独具匠心的智能手机，相机创新与 SoC 的两难选择--Oppo Find X9 Pro 评测

Name: Oppo Find X9 Pro
Brand: Oppo

密度 9500 成为一个问题。

Find X9 Pro 拥有最好的硬件，采用几乎无边框的设计。尽管机身纤薄，这款高端手机却配备了超大硅碳电池。请阅读我们的评测，了解为什么进口 OPPO 智能手机是个不错的选择。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 11/09/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Wi-Fi 7 Smartphone Android

判决

Oppo 通过 Find X9 Pro 提高了标准。Find X8 Pro 的继任者在性能上有了明显的提升，并提供了一个全面的软件包，不必躲在Galaxy S25 Ultra 或 iPhone 17 Pro Max 的后面。相反，得益于最好的硬件包装和几乎无边框的设计，Oppo 的这款旗舰产品绝对是高端产品中的佼佼者。

全新的 LUMO 图像处理技术，尤其是其自动提供最大图像细节的方式，具有巨大的潜力，有望树立新的标准。OPPO 智能手机中的 Dimensity 9500 虽然有一些小弱点，但肯定能与包括骁龙 8 精英 5 代在内的竞争对手一较高下。

不过，Find X9 Pro 也表现出了非常明显的 SoC 跳频现象--在某些情况下，这款旗舰机的性能跳频几乎达到了 80%，这大大降低了我们的整体评分。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of tradingshenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

对于 Find X9 Pro 的潜在买家来说，特别有趣的是，与全球版本相比，中国版本几乎没有任何限制。除了价格更低之外，进口设备还具有一些优点，而不仅仅是缺点。

Pros

+ 明亮的 LTPO 面板

+ 超大电池

+ 高质量外壳，带 2 个附加按键

+ 出色的摄像头

+ 欧洲地区长期更新承诺

+ 快速 SoC

Cons

- 可持续性透明度不足

- 节流

- 相对笨重且棱角分明

Oppo Find X9 Pro 的价格和上市时间

Oppo Find X9 Pro 将登陆欧洲市场，配备 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间，零售价为 1,299 欧元（约合 1,500 美元），但只有炭灰色和白色两种颜色。

如果你想要更便宜的价格和更多的存储空间，或者只想拥有红色版本，也可以购买带有多语言包的 CN 机型。基本机型的起价为 5299 元人民币（约合 635 欧元-735 美元），进口机型的价格至少在780 欧元左右。

$7.99

Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible with Oppo Find X9 Pro Screen Protector Tempered Glass，Case Friendly [High-definition scratch-resistant, 9H hardness]

$7.82
KJYFOANI For Oppo Find X9 Pro (6.78") Screen Protector Tempered Galss, [2 Pack] High Clear [9H Hardness] [Bubble Free] Screen Tempered Glass Protective Film For
$6.87
FZZSZS (3-Pack Designed for Oppo Find X9 Pro Screen Protector, Anti Scratch 9H+ Tempered Glass Film, HD Easy Installation Bubble Free Screen Protector for Oppo Find X9 Pro (6.78")

判决
Oppo Find X9 Pro 的规格
手机壳 - 防水Android- IP69 等级手机
功能 - 配备快速 USB 3.2 接口的 Oppo 智能手机
软件 - OPPO Find X9 Pro，含Android 16 和长时间更新
通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Android- 配备 5G 和 WiFi 的手机 7
电话功能和语音质量 -Android 带 eSIM 卡的智能手机
相机 - 具有哈苏品牌的最佳硬件
配件和保修 - OPPO Find X9 Pro 随附电源适配器，但不包括欧洲市场
输入设备和操作 -Android- 带有超声波传感器的手机
显示屏 - 采用 LTPO 面板的 Oppo 智能手机
性能 - 搭载联发科 SoC 的Galaxy S25 Ultra 的替代产品
游戏 - Oppo Find X9 Pro 并不适合游戏玩家
排放 - 旗舰手机不会超热
电池寿命 -Android 配备硅碳电池的手机
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可比较的替代品

继 Find X8 Pro带来了一些引人注目的创新。首先是外观设计，Find X9 Pro 采用矩形摄像头模块，外观焕然一新。

此外，电池容量增至令人印象深刻的 7,500 mAh，芯片组也进行了更新。新的 Dimensity 9500再次采用联发科芯片，而联发科芯片是目前唯一真正能与骁龙 8 精英 5 代.

Oppo Find X9 Pro 的规格

Oppo Find X9 Pro

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 9500 8 x 2.7 - 4.2 GHz, Cortex-X930 Travis / Cortex-A730 6x Gelas

Graphics adapter

Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12

Memory

16 GB

Display

6.78 inch 19.5:9, 2772 x 1272 pixel 450 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, LTPO AMOLED, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 454 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast, Satellite connectivity support (1TB 16GB RAM model only)

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G: 850/900/1800/1900MHz; 3G: Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19; 4G FDD: Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/32/66/71; TDD: Band 38/39/40/41/42/48; 5G: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n71/n75/n76/n77/n78/n79, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 161.3 x 76.5

Battery

7500 mAh Silicon-Carbon

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.5, 7P, OIS, 1/1.28") + 50 MPix (f/2.0, 6P, ultrawide) + 200 MPix (f/2.1, 6P. OIS, tele, 3x optical zoom) + 2 MPix (f/2.4. monochrom)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.0, AF, 1/2.76")

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, case, USB cable, charger (CN version), ColorOS, 24 Months Warranty, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), Galileo (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), fanless, waterproof

Weight

224 g, Power Supply: 106 g

Price

1299 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

手机壳 - 防水Android- IP69 等级手机

Find X9 Pro 的一流做工令人印象深刻。正面采用大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 保护，具有很强的抗划痕和抗摔性。OPPO 没有说明背面使用了哪种材料。

8 毫米的纤薄外壳通过了 IP68 和 IP69 认证，手感很好，不过铝制边框与扁平的背面结合在一起显得棱角分明。Find X9 Pro 的重量为 224 克，也不算轻。

可定制的按键，例如用于 AI 助手或在振动和铃声之间切换的按键，以及用于快速访问相机应用程序的专用相机按键，都很实用。

这款旗舰手机的显示屏正面比超过 91%，给人留下了非常好的印象，边缘非常窄，仅约 1 毫米，确保了几乎无边框的外观。这也使得这款手机比 Find X8 Pro尽管显示屏尺寸相同。

尺寸比较

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Vivo X200 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Oppo Find X8 Pro Oppo Find X9 Pro DIN A6 ❌

功能 - 配备快速 USB 3.2 接口的 Oppo 智能手机

Find X9 Pro 在欧洲只有一种内存版本，而在中国则有多种选择（256 GB 至 1 TB）。无论是全球版还是中国版，都使用 LPDDR5X 内存，省略了速度稍快的 LPDDR5T；内部内存使用 UFS 4.1。

USB 端口支持快速 3.2 标准，包括图像输出和 OTG 功能。此外，还集成了一个 NFC 芯片和一个红外触发器。Find X9 Pro 没有配备超宽带无线技术。

软件 - OPPO Find X9 Pro，含Android 16 和长时间更新

在发布 Find X9 系列的同时，Oppo 还发布了基于Android 16 的全新 ColorOS 16。重点是通过智能资源分配提高速度和能效。

此外，还对设计进行了调整，以传达光影交错的效果，并允许不同的文件夹大小。用户现在可以将移动照片或视频设置为背景，并以全屏方式使用始终在线显示屏。

在测试期间，Oppo 将其 ColorOS 16 版本与 2025 年 10 月起的安全补丁相结合。对中国版本的软件支持计划还存在一些问号。选择全球版本的用户将获得 5 个主要Android 版本和 6 年更新的承诺。

可持续性

与谷歌或三星在透明度方面，Oppo 仍需努力。遗憾的是，目前还没有关于 Find X9 Pro 所用回收材料比例的具体信息。不过，据说超过 90% 的关键原材料（如钴和钕）都是回收材料。

重点不在于用户的可修复性，而且几乎无法检查。Find X9 Pro 未列入 EPREL 数据库。

包装显然不含塑料。根据可持续发展报告，45% 的纤维也应来自回收材料。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Android- 配备 5G 和 WiFi 的手机 7

虽然 Find X9 Pro 通过 WiFi 7 提供了最大可能的带宽，但中国版旗舰机不支持用于 WiFi 传输的 6 GHz 频段。与 Find X8 Pro的情况一样，全球代表应该能够处理这个问题。

与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用时，我们的测试样本只能在 2.4 和 5 GHz 频段内连接，不过由于在 5 GHz 频段内使用了 VHT160，我们的 WiFi 6E 路由器仍能实现高速传输。

根据数据表，Find X9 Pro 在欧洲和中国的频率支持方面没有重大差异。我们来自远东的 Oppo 手机也使用 LTE 频段 20 和 28，以及各种 5G 频率。因此，这款旗舰智能手机不会出现网络问题。

Networking
Oppo Find X9 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	932 (min: 738) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1461 (min: 1265) MBit/s ∼85%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 795) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1609 (min: 1520) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	933 (min: 846) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1620 (min: 1407) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼92%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	595 (min: 484) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1721 (min: 1348) MBit/s ∼100%
Vivo X200 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	644 (min: 520) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1561 (min: 1441) MBit/s ∼91%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	563 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1610 (min: 1480) MBit/s ∼99%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1093 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1293 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1446 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	719 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	746 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1355 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼87%

Oppo Find X8 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø563 (494-652)

Oppo Find X8 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1610 (1480-1722)

Oppo Find X9 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø932 (738-1248)

Oppo Find X9 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1461 (1265-1701)

为了测试日常生活中的定位精度，我们带着 Find X9 Pro 进行了一次短途骑行，并将测量值与 Garmin Venu 2 作为参照进行了比较。在最佳状态下，Oppo 手机的位置是通过双频 GNSS 和快速 Satfix 确定的，即使在建筑物内也是如此。

事实证明，这款高端智能手机在我们的实际测试路线中非常准确；即使在弯道或改变方向时，我们也只能检测到微小的误差。

电话功能和语音质量 -Android 带 eSIM 卡的智能手机

无论是免提模式还是听筒模式，Find X9 Pro 的通话质量都很清晰，音量也足够大。

提供 VoNR 和 VoLTE 以及 VoWifi。如果您想使用 eSIM 卡，必须选择全球版本，因为我们的中国版本只支持使用两张 nano-SIM 卡的经典双卡双待功能。

相机 - 具有哈苏品牌的最佳硬件

在正面，Find X9 Pro 使用了来自三星（S5KJN5）的全新 5000 万像素传感器，利用像素二进制方法取得了不错的效果。不过，更有趣的是背面的摄像头，采用哈苏品牌，尤其是全新的 5000 万像素主摄像头。

它采用了索尼的 1/1.28 英寸堆栈式传感器（LYT-828），由于采用了混合帧 HDR 技术，动态范围特别广。一个新功能是现在可以自动拍摄不同分辨率的照片，如 1200 万像素、2600 万像素和 5000 万像素--根据光照条件和温度，基于 ISP、NPU、GPU 和 CPU 单元的内部 LUMO 图像处理应能提供照片中可能的最佳细节。

日光下的效果非常好，照片的动态范围也确实一流。在弱光环境下拍摄的照片就不那么令人信服了，因为柔焦模糊了一些细节。白平衡偶尔也会出现问题，照片中会出现洋红色偏色。

在变焦照片方面，安装了一个配备 1/1.56 英寸传感器（ISOCELL HP5）的 200 万像素镜头，可实现 3 倍光学放大和微距功能。这意味着，Find X9 Pro 肯定无法达到顶级水平，尤其是在长焦段；不过，在 3 倍至 10 倍的变焦范围内，效果确实不错，这通常与日常使用息息相关。

从 Find X8 Pro 接管过来的超广角摄像头在质量方面稍弱一些。在这一点上，我们建议您参考我们全面的相机测试其中包含更多照片素材。

与哈苏的合作为 Find X9 Pro 提供了一些熟悉的功能，如 XPan 模式或具有 16 位 RAW 格式的哈苏大师模式。视频可以 UHD 格式录制，最高可达每秒 120 帧，也可选择 8K30 格式。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low Light Wide-angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在受控照明条件下，我们将索尼主相机的色彩还原与实际参考色彩进行对比分析。在 ColorChecker Passport 中，50MP 镜头显示出轻微的曝光过度。不过，我们只能识别出 Find X9 Pro 在色彩保真度方面的几个异常值（ΔE>10）。

配件和保修 - OPPO Find X9 Pro 随附电源适配器，但不包括欧洲市场

我们的中国版本附带一个保护套和快速充电电源适配器、一条充电线（USB-C 转 USB-A）、一个 SIM 卡针和一份快速入门指南。屏幕上还安装了贴膜。我们在深圳贸易公司借出的产品在交货范围内还增加了一个用于充电器的欧盟适配器。超级 VOOC 充电器不包括在全球版本中。

Find X9 Pro 的可选哈苏相机套件（包括保护盖、手柄和镜头）可将主相机变为具有 10 倍光学变焦的长焦相机，在欧洲的零售价为 549 欧元。作为进口产品，感兴趣的用户可以更低的价格购买到这些配件。不过，该相机套件不过，相机套件鉴于价格昂贵。

我们的进口设备提供 12 个月的保修期.如果需要保修，Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将智能手机寄往德国的收货地址。全球机型的保修期为 24 个月，但在德国没有正式发售。

输入设备和操作 -Android- 带有超声波传感器的手机

电容式触摸屏的采样率为 240 Hz，能快速响应输入。由于采用了 120 Hz 的面板，动画显示非常流畅。此外，还有溅水触摸和手套检测功能，这两项功能在测试中都能可靠地工作，触摸屏甚至能识别厚厚的聚酯手套。线性电机负责振动，可提供清晰的触觉反馈。

指纹传感器集成在 OLED 显示屏中，基于超声波技术，可以非常可靠地快速检测到我们的手指。在 2D 模式下，可通过前置摄像头的面部解锁功能进行生物识别解锁。

显示屏 - 采用 LTPO 面板的 Oppo 智能手机

6.78 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏的分辨率为 2,772 x 1,272 像素，因此清晰度高达 450 ppi。刷新率为 1 Hz 至 120 Hz 的 LTPO 面板亮度（HBM）应达到 1,800 尼特。

在我们的测量中，纯白显示屏的亮度约为 1,100 cd/m²。不过，OLED 面板在 APL18 模式下通常会表现出更明显的亮度，这与日常生活更为相关。Oppo 智能手机也是如此，其亮度为 1,785 cd/m²，符合制造商的规格要求。据报道，最大显示亮度为 3,200 尼特，可能是在播放 HDR 视频时的特定点。

Find X9 Pro 的 OLED 技术使用脉宽调制来控制屏幕亮度。根据制造商的说法，它提供 2,160 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光，从而将闪烁的负面影响降至最低。我们使用 Rigol 软件测量的基本频率为 466 Hz。


1076 cd/m²	1094 cd/m²	1100 cd/m²
1063 cd/m²	1105 cd/m²	1085 cd/m²
1077 cd/m²	1055 cd/m²	1099 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1105 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1083.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1105 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.02 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.244
CCT: 6411 K

	Oppo Find X9 Pro LTPO AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"	Xiaomi 17 Pro Max AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"	Oppo Find X8 Ultra AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"	Vivo X200 Ultra AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"	Oppo Find X8 Pro AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"
Screen		-5%	-53%	14%	3%	10%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1105	1099 -1%	1357 23%	1366 24%	1286 16%	1167 6%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1084	1067 -2%	1350 25%	1325 22%	1238 14%	1160 7%
Brightness Distribution (%)	95	95 0%	94 -1%	95 0%	93 -2%	98 3%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.02	1.05 -3%	3.1 -204%	0.88 14%	1.04 -2%	0.87 15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.32	2.38 -3%	4.7 -103%	1.55 33%	2.26 3%	1.64 29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.4	1.7 -21%	2.2 -57%	1.5 -7%	1.6 -14%	1.4 -0%
Gamma	2.244 ^98%	2.232 ^99%	2 ^110%	2.303 ^96%	2.249 ^98%	2.311 ^95%
CCT	6411 ^101%	6779 ^96%	6391 ^102%	6626 ^98%	6575 ^99%	6426 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

465.6 Hz
Amplitude: 17 %

The display backlight flickers at 465.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 465.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

ColorOS 3 的色彩显示设置选项并不丰富，但包括色温选择在内的三个配置文件应该足以满足大多数用户的需求。

我们使用卡尔曼分析软件检查了偏差。在 "标准 "配置文件中，选择了 sRGB 色彩空间，几乎完全覆盖。肉眼无法看到各色彩之间的差异，测得的 DeltaE 值也非常低。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6 ms rise
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.5 ms rise
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

可视角度的稳定性非常吸引人，色彩也保持不变。只是在平视角度下亮度略有下降。

Find X9 Pro 在室外仍然非常易于阅读，但显示屏玻璃光面的反光会降低可读性。

性能 - 搭载联发科 SoC 的Galaxy S25 Ultra 的替代产品

Find X9 Pro 基于联发科 Dimensity 9500处理器，该处理器基于全新的 ARM v9.3 架构，采用 C1 Ultra Prime 内核，主频高达 4.21 GHz。

在 Geekbench 中的单核性能略逊于骁龙 8 精英 5 代中的小米 17 Pro Max.不过，由于配备了三个 C1 Premium 内核（3.5 GHz）和四个 C1 Pro 内核（2.7 GHz），多线程性能不相上下。

Find X9 Pro 在 PCMark 系统基准测试和人工智能测试中的表现出人意料地弱。后者一直是 Dimensity 芯片的强项。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3640 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3511 - 3635, n=2)	3573 Points +2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	3511 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3200 Points -9%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	3145 Points -10%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2976 Points -15%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	2605 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=212, last 2 years)	1732 Points -51%
Multi-Core
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (10378 - 10941, n=2)	10660 Points +3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	10620 Points +2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	10378 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10020 Points -3%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	9722 Points -6%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	9284 Points -11%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	7480 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=212, last 2 years)	5055 Points -51%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	2981365 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	2981365 Points 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2845517 Points -5%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2760009 Points -7%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2390211 Points -20%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	2374537 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2262067 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=154, last 2 years)	1456001 Points -51%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	20764 Points +49%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	19833 Points +42%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	18897 Points +35%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	15938 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=190, last 2 years)	14716 Points +5%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	13977 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	13977 Points 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	12314 Points -12%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	13325 Points +24%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	12929 Points +20%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	11073 Points +3%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	10756 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	10756 Points 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	10697 Points -1%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	8155 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14076, n=149, last 2 years)	7494 Points -30%
System
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	18137 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17171 Points +10%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	15554 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	15554 Points 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	15326 Points -1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	12891 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=149, last 2 years)	11236 Points -28%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	10953 Points -30%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17355 Points +111%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	13505 Points +64%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	11234 Points +36%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	9432 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=149, last 2 years)	8485 Points +3%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	8243 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	8243 Points 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	7081 Points -14%
Graphics
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	384996 Points +688%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	56004 Points +15%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	53231 Points +9%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	48863 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	48863 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	45562 Points -7%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	42332 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=149, last 2 years)	25088 Points -49%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2322 Points +10%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2143 Points +2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	2109 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	2109 Points 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2095 Points -1%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	1923 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=149, last 2 years)	1677 Points -20%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	1477 Points -30%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384	75143 Points +346%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	23281 Points +38%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	22372 Points +33%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	21543 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=139, last 2 years)	19717 Points +17%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	16866 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	16866 Points 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	12176 Points -28%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone (81 - 5210, n=47, last 2 years)	877 Points +357%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	524 Points +173%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	192 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	192 Points 0%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=47, last 2 years)	4071 Points +2213%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	486 Points +176%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	176 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	176 Points 0%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=47, last 2 years)	5808 Points +1232%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	974 Points +123%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	436 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	436 Points 0%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=43, last 2 years)	884 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	240 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	14336 Points +1774%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	12567 Points +1543%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10621 Points +1288%
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22149, n=71, last 2 years)	4454 Points +482%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	765 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	765 Points 0%

ARM Mali G1-Ultra GPU ARM Mali G1-Ultra GPU拥有 12 个核心，性能强劲，但由于散热问题，Find X9 Pro 似乎无法充分发挥其潜力。这在要求苛刻的 GFXBench 测试中尤为明显。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7198 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6907 Points -4%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6743 Points -6%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6691 Points -7%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	6168 Points -14%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5383 Points -25%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7167 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6845 Points -4%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6722 Points -6%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6684 Points -7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6303 Points -12%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	6289 Points -12%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26614 Points +2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	25978 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	25847 Points -1%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	25127 Points -3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	23088 Points -11%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14788 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12395 Points -16%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	12239 Points -17%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11973 Points -19%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	10958 Points -26%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9461 Points -36%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14635 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12711 Points -13%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	12227 Points -16%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11983 Points -18%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	10886 Points -26%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9553 Points -35%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3198 Points
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	2571 Points -20%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2538 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2397 Points -25%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1998 Points -38%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3211 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2651 Points -17%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	2589 Points -19%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2584 Points -20%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2054 Points -36%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	954 fps
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	788 fps -17%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	776 fps -19%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	744 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	713 fps -25%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	537 fps -44%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps +7%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	606 fps
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	487 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	472 fps -22%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	469 fps -23%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	411 fps -32%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	327 fps -46%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	110 fps +83%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	369 fps
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	344 fps -7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	341 fps -8%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	324 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	284 fps -23%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	232 fps -37%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	104 fps +73%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	85 fps +42%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	216 fps +9%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	212 fps +7%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	199 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	172 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	161 fps -19%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	126 fps -37%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	100 fps +67%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	100 fps +67%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	92 fps +53%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	118 fps +8%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	118 fps +8%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	109 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps -2%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	98 fps -10%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	65 fps -40%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	107 fps +78%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	332 fps +16%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	321 fps +12%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	287 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	247 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	237 fps -17%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	203 fps -29%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	53 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps +8%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps +8%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	48 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	41 fps -15%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	35 fps -27%

Oppo 手机的高速浏览器给人留下了深刻印象。网站加载迅速，滚动流畅。不过，Find X9 Pro 的基准测试结果相对较弱。不过，这可能只与中国版本有关。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Vivo X200 Ultra	288.437 Points +22%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	236 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)	235.769 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 469, n=41, last 2 years)	224 Points -5%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)	205.435 Points -13%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	29.3 runs/min +64%
Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137)	22.6 runs/min +26%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)	20.9 runs/min +17%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)	17.9 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	17.9 runs/min 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)	16.3 runs/min -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=123, last 2 years)	14.3 runs/min -20%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)	278 Points +116%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	236 Points +83%
Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137)	150 Points +16%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)	147 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=149, last 2 years)	144.7 Points +12%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)	135 Points +5%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)	129 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	129 Points 0%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)	99417 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	99202 Points +33%
Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137)	91563 Points +23%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)	74649 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	74649 Points 0%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)	60987 Points -18%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)	59387 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=202, last 2 years)	48385 Points -35%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=157, last 2 years)	1183 ms * -135%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)	625.4 ms * -24%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)	612.34 ms * -22%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	504 ms * -0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)	503.8 ms *
Vivo X200 Ultra	417.65 ms * +17%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	376.8 ms * +25%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)	305.9 ms * +39%

* ... smaller is better

这款旗舰手机采用了 UFS 4.1，内存速度很快。然而，写入率却特别低。这更可能是由于 Dimensity 9500 的内存控制器而非内存硬件造成的。

	Oppo Find X9 Pro	Xiaomi 17 Pro Max	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra	Oppo Find X8 Ultra	Vivo X200 Ultra	Oppo Find X8 Pro	Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		126%	64%	82%	83%	37%	88%	22%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3219.8	3971.4 23%	3823.28 19%	3754.43 17%	3358.64 4%	3482.9 8%	3893 ?(3220 - 4110, n=16) 21%	2211 ?(270 - 4370, n=194, last 2 years) -31%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	1239.76	3899.9 215%	3361.24 171%	3564.22 187%	2998.87 142%	3498.5 182%	3315 ?(1240 - 4035, n=16) 167%	1827 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=194, last 2 years) 47%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	367.54	548.4 49%	287.85 -22%	375.9 2%	462.41 26%	375.7 2%	377 ?(280 - 488, n=16) 3%	294 ?(47.6 - 548, n=194, last 2 years) -20%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	176.98	561.3 217%	331.61 87%	389.28 120%	459.33 160%	100.4 -43%	458 ?(48.2 - 678, n=16) 159%	337 ?(9.4 - 964, n=194, last 2 years) 90%

游戏 - Oppo Find X9 Pro 并不适合游戏玩家

通过GameBench 软件，我们来看看全新 Mali G1-Ultra 在游戏中的表现如何。.在系统要求较低或最低图形设置的游戏中，Find X9 Pro 目前可达到 90 fps。要求苛刻的《玄心冲击》在最高图形设置下显示为 60 fps，这是Android 上目前可能的最高设置。

Oppo Find X9 Pro; Dead Trigger 2: Ø60.2 (57-61)

Oppo Find X9 Pro; Genshin Impact: Ø60.4 (54-61)

Oppo Find X9 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (57-61)

Oppo Find X9 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.6 (36-41)

排放 - 旗舰手机不会超热

温度

在我们的测量中，表面温度并不低，但与竞争对手相比，散热能力有限。不过，在 3DMark 压力测试中，Find X9 Pro 有时会出现近 80% 的明显性能损失。不过，除了基准测量之外，我们在测试过程中并未发现任何性能异常。

Max. Load

Idle


46.2 °C	44 °C	41.5 °C
46.7 °C	45.6 °C	41.3 °C
47.3 °C	45.3 °C	41.3 °C

Maximum: 47.3 °C
Average: 44.4 °C


39.5 °C	41.5 °C	41.6 °C
40 °C	43 °C	42.8 °C
40.3 °C	41.7 °C	47 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 41.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.1 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.3 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	99.6 %
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	92.3 % -7%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	81.4 % -18%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	60.3 % -39%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.9 % -40%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.9 % -45%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	88.9 % +130%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	65.2 % +68%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 % +50%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.8 % +49%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52.3 % +35%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	38.7 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	94 % +356%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	74.8 % +263%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	69.7 % +238%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55.5 % +169%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49.7 % +141%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	20.6 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	93.6 % +121%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	71.7 % +69%
Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	61 % +44%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	50.6 % +19%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	42.4 %

Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø32 (16.9-43.6)

Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø28.1 (22.2-38.3)

Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø77.9 (77.8-78.1)

Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø67 (63.3-68.6)

Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø31.5 (10.5-51)

Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28.3 (21.7-39.1)

Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø18.5 (9.82-23.1)

Oppo Find X8 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.3 (11.1-18.3)

发言人

Oppo 手机依靠双扬声器系统实现了良好的播放质量，包括轻微的低音。粉红噪声测量显示中音的频率曲线有所上升，只有超级高音扬声器出现了明显的衰减。

如果要在外出时使用耳机进行外部声音输出，Find X9 Pro 提供 USB 端口或无线蓝牙 6.0。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oppo Find X9 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Oppo Find X8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 -Android 配备硅碳电池的手机

耗电量

OPPO 旗舰智能手机采用硅碳电池，兼容 OPPO Mag，容量高达 7,500 mAh（28.13 Wh）。不过，该制造商仅承诺最低电池寿命为 1,300 次循环。

该设备的最大充电功率为 80 瓦，无线充电功率为 50 瓦。在测试中，我们只需要一个多小时就能用相应的电源装置为 Find X9 Pro 充满电。如果你想为入耳式耳机供电，可以启动 10 瓦反向充电。

在我们的测量中，联发科 SoC 的功耗较低，尽管前代产品的功耗略低。原因可能是 GPU 的功耗增加了。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idle	0.6 / 1 / 1.3 Watt
Load	6.9 / 11.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Oppo Find X9 Pro 7500 mAh	Xiaomi 17 Pro Max 7500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh	Oppo Find X8 Ultra 6100 mAh	Vivo X200 Ultra 6000 mAh	Oppo Find X8 Pro 5910 mAh	Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		8%	-16%	-18%	-132%	12%	0%	-21%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.6	0.6 -0%	0.55 8%	0.8 -33%	1.6 -167%	0.6 -0%	0.6 ?(n=1) -0%	0.853 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=162, last 2 years) -42%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1	0.8 20%	0.77 23%	1.1 -10%	2.9 -190%	0.8 20%	1 ?(n=1) -0%	1.43 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=162, last 2 years) -43%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.3	1.4 -8%	0.91 30%	1.6 -23%	3.7 -185%	0.9 31%	1.3 ?(n=1) -0%	1.609 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=162, last 2 years) -24%
Load Average * (Watt)	6.9	6.5 6%	13.81 -100%	8.5 -23%	10.6 -54%	6.8 1%	6.9 ?(n=1) -0%	7.09 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=142, last 2 years) -3%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	11.9	9.1 24%	16.69 -40%	11.8 1%	19.5 -64%	10.9 8%	11.9 ?(n=1) -0%	11.2 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=142, last 2 years) 6%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.47 (0.883-11.9)

Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.9 (0.652-11.1)

Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.772 (0.63-1.05)

Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.685 (0.559-0.896)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.6 (11.4-11.7)

Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.6 (10.5-10.8)

Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.772 (0.63-1.05)

Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.685 (0.559-0.896)

电池寿命

在我们的实际电池测试中，在将显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m² 的情况下，Oppo 旗舰机型的大容量储能使其获得了出色的续航时间。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，Find X9 Pro 的续航时间超过 34 小时，正常使用时只需每隔一天插一次电源即可，如果不经常使用，续航时间甚至更短。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 141)		34h 19min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 58min

	Oppo Find X9 Pro 7500 mAh	Xiaomi 17 Pro Max 7500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh	Oppo Find X8 Ultra 6100 mAh	Vivo X200 Ultra 6000 mAh	Oppo Find X8 Pro 5910 mAh
Battery runtime		1%	-31%	-33%	-32%	-14%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	34.3	33.8 -1%	22.2 -35%	22.9 -33%	23.3 -32%	23.5 -31%
Load (h)	5	5.1 2%	3.7 -26%			5.2 4%
Reader / Idle (h)		70.2	45.8			61.1
H.264 (h)		34.8	32.3	33.5		32.9

Notebookcheck 总体评分

凭借 Find X9 Pro，Oppo 推出了 X8 Pro 当之无愧的继任者。由于中国和欧洲的机型版本略有不同，用户可以根据个人需求选择最合适的套餐。

Back to the verdict

Oppo Find X9 Pro - 11/07/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

70 / 75 → 94%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

66 / 69 → 96%

Weight

87%

Battery

97%

Display

93%

Games Performance

34 / 55 → 63%

Application Performance

74 / 85 → 87%

AI Performance

12%

Temperature

84%

Noise

100%

Audio

78 / 90 → 87%

Camera

88%

Average

69%

88%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
40%

Packaging
70%

Power Use
95.4%

Repairability
30%

Software Updates
90%

Total Sustainability Score: 54.2%

可比较的替代品

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 87.7%	Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 2. $7.82 KJYFOANI For Oppo Find X9 Pr... 3. $6.87 FZZSZS (3-Pack Designed for ... List Price: 1299€	224 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI LTPO AMOLED
2. 89%	Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB	Amazon: 1. $9.90 Anbzsign 2+1 Pack for Xiaomi... 2. $8.98 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... 3. $6.98 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 940€	219 g	1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED
3. 89.4%	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $7.98 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 2. $13.59 AACL 3-Pack for Samsung Gala... 3. $7.98 Ailun Glass Screen Protector... List Price: 1449€	218 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.90" 3120x1440 498 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4. 90.7%	Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 2. $15.99 AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... 3. $11.02 [1-Pack] for Oppo Find X8 Ul... List Price: 1050€	226 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.82" 3168x1440 510 PPI AMOLED
5. 88.3%	Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB	Amazon: 1. $17.12 YQINHHME for Vivo X200 Ultra... 2. $13.92 HGJTFANY [3 Pcs Screen Prote... 3. AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... List Price: 890€	229 g	1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.82" 3168x1440 510 PPI AMOLED
6. 87.3%	Oppo Find X8 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $6.37 [1-Pack] for Oppo Find X8 Pr... 2. AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... 3. $11.79 TNKISRY Cover for Oppo Find ... List Price: 1199€	215 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.78" 2780x1264 450 PPI AMOLED

独具匠心的智能手机，相机创新与 SoC 的两难选择--Oppo Find X9 Pro 评测

密度 9500 成为一个问题。

判决

Pros

Cons

Oppo Find X9 Pro 的价格和上市时间

Table of Contents

Oppo Find X9 Pro 的规格

手机壳 - 防水Android- IP69 等级手机

尺寸比较

功能 - 配备快速 USB 3.2 接口的 Oppo 智能手机

软件 - OPPO Find X9 Pro，含Android 16 和长时间更新

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Android- 配备 5G 和 WiFi 的手机 7

电话功能和语音质量 -Android 带 eSIM 卡的智能手机

相机 - 具有哈苏品牌的最佳硬件

配件和保修 - OPPO Find X9 Pro 随附电源适配器，但不包括欧洲市场

输入设备和操作 -Android- 带有超声波传感器的手机

显示屏 - 采用 LTPO 面板的 Oppo 智能手机

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 搭载联发科 SoC 的Galaxy S25 Ultra 的替代产品

游戏 - Oppo Find X9 Pro 并不适合游戏玩家

排放 - 旗舰手机不会超热

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Oppo Find X9 Pro audio analysis

Oppo Find X8 Pro audio analysis

电池寿命 -Android 配备硅碳电池的手机

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可比较的替代品

More articles related to this device

Transparency