Alienware外星人m15（i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q）笔记本电脑评测
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q (m15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 1215 MHz, Memory: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 398.89, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB
, DDR4-2666, 1333.3 MHz, PC4-21300, 19-19-19-43, 双通道
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, AUO80ED, Dell P/N: K055G, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 512 GB
Soundcard
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo
Networking
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21 x 363 x 275
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD网络摄像头
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘，背光，AlienFX, Keyboard Light: yes, AlienwareFX, Mobile Connect, Command Center, OnScreen Display, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.16 kg, Power Supply: 720 g
Price
24999元 ~ 1900 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B156HAN
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 366.2 cd/m² Average: 346 cd/m² Minimum: 44.15 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 353.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1179:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.55 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6, calibrated: 3.37
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
88.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 2018 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Alienware 15 R4 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD0540), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 2% | -105% | -3% | 38% | 7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 18 (9.2, 8.8) | 17.2 (8.8, 8.4) 4% | 37.6 (18.8, 18.8) -109% | 17.6 (9.2, 8.4) 2% | 7.4 (3.8, 3.6) 59% | 16.8 (8.4, 8.4) 7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12 (6.8, 5.2) | 12 (6.8, 5.2) -0% | 24 (13.2, 10.8) -100% | 12.8 (7.6, 5.2) -7% | 10 (4.4, 5.6) 17% | 11.2 (6, 5.2) 7% |
| PWM Frequency | 20830 (99) | |||||
| Screen | 10% | -7% | 16% | 13% | 18% | |
| Brightness middle | 353.6 | 290 -18% | 292 -17% | 254 -28% | 294 -17% | 313 -11% |
| Brightness | 346 | 281 -19% | 278 -20% | 262 -24% | 275 -21% | 300 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 82 -5% | 88 2% | 89 3% | 84 -2% | 78 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.3 -0% | 0.29 3% | 0.22 27% | 0.24 20% | 0.33 -10% |
| Contrast | 1179 | 967 -18% | 1007 -15% | 1155 -2% | 1225 4% | 948 -20% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.55 | 2.85 37% | 4.9 -8% | 2.37 48% | 2.57 44% | 1.29 72% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 7.91 | 6.27 21% | 10.08 -27% | 4.71 40% | 4.88 38% | 2.04 74% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 3.37 | 1.39 59% | 2.27 33% | 1.84 45% | 2.14 36% | |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 4.1 | 2.4 41% | 4.89 -19% | 1.58 61% | 2.41 41% | 0.69 83% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.34 94% | 2.36 93% | 2.48 89% | 2.5 88% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 7434 87% | 6718 97% | 7598 86% | 6785 96% | 6370 102% | 6550 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57.9 | 60 4% | 56 -3% | 60 4% | 59 2% | 60 4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 88.9 | 94 6% | 86 -3% | 92 3% | 91 2% | 94 6% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
9% | -56% /
-22% | 7% /
13% | 26% /
17% | 13% /
16% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9704 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured. | |||
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1164 (1146.3-1213.67)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø988 (977.49-1049.42)
Lenovo Legion Y7000P-1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1097 (1069.15-1211.83)
Razer Blade 15 Base Model GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø864 (856.88-926.63)
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=86) | |
| Dell G3 15 3579 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1050Ti | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (863 - 1251, n=93) | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| Dell G3 15 3579 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1050Ti | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (1.89 - 2, n=40) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (9.54 - 13.5, n=41) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (29664 - 35307, n=25) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (6236 - 6645, n=25) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (125 - 181, n=6) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 | |
| Digital Content Creation | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (5793 - 7303, n=9) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
| Productivity | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (7032 - 7793, n=9) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
| Essentials | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (6838 - 9270, n=9) | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
| Score | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (4910 - 5728, n=9) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (5323 - 5818, n=10) | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (4393 - 5130, n=10) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4418 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5407 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5426 points | |
Help | ||
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Razer Blade 15 2018 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Alienware 15 R4 Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 42% | -24% | 0% | 21% | -0% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 706.3 | |||||
| Copy Program MB/s | 431.54 | |||||
| Copy ISO MB/s | 642.49 | |||||
| Score Total | 2667 | 3806 43% | 1416 -47% | 2039 -24% | 3294 24% | 2536 -5% |
| Score Write | 862 | 1450 68% | 435 -50% | 802 -7% | 1515 76% | 939 9% |
| Score Read | 1221 | 1584 30% | 714 -42% | 815 -33% | 1161 -5% | 1092 -11% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.063 | 0.038 40% | 0.053 16% | 0.045 29% | 0.036 43% | 0.046 27% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.116 | 0.051 56% | 0.116 -0% | 0.071 39% | 0.129 -11% | 0.119 -3% |
| 4K-64 Write | 655.5 | 1203.91 84% | 310.53 -53% | 570.49 -13% | 1285.25 96% | 742.09 13% |
| 4K-64 Read | 995.38 | 1299.71 31% | 437.37 -56% | 610.88 -39% | 1030.22 4% | 847.34 -15% |
| 4K Write | 93.41 | 93.55 0% | 94.84 2% | 83.83 -10% | 103.63 11% | 80.44 -14% |
| 4K Read | 29.17 | 46.45 59% | 32.87 13% | 43.09 48% | 40.02 37% | 23.36 -20% |
| Seq Write | 1135.14 | 1520.94 34% | 300.41 -74% | 1474.76 30% | 1260.72 11% | 1163.11 2% |
| Seq Read | 1967 | 2375.98 21% | 2441.12 24% | 1612.2 -18% | 903.24 -54% | 2212.97 13% |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 49% | -10% | 49% | 36% | 36% | |
| Write 4K | 107.4 | 94.15 -12% | 96.85 -10% | 91.46 -15% | 98.17 -9% | 94.43 -12% |
| Read 4K | 42.91 | 39.23 -9% | 35.73 -17% | 40.41 -6% | 39.43 -8% | 37.65 -12% |
| Write Seq | 467.5 | 1483 217% | 362.3 -23% | 1528 227% | 1386 196% | 1335 186% |
| Read Seq | 2335 | 1371 -41% | 2110 -10% | 1235 -47% | 1100 -53% | 1404 -40% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 289.7 | 296.2 2% | 318.6 10% | 259 -11% | 270.3 -7% | 268.6 -7% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 354.4 | 342.5 -3% | 366.7 3% | 364.9 3% | 340.3 -4% | 332.8 -6% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 460.9 | 1527 231% | 351 -24% | 1529 232% | 1454 215% | 1375 198% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3111 | 3280 5% | 2813 -10% | 3472 12% | 1681 -46% | 2627 -16% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 46% /
45% | -17% /
-18% | 25% /
21% | 29% /
27% | 18% /
15% |
* ... smaller is better
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3111 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
460.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
354.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
289.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2335 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
467.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
42.91 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
107.4 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (7458 - 12069, n=18) | |
| Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng | |
| Dell G3 15 3579 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1050Ti | |
| HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q | |
| Alienware 15 R4 | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (17680 - 20829, n=18) | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1050Ti | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng | |
| Dell G3 15 3579 | |
| HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 17408 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35886 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14119 points | |
Help | ||
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G: Ø52 (49-56)
| low | med. | high | ultra | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 291.6 | 247.6 | 242.8 | 136.8 | fps |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 254 | 173.9 | 101.6 | 54.2 | fps |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 217.5 | 166 | 102.8 | 85.1 | fps |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Alienware 15 R4 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -19% | 1% | -14% | -10% | |
| off / environment * | 28.6 | 29 -1% | 29 -1% | 28.4 1% | 29 -1% | 29 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.6 | 29 -1% | 32 -12% | 28.4 1% | 33 -15% | 30 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 28.6 | 30 -5% | 33 -15% | 28.4 1% | 34 -19% | 31 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.6 | 38 -33% | 50 -75% | 29.6 -3% | 40 -40% | 35 -22% |
| Load Average * | 40.8 | 46 -13% | 50 -23% | 43.5 -7% | 47 -15% | 49 -20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.6 | 49 1% | 51 -3% | 45.7 8% | 51 -3% | 51 -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 49.6 | 46 7% | 51 -3% | 45.7 8% | 53 -7% | 54 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 28.6 / 28.6 / 28.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40.8 / 49.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 39.9 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.6 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 39.9 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.6 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.097 / 0.15 Watt |
| Idle | 7.6 / 13.8 / 14.6 Watt |
| Load |
97.6 / 172.5 Watt |
   
| |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Alienware 15 R4 i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, LiteOn CX2-8B256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -25% | -77% | 1% | -52% | -71% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.6 | 14 -84% | 23 -203% | 8.7 -14% | 17 -124% | 22 -189% |
| Idle Average * | 13.8 | 17 -23% | 26 -88% | 13 6% | 20 -45% | 26 -88% |
| Idle Maximum * | 14.6 | 21 -44% | 30 -105% | 14.3 2% | 29 -99% | 33 -126% |
| Load Average * | 97.6 | 95 3% | 111 -14% | 107.4 -10% | 112 -15% | 86 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 145.8 | 141 3% | 182 -25% | 129 12% | 152 -4% | 159 -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 172.5 | 179 -4% | 222 -29% | 151.5 12% | 211 -22% | 215 -25% |
* ... smaller is better
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Alienware 15 R4 i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 82 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -33% | -40% | -26% | -64% | 28% | |
| Reader / Idle | 627 | 382 -39% | 370 -41% | 213 -66% | 762 22% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 463 | 322 -30% | 304 -34% | 372 -20% | 157 -66% | 513 11% |
| Load | 103 | 72 -30% | 58 -44% | 70 -32% | 42 -59% | 156 51% |
Pros
+ 续航很长；有60Wh和90Wh电池可选
+ 2个或是3个存储槽；支持傲腾
+ 强劲的CPU睿频性能
+ 1080p 144Hz或4K UHD屏幕可选
+ 刚性对于这个尺寸而言很优秀
+ 外置显卡接口
+ 独立小键盘
+ 可维护性高
Cons
- 比轻薄游戏本竞品更重更厚
- 不如Alienware 15 R4坚固
- 类肤质表面易于沾染指纹
- 键程短于Alienware 15 R4
- 后置接口难以触及
- 上下边框较宽
- 外放效果一般
- 没有单键RGB
- 没有SD卡读卡器
- 没有GSync
Alienware笔记本电脑传统上会比竞争对手更大，更坚固，更丰富多彩。这使得Alienware m15可能成为一个非常具有挑战性的设计理念，因为它必须平衡所有上述因素，同时看起来像Razer Blade 15或MSI GS65一样轻薄。确实，新机身小于Alienware 15 R4，而在接口选择，RGB照明，铰链刚性，存储托架和电池容量都有小幅削减，但明显更轻的重量可能非常值得特殊用户群体。事实上，它甚至提供了一些更大的替代品所没有的功能，包括更长的续航时间和小键盘。
将Alienware m15和GS65，Blade 15，Aero 15x，Zephyrus GX531或Predator Triton 700相比较会更加公平。该设备比许多超薄替代品更厚更重，但它也比大多数更加坚固，具有更长的续航时间和更多的内部存储选项。最令人惊喜的可能是其卓越的CPU睿频时间，m15可以提供比其他配备i7-8750H处理器的轻薄本更强的CPU性能。
但有一些缺点阻止了m15成为超薄游戏本的佼佼者。除了稍微厚一些的外形，缺乏按键RGB照明之外，按键反馈，点击反馈，风扇噪音和扬声器质量都没有什么特别的。在外观方面，一些用户可能会被有光泽的边框，易于沾染指纹的掌托或难以触及的后接口劝退。尽管如此，任何考虑Alienware 15 R4或超其他超薄游戏本的用户都应该考虑一下Alienware m15，因为它提供了其竞品所没有的一些优势。
“Alienware m15是那些想要超薄设计而又不牺牲机身刚性的游戏玩家的心头好。考虑到其小巧的机身尺寸，其超长睿频时间和长续航在竞争中具有令人意想不到的优势。”
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q - 12/11/2018 v6(old)
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Weighted Average
