Notebookcheck Logo
(图片来源：Alex Wätzel）

vivo X300 Pro 不仅仅是不寻常的相机设置--vivo X300 Pro 评测

有潜力的冠军

传统上，vivo X 系列以其与蔡司合作的高端摄像头配置而闻名。X300 Pro 也不例外，它不仅拥有出色的主摄像头，其副摄像头也同样令人印象深刻。除此之外，这款智能手机表现出色，但也存在一些弱点。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Smartphone Touchscreen Android 5G

对 vivo X300 Pro 的评价

vivo X300 Pro 是一款旗舰级拍照智能手机，功能几乎毫不逊色，主要面向摄影和视频爱好者。其多功能三摄像头设置、出色的弱光性能、包括 8K 录像在内的超强视频灵活性和卓越的防抖功能的组合，显然将该设备的重点放在了移动成像上。此外，它还配备了明亮的 LTPO AMOLED 显示屏、IP69 认证、超快超声波指纹传感器以及 Wi-Fi 7、三频 GNSS 和对讲机功能等现代通信功能。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

即便如此，考虑到其 1600 美元左右的建议零售价，它还是存在一些比较关键的弱点。在连续负载的情况下，它的性能会明显下降，GNSS 功能比较一般，扬声器的声音在同价位手机中听起来比较尖锐，电池续航时间也没有达到预期。

总之，vivo X300 Pro 是一款功能强大的拍照智能手机，高端气息浓厚，但在细节方面确实需要做出一些妥协。

Pros

+ 强大的相机设置
+ 明亮精确的 LTPO 面板
+ 高性能
+ IP69 认证
+ 快速充电
+ 36 个月保修

Cons

- 无 UWB
- 普通扬声器
- 节流
- 无气压计

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时，vivo X300 Pro 尚未在美国上市。

X300 Pro 是继 X200 Pro在欧洲，你只能买到配备 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 内部存储空间的版本。

这款高端智能手机再次与蔡司（Zeiss）联手，其摄像头配置给人留下了深刻印象。这款手机的零售价约为 1,600 美元，虽然并不便宜，但它承诺提供全面的高端功能。

规格Vivo X300 Pro

Vivo X300 Pro (X300 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 8 x 2.7 - 4.2 GHz, Cortex-X930 Travis / Cortex-A730 6x Gelas
Graphics adapter
Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.78 inch 20:9, 2800 x 1260 pixel 453 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, Q10 Plus, Armor Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 475.26 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, Color, Flicker, Hall, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.99 x 161.98 x 75.48
Battery
19.75 Wh, 5440 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode; Battery cycles: 1200, 3.63 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (LYT-828, 1/1.28", f/1.57, Cipa 5.5, Gimbal-OIS) + 50 MPix (JN1, Ultra wide, 1/2.76", f/2.0, AF) + 200 MPix (3.7x Tele, 1/1.4", f/2.7, OIS); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (JN1, 1/2.76", f/2.0, AF)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), SIM,Tool, Case, OriginOS 6, 36 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: no information available | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E3a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5), SBAS | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | up to 2 eSIMs, up to 2 Nano-SIMs | IP68 / IP69 | USB Copy Test: 347.2 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: - W/kg, Head-SAR: - W/kg | max. charging speed: 90 W (wired) / 40 W (wireless), fanless, waterproof
Released
10/13/2025
Weight
226 g
Price
1399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - vivo X300 Pro 通过 IP6 保护认证

vivo X300 Pro 有沙丘棕和魅影黑两种颜色。根据制造商的说法，这款智能手机的高度为 7.99 毫米，而我们测量的高度为 8.3 毫米，包括摄像头模块在内为 14.4 毫米。摄像头让 X300 Pro 有点头重脚轻，但我们并不觉得这很讨厌。

它的边框由哑光铝合金制成，手机的正面和背面都覆盖着玻璃。这给 X300 Pro 带来了高品质的外观。当试图扭动时，手机会发出嘎吱嘎吱的声音，但整体感觉还是很稳定。这款智能手机具有防尘和防水功能，甚至可以承受高压水。

(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
带箱子（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
带箱子（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）

尺寸比较

❌
163.4 mm 78 mm 8.8 mm 233 g162.8 mm 77.6 mm 8.2 mm 218 g161.3 mm 75.3 mm 9.35 mm 229 g161.98 mm 75.48 mm 7.99 mm 226 g161.3 mm 76.5 mm 8.3 mm 224 g152.8 mm 72 mm 8.6 mm 207 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 具有对讲机功能

与 小米 15T Pro或 Tecno Slim 5Gvivo X300 Pro 具有对讲机功能，无需蜂窝连接即可与其他兼容设备通信。您可以使用远距离蓝牙连接拨打电话或发送信息。遗憾的是，vivo 做了自己的事情，这意味着不同制造商的系统不能相互兼容。

X300 Pro 配备了快速 USB 3.2 端口，在我们的测试中，数据传输速率达到了 347.2 MB/s，还支持有线图像输出。不过，用户只能选择镜像手机屏幕。

不出所料，这款智能手机不支持 microSD 卡，也没有音频插孔，但 UWB 功能也仍然不可用。

上图：麦克风（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
首页: 麦克风
左：操作按钮（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
左：操作按钮
右图：体积、功率（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
右：音量、功率
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡

软件 - vivo 智能手机可持续更新七年

vivo X300 Pro 预装了谷歌Android 16 和自己的 OriginOS 6 用户界面。在测试时，安全补丁是最新的，预计将分发七年（从市场推出开始）。不过，vivo 没有提供任何关于更新频率的信息。主要的Android 更新预计将提供五年。

vivo 手机还支持人工智能功能，包括图库中的图片编辑和视频的人工智能字幕。

可持续性

vivo X300 Pro 的包装在很大程度上没有使用塑料，但遗憾的是，设备本身是用塑料薄膜收缩包装的。

该公司提供的可持续发展信息并不是特别广泛，但至少有一些信息可供买家参考。这款手机 81% 可回收，包装上还列出了贵金属和稀土元素的使用量等信息。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - vivo X300 Pro 的三频全球导航卫星系统

vivo X300 Pro 支持所有现代移动通信标准的各种频率，在我们的测试中表现出稳定的连接。

现代 Wi-Fi 7 可用于无线局域网连接，包括快速的 6 GHz 频段，与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用可实现很高的传输速率。

Networking
Vivo X300 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
977 (min: 956) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
917 (min: 834) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1866 (min: 1793) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1806 (min: 1725) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
941 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1063 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1277 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1471 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
704 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
730 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1323 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼77%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Vivo X300 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1866 (1793-1912)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1720 (798-1853)
Vivo X300 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1802 (1725-1821)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1289-1530)
Vivo X300 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø977 (956-1008)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1806 (1767-1846)
Vivo X300 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø914 (834-973)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1468 (744-1523)
GPS 测试：室内
室内
GPS 测试：户外
户外活动

在卫星导航方面，这款手机具有全球所有网络的三频连接功能。在室内，如果没有蜂窝网络连接，卫星定位似乎无法正常工作；在室外，卫星定位仍然需要较长的时间，其准确性还有待提高。

在骑自行车时，我们将 vivo 智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。Vivo 在某些地方再次显示出微小的不足，因为它刷新位置的频率较低。不过，这不会对日常导航任务造成任何限制。

全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖路线
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖路线
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：城市
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：城市
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结

电话功能和通话质量

vivo X300 Pro 支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能。不过，在我们的测试中，Vo5G（Telekom）并不工作，我们在设置中也没有找到相关选项。这款智能手机支持双卡双待功能，可使用两张 nano SIM 卡或两张 eSIM 卡。用户还可以选择合并 SIM 卡类型。

将手机贴在耳边时，通话质量不错，但在交通噪音和其他类似情况下，环境噪音抑制功能就显得力不从心了。扬声器在安静的环境中工作良好，只有极少的回声。

摄像头 - vivo 的强大摄像头配置令人印象深刻

vivo X300 Pro 的自拍（肖像模式）
vivo X300 Pro 上的自拍照

vivo X300 Pro 的前置摄像头不仅拥有高分辨率并支持像素分档，而且还具有自动对焦功能。用这枚摄像头拍摄的照片构图均衡，即使在昏暗的光线条件下也能给人留下深刻印象。它能以高达 60 FPS 的速度录制超高清视频，包括杜比视界视频。图像防抖效果尤其出色。

手机背面有三个镜头。虽然 vivo 选择不使用 1 英寸传感器，但较小的索尼 LYT-828 仍能拍摄出清晰度均衡、色彩动态迷人的出色照片。在弱光环境下，X300 Pro 通过良好的算法和专用 VS1 图像芯片弥补了传感器尺寸的不足。

超广角镜头也带来了良好的效果，仅在照片边缘出现轻微畸变。这款智能手机的变焦功能令人印象深刻，即使在较高的数字范围内也能放大到 100 倍。如果您对它提供的质量还不满意，您可以使用可选的长焦变焦镜头，我们将在另一篇文章中对其进行测试。 我们将在另一篇文章中对其进行测试。

X300 Pro 的视频效果同样令人印象深刻。它可以录制 120 FPS 的 4K 或 30 FPS 的 8K，但后者不支持 HDR 或 LOG。不过，强大的云台防抖功能最高只能支持 2.8K（60 FPS）。传统的防抖功能虽然明显逊色，但还是不错的。其麦克风可进行低噪声录音。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light
orginal image
click to load images

在可控光照条件下，vivo X300 Pro 的色彩还原非常自然。我们注意到，深绿色的偏差最大（dE 7.05），手机摄像头稍微提亮了一点。

此外，它对测试图表的捕捉也非常出色，即使是精细的细节也依然清晰可见。虽然边缘有一些轻微的模糊和畸变，但这只是微妙的感觉。

ColorChecker
3.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X300 Pro: 3.99 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 7.05 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.7 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
15 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X300 Pro: 13.96 ∆E min: 7.17 - max: 25.26 ∆E

附件和保修 - 可选相机套件和长焦变焦器

vivo X300 Pro 不附带电源适配器，但配备了 USB 数据线（Type-A 至 Type-C）、SIM 卡工具和硅胶保护套。

vivo 还提供可选配件，包括成像手柄套件、长焦变焦器、90 瓦电源适配器和无线充电器（50 瓦）。

在本次测试的中欧地区，该设备享有 36 个月的保修服务。

配备手柄套件和远摄转换器的 X300 Pro（图片来源：Alex Wätzel）
配备手柄套装和远摄转换器的 X300 Pro
安装了远摄转换器的 X300 Pro（图片来源：Alex Wätzel）
安装了远摄转换器的 X300 Pro

输入设备和操作 - 配备超声波指纹传感器的 vivo 手机

vivo X300 Pro 的电容式触摸屏对输入的响应迅速而可靠。预装的保护膜非常漂亮和光滑，但下面的玻璃手感更好。

在生物识别安全方面，手机显示屏上安装了超声波指纹传感器，可以快速、可靠地识别存储的指纹。此外，用户还可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别，但安全性较低，只能用于解锁智能手机。

线性振动电机可提供细微、清晰的反馈，并可在设备设置中根据自己的需要进行定制。

显示屏 - vivo X300 Pro 采用明亮的 LTPO AMOLED 显示屏

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

手机的 6.78 英寸（17.22 厘米）LTPO AMOLED 显示屏可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间自动调节刷新率。支持所有常见的 HDR 标准，由于像素密度达到 453 PPI，内容显示清晰。

Vivo 预计其亮度可达 4,500 尼特。在显示纯白色表面时，我们在屏幕中央测得 1,574 cd/m²，而在显示较小的白色区域（APL18）时，X300 Pro 的亮度达到 2,329 cd/m²。在播放 HDR 视频时，我们在测试中测得的亮度高达 2,785 cd/m²。用户如果手动调节亮度，则可达到 612 cd/m²。

使用示波器，我们测得的基本闪烁频率约为 360 Hz。此外，vivo 还使用了频率为 2,083 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光技术，并将手机显示屏亮度设置为最低。这与平坦的振幅曲线一起，应有助于避免大多数人感到不适，但也不能完全排除敏感人群的不适。

1609
cd/m²		1563
cd/m²		1517
cd/m²
1603
cd/m²		1574
cd/m²		1500
cd/m²
1601
cd/m²		1571
cd/m²		1521
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1609 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1562.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.35 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1574 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
CCT: 6709 K
Vivo X300 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"		Oppo Find X9 Pro
LTPO AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"		Xiaomi 15 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Google Pixel 10 Pro
OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"		Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"		Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"
Screen
1%
-6%
36%
-13%
-42%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1574
1105
-30%
1041
-34%
2161
37%
1054
-33%
1357
-14%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1562
1084
-31%
1059
-32%
2198
41%
1059
-32%
1350
-14%
Brightness Distribution (%)
93
95
2%
96
3%
94
1%
93
0%
94
1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.02
22%
1
23%
0.7
46%
1.57
-21%
3.1
-138%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
2.32
14%
2.7
-0%
1.8
33%
2.8
-4%
4.7
-74%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
1.4
30%
1.9
5%
0.8
60%
1.7
15%
2.2
-10%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.244 98%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
2.32 95%
2 110%
CCT
6709 97%
6411 101%
6697 97%
6646 98%
6993 93%
6391 102%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3438 cd/m² +48%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3199 cd/m² +37%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2613 cd/m² +12%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2329 cd/m²
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3630 cd/m² +30%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3207 cd/m² +15%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2785 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2768 cd/m² -1%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 360 Hz
Amplitude: 14.29 %
Secondary Frequency: 2083 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8111 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

以固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置进行的系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这是由于缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

我们使用 Calman 来确定显示器的校准精度。在这种情况下，我们使用预设设置测得了最自然的结果，没有引起我们的批评，而且接近目标值。

灰度（色彩模式：自然，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式：自然，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（色彩模式：自然，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（色彩模式：自然，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：自然，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：自然，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.07 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5935 ms rise
↘ 0.476 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.07 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.487 ms rise
↘ 0.5785 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).

在户外，vivo X300 Pro 给人留下了很好的印象，即使在冬日的阳光下也能保持清晰易读。不过，其表面反光较强，这一点Galaxy S25 Ultra 做得更好。

户外活动
户外活动
户外活动
户外活动

AMOLED 显示屏的视角稳定性非常好。在任何时候都不会出现明显的色彩倒置现象，但在平视角度下面板会明显变暗。

vivo X300 Pro 的视角稳定性
vivo X300 Pro 的视角稳定性

性能 - X300 Pro 依靠 Dimensity 9500

vivo X300 Pro 采用联发科最新的顶级 SoC，即 密度 9500.它可以使用 16 GB 内存。

就性能而言，该 SoC 没有什么可隐瞒的，但它略微落后于 骁龙 8 精英 5 代在我们的测试中，当涉及到纯 CPU 性能时，它稍稍落后于骁龙 8 精英 5 代。该芯片组的系统和人工智能性能也是一流的，可确保系统始终流畅运行。

Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
3883 Points +9%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
3562 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (3508 - 3635, n=4)
3554 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
3511 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3200 Points -10%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3099 Points -13%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
2308 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=213, last 2 years)
1754 Points -51%
Multi-Core
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10615 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (10378 - 10941, n=4)
10585 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10378 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10020 Points -6%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
10017 Points -6%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9685 Points -9%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
6314 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=213, last 2 years)
5120 Points -52%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
3095982 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
2981365 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (2857236 - 3095982, n=3)
2978194 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
2629691 Points -15%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2534721 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2262067 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3269237, n=152, last 2 years)
1477713 Points -52%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
1338955 Points -57%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20764 Points +19%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18590 Points +6%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
17480 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
15738 Points -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (13954 - 17480, n=3)
15137 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=187, last 2 years)
14821 Points -15%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
13977 Points -20%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2354 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1898 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=126, last 2 years)
1143 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13325 Points +25%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11984 Points +13%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10756 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (10620 - 10756, n=3)
10707 Points +1%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10620 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
8446 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 16690, n=147, last 2 years)
7660 Points -28%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17171 Points +10%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
15639 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (15499 - 15639, n=3)
15564 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
15554 Points -1%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14292 Points -9%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
12881 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 21153, n=147, last 2 years)
11409 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
Memory
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
17503 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17355 Points +32%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
13155 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (8243 - 13155, n=3)
9921 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 24052, n=147, last 2 years)
8692 Points -34%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
8243 Points -37%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
7257 Points -45%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
Graphics
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
48863 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45562 Points +71%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
43358 Points +63%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (26660 - 48863, n=3)
41458 Points +56%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
30035 Points +13%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
26660 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=147, last 2 years)
25815 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2322 Points 0%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
2319 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (2105 - 2319, n=3)
2178 Points -6%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
2109 Points -9%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1901 Points -18%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
1813 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2468, n=147, last 2 years)
1700 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
23281 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=138, last 2 years)
19705 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19512 Points +1%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
19373 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (16866 - 19373, n=3)
17787 Points -8%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
17652 Points -9%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
16866 Points -13%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
37611 Points +2222%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=125, last 2 years)
27236 Points +1581%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2021 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1923 Points +19%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
1620 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (n=1)
1620 Points 0%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
1477 Points -9%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
5155 Points +603%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=57, last 2 years)
807 Points +10%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
733 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
478 Points -35%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (190 - 733, n=3)
372 Points -49%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
192 Points -74%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
36297 Points +4955%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=57, last 2 years)
3566 Points +397%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
907 Points +26%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
718 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (176 - 718, n=3)
358 Points -50%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
176 Points -75%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
48828 Points +2894%
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=57, last 2 years)
5138 Points +215%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
3792 Points +132%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
1631 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (432 - 1631, n=3)
833 Points -49%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
436 Points -73%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=42, last 2 years)
829 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
590 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
262 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
240 Points
Score V6
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
21660 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10818 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10621 Points -51%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  (765 - 21660, n=3)
7731 Points -64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 22149, n=75, last 2 years)
4874 Points -77%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
797 Points -96%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
765 Points -96%

ARM Mali-G1 MC 12 ARM Mali-G1 MC 12集成在 SoC 中的 ARM Mali-G1 MC 12 图形处理器支持基于硬件的光线追踪，并能与高通公司的 Adreno 840在我们的测试中，它甚至在某些基准测试中超过了高通公司的 Adreno 840。在这方面，X300 Pro 也提供了充足的动力。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7629 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7198 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6907 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
5959 Points -22%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5794 Points -24%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3232 Points -58%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7582 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7167 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6845 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6033 Points -20%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5809 Points -23%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3281 Points -57%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
26944 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26614 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
26375 Points -2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
25978 Points -4%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
21937 Points -19%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13193 Points -51%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
14869 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
14788 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12395 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
11776 Points -21%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
9972 Points -33%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
15420 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
14635 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12711 Points -18%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
12447 Points -19%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
10070 Points -35%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3208 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3198 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2588 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2397 Points -25%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2334 Points -27%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2334 (17.3min - 17.3max) Points -27%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1013 Points -68%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3253 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3211 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2679 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2651 Points -19%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2253 Points -31%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2253 (16.7min - 16.7max) Points -31%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1014 Points -69%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
954 fps +2%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
937 fps
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
748 fps -20%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
717 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps -24%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
406 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
606 fps +37%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps +7%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
441 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
418 fps -5%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
410 fps -7%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
282 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
369 fps +7%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
346 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
293 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
284 fps -18%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
282 fps -18%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps -40%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps -14%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
97 fps -20%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -51%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
207 fps +7%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
199 fps +3%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
193 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
179 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
161 fps -17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps -17%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
91 fps -25%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps -47%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
109 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps -11%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
106 fps -12%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
86 fps -28%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
367 fps
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
287 fps -22%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
259 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
247 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
237 fps -35%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
127 fps -65%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
62 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps -16%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
49 fps -21%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
48 fps -23%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
36.4 fps -41%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25 fps -60%

vivo X300 Pro 浏览网页非常流畅。在基准测试中，它只持续被 iPhone 17 Pro Max在这方面完全不同。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
358.295 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
315.056 Points +3%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
304.63 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
257.756 Points -15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (184.1 - 305, n=2)
244 Points -20%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
193.311 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=152, last 2 years)
155.8 Points -49%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
643 runs/min +29%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
500 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)
500 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
425 runs/min -15%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
390 runs/min -22%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
345 runs/min -31%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=126, last 2 years)
228 runs/min -54%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
42.8 runs/min +55%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
29.3 runs/min +6%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
27.6 runs/min
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
25 runs/min -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (17.9 - 27.6, n=2)
22.8 runs/min -17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
20.6 runs/min -25%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)
17.9 runs/min -35%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=125, last 2 years)
14.5 runs/min -47%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
306 Points +20%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
255 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
236 Points -7%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
177 Points -31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (129 - 255, n=3)
174 Points -32%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
171 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=147, last 2 years)
147 Points -42%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)
129 Points -49%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
121337 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
99202 Points +3%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
96438 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
84055 Points -13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (64064 - 96438, n=3)
78384 Points -19%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)
74649 Points -23%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
73424 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=199, last 2 years)
49087 Points -49%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=154, last 2 years)
1157 ms * -210%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
508.2 ms * -36%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)
503.8 ms * -35%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
472.5 ms * -26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (374 - 504, n=3)
458 ms * -23%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
376.8 ms * -1%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
373.8 ms *
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
256.9 ms * +31%

* ... smaller is better

名义上，X300 Pro 依靠的是目前最快的闪存--UFS 4.1。不过，基准测试显示其连续读取速度出奇地慢。不过，在日常使用中，存储速度仍然足够快，这一点应该不会引起注意。

Vivo X300 ProOppo Find X9 ProXiaomi 15 UltraGoogle Pixel 10 ProSamsung Galaxy S25 UltraAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-9%
38%
-29%
26%
33%
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
2041.82
3219.8
58%
4109.79
101%
1492.74
-27%
3823.28
87%
3709 ?(1954 - 4110, n=22)
82%
2213 ?(270 - 4370, n=194, last 2 years)
8%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
1981.85
1239.76
-37%
3761.19
90%
1353.55
-32%
3361.24
70%
3145 ?(1240 - 4035, n=22)
59%
1831 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=194, last 2 years)
-8%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
320.25
367.54
15%
312.69
-2%
264.44
-17%
287.85
-10%
374 ?(279 - 576, n=22)
17%
294 ?(47.6 - 576, n=194, last 2 years)
-8%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
593.74
176.98
-70%
379.29
-36%
347.84
-41%
331.61
-44%
429 ?(48.2 - 678, n=22)
-28%
333 ?(9.4 - 964, n=194, last 2 years)
-44%

游戏 - 游戏流畅度高达 120 FPS

vivo X300 Pro 配备了真正强大的 GPU，型号为 ARM Mali-G1 MC 12这就是为什么玩游戏完全没有问题，即使是在最高的细节设置下。

我们选择了两款游戏，然后使用GameBench 进行测试。.在运行《PUBG Mobile》时，智能手机的帧率基本保持一致，给人留下了深刻印象。如果降低细节设置，帧率最高可达 120 FPS，不过该设备无法持续保持这一帧率，会逐渐降至 90 FPS。在玩《英雄联盟》时，情况则有所不同，帧率完全稳定。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
可显示游戏菜单
游戏菜单
英雄联盟荒野大镖客
英雄联盟荒野大镖客
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Vivo X300 Pro; League of Legends: Wild Rift; High Definition: Ø119.9 (113-121)
Vivo X300 Pro; League of Legends: Wild Rift; max: Ø60 (56-61)
Vivo X300 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø107 (92-120)
Vivo X300 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (54-61)
Vivo X300 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (36-41)

排放--vivo X300 Pro 严重节流

温度

虽然手机表面温度在日常使用中并无大碍，但在使用 "Burnout "基准模拟连续负载的某些情况下，手机表面温度急剧上升，最高温度达 47.6 °C。虽然温度很高，但不会对用户造成任何影响。

不过，在 3DMark 压力测试中，vivo X300 Pro 显示出废热的散热效果根本不够好。它的性能损失很大，这意味着 Galaxy S25 Ultra尽管采用了较早一代的芯片，但速度还是略胜一筹。

Max. Load
 47.3 °C47.6 °C44.6 °C 
 46.1 °C47.6 °C44.2 °C 
 45.9 °C47.5 °C42.7 °C 
Maximum: 47.6 °C
Average: 45.9 °C
43.4 °C43.5 °C41.9 °C
42.5 °C44.2 °C44.5 °C
42.2 °C43.8 °C43 °C
Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 43.2 °C
Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
99.8 % +91%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
99.6 % +90%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.2 % +55%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
63 % +20%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.9 % +5%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
52.3 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.7 % +76%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
71.8 % +43%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
67.6 % +34%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.3 % +4%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50.3 %
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
38.7 % -23%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
72.6 % +47%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
66.6 % +35%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 % 0%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
49.5 %
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
20.6 % -58%
Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
64.8 %
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
63.5 % -2%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.3 % +107%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
65 % +38%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
64.7 % +38%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.6 % +8%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
47 %
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
42.4 % -10%
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø27.3 (21.9-43.5)
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø32 (16.9-43.6)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø25 (22.7-31.7)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (21.9-41.9)
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø88.6 (69.3-132.4)
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø77.9 (77.8-78.1)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60 (59.9-60)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø91 (76-138.4)
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø29.1 (23.9-48.2)
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø31.5 (10.5-51)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø29.3 (26.6-36.7)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø26 (19.8-39.8)
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø14 (11-23.3)
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø18.5 (9.82-23.1)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.2 (12.6-19.5)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.4 (10-19.8)
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 1.0.3.6: Ø7.21 (6.05-9.34)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø10.6 (9.46-14.9)

发言人

vivo X300 Pro 的两个扬声器音质不错，但随着音量的增大，它们的声音开始变得尖锐，而且有些不平衡。在这个价格范围内，这种情况确实应该得到改善。

此外，还可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙输出声音。遗憾的是，vivo 没有提供任何有关后者支持哪些编解码器的信息。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.437.82528.636.23121.237.44026.940.15037.444.86321.940.38017.641.510018.839.512517.143.816015.453.520014.456.12501260.931510.961.540010.961.850010.167.463010.768.380010.673.3100011.676.9125012.378.9160011.279.6200012.181.5250012.282.6315012.581.8400012.682.7500012.982.8630013.278.4800013.274.61000013.569.81250013.665.81600013.359.9SPL24.591.8N0.587.6median 12.5median 73.3Delta1.49.638.443.230.640.119.240.421.539.636.944.224.447.719.746.315.84714.150.615.260.112.459.29.560.99.763.410.566.4970.29.873.98.976.69.479.711.579.211.278.31283.911.783.41282.31282.912.58312.981.113.38013.578.613.569.513.665.623.9930.598.2median 12median 78.31.58.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo X300 ProSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo X300 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 适用于欧洲地区的小型电池

耗电量

在最大显示亮度下，vivo X300 Pro 的功耗略高，在负载情况下会变得相当贪婪。不过，在调整显示亮度时，它的功耗略低于使用相同 SoC 的 Find X9 Pro。

5440 毫安时电池适用于欧盟国家的机型；在其他国家，它可能配备更大的 6510 毫安时电池。它支持高达 90 瓦的有线充电和高达 40 瓦的无线充电。遗憾的是，我们在测试过程中没有合适的电源适配器，因此使用了摩托罗拉提供的 125 瓦充电器（USB-PD 3.0）。使用这款充电器，我们只用了 40 分钟就充满了电量（50%：16 分钟，80%：28 分钟）。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.09 / 0.12 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.86 / 1.8 / 1.86 Watt
Load midlight 10.63 / 21.99 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Vivo X300 Pro
5440 mAh		Oppo Find X9 Pro
7500 mAh		Xiaomi 15 Ultra
5410 mAh		Google Pixel 10 Pro
4870 mAh		Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
4823 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
37%
44%
5%
36%
28%
12%
23%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.86
0.6
30%
0.49
43%
1.01
-17%
0.6
30%
0.55
36%
0.815 ?(0.6 - 1.2, n=4)
5%
0.848 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=166, last 2 years)
1%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.8
1
44%
0.87
52%
1.65
8%
1.3
28%
0.77
57%
1.655 ?(1 - 2.02, n=4)
8%
1.434 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=166, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.86
1.3
30%
0.94
49%
2.05
-10%
1.6
14%
0.91
51%
1.935 ?(1.3 - 2.5, n=4)
-4%
1.618 ?(0.77 - 4.46, n=166, last 2 years)
13%
Load Average * (Watt)
10.63
6.9
35%
8.82
17%
7.25
32%
4.1
61%
13.81
-30%
8.48 ?(6.9 - 10.6, n=3)
20%
7.01 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=143, last 2 years)
34%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
21.99
11.9
46%
9.26
58%
19.78
10%
11.5
48%
16.69
24%
15.4 ?(11.9 - 22, n=3)
30%
11.3 ?(3.53 - 22, n=143, last 2 years)
49%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.69 (0.09289-15.2)
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.47 (0.883-11.9)
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.117 (1.048-1.805)
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.772 (0.63-1.05)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.8 (10.6-10.9)
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.6 (11.4-11.7)
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.117 (1.048-1.805)
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.772 (0.63-1.05)

运行时间

在调整显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）的情况下，vivo X300 Pro 在 Wi-Fi 测试中取得了不错的成绩，运行时间略低于 18 小时。不过，考虑到其电池容量，我们本以为在这种情况下会有更高的表现。

它在负载情况下的高耗电量也反映在我们的测试中，因为这款智能手机在这里甚至连三个小时都没能坚持下来。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 142)
17h 51min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 52min
Vivo X300 Pro
5440 mAh		Oppo Find X9 Pro
7500 mAh		Xiaomi 15 Ultra
5410 mAh		Google Pixel 10 Pro
4870 mAh		Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
4823 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
Battery runtime
82%
20%
16%
60%
26%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
17.9
34.3
92%
21.2
18%
21.1
18%
28.6
60%
22.2
24%
Load (h)
2.9
5
72%
3.5
21%
3.3
14%
3.7
28%
Reader / Idle (h)
65.6
44.8
33.1
45.8

Notebookcheck 总评分

vivo X300 Pro 评测（图片来源：Alex Wätzel）
vivo X300 Pro 评测

vivo X300 Pro 是一款价格昂贵的旗舰拍照手机，拥有众多高端功能，但由于发热、节流、扬声器效果一般、GNSS 精度存在小瑕疵以及运行时间一般，它未能达到自己的标准。

Vivo X300 Pro - 12/11/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
67 / 69 → 97%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
39 / 55 → 71%
Application Performance
84 / 85 → 98%
AI Performance
46%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
90%
Average
72%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
96.7%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
93.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 59.2%

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
88.1%
Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘
Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $6.91
MAOUICI Tempered Glass for V...
2. $7.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ...
3. $6.91
MAOUICI Tempered Glass for V...
List Price: 1399€		226 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.78"
2800x1260
453 PPI
AMOLED
2.
87.7%
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘
Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $7.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ...
2. $9.99
UYRUREL Case for Oppo Find X...
3. $17.45
RJTSLDOV For OPPO Find X9 Pr...
List Price: 1299€		224 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.78"
2772x1272
450 PPI
LTPO AMOLED
3.
89.5%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $11.99
Ibywind for Xiaomi 15 Ultra ...
2. $9.29
Zeking [2 Pack for Xiaomi 15...
3. $26.68
INIU Mini Portable Charger, ...
List Price: 1499€		229 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.73"
3200x1440
521 PPI
AMOLED
4.
88.9%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5 ⎘
IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon: $849.00
List Price: 1199€		207 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.30"
2856x1280
497 PPI
OLED
5.
89.2%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro ⎘
Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe		Amazon:
1. $48.00
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Sili...
2. $8.99
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
3. $39.99
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Sili...
List Price: 1449 Euro		233 g256 GB NVMe6.90"
2868x1320
460 PPI
OLED
6.
89.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $1,093.67
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra, 25...
2. $915.00
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-...
3. $1,119.00
Samsung Galaxy ​S25 Ultra ...
List Price: 1449€		218 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"
3120x1440
498 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X

More articles related to this device

Vivo X300 Pro (X300 Series)
News
•
vivo X300 Pro：相机王牌与小缺点评测
|
News
•
在欧洲以外地区，全球版 vivo X300 Pro 价格更低，电池容量更大：进口选择
|
Magazine
•
vivo X300 Pro：使用全新蔡司相机和 200 毫米长焦扩展器拍摄的维也纳照片
|
News
•
Zeiss camera of the compact Vivo X300 outclasses Galaxy S25 Ultra despite s...
|
News
•
vivo X300 Pro 和小巧型 vivo X300 的欧洲发布日期正式确定
|
News
•
以更低的价格进口 vivo X300 Pro：国际买家的价格和选择
|
News
•
vivo X300 Pro：上手视频揭示欧洲机型的电池容量，蔡司相机与 vivo X200 Ultra 的对比
|
News
•
vivo X300 Pro：蔡司相机最终样张和规格在发布前曝光，传闻 vivo X300 将成为 X200 Pro Mini 的紧凑型替代品
|
News
•
相似但不相同：小米 17 Pro Max、vivo X300 Pro、Honor Magic8 Pro 和 Oppo Find X9 Pro 的相机规格
|
News
•
vivo X300 Pro 上手和测试视频确认规格，新蔡司相机样张发布
|
News
•
小米 16 Ultra vs. OPPO Find X9 Ultra vs. Vivo X300 Ultra：徕卡-哈苏-蔡司夹式镜头大战一触即发
|
News
•
vivo X300 Pro：发布首张蔡司长焦相机样张并预告更多相机规格
|
News
•
vivo X300 Ultra 将成为首款也是唯一一款双 200 万像素摄像头旗舰机
|
News
•
小米 16 vs. OPPO Find X9 vs. Vivo X300 vs.Honor Magic 8：不同的摄像头设计，一个共同特征
|
News
•
vivo X200 Ultra 的继任者可能配备索尼 Xperia 1 独家相机功能

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > vivo X300 Pro 不仅仅是不寻常的相机设置--vivo X300 Pro 评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-12-15 (Update: 2025-12-15)