Notebookcheck Logo
摩托罗拉签名版
ⓘ Notebookcheck

摩托罗拉 Signature 评测:DxO 屡获殊荣,向Apple 和三星发起进攻

优质的外观,几乎总是优质的内饰。

摩托罗拉 Signature 是目前最薄、最轻的智能手机之一。在测试中,摩托罗拉新款顶级机型明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏和出色的索尼 LYTIA 摄像系统也给人留下了深刻印象,该系统在 DxO 摄像测试中名列前十。阅读测试,了解哪些人仍然不应该购买 Signature。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Camera Smartphone Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7

对摩托罗拉签名版的评价

摩托罗拉 Signature 是一款非常强大的旗舰智能手机,尽管它并非在每个方面都令人信服。纤薄但非常耐用的机身、非常明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕以及配备四个 5000 万像素镜头的摄像头绝对是一流的。再加上 7 年更新保证,你应该可以长期使用 Signature 手机。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

不过,摩托罗拉顶级机型所搭载的骁龙 8 代 5 并不是最强大的 SoC,经常使用智能手机玩游戏的人很可能会对测试设备的高发热量感到失望。电池也落后于竞争对手。虽然噪音水平不错,但与高端标准相比略低于平均水平。

Pros

+ 非常好的相机系统
+ 轻薄的外壳
+ IP68/69 认证
+ 明亮的 165 Hz LPTO AMOLED 显示屏
+ 7 年更新
+ Android 16
+ 充电功率高达 90 瓦

Cons

- 无最高 SoC
- 负载情况下发热严重
- 只能通过 eSIM 卡实现双卡双待
- 电池寿命一般

价格和供应情况

摩托罗拉 Signature的联想售价不到 1000 欧元。在测试期间,您可以在亚马逊等网站上以不到 950 欧元的价格购买到这款产品。

摩托罗拉已将其新旗舰智能手机命名为 Signature,并将其定位为与Apple 、三星和小米的顶级机型竞争。这款手机在相机方面应该会给人留下特别深刻的印象,并且已经在这方面获得了好评。在 DxO 基准测试中,它击败了谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 等顶级智能手机,跻身测试时拥有最佳摄像头的十大智能手机之列。.

规格

Motorola Signature
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 8c/8t, 2 x 3.8 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3, 6 x 3.3 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.80 inch 20:9, 2780 x 1264 pixel 450 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 6200 Nits max. brightness, touch sampling rate up to 360 Hz, water touch, LTPO, Always-on-Display, 10 Bit color depth, 100% DCI-P3 , HDR, 165 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 472 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity sensory, Digital Compass, Fingerprint sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/8), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/32/34/38/39/40/41/42/43/48/66/71), 5G (Band n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n70/n71/n77/n78/n80/n81/n83/n84/n89/n94); Hybrid dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.99 x 162.1 x 76.4
Battery
5200 mAh Silicon-Carbon, 90W charging, 50W wireless charging, 10W reverse wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony LYTIA 828, 1/1.28" sensor size, f/1.6, 2.44µm quad pixel, AF, 3,5°-OIS, Multispectral 3-in-1 light sensor) + 50MP ultrawide (f/2.0, 12mm focal length, 1.28µm quad pixel, AF, Macro, 122° FOV) + 50MP telephoto (Sony LYTIA 600, 3x optical zoom, 100x digital zoom, f/2.4, 71mm focal length, 1.6µm quad pixel, OIS, Macro, 33° FOV); video recording up to 8K@30fps, 4K@60fps, FHD Dolby Vision@60fps
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix Sony LYTIA 500, f/2.0, 1.2µm Quad Pixel, AF; video recording up to 4K@60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (Dolby Atmos & Hi-Res-Audio support), Keyboard Light: yes, USB Type-C cable, Guides, SIM tool, Protective Case, 24 Months Warranty, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 (display), Linen-inspired finish/Twill-inspired finish (Pantone Martini Olive/Pantone Carbin), aluminium frame; IP68/IP69 & MIL-STD-810H certified; GPS: GPS, Glonass, Galileo; Connectivity: Nano SIM + eSIM, VoLTE/WiFI calling, HDR support: Dolby Vision, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; update policy: 7 years of OS upgrades and security updates (EOL 2033); Head SAR 1.34 W/kg, Body SAR 1.934 W/kg, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
186 g
Price
1000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

案例 - 在视觉和触觉上都是顶级的

摩托罗拉 Signature 有 Pantone 颜色 Martini Olive(黄绿色)和 Carbon(海军蓝)可供选择,采用弧形设计和铝制边框。橄榄色机型的后盖表面类似棉质斜纹布。海军蓝版本则采用亚麻质感。

摩托罗拉 Signature 手机重 186 克,比许多其他顶级智能手机都轻,最厚处不到 12 毫米。它的防尘防水性能符合 IP68/69 标准,并符合 MIL-STD-810H 标准的军用坚固性要求。显示屏玻璃采用大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2。

尺寸比较

163.4 mm 78 mm 8.8 mm 233 g163.33 mm 77.82 mm 8.3 mm 220 g162.8 mm 77.6 mm 8.2 mm 218 g161.98 mm 75.48 mm 7.99 mm 226 g161.2 mm 75 mm 8.3 mm 219 g162.1 mm 76.4 mm 6.99 mm 186 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

特点 - 摩托罗拉 Signature 配备 16GB 内存和 512GB 存储空间

无论是哪种颜色,都配备了 16GB LPDDR5X 内存和 512GB UFS 4.1 内存。此外,还配备了 WiFi 7、蓝牙 6.0、双 SIM 卡、USB-C 端口(带 USB 3.2 Gen.1)和立体声扬声器。

软件 -Android 16 和 2033 年之前的更新

摩托罗拉为 Signature 配备了Android 16,谷歌操作系统几乎未作任何改动。除 Moto AI 外,只安装了少量第三方应用程序,但这些应用程序可以删除。摩托罗拉承诺 7 年更新。

摩托罗拉签名版
摩托罗拉签名版
摩托罗拉签名版
摩托罗拉签名版
摩托罗拉签名版
摩托罗拉签名版
摩托罗拉签名版
摩托罗拉签名版
摩托罗拉签名版
摩托罗拉签名版
摩托罗拉签名版
摩托罗拉签名版

可持续性

摩托罗拉 Signature 采用无塑料包装。它采用大豆油墨印刷,由符合 FSC Mix 认证的可回收材料制成。在摩托罗拉的网站上可以看到很多关于可持续发展的信息。不过,制造商没有提供有关 Signature 碳足迹的任何信息。

摩托罗拉的合作伙伴Replacebase 提供备件和自修说明。.如果您通过摩托罗拉网站购买 Signature,您可以以旧换新。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 和 WLAN 速度高达 1500 MBit/s

得益于广泛的 LTE 和 5G 频段选择,摩托罗拉 Signature 几乎可以在任何地点接收信号。

由于支持 WiFi 7,摩托罗拉 Signature 可以使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器上的 6 GHz 频段,并实现相当稳定的传输速率,峰值约为 1500 Mbps。

Networking
Motorola Signature
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
772 (min: 566) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1513 (min: 1099) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
897 (min: 688) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1489 (min: 1425) MBit/s ∼82%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
910 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
459 (min: 411) MBit/s ∼30%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1375 (min: 1300) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1180 (min: 1117) MBit/s ∼65%
Honor Magic8 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
976 (min: 951) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
580 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1856 (min: 1812) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
791 (min: 773) MBit/s ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼82%
Vivo X300 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
977 (min: 956) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
917 (min: 834) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1866 (min: 1793) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1806 (min: 1725) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
989 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
946 (min: 814) MBit/s ∼63%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
938 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1054 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1247 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1453 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
720 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1273 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1377 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼76%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Motorola Signature 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø897 (688-1087)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1720 (798-1853)
Motorola Signature 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1489 (1425-1525)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1289-1530)
Motorola Signature 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø772 (566-870)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1806 (1767-1846)
Motorola Signature 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1513 (1099-1637)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1468 (744-1523)
楼内 GPS 接收
楼内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收

摩托罗拉 Signature 使用 GPS、Glonass 和 Galileo 确定位置,但并不像顶级智能手机那样精确。

其精确度足以满足日常使用。不过,在与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表的直接比较中,摩托罗拉手机在我们测试的几个部分略显不准确,有时还会建立一个假想的环路。

GPS 测试 Motorola Signature:概述
ⓘ Notebookcheck
GPS 测试 Motorola Signature:概述
GPS 测试 Motorola Signature:桥接器
ⓘ Notebookcheck
GPS 测试 Motorola Signature:桥接器
GPS 测试 Motorola Signature:周转
ⓘ Notebookcheck
GPS 测试 Motorola Signature:周转
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:概述
ⓘ Notebookcheck
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:概述
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:桥梁
ⓘ Notebookcheck
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:桥梁
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:转弯
ⓘ Notebookcheck
GPS 测试 Garmin Venu 2:转弯

电话功能和语音质量

摩托罗拉 Signature 支持 nano-SIM 和 eSIM 双 SIM 卡操作,还提供 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话功能。在测试中,这款智能手机提供了良好的语音质量,语音再现清晰、鲜明。

摄像头 - 四倍于 5000 万像素的索尼 LYTIA 图像传感器

自拍相机拍摄的照片
ⓘ Notebookcheck
自拍相机拍摄的照片

摩托罗拉为 Signature 配备了四个 5000 万像素镜头。主摄像头、超广角摄像头和长焦摄像头各有一个,而第四个摄像头则用作自拍摄像头,并且表现出色。

这四枚摄像头配备了索尼 LYTIA 传感器,在日光下能拍摄出非常出色的图像,动态范围极佳,细节丰富,色彩还原非常逼真。主摄像头采用 1/1.28 英寸大尺寸传感器,即使在夜间也能拍摄出非常漂亮的照片。

超广角摄像头和长焦摄像头的成像质量也很高,不过前者在图像边缘会出现轻微模糊。长焦相机提供 3 倍光学变焦,并能以数字方式将图像放大 100 倍,这看起来非常人工化。在 5 倍左右的中等变焦水平下,仍然可以获得非常好的效果。

摩托罗拉 Signature 可录制质量非常好的视频,最高可达 8K,每秒 24 帧。在 4K 条件下,可以达到每秒 60 帧。

主摄像头
ⓘ Notebookcheck
主摄像头
主摄像头
ⓘ Notebookcheck
主摄像头
主摄像头
ⓘ Notebookcheck
主摄像头
主摄像头(无变焦)
ⓘ Notebookcheck
主摄像头(无变焦)
主摄像头(6 倍变焦)
ⓘ Notebookcheck
主摄像头(6 倍变焦)
主摄像头(20 倍变焦)
ⓘ Notebookcheck
主摄像头(20 倍变焦)

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angleLow light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
2.2 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Signature: 4.3 ∆E min: 0.69 - max: 9.66 ∆E
ColorChecker
4.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
2 ∆E
7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Signature: 4.66 ∆E min: 1.09 - max: 9.21 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括保护罩

摩托罗拉 Signature 随附 USB-C 数据线、保护盖、SIM 卡工具和快速入门指南。

摩托罗拉提供 24 个月 保修期保修。

输入设备和操作 - 响应式显示屏和人工智能按钮

触摸屏每秒最多可扫描 360 次。同时,它的显示频率高达 165 赫兹,因此操作非常快速和精确。这同样适用于显示屏下方的指纹传感器。

按下外壳上的左按钮可激活 Moto AI。该按钮也可以停用,但不能分配其他功能。

键盘肖像
键盘肖像
键盘景观
键盘景观

显示屏 - 亮度高达 4500 尼特

子像素结构
ⓘ Notebookcheck
子像素结构

你可以对这块显示屏寄予厚望,因为根据规格,它的亮度应高达 6200 尼特。我们在测量中没有达到这个值,但在 HDR 模式下高达 4500 尼特,屏幕仍能提供很高的亮度。它还能非常清晰地显示内容。

对于 PWM 敏感的用户,显示设置中有一个 "防止闪烁 "开关,可以在所有亮度级别下以 120 Hz 的频率进行类似直流的调光。

1544
cd/m²
1540
cd/m²
1550
cd/m²
1551
cd/m²
1561
cd/m²
1549
cd/m²
1545
cd/m²
1543
cd/m²
1540
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1561 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1547 cd/m² Minimum: 2.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1561 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.46 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
103.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.144
CCT: 6612 K
Motorola Signature
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"
Honor Magic8 Pro
OLED, 2808x1256, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"
Vivo X300 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"
Screen
-4%
16%
-27%
9%
13%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1561
1054
-32%
1809
16%
1357
-13%
1574
1%
1771
13%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1547
1059
-32%
1821
18%
1350
-13%
1562
1%
1773
15%
Brightness Distribution (%)
99
93
-6%
95
-4%
94
-5%
93
-6%
99
0%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.46
1.57
-8%
1.2
18%
3.1
-112%
1.3
11%
1.3
11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.63
2.8
23%
2.9
20%
4.7
-29%
2.7
26%
2.8
23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
1.7
32%
1.8
28%
2.2
12%
2
20%
2.1
16%
Gamma
2.144 103%
2.32 95%
2.22 99%
2 110%
2.26 97%
2.25 98%
CCT
6612 98%
6993 93%
6446 101%
6391 102%
6709 97%
6452 101%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3519 cd/m² +66%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3233 cd/m² +53%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2613 cd/m² +23%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2329 cd/m² +10%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2120 cd/m²
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6045 cd/m² +33%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4542 cd/m²
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3458 cd/m² -24%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2785 cd/m² -39%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2768 cd/m² -39%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120.2 Hz
Amplitude: 12 %

The display backlight flickers at 120.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120.2 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7999 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)

利用光谱仪和卡尔曼软件对 AMOLED 屏幕进行的分析表明,平均 DeltaE 偏差非常小。色彩显示可通过三种配置文件进行设置。色温也可以调整。

色彩保真度
ⓘ Notebookcheck
色彩保真度
色彩空间 sRGB
ⓘ Notebookcheck
色彩空间 sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms).

亮度和可视角度都很稳定,因此在户外也能真正发挥屏幕的作用。即使在阳光明媚的天气里,阅读内容也没有任何问题。

性能 - 配备骁龙 8 代 5 处理器的摩托罗拉 Signature

摩托罗拉签名版 骁龙 8 代 5.这不会给你带来绝对的顶级性能,但性能却在高端产品的视线范围之内。A 联发科 Dimensity 9500骁龙 8 精英 5 代性能要高得多。UFS 4.1 内存以其出色的数据吞吐量缩短了加载时间。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
3883 Points +34%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
3718 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3676 Points +26%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
3562 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3200 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (2908 - 3027, n=2)
2968 Points +2%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
2908 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=210, last 2 years)
1733 Points -40%
Multi-Core
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
11301 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
11004 Points +14%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10615 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (9678 - 10438, n=2)
10058 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10020 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
10017 Points +4%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
9678 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=210, last 2 years)
5097 Points -47%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
3095982 Points +37%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2750094 Points +22%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
2629691 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2262067 Points 0%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
2259643 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (n=1)
2259643 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3269237, n=136, last 2 years)
1483423 Points -34%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
24396 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (n=1)
24396 Points 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
22179 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20764 Points -15%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
18445 Points -24%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
17480 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=182, last 2 years)
14845 Points -39%
CrossMark - Overall
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
2722 Points +111%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2598 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2354 Points +83%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
1289 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (n=1)
1289 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2856, n=116, last 2 years)
1144 Points -11%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
15734 Points +49%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
14678 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13325 Points +27%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10620 Points +1%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
10533 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (n=1)
10533 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 16690, n=146, last 2 years)
7668 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
System
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
20996 Points +36%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
20150 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17171 Points +11%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
15639 Points +1%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
15456 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (n=1)
15456 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 21153, n=146, last 2 years)
11434 Points -26%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
Memory
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
22887 Points +114%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
18501 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17355 Points +62%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
13155 Points +23%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
10713 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (n=1)
10713 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 24052, n=146, last 2 years)
8756 Points -18%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
51530 Points +36%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
51366 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45562 Points +21%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
37773 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (n=1)
37773 Points 0%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
26660 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=146, last 2 years)
25938 Points -31%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
Web
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
2587 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2322 Points +18%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
2319 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2319 Points +18%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
1968 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (n=1)
1968 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2587, n=146, last 2 years)
1699 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
23281 Points +3%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
22592 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (n=1)
22592 Points 0%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
19373 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
19236 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=130, last 2 years)
18949 Points -16%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
37611 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=109, last 2 years)
20788 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1923 Points
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
1620 Points
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
5155 Points +1160%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
843 Points +106%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
733 Points +79%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=80, last 2 years)
683 Points +67%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
559 Points +37%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
409 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (n=1)
409 Points 0%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
36297 Points +8753%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=80, last 2 years)
2667 Points +550%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
843 Points +106%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
718 Points +75%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
561 Points +37%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
410 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (n=1)
410 Points 0%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
48828 Points +5356%
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=80, last 2 years)
3951 Points +341%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
1986 Points +122%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
1631 Points +82%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1285 Points +44%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
895 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (n=1)
895 Points 0%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=39, last 2 years)
645 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
240 Points
Score V6
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
22780 Points +30%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
21660 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
19229 Points +10%
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384
17520 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  (n=1)
17520 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10621 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 22780, n=84, last 2 years)
5362 Points -69%

二重奏 骁龙 8 代 5Adreno 826负责图形计算。在 GFXBench 4K Aztec Ruins 基准测试中,图形处理器每秒可运行 42 帧,证明它也能流畅运行图形非常复杂的游戏。不过,与 CPU 测试一样,它也不足以获得最高分。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
8102 Points +46%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7629 Points +38%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6959 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6907 Points +25%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
5959 Points +8%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5533 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
8072 Points +44%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7582 Points +35%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7021 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6845 Points +22%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6033 Points +7%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5613 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
30621 Points +45%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
30166 Points +43%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
26944 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26614 Points +26%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
26375 Points +25%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
21167 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
14869 Points +53%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
14225 Points +46%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
13036 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12395 Points +27%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
11776 Points +21%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
9725 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
15420 Points +59%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
14331 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12711 Points +31%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
12447 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
12242 Points +26%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
9698 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3208 Points +58%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3081 Points +52%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2704 Points +33%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2588 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2397 Points +18%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2032 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3253 Points +57%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3101 Points +49%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2736 Points +32%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2679 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2651 Points +28%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2078 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
937 fps +37%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
917 fps +34%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
748 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps +4%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
684 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
579 fps -15%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
531 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps +31%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
441 fps +23%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
410 fps +14%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
359 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
341 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
399 fps +41%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
346 fps +22%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
343 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
284 fps 0%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
283 fps
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
282 fps 0%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps +16%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +15%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps 0%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
104 fps
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -42%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
239 fps +43%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
207 fps +24%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
198 fps +19%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
193 fps +16%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
167 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
161 fps -4%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps +15%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +14%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +14%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
105 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps -5%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
127 fps +34%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +26%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
114 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +13%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
95 fps
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
86 fps -9%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
367 fps +53%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
361 fps +50%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
296 fps +23%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
247 fps +3%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
240 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
237 fps -1%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
62 fps +48%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
58 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +24%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50 fps +19%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
42 fps
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
36.4 fps -13%
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
358.295 Points +98%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
315.056 Points +74%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
304.63 Points +69%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)
180.603 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (n=1)
180.6 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)
165.891 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 358, n=143, last 2 years)
151.9 Points -16%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
643 runs/min +100%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
500 runs/min +56%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
425 runs/min +32%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)
321 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (n=1)
321 runs/min 0%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=113, last 2 years)
223 runs/min -31%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
42.8 runs/min +123%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
29.3 runs/min +53%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
27.6 runs/min +44%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)
25.1 runs/min +31%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)
19.2 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (n=1)
19.2 runs/min 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=123, last 2 years)
14.1 runs/min -27%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
306 Points +100%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
255 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
236 Points +54%
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)
216 Points +41%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)
153 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (n=1)
153 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=137, last 2 years)
143.2 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)
124 Points -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)
126661 Points +219%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
121337 Points +206%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
99202 Points +150%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
96438 Points +143%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)
58421 Points +47%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=188, last 2 years)
48100 Points +21%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)
39707 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (n=1)
39707 Points 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=149, last 2 years)
1172 ms * -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (n=1)
817 ms * -0%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)
816.8 ms *
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)
522.8 ms * +36%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
376.8 ms * +54%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
373.8 ms * +54%
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)
284.4 ms * +65%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
256.9 ms * +69%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola SignatureHonor Magic8 ProSamsung Galaxy S25 UltraVivo X300 ProXiaomi Poco F8 UltraAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-8%
-29%
-38%
-3%
-21%
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
4049.69
3942.69
-3%
3823.28
-6%
2041.82
-50%
4064.33
0%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
3774.28
3732.81
-1%
3361.24
-11%
1981.85
-47%
3987.65
6%
3236 ?(1240 - 4035, n=29)
-14%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
613.85
488.67
-20%
287.85
-53%
320.25
-48%
575.86
-6%
403 ?(279 - 614, n=29)
-34%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
628.08
587.11
-7%
331.61
-47%
593.74
-5%
551.82
-12%

排放 - 热签名

温度

Signature 在运行过程中会变得很热。当智能手机长时间处于满负荷状态时,表面温度最高可达 49.8 °C。3DMark 压力测试显示,性能最多会下降三分之一。

Max. Load
 46.6 °C47.4 °C44.8 °C 
 48.6 °C47.2 °C42.3 °C 
 48.5 °C47.5 °C43 °C 
Maximum: 48.6 °C
Average: 46.2 °C
42.9 °C46.7 °C46.5 °C
43.2 °C44.2 °C46.1 °C
42.9 °C48.1 °C49.8 °C
Maximum: 49.8 °C
Average: 45.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.6 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
99.8 % +50%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
66.6 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.9 % -18%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
52.3 % -21%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50 % -25%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
71.8 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.3 %
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50.7 %
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50.3 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
72.6 % +11%
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
65.3 %
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
51.6 % -21%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 % -24%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
49.5 % -24%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Signature
Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
67.4 %
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
64.7 % -4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.6 % -25%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
48.4 % -28%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
47 % -30%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø25 (22.7-31.7)
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø29.9 (22-43.5)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (21.9-41.9)
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø27.3 (21.9-43.5)
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø91.4 (83.9-125.9)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60 (59.9-60)
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø98.4 (78.1-156.3)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø91 (76-138.4)
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø88.6 (69.3-132.4)
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø110.3 (99.2-127.3)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø130.1 (116-160.6)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø122.8 (98.3-163.3)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø30.2 (26-40.5)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø27.5 (22.5-41.5)
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø23.7 (20.6-31.5)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø29.3 (26.6-36.7)
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø30 (21.5-41.7)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø26 (19.8-39.8)
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø29.1 (23.9-48.2)
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø12 (10.4-15.5)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.2 (12.6-19.5)
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø14.1 (10.3-21.3)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.4 (10-19.8)
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø14 (11-23.3)

发言人

摩托罗拉 Signature 支持杜比全景声和高保真音频。当通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接耳机等外部音频设备时,它能提供最佳音效。相比之下,立体声扬声器的音质显然要逊色一些,但考虑到其有限的功能,表现还是相当不错的。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs208.926.825926.93114.325.94018.428.85019.935.46318.129.5801929.910019.135.612519.142.416025.552.120030.653.825026.45931525.761.440023.461.65002159.863023.463.880021.965.1100023.762125023.569.9160026.973.3200029.979.5250031.678.4315028.373.640002480.5500025.774.7630030.478.4800034.378.61000036.476.71250036.171.91600034.853.6SPL41.788.2N3.570median 25.7median 69.9Delta3.6838.443.230.640.119.240.421.539.636.944.224.447.719.746.315.84714.150.615.260.112.459.29.560.99.763.410.566.4970.29.873.98.976.69.479.711.579.211.278.31283.911.783.41282.31282.912.58312.981.113.38013.578.613.569.513.665.623.9930.598.2median 12median 78.31.58.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola SignatureSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Signature audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 其他旗舰手机的电池续航时间更长

耗电量

配备硅碳阳极的 5200 毫安时锂电池充电功率可达 90 瓦特,在测试中只用了不到一个小时。摩托罗拉 Signature 支持 50 瓦特的无线充电,并可通过反向无线充电为其他设备充电,最高可达 10 瓦特。

摩托罗拉 Signature 的耗电量并不明显。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.3 / 1.7 Watt
Load midlight 11.8 / 18.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Signature
5200 mAh
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
4823 mAh
Honor Magic8 Pro
6270 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
Vivo X300 Pro
5440 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
6500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
27%
34%
22%
-13%
18%
0%
14%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.8
0.6
25%
0.58
28%
0.55
31%
0.86
-8%
0.87
-9%
0.8 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.3
1.3
-0%
0.74
43%
0.77
41%
1.8
-38%
1.29
1%
1.3 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.7
1.6
6%
0.75
56%
0.91
46%
1.86
-9%
1.33
22%
1.7 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Average * (Watt)
11.8
4.1
65%
11.35
4%
13.81
-17%
10.63
10%
8.84
25%
11.8 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
18.7
11.5
39%
11.87
37%
16.69
11%
21.99
-18%
9.15
51%
18.7 ?(n=1)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0510152025Tooltip
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.53 (1.649-27.2)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.59 (0.702-11.1)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.44 (0.757-16.7)
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.986 (0.802-2.54)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.941 (0.777-1.253)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.689 (0.646-0.893)

功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16.1 (14.3-17.6)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.8 (10.3-11.5)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.9 (12.7-16.6)
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.986 (0.802-2.54)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.941 (0.777-1.253)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.689 (0.646-0.893)

电池寿命

摩托罗拉智能手机的电池续航时间很长,但另一方面,它并没有达到新的峰值区域。在我们的无线局域网测试中,它的续航时间只有不到 20 个小时。iPhone Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max三星Galaxy S25 Ultra的续航时间要长得多。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 145)
19h 42min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Motorola Signature
5200 mAh
19.7 h
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
4823 mAh
28.6 h
Honor Magic8 Pro
6270 mAh
26.9 h
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
22.2 h
Vivo X300 Pro
5440 mAh
17.9 h
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
6500 mAh
21.9 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

摩托罗拉 Signature 有很多优点,包括出色的摄像头、明亮的显示屏、7 年的更新以及非常纤薄轻巧的机身。不过,其他旗舰智能手机在电池续航时间和处理器性能方面的优势更大。

评论中摩托罗拉签名版
ⓘ Notebookcheck
评论中摩托罗拉签名版

Motorola Signature - 02/26/2026 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
93%
Keyboard
71 / 75 → 95%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
63 / 69 → 91%
Weight
90%
Battery
92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
43 / 55 → 78%
Application Performance
80 / 85 → 94%
AI Performance
27%
Temperature
82%
Noise
100%
Audio
69 / 90 → 77%
Camera
88%
Average
71%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
100%
Power Use
96%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 59.3%

可比较的替代品

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
87.9%
Motorola Signature
Motorola Signature
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: List Price: 1000 Euro186 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.80"
2780x1264
450 PPI
AMOLED
2.
89.2%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro ⎘
Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe
List Price: 1449 Euro233 g256 GB NVMe6.90"
2868x1320
460 PPI
OLED
3.
89.3%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
List Price: 1300€219 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.71"
2808x1256
458 PPI
OLED
4.
89.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon: List Price: 1449€218 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"
3120x1440
498 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
5.
88.1%
Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘
Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
List Price: 1399€226 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.78"
2800x1260
453 PPI
AMOLED
6.
88.2%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
List Price: 900€220 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.90"
2608x1200
416 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉 Signature 评测:DxO 屡获殊荣,向Apple 和三星发起进攻
Manuel Masiero, 2026-03- 4 (Update: 2026-03- 4)