三星Galaxy S25 Edge 的评价
当然,对于是否有必要使用Galaxy S25 Edge 这样纤薄的智能手机,众说纷纭。同样显而易见的是,这款厚度仅为 5.8 毫米的候选机型由于采用了纤薄的钛金属外壳,其电池容量是Galaxy S 系列中最小的,这也引发了人们对电池续航时间的担忧。Galaxy S25 Edge 的出色电池性能仅次于Galaxy S25,它证明了在日常使用中,小电池完全不是问题。不过,对于这个价位的智能手机来说,充电时间并不是特别突出。
Galaxy S25 Edge 需要在摄像头方面做出妥协。虽然它的图像和视频质量与Galaxy S 兄弟姐妹大致相当,但空间限制意味着它缺少一个长焦镜头。这使得这款智能手机主要适用于很少使用变焦功能的用户。Galaxy 的七年更新、骁龙 8 精英版和明亮的 LTPO AMOLED 面板等优势都有利于Galaxy S25 Edge。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
256 GB 版本的三星Galaxy S25 Edge售价 1099 美元。在三星在线商店上的售价为 1,099 美元。
Table of Contents
- 三星Galaxy S25 Edge 的评价
- 规格
- 表壳 -Galaxy S25 Edge 采用坚固的钛金属表壳
- 功能 -Galaxy S25 Edge 配备 WiFi 7、双 eSIM 卡和 UWB。
- 软件 - 人工智能集成和 7 年更新,直至 2031 年
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 和良好的全球定位系统
- 电话功能和语音质量
- 摄像头 - 200 万像素双摄像头,缺少长焦镜头
- 配件和保修 - 24 个月保修和可选 Care+ 保险
- 输入设备和操作 - 只需按下按钮,即可使用人工智能助手
- 显示屏 -Galaxy S25 Edge 配备 QHD+ 和快速 120 Hz LTPO AMOLED 显示屏
- 性能 -Galaxy S25 Edge 配备了 Snapdragon 8 Elite 处理器,可提供出色的性能。Galaxy
- 游戏 - 三星智能手机可达到 120fps 的速度,如果你允许的话
- 排放 - 良好的立体声扬声器和 Auracast 支持
- 电池续航时间 - 尽管电池容量小,但续航能力惊人
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
- 可能的替代品比较
纤薄智能手机是一种时尚,而Galaxy S25 Edge 正是三星推出的一款符合这一要求的Galaxy S25 机型。Galaxy S25 Edge 超薄,厚度仅为 5.8 毫米,是Apple iPhone 17 Air 的竞争对手,据网络传言,iPhone 17 Air 的厚度将为 5.5 毫米。
规格
表壳 -Galaxy S25 Edge 采用坚固的钛金属表壳
您需要一款轻薄的智能手机吗?拿起做工精良的Galaxy S25 Edge,你会立刻回答 "是的"。这款 6.7 英寸的设备仅重 163 克,感觉非常轻巧,几乎让所有重量超过 210 克的同类设备看起来都像重量级产品。
背面的摄像头凸起仅有不到 4 毫米,非常突出。如果把镜头的高度计算在内,Galaxy S25 Edge 的厚度几乎与 Galaxy S25+.在没有保护套的情况下,放在桌子上时,智能手机会前后摇晃得很厉害。
就像 Galaxy S25和Galaxy S25+一样,Galaxy S25 Edge 的背面由大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 保护。而 LPTO AMOLED 面板则由大猩猩陶瓷玻璃 2 保护。 Galaxy S25 UltraS25 Edge 的边框由钛金属而非铝金属制成,从而确保通过 IP68 认证的Galaxy S25 Edge 非常坚固耐用。压力和扭转测试没有对我们的评测设备造成任何伤害。
三星为Galaxy S25 Edge 提供三种哑光颜色款式。我们的评测机有钛银色、冰蓝色和黑色。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
功能 -Galaxy S25 Edge 配备 WiFi 7、双 eSIM 卡和 UWB。
Galaxy S25 Edge 有两种存储版本,均内置 12 GB 内存。存储容量为 256 GB 的售价为 1099 美元,存储容量为 512 GB 的售价为 1219 美元。
除了 Wi-Fi 7、蓝牙 5.4、NFC、UWB 和双 SIM/eSIM 卡之外,Galaxy S25 Edge 还配备了一个快速 USB-C 端口(与三星便携式固态硬盘 T7 搭配使用,速度可达 399 MB/s),支持有线视频输出。如果通过 HDMI 适配器将手机连接到显示器,就可以使用可选的三星 DeX 桌面模式。
软件 - 人工智能集成和 7 年更新,直至 2031 年
Galaxy S25 Edge 运行Android 15 和 OneUI 7.0。与Galaxy S25 系列的其他智能手机一样,它将在七年内接受更新。Android 安全补丁预计将每月推出https://security.samsungmobile.com/workScope.smsb.在测试过程中,安全补丁更新到了 2025 年 5 月,使其如约成为最新版本。
OneUI 7.0 扩展了Galaxy S24 系列推出的人工智能功能。在人工智能代理的帮助下,它们更深入地嵌入到操作系统中,并可跨应用程序工作。我们的 Galaxy S25 Ultra概述了新的人工智能功能。
可持续性
Galaxy S25 Edge 使用了大量回收材料,包括铝、玻璃、金、钴、铜和钢。包装由再生纸制成,不含塑料。提供备件、自修工具包和维修说明。
在其可持续发展报告中(,2024 年版可在此查阅)中,三星提供了有关其环保工作的信息。在其网站上,制造商还提供了有关其设备的 O₂ 足迹的信息。.Galaxy S25 Edge 的数据尚未公布。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 和良好的全球定位系统
Galaxy 25 Edge 支持所有主要移动频率以及最快的 Wi-Fi 标准 Wi-Fi 7。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 连接后,它在 5 GHz 频段的传输速度始终稳定在近 900 Mbps,在 6 GHz 频段则高达 1,870 Mbps。
Networking | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
电话功能和语音质量
Galaxy S25 Edge 可容纳两张 nano-SIM 卡。此外,还可以激活两张 eSIM 卡,也可以将 nano-SIM 卡和 eSIM 卡组合使用。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话,以及人工智能辅助实时翻译。
三星手机以其良好的语音质量获得了高度评价。在固定电话和移动网络上,只要声音不是太大,我们的声音都能自然清晰地传递给通话者,并有效过滤背景噪音。
摄像头 - 200 万像素双摄像头,缺少长焦镜头
与其他Galaxy S25 智能手机不同,由于空间限制,Galaxy S25 Edge 没有采用三摄像头设置,而是主摄像头和超广角摄像头双摄像头。前置摄像头为 1200 万像素自动对焦摄像头,日光下自拍效果不错。它能以每秒 60 帧的速度录制高达 4K 的视频。
而超广角摄像头只能使用 1200 万像素,就像 Galaxy S25 Ultra一样,超广角摄像头也只有 1200 万像素。尽管机身纤薄,但它也使用了 1/1.3 英寸传感器。主摄像头通过像素二进制将照片缩小到 1200 万像素,但也可以保存为 5000 万像素或 200 万像素。视频录制最高可达 30fps 的 8K。最高可达 4K 和 60fps,拍摄时可在主摄像头和超广角摄像头之间切换。
在不变焦和低变焦的情况下(通过传感器裁剪以数字方式实现),主摄像头拍摄的照片非常漂亮,具有出色的动态范围、丰富的细节和自然的色彩。在光线条件良好的情况下,拍摄质量与 Galaxy S25.Galaxy S25 Edge 的夜景拍摄效果更好,这要归功于其更大的传感器。变焦水平超过 2 倍后,图像清晰度会迅速下降,相应的拍摄效果也无法与Galaxy S25 的长焦镜头相媲美。
超广角摄像头在其能力范围内也表现出色。它采用了与主摄像头类似的色彩校准,但在细节方面却无法与主摄像头相提并论。这在图像边缘尤为明显,经常出现冲淡的情况。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Daylight imageDaylight imageUltra-wide-angle5x zoomLowlight image在受控的照明条件下,主摄像头可以非常准确地再现色彩。即使在 1 勒克斯的残余光线下,测试图也清晰可见。


配件和保修 - 24 个月保修和可选 Care+ 保险
Galaxy S25 Edge 仅随附一条 USB-C 连接线和一个 SIM 卡工具。其他配件可在三星在线商店购买,包括兼容的 25 瓦电源适配器,如EP-T2510N(售价约 25 美元)。
Galaxy S25 Edge 提供 24 个月的保修服务。可选Samsung Care+ 延长保修期。保险套餐。该保险可为您的智能手机提供长达两年的防盗和意外损坏保护。根据保险期限和范围的不同,Care+ 的价格在 149 美元到 269 美元之间。
输入设备和操作 - 只需按下按钮,即可使用人工智能助手
显示屏 -Galaxy S25 Edge 配备 QHD+ 和快速 120 Hz LTPO AMOLED 显示屏
LTPO AMOLED 面板可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态、持续地调整刷新率,通过 3,120 x 1,440 像素的 1440p 分辨率实现锐利的图像。默认分辨率为 1080p(2,340 x 1,080 像素),在节省电池寿命的同时,图像清晰度也不会大打折扣。
在全屏白色显示屏上,AMOLED 面板的平均亮度达到 1,371 cd/m²,与Galaxy S25 的亮度差不多。对于较小的图像部分(APL18),屏幕亮度增加到强大的 2,714 cd/m²,在 HDR 模式下,达到 2,875 cd/m² 的峰值。
AMOLED 面板在最低亮度下的闪烁频率相对较低,为 240 Hz。该显示屏没有高频 PWM 调光功能,但随着亮度的增加,其频率最高可达 480 Hz。不过,振幅并不特别平缓,因此对 PWM 闪烁敏感的人即使在显示屏亮度很高的情况下也可能会出现问题。
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1399 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.84
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.01
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Super Retina XDR OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9" | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL OLED, 2992x1344, 6.8" | Honor Magic7 Pro OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 5% | 54% | 33% | 6% | |
Brightness middle | 1399 | 1055 -25% | 2148 54% | 1607 15% | 1357 -3% |
Brightness | 1371 | 1061 -23% | 2050 50% | 1609 17% | 1350 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 93 -1% | 86 -9% | 95 1% | 94 0% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 1.5 62% | 0.5 87% | 0.9 77% | 3.1 21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.3 | 4.7 25% | 1.4 78% | 1.8 71% | 4.7 25% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 2.3 -10% | 0.8 62% | 1.7 19% | 2.2 -5% |
Gamma | 2.01 109% | 2.21 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 2 110% |
CCT | 6506 100% | 6625 98% | 6582 99% | 6346 102% | 6391 102% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 23.91 % Secondary Frequency: 480 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8363 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
以固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.707 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6155 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.76 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.412 ms rise | |
↘ 0.347 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
性能 -Galaxy S25 Edge 配备了 Snapdragon 8 Elite 处理器,可提供出色的性能。Galaxy
Galaxy S25 系列的每款智能手机都内置了目前速度最快的Android SoC,即 骁龙8精英版Galaxy.与 骁龙 8 精英forGalaxy"版本相比,主内核、GPU 和 NPU 的时钟频率略高。
不出所料,Galaxy S25 Edge 在 CPU 性能方面处于领先地位。它只比 Apple A18 Pro中的 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max在 Geekbench 6.4 和 AImark 测试中,S25 Edge 的性能超过了评测机型。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (21837 - 23281, n=4) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years) |
配备了 Adreno 830图形芯片,Galaxy S25 Edge 在 GPU 基准测试中也名列前茅。但它并不总是第一名,这可能是由于热降频的缘故。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
在浏览器基准测试中,Apple 智能手机继续树立基准。尽管Galaxy S25 Edge 不得不让位于 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max的速度几乎没有减慢,甚至在速度计 2.0 中从Apple 手机手中夺走了第一名的位置。
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (236 - 334, n=4) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=165, last 2 years) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (425 - 585, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=144, last 2 years) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (29 - 31.6, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=101, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (236 - 244, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=156, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (95809 - 99202, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (Chrome 129) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=212, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (377 - 389, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) |
* ... smaller is better
快速的 UFS 4.0 存储可确保极短的加载时间,但在随机写入访问 4 KB 数据块时速度稍慢。
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Honor Magic7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -9% | 24% | 17% | 25% | -13% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3907.51 | 1850.5 -53% | 3910.81 0% | 3823.28 -2% | 3711 ? -5% | 2082 ? -47% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 2285.66 | 1280.56 -44% | 3683.81 61% | 3361.24 47% | 2724 ? 19% | 1687 ? -26% |
Random Read 4KB | 431.86 | 310.88 -28% | 282.34 -35% | 287.85 -33% | 385 ? -11% | 288 ? -33% |
Random Write 4KB | 210.99 | 398.27 89% | 357.04 69% | 331.61 57% | 413 ? 96% | 330 ? 56% |
游戏 - 三星智能手机可达到 120fps 的速度,如果你允许的话
配备 Adreno 830图形处理器,即使在全图形细节下也能保证最高帧率。在测试中,我们以最大显示分辨率(QHD+,3,120 x 1,440 像素)运行游戏基准测试,将这一优势发挥到了极致。游戏基准结果表明,Galaxy S25 Edge 仍有充足的储备。
在最高细节级别下,《源氏冲击》的运行帧数稳定在每秒 60 帧,而《PUBG Mobile》在超高清下的平均帧数为每秒 40 帧。如果这两款游戏没有内部 FPS 限制,智能手机的性能可能会大幅提升。不过,在最低图形设置下,《PUBG Mobile》会释放手刹,让Galaxy S25 Edge 显示每秒 120 帧的最高帧率。
排放 - 良好的立体声扬声器和 Auracast 支持
温度
Galaxy S25 Edge 的表面温度非常安全,在我们的测试中,即使在连续负载的情况下,温度也不会超过 44.9°C。
由于机身纤薄,这款智能手机在 3DMark 压力测试中受到很大影响,在基准测试中,SoC 的性能下降到原来的一半左右。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge |
发言人
立体声扬声器在低音量和中等音量时能产生均衡的声音,但随着音量的增大,声音会变得越来越薄。对于这样一款轻薄的智能手机来说,扬声器的整体表现非常不错。
Galaxy S25 Edge 只支持 SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和 SSC 几种蓝牙编解码器。不过,它支持蓝牙 Auracast,因此可以作为其他兼容设备的音源。USB-C 端口可用于有线音频输出。
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 尽管电池容量小,但续航能力惊人
耗电量
从纸面上看,Galaxy S25 Edge 的电池规格并不出众。电池容量为 3,900 mAh,比 S25 Edge 的电池容量还要小。 Galaxy S25(4,000 mAh),有线充电上限为 25 瓦。无线充电的最高功率为 15 瓦。这款智能手机相当节能,尽管在负载情况下可能会有相当高的要求。
充电时,我们使用了 100 瓦的 Anker 317 电源适配器。正如三星在Galaxy S25 Edge 数据表中所述,在我们的测试中,30 分钟后电池电量达到 55%。48 分钟后,电池电量达到 80%,完全充电周期为 1 小时 20 分钟。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3900 mAh | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4685 mAh | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5060 mAh | Honor Magic7 Pro 5270 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 13% | -25% | -14% | 13% | 7% | -4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.59 | 0.42 29% | 0.48 19% | 0.94 -59% | 0.55 7% | 0.515 ? 13% | 0.871 ? -48% |
Idle Average * | 1.12 | 1.55 -38% | 1.53 -37% | 1.5 -34% | 0.77 31% | 1.005 ? 10% | 1.425 ? -27% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.19 | 1.58 -33% | 1.86 -56% | 1.57 -32% | 0.91 24% | 1.075 ? 10% | 1.582 ? -33% |
Load Average * | 14.72 | 3.41 77% | 11.03 25% | 13.81 6% | 14.1 ? 4% | 7.13 ? 52% | |
Load Maximum * | 16.57 | 11.82 29% | 11.68 30% | 16.69 -1% | 16.5 ? -0% | 10.7 ? 35% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池运行时间
Galaxy S25 Edge 的电池续航时间是我们测试中最大的惊喜。电池容量小可能会让人担心,但三星智能手机的续航时间几乎和 S25 Edge 一样长。 Galaxy S25一样长,因此电池续航能力非常出色。
Galaxy S25 Edge 的模拟网页浏览时间接近 18 小时,连续循环播放高清视频的时间超过 25 小时。虽然这还不能完全击败同价位的竞争产品,但充满电应该足够一天的高强度使用。
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3900 mAh | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4685 mAh | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5060 mAh | Honor Magic7 Pro 5270 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 43% | -7% | 13% | 15% | |
Reader / Idle | 2626 | 4226 61% | 2527 -4% | 2750 5% | |
H.264 | 1539 | 1990 29% | 1806 17% | 1935 26% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 1074 | 1249 16% | 998 -7% | 1481 38% | 1331 24% |
Load | 217 | 357 65% | 217 0% | 223 3% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
超薄型三星Galaxy S25 Edge 虽然尺寸小巧,但电池续航时间长,给人留下了深刻印象。这款 6.7 英寸的手机特别推荐给那些喜欢大尺寸、功能强大而又轻便的智能手机,并且不太看重变焦摄像头的用户。
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
- 06/23/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero
可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.