Exynos和更大的电池容量使其成为明星产品--三星Galaxy S26 评测

Name: Samsung Galaxy S26
Brand: Samsung

银河精华

Galaxy S26 仍是今年三星高端产品中最实惠、最小巧的一款。虽然它提供了一个几乎没有任何不足之处的全面包装，但在某些方面确实显得有些过时。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 04/30/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Galaxy S Samsung Smartphone Touchscreen

结论 - 三星Galaxy S26

Galaxy S26 是三星的紧凑型旗舰产品，搭载了新的 Exynos 2600 处理器，配备了更大的 6.3 英寸显示屏，电池容量增至 4300 毫安时。它的做工和亮度依然非常出色，提供了强大的日常性能、良好的 Wi-Fi 7 和 7 年更新，但在充电速度、负载下的发热量和显著的摄像头改进方面存在不足。总的来说，它更像是一次精心的微调，而不是一次重大的飞跃。

Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

仔细观察，这一点在芯片和电池续航时间方面尤为明显。Exynos 2600 可确保 S26 在日常使用中保持快速响应。不过，在持续负载的情况下，性能会明显下降，而且尽管电池容量更大，但电池续航时间仍然只是足够而非出色。S26 的优势之一是显示屏非常明亮、均匀且色彩准确。尽管如此，PWM 特性仍可能成为对此类问题敏感的用户的一个批评点。相机与前代产品相比变化不大，这意味着 S26 能提供出色的照片和视频，但除此之外别无其他。

Pros

+ 结构紧凑，质量上乘

+ 明亮的显示屏

+ 支持长期更新

+ 通过 IP68 认证

Cons

- PWM 调光

- 无 UWB，只有 BT 5.4

- 蓝牙编解码器数量少

- 充电速度慢

价格和供应情况

Galaxy S26 有各种颜色和存储容量可供选择，可直接在三星网上商店购买。不过，从亚马逊等在线零售商处购买通常会更便宜。

结论 - 三星Galaxy S26
规格 - 三星Galaxy S26
案例 -Galaxy S26 有所收获
功能 - 人工蓝牙降级
软件 -Galaxy S26 的 7 年更新
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备快速 Wi-Fi 功能的小巧智能手机 7
电话功能和语音质量
照相机 - 照相机
配件和保修 -Galaxy S26 可选配 Care+ 配件。
输入设备和操作 - 快速超声波指纹识别
Galaxy S26 的显示屏经过精心调整
性能 - Exynos 2600 取代 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
游戏 -Galaxy S26 可进行 120fps 游戏
排放 - S26 在持续负载情况下性能明显下降
电池续航时间 - 三星手机内置 4,300 毫安时电池
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可能的替代品比较

在高通公司的 Galaxy S25之后，三星又在 S25 中搭载了 Exynos 2600Galaxy S26 和 Galaxy S26+ - 这两款手机均采用 2 纳米工艺制造。不过，这并不是三星最小旗舰智能手机的唯一新功能，电池和通信模块也进行了升级。

规格 - 三星Galaxy S26

Samsung Galaxy S26 (Galaxy S26 Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 2600 10c/10t, 1 x 3.8 GHz ARM C1-Ultra, 3 x 3.3 GHz ARM C1-Pro, 6 x 2.8 GHz ARM C1-Pro

Graphics adapter

Samsung Xclipse 960

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.30 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Dynamic AMOLED 2XDynamic AMOLED 2X, 8 Bit color depth, LTPO, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 216.8 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Proximity, Magnetometer, Gyroscope, Barometer, OTG, DeX

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.2 x 149.6 x 71.7

Battery

16.77 Wh, 4300 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3.9 V; Battery Cycles: 1200

Charging

wireless charging

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung GN3, f/1.8, 23 mm, OIS) + 10 MPix (3x Tele, Samsung 3K1, f/2.4, 69 mm, OIS) + 12 MPix (Ultra wide, f/2.2, 13 mm); Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (Samsung 3LU, f/2.2, 23mm, AF)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, SIM-Tool, USB-Cabel, One UI 8.5, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | Dual-eSIM | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 386.57 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: NTFS (only reading), FAT32, exFAT | Body-SAR: 1.103 W/kg, Head-SAR: 1.214 W/kg | max. charging speed: 25 W (wired) / 15 W (wireless), fanless, waterproof

Released

02/25/2026

Weight

167 g

Price

999 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

案例 -Galaxy S26 有所收获

三星Galaxy S26 的厚度与前代产品相同，但稍宽稍长。三星公司再次规定其厚度为 7.2 毫米--我们测量的厚度为 7.3 毫米。加上摄像头后，厚度增加到了 10.35 毫米，这意味着三星智能手机放在桌子上会明显晃动。

S26 的制造质量非常出色，正面和背面的哑光铠甲铝边框与大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 之间的缝隙紧密而均匀。即使在扭曲的情况下，S26 也能保持完全静音。除此之外，它还通过了 IP68 认证，具备防尘和防水功能。

这款智能手机有钴紫、黑、天蓝和白四种颜色可供选择。粉金色和银影色在三星在线商店独家发售。

尺寸比较

功能 - 人工蓝牙降级

三星Galaxy S26 的短距离无线功能相当弱，因为它没有 UWB，只使用较老的蓝牙 5.4。尽管如此，其 SoC 与 S26+,它支持蓝牙 6.0。

这款智能手机的 USB 3.2（Gen.1）接口速度很快，还支持有线视频输出。在使用三星便携式固态硬盘 T7、它的数据吞吐量高达 380 MB/s。

软件 -Galaxy S26 的 7 年更新

三星Galaxy S26 预装了谷歌Android 16 和三星 One UI 8.5 界面，制造商承诺 7 年更新，具体到 2033 年 2 月 28 日。

与往年一样，预装了 Spotify、Netflix、Facebook 和微软等第三方应用程序，但可以完全删除。Perplexity 是新增加的功能，Galaxy AI 也包括在内，这次增强了 "Now Nudge "等新功能。一个积极的功能是可以选择在设备上专门执行本地 AI 计算。不过，这可能会导致速度和功能下降。

可持续性

除了长期更新保证外，三星还为其智能手机提供维修计划。用户会收到详细的说明，并可直接从制造商处获得合适的更换部件。不过，EPREL 数据库该设备的可修复性仅被评为 C 级。

另一方面，三星在可持续发展方面的透明度也很高：有关 CO₂e 排放量和可回收材料使用情况的信息比较全面，可在 Galaxy S26 的相应环境报告中查看。.

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备快速 Wi-Fi 功能的小巧智能手机 7

不出所料，Galaxy S26 支持 Wi-Fi 7，包括所有三个频段。这确保了与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配对时的高速稳定数据传输。

在移动连接方面，三星智能手机的配置也非常出色。它支持当前的所有标准，包括 5G Sub6。频率覆盖范围很广，但并不全面，但这应该意味着在大多数国家都能保证可靠的服务。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy S26 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	900 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	844 (min: 789) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1334 (min: 695) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1245 (min: 1159) MBit/s ∼69%
Xiaomi 17
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1086 (min: 1009) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1262 (min: 1051) MBit/s ∼70%
Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	928 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	916 (min: 903) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1571 MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1742 (min: 1566) MBit/s ∼97%
Vivo X300 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1843 (min: 1759) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1802 (min: 1718) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 17 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	777 (min: 620) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1592 (min: 1420) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1020 (min: 745) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1658 (min: 1579) MBit/s ∼92%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1053 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1257 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1468 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	699 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	744 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1279 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼78%

Samsung Galaxy S26 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1311 (695-1394)

Xiaomi 17 ; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1086 (1009-1197)

Samsung Galaxy S26 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1244 (1159-1257)

Xiaomi 17 ; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1262 (1051-1324)

Samsung Galaxy S26 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø885 (446-952)

Samsung Galaxy S26 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø841 (789-858)

即使在室内，Galaxy S26 也能实现快速、精确的卫星定位，并支持所有全球网络，至少是双频网络。

在一次骑车过程中，我们将三星智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较，结果证明其精确度与超级型号.在湖边，虽然 S26 的准确度略低于智能手表，但它在建筑物之间的接收特性更好。

电话功能和语音质量

三星Galaxy S26 支持所有现代标准，包括 VoIP 5G 和 Wi-Fi 通话。它可以容纳两张 nano-SIM 卡或两张 eSIM 卡，也可以混合使用。

Galaxy S26 的通话质量非常好，有效的降噪功能确保用户即使在嘈杂的环境中也能清晰通话。免提电话的通话质量可以用 "扎实 "来形容，但会有轻微的回声，使声音听起来有些闷。

除了实时 AI 电话翻译外，现在还增加了转录功能。

照相机 - 照相机

三星Galaxy S26 的摄像头设置与 Galaxy S25.较新的图像信号处理器（ISP）效果略好，但差别不大。

前置摄像头仍然具有自动对焦功能和良好的色彩准确性，在日光下也能提供令人满意的效果。最多只能以 60fps 的超高清速度录制视频。

后置摄像头设置包括一个 5000 万像素主传感器、一个光学变焦和一个超广角传感器，但缺乏微距功能。镜头眩光可能会出现在图像中，这取决于阳光照射的位置，而且要么没有防眩光涂层，要么防眩光涂层效果不佳。尽管如此，它还是能拍摄出色彩还原平衡的漂亮照片，不过细节还可以做得更好。变焦功能的效果也不错，但在数码领域还是要妥协。我们希望超广角镜头能增加动态范围和景深。

视频可以 8K（最高 30fps）或 4K（最高 60fps）格式录制。120fps 仅适用于全高清。新采用的 APV 编解码器用于 S26 Ultra不能用于 S26。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Ultra-wide angle 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在可控的照明条件下，Galaxy S26 能够显示清晰的图像，尽管中心部分的锐化稍有过度。相反，即使在边缘，细节也保存得很好。

色彩还原非常准确，没有明显的色彩偏差。

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S26: 3.81 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 7.69 ∆E

配件和保修 -Galaxy S26 可选配 Care+ 配件。

三星Galaxy S26 只配备了一条 USB-C 连接线和一个 SIM 卡工具。手机壳、电源适配器和其他配件可单独向三星公司购买，也可从第三方零售商处购买。

德国的保修期为 24 个月，可通过 Samsung Care+ 延长保修期。该保险套餐可购买两年，统一费用约为 160 美元或 210 美元（评论时的汇率），或每月约 8 美元或 9 美元，具体取决于是否包含防盗保险。

输入设备和操作 - 快速超声波指纹识别

三星Galaxy S26 的电容式触摸屏无需预装屏幕保护膜，有助于提供流畅的轻扫手势。输入注册快速而精确。显示屏上集成了超声波指纹传感器，可以快速、可靠地识别注册的指纹。此外，还可通过前置摄像头进行安全性较低的面部识别。

电源键实际上更像是一个功能键，不仅可以关闭和打开智能手机，还可以直接启动配置的助手或特定应用程序。此外，还包括单手模式。

线性振动电机的振动非常微妙和精确，但其强度可以在设置中进行调整。不过，如果设置为最强，可能会感觉有些乏味。

Galaxy S26 的显示屏经过精心调整

Galaxy S26 的显示屏略有增大，达到了 6.3 英寸（16 厘米），这主要是由于其尺寸稍大，这使得三星手机的屏占比达到了 91%，令人印象深刻。尽管如此，我们还是失望地发现它不支持杜比视界（Dolby Vision）。

S26 的亮度与 S25的亮度相当，面板的照明非常均匀。纯白显示屏的亮度约为 1,338 cd/m²，较小的白色区域甚至达到了 2,645 cd/m²。三星再次使用脉宽调制来控制亮度，频率相对较低，为 240 或 480 赫兹。这可能会让对此类问题敏感的用户感到不适。


1356 cd/m²	1342 cd/m²	1325 cd/m²
1349 cd/m²	1341 cd/m²	1318 cd/m²
1361 cd/m²	1338 cd/m²	1305 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1361 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1337.2 cd/m² Minimum: 0.96 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1341 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.06
CCT: 6497 K

	Samsung Galaxy S26 Dynamic AMOLED 2XDynamic AMOLED 2X, 8 Bit color depth, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Xiaomi 17 LTPO AMOLED , 2656x1220, 6.3"	Google Pixel 10 Pro OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"	Vivo X300 AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"	Samsung Galaxy S25 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.2"	Apple iPhone 17 OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"
Screen		-5%	51%	16%	-11%	9%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1341	1030 -23%	2161 61%	1537 15%	1301 -3%	1138 -15%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1337	1021 -24%	2198 64%	1523 14%	1311 -2%	1127 -16%
Brightness Distribution (%)	96	98 2%	94 -2%	96 0%	98 2%	96 0%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.4	1.44 40%	0.7 71%	1.4 42%	3.1 -29%	1.07 55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4	3.68 8%	1.8 55%	2.6 35%	4.4 -10%	2.99 25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.9	2.5 -32%	0.8 58%	2.1 -11%	2.3 -21%	1.8 5%
Gamma	2.06 ^107%	2.274 ^97%	2.19 ^100%	2.28 ^96%	2.01 ^109%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6497 ^100%	6868 ^95%	6646 ^98%	6754 ^96%	6454 ^101%	6516 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3199 cd/m² +21%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2645 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2594 cd/m² -2%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2386 cd/m² -10%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4072 cd/m² +49%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3207 cd/m² +17%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2766 cd/m² +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2730 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz
Amplitude: 13.6 %
Secondary Frequency: 480 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7885 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

与上一代产品相比，Galaxy S26 显示屏的色彩还原能力略有提高，只要在设置中选择 "自然 "显示模式，就能达到很好的水平。否则，显示屏会明显变冷。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6345 ms rise
1.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.6865 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.3275 ms rise
0.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.296 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms).

在室外，三星Galaxy S26 的表现令人印象深刻，只要让环境光线传感器自动工作，即使在阳光直射下也能保持清晰可读。手动调节亮度只能达到 422 cd/m²，而通过 "额外亮度 "选项可将亮度提高到 709 cd/m²。

S26 的视角稳定性非常出色。在广视角下，显示屏只会变得更冷，亮度也会略有下降。

性能 - Exynos 2600 取代 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Galaxy S26 采用了三星自产的 SoC，即 Exynos 2600并配备了 12 GB 内存。该处理器的单核性能略低于骁龙 8 精英 5 代中的 S26 Ultra.但在多核测试中，两者的差距微乎其微。

在人工智能和系统性能方面，Exynos 也取得了不错的成绩，这意味着在日常使用中不会出现明显的速度差异。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	3732 Points +22%
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	3662 Points +20%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	3397 Points +11%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (3060 - 3209, n=2)	3135 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3087 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	3060 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	2308 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=191, last 2 years)	1829 Points -40%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	10842 Points +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (10388 - 11034, n=2)	10711 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	10388 Points
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	9998 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	9776 Points -6%
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	9456 Points -9%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	6314 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=191, last 2 years)	5432 Points -48%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	20623 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	19914 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (19076 - 19914, n=2)	19495 Points -2%
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	19432 Points -2%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	15738 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=155, last 2 years)	15194 Points -24%

Antutu v11 - Score
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	3540306 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	3296169 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (3190793 - 3296169, n=2)	3243481 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (584158 - 4273120, n=28, last 2 years)	2431334 Points -26%

CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2356 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	2257 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (2098 - 2257, n=2)	2178 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=106, last 2 years)	1211 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	13984 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	12515 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (11422 - 12515, n=2)	11969 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	11876 Points -5%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	11566 Points -8%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	8446 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=127, last 2 years)	7842 Points -37%
System
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	19207 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17132 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	14913 Points
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	14659 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (12733 - 14913, n=2)	13823 Points -7%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	12881 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=127, last 2 years)	11485 Points -23%
Memory
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	16964 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	16455 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (13372 - 16455, n=2)	14914 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	14759 Points -10%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	11589 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=127, last 2 years)	8965 Points -46%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	7257 Points -56%
Graphics
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	52356 Points +24%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	46112 Points +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (42333 - 42732, n=2)	42533 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	42333 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	33965 Points -20%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	30035 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=127, last 2 years)	27148 Points -36%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	2361 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (2321 - 2361, n=2)	2341 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2275 Points -4%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	2245 Points -5%
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2234 Points -5%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1813 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=127, last 2 years)	1729 Points -27%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	23076 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	22393 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (22076 - 22393, n=2)	22235 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	21837 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=114, last 2 years)	20390 Points -9%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	17652 Points -21%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	35717 Points +1618%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=92, last 2 years)	17599 Points +747%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	2079 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (1998 - 2079, n=2)	2039 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1893 Points -9%
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	1789 Points -14%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1477 Points -29%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	4677 Points +521%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (753 - 756, n=2)	755 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	753 Points
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=94, last 2 years)	709 Points -6%
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	698 Points -7%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	612 Points -19%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	478 Points -37%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	35502 Points +4577%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=94, last 2 years)	2864 Points +277%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	907 Points +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (759 - 767, n=2)	763 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	759 Points
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	646 Points -15%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	621 Points -18%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	48896 Points +2913%
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=94, last 2 years)	4212 Points +160%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	3792 Points +134%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	1623 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (1621 - 1623, n=2)	1622 Points 0%
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	1409 Points -13%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	1409 Points -13%

AI Benchmark - Score V5
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	590 Points +173%
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=32, last 2 years)	586 Points +171%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	216 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (n=1)	216 Points 0%

图形计算由 Xclipse 960 GPU图形处理单元处理。与高通公司（Qualcomm）目前的顶级 SoC 相比，三星 SoC 在这一领域的差距有时是显而易见的。不过，三星 SoC 在 3DMark 中的表现甚至更好，在 GFXBench 中也经常名列前茅。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7101 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6932 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6788 Points
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6321 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	4904 Points -28%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3232 Points -52%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7122 Points
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7089 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6854 Points -4%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6311 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	5022 Points -29%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3281 Points -54%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	27327 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26692 Points
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	26476 Points -1%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	25598 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	21785 Points -18%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13193 Points -51%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13651 Points
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12146 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11765 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	10197 Points -25%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13952 Points
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12139 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11687 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	10389 Points -26%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3208 Points
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3134 Points -2%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2532 Points -21%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	2124 Points -34%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1013 Points -68%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3211 Points
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3145 Points -2%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2566 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	2197 Points -32%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1014 Points -68%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Points -100%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	946 fps +33%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	761 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	711 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	710 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	534.3 fps -25%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	406 fps -43%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	502 fps +15%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	456 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	435 fps
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	385 fps -11%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	338.5 fps -22%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	282 fps -35%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	383 fps +19%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	332 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	321 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	268 fps -17%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	230 fps -28%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	207 fps -36%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps -51%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	211 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	203 fps
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	193 fps -5%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	179 fps -12%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	164.8 fps -19%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 fps -60%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps -47%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	146 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	118 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	117 fps
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	108 fps -8%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	69.8 fps -40%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55 fps -53%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	94 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	361 fps +29%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	281 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	279 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	279 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	202.5 fps -27%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	127 fps -54%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps -10%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	49 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	29.6 fps -49%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25 fps -57%

使用Galaxy S26 上网冲浪是一种流畅而轻松的体验，这也反映在令人印象深刻的基准测试结果上。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	335.933 Points +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (273 - 281, n=2)	277 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Chrome 146)	273.066 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	193.311 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 423, n=126, last 2 years)	156.7 Points -43%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	599 runs/min +9%
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Chrome 146)	551 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (548 - 551, n=2)	550 runs/min 0%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	345 runs/min -37%
Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=95, last 2 years)	242 runs/min -56%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	39.6 runs/min +40%
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Chrome 146)	28.3 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (27.1 - 28.3, n=2)	27.7 runs/min -2%
Xiaomi 17 (Chrome 141)	20.9 runs/min -26%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	20.6 runs/min -27%
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=107, last 2 years)	15 runs/min -47%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	290 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	177 Points
Average of class Smartphone (56 - 306, n=115, last 2 years)	140.7 Points
Xiaomi 17 (Chrome 141)	102 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	110696 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Chrome 146)	92374 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (85043 - 92374, n=2)	88709 Points -4%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	84055 Points -9%
Xiaomi 17 (Chrome 141)	50987 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=158, last 2 years)	50801 Points -45%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=135, last 2 years)	1090 ms * -191%
Vivo X300 (Chrome 143)	663.7 ms * -77%
Xiaomi 17 (Chrome 141)	634.81 ms * -70%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	472.5 ms * -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (374 - 388, n=2)	381 ms * -2%
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Chrome 146)	374.4 ms *
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	263.1 ms * +30%

* ... smaller is better

虽然三星Galaxy S26 还没有使用最先进的 UFS 4.1 存储系统，但在基准测试中仍然取得了不错的成绩。只有小数据块的写入速度稍差。

	Samsung Galaxy S26	Xiaomi 17	Google Pixel 10 Pro	Vivo X300	Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		119%	8%	83%	50%	23%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3923.49	3943.44 1%	1492.74 -62%	2056.87 -48%	3631 ?(1493 - 4384, n=54) -7%	2235 ?(270 - 4370, n=175, last 2 years) -43%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	2718.09	3784.97 39%	1353.55 -50%	1997.76 -27%	2660 ?(555 - 3484, n=54) -2%	1911 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=175, last 2 years) -30%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	418.42	487.69 17%	264.44 -37%	332.61 -21%	383 ?(218 - 513, n=54) -8%	306 ?(47.6 - 614, n=175, last 2 years) -27%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	124.05	643.31 419%	347.84 180%	654.09 427%	391 ?(50.7 - 989, n=54) 215%	360 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=175, last 2 years) 190%

游戏 -Galaxy S26 可进行 120fps 游戏

Xclipse 960 Xclipse 960Xclipse 960 不仅在基准测试中表现出色，而且在游戏中也给人留下了深刻印象，我们可以使用GameBench 对其进行更详细的分析。.

简单的游戏也能以高达每秒 120 帧的速度流畅运行，而在要求更高的游戏中，降低细节设置也能达到这样的帧率。

Samsung Galaxy S26; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø59.5 (45-60)

Samsung Galaxy S26; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø59.7 (48-60)

Samsung Galaxy S26; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 4.3.0: Ø118.5 (100-120)

Samsung Galaxy S26; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø89.1 (78-91)

Samsung Galaxy S26; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø59.4 (49-60)

Samsung Galaxy S26; Subway Surfers: Ø119.4 (112-120)

排放 - S26 在持续负载情况下性能明显下降

温度

闲置时，三星Galaxy S26 的表面温度非常安全。但是，在持续负载的情况下（我们模拟运行了 Burnout 基准测试），这些温度明显升高，有时甚至超过 45°C。虽然温度很高，但并不值得担心。

就内部而言，发热对 Exynos 处理器的影响更大，它在 3DMark 压力测试中的性能下降了约 50%。不过，性能仍然很高，但小米 17给人留下了深刻印象。

Max. Load

Idle


45.1 °C	45.4 °C	42.9 °C
45.5 °C	44.6 °C	42 °C
43.7 °C	41.9 °C	39.1 °C

Maximum: 45.5 °C
Average: 43.4 °C


40.9 °C	42.1 °C	43.9 °C
39.6 °C	42.8 °C	43.8 °C
38.1 °C	43 °C	41.9 °C

Maximum: 43.9 °C
Average: 41.8 °C

Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	96.8 % +114%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.2 % +80%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	72.8 % +61%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	58.9 % +30%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52.7 % +17%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	45.2 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88.7 % +82%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	73.8 % +51%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	65.4 % +34%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	48.8 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	47.5 % -3%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	46.7 % -4%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	73 % +43%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	66.1 % +29%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.1 % +6%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.2 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	97.3 % +95%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	74.7 % +49%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	65.4 % +31%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60.9 % +22%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	50 %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø26.1 (21.2-43.3)

Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø30.7 (28-38)

Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø18 (17.1-19.3)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø25 (19.3-40.6)

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.8 (18.6-28.5)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø93.6 (72.4-160.2)

Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø105.2 (98.9-135.9)

Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø64.8 (61.7-76)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø92.8 (76.2-144.6)

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø59.6 (58.1-60)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø30.9 (24.2-47.2)

Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø31.9 (26.8-36.8)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.2 (20.2-37.3)

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.5 (21.5-32.6)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø15.2 (11.7-23.5)

Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø16 (13.9-18.6)

Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø7.49 (7.38-7.59)

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø12.1 (10.3-15.7)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 1.0.3.6: Ø9.85 (7.56-14.7)

Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 1.0.2.1: Ø7.61 (7.2-9.47)

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.57 (7.2-12.1)

发言人

Galaxy S26 的两个扬声器可提供不错的音效，但正如预期的那样，它们在低音方面有点令人失望。这使得音量开大时声音有些不平衡。

此外，您还可以通过 USB 或蓝牙输出声音，不过后者不提供广泛的编解码器支持。与 S26 Ultra不同，这款小巧的三星智能手机无法启动 Auracast 广播。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S26 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 17 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 三星手机内置 4,300 毫安时电池

耗电量

Galaxy S26 的功耗偏低，但仍略高于 S25。不过，随着显示屏亮度的调整，这种情况会有所改变，S26 在 GFXBench 测试中证明了自己非常节能。

三星智能手机通过线缆充电的功率仍然只有 25 瓦，在我们的测试中，充满电需要 79 分钟（50%：26 分钟；80%：47 分钟）。S26 支持无线充电和反向充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.03 / 0.29 Watt
Idle	0.45 / 0.75 / 0.93 Watt
Load	12.4 / 16.75 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy S26 4300 mAh	Xiaomi 17 7000 mAh	Google Pixel 10 Pro 4870 mAh	Vivo X300 5360 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 4000 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 3692 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 2600	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-29%	-68%	-109%	-13%	-42%	-13%	-39%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.45	0.7 -56%	1.01 -124%	0.6 -33%	0.47 -4%	1.1 -144%	0.505 ?(0.45 - 0.56, n=2) -12%	0.887 ?(0.4 - 3.5, n=142, last 2 years) -97%
Idle Average * (Watt)	0.75	1.4 -87%	1.65 -120%	2.02 -169%	1.04 -39%	1.3 -73%	1.015 ?(0.75 - 1.28, n=2) -35%	1.477 ?(0.7 - 4.5, n=142, last 2 years) -97%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	0.93	1.7 -83%	2.05 -120%	2.08 -124%	1.07 -15%	1.5 -61%	1.12 ?(0.93 - 1.31, n=2) -20%	1.664 ?(0.75 - 4.8, n=142, last 2 years) -79%
Load Average * (Watt)	12.4	5.9 52%	7.25 42%		13.33 -8%	7.6 39%	12.4 ?(12.4 - 12.4, n=2) -0%	6.78 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=112, last 2 years) 45%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	16.75	11.7 30%	19.78 -18%		16.38 2%	12 28%	16.8 ?(16.8 - 16.9, n=2) -0%	11.3 ?(4.75 - 22, n=112, last 2 years) 33%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.27 (0.745-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.3 (0.661-16.4)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.637 (0.586-0.955)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.697 (0.648-0.956)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.69 (5.79-6.88)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.1 (9.13-16.2)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.637 (0.586-0.955)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.697 (0.648-0.956)

电池寿命

尽管三星Galaxy S26 采用了 2nm 芯片组和更大容量的电池，但在我们的测试中却未能将其持续转化为更长的电池续航时间。虽然与前代产品相比，S26 的电池续航时间略有增加，但在实际 Wi-Fi 测试中，它的续航能力却略显薄弱。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		51h 02min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 146)		17h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		28h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 14min

	Samsung Galaxy S26 4300 mAh	Xiaomi 17 7000 mAh	Google Pixel 10 Pro 4870 mAh	Vivo X300 5360 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 4000 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 3692 mAh
Battery runtime		45%	-7%	11%	-6%	21%
Reader / Idle (h)	51	72.7 43%	33.1 -35%		45.2 -11%	66.7 31%
H.264 (h)	28.7	36.1 26%	24 -16%		26.5 -8%	29.4 2%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	17.7	30.9 75%	21.1 19%	19.6 11%	18 2%	20.1 14%
Load (h)	3.2	4.3 34%	3.3 3%		3 -6%	4.4 38%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

首先，Galaxy S26 是一次精心的升级，配备了新的 Exynos 2600 芯片、更大的电池和良好的显示屏，但在摄像头、充电和长期性能方面还存在不足。

Back to the verdict

Samsung Galaxy S26 - 04/27/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

93%

Keyboard

66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

68 / 69 → 98%

Weight

92%

Battery

91%

Display

91%

Games Performance

37 / 55 → 67%

Application Performance

83 / 85 → 98%

AI Performance

38%

Temperature

86%

Noise

100%

Audio

79 / 90 → 88%

Camera

82%

Average

81%

88%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
91.6%

Materials
75%

Packaging
95%

Power Use
97%

Repairability
60%

Software Updates
100%

Total Sustainability Score: 86.4%

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 88.3%	Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 960 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: List Price: 999€	167 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.30" 2340x1080 409 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2XDynamic AMOLED 2X, 8 Bit color depth
2. 89.2%	Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $779.50 XIAOMI 15T PRO Ai 5G (Compat... 2. $736.25 XIAOMI 15 5G Ai (for Tmobile... 3. $459.00 XIAOMI Redmi Note 15 Pro+ Pl... List Price: 650€	191 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.30" 2656x1220 464 PPI LTPO AMOLED
3. 88.9%	Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5 ⎘ IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB	List Price: 1199€	207 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.30" 2856x1280 497 PPI OLED
4. 88%	Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	List Price: 1049€	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.31" 2640x1216 461 PPI AMOLED
5. 87.9%	Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19 ⎘ Apple A19 GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe	List Price: 949 Euro	177 g	256 GB NVMe	6.30" 2622x1206 460 PPI OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!

Exynos和更大的电池容量使其成为明星产品--三星Galaxy S26 评测

银河精华

结论 - 三星Galaxy S26

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格 - 三星Galaxy S26

案例 -Galaxy S26 有所收获

尺寸比较

功能 - 人工蓝牙降级

软件 -Galaxy S26 的 7 年更新

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备快速 Wi-Fi 功能的小巧智能手机 7

电话功能和语音质量

照相机 - 照相机

配件和保修 -Galaxy S26 可选配 Care+ 配件。

输入设备和操作 - 快速超声波指纹识别

Galaxy S26 的显示屏经过精心调整

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - Exynos 2600 取代 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

游戏 -Galaxy S26 可进行 120fps 游戏

排放 - S26 在持续负载情况下性能明显下降

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Samsung Galaxy S26 audio analysis

Apple iPhone 17 audio analysis

电池续航时间 - 三星手机内置 4,300 毫安时电池

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可能的替代品比较

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles