Oppo Find X9 Ultra 评测：一款顶级智能手机，一个被忽视的弱点

Name: Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Brand: Oppo

这才是旗舰应有的样子。

OPPO 的 2026 旗舰手机再次向 "最佳拍照智能手机 "的称号发起冲击。为此，Find X9 Ultra 配备的不是一个而是两个 2 亿像素镜头。在我们的评测中，您将了解哈苏相机是否能满足您的需求，以及它的前代产品是否仍然是 "更好的 "智能手机。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 05/31/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone Wi-Fi 7

关于 Oppo Find X9 Ultra 的评价

尽管 Find X9 Ultra 的亮度控制在日常使用中略显薄弱，但 OPPO 还是为我们带来了本年度最好的智能手机之一。该手机功能丰富，相机配置一流。Find X9 Ultra 的焦距范围很宽，可以满足各种场景的拍摄需求。与 Pro 机型一样，我们再次非常喜欢 LUMO 图像处理技术。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of Oppo

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

与前代产品不同的是，Find X9 Ultra 的散热系统有时会被高通公司的高端芯片组压得喘不过气来，这意味着它在负载情况下的性能要低于 X8 Ultra。由于明显的节流现象，我们的评分有所下调。

有些遗憾的是，Oppo 没有为其 Ultra 机型提供柔光版本，因此也就没有Galaxy S26 Ultra 的磨砂替代品。

Pros

+ 精美的 LTPO 显示屏

+ 高品质外壳

+ 出色的摄像头套件

+ 出色的扬声器

+ 超大电池

+ 快速 SoC

Cons

- OLED 面板亮度变暗

- 高温和 SoC 大规模节流

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 的价格和上市时间

Find X9 Ultra 在德国的建议零售价为 1,699 欧元，可通过Amazon.de 购买。有琥珀色（Tundra Umber）和橙色（Canyon Orange）可供选择。供货情况、价格和配置可能因地区而异。作为一款进口产品，Oppo 的旗舰产品已经可以从深圳贸易公司购买，价格为 1,080 欧元。白色版本，可选 1 TB 存储空间。

$854.99
OnePlus 15, 16GB RAM + 512GB Storage, Dual-SIM, Unlocked Android Smartphone, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 7300mAh Battery, Infinite Black
$1,174.99
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Unlocked Android Smartphone, 512GB, Privacy Display, Galaxy AI, AI Camera, Super Fast Charging 3.0, Durable Battery, 2026, US 1 Year Warranty, Black
$997.49
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Unlocked Android Smartphone, 256GB, Privacy Display, Galaxy AI, AI Camera, Super Fast Charging 3.0, Durable Battery, 2026, US 1 Year Warranty, Black

Bestpreis 1526 € Gomibo.de

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 512GB tundra umber

2. 1549 € Proshop.de
3. 1570 € Gomibo.at
4. 1629 € galaxus

关于 Oppo Find X9 Ultra 的评价
Oppo Find X9 Ultra 规格
外壳：防水Android 智能手机，防护等级 IP69
功能特点Oppo Find X9 Ultra 配备红外爆破器和 USB 3.2
软件：旗舰手机Android 16 和长期更新
通信与全球导航卫星系统：Oppo Find X9 Ultra 配备 WiFi 7 和 5G
电话功能和语音质量：高端手机配备双卡和 eSIM 卡
摄像头Oppo Find X9 Ultra 配备哈苏和 LUMO 引擎
配件和保修：Android 智能手机，带电源适配器和远摄转换器
输入设备和操作：Oppo Find X9 Ultra 的一流超声波传感器
显示屏：配备 LTPO OLED 屏幕的旗舰手机，存在调光问题
性能奥普 Find X9 Ultra 采用骁龙芯片组
排放：Oppo Find X9 Ultra 比Galaxy S26 Ultra 更热，且有明显的节流现象
电池续航时间：Android 配备大容量硅碳电池的智能手机
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可能的替代品一览

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 规格

Oppo Find X9 Ultra (Find X9 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8c/8t, 2 x 4.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Prime, 6 x 3.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Performance, Oryon v3

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 840

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.82 inch 19.8:9, 3168 x 1440 pixel 510 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, LTPO, 2160 Hz PWM-Dimming, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 480.4 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66/B71), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n26/n28/n30/n38/n40/n41/n66/n71/n75/n77/n78/n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.1 x 163.16 x 76.97

Battery

7050 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode (Gen 3)

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 200 MPix (f/1.5, OIS, 1/1.12", Videos @4320p/30fps) + 200 MPix (f/2.2, 1/1.28", OIS, 3x optical, Tele) + 50 MPix (f/3.5, OIS, 10x optical, Periscop-Tele) + 50 MPix (f/2.0, wide); + 3.2MPix (f/2.4, monochrom)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.4, AF, Videos @2160p/60fps)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, case, USB cable, sim tool, charger (china), ColorOS 16, 24 Months Warranty, HDR (HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | SAR value: 0.99W/kg head, 1.29W/kg body | aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC, AAC, SBC, fanless, waterproof

Released

04/21/2026

Weight

236 g

Price

1699 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳：防水Android 智能手机，防护等级 IP69

Find X9 Ultra 的手机壳通过了 IP68 和 IP69 认证，因此具有防水功能。在没有保护套的情况下使用这款智能手机的人会注意到，其棱角分明的设计在一定程度上影响了人体工学。由于 Oppo 手机本来就又大又重，因此握持起来并不十分舒适。

Find X9 Ultra 的亮点在于其高档的外观和出色的制造质量。6.82 英寸屏幕周围的边框也非常纤薄。与的前代产品一样Find X9 Ultra 的机身左侧有一个可自由分配的按键，右侧有一个电容式按键，用于分配相机功能。

在 Find X8 Ultra 的继任者中，Oppo 没有使用 Crystal Shield 玻璃，而是使用了康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2。没有采用柔光版本的磨砂面板，如 Galaxy S26 Ultra.

尺寸比较

Oppo Find X9 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Xiaomi 17 Ultra Vivo X300 Ultra DIN A6 ❌

功能特点Oppo Find X9 Ultra 配备红外爆破器和 USB 3.2

Find X9 Ultra 提供现代蓝牙 6.0、NFC 芯片、红外触发器和快速 USB 3.2 端口（Gen 1），支持有线图像输出。此外还支持 USB OTG。在我们使用三星便携式固态硬盘 T7 进行的拷贝测试中，Oppo 的旗舰产品达到了稳定的 360 MB/s。不过，它缺少用于高精度定位的 UWB 芯片和气压计。

软件：旗舰手机Android 16 和长期更新

Find X9 Ultra 搭载基于Android 16 的 ColorOS 16。选择全球版本的用户将获得五个主要Android 版本和六年的最新安全补丁。不过，由于我们在这里找不到任何官方信息，因此对中国版本的计划软件支持存在一些问号。

可持续性

包装显然不含塑料。根据EPREL 数据库Find X9 Ultra 的可修复性等级为良好（B）。

制造商提供了部分材料的回收率，但有关生态足迹的信息并不全面。与谷歌或三星在透明度方面，Oppo 还有待提高。

通信与全球导航卫星系统：Oppo Find X9 Ultra 配备 WiFi 7 和 5G

Find X9 Ultra 的欧洲版和中国版在频率覆盖方面没有实际差异。Oppo 手机提供许多 LTE 和 5G 频段。

在 Wi-Fi 网络中，得益于 WiFi 7，Find X9 Ultra 的传输速度非常快。结合我们的新参考路由器华硕 RT-BE96U BE19000，Oppo 手机实现了非常高的速度。即使在接收过程中数据传输速率明显下降，也能达到 1,800 MBit/s。

Networking
Oppo Find X9 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	4314 (min: 4191) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	3410 (min: 1851) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	946 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	927 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1844 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1619 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2017 (min: 1945) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2173 (min: 1784) MBit/s ∼64%
Vivo X300 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1961 (min: 1265) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2080 (min: 1872) MBit/s ∼61%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	959 (min: 636) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1595 (min: 953) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	922 (min: 721) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1697 (min: 1513) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1046 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1278 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1501 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2764 (min: 1961) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2554 (min: 2080) MBit/s ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	694 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	740 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1264 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1399 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2175 (min: 407) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2015 (min: 398) MBit/s ∼59%

Oppo Find X8 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø595 (484-684)

Oppo Find X8 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1721 (1348-1780)

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.1.3: Ø4314 (4191-4439)

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.1.3: Ø3406 (1851-3797)

双频连接可用于全球网络的卫星定位。在室内可快速实现卫星定位，精度与室外类似。

在一次骑车旅行中，我们将 Find X9 Ultra 与华为手表 Fit 5.虽然我们观察到了一些小误差，但 OPPO 手机非常适合导航任务。

电话功能和语音质量：高端手机配备双卡和 eSIM 卡

在通话方面，这款旗舰手机提供 VoNR 和 Wi-Fi 通话等标准功能，并为两张 nano-SIM 卡预留了空间。需要双 SIM 卡功能的用户还可以选择集成 eSIM 卡。语音质量不错。

摄像头Oppo Find X9 Ultra 配备哈苏和 LUMO 引擎

通过与哈苏的合作，Oppo 再次打造了一套出色的相机组合。与 Vivo X300 Ultra的三摄像头不同，Find X9 Ultra 的主摄像头是索尼 LYT-901，同时还配备了三个额外的镜头，不过其中一些传感器的尺寸要小得多。

虽然 2 亿像素的长焦镜头也有一个 1/1.28 英寸的大传感器，但超广角镜头，特别是第二个 1/2.76 英寸的长焦镜头必须接受一些妥协。尽管如此，在日光下仍然可以获得出色的效果。尤其是 5000 万像素潜望镜镜头，其 10 倍光学变焦在日常使用中给我们留下了深刻印象。

OPPO 旗舰机型的 20000 万像素主摄像头具有令人愉悦的锐度和强大的动态范围。大光圈也确保了出色的弱光能力，尽管我们认为 Vivo 的相机算法在图像处理方面略胜一筹。特别是在传感器达到全分辨率和光线条件不太理想的情况下，Find X9 Ultra 的细节捕捉能力略逊于 X300 Ultra。作为回报，Oppo 的自动 LUMO 图像处理功能通过可变分辨率提供了更多细节，而无需用户不断干预。

在我们的测量中，多光谱传感器确保了准确的色彩还原，只有少数异常值。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

ColorChecker Oppo Find X9 Ultra: 4.07 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 8.03 ∆E

配件和保修：Android 智能手机，带电源适配器和远摄转换器

中国版附带保护套和快速充电器、充电线（USB-C 转 USB-A）、SIM 卡工具和快速入门指南。此外，还预装了屏幕保护膜。全球版本不包括 SuperVOOC 充电器。

哈苏地球探索者套件也可选配，建议零售价为 599 欧元。它包括一个远摄转换器和一个带相机快门按钮和控制转盘的相机手柄。

我们的进口设备提供 12 个月的保修.如果需要保修，Trading Shenzhen 允许将智能手机寄往德国的送货地址。全球型号的保修期为 24 个月，但保修条款可能因地区而异。

输入设备和操作：Oppo Find X9 Ultra 的一流超声波传感器

Find X9 Ultra 非常易于操作，这主要归功于其 300 Hz 采样率。不过，我们发现它的振动电机比起 Vivo或三星手机。3D 超声波传感器没有任何值得批评的地方，它能快速、可靠地识别我们的手指。

显示屏：配备 LTPO OLED 屏幕的旗舰手机，存在调光问题

6.82 英寸 144 Hz AMOLED 面板具有 QHD+ 高分辨率，据 Oppo 称，其峰值亮度为 3,600 尼特。

在我们的测量中，我们在播放 HDR 视频和使用 APL18 模式时仅达到约 1,800 cd/m²，而 APL18 模式更适合日常使用。换句话说，这只是宣传数字的一半。此外，我们测得的亮度值无法长时间保持，Find X9 Ultra 在白色背景下很快就会降低亮度。在日常使用中，自动亮度控制也太暗，不符合我们的口味。三星无法根据个人喜好进行 "校准"。

OPPO 使用脉宽调制来控制屏幕亮度。根据制造商的说法，它提供了 2160 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光，从而将闪烁的负面影响降至最低。我们还使用 Rigol 软件测得基频仅为 90 赫兹。


1158 cd/m²	1151 cd/m²	1140 cd/m²
1156 cd/m²	1143 cd/m²	1139 cd/m²
1153 cd/m²	1161 cd/m²	1145 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1161 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1149.6 cd/m² Minimum: 0.88 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1143 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
CCT: 6717 K

	Oppo Find X9 Ultra AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"	Vivo X300 Ultra LTPO OLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"	Xiaomi 17 Ultra AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"
Screen		-29%	-3%	3%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1143	1339 17%	1568 37%	1303 14%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1150	1381 20%	1535 33%	1300 13%
Brightness Distribution (%)	98	94 -4%	96 -2%	98 0%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.2	2.5 -108%	1.23 -3%	1.12 7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.9	3.8 -100%	3.22 -69%	2.25 -18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	1.7 -0%	1.9 -12%	1.7 -0%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	2.05 ^107%	2.251 ^98%	2.242 ^98%
CCT	6717 ^97%	6498 ^100%	6552 ^99%	6404 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3528 cd/m² +95%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2713 cd/m² +50%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2154 cd/m² +19%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1807 cd/m²

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4020 cd/m² +130%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3648 cd/m² +109%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2975 cd/m² +70%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1746 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

90 Hz
Amplitude: 15.51 %
Secondary Frequency: 2173 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7822 (minimum: 1.31 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

我们使用卡尔曼分析软件检查色彩偏差。在 "自然+暖色 "配置文件中，使用的是 sRGB 色彩空间，几乎完全覆盖。肉眼无法看到单个色彩的差异，测得的 DeltaE 值也非常低。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.4365 ms rise
0.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.4525 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.5285 ms rise
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.87 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms).

性能奥普 Find X9 Ultra 采用骁龙芯片组

与 Find X9 Pro不同的是，Oppo 没有使用联发科 Dimensity 9500Ultra 机型采用了高通技术。高通骁龙 8 第五代精英版Find X9 Ultra 的性能非常强大，尤其是在 Geekbench 多核测试中。而 OPPO 手机在 AI 基准测试中的表现则稍逊一筹。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	3759 Points +2%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3722 Points +1%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	3673 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3462 - 3831, n=18)	3651 Points -1%
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3462 Points -6%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	3145 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=198, last 2 years)	1841 Points -50%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	11411 Points +1%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	11342 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	11337 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9979 - 12383, n=18)	11083 Points -2%
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	10733 Points -5%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	9722 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=198, last 2 years)	5472 Points -52%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9790 - 28557, n=11)	20100 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	19499 Points +27%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	18897 Points +23%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	18697 Points +22%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	15387 Points
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=155, last 2 years)	15216 Points -1%

CrossMark - Overall
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2576 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	2543 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1698 - 2856, n=13)	2351 Points +18%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	1998 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	1689 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=114, last 2 years)	1204 Points -40%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	14611 Points +10%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	13308 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5640 - 16690, n=12)	12942 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	11953 Points -10%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	11073 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=129, last 2 years)	7902 Points -41%
System
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	20567 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9356 - 21153, n=12)	17519 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	17435 Points +11%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	15667 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	15326 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=129, last 2 years)	11530 Points -26%
Memory
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	18561 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5531 - 24052, n=12)	15923 Points +2%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	15598 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	11234 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	10780 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=129, last 2 years)	9042 Points -42%
Graphics
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	59787 Points
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	51642 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9859 - 61797, n=12)	48633 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	47299 Points -21%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	42332 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=129, last 2 years)	27504 Points -54%
Web
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2358 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	2297 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1561 - 2587, n=12)	2184 Points +1%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2165 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2095 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=129, last 2 years)	1734 Points -20%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	25289 Points +36%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	24002 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (10671 - 24002, n=9)	20825 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=114, last 2 years)	20780 Points +12%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	18565 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	12176 Points -34%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=92, last 2 years)	17787 Points +1021%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	2076 Points +31%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1878 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (774 - 2381, n=7)	1683 Points +6%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	1587 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	995 Points -37%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	768 Points +44%
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	711 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	704 Points +32%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=105, last 2 years)	684 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (511 - 843, n=16)	643 Points +20%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	534 Points
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=105, last 2 years)	2715 Points +393%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	757 Points +37%
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	709 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	679 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (486 - 843, n=16)	629 Points +14%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	551 Points
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 49889, n=105, last 2 years)	4037 Points +205%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1769 Points +34%
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1622 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	1530 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (974 - 1987, n=16)	1438 Points +9%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	1322 Points

Antutu v11 - Score
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	4255136 Points
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	4153982 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3753628 - 4273120, n=7)	4039161 Points -5%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3953784 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	3882009 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (584158 - 4273120, n=32, last 2 years)	2553414 Points -40%

在 GPU 基准测试中，Find X9 Ultra 和 Galaxy S26 Ultra不相上下。处理器 Adreno 840的性能与三星旗舰手机的图形适配器处于同一水平，远远领先于 Vivo X300 Ultra.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8053 Points +11%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7432 Points +3%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7233 Points
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7087 Points -2%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6691 Points -7%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7735 Points +6%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7452 Points +3%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7265 Points
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7098 Points -2%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6684 Points -8%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	30624 Points +2%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	30187 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	30076 Points
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	29984 Points 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	25847 Points -14%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14321 Points +3%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13925 Points
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13542 Points -3%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12911 Points -7%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11973 Points -14%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	19359 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14525 Points -25%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13589 Points -30%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12895 Points -33%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11983 Points -38%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3088 Points +3%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2989 Points
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2954 Points -1%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2823 Points -6%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2538 Points -15%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3084 Points +2%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3032 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3023 Points
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2796 Points -8%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2584 Points -15%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	887 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	813 fps -8%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	776 fps -13%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	764 fps -14%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	711 fps -20%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	489 fps +11%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	441 fps
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	431 fps -2%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	429 fps -3%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	411 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	385 fps +5%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	367 fps
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	361 fps -2%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	324 fps -12%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	288 fps -22%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	106 fps +77%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	241 fps
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	217 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	214 fps -11%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	212 fps -12%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	201 fps -17%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	109 fps +82%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	142 fps
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	129 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	127 fps -11%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	119 fps -16%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	118 fps -17%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	355 fps +5%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	339 fps
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	338 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	322 fps -5%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	321 fps -5%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps +2%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	58 fps
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	55 fps -5%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	53 fps -9%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	52 fps -10%

Jetstream 2 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 5

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	429.726 Points +68%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (Chrome 143)	411.755 Points +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 - 480, n=10)	272 Points +7%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra (Chrome 148)	255.324 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=80, last 2 years)	216 Points -15%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)	205.435 Points -20%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (Chrome 143)	118347 Points +80%
Vivo X300 Ultra (Chrome 147)	114123 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	105762 Points +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (47984 - 126661, n=11)	85101 Points +29%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra (Chrome 148)	65887 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)	59387 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=159, last 2 years)	51423 Points -22%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=137, last 2 years)	1078 ms * -99%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)	612.34 ms * -13%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra (Chrome 148)	541.9 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (284 - 799, n=15)	454 ms * +16%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (Chrome 143)	295.6 ms * +45%
Vivo X300 Ultra (Chrome 147)	295.2 ms * +46%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	283.6 ms * +48%

WebXPRT 5 - Overall
Vivo X300 Ultra (Chrome 147)	104 Points +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (67 - 104, n=2)	85.5 Points +28%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra (Chrome 148)	67 Points
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 104, n=11, last 2 years)	63.9 Points -5%

* ... smaller is better

	Oppo Find X9 Ultra	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra	Vivo X300 Ultra	Xiaomi 17 Ultra	Oppo Find X8 Ultra	Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-39%	-34%	-10%	-26%	-24%	-49%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	4121.89	3626.09 -12%	2143.53 -48%	3987.92 -3%	3754.43 -9%	3636 ?(1954 - 4366, n=37) -12%	2238 ?(270 - 4370, n=183, last 2 years) -46%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	4098.07	1658.91 -60%	2352.64 -43%	3974.23 -3%	3564.22 -13%	3185 ?(339 - 4113, n=37) -22%	1919 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=183, last 2 years) -53%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	578.32	513.44 -11%	365.12 -37%	547.56 -5%	375.9 -35%	412 ?(279 - 614, n=37) -29%	307 ?(47.6 - 614, n=183, last 2 years) -47%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	723.61	207.16 -71%	661.37 -9%	524.05 -28%	389.28 -46%	494 ?(48.2 - 1071, n=37) -32%	360 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=183, last 2 years) -50%

排放：Oppo Find X9 Ultra 比Galaxy S26 Ultra 更热，且有明显的节流现象

温度

废热是个问题，几乎所有顶级智能手机都会遇到这个问题。骁龙 8 精英 5 代.在持续负载情况下，3DMark 压力测试的性能会明显下降。我们测得的机箱温度高达 50 °C。

Max. Load

Idle


49.4 °C	49.8 °C	49.3 °C
50.7 °C	50 °C	49 °C
49 °C	49.8 °C	46.4 °C

Maximum: 50.7 °C
Average: 49.3 °C


48 °C	48 °C	43.4 °C
47.1 °C	47.9 °C	45.3 °C
43.9 °C	47.8 °C	45.1 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 46.3 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 49.3 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.7 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	81.4 % +28%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	67.4 % +6%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	63.7 %
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60.8 % -5%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.4 % -19%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	88.9 % +53%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	73 % +25%
Vivo X300 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60.4 % +4%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	58.2 %
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54 % -7%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	94 % +100%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	70.5 % +50%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.2 % +16%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	46.9 %

Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø32.5 (24.6-42.2)

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø36.6 (35.6-40)

Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø124.6 (99.4-156.1)

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø129.4 (115.5-141.9)

Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø34.9 (20.3-43.3)

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø37.3 (36.9-39.3)

发言人

作为一款智能手机，Oppo 旗舰产品的立体声扬声器音质出色，粉红噪声的频率响应线性。Find X8 Ultra 的继任者明显更有现场感，尤其是在高音和超高音方面。

此外，还可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 6.0 输出音频。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oppo Find X9 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Oppo Find X8 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间：Android 配备大容量硅碳电池的智能手机

耗电量

Oppo 在中国和欧洲销售的这款智能手机配备了强大的 7,050 毫安时硅碳电池，充电功率高达 100 瓦，无线充电功率为 50 瓦。使用超级充电器充满电约需 50 分钟。通过 55 瓦 PPS，可支持第三方电源适配器。

空闲时功耗略高，超过 1 瓦，但总体效率没有问题。不过 Galaxy S26 Ultra证明更为经济。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.06 / 0.38 Watt
Idle	1.1 / 1.27 / 1.3 Watt
Load	10.74 / 11.33 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Oppo Find X9 Ultra 7050 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5000 mAh	Vivo X300 Ultra 6600 mAh	Xiaomi 17 Ultra 6800 mAh	Oppo Find X8 Ultra 6100 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-6%	15%	11%	7%	8%	3%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.1	0.56 49%	0.57 48%	0.8 27%	0.8 27%	0.813 ?(0.57 - 1.2, n=12) 26%	0.872 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=143, last 2 years) 21%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.27	1.18 7%	1.1 13%	1.1 13%	1.1 13%	1.283 ?(0.74 - 2.13, n=12) -1%	1.463 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=143, last 2 years) -15%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.3	1.33 -2%	1.26 3%	1.2 8%	1.6 -23%	1.47 ?(0.75 - 2.18, n=12) -13%	1.65 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=143, last 2 years) -27%
Load Average * (Watt)	10.74	14.91 -39%	8.6 20%	6.1 43%	8.5 21%	7.97 ?(4.2 - 11.4, n=10) 26%	6.84 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=112, last 2 years) 36%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	11.33	16.58 -46%	12.4 -9%	15.3 -35%	11.8 -4%	11.3 ?(8.9 - 15.3, n=10) -0%	11.3 ?(4.75 - 22, n=112, last 2 years) -0%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.96 (0.816-11.3)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.66 (1.309-16.6)

Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.713 (0.653-0.793)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.853 (0.784-1.211)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (8.09-11.4)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.9 (3.12-16.7)

Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.713 (0.653-0.793)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.853 (0.784-1.211)

电池寿命

在我们的 Wi-Fi 电池测试中，Oppo 的旗舰产品在显示屏亮度调至 150 cd/m² 的情况下可持续超过 28 小时。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 148)		28h 9min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Oppo Find X9 Ultra 7050 mAh	28.2 h
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5000 mAh	17.9 h
Vivo X300 Ultra 6600 mAh	23 h
Xiaomi 17 Ultra 6800 mAh	25.9 h
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 6100 mAh	22.9 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 绝对是一款顶级旗舰手机，但在日常显示使用中存在一些小弱点。

Back to the verdict

Oppo Find X9 Ultra - 05/26/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

92%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 90%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

68 / 69 → 99%

Weight

87%

Battery

95%

Display

92%

Games Performance

39 / 55 → 71%

Application Performance

80 / 85 → 94%

AI Performance

37%

Temperature

80%

Noise

100%

Audio

79 / 90 → 88%

Camera

90%

Average

72%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
85%

Power Use
95.6%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
94.5%

Total Sustainability Score: 56.7%

可能的替代品一览

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 88.9%	Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	List Price: 1699€	236 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.82" 3168x1440 510 PPI AMOLED
2. 89.8%	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 1449€	214 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.90" 3120x1440 498 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
3. 89.1%	Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 1999€	232 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.82" 3168x1440 510 PPI LTPO OLED
4. 90.4%	Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $1,174.99 Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Un... 2. $929.99 XIAOMI 17 5G Ai (Compatible ... 3. $759.50 XIAOMI 15T PRO Ai 5G (Compat... List Price: 950€	224 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 评测：一款顶级智能手机，一个被忽视的弱点

这才是旗舰应有的样子。

关于 Oppo Find X9 Ultra 的评价

Pros

Cons

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 的价格和上市时间

Table of Contents

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 规格

外壳：防水Android 智能手机，防护等级 IP69

尺寸比较

功能特点Oppo Find X9 Ultra 配备红外爆破器和 USB 3.2

软件：旗舰手机Android 16 和长期更新

可持续性

通信与全球导航卫星系统：Oppo Find X9 Ultra 配备 WiFi 7 和 5G

电话功能和语音质量：高端手机配备双卡和 eSIM 卡

摄像头Oppo Find X9 Ultra 配备哈苏和 LUMO 引擎

配件和保修：Android 智能手机，带电源适配器和远摄转换器

输入设备和操作：Oppo Find X9 Ultra 的一流超声波传感器

显示屏：配备 LTPO OLED 屏幕的旗舰手机，存在调光问题

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能奥普 Find X9 Ultra 采用骁龙芯片组

排放：Oppo Find X9 Ultra 比Galaxy S26 Ultra 更热，且有明显的节流现象

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Oppo Find X9 Ultra audio analysis

Oppo Find X8 Ultra audio analysis

电池续航时间：Android 配备大容量硅碳电池的智能手机

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可能的替代品一览

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles