对Honor 600的评测结论
与前代机型相比，Honor 600 在多方面都得到了提升。这些改进包括更大的电池、更先进的 SoC、更亮的显示屏，而且这款智能手机终于具备了防水功能。
在显示屏方面，亮度提升至惊人的 8,000 cd/m²，这一数值显得极为惊人。 事实上，我们的实测数值甚至略高一些，但这仅出现在HDR播放时。不过，在小面积白色区域上的峰值亮度也几乎翻了一番，超过了3,000 cd/m²。这些都是非常出色的表现，尽管色彩还原的准确性稍弱一些。不过，这种差异用肉眼几乎无法察觉。
一方面，电池容量大幅增加，但欧洲版的电池容量略小一些。电池续航表现非常出色，但如果能进一步提升能效，续航时间本可以更长。不过，该机型支持最高80瓦的快充，但未配备无线充电功能。
Honor 600型号仍未配备6 GHz Wi-Fi。尽管该机在我们的WLAN测试中速度提升显著，但在这一价位段，我们原本至少期待它能支持Wi-Fi 6E。 这款相对紧凑的智能手机虽然略重一些，但现已通过IP69K认证，因此能够承受高压水柱的冲刷，而Honor 400甚至不具备防水功能。 Honor 还承诺为其Numbers系列提供长达六年的系统更新，并搭载了众多AI功能，例如深度伪造检测或将图片转换为视频等。 因此，Honor 600 是一款技术全面且成功的智能手机，其原本较高的建议零售价现已大幅下调。其数字变焦效果相当不错，但无法替代光学变焦——遗憾的是，光学变焦功能仅在Honor 600 Pro 上才有。尽管如此，其技术改进非常显著，因此从前代机型升级至此款也颇具价值。
Pros
Cons
价格和供货情况
Honor 600 提供 8/256 或 8/512 GB 两种存储容量版本，可直接从Honor处直接购买。
- $589.99Honor 400 5G, 12GB RAM, 256GB, Desert Gold with HONOR CHOICE Earbuds E6i | 1-year manufacturer warranty, 6000mAh silicon and carbon battery
- $169.88KHUYTOR 17PM Smartphone New Upgrade 12GB+512GB/6.99" Display 68+108MP Zoom Camera,Tempered Glass Finish, 7000mAh Android 15 (Orange)
- $425.00HONOR X9c Dual-SIM 256GB ROM + 12GB RAM (GSM Only | No CDMA) Factory Unlocked 5G Smartphone (Titanium Black) - International Version
规格：Honor 600
机身与功能——采用iPhone设计的Android 手机
Honor 600的设计显然让人联想到当前的 iPhone 17 Pro，尤其是选择橙色版本时——甚至还配有相机按键。不过，这并不影响它仍是一款高品质智能手机的事实：它采用哑光铝制边框，做工精良。机身看起来非常坚固，接缝处缝隙极窄，并符合IP69K级别的防尘防水标准。
电池容量达6,400 mAh，虽不算小，但比中国版（7,000 mAh）的容量要低。 在软件方面，Honor 600再次提供了基于AI的图片转视频功能，现在可以生成长达8秒的视频片段，还可以通过提示词输入额外信息。在测试中，该功能表现相当不错，效果比 Honor 400。
通信——Honor 600（不支持6 GHz Wi-Fi）
Honor 600 虽不支持 6 GHz Wi-Fi，但在 5 GHz 网络中的速度表现依然不错，尽管数据接收速度稍慢一些。这款Honor 手机还支持广泛的蜂窝频段以及所有当前标准。 Honor 600 的通话音质悦耳，背景噪音抑制功能在大多数情况下也表现良好，只有在嘈杂的主干道上才会达到其极限。
| Networking | |
| Honor 600 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
相机——适用于Honor 600的现代200 MPix光学系统
Honor 600 依然搭载了 200 MPix 主摄像头，该摄像头支持光学防抖，成像表现出色。 在默认设置下，照片亮度过高，不符合我们的审美。虽然可以手动调整，但遗憾的是无法永久保存该设置。额外的超广角镜头成像表现尚可，并支持微距拍摄，但边缘处常会出现畸变。变焦仅支持数字变焦，但最高可达4倍放大倍率，使用起来还算顺手。
在视频拍摄方面，Honor 600 还支持 21:9 宽高比，对于全高清（2,520 x 1,080p；超高清：3,840 x 1,644 像素）分辨率，甚至支持原生录制。
| 宽高比 | 分辨率 | |
|---|---|---|
| 照片 | 4:3 / 16:9 / 1:1 / 全屏 | 12.5 / 200 MPix |
| 视频（主摄像头） | 16:9 / 21:9（1080p起） | 高清（30 / 60 FPS）全高清（30 / 60 FPS）超高清（30 FPS） |
| 视频（前置摄像头） | 16:9 / 21:9（源自 1080p） | 高清 (30 / 60 FPS)全高清 (30 / 60 FPS)超高清 (30 FPS) |
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
显示屏——峰值亮度惊人，但仅限于HDR模式
在亮度方面，Honor 600的显示屏与前代产品相比再次实现了显著提升。Honor 400的最高亮度为5,000 cd/m²，而600型号如今已达到惊人的8,000 cd/m²。不过，这些亮度仅在播放HDR内容时才能实现。 但在其他方面，其亮度表现同样非常出色。 Honor 600采用高频PWM调光技术，标称频率高达3,840 Hz。我们在最低亮度下测得的频率略低，但仍处于极高水平，因此即使对敏感人群而言，也不太可能产生不适感，不过由于基频较低，仍不能完全排除这一可能性。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1787 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 6874 K
| Honor 600 AMOLED, 2728x1264, 6.6" | Google Pixel 10a pOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3" | Nothing Phone (4a) AMOLED, 2720x1224, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro AMOLED, 2756x1268, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -33% | -68% | -23% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 3102 | 3050 -2% | 1455 -53% | 3475 12% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 8192 | 2925 -64% | 1403 -83% | 3406 -58% |
| Response Times | -16% | -232% | -9% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.06 ? | 1.42 ? -34% | 8.18 ? -672% | 1.11 ? -5% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1 ? | 1.07 ? -7% | 0.99 ? 1% | 1.05 ? -5% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 60 | 240 | 90 | 120 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 13.86 | 14.71 -6% | 17.49 -26% | 16.04 -16% |
| Screen | 40% | -5% | 23% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1787 | 2205 23% | 1536 -14% | 1104 -38% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.4 26% | 2.6 -37% | 1.2 37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.3 | 2.3 57% | 5.7 -8% | 2.4 55% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 1.6 53% | 2 41% | 2.1 38% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6874 95% | 6715 97% | 6878 95% | 6472 100% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1538 | 1102 | ||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 97 | 97 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
5% | -102% /
-95% | -3% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 13.86 % Secondary Frequency: 2941 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7781 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列（在最低亮度下，振幅曲线看起来很平坦，但这是由于缩放比例造成的。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅曲线的放大图。）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.46 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.535 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.06 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3275 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.733 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间
| Honor 600 | Google Pixel 10a | Nothing Phone (4a) | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -21% | -16% | 24% | -18% | -3% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1986.99 | 1689.27 -15% | 2003.93 1% | 3576.86 80% | 1878 ? -5% | 2244 ? 13% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1807.77 | 826.38 -54% | 1596.2 -12% | 3565.14 97% | 1378 ? -24% | 1926 ? 7% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 353.95 | 326.53 -8% | 263.22 -26% | 324.76 -8% | 289 ? -18% | 310 ? -12% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 451 | 430.37 -5% | 325.75 -28% | 112.05 -75% | 349 ? -23% | 362 ? -20% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
Honor 600 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 10a audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.16 / 0.37 Watt |
| Idle |  1.24 / 2.28 / 2.3 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
Honor 600 凭借更大的电池、更亮的屏幕和更出色的功能赢得了好评，但在 WLAN 和长焦摄像头方面仍有改进空间。
Honor 600
- 06/30/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 替代方案一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 82.8%  | Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 722 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 650€ | 185 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.57" 2728x1264 458 PPI AMOLED |
2. 85.3%  | Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 549€ | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" 2424x1080 421 PPI pOLED |
3. 78.6%  | Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 429€ | 204.5 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2720x1224 440 PPI AMOLED |
4. 83.8%  | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP8 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 400€ | 202 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.59" 2756x1268 460 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
