Notebookcheck

MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG (i7-9750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by Zewei Shen), 07/29/2019
Gaming Geforce MSI Laptop / Notebook Coffee Lake

献给那些需要性能的创作者们。 微星给了新GS65更强的CPU和GPU,更高的刷新率和更大的触摸板,使得使用更舒适。然而,20000多元的售价,我们的期望可不低。

MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG (GS65 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 835 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 430.86, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
,
Soundcard
NVIDIA TU104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm earphones
Networking
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 358 x 248
Battery
82 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p30
Additional features
Speakers: 两个扬声器, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, MSI Dragon Center, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.971 kg, Power Supply: 865 g
Price
2500 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

362 mm 265 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg363 mm 275 mm 21 mm 2.2 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 2 kg360 mm 268 mm 15.75 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.2 kg
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: 1x USB 3.1 Gen 2, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, Mini DisplayPort 1.2, HDMI 2.0, AC adapter
Right: 1x USB 3.1 Gen 2, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, Mini DisplayPort 1.2, HDMI 2.0, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.1 Gen 2, 3.5 mm gold-plated headphones, 3.5 mm gold-plated microphone
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.1 Gen 2, 3.5 mm gold-plated headphones, 3.5 mm gold-plated microphone
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
688 MBit/s ∼99% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
661 MBit/s ∼95% 0%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 MBit/s ∼95%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
596 MBit/s ∼86% -10%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
718 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼94% +9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
644 MBit/s ∼90% +4%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
620 MBit/s ∼86%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
588 MBit/s ∼82% -5%
255.9
cd/m²
285.9
cd/m²
260.2
cd/m²
261.8
cd/m²
282.3
cd/m²
259.8
cd/m²
272.3
cd/m²
272.9
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 285.9 cd/m² Average: 268.8 cd/m² Minimum: 14.97 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 282.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 882:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.17 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.06
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 63.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
7%
-24%
35%
-1%
-18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13.6 (8, 5.6)
12.8 (6.8, 6)
6%
18.8 (11.6, 7.2)
-38%
7 (3.6, 3.4)
49%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-12%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
-29%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (7.6, 4.4)
10.4 (6, 4.4)
13%
13.2 (8, 5.2)
-10%
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
20%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
7%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-7%
PWM Frequency
23260 (19)
23810 (10)
2%
23580 (24)
1%
Screen
-10%
-53%
-44%
-36%
-19%
Brightness middle
282.3
293
4%
320.4
13%
323.6
15%
266
-6%
254
-10%
Brightness
269
270
0%
298
11%
315
17%
248
-8%
262
-3%
Brightness Distribution
90
87
-3%
85
-6%
91
1%
89
-1%
89
-1%
Black Level *
0.32
0.29
9%
0.42
-31%
0.29
9%
0.31
3%
0.22
31%
Contrast
882
1010
15%
763
-13%
1116
27%
858
-3%
1155
31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.17
1.69
-44%
3.21
-174%
3.31
-183%
2.78
-138%
2.37
-103%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.29
3.37
-2%
5.54
-68%
5.74
-74%
5.96
-81%
4.71
-43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.06
1.24
-17%
2.36
-123%
2.73
-158%
0.91
14%
1.84
-74%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.3
2.3
-77%
3.6
-177%
2.9
-123%
3.58
-175%
1.58
-22%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.3 96%
2.27 97%
2.29 96%
2.46 89%
2.48 89%
CCT
6643 98%
6758 96%
6503 100%
6765 96%
7186 90%
6785 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.8
63
-1%
59
-8%
59.7
-6%
62
-3%
60
-6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.5
98.5
1%
92
-6%
91.8
-6%
96
-2%
92
-6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / -7%
-39% / -48%
-5% / -32%
-19% / -29%
-19% / -19%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 5.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 23260 Hz ≤ 19 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 23260 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 19 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 23260 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13573 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190Tooltip
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1110 (975.73-1185.01)
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø991 (974.33-1083.86)
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points ∼94% +18%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼87% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=67)
183 Points ∼84% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼81% +2%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼80% +1%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points ∼80%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
Intel Core i5-8300H
171 Points ∼78% -2%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
Intel Core i7-8550U
154 Points ∼71% -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
150 Points ∼69% -14%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
144 Points ∼66% -17%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points ∼66% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼39% +53%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points ∼31% +22%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼27% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (964 - 1306, n=69)
1182 Points ∼27% +5%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
1126 Points ∼26%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
Intel Core i7-8750H
1011 Points ∼23% -10%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
Intel Core i5-8300H
805 Points ∼18% -29%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points ∼18% -29%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points ∼17% -35%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
661 Points ∼15% -41%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA
Intel Core i7-8550U
497 Points ∼11% -56%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.33 Points ∼95%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
2.11 Points ∼86%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1.96 - 2.19, n=7)
2.09 Points ∼85%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.73 Points ∼70%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
1.71 Points ∼70%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1.64 Points ∼67%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
18.94 Points ∼43%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.05 Points ∼34%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (11.3 - 14.1, n=7)
12.8 Points ∼29%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9.21 Points ∼21%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.08 Points ∼18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
7.53 Points ∼17%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6967 Points ∼64%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (6659 - 7214, n=11)
6895 Points ∼64%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5528 Points ∼51%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4770 Points ∼44%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
42456 Points ∼65%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28251 - 36304, n=11)
33203 Points ∼51%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21839 Points ∼33%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
20687 Points ∼32%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
Intel Core i5-8300H
278.469 s * ∼3%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
212.96 s * ∼3%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
197.075 s * ∼2%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
118.733 s * ∼1%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (0.3 - 11365, n=39)
2593 Seconds * ∼12%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
649.703 Seconds * ∼3%
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
550.75 Seconds * ∼2%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
Intel Core i5-8300H
545.627 Seconds * ∼2%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
476.493 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1126 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
107.77 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
8163 Points ∼63% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (6675 - 8862, n=8)
7514 Points ∼58% +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7236 Points ∼56% +2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7090 Points ∼55%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6888 Points ∼53% -3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6775 Points ∼52% -4%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
6272 Points ∼48% -12%
Productivity
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8200 Points ∼79% +7%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
7793 Points ∼75% +2%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7750 Points ∼74% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7695 Points ∼74% 0%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7657 Points ∼73%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (7180 - 8200, n=8)
7626 Points ∼73% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7351 Points ∼71% -4%
Essentials
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9486 Points ∼83% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
9472 Points ∼83% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (8791 - 9927, n=8)
9422 Points ∼82% 0%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9380 Points ∼82%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9109 Points ∼80% -3%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
8875 Points ∼77% -5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6838 Points ∼60% -27%
Score
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5941 Points ∼73% +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5839 Points ∼72% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (5374 - 6202, n=8)
5832 Points ∼72% +2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5725 Points ∼71%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼70% 0%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5426 Points ∼67% -5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5095 Points ∼63% -11%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6035 Points ∼92% +5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5852 Points ∼89% +2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5751 Points ∼87%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5749 Points ∼87% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (4755 - 6593, n=8)
5731 Points ∼87% 0%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5621 Points ∼85% -2%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5407 Points ∼82% -6%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5115 Points ∼84% +15%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4851 Points ∼80% +9%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4665 Points ∼77% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (4207 - 5319, n=8)
4486 Points ∼74% +1%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4454 Points ∼73%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4418 Points ∼73% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4380 Points ∼72% -2%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4454 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5751 points
Help
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
AS SSD
-5%
-23%
-42%
-6%
-21%
Copy Game MB/s
1554.28
976.6
-37%
1164.53
-25%
811.76
-48%
1140.57
-27%
Copy Program MB/s
712.72
496.53
-30%
478.19
-33%
702.66
-1%
454.24
-36%
Copy ISO MB/s
3024.87
2082.66
-31%
1872.47
-38%
1236.22
-59%
2085.95
-31%
Score Total
4230
4221
0%
3230
-24%
1654
-61%
4122
-3%
2870
-32%
Score Write
1991
2102
6%
1752
-12%
910
-54%
2051
3%
1141
-43%
Score Read
1490
1394
-6%
985
-34%
492
-67%
1346
-10%
1186
-20%
Access Time Write *
0.036
0.034
6%
0.043
-19%
0.047
-31%
0.035
3%
0.065
-81%
Access Time Read *
0.054
0.05
7%
0.077
-43%
0.073
-35%
0.073
-35%
0.042
22%
4K-64 Write
1729.71
1807.21
4%
1500.92
-13%
721.96
-58%
1760.16
2%
921.88
-47%
4K-64 Read
1240.56
1159.06
-7%
756.72
-39%
322.05
-74%
1170.26
-6%
875.61
-29%
4K Write
103.79
108.34
4%
88.05
-15%
95.65
-8%
107.15
3%
126.51
22%
4K Read
49.33
52.08
6%
33.2
-33%
45.74
-7%
48.94
-1%
59.11
20%
Seq Write
1579.5
1864.07
18%
1629.24
3%
920.07
-42%
1834.04
16%
923.81
-42%
Seq Read
2004.98
1832.18
-9%
1952.51
-3%
1238.57
-38%
1266.1
-37%
2516.94
26%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3395 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1922 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 417.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 308.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2051 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1915 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 40.73 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 91.32 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
5538 Points ∼60% +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (3698 - 5295, n=17)
4506 Points ∼49% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
4495 Points ∼49% +5%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
4275 Points ∼46%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
3958 Points ∼43% -7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
3679 Points ∼40% -14%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
3168 Points ∼34% -26%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
11294 Points ∼77% +55%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
9754 Points ∼66% +34%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
8171 Points ∼56% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (6464 - 8844, n=17)
7887 Points ∼54% +9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
7277 Points ∼50% 0%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
7266 Points ∼49%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
6728 Points ∼46% -7%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
6606 Points ∼45% -9%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
6007 Points ∼41% -17%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
5689 Points ∼39% -22%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
4548 Points ∼31% -37%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
27620 Points ∼68% +46%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
24623 Points ∼61% +30%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
21237 Points ∼52% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (18048 - 23032, n=17)
20661 Points ∼51% +9%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
20307 Points ∼50% +7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
19123 Points ∼47% +1%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
18962 Points ∼47%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
18153 Points ∼45% -4%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
17792 Points ∼44% -6%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
15501 Points ∼38% -18%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
14780 Points ∼36% -22%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
14394 Points ∼35% -24%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
11814 Points ∼29% -38%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U
6262 Points ∼15% -67%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
16523 Points ∼73% +30%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
13644 Points ∼60% +7%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
12732 Points ∼56%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
11561 Points ∼51% -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (9212 - 12785, n=18)
11503 Points ∼51% -10%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
11288 Points ∼50% -11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
10866 Points ∼48% -15%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
10749 Points ∼48% -16%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
10663 Points ∼47% -16%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
10475 Points ∼46% -18%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
10020 Points ∼44% -21%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
9981 Points ∼44% -22%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
7573 Points ∼33% -41%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U
5792 Points ∼26% -55%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), 2700X
37989 Points ∼75% +52%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
34050 Points ∼67% +37%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
28997 Points ∼57% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (23386 - 30910, n=18)
27812 Points ∼55% +12%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
27109 Points ∼53% +9%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
24926 Points ∼49%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
24267 Points ∼48% -3%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
23414 Points ∼46% -6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
22723 Points ∼45% -9%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
20464 Points ∼40% -18%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
18687 Points ∼37% -25%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
18205 Points ∼36% -27%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
14879 Points ∼29% -40%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U
8451 Points ∼17% -66%
3DMark 11 Performance
20209 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
37220 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16598 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7099 points
Help
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
109 (min: 94, max: 120) fps ∼100% +63%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
95.3 fps ∼87% +42%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
80.3 fps ∼74% +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (65.7 - 92.7, n=18)
78.1 fps ∼72% +17%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼64% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
68.9 fps ∼63% +3%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
66.9 fps ∼61%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
65 fps ∼60% -3%
Alienware 17 R5
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
60.8 fps ∼56% -9%
Aorus 15 W9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
58 fps ∼53% -13%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
52.7 fps ∼48% -21%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
40 fps ∼37% -40%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
20.6 fps ∼19% -69%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
110 fps ∼100% +31%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
109 fps ∼99% +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (71 - 105, n=7)
84.9 fps ∼77% +1%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
84 fps ∼76%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
74.2 fps ∼67% -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
23 fps ∼21% -73%
01020304050607080Tooltip
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø67.7 (62-73)
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 306.4 273 254.1 156.9 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 279 216 125.5 66.9 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 223.3 176.7 139.8 108.6 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 133 102 97 84 fps
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
Noise
7%
-0%
-8%
-12%
-4%
off / environment *
28.3
28.3
-0%
30
-6%
28.7
-1%
30
-6%
28.2
-0%
Idle Minimum *
30.4
28.8
5%
30
1%
29.8
2%
31
-2%
30.4
-0%
Idle Average *
30.5
28.8
6%
31
-2%
32.4
-6%
34
-11%
30.4
-0%
Idle Maximum *
30.6
29
5%
34
-11%
38
-24%
39
-27%
33.4
-9%
Load Average *
37.6
33.5
11%
43
-14%
38.2
-2%
46
-22%
37.1
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46
45
2%
42
9%
56.6
-23%
53
-15%
54.2
-18%
Load Maximum *
55.1
45.2
18%
44
20%
56.6
-3%
55
-0%
56.4
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
30.4 / 30.5 / 30.6 dB(A)
Load
37.6 / 55.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28.3 dB(A)
Max. Load
 38 °C45.6 °C38.6 °C 
 37.4 °C44.6 °C37.8 °C 
 28.8 °C25.2 °C28.6 °C 
Maximum: 45.6 °C
Average: 36.1 °C
34.4 °C53.8 °C31.2 °C
36.2 °C47.6 °C32.6 °C
27.2 °C31 °C27.4 °C
Maximum: 53.8 °C
Average: 35.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  45.6 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.8 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.2 °C / -0.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.243.82539.440.63138.838.94038.338.15036.636.56338.236.78036.636.510034.238.612533.342.316033.447.420032.951.325031.456.231531.460.240030.361.950029.967.463029.372.180028.779.8100028.379.4125028.280.616002881.1200028.380.4250027.874.1315027.974.3400027.673.2500027.268.6630027.173.4800026.880.51000026.7721250026.767.11600026.660.2SPL40.389.4N3.979.6median 28.3median 72Delta1.87.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GS65 Stealth 9SGApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.38 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 1.47 / 1.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 18.3 / 22 / 28.8 Watt
Load midlight 93 / 215.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Aorus 15 W9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GE75 9SG
9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
14%
27%
-2%
7%
-10%
Idle Minimum *
18.3
12.5
32%
7
62%
22.9
-25%
18
2%
13.9
24%
Idle Average *
22
15.3
30%
11
50%
27.2
-24%
20
9%
18.8
15%
Idle Maximum *
28.8
20.7
28%
20
31%
27.5
5%
28
3%
23.1
20%
Load Average *
93
90.2
3%
98
-5%
83.4
10%
87
6%
112.3
-21%
Load Maximum *
215.9
209.3
3%
182
16%
160.5
26%
175
19%
291.5
-35%
Witcher 3 ultra *
142.6
162
-14%
132
7%
143.6
-1%
135
5%
231
-62%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 02min
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 90 Wh
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh
Battery Runtime
9%
-54%
28%
0%
-50%
Reader / Idle
953
235
627
507
WiFi v1.3
362
393
9%
166
-54%
463
28%
362
0%
181
-50%
Load
102
46
103
81

Pros

+ 正常的网络摄像头位置
+ 超丝滑的240 Hz面板
+ 可观的续航时间
+ 小巧轻便
+ 单键RGB照明
+ 超宽触控板
+ 扬声器
+ 雷电3

Cons

- RTX 2080 Max-Q和RTX 2070 Max-Q之间的差异仅为8%
- 保修需要撕开贴纸
- M.2和RAM可维护性低
- 接口位置不太好
- 游戏时不够安静
- 低音表现差
- 机身刚性差
- 没有SD卡读卡器
- 充电慢
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG笔记本电脑评测. Test model provided by Xotic PC
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG笔记本电脑评测. Test model provided by Xotic PC

如果您想获得GS65的最佳游戏体验,那么毫无疑问,带有RTX 2080 Max-Q的240 Hz型号是最强的。我们过去对GS65赞扬和批评的一切仍然适用于2019年的最新版本,包括轻量化设计,难以维护,可靠的续航时间和平庸的机身刚性。

然而,为了获得最佳性价比,240 Hz屏幕和RTX 2080 Max-Q GPU的组合可能不是最佳选择。标配的144 Hz面板和240 Hz面板之间的差异很难被感觉到,而RTX 2080 Max-Q仅比RTX 2070 Max-Q性能强快8%。使用144 Hz,RTX 2070 Max-Q和i7-8750H SKU可以节省近900美元,而不会牺牲太多游戏性能。

RTX 2080 Max-Q比RTX 2070 Max-Q强了不到10%,而且它们之间的差价约为500美元。如果您想从GS65系列获得最强的GPU性能,那么这是一个很高的代价。

MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG - 09/20/2019 v7
Allen Ngo

Chassis
68 / 98 → 69%
Keyboard
77%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
60 / 80 → 75%
Weight
63 / 10-66 → 95%
Battery
69 / 95 → 73%
Display
89%
Games Performance
94%
Application Performance
91%
Temperature
84 / 95 → 89%
Noise
78 / 90 → 87%
Audio
74%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Average
75%
84%