对Honor Magic V6的评测结论
Honor Magic V6 号称是最好的折叠屏智能手机。从许多方面来看，它确实名副其实。不过，与前代机型 Magic V5 相比，其变化并非在每个方面都十分明显。 例如，摄像头的改进主要体现在软件层面和图像信号处理器（ISP）上，而显示屏方面唯一明显的变化仅出现在外屏上。特别是，可折叠显示屏的亮度本可以进一步提升，以便在阳光明媚的日子里更清晰地阅读。
但在电池方面，Honor 可谓倾尽全力，提供了折叠屏手机中最大的电池容量。虽然本文测试的全球版电池容量为6,660 mAh，但中国市场的部分机型甚至高达7,150 mAh。无论哪种情况，这都令人印象深刻，尤其是考虑到V6纤薄的设计。 截至目前，Honor 折叠手机也是唯一一款获得完整IP69认证的机型。
Magic V6 还支持有线和无线快充功能，进一步完善了其功能。 据称，其电池续航时间也比竞品更长。此外，它还配备了内置红外发射器以及一个支持桌面模式的高速USB接口。两块屏幕均兼容主动式触控笔，不过该触控笔需单独购买，且目前功能尚有限。
在测试中，Magic V6 展现了敏捷的系统性能，并具备支持官方承诺的七年系统更新的强大配置。不过，纤薄的设计似乎给 SoC 的散热带来了挑战，因为并非所有的 3DMark 压力测试都能完成——部分测试因过热而中断。 不过，到目前为止，这并未对日常使用造成负面影响。Honor 将内屏的折痕处理得略微平坦了一些，但折痕依然明显且清晰可见。相比之下，OPPO在Find N6上对此的处理要好得多。
Pros
Cons
价格和供货情况
Honor Magic V6 可直接从Honor处直接购买。
- HONOR Magic V6 5G PNM-N49 (GSM Unlocked, International Version) 512GB Storage 16GB RAM Factory Unlocked Android 16 Foldable Smartphone (Red)
- $1,590.00Honor Magic V5 5G MBH-N49 (GSM, International Version) Folding Screen | 512GB Storage 16GB RAM Dual-SIM Factory Unlocked Android 15 Smartphone (Black)
- $1,500.00Honor Magic V5 5G MBH-N49 (GSM, International Version) Folding Screen | 512GB Storage 16GB RAM Dual-SIM Factory Unlocked Android 15 Smartphone (Dawn Gold)
规格：Honor Magic V6
机身与功能——与 iPhone 17 Pro Max 同样厚
自去年以来，折叠屏手机已不再是笨重的“巨无霸”；相反，几乎所有机型都已实现与传统智能手机相比不再存在厚度限制的水平。Honor 正推动着这一发展及其伴随而来的小型化进程，使得Magic V6成为市场上最薄的智能手机——前提是你选择白色款。 折叠后，它的厚度仅与 iPhone 17 Pro Max，展开后厚度仅为4.0毫米。其做工令人印象深刻，这款折叠手机依然给人以坚固耐用的感觉。我们测试的红色机型还具有丝绒般的触感。
其功能配置几乎无可挑剔。两块屏幕均支持选配触控笔输入，高速 USB 接口可处理显示输出，包括桌面模式。此外，Magic V6 是唯一通过 IP69 认证的折叠屏手机。唯一缺憾是缺少 UWB 功能。
通信功能——支持 Wi-Fi 7 和 5G 的折叠屏手机
将Honor Magic V6贴近耳朵时，通话音质非常出色，声音传输自然。它对环境噪音的抑制效果也很好；只有在街道噪音很大的情况下，才会偶尔有部分噪音渗入，且用户的声音会显得有些闷。
该设备支持所有现代无线通信标准；在我们的测试中，V6在6 GHz频段接收信号时的传输速率仅略有下降。我们将在更新后再次进行验证。
| Networking | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
摄像头——Magic V6 搭载的三款多功能摄像头
从规格上看，相机配置没有明显变化；只有超广角传感器的光圈略小一些，为f/2.2，相比 Magic V5 （f/2.0）稍小，但实际使用中并无明显差异。
Magic V6 凭借出色且灵活的摄像头配置令人印象深刻，变焦时还得到了 AI 的额外支持。在极端焦距下，成像效果更像画作而非照片，但在 30 倍放大时，这种效果反而能带来更好的成像效果。
在视频拍摄方面，这款Honor 折叠屏手机同样提供了出色的画质，不过遗憾的是它缺少Pro模式。此外，超过60 FPS的帧率仅在慢动作模式下支持（仅限120或240 FPS的全高清分辨率）。在超级夜景模式下拍摄的用户也可以选择24 FPS。
| 宽高比 | 分辨率 | |
|---|---|---|
| 照片 | 4:3 / 16:9 / 1:1 / 全屏 | 12 / 50 MPix |
| 视频（主摄像头） | 16:9 / 21:9 | HD（30 / 60 FPS）全高清（30 / 60 FPS）超高清（30 / 60 FPS） |
| 视频（前置摄像头） | 16:9 / 21:9 | 高清 (30 FPS)全高清 (30 / 60 FPS)超高清 (30 FPS) |
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
可折叠显示屏——5,000尼特，但如果能更亮一些就更好了
Honor Magic V6的显示屏与前代产品相比几乎没有变化，但在我们的测试中，其亮度显著超过了5,000 cd/m²的额定峰值亮度。不过，由于该亮度仅在播放HDR内容时才能达到，因此在户外使用时几乎没有实际意义。 在此情况下，APL18值更为重要，而V6的这一数值相对较低，在日常使用中也能明显察觉。
Magic V6的护眼功能值得称道，其中包括高频PWM调光技术，可最大限度地减轻眼睛敏感人群的不适感。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1291 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
CCT: 6804 K
| Honor Magic V6 OLED, 2352x2172, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2184x1968, 8" | Huawei Mate X7 OLED, 2416x2210, 8" | Oppo Find N6 OLED, 2480x2248, 8.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 28% | -28% | -31% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1229 | 2570 109% | 1467 19% | 1353 10% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 5773 | 2708 -53% | 1496 -74% | 1697 -71% |
| Response Times | -20% | -8% | 0% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.65 ? | 0.67 ? -3% | 0.71 ? -9% | 0.52 ? 20% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.84 ? | 1.4 ? -67% | 0.93 ? -11% | 1.05 ? -25% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 120 | 240 | 360 | 180 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 15.15 | 13.73 9% | 15.59 -3% | 14.43 5% |
| Screen | -15% | -1% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1291 | 1311 2% | 1005 -22% | 1179 -9% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 2.4 -71% | 1.4 -0% | 1.6 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.5 | 3.4 3% | 3.1 11% | 2.9 17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.2 8% | 2.2 8% | 1.6 33% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.03 108% | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6804 96% | 6413 101% | 6890 94% | 6662 98% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1307 | 1021 | 1184 | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 97 | 98 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-7% | -12% /
-9% | -8% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 15.15 % Secondary Frequency: 4347 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7775 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列（在最低亮度下，振幅曲线看起来很平坦，但这是由于缩放比例造成的。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.84 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4475 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.394 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.321 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3245 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
封面显示屏——更亮
在屏幕方面，Honor 再次全面提升了亮度，在APL18测试中达到了2,505 cd/m²的出色数值；据称其HDR亮度最高可达6,000 cd/m²，不过我们在测试中未能从这款智能手机上完全压榨出如此高的亮度。
该屏幕还支持 4,320 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光。
| Honor Magic V6 OLED, 2420x1080, 6.5" | Oppo Find N6 OLED, 2616x1140, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2520x1080, 6.5" | Huawei Mate X7 OLED, 2444x1080, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||||
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1909 | 1180 | 1348 | 1572 |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.1 |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 3.1 |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 4.1 |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.26 97% | 2.04 108% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6747 96% | 6710 97% | 6461 101% | 6980 93% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1175 | 1346 | 1570 | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 97 | 94 | 96 |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
性能、排放和电池续航时间
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 - 480, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | Huawei Mate X7 | Oppo Find N6 | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -34% | 22% | -2% | -13% | -42% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3921.41 | 4080.35 4% | 4365.76 11% | 3861.06 -2% | 3642 ? -7% | 2244 ? -43% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3992.25 | 2239.55 -44% | 4112.78 3% | 3531.83 -12% | 3184 ? -20% | 1926 ? -52% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 411.38 | 403.69 -2% | 463.43 13% | 446.52 9% | 413 ? 0% | 310 ? -25% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 667.68 | 51.23 -92% | 1071.05 60% | 637.68 -4% | 496 ? -26% | 362 ? -46% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
Honor Magic V6 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.14 / 0.36 Watt |
| Idle |  0.92 / 1.39 / 1.53 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Honor Magic V6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
| Huawei Mate X7 | |
| Oppo Find N6 | |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
Honor Magic V6 作为一款超薄、配置卓越的折叠屏手机，凭借强劲的电池续航、多功能摄像头以及出色的日常使用表现脱颖而出；然而，在内屏亮度、高负载下的散热表现方面仍存在一些不足，且与前代机型相比，改进幅度仅属一般。
Honor Magic V6
- 07/02/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 替代方案一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 88.1%  | Honor Magic V6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. HONOR Magic V6 5G PNM-N49 (G... 2. $1,590.00 Honor Magic V5 5... 3. $1,500.00 Honor Magic V5 5... List Price: 2300€ | 224 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 7.95" 2352x2172 403 PPI OLED |
2. 87.2%  | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 2099€ | 215 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.00" 2184x1968 367 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
3. 84.5%  | Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 935 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 2099€ | 236 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 8.00" 2416x2210 409 PPI OLED |
4. 86.4%  | Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: | 225 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 8.12" 2480x2248 412 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
