结论 - iPhone Air
iPhone Air 的超薄设计和优质做工给我们留下了深刻印象,但超薄设计也付出了代价:电池、摄像头和音效只能用平庸来形容,而高昂的价格和缺乏 USB 3.2 和双扬声器等功能则破坏了整体印象。
对设计和便携性要求较高的用户来说,Air 是一款时尚的生活设备,但专业机型更适合高级用户和相机发烧友。总的来说,Air 仍然是一个大胆的设计选择,但也有明显的妥协,其外形比功能更能打动我们。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
iPhone Air 有各种颜色和存储空间,包括黑色、黑色和白色。Apple,但在撰写本评论时,亚马逊上还没有提供。
Table of Contents
- 结论 - iPhone Air
- 规格:Apple iPhone Air
- 保护壳 - iPhone Air 采用钛金属和陶瓷保护壳
- 功能 - 仅适用于 iPhone Air 的 USB 2.0
- 软件 - 面向欧洲的 Pared backApple Intelligence
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - iPhone 配备 Wi-Fi 7
- 电话功能和语音质量
- 摄像头 - iPhone Air 仅提供两个镜头
- 配件和保修 - Care+ 专业版价格
- 输入设备和操作 - iPhone Air 和 Face ID
- 显示屏--明亮的新型中型 OLED 面板
- 性能 - iPhone Air 的图形处理器较弱
- 排放 - iPhone 采用单声道扬声器
- 电池续航时间 - 3,149 毫安时的超薄电池
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
- 可能的替代品比较
Apple iPhone Air 是同类产品中的首款,有三种存储版本:
| 存储 | 价格 |
|---|---|
| 256 GB | $999 |
| 512 GB | 1199 美元 |
| 1,024 GB | 1,399 美元 |
零售价仅比 iPhone 17 Pro 低 100 美元 iPhone 17 Pro我们的评测强调了不得不做出的妥协。Air 也是Apple 欧洲首款放弃 nano-SIM 卡支持的 iPhone,以延长电池寿命。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格:Apple iPhone Air
保护壳 - iPhone Air 采用钛金属和陶瓷保护壳
iPhone Air 采用超薄设计,是Apple 迄今最薄的智能手机。它的标称厚度为 5.64 毫米,我们可以通过测量确认这一点。加上大幅度的凸起(+2.96 毫米)和安装在顶部的摄像头(额外+2.7 毫米),其最厚处的厚度为 11.3 毫米。不过,iPhone Air 的重量仅为 165 克,相对较轻。
Apple iPhone Air 的边框采用了高度抛光的钛合金。虽然看起来很光滑,但相应地也容易留下指纹。正面使用的是 Ceramic Shield 2 保护玻璃,而背面使用的仍然是第一代的旧版本。尽管设计纤薄,Air 却非常坚固,能无声无息地抵御扭转。iPhone Air 的制造质量非常出色,缝隙紧密一致,89% 的屏占比也给我们留下了深刻印象。
iPhone Air 符合 IP68 防水标准,防水深度达 6 米,有以下几种颜色可供选择:iPhoneAir 有以下几种颜色:太空黑、云白、浅金和天蓝, 我们的评测机采用的是后一种颜色。不过,根据光线角度的不同,它也会显得更白而不是更蓝。
功能 - 仅适用于 iPhone Air 的 USB 2.0
就像 iPhone 17、Air 也只支持 USB 2.0,无法进行视频输出。因此,数据传输速度之慢可想而知。
除此之外,Air 的蓝牙 6.0、NFC、UWB 和 Wi-Fi 7 使其与 Pro 机型相当。
软件 - 面向欧洲的 Pared backApple Intelligence
可持续性
Apple 提供有关https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/products/iphone/iPhone_Air_PER_Sept2025.pdf的详细信息,Air 型号也不例外。它采用无塑料包装,还参加了自我维修计划。.
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - iPhone 配备 Wi-Fi 7
iPhone Air 支持广泛的蜂窝网络频率,几乎可以在全球任何地方建立连接。在城市地区接收效果良好。
它采用最新的 Wi-Fi 标准 Wi-Fi 7,支持所有三个频段。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 搭配使用时,尽管 6 GHz 频段在接收数据时可能会更快一些,但数据传输速度还是很稳定的。
| Networking | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iPhone Air 使用双频全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)与所有主要卫星网络连接来确定自己的位置。位置跟踪速度相当快,但在骑车的实际测试中,智能手机检索位置的时间间隔明显较长,这意味着路线跟踪并不总是准确的。不过,它仍然完全能够满足导航目的。
电话功能和语音质量
Apple iPhone Air 支持双 eSIM 卡,但不再有实体 SIM 卡。VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能仍然可用。
将设备放在耳边时通话质量不错,但降噪效果一般。
摄像头 - iPhone Air 仅提供两个镜头
iPhone Air 配备了其他 2025 机型的全新 Center Stage 摄像头,照片和视频效果良好(最高 4K @ 60fps)。
手机后部只容纳了一个摄像头。任何期待与 iPhone 17 Pro 相同摄像头的人都会失望,因为Apple 决定整合 iPhone 17 中功能稍逊的摄像头。虽然我们可能会被指责吹毛求疵,但考虑到价格区间,这无疑是合理的。iPhone 拍出的照片效果不错,但在动态范围和景深方面暴露出不足。变焦功能在放大到 2 倍时效果不错,但超过 2 倍后,图像很快就会变得像素化。视频最好以 60fps 的超高清速度和杜比视界(Dolby Vision)录制。
与 17 Pro 不同,Air 的慢动作录制仅限于 240fps 的全高清,完全没有电影视频模式,也没有 ProRAW 和 ProRes 视频。融合相机功能可利用 26、28 和 35 毫米镜头。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain camera5x zoomLow light

配件和保修 - Care+ 专业版价格
iPhone Air 只配备了一条 USB-C 连接线(两端)。
在德国的保修期为 12 个月,这并不影响 零售商的保修期.AppleCare+ 是一种保险套餐,其价格因保险范围而异。一次性支付 139.99 美元,为期一年,也可按月支付 13.99 美元。
输入设备和操作 - iPhone Air 和 Face ID
显示屏--明亮的新型中型 OLED 面板
从技术上讲,iPhone Air 的显示屏与 17 Pro 相似,但 6.5 英寸(16.51 厘米)的显示屏稍大一些。它拥有相同的亮度水平,在我们的测试中,在缩小的白色区域(APL18)上,它的亮度达到了 3,085 cd/m²。
PWM 频率最高可达 480 Hz,还包括可选的脉冲平滑功能。与 17 Pro类似,其效果仅限于低亮度时的平缓振幅。这意味着对此类问题敏感的人仍会感到一些不适。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1060 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
CCT: 6519 K
| Apple iPhone Air OLED, 2736x1260, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Apple iPhone 17 Pro OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3" | Motorola Edge 60 Pro P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -44% | -5% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1060 | 1399 32% | 1059 0% | 1099 4% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1064 | 1371 29% | 1060 0% | 1073 1% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 94 -4% | 99 1% | 91 -7% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 3.9 -200% | 1.3 -0% | 1.25 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3 | 6.3 -110% | 3.6 -20% | 1.68 44% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 2.1 -11% | 2.1 -11% | 1.4 26% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.01 109% | 2.2 100% | 2.031 108% |
| CCT | 6519 100% | 6506 100% | 6542 99% | 6403 102% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 16.09 % Secondary Frequency: 480 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
以固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓,但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看)。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.563 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.6245 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5315 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.624 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
性能 - iPhone Air 的图形处理器较弱
名义上,Air 使用 Apple A19 Pro、的 SoC。Geekbench 分数略低的原因可能是散热降低,而散热降低的时间相对较早。这在安兔兔测试中更为明显,Air 的成绩落后于 iPhone 17落后于 iPhone 17 A19 芯片组.
不过,在日常情况下,这一点几乎不会被察觉,系统也能流畅运行。
| AImark - Score v3.x | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Average Apple A19 Pro (35571 - 37611, n=3) | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
iPhone Air 的 A19 Pro GPU仅使用五个内核,而不是 iPhone 17 Pro 的六个内核。 iPhone 17 Pro.因此,性能也较差。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Average Apple A19 Pro (327 - 358, n=3) | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Apple iPhone Air (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=155, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0 | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Average Apple A19 Pro (598 - 643, n=3) | |
| Apple iPhone Air (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=132, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
| Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0 | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Average Apple A19 Pro (40.7 - 42.8, n=3) | |
| Apple iPhone Air (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Average Apple A19 Pro (297 - 306, n=3) | |
| Apple iPhone Air (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=148, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Average Apple A19 Pro (115463 - 121337, n=3) | |
| Apple iPhone Air (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=156, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (Chrome 137.0.7151.72) | |
| Apple iPhone Air (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Average Apple A19 Pro (257 - 280, n=3) | |
* ... smaller is better
排放 - iPhone 采用单声道扬声器
温度
即使在负载情况下,iPhone Air 的表面温度也能保持安全,但在一些压力测试中,SoC 出现了明显的跳动。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
| Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
发言人
iPhone Air 的听筒中只有一个扬声器,而且音量不大。音质尚可,但高音偏重。
与其他 iPhone 相似,Air 的蓝牙没有高分辨率编解码器,也没有 Auracast。通过 USB-C 有线连接可以获得最佳音质。
Apple iPhone Air audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 3,149 毫安时的超薄电池
耗电量
测试证明,iPhone Air 的耗电量并不突出。以最大 20 瓦的功率充电,充满电大约需要一个半小时(50%:29 分钟)。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Apple iPhone Air 3149 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3900 mAh | Apple iPhone 17 Pro 3988 mAh | Motorola Edge 60 Pro 6000 mAh | Average Apple A19 Pro | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | -15% | -36% | 2% | 3% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.52 | 0.59 -13% | 0.56 -8% | 1.3 -150% | 0.56 ? -8% | 0.853 ? -64% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.95 | 1.12 43% | 1.78 9% | 1.9 3% | 1.677 ? 14% | 1.43 ? 27% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.98 | 1.19 40% | 1.89 5% | 2.4 -21% | 1.823 ? 8% | 1.609 ? 19% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 7.29 | 14.72 -102% | 12.36 -70% | 8.6 -18% | 7.92 ? -9% | 7.09 ? 3% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 16.24 | 16.57 -2% | 17.69 -9% | 14.9 8% | 15.1 ? 7% | 11.2 ? 31% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
尽管 iPhone Air 的电池容量非常小,但它的续航时间却出奇地长,足够你中度使用一整天。如果不是这样,就不要离最近的电源太远。
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Apple iPhone Air | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分

iPhone Air 采用了梦幻般的超薄设计,配备了钛金属边框,但在其别致的外表下却隐藏着迟缓的 USB 2.0 接口、普通的单摄像头,而且电池在中午时就会耗尽。
Apple iPhone Air
- 10/30/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple iPhone Air Apple A19 Pro ⎘ Apple A19 Pro 5-Core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $99.00 Apple iPhone Air MagSafe Bat... 2. $1,429.00 iPhone Air Space Black, 512GB 3. $119.00 Apple AirPods 4 Wireless Ear... List Price: 1449€ | 165 g | Apple 512GB NVMe | 6.50" 2736x1260 463 PPI OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $4.89 ivoler 3-in-1 Case for Samsu... 2. $7.99 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 3. $6.99 amFilm Auto-Alignment OneTou... List Price: 1249€ | 163 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 3120x1440 395 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro ⎘ Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $8.98 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... 2. $37.99 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Silicone... 3. iPhone 17 Pro Deep Blue 256GB List Price: 1549€ | 206 g | Apple 512GB NVMe | 6.30" 2622x1206 458 PPI OLED | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind For Motorola Edge 60... 2. $6.59 Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ... 3. $8.88 LXEEOLX [2 Pack Hydrogel Scr... List Price: 600 Euro | 186 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI P-OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.














































