∼98% -19%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
461 Seconds * ∼89% -8%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
426 Seconds * ∼82%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (340 - 483, n=4)
401 Seconds * ∼77% +6%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
356 Seconds * ∼69% +16%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
298 Seconds * ∼57% +30%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
42570 MIPS ∼100% +32%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
38185 MIPS ∼90% +18%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (30457 - 40268, n=4)
35321 MIPS ∼83% +10%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
32228 MIPS ∼76%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8984 - 59653, n=92, last 2 years)
29899 MIPS ∼70% -7%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
28520 MIPS ∼67% -12%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
27015 MIPS ∼63% -16%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
26819 MIPS ∼63% -17%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
24388 MIPS ∼57% -24%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
5427 MIPS ∼100% +7%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
5393 MIPS ∼99% +6%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
5352 MIPS ∼99% +5%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5099 MIPS ∼94% 0%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
5089 MIPS ∼94%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (4802 - 5158, n=4)
5047 MIPS ∼93% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3289 - 5865, n=92, last 2 years)
4946 MIPS ∼91% -3%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
4889 MIPS ∼90% -4%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4334 MIPS ∼80% -15%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
8164 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (5534 - 7018, n=5)
6446 Points ∼79% +8%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
6115 Points ∼75% +3%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
6080 Points ∼74% +2%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
5985 Points ∼73% +1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
5954 Points ∼73%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1604 - 12708, n=95, last 2 years)
5933 Points ∼73% 0%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5878 Points ∼72% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
4399 Points ∼54% -26%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
1607 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1588 Points ∼99% +6%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1586 Points ∼99% +6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1540 Points ∼96% +3%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
1500 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (1411 - 1528, n=5)
1496 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (813 - 1782, n=95, last 2 years)
1368 Points ∼85% -9%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
1183 Points ∼74% -21%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1117 Points ∼70% -26%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.4 fps ∼100% +37%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.79 fps ∼79% +8%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (8.19 - 11.3, n=4)
9.79 fps ∼79% +8%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
9.06 fps ∼73%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
8.51 fps ∼69% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.39 - 15.9, n=92, last 2 years)
8.16 fps ∼66% -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
7.7 fps ∼62% -15%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
7.58 fps ∼61% -16%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.28 fps ∼59% -20%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
63.6 s * ∼100% -36%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
62.5 s * ∼98% -34%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30.2 - 99.2, n=92, last 2 years)
54.9 s * ∼86% -18%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * ∼75% -2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
46.6 s * ∼73%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.8 s * ∼72% +2%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
43.8 s * ∼69% +6%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (41.4 - 46.6, n=4)
43.7 s * ∼69% +6%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
41.1 s * ∼65% +12%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.646 sec * ∼100% -10%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.627 sec * ∼97% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.4851 - 1.002, n=94, last 2 years)
0.618 sec * ∼96% -5%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (0.582 - 0.644, n=4)
0.6 sec * ∼93% -2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H
0.589 sec * ∼91%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.571 sec * ∼88% +3%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.567 sec * ∼88% +4%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.549 sec * ∼85% +7%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.548 sec * ∼85% +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
36972
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
8611
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
12011
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.45 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
13.31 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
43.57 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1277 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
210 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
49.1 fps
Help

系统性能

与Windows 11兼容
与Windows 11兼容

由于CPU/iGPU的组合相对较弱,XPS 15 9510只能勉强排在老款XPS 15的前面。 旧的XPS 15在合成的PCMark 10基准测试中,仅在比较组的最后一位。然而,在日常工作中,这一点并不明显,XPS 15只是一台反应非常快的电脑,这当然也是由于快速的PCIe SSD。XPS 15 9510兼容Windows 11。

PCMark 10 / Score
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6019 Points ∼100% +34%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
5459 Points ∼91% +21%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5419 Points ∼90% +20%
Schenker Vision 15
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5158 Points ∼86% +15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3028 - 6919, n=85, last 2 years)
5069 Points ∼84% +13%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5001 Points ∼83% +11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), i5-11400H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4502 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
 
4502 Points ∼75% 0%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
4329 Points ∼72% -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
10531 Points ∼100% +11%
Schenker Vision 15
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10522 Points ∼100% +11%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
10241 Points ∼97% +8%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
9874 Points ∼94% +4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9490 Points ∼90% 0%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), i5-11400H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9463 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
 
9463 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6441 - 10846, n=85, last 2 years)
9216 Points ∼88% -3%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
8888 Points ∼84% -6%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
8344 Points ∼100% +29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5448 - 9729, n=85, last 2 years)
7498 Points ∼90% +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
7388 Points ∼89% +14%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
7209 Points ∼86% +11%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
7082 Points ∼85% +10%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
6996 Points ∼84% +8%
Schenker Vision 15
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6852 Points ∼82% +6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), i5-11400H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6466 Points ∼77%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
 
6466 Points ∼77% 0%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7475 Points ∼100% +85%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
5838 Points ∼78% +44%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5790 Points ∼77% +43%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5299 Points ∼71% +31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2148 - 9735, n=85, last 2 years)
5254 Points ∼70% +30%
Schenker Vision 15
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5165 Points ∼69% +28%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), i5-11400H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
4047 Points ∼54%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
 
4047 Points ∼54% 0%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
3187 Points ∼43% -21%
PCMark 10 Score
4502 points
Help

DPC延迟

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker Vision 15
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7445.5 μs * ∼100% -657%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1913.9 μs * ∼26% -94%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1521.2 μs * ∼20% -55%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1297.1 μs * ∼17% -32%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), i5-11400H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
984.2 μs * ∼13%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
576.9 μs * ∼8% +41%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
435.4 μs * ∼6% +56%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

我们的测试装置配备了来自美光的快速PCIe 3.0固态硬盘,它提供了512GB的存储容量(首次打开后有411GB可用)。由于有第二个M.2 2280插槽,如果有必要,存储容量可以很容易地扩展。你可以找到更多的固态硬盘基准测试 这里.

Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Schenker Vision 15
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Average Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
28%
-2%
-6%
-30%
-2%
88%
-1%
-4%
Write 4K
110.28
209.43
90%
171.8
56%
156.91
42%
93.29
-15%
109.35
-1%
238.1
116%
106 ?(86 - 125, n=5)
-4%
144 ?(52.1 - 263, n=78, last 2 years)
31%
Read 4K
57.1
56.76
-1%
79.43
39%
48.81
-15%
45.9
-20%
53.91
-6%
79.21
39%
51.2 ?(40.1 - 57.1, n=5)
-10%
52.2 ?(27.7 - 148, n=78, last 2 years)
-9%
Write Seq
1958.15
1099
-44%
1050.26
-46%
1211
-38%
1990.54
2%
4138.8
111%
2041 ?(1738 - 2706, n=5)
4%
1708 ?(214 - 4139, n=73, last 2 years)
-13%
Read Seq
1781.09
1847
4%
2517.03
41%
1633
-8%
1759.22
-1%
4132.9
132%
1845 ?(1553 - 2298, n=5)
4%
1833 ?(498 - 4133, n=73, last 2 years)
3%
Write 4K Q32T1
495.69
606.34
22%
539.3
9%
408.73
-18%
273.1
-45%
499.78
1%
696.88
41%
494 ?(455 - 521, n=5)
0%
434 ?(158 - 697, n=78, last 2 years)
-12%
Read 4K Q32T1
474.35
792.35
67%
555
17%
504.03
6%
356
-25%
438.81
-7%
757.59
60%
445 ?(358 - 570, n=5)
-6%
474 ?(220 - 767, n=78, last 2 years)
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
2838.5
2321.7
-18%
1095
-61%
1087.4
-62%
1198
-58%
2834.8
0%
5187.1
83%
2867 ?(2784 - 2999, n=5)
1%
2138 ?(211 - 5187, n=78, last 2 years)
-25%
Read Seq Q32T1
3243.4
3511.3
8%
1988
-39%
3407.3
5%
2269
-30%
3234.8
0%
7117
119%
3272 ?(3204 - 3461, n=5)
1%
2954 ?(390 - 7117, n=78, last 2 years)
-9%
Write 4K Q8T8
1572.88
907 ?(250 - 1986, n=8, last 2 years)
Read 4K Q8T8
1201.59
1413 ?(587 - 2626, n=8, last 2 years)
AS SSD
46%
11%
74%
-55%
-8%
135%
10%
18%
Seq Read
2602
2961
14%
2015.22
-23%
2749
6%
1423.43
-45%
1362
-48%
5427.2
109%
2300 ?(1362 - 2960, n=6)
-12%
2256 ?(341 - 5529, n=83, last 2 years)
-13%
Seq Write
976
2098
115%
1054.87
8%
2348
141%
766.19
-21%
1440
48%
3886.1
298%
1550 ?(976 - 2586, n=6)
59%
1571 ?(134 - 4218, n=83, last 2 years)
61%
4K Read
42.99
52.96
23%
73.89
72%
44.22
3%
42.21
-2%
38.43
-11%
72.89
70%
45 ?(38.4 - 49.8, n=6)
5%
48.6 ?(21.2 - 75.2, n=83, last 2 years)
13%
4K Write
127.08
186.94
47%
223.24
76%
140.48
11%
74.83
-41%
121.41
-4%
219.34
73%
107 ?(85.5 - 127, n=6)
-16%
136 ?(48.3 - 261, n=83, last 2 years)
7%
4K-64 Read
383.28
1130.65
195%
589.37
54%
1449.71
278%
972.67
154%
370.5
-3%
2208.94
476%
676 ?(371 - 855, n=6)
76%
1057 ?(155 - 2757, n=83, last 2 years)
176%
4K-64 Write
1345.93
1502.18
12%
1029.11
-24%
2345.58
74%
218.8
-84%
1053.65
-22%
2265.2
68%
1616 ?(1054 - 2015, n=6)
20%
1228 ?(56.6 - 3056, n=83, last 2 years)
-9%
Access Time Read *
0.037
0.029
22%
0.056
-51%
0.079
-114%
0.125
-238%
0.042
-14%
0.033
11%
0.059 ?(0.037 - 0.103, n=6)
-59%
0.0692 ?(0.032 - 0.153, n=80, last 2 years)
-87%
Access Time Write *
0.117
0.026
78%
0.039
67%
0.027
77%
0.552
-372%
0.135
-15%
0.02
83%
0.1807 ?(0.094 - 0.365, n=6)
-54%
0.1202 ?(0.017 - 1.075, n=83, last 2 years)
-3%
Score Read
687
1480
115%
865
26%
1769
157%
1157
68%
545
-21%
2825
311%
952 ?(545 - 1197, n=6)
39%
1332 ?(223 - 3361, n=83, last 2 years)
94%
Score Write
1571
1899
21%
1358
-14%
2721
73%
370
-76%
1319
-16%
2873
83%
1877 ?(1319 - 2370, n=6)
19%
1521 ?(136 - 3402, n=83, last 2 years)
-3%
Score Total
2541
4102
61%
2644
4%
5376
112%
2094
-18%
2160
-15%
7069
178%
3290 ?(2160 - 4170, n=6)
29%
3508 ?(490 - 7397, n=83, last 2 years)
38%
Copy ISO MB/s
1073.58
1511.55
41%
1186.15
10%
1150.59
7%
1405.65
31%
2775.26
159%
1603 ?(1074 - 2064, n=5)
49%
1628 ?(116 - 2903, n=69, last 2 years)
52%
Copy Program MB/s
874
376.25
-57%
782.2
-11%
499.35
-43%
843.6
-3%
662.41
-24%
843 ?(613 - 1012, n=5)
-4%
562 ?(44.5 - 995, n=69, last 2 years)
-36%
Copy Game MB/s
1805.33
1114.74
-38%
1028.44
-43%
732.94
-59%
1353.42
-25%
1655
-8%
1570 ?(1353 - 1805, n=5)
-13%
1113 ?(74 - 1844, n=69, last 2 years)
-38%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
37% / 41%
5% / 6%
34% / 41%
-43% / -46%
-5% / -6%
112% / 118%
5% / 6%
7% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3243.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2838.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 474.35 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 495.69 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1781.09 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1958.15 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 110.28 MB/s

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

GPU-ZUHD Graphics Xe 16 EUs
GPU-ZUHD Graphics Xe 16 EUs

i5-11400H和其他Tiger Lake H45 CPU之间最大的区别是集成GPU,因为只有一个瘦身的UHD Graphics Xe图形芯片,有16个EU(酷睿i7-11800H:32EUs, 酷睿i7-11370H:96EUs).因此,纯粹的图形性能只达到了旧的 XPS 15 9500UHD Graphics 630,尽管已经使用了双通道内存。新的iGPU的唯一优势是改进了Tiger Lake 代的视频解码器,在4K视频复制过程中大大降低了GPU的负载(约30%,而旧的UHD Graphics 630为60%)。

在这种配置下,XPS 15几乎不适合游戏,许多游戏即使在最小的细节设置下也不能流畅地运行。那些仍然想玩游戏的人应该集中在Windows商店的简单游戏上。

图形性能在恒定负载下,以及在电池运行期间保持稳定。你可以找到更多的基准测试 这里.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
15387 Points ∼100% +816%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1365 - 33732, n=82, last 2 years)
9901 Points ∼64% +490%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
6994 Points ∼45% +317%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6971 Points ∼45% +315%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
6904 Points ∼45% +311%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4589 Points ∼30% +173%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, Intel Core i5-10300H
1744 Points ∼11% +4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i5-11400H
1679 Points ∼11%
Average Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
 
1679 Points ∼11% 0%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
12119 Points ∼100% +786%
Average of class Multimedia
  (920 - 25285, n=90, last 2 years)
7135 Points ∼59% +422%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
5771 Points ∼48% +322%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5759 Points ∼48% +321%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
5327 Points ∼44% +289%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3051 Points ∼25% +123%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i5-11400H
1368 Points ∼11%
Average Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
 
1368 Points ∼11% 0%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, Intel Core i5-10300H
1189 Points ∼10% -13%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
48479 Points ∼100% +379%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
33402 Points ∼69% +230%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6498 - 87836, n=68, last 2 years)
33114 Points ∼68% +227%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
26752 Points ∼55% +164%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i5-11400H
10124 Points ∼21%
Average Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
 
10124 Points ∼21% 0%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, Intel Core i5-10300H
9873 Points ∼20% -2%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
4591 Points ∼100% +1131%
Average of class Multimedia
  (300 - 9323, n=81, last 2 years)
2526 Points ∼55% +577%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
1717 Points ∼37% +360%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
1688 Points ∼37% +353%
Schenker Vision 15
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1611 Points ∼35% +332%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
903 Points ∼20% +142%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, Intel Core i5-10300H
382 Points ∼8% +2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), Intel Core i5-11400H
373 Points ∼8%
Average Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
 
373 Points ∼8% 0%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
12803 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
7609 points
3DMark 11 Performance
1979 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
57212 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
10288 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1298 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
433 points
Help
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 62.8 50 9.2 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 27 17 9 5 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 108 57 23.1 21.5 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 14.6 6.87 4.79 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 18.4 16.8 15.4 fps
Strange Brigade (2018) 31 12 11 7 fps
F1 2020 (2020) 26 12 fps
F1 2021 (2021) 34 fps

Emissions and Power

噪声排放

低性能的优势在于安静的风扇,在日常操作中(上网、视频流),你几乎听不到。即使在满负荷的情况下,也需要几分钟时间才能达到近38dB(A)的最高水平。我们没有注意到任何其他电子噪音,如线圈啸叫。

Noise Level

Idle
24.4 / 24.4 / 24.4 dB(A)
Load
26.1 / 37.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.4 dB(A)
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), i5-11400H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Schenker Vision 15
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Noise
-8%
-11%
-14%
-13%
-6%
-25%
off / environment *
24.4
24.3
-0%
26
-7%
29.7
-22%
28
-15%
23.8
2%
29.8
-22%
Idle Minimum *
24.4
24.3
-0%
26
-7%
29.7
-22%
28
-15%
23.8
2%
29.8
-22%
Idle Average *
24.4
24.3
-0%
26
-7%
29.7
-22%
28
-15%
23.8
2%
29.8
-22%
Idle Maximum *
24.4
28.4
-16%
27.7
-14%
30.5
-25%
28
-15%
23.8
2%
31.1
-27%
Load Average *
26.1
31.7
-21%
32.7
-25%
31
-19%
28
-7%
36
-38%
40.5
-55%
Witcher 3 ultra *
33.2
31.7
5%
31.3
6%
36
-8%
40.5
-22%
Load Maximum *
37.7
46.8
-24%
39
-3%
36.7
3%
41.9
-11%
38.2
-1%
40.5
-7%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.937.634.632.634.937.92528.331.53230.527.528.33122.429.528.924.623.722.44025.330.130.926.428.325.35025.530.732.424.726.825.56326.727.328.523.725.326.78021.623.92423.721.521.610019.92123.617.519.219.912517.822.622.51922.317.816014.820.218.817.32014.820017.919.822.820.921.917.925017.220.423.821.422.517.231514.818.323.420.420.314.84001416.723.420.919.71450011.91524.620.919.611.963014.516.624.921.119.914.580011.315.125.923.120.911.3100011.313.825.620.720.511.3125010.91427.421.920.710.9160011.613.326.622.120.611.6200011.713.12722.32211.7250011.312.62924.423.411.3315011.612.727.322.421.311.6400012.112.826.221.720.412.1500012.412.823.117.115.712.4630012.513.118.214.814.412.5800012.813.214.8131312.81000012.71313.612.812.812.71250012.312.61412.712.712.31600011.812.112.212.11211.8SPL24.426.137.733.232.224.4N0.60.82.61.71.60.6median 12.4median 13.8median 23.6median 20.9median 20.3median 12.4Delta1.42.23.22.72.31.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD

温度

在任何情况下,表面温度都没有让人担心的理由,即使在负载下,你也可以把电脑放在腿上。在压力测试期间,性能甚至进一步降低,其水平仅为34瓦(CPU:~2 GHz,iGPU:~1.3 GHz),这又是非常少的。

压力测试期间的CPU和iGPU数据
压力测试期间的CPU和iGPU数据
Max. Load
 41.9 °C42.8 °C37.6 °C 
 40.6 °C42.3 °C37.1 °C 
 31.5 °C29.8 °C28.3 °C 
Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 36.9 °C
38.1 °C41.2 °C39.6 °C
34.6 °C37.8 °C35.4 °C
31.5 °C33.3 °C32.3 °C
Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 36 °C
Power Supply (max.)  44.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.5 °C / 88.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
应力测试表面温度(顶部
应力测试表面温度(顶部
应力测试表面温度(底)。
应力测试表面温度(底)。

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.3322527.426.43133.135.84032.537502633.96320.744.68019.453.810023.761.312518.563.416016.765.520017.568.325017.269.131513.169.240011.670.850010.772.363011.171.580011.571.7100010.873.3125010.781.3160010.783.120001178.625001174.8315011.475.4400011.869.350001274.3630012.273.7800012.472.11000012.369.21250012.365.61600011.556.3SPL23.888.8N0.577.6median 11.8median 71.5Delta1.92.730.528.230.542.832.242.831.231.931.225.627.825.624.828.624.821.92421.920.222.620.225.518.325.532.618.432.63716.93743.21643.255.214.255.25913.75964.61364.660.212.560.261.712.461.768.612.668.669.512.469.567.512.767.568.512.968.568.513.768.567.613.767.668.41468.467.914.167.973.214.473.272.714.572.775.215.175.274.91574.972157264.513.564.582.325.982.353.50.753.5median 67.6median 14median 67.66.616.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHDAcer Swift 3 SF316-51
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Acer Swift 3 SF316-51 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

消耗功率

考虑到大型和非常明亮的显示屏,XPS 15的空载消耗非常低。顺便说一下,基本型号交付的是一个较弱的90瓦电源(USB-C),而高端XPS 15包括一个130瓦的电源。然而,由于压力测试期间的最大消耗只有76瓦,然后迅速平息在57瓦,因此90瓦的电源完全足够。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.34 / 0.9 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.3 / 9 / 9.7 Watt
Load midlight 30.3 / 76.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø30.6 (28.9-41.1)
; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø59.5 (54.8-76.2)

电池寿命

高效的FHD面板在电池寿命方面也变得很明显,尽管电池较小,但实际上在我们的WLAN测试中,电池寿命可能达到6.5至7.5小时(取决于亮度;150cd/m² @24%)。然而,这里也有一些潜力被浪费了,因为如果使用更大的86瓦时电池,这里可能会有10-11小时。尽管i5 XPS仍然领先于其 OLED兄弟姐妹但它最终在我们的比较组中排名最后。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
Schenker Vision 15
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 73 Wh
912 min ∼100% +105%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
R5 4600H, Vega 6, 56 Wh
619 min ∼68% +39%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh
618 min ∼68% +39%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh
585 min ∼64% +31%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630, 56 Wh
556 min ∼61% +25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (220 - 1016, n=87, last 2 years)
542 min ∼59% +22%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
i5-11400H, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), 56 Wh
445 min ∼49%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
420 min ∼46% -6%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
Schenker Vision 15
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 73 Wh
662 min ∼100% +75%
Acer Swift 3 SF316-51
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh
468 min ∼71% +24%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
R5 4600H, Vega 6, 56 Wh
452 min ∼68% +20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (244 - 662, n=29, last 2 years)
431 min ∼65% +14%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh
410 min ∼62% +8%
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
i5-11400H, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), 56 Wh
378 min ∼57%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
343 min ∼52% -9%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 94)
7h 25min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 94)
6h 18min

Pros

+ 高品质外壳
+ 哑光和非常明亮的IPS显示屏
+ 2个M.2插槽和2个SODIMM
+ 快速的SD读卡器
+ 安静的冷却
+ 非常好的扬声器...

Cons

- ...但在某些情况下会发出响声
- 涡轮增压使用不当
- 图形性能与前代产品持平
- 只有1年的保修期

结论 - 带有Core i5和iGPU的XPS 15 9510太贵了

测试戴尔XPS 15 9510。测试装置由cyberport提供。
测试戴尔XPS 15 9510。测试装置由cyberport提供。

原则上,提供高品质多媒体笔记本电脑而不配备专用显卡的概念肯定是有道理的,因为不是每个人都还想用笔记本电脑玩游戏。然而,新的XPS 15 9510在这方面似乎没有考虑周全,所使用的i5-11400H并不适合。众所周知,戴尔在XPS 15上不使用AMD的CPU,但如果使用酷睿i7-11370H会更好。尽管少了两个CPU核心,但在日常运行中CPU的性能并没有明显下降,但集成的GPU明显更快。

总的来说,测试装置的实际性能非常令人失望。尽管有与高端型号相同的冷却装置,但几秒钟后TDP已经被限制在40瓦。图形性能与老款相比也没有提高 XPS 15 9500 iGPU.但至少XPS 15在日常操作中几乎一直保持沉默,即使在负载下,风扇也非常安静。虽然这在日常操作中可能是积极的,但至少在可选的超性能模式下,我们希望能有最大的CPU性能,即使那时风扇的声音更大。

新的XPS 15 9510的iGPU模式对于所提供的性能来说简直太昂贵了。对于那些对没有专用GPU的XPS 15感兴趣的人,我们推荐旧的XPS 15 9500,它仍然可以从戴尔那里以1250欧元(约1456美元)的价格买到,而且速度几乎没有任何下降。

哑光全高清显示屏仍然非常明亮,因此非常适用于在户外使用。耗电量也保持在限制范围内,但不幸的是,戴尔在其入门级机型中也使用了较小的电池,这意味着电池寿命也不是特别好。这里肯定有一些潜力被浪费了。总的来说, 申克尔Vision 15是一个更好的选择,也有许多多媒体笔记本电脑具有更好的性价比,如 Honor MagicBook Pro,以及Acer Swift 3 16,还有 华为MateBook 14s其伟大的3:2显示屏。此外,还推出了另一个竞争者,即 MateBook 16这款产品由于采用了Ryzen 7-5800H处理器,性能显著提高。 Ryzen 7-5800H处理器.但是,如果它绝对必须是XPS 15与明亮的FHD面板,我们推荐的是 XPS 15 9500前身,它为日常任务提供的CPU性能几乎没有减少,并继续从戴尔获得1250欧元(约1456美元)的价格。

价格和可用性

我们的测试配置可从戴尔公司购买,价格约为1300美元。,也有许多其他配置可供选择。例如,配备酷睿i7-11800H、专用GeForce RTX 3050、16GB内存、哑光FHD面板和较大电池的机型价格约为$1900.

Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD - 10/20/2021 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
90 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard
85%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
63 / 80 → 78%
Weight
66 / 20-72 → 88%
Battery
76 / 95 → 80%
Display
88%
Games Performance
52 / 90 → 57%
Application Performance
90 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
90%
Noise
97 / 95 → 100%
Audio
76%
Camera
27 / 85 → 32%
Average
77%
84%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Mark Riege
Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 282 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18419 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 戴尔XPS 15 9510酷睿i5笔记本电脑回顾。踩着刹车的基本款
Andreas Osthoff, 2021-10-23 (Update: 2021-10-23)