华硕VivoBook S15笔记本评测：iGPU提供性能提升

Name: Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W
Brand: Asus

卑微的集成显卡，有一拳之力。 即使没有专用的GPU，VivoBook S15也能提供与一些入门级游戏笔记本相媲美的性能。由于采用了OLED显示屏，它特别适合处理照片和视频编辑工作。这台机器在其他方面也能提供令人惊讶的性能。

Mario Petzold, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/24/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Laptop / Notebook Radeon Zen 3 (Vermeer) Windows

华硕VivoBook是一款入门级的多媒体笔记本电脑，由于其强大的处理器、色彩准确和高对比度的OLED显示屏以及高便携性，它的运行速度很快，甚至可以让你进行媒体制作工作。然而，它的机箱设计很朴素，其余的规格也相当一般。像 14英寸机型，VivoBook S15没有一个专用的显卡。

尽管如此，这不是一个问题，因为VivoBook S15配备了一个 AMD Ryzen 7 6800H的功能，其中包括AMD Radeon 680M集成显卡。在我们的测试中，这款笔记本与配备了Nvidia RTX 3050的竞争对手处于同一水平。 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050或英特尔A370M并因此可以为视频渲染等任务提供足够的性能。没有专用的GPU在其他方面也有优势。

此外，VivoBook S15可以配置更强大的AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX和一个能够在120Hz下运行的2.8K OLED显示屏。这两个选项都提供了一个高性能的选择，非常适合苛刻的视频编辑工作。

带有独立GPU的竞争性笔记本电脑，如 Acer Swift X SFX16和戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7620更为昂贵。继续阅读，了解这种差异在日常使用中是否明显。

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.7 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon 680M, RDNA 2

Memory

16 GB

, DDR5-4800

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Samsung SDC4161, OLED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G, 512 GB

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm combo audio jack

Networking

MediaTek MT7921 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18.8 x 359 x 233

Battery

70 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, MyASUS, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.89 kg, Power Supply: 390 g

Price

1200 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
83.2 %	02/2023	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M	1.9 kg	18.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
87.4 %	08/2022	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	18.99 mm	16.00"	3072x1920
86.4 %	12/2022	HP Omen 16-n0033dx R7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	2.4 kg	22.6 mm	16.10"	1920x1080
86.4 %	11/2022	Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX i7-1260P, A370M	1.8 kg	21.2 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
84.1 %	07/2022	Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.6 kg	17.9 mm	14.50"	2880x1800
80.8 %	09/2022	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 R5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	21.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

箱子 - 盖子上的小标签

机箱的大部分塑料设计只被金属盖子打破。VivoBook的盖子上有某种标签或徽章。它看起来很有趣，使该设备在视觉上从其竞争对手中脱颖而出，但不幸的是，它最终成为一个积聚灰尘的地方。

否则，相对较薄的机箱既没有任何独特的功能，也没有缺陷。尽管笔记本相当厚重，但机箱仍然是刚性的，只有在用一个角握住时才会有非常轻微的弯曲。它在处理时也不会发出任何声音。

显示器可以用一只手打开，摇晃得有点厉害。我们以为它会更结实，特别是考虑到盖子是由金属制成的。

像许多其他多媒体笔记本电脑一样，VivoBook S15也不是轻量级的。在近2公斤（4.4磅）的重量下，该设备让你马上知道它的引擎盖下有更多一点的动力。然而，S15仍然相当薄，只有不到19毫米（0.75英寸），因此可以轻松收起。

尺寸比较

HP Omen 16-n0033dx Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z DIN A4 ❌

规格 - 稀疏的端口选择

虽然端口的选择从根本上说是足够的，但我们不禁对它感到失望。左侧只有一个USB 2.0端口。这个接口极其有限的速度并没有困扰我们，因为你很可能只是要把鼠标或偶尔把打印机连接到这个端口。

右边的I/O端口对现代设备来说相当典型：有两个USB-C端口并排，这样当你用另一个端口充电时，至少有一个是可用的。除了支持Power Delivery，这两个端口都能输出DisplayPort信号。也就是说，它们的速度不是特别快，只能达到10Gbit/s的速度，如果你想把外部固态硬盘连接到笔记本上，就会有一些限制。但当涉及到访问数据时，这不应该影响性能。

一个HDMI 2.1输出，一个全尺寸的USB 3.0端口和一个组合音频插孔确保覆盖你的基本I/O需求。但你不会在VivoBook S15上找到任何读卡器、LAN端口或高速USB连接（例如，USB 3.2 Gen 2x2）。

在右边。组合音频插孔、USB 3.0（5 Gbit/s）、2个USB-C（10 Gbit/s、DisplayPort、Power Delivery）、HDMI 2.1

连接性

根据我们的测量，Wi-Fi模块的性能相当乏力。VivoBook S15的网络性能比多媒体笔记本平均能达到的性能低近三分之一，在极少数情况下，让我们希望笔记本有一个以太网端口。

也就是说，该模块的性能足以满足所有现代的使用情况，从流媒体视频和网页浏览到偶尔在本地网络中传输数据。如果你对性能不满意，你可以随时自己升级Wi-Fi模块。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1622 (1539^min - 1665^max) MBit/s +129%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1501 (1389^min - 1586^max) MBit/s +112%
Average of class Multimedia (701 - 1789, n=78, last 2 years)	1416 MBit/s +100%
Average MediaTek MT7921 (104.2 - 968, n=16)	800 MBit/s +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W MediaTek MT7921	709 (702^min - 714^max) MBit/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Realtek RTL8852BE	685 (646^min - 762^max) MBit/s -3%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1595 (1119^min - 1711^max) MBit/s +122%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1506 (1447^min - 1567^max) MBit/s +109%
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1735, n=76, last 2 years)	1327 MBit/s +84%
Average MediaTek MT7921 (47.8 - 985, n=16)	820 MBit/s +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Realtek RTL8852BE	740 (704^min - 785^max) MBit/s +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W MediaTek MT7921	720 (674^min - 765^max) MBit/s

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W MediaTek MT7921; iperf 3.1.3: Ø720 (674-765)

Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1595 (1119-1711)

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf 3.1.3: Ø740 (704-785)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头的低分辨率限制了图像质量。鉴于互联网带宽几乎总是高到足以支持全高清摄像头的事实，全高清摄像头本来是有意义的。此外，更高的分辨率对于拍摄快速照片或类似的东西也很有用。

除了无趣的720p分辨率外，网络摄像头完全做了它应该做的事。无论场景是有明亮的台灯还是黑暗的背景，所产生的照片总是相对较好的照明，而且人脸是可识别的。然而，该摄像头产生的图像有时也表现出相当大的色彩差异--就像许多笔记本电脑的网络摄像头一样。不过，对于视频通话来说，更重要的是能够轻松地分辨出相机所显示的内容。

双阵列的麦克风令人印象深刻。它能捕捉到声音，没有任何细微的痕迹，即使用户与笔记本的距离不同，也能保持音量恒定，而且可以从不同的方向使用而不损失质量。

ColorChecker Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W: 14.65 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 26.59 ∆E

维护

访问华硕VivoBook S15的内部结构是非常直接的。松开四颗短的和六颗长的Torx螺丝后，你可以从铰链处开始，不费吹灰之力就能拆下底板。正常的小心程度足以避免损坏任何塑料夹子。

一旦面板被卸下，清洁风扇和更换组件就非常容易了。特别是，如果你打算将笔记本电脑用于更苛刻的应用，M.2固态硬盘和Wi-Fi模块可能是升级的好人选。

内存也同样可以升级。但根据华硕的说法，我们的评测模型，配备了8GB的模块和8GB的板载内存，已经达到了支持的最大内存量。

有一个缺陷我们需要提及：我们的评测机上有一个铰链螺丝没有正确拧紧。在最坏的情况下，这个螺丝可能会随着时间的推移而松动，然后导致主板短路，但这当然不需要是这种情况。

输入设备--用VivoBook快速打字

带有数字键盘的成熟的键盘提供了一个整体的愉快的打字体验。输入很精确，几乎没有比大型桌面键盘慢的地方。如果我们真的要吹毛求疵，短的键程可能会困扰一些人。但一般来说，平坦的笔记本电脑键盘无论如何都可以使用更长的移动距离。

我们喜欢按键所提供的反馈。甚至 "返回 "和 "Esc "键的独特造型也很快被证明是很方便的。

我们的积极印象也延伸到了触摸板上。尺寸为13 x 8厘米（5.12 x 3.15英寸），即使用三个或四个手指也能精确输入。然而，我们确实希望隐藏在触摸板表面下的按钮能提供更多反馈。对于我们的口味来说，启动点略微太弱。

显示屏 - OLED和全高清相得益彰

全高清分辨率、60Hz刷新率、16:9长宽比和15.6英寸的屏幕尺寸可能会让人觉得完全过时。然而，在这些适度的规格背后是一个能够毫不费力地展示其优势的OLED显示屏。

由于其完美的黑色，它具有极高的对比度，这意味着屏幕出血也不是一个问题。在色彩还原方面，你很难将OLED面板与典型的液晶显示器相提并论--色彩看起来更加强烈和鲜艳。该屏幕的峰值亮度略低于400cd/m²，这实际上是相当平庸的。但它看起来比基于其他技术的显示器要生动得多，因为它有深邃的黑色和自发光的像素。

除其他外，该显示器经过潘通验证，以确保色彩的准确再现。即使我们没有进行任何后续校准，显示器的色差也已经低于可感知的阈值。光滑的表面是显示器的另一个重要方面，但它使笔记本电脑在户外使用时明显困难。

脉宽调制被用于调光显示器。59Hz的频率是特别低的。在我们的测试中，我们能够注意到在非常低的亮度水平上的闪烁。那些对PWM闪烁敏感的人应该远离该显示器。


380 cd/m²	382 cd/m²	378 cd/m²
378 cd/m²	378 cd/m²	380 cd/m²
374 cd/m²	374 cd/m²	382 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Samsung SDC4161 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 382 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 378.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 374 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.68
ΔE Greyscale 1.43 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Samsung SDC4161, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 BOE NE16N41, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00	HP Omen 16-n0033dx BOE0AAE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10	Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX B160QAN02.M, IPS-LED, 2560x1600, 16.00	Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Samsung ATNA45AF01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.50	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-18%	-18%	-15%	-1%	-54%
Display P3 Coverage	99.9	70.8 -29%	74.4 -26%	76.4 -24%	99.9 0%	39.4 -61%
sRGB Coverage	100	99.5 0%	99.2 -1%	100 0%	100 0%	58 -42%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	98.6	73.2 -26%	73.4 -26%	76.6 -22%	95.5 -3%	40.7 -59%
Response Times		-3168%	-1369%	-2505%	119%	-1766%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.74	38 ?(21.2, 16.8) -5035%	17.6 ?(10, 7.6) -2278%	33 ?(15, 18) -4359%	0.73 ?(0.37, 0.36) 1%	20.8 ?(11.2, 9.6) -2711%
Response Time Black / White *	2 ?(1, 1)	28 ?(13.2, 14.8) -1300%	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4) -460%	15 ?(5, 10) -650%	1 ?(0.5, 0.5) 50%	18.4 ?(10, 8.4) -820%
PWM Frequency	59 ?(50)				240.4 ?(100) 307%
Screen		8%	-12%	-7%	-5%	-109%
Brightness middle	378	288.9 -24%	373.3 -1%	411 9%	373 -1%	287.8 -24%
Brightness	378	276 -27%	361 -4%	378 0%	375 -1%	268 -29%
Brightness Distribution	98	92 -6%	79 -19%	83 -15%	99 1%	86 -12%
Black Level *		0.26	0.44	0.29		0.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.2	1.88 15%	2.12 4%	2.18 1%	2.26 -3%	6.3 -186%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.87	4.37 10%	5.62 -15%	4.84 1%	6.22 -28%	21.32 -338%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.68	0.42 84%	2.06 23%	1.48 45%		2.53 6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.43	1.4 2%	2.5 -75%	2.68 -87%	1.4 2%	4 -180%
Gamma	2.47 ^89%	2.3 ^96%	2.3 ^96%	2.43 ^91%	2.22 ^99%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	6464 ^101%	6634 ^98%	6408 ^101%	6717 ^97%	6417 ^101%	6762 ^96%
Contrast		1111	848	1417		959
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1059% / -528%	-466% / -240%	-842% / -425%	38% / 27%	-643% / -371%

* ... smaller is better

显示器在开箱时就已经被校准了。因此，你可以放心，只要笔记本电脑一开机，屏幕上的颜色就很准确。该显示器不仅能够完全覆盖sRGB，而且还能够覆盖Display-P3色域。该面板只比完全覆盖AdobeRGB色域（用于专业照片编辑）少了约1.5个百分点。对于一台价格约为1,000欧元（1,065美元）的笔记本电脑来说，这是一个了不起的结果。

鉴于该显示器在市场上被称为 "潘通验证"，它的色彩再现相对真实就不足为奇了。然而，蓝色的色调确实与它们的目标值有轻微的偏差，这样一个受过专业训练的照片编辑肯定能够注意到它。

校准显示器并没有带来任何改善，但由于已经有了出色的色彩准确性，这可能是多余的。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.74 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0 ms rise
0.74 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

59 Hz

≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 59 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 59 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

由于屏幕表面有光泽，在户外使用这台笔记本电脑并没有什么意义。尽管如此，OLED显示屏近400cd/m²的体面峰值亮度和高对比度使屏幕上的内容具有良好的可读性。该显示屏对于阅读、网页浏览或类似情况来说已经足够好。

在一系列角度观看时，显示屏上的图像似乎不受影响。亮度和颜色没有任何变化。我们只注意到在一个极端的角度观看屏幕时出现了非常微小的颜色偏移。

性能 - CPU和iGPU之间的协同作用令人印象深刻

除了性能优异的处理器，华硕VivoBook S15并没有任何其他突出的规格。内存和固态硬盘的速度和容量足以满足大多数应用的需要，但它们在高端领域的表现却很一般。

不用说，CPU和GPU负责大部分的计算性能，进而负责笔记本电脑的一般可用性。从我们收集的基准测试结果来看， AMD Ryzen 7 6800H对抗强大的商务笔记本电脑的CPU没有问题。集成的集成的AMD Radeon 680MGPU，至少在某种程度上，可以和一些独立显卡一样快。在任何情况下，Radeon 680M的性能都能超过竞争性的英特尔Iris Xe几倍，这取决于相关的任务。

尽管VivoBook S15不能跟上同级别的最强大的机型，但在性能方面，它与配备专用GPU的多媒体笔记本相差不大。在涉及图形处理的任务中，没有专用GPU的笔记本电脑的性能有时很小，但往往相当大。

测试条件

在执行所有基准测试时，我们在Window的集成电源管理中使用了 "最佳性能 "选项。预装的 "MyASUS "软件也有一个 "性能 "风扇模式，它不改变CPU的功耗，但可以在较长的任务中获得更好的性能。

处理器

的淘宝网是一个强大的处理器，大致上与英特尔酷睿i7-12700H.复杂的工作负荷、多任务处理和快速程序执行是该CPU擅长的一些核心内容。

与英特尔的同类产品一样，Ryzen 7的热设计功率为45瓦，当然不是那种节能的CPU，而是需要大量的电力和冷却来运行。

VivoBook S15的处理器在循环运行我们的Cinebench R15测试仅仅几分钟后，就开始削减其性能。但考虑到多媒体笔记本的预期应用只需要它在短时间内提供高性能，这其实并不是一个问题。相比之下，惠普Omen 16-n0033d内部的CPU HP Omen 16-n0033dx这款设计用于处理持续负载的游戏笔记本电脑，能够在整个测试期间发挥其全部性能。

然而，Ryzen 7设法在54瓦特（相当于其PL1）下运行了几分钟。即使在使用电池的情况下，功耗也没有受到太大的影响。它偶尔会在一瞬间上升到46瓦，并在很长一段时间内保持在42瓦。

你可以参考我们的CPU基准测试页面了解更多与性能有关的数据和比较。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø1970 (1926.5-2121.45)

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1998 (1901.59-2430.28)

HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø2136 (2104.6-2150.88)

Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1587 (1546.19-1980.59)

Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1973 (1877.58-2066.86)

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H: Ø1602 (1594.77-1626.41)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	82.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia	78.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	73.7 pt
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	73.3 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	73.1 pt
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	72.8 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	70.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	59.3 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	14704 (12621.1^min - 14704.4^max) Points +17%
Average of class Multimedia (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years)	14189 Points +13%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	13094 (12158.8^min - 13093.9^max) Points +4%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	13093 (12101.3^min - 13093.5^max) Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (11481 - 14660, n=10)	12941 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	12570 Points
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	11571 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	10226 (10089.9^min - 10226.3^max) Points -19%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	1766 Points +14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	1766 Points +14%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	1764 Points +14%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years)	1713 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1547 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (1500 - 1552, n=8)	1525 Points -1%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1500 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	1458 Points -6%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	5648 Points +17%
Average of class Multimedia (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years)	5352 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (4460 - 5661, n=8)	5087 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5083 Points +5%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	5072 Points +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	4839 Points
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	4465 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	3965 Points -18%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	681 Points +13%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	680 Points +13%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	675 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years)	646 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	603 Points
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	598 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (580 - 605, n=8)	595 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	564 Points -6%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	2430 (1901.59^min - 2430.28^max) Points +15%
Average of class Multimedia (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years)	2321 Points +9%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2151 (2104.6^min - 2150.88^max) Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2121 (1926.5^min - 2121.45^max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (1585 - 2366, n=9)	2086 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	2067 (1877.58^min - 2066.86^max) Points -3%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	1981 (1546.19^min - 1980.59^max) Points -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	1626 (1594.77^min - 1626.41^max) Points -23%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	254 Points +5%
Average of class Multimedia (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years)	251 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	249 Points +2%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	247 Points +2%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	243 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	243 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (182.7 - 250, n=9)	233 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	231 Points -5%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	306 Seconds * -21%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	301 Seconds * -19%
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years)	265 Seconds * -5%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	252 Seconds *
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	245 Seconds * +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (213 - 268, n=7)	240 Seconds * +5%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	236 Seconds * +6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	235 Seconds * +7%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	59929 MIPS +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (55963 - 64817, n=7)	59927 MIPS +6%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	58798 MIPS +4%
Average of class Multimedia (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years)	57411 MIPS +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	56351 MIPS
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	43173 MIPS -23%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	41015 MIPS -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	39886 MIPS -29%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (5669 - 5803, n=7)	5755 MIPS 0%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	5750 MIPS 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5748 MIPS
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5669 MIPS -1%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years)	5639 MIPS -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	5570 MIPS -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	5466 MIPS -5%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	5123 MIPS -11%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	11887 Points +28%
Average of class Multimedia (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years)	11372 Points +23%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	10570 Points +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (9218 - 10355, n=8)	9591 Points +4%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	9385 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	9263 Points
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	6833 Points -26%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	6403 Points -31%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	1786 Points +14%
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years)	1758 Points +12%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	1733 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	1681 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1568 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (1518 - 1568, n=8)	1551 Points -1%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1535 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	1446 Points -8%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (15 - 18.5, n=8)	16.5 fps +7%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	16.4 fps +6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	16.3 fps +6%
Average of class Multimedia (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years)	15.6 fps +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	15.4 fps
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	14 fps -9%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	13.1 fps -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	11.5 fps -25%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	59.3 s * -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	58.4 s * -16%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (48.7 - 79.5, n=7)	55.7 s * -11%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	54.2 s * -8%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	50.2 s *
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years)	48 s * +4%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	47.1 s * +6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	46.1 s * +8%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	0.532 sec * -7%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.501 sec * -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.495 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (0.4783 - 0.501, n=7)	0.4914 sec * +1%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years)	0.4811 sec * +3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.473 sec * +4%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4674 sec * +6%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P	0.467 sec * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2121 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

154.7 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

243 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	95.5 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	91.7 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	87.9 pt
Average of class Multimedia	77 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	75.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	70.8 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	62.1 pt
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	54 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	15776 KRay/s +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (12876 - 17031, n=7)	15299 KRay/s +9%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	14093 KRay/s
Average of class Multimedia (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years)	12788 KRay/s -9%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	12734 KRay/s -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	12156 KRay/s -14%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	9345 KRay/s -34%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6854 KRay/s -51%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	98596 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (82673 - 105987, n=7)	95959 Points +9%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	88203 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	75025 Points -15%
Average of class Multimedia (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years)	65480 Points -26%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	63563 Points -28%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	49203 Points -44%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32609 Points -63%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	3373 MB/s +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (2886 - 3634, n=7)	3276 MB/s +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	3085 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years)	3047 MB/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	2892 MB/s -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	2606 MB/s -16%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2365 MB/s -23%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	2359 MB/s -24%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	105430 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	102605 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (75117 - 106322, n=7)	97137 Points -5%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	96521 Points -6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	92646 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years)	92085 Points -10%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	82127 Points -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	78765 Points -23%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	12812 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (11771 - 13120, n=7)	12576 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	12439 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	9184 Points -26%
Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years)	9055 Points -27%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	8567 Points -31%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8279 Points -33%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	6522 Points -48%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	54169 Points +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (45287 - 58327, n=7)	52698 Points +10%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	47989 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	41153 Points -14%
Average of class Multimedia (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years)	33558 Points -30%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	31113 Points -35%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	24476 Points -49%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	19220 Points -60%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	135757 MB/s +9%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	124499 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (67816 - 137383, n=7)	119737 MB/s -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	100609 MB/s -19%
Average of class Multimedia (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years)	76070 MB/s -39%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	65597 MB/s -47%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	50040 MB/s -60%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	48462 MB/s -61%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	969 MB/s +26%
Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years)	868 MB/s +12%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	867 MB/s +12%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	844 MB/s +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (732 - 901, n=7)	827 MB/s +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	772 MB/s
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	684 MB/s -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	634 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	8357 KRay/s +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (6917 - 8980, n=7)	8119 KRay/s +9%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	7452 KRay/s
Average of class Multimedia (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years)	6829 KRay/s -8%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	6747 KRay/s -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	6545 KRay/s -12%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	5120 KRay/s -31%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3983 KRay/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	43359 MPixel/s +53%
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years)	36824 MPixel/s +30%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	35147 MPixel/s +24%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (28224 - 30360, n=7)	29390 MPixel/s +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	28346 MPixel/s
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	28300 MPixel/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	16218 MPixel/s -43%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	12863 MPixel/s -55%

系统性能

PCMark得分真正显示了处理器中的集成GPU有多好。具有可比处理能力但iGPU能力较差的笔记本电脑的得分大大低于VivoBook S15。

在它的帮助下 Radeon 680M的帮助下，VivoBook成功地进入了与戴尔Inspiron 16 Plus 7620相近的距离。戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7620尽管有一个专用的GPU在理论上应该给戴尔的笔记本电脑一个明显的优势。这表明VivoBook S15几乎拥有你所期望的多媒体笔记本的一切。它不仅在计算操作上很敏捷，而且还能在高水平上处理图形要求高的任务。

PCMark 10 / Score
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Radeon RX 6650M, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7205 Points +6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	6846 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	6780 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M (6591 - 6936, n=3)	6769 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years)	6602 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 6600H, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	6099 Points -10%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB	5969 Points -12%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	5726 Points -16%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M (10381 - 11158, n=3)	10682 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	10569 Points +2%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10551 Points +2%
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years)	10473 Points +1%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Radeon RX 6650M, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10471 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	10381 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	10172 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 6600H, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	9614 Points -7%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	9603 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M (9140 - 9759, n=3)	9501 Points -1%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Radeon RX 6650M, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9161 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	9098 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years)	8709 Points -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 6600H, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	8683 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	7232 Points -25%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7168 Points -25%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Radeon RX 6650M, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10582 Points +25%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	9409 Points +11%
Average of class Multimedia (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years)	8686 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	8485 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M (8092 - 8485, n=3)	8299 Points -2%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7634 Points -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 6600H, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	7376 Points -13%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	6667 Points -21%

CrossMark / Overall
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	1740 Points +9%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1728 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia (1009 - 2146, n=91, last 2 years)	1701 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M (1590 - 1704, n=2)	1647 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1590 Points
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Radeon RX 6650M, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1530 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	1492 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 6600H, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	1399 Points -12%

CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1675 Points +7%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	1651 Points +5%
Average of class Multimedia (971 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years)	1622 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M (1566 - 1674, n=2)	1620 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1566 Points
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Radeon RX 6650M, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1510 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	1499 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 6600H, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	1460 Points -7%

CrossMark / Creativity
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	1916 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2865, n=91, last 2 years)	1893 Points +11%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1814 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M (1708 - 1763, n=2)	1736 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1708 Points
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Radeon RX 6650M, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1672 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	1507 Points -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 6600H, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	1330 Points -22%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB	1637 Points +22%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	1523 Points +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M (1340 - 1625, n=2)	1483 Points +11%
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years)	1462 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 6600H, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	1431 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	1428 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1340 Points
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Radeon RX 6650M, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1221 Points -9%

PCMark 10 Score		6780 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	66612 MB/s +38%
Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years)	61455 MB/s +27%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	54375 MB/s +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (48209 - 51186, n=7)	50046 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	48695 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	48209 MB/s
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	31252 MB/s -35%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	28335 MB/s -41%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	66938 MB/s +33%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	62046 MB/s +23%
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years)	60555 MB/s +20%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (50372 - 51778, n=7)	51178 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	50443 MB/s
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	50372 MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	34300 MB/s -32%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32677 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years)	63628 MB/s +16%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	59294 MB/s +8%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	57432 MB/s +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (55085 - 55307, n=7)	55175 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	55101 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	55085 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	31788 MB/s -42%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	30592 MB/s -44%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, A370M	111.5 ns * -26%
Average of class Multimedia (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years)	102.3 ns * -16%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	94.7 ns * -7%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	88.2 ns *
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M	87.3 ns * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (83.1 - 89.6, n=7)	86.4 ns * +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	81.7 ns * +7%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

根据使用LatencyMon获得的结果，不建议将该笔记本电脑用于实时音频处理。尽管与它的直接竞争对手相比，它有一个令人愉快的低延迟。修改或更新驱动程序可能有助于改善这种情况，这也适用于延迟测量。在一个不太积极的方面，在播放我们的4K演示视频时，有17个丢帧。

在播放4K视频时，GPU的平均利用率为18%，令人印象深刻。相比之下，英特尔的Iris Xe集成GPU在这种情况下通常达到40%的利用率。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	2277 μs * -342%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Radeon RX 6650M, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1065.3 μs * -107%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	989.5 μs * -92%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB	848.7 μs * -65%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 6600H, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	818.7 μs * -59%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	515 μs *

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

由于Zen3+架构不支持PCIe 4.0，该固态硬盘的性能水平预计将低于竞争对手的笔记本电脑。在大约3000MB/s的速度下，连续读取速度利用了整个接口的带宽。因此，我们不期望这对系统性能有任何影响。

在我们的测试中，该硬盘的传输率在持续负载下非常稳定。与 Acer Swift X SFX16其M.2 SSD使用更快的PCIe 4.0接口，VivoBook S15取得了更高的平均传输速率。正如我们的DiskSpd测试所显示的那样，铜质隔热罩在确保SSD的异常稳定的访问速度方面发挥了作用。

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G

Sequential Read: 2831MB/s

Sequential Write: 1092MB/s

4K Read: 35.43MB/s

4K Write: 115.95MB/s

4K-64 Read: 817MB/s

4K-64 Write: 1522MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.083ms

Access Time Write: 0.132ms

Score Read: 1136Points

Score Write: 1747Points

Score Total: 3381Points

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	98.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia	67.4 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	59.9 pt
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	58.4 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	46 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	44.9 pt
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	44.9 pt
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	43.4 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	4206 (4179.41^min - 4206.02^max) MB/s +89%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3351 (3322.58^min - 3351.05^max) MB/s +51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	3005 (2991.17^min - 3004.66^max) MB/s +35%
Average of class Multimedia (756 - 4861, n=87, last 2 years)	2872 MB/s +29%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	2355 (2335.33^min - 2354.8^max) MB/s +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	2220 (2131.96^min - 2220.01^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	2220 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	2017 (1975.31^min - 2016.78^max) MB/s -9%
seq write
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	5015 (3544.4^min - 5014.54^max) MB/s +161%
Average of class Multimedia (790 - 5709, n=87, last 2 years)	2977 MB/s +55%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	2449 (1035.15^min - 2448.63^max) MB/s +27%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2226 (2194.89^min - 2225.5^max) MB/s +16%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	2020 (1893.72^min - 2020.34^max) MB/s +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1923 (1820.33^min - 1922.81^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	1923 MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	1875 (1783.83^min - 1874.64^max) MB/s -2%
seq q8 t1 read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	6940 (6614.84^min - 6939.9^max) MB/s +93%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6645 (6204.63^min - 6645.04^max) MB/s +85%
Average of class Multimedia (1023 - 7121, n=87, last 2 years)	5217 MB/s +45%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	3595 (2871^min - 3595.09^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	3595 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	3394 (2866.81^min - 3393.95^max) MB/s -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	3121 (2906.71^min - 3121.19^max) MB/s -13%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	2569 (2176.89^min - 2569.43^max) MB/s -29%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	5031 (4963.54^min - 5031.07^max) MB/s +157%
Average of class Multimedia (871 - 6761, n=87, last 2 years)	3947 MB/s +102%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	3230 (718.13^min - 3230.28^max) MB/s +65%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	2752 (2520.98^min - 2752.46^max) MB/s +41%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2226 (2197.2^min - 2225.92^max) MB/s +14%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1956 (1934.83^min - 1956.01^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	1956 MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	1887 (1836.05^min - 1887.23^max) MB/s -4%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	88 (81.83^min - 88.03^max) MB/s +87%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	66.5 (64.99^min - 66.45^max) MB/s +41%
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 149.1, n=87, last 2 years)	64.5 MB/s +37%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	62.7 (61.51^min - 62.72^max) MB/s +33%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	62.1 (60.55^min - 62.08^max) MB/s +32%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	48.7 (48.52^min - 48.66^max) MB/s +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	47 (39.82^min - 46.98^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	47 MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 write
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	305 (301.96^min - 304.87^max) MB/s +75%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	214 (210.68^min - 214.29^max) MB/s +22%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	187.3 (183.61^min - 187.28^max) MB/s +7%
Average of class Multimedia (80.9 - 378, n=87, last 2 years)	178.7 MB/s +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	174.7 (144.56^min - 174.67^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	174.7 MB/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	162.6 (156.2^min - 162.6^max) MB/s -7%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	145.2 (144.13^min - 145.16^max) MB/s -17%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	2605 (1553.88^min - 2604.5^max) MB/s +103%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	1647 (1643.01^min - 1646.6^max) MB/s +28%
Average of class Multimedia (416 - 4358, n=87, last 2 years)	1350 MB/s +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1282 (1164.42^min - 1282.42^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	1282 MB/s 0%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1270 (1241.61^min - 1269.8^max) MB/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	652 (637.52^min - 651.63^max) MB/s -49%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	577 (575.04^min - 577.4^max) MB/s -55%
4k q32 t16 write
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	2780 (2533.37^min - 2780.4^max) MB/s +583%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	1552 (1272.2^min - 1552.14^max) MB/s +281%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=87, last 2 years)	1067 MB/s +162%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	519 (492.51^min - 518.84^max) MB/s +28%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	484 (444.35^min - 484.09^max) MB/s +19%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	408 (386.27^min - 408.12^max) MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	407 (388.53^min - 407.32^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	407 MB/s 0%

AS SSD
Score Total
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	7636 Points +126%
Average of class Multimedia (2010 - 9972, n=84, last 2 years)	5067 Points +50%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4679 Points +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	4335 Points +28%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	3381 Points
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	3381 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	3300 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	2529 Points -25%
Score Read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	3136 Points +176%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	1756 Points +55%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1733 Points +53%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=84, last 2 years)	1695 Points +49%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	1190 Points +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1136 Points
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	1136 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	1008 Points -11%
Score Write
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	2968 Points +70%
Average of class Multimedia (545 - 4813, n=84, last 2 years)	2567 Points +47%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2205 Points +26%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	1845 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1747 Points
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	1747 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	1725 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	762 Points -56%
Seq Read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	5639 MB/s +99%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4741.94 MB/s +68%
Average of class Multimedia (1192 - 5730, n=84, last 2 years)	4005 MB/s +41%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	2995.72 MB/s +6%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	2862.67 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	2831 MB/s
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	2831 MB/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	2693.29 MB/s -5%
Seq Write
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	4171 MB/s +282%
Average of class Multimedia (388 - 5175, n=84, last 2 years)	2553 MB/s +134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	1864.19 MB/s +71%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1766.72 MB/s +62%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	1683.46 MB/s +54%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	1373.7 MB/s +26%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1092 MB/s
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	1092 MB/s 0%
4K Read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	76.1 MB/s +115%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	65.17 MB/s +84%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	65.01 MB/s +83%
Average of class Multimedia (30 - 98.5, n=84, last 2 years)	62.7 MB/s +77%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	45.88 MB/s +29%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	35.43 MB/s
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	35.4 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	35.24 MB/s -1%
4K Write
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	210.2 MB/s +81%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	197.81 MB/s +71%
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=84, last 2 years)	188.5 MB/s +63%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	181.87 MB/s +57%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	171.75 MB/s +48%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	135.79 MB/s +17%
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	116 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	115.95 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	2496 MB/s +206%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	1390.95 MB/s +70%
Average of class Multimedia (413 - 2989, n=84, last 2 years)	1231 MB/s +51%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1213.18 MB/s +48%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	855.48 MB/s +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	817 MB/s
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	817 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	686.43 MB/s -16%
4K-64 Write
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	2340 MB/s +54%
Average of class Multimedia (281 - 4265, n=84, last 2 years)	2123 MB/s +39%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1892.17 MB/s +24%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	1535.96 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1522 MB/s
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	1522 MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	1356.89 MB/s -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	395.8 MB/s -74%
Access Time Read
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	0.098 ms * -18%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	0.083 ms *
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	0.083 ms * -0%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	0.078 ms * +6%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.073 ms * +12%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.168, n=84, last 2 years)	0.0578 ms * +30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	0.056 ms * +33%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.031 ms * +63%
Access Time Write
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	0.4 ms * -203%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	0.132 ms *
Average WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G ()	0.132 ms * -0%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.089 ms * +33%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY	0.064 ms * +52%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	0.06 ms * +55%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=84, last 2 years)	0.05992 ms * +55%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.018 ms * +86%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G: Ø3601 (2999.77-3614.76)

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G: Ø2726 (2541.49-2809.97)

Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX WDC PC SN810 1TB: Ø3543 (251.99-6911.58)

图形卡

芯片 AMD Radeon 680M作为一款集成显卡，其性能非常好。配备了英特尔酷睿i7-12700H和Iris Xe 96EUs，华硕VivoBook S14X的性能非常好。华硕VivoBook S14X在3DMark中的表现低于其潜力，甚至没有得到S15的一半分数。

当涉及到渲染时，结果也是同样的好。VivoBook S15完成多媒体任务所需的时间比其他配备iGPU的笔记本电脑少得多，这是它专门设计的内容。带有独立显卡的竞争笔记本电脑在这个部门只能与VivoBook相提并论。

总而言之，AMD的集成图形解决方案可以轻松应对英特尔A370M在大多数情况下。它的性能甚至超过了 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop中的联想IdeaPad Gaming 3在Blender Benchmark中，但RTX 3050在3DMark和实际游戏中远远领先。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-n0033dx ^-1! AMD Radeon RX 6650M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	100 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	68.1 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	62.9 pt
Average of class Multimedia	60.7 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P	40.4 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	33.7 pt
Average AMD Radeon 680M	32.6 pt
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	15.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Radeon RX 6650M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	32846 Points +236%
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=89, last 2 years)	18929 Points +94%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	18679 Points +91%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	18557 Points +90%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P	12338 Points +26%
Average AMD Radeon 680M (6858 - 11605, n=32)	9979 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	9772 Points
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	6145 Points -37%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	83568 Points +93%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	66662 Points +54%
Average of class Multimedia (14679 - 150699, n=60, last 2 years)	58293 Points +35%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	43225 Points
Average AMD Radeon 680M (24634 - 50120, n=25)	40724 Points -6%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P	39098 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	16313 Points -62%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Radeon RX 6650M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	25739 Points +286%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	14157 Points +113%
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=90, last 2 years)	14005 Points +110%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	13760 Points +107%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P	8307 Points +25%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	6661 Points
Average AMD Radeon 680M (3791 - 7593, n=33)	6660 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	3263 Points -51%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Radeon RX 6650M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	8700 Points +267%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	5352 Points +126%
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=90, last 2 years)	5310 Points +124%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	5295 Points +123%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P	3899 Points +64%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2373 Points
Average AMD Radeon 680M (1359 - 2607, n=33)	2221 Points -6%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H	1003 Points -58%

3DMark 11 Performance		9959 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		32518 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		6144 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		2663 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	668 Seconds * -67%
Average of class Multimedia (110 - 683, n=6, last 2 years)	403 Seconds * -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	400 Seconds *
Average AMD Radeon 680M (270 - 555, n=29)	349 Seconds * +13%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Arc A370M, Intel Core i7-1260P	564 Seconds * -33%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H	532 Seconds * -25%
Average AMD Radeon 680M (389 - 572, n=29)	474 Seconds * -12%
Average of class Multimedia (190 - 1374, n=83, last 2 years)	447 Seconds * -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	436 Seconds * -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	425 Seconds *
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Radeon RX 6650M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	394 Seconds * +7%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在需要长时间高水平性能的游戏中，该系统的限制变得很明显。由于CPU和GPU之间共享相同的冷却能力，在满负荷的情况下，节流似乎是不可避免的。

通过观察图形质量提高时帧率的快速下降，你可以轻易地观察到这一点。例如，在《GTA V》和《奇异旅团》中，AMD Radeon 680M的 AMD Radeon 680M在最低设置下可以毫不费力地跟上小型游戏笔记本。一旦设置调高，游戏因此变得更加苛刻，帧率将开始大幅下降。这是因为系统在满负荷运行，产生的热量超过了它的散热能力，从而导致节流和性能下降。

也就是说，特别是要求不高的游戏（包括目前的《FIFA 23》）在VivoBook S15上非常好玩，即使不是在最高设置下。

Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16-n0033dx ^-1! AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M	84.2 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	80.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	66.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia	65.2 pt
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M	31.1 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	29 pt
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.6 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M	90.1 (84^min) fps +275%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	57 (53^min) fps +138%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	55.8 (52^min) fps +133%
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years)	50.6 fps +111%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M	26.3 (24^min, 25^P1) fps +10%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	24 fps
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	9.6 (8^min) fps -60%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	75.4 (7.66^min, 50^P1) fps +266%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	60.3 (7.33^min, 37^P1) fps +193%
Average of class Multimedia (4.24 - 123, n=88, last 2 years)	56.3 fps +173%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	20.6 (5.54^min, 14.5^P1) fps
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M	16.4 (1.81^min, 10.2^P1) fps -20%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	4.24 (0.576^min, 2.56^P1) fps -79%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M	83.2 fps +271%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	54.1 fps +142%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	53.5 fps +139%
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=89, last 2 years)	50.6 fps +126%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M	26.3 fps +17%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	22.4 fps
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.6 fps -53%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M	167.2 (61.1^min, 120.8^P1) fps +327%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	95.2 (68.1^min, 72.5^P1) fps +143%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	95.1 (59^min, 71.2^P1) fps +143%
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=86, last 2 years)	89.9 fps +129%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M	52.1 (41.7^min, 43.4^P1) fps +33%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	39.2 (18.3^min, 25^P1) fps
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.9 (5.4^min, 6.09^P1) fps -54%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	140.7 (122.6^min) fps +291%
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 171.6, n=90, last 2 years)	101.6 fps +182%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M	100 (82.7^min) fps +178%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	95.2 (85.1^min) fps +164%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M	66.3 (43.4^min) fps +84%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40 (36.1^min) fps +11%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	36 (34.5^min) fps

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	92.8 fps +126%
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 131.1, n=95, last 2 years)	68.4 fps +67%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	63.6 fps +55%
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M	46.4 fps +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	41 fps
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	34.9 fps -15%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M	24 fps -41%

Far Cry 5 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | F1 22 | FIFA 23

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia (20 - 162, n=55, last 2 years)	79.1 fps +93%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M	49 fps +20%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	41 (37^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M (21 - 45, n=24)	36.2 fps -12%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia (18 - 154, n=60, last 2 years)	74.5 fps +96%
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M	46 fps +21%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	38 (34^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M (18 - 41, n=24)	33.1 fps -13%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Low Preset
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M	126.8 (56.9^min) fps +217%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	79.5 (17.7^min) fps +99%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	72.9 (14.5^min) fps +82%
Average of class Multimedia (9.1 - 130, n=45, last 2 years)	69.1 fps +73%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	40 fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M (26 - 50.6, n=15)	38 fps -5%
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.6 (8.3^min) fps -63%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M	106.3 (58.3^min) fps +325%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	66.2 (28.1^min) fps +165%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	62.4 (33.8^min) fps +150%
Average of class Multimedia (11.7 - 113, n=44, last 2 years)	59.7 fps +139%
Average AMD Radeon 680M (20.1 - 41.8, n=15)	29 fps +16%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	25 fps
Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	11.7 (8.1^min) fps -53%

F1 22
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M	215 (159^min, 131^P1) fps +205%
Average of class Multimedia (10.9 - 242, n=49, last 2 years)	118.4 fps +68%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	70.5 (58^min, 53^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M (38 - 74.6, n=23)	63.7 fps -10%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M	178.2 (151^min, 121^P1) fps +241%
Average of class Multimedia (7.73 - 183, n=51, last 2 years)	92.1 fps +76%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	52.2 (43^min, 31^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M (30 - 55, n=23)	47.2 fps -10%

FIFA 23
1920x1080 Medium Rendering Quality
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	73 (31.2^P0.1, 39.6^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M (71.6 - 73, n=2)	72.3 fps -1%
Average of class Multimedia (47 - 73, n=3, last 2 years)	60.7 fps -17%
1920x1080 High Rendering Quality
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	51 (30.5^P0.1, 36.1^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M (44.5 - 51, n=2)	47.8 fps -6%
Average of class Multimedia (40 - 51, n=3, last 2 years)	43.7 fps -14%

在Witcher 3 ，帧率保持稳定。笔记本电脑一旦配置正确，就能提供稳定的性能，尽管在处理短时的工作负荷时，它的性能并不高。

这项测试也证明了 Radeon 680M远远领先于 Iris Xe的水平，并且可以达到英特尔A370M.

Witcher 3 FPS chart

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M: Ø23.9 (19-25)

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø50.5 (48-54)

Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX i7-1260P, A370M: Ø26.3 (24-28)

LG Gram 16Z90Q i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø11.4 (7-16)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	147.5	136.8	47.6	20.6
The Witcher 3 (2015)	125	77	40	24
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	37.2	36.7	36.2	36
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	63.8	32.3	22.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	60.6	50.2	41
Far Cry 5 (2018)	77	41	38	36
Strange Brigade (2018)	131.3	54.4	45.4	39.2
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	40	25	20	19
F1 22 (2022)	80.8	70.5	52.2	0 ()
FIFA 23 (2022)	83	73	51	53

排放--Ryzen 7的冷却装置会变得很响亮

噪声排放

单个风扇在需要启动时可能会变得非常响亮。噪音水平可以超过60分贝，当然也很烦人。但至少风扇不会突然改变速度，也不会以令人不快的方式转起来。

在负载高峰期，风扇的噪音并不令人恼火。但是，当VivoBook在进行较长时间的渲染任务时，最好把它放在另一个房间里，关上房门。我们绝对建议在笔记本上玩游戏时戴上一副耳机。

如果你想在办公室环境下使用VivoBook，你也可以在MyASUS应用程序中选择另一种风扇模式。这使笔记本电脑的性能降低了几个百分点，但确保风扇噪音保持在几乎听不到的水平。除此以外，人们只能希望继任者配备双风扇设置。

低声模式和性能模式之间的风扇速度只有百分之几的差别，但感知到的响度却增加了八倍。

Noise Level

Idle		26 / 26 / 28.1 dB(A)
Load		56.9 / 62.6 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A)

	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G	HP Omen 16-n0033dx Radeon RX 6650M, R7 6800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX A370M, i7-1260P, WDC PC SN810 1TB	Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 6600H, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY
Noise		7%	8%	12%	13%	15%
off / environment *	26	23.3 10%	24.2 7%	25 4%	22.7 13%	23.3 10%
Idle Minimum *	26	25.7 1%	27.4 -5%	25 4%	23.2 11%	23.8 8%
Idle Average *	26	26.1 -0%	27.4 -5%	25 4%	23.2 11%	23.8 8%
Idle Maximum *	28.1	30.6 -9%	28.9 -3%	25 11%	27.2 3%	27.2 3%
Load Average *	56.9	46.2 19%	32.3 43%	44.7 21%	43.2 24%	34.8 39%
Load Maximum *	62.6	49.4 21%	57.6 8%	45.6 27%	52.8 16%	49.4 21%
Witcher 3 ultra *		49.2	54.1		52.8	49.3

* ... smaller is better

温度

与它产生的噪音水平不同，这台笔记本电脑在极端条件下只会变得适度温暖。在我们的测试中，机箱温度在某些地方只达到50℃（122℉）。这并没有引起我们的注意，更不用说困扰我们了，特别是由于掌托保持凉爽。

在运行我们测试的游戏时，我们尤其注意到了这一点。触摸板和键盘变热了，但触摸起来一点都不热。然而，在压力测试期间，这些表面确实变热了几度，以至于键盘在使用时可能变得不舒服。

Max. Load

Idle


40.6 °C	50.2 °C	42.4 °C
34.5 °C	47.4 °C	41.1 °C
26.9 °C	30.3 °C	33.3 °C

Maximum: 50.2 °C
Average: 38.5 °C


41.2 °C	47.6 °C	43.9 °C
40.5 °C	50.2 °C	32 °C
30.7 °C	31.6 °C	26.2 °C

Maximum: 50.2 °C
Average: 38.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 62.7 °C | Room Temperature 24 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.3 °C / 91.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).

	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	HP Omen 16-n0033dx AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon RX 6650M	Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Arc A370M	Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Heat		9%	13%	2%	16%	12%
Maximum Upper Side *	50.2	46 8%	41.2 18%	49.4 2%	37.2 26%	47.6 5%
Maximum Bottom *	50.2	45.8 9%	53.2 -6%	55.5 -11%	39.2 22%	46.6 7%
Idle Upper Side *	32.1	29.2 9%	26.4 18%	28.4 12%	30.4 5%	27.2 15%
Idle Bottom *	34.6	31 10%	27.8 20%	32.6 6%	31.6 9%	27.2 21%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

当把系统推到极限时，我们看到CPU时钟速度在近3分钟后下降，而GPU频率在7分钟后下降。之后，CPU和GPU的时钟速度仍然很高，但没有再次达到它们各自的初始水平。

VivoBook S15的设计不是为了处理持续的负载，特别是考虑到它的热限制和相对较小的风扇。它最多只能应付偶尔的高工作负荷，每次几分钟。

发言人

VivoBook的扬声器对于内置在笔记本电脑中的东西来说听起来不错。从低中音到高音，一切听起来都很准确，有时甚至很有力。扬声器对于听音乐来说是不错的，对于欣赏电影和在线视频来说也很好。

我们几乎都没有注意到它们几乎没有低音。即便如此，你绝对应该避免听重低音的音乐，因为扬声器很难做到这一点。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--由于OLED和iGPU，VivoBook拥有强大的耐力

消耗功率

VivoBook S15在闲置时消耗的电量很少，墙纸上显示的大部分是黑色。这显示了CPU的效率和自发光像素的优势，在图像的黑色部分保持关闭。

90瓦的电源适配器在负载下为笔记本电脑提供了足够的电力。此外，VivoBook可能不会经常被放在持续的负载下，因为它通常是用于多媒体使用。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / 1.55 Watt
Idle	4.4 / 5.1 / 9.3 Watt
Load	67 / 93.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00	HP Omen 16-n0033dx R7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10	Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX i7-1260P, A370M, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS-LED, 2560x1600, 16.00	Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.50	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 R5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Average AMD Radeon 680M	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		-70%	-118%	-13%	-10%	-68%	-18%	-60%
Idle Minimum *	4.4	6.8 -55%	7.9 -80%	3.7 16%	5.1 -16%	7.7 -75%	6.75 ?(2.2 - 10.8, n=30) -53%	7.29 ?(2.2 - 34.6, n=96, last 2 years) -66%
Idle Average *	5.1	9.6 -88%	11.5 -125%	7.6 -49%	7.7 -51%	9.1 -78%	8.75 ?(4.4 - 12.8, n=30) -72%	11.8 ?(4.6 - 43, n=96, last 2 years) -131%
Idle Maximum *	9.3	17 -83%	18.3 -97%	11.1 -19%	11 -18%	15.6 -68%	10.3 ?(5.1 - 18.6, n=30) -11%	14.6 ?(5.6 - 44.9, n=96, last 2 years) -57%
Load Average *	67	117.5 -75%	88.1 -31%	70 -4%	73.9 -10%	90.7 -35%	52.8 ?(20 - 77.7, n=30) 21%	77.7 ?(14.3 - 147, n=95, last 2 years) -16%
Witcher 3 ultra *	66.4	113.1 -70%	206 -210%	68.8 -4%	42.7 36%	122.9 -85%
Load Maximum *	93.5	137.4 -47%	246.4 -164%	108 -16%	93 1%	155.2 -66%	69.4 ?(48 - 103.2, n=30) 26%	121 ?(47.7 - 247, n=95, last 2 years) -29%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø66.4 (62.7-70.4)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø90.8 (88.3-93.7)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.77 (4.27-8.99)

Power consumption with external monitor

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø64.6 (60.9-91.3)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø74.3 (66.9-86)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø70.2 (65.7-85.5)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø64.4 (62.7-75.4)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.28 (2.88-5.38)

电池寿命

华硕多媒体笔记本电脑的电池寿命远远超过10小时，在各种使用场景下都有足够的耐力，包括在平均屏幕亮度下的网络浏览。S15可以持续四个小时，比笔记本S14X的时间长四个小时，后者具有相同的电池容量。在这种特殊情况下，电池寿命的差异部分是由于S14X的高端显示屏，当然还有S15的高效AMD处理器（相对于14英寸VivoBook的英特尔CPU）。

使用黑暗模式可以进一步提高电池寿命。这种模式在VivoBook以及一般的OLED显示屏的系统上是默认启用的。然而，它通常需要在浏览器中手动激活。启用黑暗模式会使大多数像素在后台保持关闭状态，从而不消耗任何电力。为了证明这节省了多少电力，我们进行了两次相同的测试，一次是在浏览器中启用黑暗模式，另一次是不启用：电池持续了930分钟，而不是禁用黑暗模式时的近700分钟--几乎多了4小时。

当CPU被置于繁重的工作负荷下时，电池寿命是相当短的。该系统只持续了一个小时，因为华硕允许处理器单独消耗超过40瓦的电力。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		11h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 46min
Load (maximum brightness)		0h 59min

	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M, 70 Wh	Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh	HP Omen 16-n0033dx R7 6800H, Radeon RX 6650M, 68 Wh	Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX i7-1260P, A370M, 56 Wh	Asus VivoBook S 14X S5402Z i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 R5 6600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 45 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		0%	-13%	-10%	-39%	-26%	14%
H.264	766			624 -19%			710 ?(319 - 1481, n=53, last 2 years) -7%
WiFi v1.3	692	575 -17%	418 -40%	543 -22%	425 -39%	389 -44%	572 ?(274 - 1204, n=95, last 2 years) -17%
Load	59	69 17%	68 15%	65 10%		55 -7%	97.7 ?(39 - 215, n=76, last 2 years) 66%

Pros

+ 伟大的系统性能

+ 高对比度、色彩准确的OLED显示屏

+ 非常长的电池寿命

+ 易于维护

+ 价格相对低廉

Cons

- 负载下风扇声音大

- 少量的I/O端口

- 有限的RAM

结论 - 内部结构使VivoBook成为一个引人注目的选择

华硕的多媒体笔记本电脑可能看起来低于平均水平，它的黑色机箱不大，缺乏专用的GPU，有限的内存和不支持Thunderbolt的微薄的端口选择。

但是，一旦你看到它的高对比度OLED，能够产生深邃的黑色和高度准确的色彩，你对该设备的印象就会开始改变。而当VivoBook开机时，你的看法将完全改变。

AMD的CPU可以毫不费力地跟上英特尔的强大对手。当涉及到渲染和较简单的游戏等图形工作负载时，集成的Radeon显卡击败了英特尔的iGPU。

凭借OLED面板和类似于入门级独立GPU的图形性能，VivoBook为一台高效且几乎总是足够的多媒体笔记本电脑提供了完美的性能水平。

这意味着它有足够的计算能力用于媒体编辑（如视频）和3D应用，尽管在游戏时你可能不得不做出一些妥协。同时，VivoBook享有没有独立GPU的好处：它有一个相当薄的机箱，不会过度发热，并且有出色的电池寿命，在我们的Wi-Fi测试中持续了15个小时，令人印象深刻。

更重要的是，VivoBook的价格适中，尤其是相对于有专用GPU的竞争笔记本而言。例如， Acer Swift X SFX16提供了类似的性能，尽管没有OLED面板，但价格明显更高。也就是说，这款笔记本电脑确实有一些限制。端口太少，而且没有一个支持高于10Gbit/s的速度。机箱一点也不觉得高级，尽管它看起来相当结实。而且，它使用的是单风扇冷却解决方案，而且内存容量限制在16GB，这一点也不一定给我们留下深刻印象。

也就是说，这些缺点并没有真正伤害到一台多媒体笔记本电脑的核心优势。VivoBook S15不是这个类别中最快、最时尚或装备最好的笔记本电脑，但它是一个合理的选择，可以很好地处理你扔给它的几乎一切。

对于那些寻求更多图形性能的人来说，戴尔Inspiron 16 Plus 7620是一个不错的选择。戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7620配有RTX 3050 Ti，显然是一个顶级竞争者。如果媒体编辑不那么重要，而游戏是优先事项，你可以看一下 HP Omen 16它有相同的处理器，但有一个专用的GPU。

价格和可用性

我们的审查配置（华硕VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W）可以从Notebooksbilliger订购为999欧元（1060美元）。带有2.8K OLED显示屏和更大的SSD（M3502RA-MA014X）的变体也可在Amazon.de售价为1,200欧元（1,274美元）。对于那些在美国的人，你可以直接从华硕商店购买配备了更强大的Ryzen 9 6900HX的VivoBook S15只需999美元。

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W - 2023-02-22 02/22/2023 v7
Mario Petzold

Chassis

79 / 98 → 80%

Keyboard

85%

Pointing Device

84%

Connectivity

52 / 80 → 65%

Weight

64 / 20-72 → 85%

Battery

89 / 95 → 93%

Display

89%

Games Performance

75 / 90 → 84%

Application Performance

95 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

90%

Noise

62 / 95 → 65%

Audio

72%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Average

75%

83%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Zhiwei Zhuang - Translator - 149 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕VivoBook S15笔记本评测：iGPU提供性能提升

Mario Petzold, 2023-02-24 (Update: 2023-02-24)