Apple iPhone 18 Pro 评测 - 小巧强悍，但仍有一个尚未解决的短板

Name: Apple iPhone 18 Pro
Brand: Apple

雄心驱动进化。

更出色的相机画质、更强的性能、更 Pro？2026 年全新小尺寸 iPhone 带来了一些令人兴奋的创新。但规格参数只能说明一半。在我们的深度评测中，我们测试了可变光圈、更明亮的 OLED 显示屏以及 Apple A20 Pro 的性能。阅读我们的评测，看看 Apple 的旗舰机型能否实现其远大抱负。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/10/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Apple 5G Touchscreen Smartphone

Apple iPhone 18 Pro 评测结论

在我们的评测中，Apple iPhone 18 Pro 展现出一款雄心勃勃的旗舰智能手机的实力，将极致性能融入紧凑的机身之中。不过，Apple 遭遇了物理极限，新散热系统的效率不及去年的版本。全新的 Apple A20 Pro 性能强劲，足以应对未来数年的需求，尤其是未来的 AI 应用。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

iPhone 18 Pro 的显示屏尚未达到最顶尖水平。尤其是低频 PWM 调光，需要在 iPhone 19 Pro 上加以改进。我们也认为，由于传感器尺寸相对较小，其相机配置无法与 Vivo X300 Ultra 或 Oppo Find X9 Ultra 等最顶尖的 Android 手机相媲美。

Pros

+ 高端机身

+ 强劲性能

+ 扬声器在紧凑型产品中表现出色

+ 电池续航良好

+ 明亮的 OLED 面板 ...

Cons

- ... PWM 调光频率较低

- 充电速度未达顶级水平

- 蓝牙编解码器较少

- 无官方更新保证

- 摄像头存在些许不足

- 保修期短

Apple iPhone 18 Pro 的价格和上市情况

配备 256 GB 存储空间的 Apple iPhone 18 Pro 的建议零售价为 1,199 美元，可直接从制造商或包括 amazon.com 在内的在线零售商处购买。

配备 2 TB 存储空间的顶配版本售价高达 2,399 美元，贵得离谱。

$1,019.00
Apple iPhone 17 Pro, US Version, 256GB, eSIM, Cosmic Orange- Unlocked (Renewed)
$1,048.00
Apple iPhone 17 Pro, US Version, 256GB, eSIM, Silver- Unlocked (Renewed Premium)
$1,429.00
iPhone 17 Pro Max 256GB Silver (Unlocked)

Bestpreis 1419.99 € x-kom

Apple iPhone 18 Pro 256GB schwarz

2. 1429 € afbshop
3. 1434.9 € FundK
4. 1439 € insachendruck

Apple iPhone 18 Pro 评测结论
Apple iPhone 18 Pro 规格
保护壳 - 现代外观的防水 Apple 智能手机
特点 - 小巧的 iPhone 18 Pro，配备最高 2 TB 存储空间
软件 - 配备更小灵动岛的小巧 Pro 机型
通信与 GNSS - 搭载全新调制解调器的 Apple iPhone 18 Pro
电话功能与通话质量 - 支持 eSIM 和双 SIM 卡的顶级智能手机
相机 - iPhone 18 Pro 配备可变光圈和光学图像防抖功能
配件和保修 - Apple iPhone 18 Pro 仅附 USB 线缆
输入设备与操作 - Apple 手机没有指纹传感器，而是采用 Face ID
显示屏 - Apple 的 OLED 面板表现出色
性能 - iPhone 18 Pro 搭载 A20 Pro 和 12 GB 内存
排放 - iPhone 18 Pro 配备全新散热技术，但在日常使用中影响甚微
续航时间 - 配备小容量电池的紧凑型旗舰智能手机
Notebookcheck 综合评分
可能的替代方案对比

Apple iPhone 18 Pro 规格

Apple iPhone 18 Pro (iPhone 18 Series)

Processor

Apple A20 Pro 6c, 2 x 4.9 GHz Apple M6 S-Core, 4 x 2.6 GHz Apple M6 E-Core

Graphics adapter

Apple A20 Pro 7-core GPU

Memory

12 GB

Display

6.30 inch 19.5:9, 2622 x 1206 pixel 458 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, Ceramic Shield 2, glossy: no, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB NVMe, 256 GB

, 232 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 5G: n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n25, n26, n28, n30, n66, n70, n75, n38, n40, n41, n48, n53, n77, n78, n79; 4G: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 66, 106, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53; 3G: 850, 900, 1.700/2.100, 1.900, 2.100 MHz; 2G: 850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 150 x 71.9

Battery

4056 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Apple iOS 27

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.5-4.0, OIS, 24 mm, 1/1.28") + 48 MPix (4x optical zoom, f/2.8, 1/2.55", tele, 100 mm) + 48 MPix (f/2.2, 1/2.55", ultrawide, 13 mm) + TOF 3D
Secondary Camera: 18 MPix (f/1.9, PDAF, 20 mm, 1080p@120fps)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, USB cable, iOS, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC | Dual-Band-GNSS: GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | dual eSIM | IP68 | Body-SAR: 1.49 W/kg, Head-SAR: 1.49 W/kg , fanless, waterproof

Weight

211 g

Price

1449 Euro

Links

Apple homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

保护壳 - 现代外观的防水 Apple 智能手机

iPhone 18 Pro 的外观与 iPhone 17 Pro 几乎完全相同，但 Apple 对设计做了细微调整。想让别人一眼看出自己正在使用这款全新旗舰智能手机的用户，需要在购买时选择专属的冰川色（浅蓝色）或勃艮第红（深红色）。

Apple 的 Pro 机型再次具备 IP68 级防尘防水能力。iPhone 18 Pro 重 211 克，对于一款紧凑型智能手机来说相对较重，但做工非常出色。机身也颇具高级感，握在手中有一种舒适的“圆润”感。

正面采用去年推出的第二代超瓷晶面板，而背面仅采用第一代超瓷晶面板。与前代一样，Apple 当前的 Pro 机型配备了操作按钮和相机按钮。

尺寸对比

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Google Pixel 10 Pro Xiaomi 17 Pro Apple iPhone 18 Pro Apple iPhone 17 Pro DIN A6 ❌

特点 - 小巧的 iPhone 18 Pro，配备最高 2 TB 存储空间

除了红外发射器之外，Apple 为其小巧的旗舰智能手机配备了目前可用的所有功能。卫星通信（在欧洲仅限于“紧急 SOS”，且并非永久免费）、UWB 和 NFC 芯片、MagSafe 或 Qi2 无线充电，以及高速 USB 3.2（Gen. 2）端口。

软件 - 配备更小灵动岛的小巧 Pro 机型

iPhone 18 Pro 搭载 iOS 27；你可以在这篇文章中了解所有新功能。这一代的挖孔略小一些，但灵动岛现在可以显示三个小组件。部分 AI 服务现在需要付费订阅（Apple One Premier）。

Apple 仍未就更新支持作出任何具体承诺。不过，根据其以往的记录，买家可以预期获得约五年的软件支持。

可持续发展

Apple 的 iPhone 18 Pro 采用外包装，看起来不含塑料。在可持续发展报告中，Apple 还提供了再生材料占比以及稀土和贵金属回收率的信息。iPhone 也提供自助维修计划。

通信与 GNSS - 搭载全新调制解调器的 Apple iPhone 18 Pro

iPhone 18 Pro 支持先进的 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 6.0。搭配我们的华硕参考路由器时，可实现高速且稳定的数据传输，不过与 Find X9 Ultra 或 Xiaomi 17 Ultra 相比，其数据传输速率仍有提升空间。

移动通信频段覆盖非常出色。iPhone 18 Pro 首次在欧洲采用 Apple 自研的蜂窝调制解调器，名为 Apple C2。因此，Apple 正逐步减少对供应商 Qualcomm 的依赖。Apple 还宣称提升了能效和速度。

Networking
Apple iPhone 18 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1790 (min: 1689) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1943 (min: 1897) MBit/s ∼82%
Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	928 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	916 (min: 903) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1571 MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1742 (min: 1566) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	946 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	927 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1844 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1619 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2017 (min: 1945) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2173 (min: 1784) MBit/s ∼92%
Xiaomi 17 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1076 (min: 975) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1264 (min: 1065) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1113 (min: 1045) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1292 (min: 1201) MBit/s ∼74%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	834 (min: 647) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	824 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1667 (min: 1563) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1216 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7	1411 (min: 1363) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7	1733 (min: 1590) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1040 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1289 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1507 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2100 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2368 (min: 396) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7	1746 (min: 1411) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7	1488 (min: 1354) MBit/s ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	663 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	693 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1258 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1413 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1643 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1792 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7	1616 (min: 343) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7	1409 (min: 341) MBit/s ∼81%

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1813 (911-1876) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1618 (1324-1681) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø930 (475-968) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (879-939) MBit/s

Apple iPhone 18 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 6GHz: Ø1790 (1689-1862) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 5 GHz: Ø2016 (1945-2080) MBit/s

Apple iPhone 18 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 6GHz: Ø1943 (1897-1987) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 5 GHz: Ø2178 (1784-2273) MBit/s

支持所有全球卫星网络的双频 GNSS 可用于定位。定位快速且准确。骑行时，iPhone 18 Pro 也能相当准确地记录我们的路线，不过仍能明显看出细微偏差。

电话功能与通话质量 - 支持 eSIM 和双 SIM 卡的顶级智能手机

在欧洲，iPhone 18 Pro 仍可使用一张 nanoSIM 和一张额外的 eSIM。也可以使用两张 eSIM 来实现双 SIM 卡功能。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。

通话音质令人印象深刻，低频背景噪声也能被有效滤除。

相机 - iPhone 18 Pro 配备可变光圈和光学图像防抖功能

在当前的 Pro 机型上，Apple 首次提供了配备可变光圈的主摄像头，其结构由六片塑料叶片和一个小型马达组成。最大光圈为 f/1.48，可手动分三档缩小至 f/4，从而让背景清晰或虚化。不过，这远称不上真正的颠覆性变化；这项相机功能在 Android 阵营中几乎已被完全弃用，是有原因的。

除了可变光圈，Apple 还提供了许多功能，例如 ProRes 和 ProRAW，以及用于未经编辑的原始照片的全新 Apple Reference Image 和功能全面的 Pro 模式。不过，4800 万像素主摄像头的照片质量有时仍有提升空间。iPhone 18 Pro 的照片在锐度和细节方面有所欠缺，尤其是场景纵深处。我们很喜欢它在弱光下拍摄的照片。

我们的 ColorChecker 分析显示，其色彩准确度良好，但 DeltaE 偏差比 iPhone 17 Pro 更大。

超广角和长焦镜头几乎没有变化。它们在日光下表现良好，但小尺寸传感器（1/2.55"）在暗光下显露出局限性。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low Light Ultra wide angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修 - Apple iPhone 18 Pro 仅附 USB 线缆

Apple 并没有为 iPhone 18 Pro 附赠太多配件。包装盒内仅有一根 USB 线缆（两端均为 Type-C 接口）和一个 SIM 卡取卡针。不过，Apple 在自家商店中提供种类丰富的配件，但都需要额外付费。

在许多国家，保修期仅为 12 个月。不过，可以选购 Apple Care+ 保险套餐。

输入设备与操作 - Apple 手机没有指纹传感器，而是采用 Face ID

iPhone 18 Pro 的触摸屏响应迅速且精准，熟悉的背部轻点输入功能也同样可用。Apple 的 Taptic Engine 提供出色的触觉反馈。

Face ID 可用于生物识别安全验证。3D 面部识别系统能够快速且非常可靠地识别用户。遗憾的是，Apple 没有同时配备指纹传感器，因为这两种解锁方式在日常使用中的便利程度各有不同。

显示屏 - Apple 的 OLED 面板表现出色

较小的 Pro 机型的 OLED 显示屏没有任何变化。iPhone 18 Pro 的屏幕尺寸为 6.3 英寸，支持 1 至 120 Hz 的可变刷新率。亮度与去年相比没有变化。我们的 APL18 测量结果约为 3,000 cd/m²，这也是 Apple 标称的峰值亮度。

因此，这块 OLED 显示屏明亮悦目，色彩也相当准确。不过，在减少反光方面，Apple 应该尽快借鉴 Samsung 的旗舰机型。

尤其是中国品牌的旗舰机型，其 PWM 调光频率最高可超过 4,320 Hz，对眼睛更友好，而 Apple 在 iPhone 18 Pro 上仍采用约 480 Hz 的低频范围。我们在最低亮度下测得的基础频率仅为 60 Hz。不过，Display Pulse Smoothing 在此发挥了作用，使我们测得的调制深度低至 12%。


1298 cd/m²	1302 cd/m²	1264 cd/m²
1302 cd/m²	1314 cd/m²	1288 cd/m²
1277 cd/m²	1301 cd/m²	1255 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1314 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1289 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1314 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.07 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.223
CCT: 7016 K

	Apple iPhone 18 Pro OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"	Google Pixel 10 Pro OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"	Xiaomi 17 Pro LTPO AMOLED, 2656x1220, 6.3"	Apple iPhone 17 Pro OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"
Display		7%	-6%		1%
APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	3012	3199 6%	2713 -10%		3044 1%
HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	2998	3207 7%	2975 -1%		2997 0%
Response Times		-83%	-74%	-29%	-70%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	0.9 ?(0.5, 0.4)	1.31 ?(0.513, 0.8015) -46%	0.84 ?(0.451, 0.3885) 7%	0.7 ?(0.3, 0.4) 22%	1.13 ?(0.53, 0.602) -26%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2)	1.04 ?(0.505, 0.5395) -160%	1.25 ?(0.5915, 0.6615) -213%	0.6 ?(0.3, 0.3) -50%	1.04 ?(0.476, 0.56) -160%
PWM Frequency (Hz)	60	240	240	120	240
PWM Amplitude * (%)	12	17.24 -44%	13.99 -17%	19 -58%	14.89 -24%
Screen		58%	12%	23%	14%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1314	2161 64%	1339 2%	1071 -18%	1059 -19%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1289	2198 71%	1381 7%	1048 -19%	1060 -18%
Brightness Distribution (%)	96	94 -2%	94 -2%	96 0%	99 3%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.07	0.7 66%	2.5 -21%	0.98 53%	1.3 37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.68	1.8 68%	3.8 33%	2.58 55%	3.6 37%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.7	0.8 78%	1.7 54%	1.2 68%	2.1 43%
Gamma	2.223 ^99%	2.19 ^100%	2.05 ^107%	2.221 ^99%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	7016 ^93%	6646 ^98%	6498 ^100%	6703 ^97%	6542 ^99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-6% / 10%	-23% / -15%	-3% / 6%	-18% / -11%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

60 Hz
Amplitude: 12 %

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7605 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下进行的一系列测量（尽管最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来是平坦的，但这是由缩放比例造成的。最低亮度下振幅的放大图可在信息框中查看。）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.2 ms rise
0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.5 ms rise
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms).

性能 - iPhone 18 Pro 搭载 A20 Pro 和 12 GB 内存

iPhone 18 Pro 的核心是全新的 Apple A20 Pro，这是 Apple 首款 2 nm ARM 处理器。该芯片组配备两个全新的“Super”核心和四个能效核心，在 Geekbench 测试中力压 Android 竞争对手，尤其是在单核性能方面。其 NPU 单元针对 AI 应用的内存带宽提升了 50%，在基准测试中也超越了 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen5。

Geekbench 7.0 | Geekbench 6.7 | Antutu v11 | AImark | Geekbench AI

Geekbench 7.0
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 18 Pro Apple A20 Pro, A20 Pro 7-core GPU, 12288	4055 Points
Average Apple A20 Pro (n=1)	4055 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	3175 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	3142 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (514 - 4055, n=40, last 2 years)	1585 Points -61%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 18 Pro Apple A20 Pro, A20 Pro 7-core GPU, 12288	11622 Points
Average Apple A20 Pro (n=1)	11622 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	10398 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	9003 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (1368 - 11622, n=40, last 2 years)	5504 Points -53%

Geekbench 6.7
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 18 Pro Apple A20 Pro, A20 Pro 7-core GPU, 12288	4733 Points
Average Apple A20 Pro (4725 - 4733, n=2)	4729 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	3803 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	3759 Points -21%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3587 Points -24%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	2308 Points -51%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 4733, n=188, last 2 years)	1886 Points -60%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 18 Pro Apple A20 Pro, A20 Pro 7-core GPU, 12288	12854 Points
Average Apple A20 Pro (12575 - 12854, n=2)	12715 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	11337 Points -12%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	10798 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	10097 Points -21%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	6314 Points -51%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 12854, n=188, last 2 years)	5729 Points -55%

Antutu v11 - Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	3882009 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 18 Pro Apple A20 Pro, A20 Pro 7-core GPU, 12288	3529081 Points
Average Apple A20 Pro (n=1)	3529081 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (519159 - 4450644, n=45, last 2 years)	2449165 Points -31%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	2413726 Points -32%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	37423 Points +12%
Apple iPhone 18 Pro Apple A20 Pro, A20 Pro 7-core GPU, 12288	33309 Points
Average Apple A20 Pro (n=1)	33309 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=67, last 2 years)	13892 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	2076 Points -94%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1477 Points -96%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 18 Pro Apple A20 Pro, A20 Pro 7-core GPU, 12288	7066 Points
Average Apple A20 Pro (n=1)	7066 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	5143 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	704 Points -90%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	644 Points -91%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 7066, n=134, last 2 years)	543 Points -92%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	478 Points -93%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	35890 Points +191%
Apple iPhone 18 Pro Apple A20 Pro, A20 Pro 7-core GPU, 12288	12354 Points
Average Apple A20 Pro (n=1)	12354 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 35139, n=134, last 2 years)	1450 Points -88%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	907 Points -93%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	679 Points -95%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	676 Points -95%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	49889 Points +450%
Apple iPhone 18 Pro Apple A20 Pro, A20 Pro 7-core GPU, 12288	9071 Points
Average Apple A20 Pro (n=1)	9071 Points 0%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	3792 Points -58%
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 48271, n=134, last 2 years)	2216 Points -76%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	1530 Points -83%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1498 Points -83%

A20 Pro 的图形芯片配备七个核心。其在 3D 基准测试中的表现堪称一流。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	10023 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8053 Points -20%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	6843 Points -32%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	5928 Points -41%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3232 Points -68%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	9096 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7735 Points -15%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	6897 Points -24%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	6001 Points -34%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3281 Points -64%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	39243 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	30624 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	26286 Points -33%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	25687 Points -35%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13193 Points -66%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	15787 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14321 Points -9%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	12656 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	11442 Points -28%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	15563 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14525 Points -7%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	12679 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	12194 Points -22%

3DMark / Solar Bay Extreme Score
Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	3265 Points
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	2131 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1196 Points -63%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash (1.0.2.1)	100 (9.59^min - 9.59^max) Points -97%

3DMark / Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	2109 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1124 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	4207 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3088 Points -27%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	2732 Points -35%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	2630 Points -37%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1013 Points -76%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	4198 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3084 Points -27%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash (1.0.6.1)	2707 (20^min - 20^max) Points -36%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	2698 Points -36%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1014 Points -76%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 5

Jetstream 2
2.0 Total
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	422.954 Points
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)	329.095 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	193.311 Points
Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=117, last 2 years)	157.1 Points
2.2 Total
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)	469.169 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	429.726 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 18 Pro ((Safari Mobile 27)	423.353 Points
Average Apple A20 Pro (n=1)	423 Points 0%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	274.298 Points -35%
Xiaomi 17 Pro (Chrome 141)	221.233 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=105, last 2 years)	206 Points -51%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 18 Pro ((Safari Mobile 27)	56.5 runs/min
Average Apple A20 Pro (n=1)	56.5 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	45.5 runs/min -19%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)	41.7 runs/min -26%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	20.6 runs/min -64%
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 56.5, n=82, last 2 years)	15.1 runs/min -73%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 18 Pro ((Safari Mobile 27)	160221 Points
Average Apple A20 Pro (n=1)	160221 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)	119218 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	105762 Points -34%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	84055 Points -48%
Xiaomi 17 Pro (Chrome 141)	61238 Points -62%
Average of class Smartphone (6015 - 160221, n=134, last 2 years)	51882 Points -68%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (216 - 2718, n=121, last 2 years)	847 ms * -292%
Xiaomi 17 Pro (Chrome 141)	511.76 ms * -137%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	472.5 ms * -119%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	283.6 ms * -31%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)	270.4 ms * -25%
Average Apple A20 Pro (n=1)	216 ms * -0%
Apple iPhone 18 Pro ((Safari Mobile 27)	215.9 ms *

WebXPRT 5 - Overall
Apple iPhone 18 Pro ((Safari Mobile 27)	139 Points
Average Apple A20 Pro (n=1)	139 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari 26.6.1)	97 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 139, n=27, last 2 years)	55 Points -60%

* ... smaller is better

排放 - iPhone 18 Pro 配备全新散热技术，但在日常使用中影响甚微

温度

Apple 声称，借助效率更高的均热板，新款 Pro 机型的被动散热能力有所提升。然而，我们的测量和基准测试结果却得出了不同的结论。iPhone 18 Pro 的温度略高，平均而言，其性能降频幅度也比前代稍大。不过，与搭载 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen5 的竞品相比，这些结果总体上仍然不错。

Max. Load

Idle


42.3 °C	42.9 °C	41.1 °C
42.9 °C	43 °C	42.9 °C
42 °C	42.5 °C	42 °C

Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 42.4 °C


40.6 °C	41.7 °C	40.2 °C
40.6 °C	41.2 °C	42.8 °C
40.9 °C	41.2 °C	41.5 °C

Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 41.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	99.9 %
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	99.7 % 0%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.2 % -19%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	73.6 % -26%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.4 % -49%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	76.8 % +8%
Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	71.3 %
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	65.8 % -8%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.2 % -24%
Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78.5 % +21%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	70.3 % +8%
Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	64.8 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	97.3 % +44%
Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	67.6 %
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	65.8 % -3%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.5 % -15%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø29.2 (26.9-36.7) %

Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60 (59.9-60) %

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (59.8-60) %

Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø43.7 (41.6-58.3) %

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø33.4 (31-40.3) %

Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.7 (13.9-21.5) %

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability: Ø12 (10.8-15.4) %

Apple iPhone 18 Pro A20 Pro 7-core GPU, A20 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø22.8 (21.2-31.4) %

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø15.4 (13.4-20.4) %

扬声器

对于一款紧凑型智能手机而言，iPhone 18 Pro 的扬声器系统表现非常出色。虽然立体声的层次感还有待增强，但音质依然是一流的。不过，蓝牙编解码器支持就没这么出色了。

有线音频输出可通过 USB 端口实现。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple iPhone 18 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

续航时间 - 配备小容量电池的紧凑型旗舰智能手机

能量摄入

一如既往，Apple 本身并未公布官方电池容量。虽然 AppStore 中的系统应用显示容量为 4,288 mAh，但报道指出，欧洲的 nanoSIM 版本仅配备 4,056 mAh 电池。与 Android 竞品相比，充电速度也相当保守。

iPhone 18 Pro 只有使用 Apple 的 Dynamic Power Adapter 时，才能以最高 40 瓦的功率充电。在使用 Xiaomi 移动电源进行的测试中，我们测得充电时间略超过 60 分钟。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.3 / 1.5 / 1.8 Watt
Load	9.8 / 17.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Apple iPhone 18 Pro 4056 mAh	Google Pixel 10 Pro 4870 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 17 Pro 6300 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 Pro 3988 mAh	Average Apple A20 Pro	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		2%	11%	30%	1%	0%	21%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.3	1.01 22%	0.56 57%	0.8 38%	0.56 57%	1.3 ?(n=1) -0%	0.901 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=137, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.5	1.65 -10%	1.18 21%	1.4 7%	1.78 -19%	1.5 ?(n=1) -0%	1.483 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=137, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.8	2.05 -14%	1.33 26%	1.8 -0%	1.89 -5%	1.8 ?(n=1) -0%	1.677 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=137, last 2 years) 7%
Load Average * (Watt)	9.8	7.25 26%	14.91 -52%	4.2 57%	12.36 -26%	9.8 ?(n=1) -0%	6.82 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=89, last 2 years) 30%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	17.2	19.78 -15%	16.58 4%	8.9 48%	17.69 -3%	17.2 ?(n=1) -0%	10.8 ?(4.75 - 22, n=89, last 2 years) 37%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 18 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.74 (0.06163-17.1) Watt

Apple iPhone 18 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.617 (1.542-1.757) Watt

功耗：3DMark Steel Nomad Unlimited (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 18 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.617 (1.542-1.757) Watt

Apple iPhone 18 Pro; 2560x1440 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited: Ø13 (9.69-15.2) Watt

电池续航时间

iPhone 18 Pro 的电池续航对于一款小巧的手机来说表现不错，但与上一代相比，20 小时的续航时间却出人意料地短。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (safarie 27)		19h 47min

	Apple iPhone 18 Pro 4056 mAh	Google Pixel 10 Pro 4870 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 17 Pro 6300 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 Pro 3988 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)	19.8	21.1 7%	17.9 -10%	29.7 50%	24.2 22%

Notebookcheck 综合评分

任何想要一款小巧旗舰智能手机的人，都能在 Apple iPhone 18 Pro 便于握持的机身中享受到顶级硬件。不过，用户最好不要对 OLED 频闪敏感。

Back to the verdict

Apple iPhone 18 Pro - 10/08/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

90%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 92%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

68 / 69 → 98%

Weight

88 / 50-100 → 76%

Battery

92%

Display

90%

Games Performance

47 / 55 → 85%

Application Performance

96 / 85 → 100%

AI Performance

91%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

81 / 90 → 90%

Camera

87%

Average

82%

90%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
86.3%

Materials
60%

Packaging
85%

Power Use
95.4%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
80%

Total Sustainability Score: 76.1%

可能的替代方案对比

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 89.5%	Apple iPhone 18 Pro Apple A20 Pro ⎘ Apple A20 Pro 7-core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe	List Price: 1449€	211 g	256 GB NVMe	6.30" 2622x1206 458 PPI OLED
2. 88.9%	Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5 ⎘ IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	List Price: 1199€	207 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.30" 2856x1280 497 PPI OLED
3. 89.8%	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	List Price: 1449€	214 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.90" 3120x1440 498 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4. 90.5%	Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $779.50 XIAOMI 17T PRO Ai 5G (Compat... 2. $779.50 XIAOMI 17T PRO Ai 5G (Compat... 3. $699.50 XIAOMI 17T PRO Ai 5G (Compat... List Price: 650€	192 g	1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.30" 2656x1220 464 PPI LTPO AMOLED
5. 89.9%	Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro ⎘ Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD	List Price: 1549€	206 g	Apple 512GB NVMe	6.30" 2622x1206 458 PPI OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

Apple iPhone 18 Pro 评测 - 小巧强悍，但仍有一个尚未解决的短板

雄心驱动进化。

Apple iPhone 18 Pro 评测结论

Pros

Cons

Apple iPhone 18 Pro 的价格和上市情况

Table of Contents

Apple iPhone 18 Pro 规格

保护壳 - 现代外观的防水 Apple 智能手机

尺寸对比

特点 - 小巧的 iPhone 18 Pro，配备最高 2 TB 存储空间

软件 - 配备更小灵动岛的小巧 Pro 机型

可持续发展

通信与 GNSS - 搭载全新调制解调器的 Apple iPhone 18 Pro

电话功能与通话质量 - 支持 eSIM 和双 SIM 卡的顶级智能手机

相机 - iPhone 18 Pro 配备可变光圈和光学图像防抖功能

配件和保修 - Apple iPhone 18 Pro 仅附 USB 线缆

输入设备与操作 - Apple 手机没有指纹传感器，而是采用 Face ID

显示屏 - Apple 的 OLED 面板表现出色

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - iPhone 18 Pro 搭载 A20 Pro 和 12 GB 内存

排放 - iPhone 18 Pro 配备全新散热技术，但在日常使用中影响甚微

温度

3DMark 压力测试

扬声器

Apple iPhone 18 Pro audio analysis

Apple iPhone 17 Pro audio analysis

续航时间 - 配备小容量电池的紧凑型旗舰智能手机

能量摄入

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：3DMark Steel Nomad Unlimited (150 cd/m²)

电池续航时间

Notebookcheck 综合评分

可能的替代方案对比

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles