小米 17 Pro 评测--紧凑型顶级智能手机在一个关键方面令人失望

Name: Xiaomi 17 Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

巧妙还是多余？

小米的新款高端手机现在也推出了配备副显示屏的小尺寸版本，为Apple iPhone 17 Pro 提供了一个替代选择。除了骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5 处理器和徕卡摄像头外，小米 17 Pro 的背面还配备了 OLED 屏幕。不过，正如通常的情况一样，这款小巧的小米手机也有一个缺陷。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/31/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Wi-Fi 7

结论 - 小米 17 Pro

小米 17 Pro 是一款结构紧凑、功能强大、质感出众的顶级智能手机。尽管它的电池容量比小米 17 略小，但依然拥有出色的续航能力。

Pro 机型的真正亮点和独特卖点是副显示屏。不过，对于潜在买家来说，它目前更像是一个 "必需品"。它的未来取决于第三方应用程序的整合，这些应用程序将把它目前有限的功能转化为日常生活中真正的附加价值。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of tradingshenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

只要你不介意进口中国版本及其在欧洲的相关缺点（无Android Auto、无 eSIM 等），这款小型旗舰手机就不会让你失望。800 美元左右的价格，在国内没有任何同类产品可与之媲美。

Pros

+ 明亮的 OLED 面板

+ 电池寿命长

+ 强大的 SoC

+ 良好的摄像头组合

+ 辅助显示屏

Cons

- 更新时间不确定

- 高热量输出

- SoC 节流

- 目前仅在中国上市

- 中文版本限制

- 第二屏幕功能

价格和供货情况 - 小米 17 Pro

在中国，小米 17 Pro 的建议零售价为 4999 元起（约合 693 美元）。我们的设备经销商 Trading Shenzhen 的进口价约为879 美元。遗憾的是，由于前代机型的缺货，我们可以有把握地预计 Pro 机型今年也不会进入欧洲市场。

结论 - 小米 17 Pro
规格 - 小米 17 Pro
手机壳 - 小巧的防水手机
功能 - 配备高速 USB 3.2 接口的便捷智能手机
软件 - 小米 17 Pro 预装Android 16
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7 的小型旗舰手机
电话功能和语音质量 - 小米 17 Pro 提供双卡双待功能
相机 - 小米手机配备了极富动感的徕卡相机
配件和保修 -Android 手机附带一个充电器
输入设备和操作 - 带有面部解锁功能的便捷智能手机
显示屏 - 小米旗舰手机采用 OLED 显示屏
性能 - 配备 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 的小型旗舰手机
排放 - 紧凑型智能手机发热
电池运行时间
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可能的替代品比较

小米首次推出了一款与Apple 的紧凑型专业版.新款小米 17 Pro 采用符合人体工程学的 6.3 英寸外形，与小米 17 Pro Max 相比仅略有缩减。设备背面的亮点是一块 2.7 英寸 AMOLED 面板，拥有 120Hz 刷新率和高亮度。

规格 - 小米 17 Pro

Xiaomi 17 Pro

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8 x 3.6 - 4.6 GHz

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 840

Memory

16 GB

Display

6.30 inch 19.5:9, 2656 x 1220 pixel 464 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, LTPO AMOLED, Secondary display (on the back): LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 3500 nits (peak) 2.7 inches, 572 x 904 pixels, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

1TB UFS 4.1 Flash, 1024 GB

, 970 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer, UWB, Miracast, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 5G：n1 / n2 / n3 / n5 / n7 / n8 / n12 / n18 / n20 / n25 / n26 / n28 / n38 / n40 / n41 / n48 / n66 / n77 / n78 / n80 / n81 / n83 / n84 / n89 ; 4G：FDD-LTE：B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B25 / B26 / B28 / B66 TDD-LTE：B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42 / B48; 3G：WCDMA：B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19; 2G：GSM：B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 151.1 x 71.8

Battery

6300 mAh Silicon-Carbon

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.7, 23 mm, 1/1.28", 1.22 µm, OIS) + 50 MPix (f/3.0, 115 mm, periscope telephoto, OIS, 5x optical zoom, macro) + 50 MPix (f/2.4, 17 mm, ultrawide, 1/2.76", 0.64µm)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.2, 21 mm, PDAF)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, charger, USB cable, case, HyperOS 3, 12 Months Warranty, GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | IP68 | Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, fanless, waterproof

Weight

192 g, Power Supply: 105 g

Price

650 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

手机壳 - 小巧的防水手机

小米 17 Pro 机身小巧，做工精良，手感极佳。边框由铝合金制成，小米采用龙晶玻璃保护正面和背面。得益于 IP68 认证，这款旗舰手机还具有很强的防尘防水性能。

屏占比高达 89.5%，显示屏几乎覆盖了手机的整个正面，设计现代感十足。背面的 2.7 英寸 LTPO OLED 显示屏位于摄像头旁边。这是一个特别值得注意的亮点，它为外形和功能都增色不少。

尺寸比较

功能 - 配备高速 USB 3.2 接口的便捷智能手机

小米 17 Pro 的超宽带 (UWB) 支持可实现精确的位置跟踪，其集成的红外爆破器可控制电视或空调等兼容设备。

它还配备了 Miracast、NFC 和符合 USB 3.2 标准的快速 USB-C 端口。

除视频输出外，该端口还支持 USB OTG，可连接外部外设。

软件 - 小米 17 Pro 预装Android 16

小米 17 Pro 使用的是小米自主研发的 HyperOS 3，它基于Android 16。与中国版小米手机的典型情况一样，它的软件只支持几个语言包。虽然没有预装德语和 Play Store，但后者可以轻松安装。

没有提供有关软件更新持续时间的信息。在我们评测期间，安全补丁是从 2025 年 10 月开始的，换句话说，非常及时。

可持续性

我们无法找到有关最新一代小米手机所用材料的准确信息或官方二氧化碳平衡表。这意味着智能手机的整体生态足迹和可修复性都无法评估。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7 的小型旗舰手机

在我们的测试中，小米 17 Pro 的快速 Wi-Fi 7 支持高速数据传输和稳定连接。与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器搭配使用时，这款旗舰手机的传输速度超过了 1,000 Mbps。尽管如此，我们还是看到了一些改进的空间，尤其是在 6 GHz 频段上。

由于小米智能手机广泛支持 5G 和 4G 频率（包括重要的 20 和 28 频段），因此即使作为进口设备，在德语国家使用也不会有任何问题。

Networking
Xiaomi 17 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1076 (min: 975) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1264 (min: 1065) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1113 (min: 1045) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1292 (min: 1201) MBit/s ∼74%
Sony Xperia 1 VII 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	868 (min: 791) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	755 (min: 722) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1142 (min: 920) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1359 (min: 679) MBit/s ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1094 (min: 655) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1154 (min: 1048) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1311 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1204 (min: 1187) MBit/s ∼69%
Apple iPhone 17 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	777 (min: 620) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1592 (min: 1420) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1020 (min: 745) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1658 (min: 1579) MBit/s ∼95%
Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	928 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	916 (min: 903) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1571 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1742 (min: 1566) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	816 (min: 564) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1520 (min: 1364) MBit/s ∼87%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1093 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1293 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1446 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	721 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	748 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1355 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼80%

Xiaomi 17 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1113 (1045-1192)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø816 (564-966)

Xiaomi 17 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1292 (1201-1351)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1364-1602)

Xiaomi 17 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1076 (975-1179)

Xiaomi 17 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1264 (1065-1369)

在室外，小米 17 Pro 能快速获取卫星信号，并以 3 米的精度确定位置。它利用双频模式下的全球主要卫星网络进行定位。

在我们的实际测试中，配合参考智能手表（Garmin Venu 2），这款小巧的旗舰手机表现非常出色。与实际行驶距离的偏差微乎其微。

电话功能和语音质量 - 小米 17 Pro 提供双卡双待功能

语音传输悦耳自然，小米 17 Pro 支持 Wi-Fi 通话、VoLTE 以及双卡双待等常用功能。中国进口设备不能使用 eSIM 卡。

相机 - 小米手机配备了极富动感的徕卡相机

小米为小米 17 Pro 配备了全新的 1/1.28 英寸高动态 Light Hunter 950L 传感器。该图像传感器的制造商尚未正式公布，但据国内消息来源称，该传感器（SC590XS）来自 SmartSens。后置迷你显示屏使主摄像头也可用于自拍。

小米 17 Pro 凭借出色的锐度和快速的快门速度带来了令人印象深刻的效果。虽然照片的动态范围也非常好，但色彩准确度还可以更好一些。在弱光环境下，这款小巧的旗舰手机给我们留下了深刻印象，模糊度极低，细节丰富。

徕卡三摄系统结合了稳固的超广角摄像头和无损 5 倍变焦的长焦镜头。在日光环境下，放大拍摄的效果非常出色，10 倍混合变焦也相当实用。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low light Ultra-wide-angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修 -Android 手机附带一个充电器

包装盒中包括一个 100 瓦的电源适配器、一个保护套和一根充电线。还预装了屏幕保护膜。此外，我们的租赁供应商 Trading Shenzhen 还提供了一个欧盟适配器。

我们的进口设备享有 12 个月保修。.如果需要保修，Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将智能手机寄往德国的送货地址。

输入设备和操作 - 带有面部解锁功能的便捷智能手机

由于设计紧凑，按键的位置非常符合人体工程学。6.3 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏上的输入都能准确记录，在日常使用中，小米 17 Pro 运行流畅，动画效果也很流畅。给我们留下深刻印象的是振动电机。

设备背面的小显示屏也很容易使用，但在我们的测试期间，它并没有提供任何显著的附加值。

用于生物识别用户的 3D 超声波指纹传感器能快速、可靠地解锁小米手机。此外，还配备了相当不安全的 2D 人脸识别功能，该功能基于使用前置摄像头的人脸解锁功能。

显示屏 - 小米旗舰手机采用 OLED 显示屏

6.3 英寸 LTPO AMOLED 面板拥有高分辨率和 120 Hz 最高刷新率，可自适应降低至 1 Hz。

虽然我们在白色背景下测量的峰值亮度仅约为 1,000 cd/m²，但在使用更相关的 APL18 测试图案时，我们获得了 3,412 cd/m² 的出色亮度。这与宣传中的 3,500 尼特峰值亮度相吻合，实现了出色的 HDR 效果。

与 OLED 显示器的通常情况一样，屏幕亮度是通过 PWM 调制控制的。这导致屏幕闪烁，根据制造商的说法，还包括护眼功能（频率：2,160 Hz）。我们对显示器的测量显示，基本闪烁频率约为 120 Hz。


1026 cd/m²	1034 cd/m²	1055 cd/m²
1063 cd/m²	1071 cd/m²	1044 cd/m²
1043 cd/m²	1053 cd/m²	1046 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1071 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1048.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1071 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.98 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
102.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.221
CCT: 6703 K

	Xiaomi 17 Pro LTPO AMOLED, 2656x1220, 6.3"	Sony Xperia 1 VII OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"	Samsung Galaxy S25+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Apple iPhone 17 OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"	Google Pixel 10 Pro OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"	Xiaomi 15 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen		-59%	-41%	-10%	50%	-20%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1071	1441 35%	1371 28%	1138 6%	2161 102%	1016 -5%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1048	1450 38%	1370 31%	1127 8%	2198 110%	1017 -3%
Brightness Distribution (%)	96	99 3%	96 0%	96 0%	94 -2%	98 2%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.98	3.2 -227%	2.7 -176%	1.07 -9%	0.7 29%	1.15 -17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.58	4.6 -78%	4.2 -63%	2.99 -16%	1.8 30%	3.57 -38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.2	2.7 -125%	2 -67%	1.8 -50%	0.8 33%	1.9 -58%
Gamma	2.221 ^99%	2.19 ^100%	2.03 ^108%	2.22 ^99%	2.19 ^100%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6703 ^97%	6476 ^100%	6450 ^101%	6516 ^100%	6646 ^98%	6677 ^97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 19 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

色彩校准和灰度偏差非常小。小米 17 Pro 也提供色彩显示设置，但 HyperOS 3 不再支持前代产品中的大量自定义选项。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.3 ms rise
0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.3 ms rise
0.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

在户外，这款小巧的旗舰手机给人留下了深刻印象。由于重量轻，显示的内容非常清晰，视角稳定性也非常出色。

性能 - 配备 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 的小型旗舰手机

如果您正在寻找目前最好的 SoC 之一，那么骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5 将是您的最佳选择。骁龙 8 第五代精英版.4.6 GHz 的峰值时钟频率使其在单核测试中获得了较高的 Geekbench 分数，但多核成绩尤为突出。不过，高通芯片组在人工智能基准测试方面仍有提升空间。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	3732 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3587 - 3831, n=5)	3692 Points +3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3587 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3136 Points -13%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	3089 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	3003 Points -16%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	2308 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=210, last 2 years)	1727 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (10620 - 12383, n=5)	11255 Points +4%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	10798 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10029 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	9456 Points -12%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	9404 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	9129 Points -15%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	6314 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=210, last 2 years)	5043 Points -53%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2390211 - 3269237, n=4)	2692258 Points +5%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2611586 Points +2%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2564453 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2271821 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2209192 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	2158729 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=153, last 2 years)	1446031 Points -44%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1338955 Points -48%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (19432 - 28557, n=4)	22175 Points +6%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	20878 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	20673 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	20028 Points -4%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	18231 Points -13%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	15738 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=189, last 2 years)	14720 Points -29%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	14076 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (12929 - 14076, n=3)	13663 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	13223 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	12414 Points -12%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	9067 Points -36%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	8446 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14076, n=148, last 2 years)	7472 Points -47%
System
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	19244 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (18137 - 19244, n=3)	18863 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17481 Points -9%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	17069 Points -11%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	14976 Points -22%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	12881 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=148, last 2 years)	11207 Points -42%
Memory
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	16984 Points
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	16511 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	16264 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (13505 - 16984, n=3)	15818 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=148, last 2 years)	8486 Points -50%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	7873 Points -54%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	7257 Points -57%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (52356 - 53231, n=3)	52655 Points +1%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	52378 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	45691 Points -13%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	44154 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	43710 Points -17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	30035 Points -43%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=148, last 2 years)	24928 Points -52%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2353 Points +4%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2257 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2143 - 2257, n=3)	2211 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1928 Points -15%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1813 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=148, last 2 years)	1675 Points -26%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	1278 Points -43%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	23141 Points 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	23122 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (22372 - 23712, n=4)	23071 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	21254 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=138, last 2 years)	19738 Points -15%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	19260 Points -17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	17652 Points -24%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	35717 Points
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=127, last 2 years)	27075 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	1987 Points
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1903 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1891 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1455 - 2381, n=3)	1875 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1477 Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	4677 Points +626%
Average of class Smartphone (81 - 5210, n=45, last 2 years)	906 Points +41%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	644 Points
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	628 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (524 - 698, n=4)	603 Points -6%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	478 Points -26%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	35502 Points +5152%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=45, last 2 years)	4242 Points +528%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	907 Points +34%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	676 Points
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	634 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (486 - 676, n=4)	596 Points -12%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	48896 Points +3164%
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=45, last 2 years)	6051 Points +304%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	3792 Points +153%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1498 Points
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1274 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (974 - 1498, n=4)	1240 Points -17%

骁龙 840 Adreno 840骁龙 8 精英 5 代内置的 GPU 芯片在 GFXBench 中取得了非常好的成绩，但不是最高分。即使是要求苛刻的游戏也能在小米 17 Pro 上流畅运行，4K 测试的成绩为 49fps。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6885 Points +1%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	6843 Points
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6588 Points -4%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6521 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	4904 Points -28%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3232 Points -53%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7029 Points +2%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	6897 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6567 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6108 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	5022 Points -27%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3281 Points -52%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26616 Points +4%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	25687 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	25431 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25174 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	21785 Points -15%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13193 Points -49%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	12656 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12400 Points -2%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	11654 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10802 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	10197 Points -19%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12747 Points +1%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	12679 Points
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11890 Points -6%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	11589 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	10389 Points -18%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	2732 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	2602 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2525 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2269 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	2124 Points -22%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1013 Points -63%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	2707 (20^min - 20^max) Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2698 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	2576 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2303 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	2197 Points -19%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1014 Points -63%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +1%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	798 fps
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	763 fps -4%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	749 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	697 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	534.3 fps -33%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	406 fps -49%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +1%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	450 fps +21%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	423 fps +14%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	421 fps +13%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	371 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	338.5 fps -9%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	282 fps -24%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	346 fps
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	308 fps -11%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	285 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	283 fps -18%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	230 fps -34%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	207 fps -40%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps -51%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	209 fps +5%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	199 fps
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	195 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	178 fps -11%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	164.8 fps -17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 fps -59%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	106 fps -12%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps -47%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	115 fps +4%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	112 fps +1%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	111 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps -4%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	69.8 fps -37%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	94 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	292 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	286 fps -2%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	285 fps -2%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	276 fps -5%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	202.5 fps -31%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	127 fps -57%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps +2%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	51 fps
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49 fps -4%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	48 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	29.6 fps -42%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25 fps -51%

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	467.799 Points +111%
Sony Xperia 1 VII (Chrome 139.0.7258.160)	307.255 Points +39%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	274.298 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 469, n=40, last 2 years)	224 Points +1%
Xiaomi 17 Pro (Chrome 141)	221.233 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 - 325, n=3)	182.6 Points -17%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	290 Points +138%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)	255 Points +109%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	239 Points +96%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	177 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (102 - 278, n=4)	154 Points +26%
Sony Xperia 1 VII (Chrome 139.0.7258.160)	149 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=148, last 2 years)	144.8 Points +19%
Xiaomi 17 Pro (Chrome 141)	122 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	110696 Points +81%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	98817 Points +61%
Sony Xperia 1 VII (Chrome 139.0.7258.160)	87682 Points +43%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)	84676 Points +38%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	84055 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (50987 - 99417, n=4)	76542 Points +25%
Xiaomi 17 Pro (Chrome 141)	61238 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=201, last 2 years)	48255 Points -21%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=156, last 2 years)	1188 ms * -132%
Xiaomi 17 Pro (Chrome 141)	511.76 ms *
Sony Xperia 1 VII (Chrome 139.0.7258.160)	501.2 ms * +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (306 - 635, n=4)	475 ms * +7%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	472.5 ms * +8%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)	423.11 ms * +17%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	388.7 ms * +24%
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	263.1 ms * +49%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi 17 Pro	Sony Xperia 1 VII	Samsung Galaxy S25+	Google Pixel 10 Pro	Xiaomi 15 Pro	Average 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		173%	88%	46%	147%	104%	65%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3876.97	3847.82 -1%	4057.35 5%	1492.74 -61%	3998.65 3%	3924 ?(3877 - 3971, n=2) 1%	2212 ?(270 - 4370, n=192, last 2 years) -43%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	3790.66	2936.71 -23%	3311.02 -13%	1353.55 -64%	3673.38 -3%	3845 ?(3791 - 3900, n=2) 1%	1835 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=192, last 2 years) -52%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	58.82	477 711%	294.51 401%	264.44 350%	409.67 596%	304 ?(58.8 - 548, n=2) 417%	293 ?(47.6 - 548, n=192, last 2 years) 398%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	598.39	613.9 3%	351.16 -41%	347.84 -42%	555.55 -7%	580 ?(561 - 598, n=2) -3%	338 ?(9.4 - 964, n=192, last 2 years) -44%

排放 - 紧凑型智能手机发热

温度

我们记录了较高的表面温度，虽然 Pro 机型的性能略好于小米 17但热引起的节流非常明显。在 3DMark 压力测试中，这款紧凑型旗舰手机的性能下降了 30%。

Max. Load

Idle


46.5 °C	45.5 °C	40.2 °C
48.2 °C	46.1 °C	45.2 °C
48.7 °C	47.2 °C	42.2 °C

Maximum: 48.7 °C
Average: 45.5 °C


39.3 °C	43 °C	43.2 °C
49.2 °C	43 °C	45.7 °C
40.6 °C	43.5 °C	46.8 °C

Maximum: 49.2 °C
Average: 43.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.3 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	96.8 % +32%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.2 % +10%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	75.3 % +2%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	73.6 %
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	61.6 % -16%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53.4 % -27%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88.7 % +27%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	75.8 % +8%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	69.9 %
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	65.4 % -6%
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	63.7 % -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.3 % -27%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	83.8 % +27%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	66.1 % 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	65.8 %
Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 % -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.9 % -10%

Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø30.8 (28.1-40.2)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø28.8 (26.6-35)

Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø107 (100.1-135.9)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø103.5 (96.3-128)

Xiaomi 17 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø30.9 (26.9-40.9)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø29.4 (28.1-33.5)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15.2 (13.9-18.1)

发言人

立体声扬声器为这款小巧的设备提供了出色的音效。耳机可通过有线 USB 端口连接，但喜欢蓝牙无线输出的用户可利用各种编解码器和新的 6.0 标准来实现。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi 17 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池运行时间

耗电量

小米 17 Pro 内置的 6,300 毫安时电池可使用现代 PPS 充电器充电，最高功率可达 100 瓦。无线充电的最大功率也可达 50 瓦。使用快速充电器，我们的充电时间为 35 分钟。

事实证明，无论是空闲运行还是负载运行，功耗都很低。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.8 / 1.4 / 1.8 Watt
Load	4.2 / 8.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi 17 Pro 6300 mAh	Sony Xperia 1 VII 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25+ 4900 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 3692 mAh	Google Pixel 10 Pro 4870 mAh	Xiaomi 15 Pro 6100 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-3%	-45%	-26%	-51%	7%	-7%	-19%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.8	0.42 47%	0.45 44%	1.1 -38%	1.01 -26%	0.6 25%	0.733 ?(0.6 - 0.83, n=4) 8%	0.853 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=162, last 2 years) -7%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.4	0.93 34%	1.09 22%	1.3 7%	1.65 -18%	0.9 36%	1.433 ?(0.8 - 2.13, n=4) -2%	1.43 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=162, last 2 years) -2%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.8	0.95 47%	1.13 37%	1.5 17%	2.05 -14%	1.1 39%	1.77 ?(1.4 - 2.18, n=4) 2%	1.609 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=162, last 2 years) 11%
Load Average * (Watt)	4.2	8.62 -105%	14.41 -243%	7.6 -81%	7.25 -73%	6.7 -60%	5.53 ?(4.2 - 6.5, n=3) -32%	7.09 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=142, last 2 years) -69%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	8.9	12.47 -40%	16.37 -84%	12 -35%	19.78 -122%	9.5 -7%	9.9 ?(8.9 - 11.7, n=3) -11%	11.2 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=142, last 2 years) -26%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.83 (0.858-8.78)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.51 (0.64-9.38)

Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.874 (0.773-1.176)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.54 (8.47-8.58)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.37 (9.34-9.41)

Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.874 (0.773-1.176)

Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)

电池寿命

小米 17 Pro 的大容量电池带来了出色的续航时间。在调节了显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）的情况下，我们通过 Wi-Fi 浏览网页时可以使用近 30 个小时。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 141)		29h 39min

	Xiaomi 17 Pro 6300 mAh	Sony Xperia 1 VII 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25+ 4900 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 3692 mAh	Google Pixel 10 Pro 4870 mAh	Xiaomi 15 Pro 6100 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)	29.7	21.4 -28%	19.8 -33%	20.1 -32%	21.1 -29%	24.1 -19%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

遗憾的是，小米 17 Pro 是一款出色的智能手机，但可能永远不会在德国正式发布。它的副显示屏肯定需要一些软件改进才能提供真正的附加值。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi 17 Pro - 10/27/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 92%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

69 / 69 → 100%

Weight

89%

Battery

96%

Display

93%

Games Performance

46 / 55 → 83%

Application Performance

84 / 85 → 98%

AI Performance

43%

Temperature

82%

Noise

100%

Audio

83 / 90 → 92%

Camera

86%

Average

70%

91%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
70%

Power Use
96.1%

Repairability
30%

Software Updates
66.7%

Total Sustainability Score: 48%

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 90.5%	Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB	Amazon: 1. $9.90 Anbzsign 2+1 Pack for Xiaomi... 2. $6.93 Milomdoi 3 Pack Privacy Scre... 3. $24.99 Magnetic Portable Charger, 1... List Price: 650€	192 g	1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.30" 2656x1220 464 PPI LTPO AMOLED
2. 88.5%	Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $3.64 Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Sony Xpe... 2. $11.99 Ibywind For Sony Xperia 1 VI... 3. $5.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... List Price: 1499€	197 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.50" 2340x1080 396 PPI OLED
3. 88.4%	Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $7.58 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 2. $7.58 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 3. $689.99 Samsung Galaxy S25 5G SM-S93... List Price: 1149 Euro	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4. 87.9%	Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19 ⎘ Apple A19 GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe	Amazon: 1. $59.00 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Tech... 2. $1,299.00 iPhone 17 Pro (Silver, 256, GB) 3. $37.99 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Sili... List Price: 949 Euro	177 g	256 GB NVMe	6.30" 2622x1206 460 PPI OLED
5. 88.9%	Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5 ⎘ IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: $1,099.00 List Price: 1199€	207 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.30" 2856x1280 497 PPI OLED
6. 89.9%	Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB	Amazon: 1. $4.99 Kicvbnco 3 Pack For Xiaomi 1... 2. $16.95 IPG Made for Xiaomi 15 Pro H... 3. AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... List Price: 810€	213 g	1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.73" 3200x1440 521 PPI AMOLED

小米 17 Pro 评测--紧凑型顶级智能手机在一个关键方面令人失望

巧妙还是多余？

结论 - 小米 17 Pro

Pros

Cons

价格和供货情况 - 小米 17 Pro

Table of Contents

规格 - 小米 17 Pro

手机壳 - 小巧的防水手机

尺寸比较

功能 - 配备高速 USB 3.2 接口的便捷智能手机

软件 - 小米 17 Pro 预装Android 16

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7 的小型旗舰手机

电话功能和语音质量 - 小米 17 Pro 提供双卡双待功能

相机 - 小米手机配备了极富动感的徕卡相机

配件和保修 -Android 手机附带一个充电器

输入设备和操作 - 带有面部解锁功能的便捷智能手机

显示屏 - 小米旗舰手机采用 OLED 显示屏

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 配备 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 的小型旗舰手机

排放 - 紧凑型智能手机发热

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Xiaomi 17 Pro audio analysis

Google Pixel 10 Pro audio analysis

电池运行时间

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可能的替代品比较

More articles related to this device

Transparency