结论 -Honor Magic8 Lite
Honor Magic8 Lite 是一款坚固耐用的中端智能手机，它是 Magic7 Lite 的继任者，也是Honor X70 的全球对应机型。它将 IP68/IP69K 防护等级、最高 2.5 米的防跌落能力和 -30 至 +55 °C 的耐温能力等坚固耐用的特性与纤薄的设计相结合。6.79 英寸 OLED 显示屏刷新率为 120 赫兹，HDR 亮度高达 6,000 cd/m²，PWM 调光频率为 3,840 赫兹，具有良好的户外可读性。
10800 万像素的主摄像头可拍摄出清晰的照片，但超广角摄像头和弱光下的表现就差强人意了。骁龙 6 代 4 处理器与 8GB RAM 的搭配确保了该机的出色性能。Wi-Fi 性能稳定，但速度较慢，扬声器在最大音量时容易失真。7500 毫安时电池可提供出色的续航时间。在欧洲六年的软件更新帮助完善了这款虽然充满妥协但却均衡的产品。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Magic8 Lite 可从以下网站直接购买Honor购买，也可从Amazon 等零售商处购买。.
- $8.07GUYAHANYER (4-Pack Designed for Honor Magic8 Lite Screen Protector, Anti Scratch 9H+ Tempered Glass Film, HD Easy Installation Bubble Free Screen Protector for Honor Magic8 Lite (6.79")
- $5.67GUYAHANYER (2-Pack Designed for Honor Magic8 Lite Screen Protector, Anti Scratch 9H+ Tempered Glass Film, HD Easy Installation Bubble Free Screen Protector for Honor Magic8 Lite (6.79")
Honor Magic8 Lite 继承了 Magic7 Lite是 2025 年 7 月在中国发布的Honor X70 的全球对应机型。与其他Honor 智能手机一样，这款手机在中国以外地区的电池容量较小（中国型号为 8,300 毫安时），充电速度较慢，同时也没有无线充电功能。
规格 -Honor Magic8 Lite
外壳和功能 - 可承受最高 2.5 米的高度跌落
Honor Magic8 Lite 具有耐用智能手机的典型规格。它通过了 IP68 和 IP69K 标准认证，具有防尘和防水功能，能够承受高压水柱和高温水蒸气。它还能从高达 2.5 米的高处跌落，并能在 -30 °C 至 +55 °C 的温度范围内无限制地运行。不过，从外观上看，它并不像一款坚固耐用的手机，而像一款传统的智能手机。
制造质量总体上令人信服，但手机在受到扭转时会出现明显的嘎吱声。不过，在跌落测试中，它毫发无损。
Magic8 Lite 有 256 GB 或 512 GB 内部存储空间可供选择。
通信和操作 - Magic8 Lite，带光学指纹传感器
从纸面上看，Honor Magic8 Lite 支持 Wi-Fi 6，但实际上在我们的评测中证明速度相对较慢，更接近 Wi-Fi ac 的性能水平。传输速率至少是稳定的。支持所有主要的移动网络频率，尽管整体频段覆盖范围不是特别广。
将 Magic8 Lite 放在耳边时，通话质量不错，但背景噪声抑制效果一般。
电容式触摸屏反应可靠，集成了光学指纹传感器，识别率高，解锁速度快。此外，还可通过前置摄像头使用安全性较低的面部解锁功能。单手操作、全面的手势控制和始终开启的显示屏也一应俱全。虽然Honor 没有提供详细的规格，但振动电机很微妙，感觉像是 ERM 装置。
| Networking | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Google Pixel 9a | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性 - Magic8 Lite 的六年更新
Honor Magic8 Lite 仍搭载Android 15 和 MagicOS 9.0，但预计不久的将来会升级到Android 16 和 MagicOS 10。与旗舰机型相比，可用的人工智能功能略显有限。
外包装不含塑料，但Honor 没有提供任何有关产品整体可持续性的具体信息。在欧洲，Magic8 Lite 可以享受六年的安全和版本更新服务，而世界其他地区的买家只能享受两年的服务。
摄像头 -Honor 智能手机，主摄像头功能强大
Honor Magic8 Lite 的前置摄像头能拍摄出不错的照片，但在弱光环境下，图像质量下降得很快，而且拍摄出来的照片往往有些过度锐化。画面边缘的细节也会丢失。
后置 10800 万像素主摄像头可拍摄出令人满意的图像，并可通过裁剪提供可用的 2 倍变焦。除此之外，图像质量很快就会变软，不过最大变焦系数为 10 倍。超广角摄像头只能提供低分辨率，整体效果较差。
主摄像头可进行 30 帧/秒的 4K 或 60 帧/秒的 1,080p 视频录制。前置摄像头最多只能以 30 帧/秒的全高清速度拍摄。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide-angle lens5x zoomLow light
显示屏 - Magic8 Lite，具有极其明亮的 HDR 再现功能
Magic8 Lite 的 6.79 英寸（17.25 厘米）OLED 显示屏图像清晰，支持高达 120 Hz 的刷新率，系统可自动或手动将刷新率降至 60 Hz。
考虑到其价格档次，显示屏亮度非常高，在 HDR 模式下可达 6,000 cd/m²。色彩再现校准良好，在室外，面板在大多数情况下仍易于读取。
Honor 为了使显示屏更容易看清，该机采用了高达 3,840 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光技术。不过，较低的基本频率可能仍会对敏感用户造成影响。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1754 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
CCT: 6358 K
| Honor Magic8 Lite OLED, 2640x1200, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8" | Google Pixel 9a pOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -136% | -5% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1754 | 495 -72% | 1318 -25% | 1978 13% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1748 | 466 -73% | 1306 -25% | 1775 2% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 86 -12% | 98 0% | 76 -22% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.58 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 5.85 -290% | 1.5 -0% | 1.1 27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.5 | 9.78 -179% | 2.9 17% | 3 14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 7 -192% | 2.3 4% | 2.2 8% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.231 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6358 102% | 8691 75% | 6819 95% | 6622 98% |
| Contrast (:1) | 853 |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Google Pixel 9a | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Google Pixel 9a | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 14.56 % Secondary Frequency: 3846 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8083 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.07 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5315 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5395 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.68 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.281 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3985 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间 -Honor 依靠 Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
Honor Magic8 Lite 采用了 高通骁龙 6 代 4搭配 8GB LPDDR4x 内存。这款入门级 SoC 可提供稳定的整体系统性能，但也仅此而已。
即使在负载情况下，表面温度也基本保持在 40 ℃ 以下，仅在小范围内升至 44.8 ℃ 的峰值。SoC 本身不受影响，也不会出现节流现象。
双扬声器在中等音量下可提供稳定的声音输出，但在最大音量下会严重失真。低音响应普遍较弱。
虽然电池容量比国行版小，但其 7,500 毫安时的容量仍然非常可观，在我们的测试中提供了非常不错的续航时间。不过，如果效率更高，运行时间可能会更长。
电池充电功率高达 66 瓦。在我们的测试中，充满电需要 57 分钟（19 分钟充满 50%，37 分钟充满 80%）。
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (n=1) | |
| Half Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (n=1) | |
| Quantized NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (n=1) | |
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=149, last 2 years) | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (n=1) | |
| Google Pixel 9a | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | Google Pixel 9a | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -66% | -37% | -33% | -15% | -3% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1948.54 | 1043.4 -46% | 996.23 -49% | 1688.82 -13% | 1874 ? -4% | 2248 ? 15% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1828.13 | 232.6 -87% | 970.63 -47% | 853.5 -53% | 1338 ? -27% | 1887 ? 3% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 344.19 | 194.4 -44% | 255.89 -26% | 241.03 -30% | 290 ? -16% | 299 ? -13% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 412.87 | 63.5 -85% | 304.95 -26% | 261.8 -37% | 357 ? -14% | 346 ? -16% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | |
| Google Pixel 9a | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | |
| Google Pixel 9a | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
| Google Pixel 9a | |
Honor Magic8 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (0.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
| Google Pixel 9a | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Honor Magic8 Lite 是一款坚固耐用的中端智能手机，拥有非常耐用的机身、明亮的 120Hz OLED 显示屏、7,500 毫安时大电池和稳固的主摄像头。不过，它在 Wi-Fi 性能、扬声器质量、超广角摄像头和某些便利功能等方面与国行机型相比有所妥协。
Honor Magic8 Lite
- 01/14/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 78%  | Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.87 GUYAHANYER (3-Pack Designed ... 2. $8.07 GUYAHANYER (4-Pack Designed ... 3. $5.67 GUYAHANYER (2-Pack Designed ... List Price: 400€ | 189 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.79" 2640x1200 427 PPI OLED |
2. 75.8%  | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $599.89 List Price: 609€ | 240 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" 2408x1080 400 PPI PLS |
3. 79.6%  | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $6.99 JETech Screen Protector for ... 2. $11.99 Ibywind For Nothing Phone (3... 3. $4.99 Fhyeugfy for Nothing Phone (... | 211 g | 6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED | |
4. 81%  | Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $454.00 Google Pixel 9a with Gemini ... 2. $6.74 Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design... 3. $5.99 Ferilinso 3 Pack Screen Prot... List Price: 549€ | 185.9 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" 2424x1080 421 PPI pOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
