Honor Magic8 Pro Air 的评价
Magic8 Pro Air 可能不是市场上最薄的手机,但与三星Galaxy S25 Edge 和Apple iPhone Air 相比,喜欢轻巧灵便智能手机的用户在Honor 手机上需要做出的妥协要少得多。
Magic8 Pro Air 的摄像头尤其出人意料地出色,与Apple 手机相比简直是天壤之别。电池和智能手机的续航能力也是如此。在这方面,Honor 做得非常出色。
USB 端口的迟缓和 Dimensity 9500 开箱后的轻微抖动与这款毫不妥协的紧凑型旗舰产品的概念不太相符。在通过进口方式购买之前,还应该考虑到有限的供货以及由此导致的更新和保修范围的不确定性。
Pros
Cons
Honor Magic8 Pro Air 的价格和供货情况
Honor Magic8 Pro Air 可能仍将是中国独有的产品,不过中文版也配备了多语言包。从Trading Shenzhen 等零售商处进口的价格约为 700 欧元(约合人民币 808 元)。
译者注:Honor 智能手机未在北美正式发售。
Honor Magic8 Pro Air 的规格
外壳和功能 -Android 薄型手机,无 USB 3 端口

尽管 Magic8 Pro Air 的背面是塑料材质,但给人的感觉却相当高档。得益于其紧凑的尺寸和纤薄的显示屏边框,这款Honor 智能手机的厚度仅为 6.1 毫米,拿在手上非常舒适。尽管采用了铝制边框和大容量电池,但这款轻薄的高端手机还是配得上它名字中的 "Air "后缀,因为 Magic8 Pro Air 甚至比 iPhone Air 还要轻 10 克。 iPhone Air尽管后者的电池容量相对较小,也没有 IP69 等级认证。
小巧的外形在功能设置上也几乎看不出来。红外爆破器、高达 50 瓦的快速无线充电、无线反向充电、80 瓦有线充电以及非常出色的超声波指纹传感器都包括在内。唯一真正的缺点是 USB 2.0 端口速度较慢,不支持视频输出。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
通信和操作 -Honor 带 Wi-Fi 功能的智能手机 7
| Networking | |
| Honor Magic8 Pro Air | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Motorola Signature | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件与可持续发展 -Android 智能手机的长期更新?
Magic8 Pro Air 预装了Android 16 和Honor的 MagicOS 10 用户界面。尽管是中文版,但系统语言可以设置为德语。
安全补丁是最新的。不过,我们无法确定这款仅在中国销售的 Air 究竟会在多长时间内收到更新。制造商可能会沿用其 Pro 机型的政策,该机型预计将在欧洲以外地区获得四年的支持。
Honor 智能手机的外包装似乎是无塑料的。该公司没有提供任何有关可持续发展的信息。
摄像头 - 配备潜望镜长焦镜头的超薄旗舰手机
后置摄像头模块在外观上与Apple相似,但成像质量要高得多。虽然Honor的 Air 机型没有使用与 Magic8 Pro 相同的主摄像头,但其传感器同样大,为 1/1.3 英寸。
Magic8 Pro Air 拍出的照片确实不错,鉴于其小巧纤薄的设计,这些照片甚至非常出色。与 iPhone 17的样张进行比较,后者使用了与 iPhone Air与 iPhone 17 的样张进行比较,可以看出明显的档次差异。即使在日光下,Honor 手机也能提供更多的细节、更好的动态范围和更少的人工锐化。
与Apple的 Air 机型依靠单摄像头设置不同,Magic8 Pro Air 包括一个功能非常强大的 5000 万像素超广角摄像头和一个带 OIS 的潜望式长焦镜头。后者提供 6400 万像素和 3.2 倍光学变焦。长焦镜头的变焦倍数高达 5 倍,非常吸引人,尤其适合拍摄人像。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide angle

显示屏 - 色彩准确的小型 OLED 屏幕
6.31 英寸 LTPO OLED 显示屏的运行频率高达 120 Hz,我们测量的峰值亮度略低于 1,700 cd/m²。Honor 还列出了在 PBM 模式下高达 6000 尼特的峰值,这意味着 Magic8 Pro Air 和 Magic8 Pro Air 一样,都能在 HBM 模式下达到峰值亮度。 Magic8 Pro一样,在显示 HDR 内容时,亮度会明显提高。
得益于 4320 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光,OLED 面板相对来说比较容易看清。不过,仅 120 Hz 的低基频意味着不能排除敏感用户会感到不适。
卡尔曼测量的色彩再现非常准确,肉眼无法看到与参考色之间的差异。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1324 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.93 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.75}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.224
CCT: 6383 K
| Honor Magic8 Pro Air OLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Motorola Signature AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8" | Apple iPhone Air OLED, 2736x1260, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -93% | -27% | -25% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1324 | 1399 6% | 1561 18% | 1060 -20% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1311 | 1371 5% | 1547 18% | 1064 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 94 -4% | 99 1% | 98 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.93 | 3.9 -319% | 1.46 -57% | 1.3 -40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.07 | 6.3 -204% | 3.63 -75% | 3 -45% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 2.1 -40% | 2.5 -67% | 1.9 -27% |
| Gamma | 2.224 99% | 2.01 109% | 2.144 103% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6383 102% | 6506 100% | 6612 98% | 6519 100% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Signature | |
| Honor Magic8 Pro Air | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Signature | |
| Honor Magic8 Pro Air | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 12 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7962 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.3 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间 - 配备高端 SoC 的小巧型Android 智能手机
尽管外形轻薄小巧 联发科 Dimensity 9500在压力测试中的表现与大型旗舰手机一样稳定,Air 机型的绝对性能也非常出色。不过,Honor 似乎在开箱时对高端芯片组略有限制,因为 OPPO Find X9 Pro和 Vivo X300 Pro在基准测试中获得了更高的分数。
即便如此,Magic8 Pro Air 在日常使用中依然感觉非常流畅。处理器 ARM Mali G1-UltraGPU 也为游戏提供了充足的图形处理能力。在 GFXBench 的 4K 测试中,超过 60 fps 的帧数对于一款小巧的旗舰机来说是一个令人印象深刻的成绩。
与其超薄对手的 "迷你电池 "相比 超薄对手Magic8 Pro Air 的 5,500 mAh 电池容量非常大。在我们的电池测试中,这款小巧的Honor 手机续航时间超过了 20 小时。
* ... smaller is better
| Honor Magic8 Pro Air | Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | Motorola Signature | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 131% | 266% | 202% | 78% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3567.89 | 3907.51 10% | 4049.69 14% | 3708 ? 4% | 2102 ? -41% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 339.02 | 2285.66 574% | 3774.28 1013% | 3170 ? 835% | 1803 ? 432% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 377.83 | 431.86 14% | 613.85 62% | 404 ? 7% | 293 ? -22% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 821.54 | 210.99 -74% | 628.08 -24% | 498 ? -39% | 349 ? -58% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Signature | |
| Honor Magic8 Pro Air | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic8 Pro Air audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Honor Magic8 Pro Air 5500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3900 mAh | Motorola Signature 5200 mAh | Apple iPhone Air 3149 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 20.3 | 17.9 -12% | 19.7 -3% | 15.4 -24% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
通过 Magic8 Pro Air,Honor 证明了小巧、轻薄的智能手机是可以实现的,而无需做出重大妥协。
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
- 03/27/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich
可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honor Magic8 Pro Air MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | List Price: 800€ | 155 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.31" 2640x1216 461 PPI OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | List Price: 1249€ | 163 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 3120x1440 395 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | List Price: 1000 Euro | 186 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.80" 2780x1264 450 PPI AMOLED | |
| Apple iPhone Air Apple A19 Pro ⎘ Apple A19 Pro 5-Core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1449€ | 165 g | Apple 512GB NVMe | 6.50" 2736x1260 463 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.













































