Notebookcheck Logo
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）

配备 XXL 电池的旗舰机型 -Honor Magic8 Pro 智能手机评测

按比例缩小的电池。

Honor 推出了全新的高端智能手机 Magic8 Pro。它的机身略显小巧，但仍能配备大容量电池、顶级 SoC 和强大的摄像头。它的整体性能非常出色，但我们的测试也发现了一些缺点。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

结论 -Honor Magic8 Pro

在我们的测试中，Honor Magic8 Pro 证明了自己是一款几乎完整的旗舰设备，其优质的制造质量、IP69K 认证以及亮度超过 6,000 cd/m² 的鲜艳 LTPO OLED 显示屏给我们留下了深刻印象。Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 性能卓越，但在持续负载情况下会出现明显的跳动。其他亮点包括七年更新保证、多功能 AI 功能（包括 AI 按钮）以及包括超声波指纹传感器和 3D 面部识别在内的全面安全选项。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

该相机给我们留下了深刻印象，照片细节细腻，潜望镜变焦功能强大，图像防抖效果良好，尽管缺少了前代产品的可变光圈，默认设置也倾向于明亮、鲜艳的图像。尽管欧盟缩减了电池容量，但 6270 毫安时的电池仍能提供出色的续航时间，并能以高达 100 瓦的功率快速充电。目前速度较慢的 Wi-Fi 7 和缺少 UWB 芯片等弱点稍稍影响了整体印象，但并没有削弱 Magic8 Pro 作为一款极具吸引力的Android 旗舰产品的地位。

Pros

+ 高性能
+ 全面的 IP 认证
+ 长期更新支持
+ 出色的电池续航能力
+ 良好的摄像头设置
+ 3D 人脸识别和超声波指纹传感器

Cons

- 无 UWB
- 欧洲电池容量较小
- 负载情况下性能大幅下降
- 无气压计

价格和供应情况

Magic8 Pro 可直接在亚马逊网站上购买。(英国）。

Magic8 Pro 在亚洲上市已有一段时间（正如我们之前报道的那样），现在它作为 Magic7 Pro 的全球继任者亮相了。 Magic7 Pro.遗憾的是，欧洲版的电池容量明显较小，存储空间也有限。

尽管如此，该手机的电池容量相对较大，续航时间也较长。在英国，这款智能手机只提供本文评测的存储配置，建议零售价约为 1,049 英镑。

规格 -Honor Magic8 Pro

Honor Magic8 Pro (Magic8 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8 x 3.6 - 4.6 GHz
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 840
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.71 inch 20:9, 2808 x 1256 pixel 458 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, 4320Hz PWM Dimming, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, NanoCrystal Shield, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 484.39 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 161.2 x 75
Battery
6270 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode, two cells
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (1/1.3", f/1.6, 23 mm, OIS) + 200 MPix (3.7x optical zoom, 1/1.4", f/2.6, 85 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (Ultra Wide / Macro, f/2.0, 12 mm); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.0, 21 mm) + 3D Depth Camera
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, USB-C-Cabel, SIM-Tool, MagicOS 10, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3, LHDC 5.0, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B2a, B2b, B1C), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid | DRM Widevine L1 | up to 2 Nano-SIM, up to 2 eSIM | IP68 / / IP69 / IP69K | USB Copy Test: 395.9 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: 1.0 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.97 W/kg | max. charging speed: 100 W (wired) / 80 W (wireless), fanless, waterproof
Released
10/15/2025
Weight
219 g
Price
1300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

手机壳 -Honor 智能手机变得更轻了

每种颜色（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
每种颜色

Honor Magic8 Pro 有黑色、日出金色和天青色三种颜色，标称厚度为 8.3 毫米（我们测量的厚度为 8.45 毫米），包括摄像头在内为 14.4 毫米。这使得它比上一代机型 Magic7 Pro的厚度略薄，如果不包括摄像头，则最薄处为 13.35 毫米（包括摄像头）。

磨砂边框让 Magic8 Pro 看起来更有质感，而且不易沾染指纹。它的制造质量令人印象深刻，各部件之间的间隙一致且紧密。扭动时，智能手机只会发出轻微的吱吱声。

Magic8 Pro 通过了 IP69K 认证，这意味着它可以防尘、防水、防蒸汽和高压清洗。

尺寸比较

❌
163.33 mm 77.82 mm 8.3 mm 220 g162.7 mm 77.1 mm 8.8 mm 223 g162.8 mm 77.6 mm 8.2 mm 218 g161.98 mm 75.48 mm 7.99 mm 226 g161.2 mm 75 mm 8.3 mm 219 g150 mm 71.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 现配备 Auracast

Magic8 Pro 的技术规格与前代产品非常相似：USB 3.2（带视频输出）、红外爆破器和 Wi-Fi 7。蓝牙已升级到 6.0 版本，现在支持 Auracast，即Honor 设置中的 "音频共享"。

不过，UWB 仍未加入。

软件 - Magic8 Pro 的七年更新

Magic8 Pro 预装了 GoogleAndroid 16 和 MagicOS 10 用户界面。此外，还包括大量人工智能功能，如深度伪造检测和今年的新功能：人工智能代理。

安全补丁是最新的，根据以往经验，第一年通常每月发布一次更新，之后每季度发布一次。有时 Magic7 Pro的延迟时间更长，但不久后它也收到了 MagicOS 10 的更新。

可持续性

Honor 智能手机采用超薄无塑料外包装盒。不过，该公司没有提供有关其可持续性的信息。在欧洲，Magic8 Pro 将在七年内接受安全和版本更新。

如果出现损坏，不支持用户维修。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 令人惊讶的 Wi-Fi 网速缓慢

Magic8 Pro 采用 Wi-Fi 7，支持目前最先进的 Wi-Fi 标准，覆盖所有三个频段。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 搭配使用时，数据传输速度虽然稳定，但相对较慢。Honor 可能会通过更新来解决这个问题。如果出现这种情况，我们将提供最新的测量结果。

这款智能手机支持所有现代移动网络标准，频率范围广。

Networking
Honor Magic8 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
976 (min: 951) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
580 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1856 (min: 1812) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
791 (min: 773) MBit/s ∼44%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
834 (min: 647) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
824 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1667 (min: 1563) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1216 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼82%
Vivo X300 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
977 (min: 956) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
917 (min: 834) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1866 (min: 1793) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1806 (min: 1725) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
989 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
946 (min: 814) MBit/s ∼63%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
942 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1051 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1280 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1447 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
706 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
730 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1303 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1379 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼76%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1856 (1812-1896)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1667 (1563-1686)
Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø790 (773-809)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1215 (1179-1261)
Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (951-1002)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (647-963)
Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø579 (475-641)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (780-864)
GPS 测试：户外
户外活动
GPS 测试：室内
室内

在室外，GPS 定位既快又准确。但在室内，它的性能可能相当不准确，而且会有波动。

在一次自行车旅行中，我们将 Magic8 Pro 与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较，智能手机对路线的跟踪相当准确，但不如健身智能手表精确。不过，就导航而言，这完全足够了。

全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：城市
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：城市
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结

电话功能和语音质量

Honor Magic8 Pro 可容纳两张 nano-SIM 卡或最多两张 eSIM 卡。该设备支持 Wi-Fi 通话、VoLTE 和 Vo5G 等标准。

将手机贴在耳边时，通话质量非常自然，即使是嘈杂的背景噪音也能可靠地消除。免提电话提供了良好的音质，但麦克风的音域还可以更好一些。

相机 - 可变光圈已成为历史

与Honor Magic8 Pro 自拍合影
与Honor Magic8 Pro 自拍合影

Honor Magic8 Pro 的前置摄像头可提供高分辨率图像，采用像素二进制技术，并使用 3D 深度传感器辅助对焦。因此，自拍照的细节和清晰度都非常吸引人。录制视频的最高帧率可达 4K/60fps，但会显得有些过度处理。降低帧频至 30fps 则可以录制更多细节。

在主摄像头方面，Honor 取消了可变光圈。 Magic7 Pro(f/1.4 - f/2.0），Magic8 Pro 使用 f/1.6 的固定光圈。不过，Magic8 Pro 的新功能是 CIPA 5.5 光学防抖，我们已经从 vivo X300 Pro.我们还进行了 照片对比两款智能手机的照片。

我们的测试结果显示，该机的图像质量令人印象深刻，拍摄的照片具有令人愉悦的细节。不过，默认设置导致图像明显变亮，色彩过于饱和。喜欢不同效果的用户可以在设置中进行调整。

超广角镜头的效果可以接受，还能用作微距镜头。不过，景深和边缘细节有些柔和。

经过优化的潜望镜变焦能拍摄出良好的照片，即使在光线不足的情况下也能满足大多数需求。最大放大倍率可达 100 倍，可选择通过人工智能增强放大倍率。这在拍摄物体时通常效果很好，但在拍摄人物或更复杂的物体时效果就差一些。

超高清视频录制速度高达 120fps，并具有良好的图像防抖功能。录制的音频也给我们留下了深刻的印象。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light
ColorChecker
6.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic8 Pro: 5.55 ∆E min: 0.99 - max: 8.94 ∆E
ColorChecker
18.6 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic8 Pro: 23.72 ∆E min: 11.65 - max: 31.71 ∆E

配件和保修 - 挑选余地小

Honor Magic8 Pro 只配备了一条 USB-C 数据线和一个 SIM 卡工具。电源适配器和保护套必须单独购买，可在亚马逊等多家网上商店购买。

德国的保修期为 24 个月。

输入设备和操作 - Magic8 Pro 拥有一个 AI 按钮

Magic8 Pro 的电容式触摸屏触感顺滑，输入精准。显示屏上集成了超声波指纹传感器，可快速解锁智能手机，识别率极高。此外，Honor 智能手机仍然是运行Android 的同类产品中唯一一款提供 3D 人脸识别功能的手机，同样具有快速、准确和安全的特点。

新的 AI 按钮在外观上与 iPhone 的相机按键相似，但其功能也包括 iPhone 的动作按键，可以区分三种不同的按压手势。每种手势都可以分配不同的功能。默认情况下，长按会启动人工智能概览，显示人工智能提醒和圈选搜索。后者的访问方式并不繁琐，而且可以在设置中进行大量自定义。

线性振动电机可提供清晰的反馈，如果需要，还可以提供非常明显的反馈。

显示屏 - 6,000 cd/m² 以上，便于观看

子像素结构
子像素结构

6.71 英寸（17.04 厘米）OLED 屏幕可显示清晰的图像，支持所有 HDR 标准，并可在 1 至 120 Hz 之间调节刷新率。

Magic8 Pro 的峰值亮度略高于 6,000 cd/m²，这完全是通过 HDR 内容实现的，但即使是较小的白色区域（APL18：3,233 cd/m²），Magic8 Pro 也能保持高亮度。

高频 PWM 调光功能使该面板成为同类产品中对眼睛比较友好的 OLED 面板。不过，由于基频为 120 Hz，对此类问题敏感的用户不能完全排除不适感。Honor 还包括许多其他功能，以保护用户的眼睛，甚至可以消除晕动症。

1863
cd/m²		1816
cd/m²		1789
cd/m²
1869
cd/m²		1809
cd/m²		1778
cd/m²
1858
cd/m²		1812
cd/m²		1793
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1869 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1820.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.07 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1809 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 6446 K
Honor Magic8 Pro
OLED, 2808x1256, 6.7"		Apple iPhone 17 Pro
OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"		Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"		Vivo X300 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"		Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"		Honor Magic7 Pro
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"
Screen
-21%
-49%
-7%
-4%
8%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1809
1059
-41%
1357
-25%
1574
-13%
1771
-2%
1607
-11%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1821
1060
-42%
1350
-26%
1562
-14%
1773
-3%
1609
-12%
Brightness Distribution (%)
95
99
4%
94
-1%
93
-2%
99
4%
95
0%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.3
-8%
3.1
-158%
1.3
-8%
1.3
-8%
0.9
25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.9
3.6
-24%
4.7
-62%
2.7
7%
2.8
3%
1.8
38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
2.1
-17%
2.2
-22%
2
-11%
2.1
-17%
1.7
6%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
2 110%
2.26 97%
2.25 98%
2.24 98%
CCT
6446 101%
6542 99%
6391 102%
6709 97%
6452 101%
6346 102%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3519 cd/m² +9%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3233 cd/m²
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
3044 cd/m² -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2613 cd/m² -19%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2329 cd/m² -28%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1634 cd/m² -49%
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6045 cd/m²
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4697 cd/m² -22%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3458 cd/m² -43%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
2997 cd/m² -50%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2785 cd/m² -54%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2768 cd/m² -54%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 12.82 %
Secondary Frequency: 4347 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8083 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

以固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

在我们的测试中，当选择专业色彩模式和暖色温设置时，色彩还原最为自然。虽然卡尔曼测量结果比前代产品稍差，但肉眼无法察觉这一差异。

灰度（颜色：专业，色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（颜色：专业，色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（颜色：专业，色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（颜色：专业，色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩：专业，色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩：专业，色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5055 ms rise
↘ 0.536 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.324 ms rise
↘ 0.306 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).

在户外，Honor Magic8 Pro 的表现令人印象深刻，在任何情况下都能轻松阅读。唯一缺少的就是防反射屏幕。

面板的可视角度稳定性非常好，在广视角下亮度仅略有下降。

户外活动
户外活动
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - Magic8 Pro 配备了骁龙 8 精英 5 代处理器

DasHonor Magic8 Pro 采用最新的 骁龙 8 第五代精英版性能。这款智能手机在峰值性能基准测试中也取得了非常好的成绩。不过，它无法长期保持这一水平（见温度）。

Geekbench 6.5 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
3803 Points +2%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
3718 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3676 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (3498 - 3831, n=10)
3669 Points -1%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
3562 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3200 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=214, last 2 years)
1795 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
11301 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (10620 - 12383, n=10)
11182 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
11004 Points -3%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10615 Points -6%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
10097 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10020 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=214, last 2 years)
5255 Points -53%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
22179 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (18445 - 28557, n=8)
20978 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20764 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
18445 Points -17%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
17480 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=186, last 2 years)
14942 Points -33%
CrossMark - Overall
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
2722 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2598 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2354 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1698 - 2722, n=7)
2310 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2722, n=122, last 2 years)
1175 Points -57%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
15734 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
14678 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (7945 - 16690, n=9)
13739 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13325 Points -15%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10620 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 16690, n=150, last 2 years)
7853 Points -50%
System
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
20996 Points +4%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
20150 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (9356 - 21153, n=9)
18668 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17171 Points -15%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
15639 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 21153, n=150, last 2 years)
11617 Points -42%
Memory
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
22887 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
18501 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17355 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6789 - 24052, n=9)
17053 Points -25%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
13155 Points -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 24052, n=150, last 2 years)
8952 Points -61%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (41267 - 61797, n=9)
52025 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
51530 Points 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
51366 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45562 Points -11%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
26660 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=150, last 2 years)
26630 Points -48%
Web
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
2587 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2322 Points -10%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
2319 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2319 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1561 - 2587, n=9)
2239 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2587, n=150, last 2 years)
1720 Points -34%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
5143 Points +510%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
843 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=64, last 2 years)
777 Points -8%
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
733 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (511 - 843, n=9)
639 Points -24%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
559 Points -34%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
35890 Points +4157%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=64, last 2 years)
3234 Points +284%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
843 Points
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
718 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (486 - 843, n=9)
617 Points -27%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
561 Points -33%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
49889 Points +2412%
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=64, last 2 years)
4710 Points +137%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
1986 Points
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
1631 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (974 - 1986, n=9)
1350 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1285 Points -35%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
22780 Points
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
21660 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
19229 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1098 - 22780, n=6)
15134 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10621 Points -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 22780, n=77, last 2 years)
5293 Points -77%

死机 Adreno 840提供纯粹的图形处理能力，支持光线追踪技术，并在测试中显示出超强的性能。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
8102 Points
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7629 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6959 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6907 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
5928 Points -27%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
8072 Points
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7582 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7021 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6845 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
6001 Points -26%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
30621 Points +2%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
30166 Points
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
26944 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26614 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
26286 Points -13%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
14869 Points +5%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
14225 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
13036 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12395 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
11442 Points -20%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
15420 Points +8%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
14331 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12711 Points -11%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
12242 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
12194 Points -15%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3208 Points +4%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3081 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2704 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
2630 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2397 Points -22%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3253 Points +5%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3101 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2736 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
2698 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2651 Points -15%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
937 fps +2%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
917 fps
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
754 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps -22%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
579 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
531 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps -11%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
441 fps -17%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
415 fps -22%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
341 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
399 fps
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
346 fps -13%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
343 fps -14%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
286 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
284 fps -29%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
239 fps
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
210 fps -12%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
198 fps -17%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
193 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
161 fps -33%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps -17%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
127 fps
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps -6%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
114 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
87 fps -31%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
367 fps +2%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
361 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
296 fps -18%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
253 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
237 fps -34%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
62 fps +7%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
58 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps -10%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50 fps -14%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
37 fps -36%
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)
479.804 Points
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)
469.169 Points -2%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
362.318 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 - 480, n=5)
265 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=52, last 2 years)
224 Points -53%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)
302 Points +40%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
255 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
236 Points +9%
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)
216 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (102 - 278, n=7)
171.3 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=144, last 2 years)
147.2 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)
124 Points -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)
126661 Points
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)
119218 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
99202 Points -22%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
96438 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (50987 - 126661, n=7)
84253 Points -33%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)
58421 Points -54%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=195, last 2 years)
49588 Points -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=155, last 2 years)
1141 ms * -301%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)
522.8 ms * -84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (284 - 635, n=8)
421 ms * -48%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
376.8 ms * -32%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)
373.8 ms * -31%
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)
284.4 ms *
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)
270.4 ms * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Honor Magic8 ProSamsung Galaxy S25 UltraVivo X300 ProXiaomi Poco F8 UltraHonor Magic7 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-25%
-32%
6%
-21%
-15%
-43%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
3942.69
3823.28
-3%
2041.82
-48%
4064.33
3%
3910.81
-1%
3708 ?(1954 - 4110, n=27)
-6%
2248 ?(270 - 4370, n=198, last 2 years)
-43%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
3732.81
3361.24
-10%
1981.85
-47%
3987.65
7%
3683.81
-1%
3234 ?(1240 - 4035, n=27)
-13%
1887 ?(103.2 - 4051, n=198, last 2 years)
-49%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
488.67
287.85
-41%
320.25
-34%
575.86
18%
282.34
-42%
393 ?(279 - 576, n=27)
-20%
299 ?(47.6 - 576, n=198, last 2 years)
-39%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
587.11
331.61
-44%
593.74
1%
551.82
-6%
357.04
-39%
456 ?(48.2 - 689, n=27)
-22%
346 ?(9.4 - 987, n=198, last 2 years)
-41%

排放 - 负载下的性能限制

温度

Magic8 Pro 的表面温度始终保持安全，即使在持续负载的情况下，某些区域的温度甚至未达到 44 °C。

在压力测试中，SoC 的冷却系统难以承受产生的热量，导致性能下降约 50%。

Max. Load
 42.1 °C42.6 °C42.1 °C 
 40.2 °C42.4 °C42 °C 
 38.2 °C41.8 °C39.3 °C 
Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 41.2 °C
39.7 °C41 °C43.2 °C
38.5 °C40.2 °C40.8 °C
38.4 °C39.8 °C39.4 °C
Maximum: 43.2 °C
Average: 40.1 °C
Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
99.7 % +99%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.6 % +15%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.9 % +10%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
52.3 % +5%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
73.5 % +45%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.3 % +3%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50.7 %
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50.3 % -1%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
76.8 % +49%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
51.6 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 % -4%
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
49.5 % -4%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
% -100%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.4 % +41%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe
65.8 % +36%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.6 % +5%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
48.4 %
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
47 % -3%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø29.9 (22-43.5)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø29.2 (26.9-36.7)
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø27.3 (21.9-43.5)
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø98.4 (78.1-156.3)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (59.8-60)
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø88.6 (69.3-132.4)
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø14.1 (10.3-21.3)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø15.4 (13.4-20.4)
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø14 (11-23.3)
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø30 (21.5-41.7)
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø33.4 (31-40.3)
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø29.1 (23.9-48.2)

发言人

Honor 智能手机的两个扬声器的主要目的是利用人工智能算法提供有深度的空间音效体验。在中等音量下，扬声器能很好地实现这一目标，从而产生迷人的音场。不过，在全音量时，高音有时会明显失真。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.838.92529.6323119.342.14025.3415033.341.86320.748.48023.849.610018.448.812515.25216011.956.62001557.125011.758.231511.762.440010.164.45009.871.163010.872.880011.376.7100011.379.5125012.382.9160011.778.4200011.382.225001282.7315012.283400012.885500013.182.4630013.380.3800013.376.71000013.476.51250013.368.11600012.962.7SPL24.493.1N0.598median 12.2median 76.7Delta1.39.736.941.135.428.527.523.228.430.629.839.423.227.519.53619.445.620.150.917.660.618.457.515.557.912.75811.461.612.965.311.765.511.369.312.274.213.174.915.176.113.179.81379.413.376.713.378.113.377.313.676.413.673.513.67713.771.91459.125.488.40.774.6median 13.3median 73.51.18hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor Magic8 ProApple iPhone 17 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Magic8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 为欧洲设计更小的电池

耗电量

Magic8 Pro 的功耗相对较低，再配上 6270 毫安时的电池，应该能保证出色的续航时间。遗憾的是，欧洲版的电池容量较小；中国版的电池容量为 7,200 毫安时，充电速度更快。

评测版本的有线充电功率高达 100 瓦，充满电需要 36 分钟（50%：14 分钟）。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.26 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.58 / 0.74 / 0.75 Watt
Load midlight 11.35 / 11.87 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor Magic8 Pro
6270 mAh		Apple iPhone 17 Pro
3988 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh		Vivo X300 Pro
5440 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
6500 mAh		Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-70%
-17%
-84%
-31%
-54%
-34%
-43%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.58
0.56
3%
0.55
5%
0.86
-48%
0.87
-50%
0.94
-62%
0.798 ?(0.58 - 1.2, n=8)
-38%
0.847 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=164, last 2 years)
-46%
Idle Average * (Watt)
0.74
1.78
-141%
0.77
-4%
1.8
-143%
1.29
-74%
1.5
-103%
1.283 ?(0.74 - 2.13, n=8)
-73%
1.446 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=164, last 2 years)
-95%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
0.75
1.89
-152%
0.91
-21%
1.86
-148%
1.33
-77%
1.57
-109%
1.52 ?(0.75 - 2.18, n=8)
-103%
1.63 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=164, last 2 years)
-117%
Load Average * (Watt)
11.35
12.36
-9%
13.81
-22%
10.63
6%
8.84
22%
11.03
3%
7.08 ?(4.2 - 11.4, n=7)
38%
6.95 ?(2.3 - 15.4, n=140, last 2 years)
39%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
11.87
17.69
-49%
16.69
-41%
21.99
-85%
9.15
23%
11.68
2%
11.2 ?(8.9 - 15.3, n=7)
6%
11.3 ?(3.53 - 22, n=140, last 2 years)
5%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.54 (0.614-11.8)
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.37 (0.963-9.17)
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.557 (0.4958-0.791)
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.9-1.319)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.8 (11.5-11.9)
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.08 (9.02-9.14)
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.557 (0.4958-0.791)
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.9-1.319)

电池运行时间

Honor Magic 8 Pro 在电池测试中取得了非常好的续航时间。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 143)
26h 52min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Honor Magic8 Pro
6270 mAh
26.9 h
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
3988 mAh
24.2 h
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
22.2 h
Vivo X300 Pro
5440 mAh
17.9 h
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
6500 mAh
21.9 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

评论 Honor Magic8 Pro
评论 Honor Magic8 Pro

Honor Magic8 Pro 拥有更亮的 OLED 显示屏、强劲的性能和长时间的软件支持，是当之无愧的继任者，但在欧洲，你必须接受电池尺寸和存储选项方面的妥协。

Honor Magic8 Pro - 01/13/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
68 / 69 → 98%
Weight
88%
Battery
95%
Display
93%
Games Performance
40 / 55 → 72%
Application Performance
89 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
51%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
84 / 90 → 93%
Camera
87%
Average
71%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
92.4%
Repairability
20%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 52.1%

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
89.3%
Honor Magic8 Pro
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $8.99
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ...
2. $11.88
[5 Pack] Screen Protector fo...
3. $6.87
GUYAHANYER 3-Pack Screen Pro...
List Price: 1300€		219 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.71"
2808x1256
458 PPI
OLED
2.
89.9%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro ⎘
Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD		Amazon:
1. $48.99
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Silicone...
2. $49.00
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Silicone...
3. $9.89
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
List Price: 1549€		206 gApple 512GB NVMe6.30"
2622x1206
458 PPI
OLED
3.
89.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. 
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, 25...
2. $1,154.50
Samsung Galaxy ​S25 Ultra ...
3. $1,299.99
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-...
List Price: 1449€		218 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"
3120x1440
498 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4.
88.1%
Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘
Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $11.99
MAOUICI Tempered Glass for V...
2. $7.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ...
3. $9.91
MAOUICI Tempered Glass for V...
List Price: 1399€		226 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.78"
2800x1260
453 PPI
AMOLED
5.
88.2%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $10.79
Ibywind for Xiaomi Poco F8 U...
2. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 U...
3. $12.99
Suttkue for POCO F8 Ultra Sc...
List Price: 900€		220 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.90"
2608x1200
416 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 配备 XXL 电池的旗舰机型 -Honor Magic8 Pro 智能手机评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2026-01-17 (Update: 2026-01-17)