谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 智能手机评测：配备顶级摄像头的紧凑型 AI 怪兽

Name: Google Pixel 10 Pro
Brand: Google

温和的进化

谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 以其强大的 OLED 显示屏、全新的摄像技术和巧妙的人工智能功能给人留下了深刻印象。在这篇评测中，我们将展示这款高端智能手机在日常使用中的表现，以及它到底有哪些亮点。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/02/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Google Pixel Smartphone Touchscreen

对谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的评价

谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 是一款高品质的紧凑型旗舰智能手机，配备大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2、铝合金边框和 IP68 认证。功能全面，但并非完美无瑕。虽然这款智能手机符合当前的标准，如蓝牙 6.0、UWB、NFC、Wi-Fi 7 和新的 "Pixelsnap "磁铁，但 USB 端口对文件系统仍然有限，存储选项有时也不一致--即使在更昂贵的机型上也缺少 UFS 4.0。

在软件和 AI 功能方面，Pixel 10 Pro 尤为强大。 Android 16 配备了七年更新、双子座功能和实时翻译。不过，后者似乎仍不成熟，经常提供不正确的结果。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

显示屏的高亮度和良好的色彩还原给人留下了深刻印象，但存在 PWM 闪烁的问题，尽管有 480 Hz 的选项，但对于敏感的用户来说，这并不能起到任何缓解作用。在性能方面，Tensor G5 落后于竞争对手。日常运行非常流畅，但基准测试和游戏测试却显示出明显的不足。尤其是游戏玩家，不得不忍受帧率下降和缺乏光线追踪功能的问题。

相机功能多样，整体效果非常出色，但在细节、动态范围和弱光质量方面达到了极限。人工智能有时工作不稳定，特别是在变焦时，尤其是在拍摄字体或移动物体时。尽管如此，它无疑是智能手机中最好的设置之一。

Pros

+ 做工精良

+ 出色的摄像头设置

+ 实用的像素抓拍

+ 电池寿命长

+ IP68 认证

+ 7 年更新

Cons

- 最低亮度时 PWM 频率较低

- 最便宜的版本内存很小

- 旧的 UFS 3.1 内存

- 建筑物内的 GNSS 功能较弱

- 没有双 eSIM 卡

价格和供应情况

Pixel 10 Pro 可直接从Google以及MediaMarkt和德国亚马逊等所有主要零售商。

这款智能手机还可在美国亚马逊上购买，售价 1099 美元。

$1,099.00

Google Pixel 10 Pro - Unlocked Android Smartphone - Gemini AI Assistant, Triple Rear Camera System, Fast-Charging 24+ Hour Battery, and 6.3" Super Actua Display - Jade - 256 GB (2025 Model)

对谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的评价
规格谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro
构建：Pixel 10 Pro 有四种颜色
功能特点新增 Pixelsnap
软件：Pixel 10 Pro 的七年更新
通信和全球导航卫星系统：Wi-Fi 7 和双频全球导航卫星系统
手机功能和语音质量配备双卡双待的 Pixel 10 Pro
摄像头Pixel 10 Pro 强大的三摄像头
配件和保修：Pixel Care+ 仅在美国
输入设备和操作：Pixel 手机中的超声波指纹识别器
显示屏Pixel 10 Pro 采用明亮的 LTPO OLED 显示屏
性能张量 G5 落后于竞争对手
游戏快速出汗
排放物 - 配备 Auracast 的 Pixel 手机
电池寿命：谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 电池容量为 4,870 毫安时
Notebookcheck 对谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的总体印象
潜在竞争对手比较

谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 是继像素 9 Pro在性能、连接性和人工智能功能等方面进行了改进。显示屏的 PWM 频率可选择性地提高了一倍，在电池充电方面也有创新。

Pixel 10 Pro 有四种存储配置可供选择：128 GB（1099 欧元）、256 GB（1199 欧元）、512 GB（1329 欧元）和 1 TB（1589 欧元）。不过，并非所有存储选项都有所有颜色版本。

规格谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro

Google Pixel 10 Pro (Pixel 10 Series)

Processor

Google Tensor G5 8 x 2.3 - 3.8 GHz, Laguna

Graphics adapter

IMG DXT-48-1536

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.30 inch 20:9, 2856 x 1280 pixel 497 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, LTPO (1 - 120 Hz), Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 232 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer, OTG, UWB, Thread, Titan M2

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71, 75), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79), NB-IoT (Band 23, 255, 256), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 152.8 x 72

Battery

4870 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.68, 24 mm, 1/1.3", OIS) + 48 MPix (5x optical zoom, f/2.8, 110 mm, 1/2.55", OIS) + 48 MPix (Ultra Wide / Macro, f/1.7, 12mm, 1/2.55"); Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 42 MPix (f/2.2, 17 mm, AF)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB-C-Cabel, SIM-Tool, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC | Auracast | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 221.57 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT | Body-SAR: 1.39 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.99 W/kg | max. charging speed: 30 W (wired) / 15 W (wireless), fanless, waterproof

Weight

207 g

Price

1199 Euro

Amazon

$1,099.00

Links

Google homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

构建：Pixel 10 Pro 有四种颜色

谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 有月光石、瓷器、黑曜石和翡翠（我们的测试设备）四种颜色可供选择。这款智能手机的名义厚度为 8.6 毫米（我们测量的厚度为 8.25 毫米），加上摄像头驼峰后厚度为 11.9 毫米。正面和背面均由康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 制成，而边框则由高度抛光的铝合金制成。

Pixel 10 Pro 的做工非常精良，仅在后玻璃和边框之间的缝隙中显示出极小的不规则。它可以承受扭转尝试，并发出轻微的脆响。这款谷歌智能手机通过了 IP68 认证，因此具有防尘和防水功能。

尺寸比较

功能特点新增 Pixelsnap

Pixel 10 Pro 提供 128、256、512 或 1,024 GB 存储容量，不支持 microSD 卡。不过，并非所有存储版本都有所有颜色可供选择。我们还发现 128 GB 版本对于高端智能手机来说太小了。

谷歌已将蓝牙升级到 6.0 版本。其他功能与前代产品非常相似：NFC、UWB 和红外测温仪再次出现。

不过，新功能是 Pixelsnap。它类似于Apple 的 MagSafe，背面有一组磁铁，可以用来锁定配件和充电器。顺便提一下，在测试中，Pixel 10 Pro 与 MagSafe 充电面配合得非常完美。

USB 端口根据 3.2 标准（第一代）工作，并与三星便携式固态硬盘 T7可实现不错的传输速率（221.57 MB/s）。不过，它只支持 FAT32 和 exFAT 文件系统，甚至无法读取 NTFS。

也可以进行有线图像输出，但只能镜像屏幕。

软件：Pixel 10 Pro 的七年更新

谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 随Android 16 提供，并将在未来七年内（从该设备在美国谷歌商店首次上市起）获得更新。

其亮点是众多人工智能功能，如双子座、双子座纳米、双子座实时、Circle to Search、改进的实时翻译和图像编辑功能。此外，还包括谷歌自己的免费 VPN。

可持续性

在可持续发展报告中，谷歌对 Pixel 10 Pro 进行了全面介绍，并提供了二氧化碳排放量和可回收材料比例的具体数据。外包装不含塑料。

根据iFixit、有经验的用户可以根据说明书和智能手机备件自行维修 Pixel 10 Pro。不过，在撰写本文时，这些资料尚未提供。

通信和全球导航卫星系统：Wi-Fi 7 和双频全球导航卫星系统

在城市环境中，谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的手机接收效果很好，无可挑剔。频率覆盖堪称典范，因此在全球范围内都不会出现连接问题。

Wi-Fi 7 支持三个频段。结合我们的华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器，谷歌智能手机实现了较高且基本稳定的传输速率。

Networking
Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	928 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	916 (min: 903) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1571 MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1742 (min: 1566) MBit/s ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1058 (min: 518) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1167 (min: 1006) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1210 (min: 998) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1201 (min: 1184) MBit/s ∼67%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	622 (min: 487) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	921 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	969 (min: 436) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1387 (min: 1360) MBit/s ∼77%
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	876 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	871 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1386 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1793 (min: 1671) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor Magic7 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	981 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	829 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1884 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1569 (min: 1486) MBit/s ∼88%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	957 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1131 (min: 755) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1270 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1500 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	728 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	747 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1350 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1409 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼79%

Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1543 (485-1715)

Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1365 (628-1900)

Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1741 (1566-1859)

Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1791 (1671-1841)

Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø928 (844-962)

Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø861 (445-968)

Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø915 (903-923)

Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø869 (785-951)

Pixel 10 Pro 使用双频 GNSS 进行定位，支持所有全球卫星系统。卫星定位在室内需要较长的时间，而且不是特别准确。而室外接收则非常快速和准确。

我们将谷歌手机与 Garmin Venu 2健身智能手表进行了比较。Pixel 10 Pro 的准确度稍低，偶尔会有点偏离路径，但这不应该成为导航任务的限制因素。

手机功能和语音质量配备双卡双待的 Pixel 10 Pro

当把谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 放在耳边时，它的语音质量非常好。只要周围环境不太嘈杂，声音就能自然清晰地传达出来。不过，如果确实如此，Pixel 用户的声音听起来会比较闷，有时甚至难以理解。

当然，VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话也在其中。这款智能手机可以使用 nano-SIM。eSIM 卡可以作为替代或补充，但遗憾的是不支持双实体 SIM 卡。

Pixel 智能手机还可以在通话过程中实时翻译通话内容。不过，这必须首先在手机应用设置中激活。这并不需要在线连接，因为所需的 1.55 GB 数据必须提前下载到手机中。

遗憾的是，到目前为止只有少数几种语言可用，而且翻译经常不准确或错误。脏话经常被忽略或被简单地翻译成正面的内容。扬声器的声音也可用于翻译，这一点我们很喜欢。

另一个新功能是可以发送音频表情符号，然后将其转换成声音。

摄像头Pixel 10 Pro 强大的三摄像头

前置 4200 万像素自动对焦镜头用作自拍摄像头。它采用像素分档技术，因此拍摄出来的照片大小约为 10MP，但在弱光环境下效果也不错。自拍摄像头的质量令人印象深刻，能拍摄出均衡的照片。视频以 4K 超高清格式录制，最高每秒 60 帧，而想要使用 10 位 HDR 的用户则只能以每秒 30 帧的速度拍摄。

主摄像头有三个镜头，其中主镜头和长焦镜头配备了光学防抖（OIS）功能。超广角镜头还可用作微距镜头。Pixel 10 Pro 的成像性能非常出色，均衡的图像构图和自然的色彩给人留下了深刻印象。不过，有时图像的深度会缺乏细节和活力，这让人不太满意。一加 13在湖泊场景中表现更好。在弱光环境下，景物的光线平衡很成功，但这是以牺牲部分细节为代价的，而且图像也会变得相当明亮。

超广角镜头的情况与此类似，它能很好地呈现深度，但同样牺牲了细节。外围区域也存在畸变。变焦时，Pixel 10 Pro 表现强劲，即使在 10 倍数码变焦时也能获得良好的效果。从 30 倍放大率开始，Pro Resolution Zoom（专业分辨率变焦）将被激活，它使用人工智能来分析和改进图像，类似于我们已经在 Honor Magic7 Pro或魔术 V5.只要图像中没有生物，效果就会相当不错，因为在这种情况下很快就会出现错误。人工智能在处理文字时也会出现问题。专业分辨率数码变焦最高可达 100 倍。

另一项新功能是 "相机教练"，旨在通过逐步指导，帮助您寻找新照片的灵感，并将所选主题发挥到极致。

使用视频增强功能可录制最高 8K 30 fps 的视频。所有镜头均可使用 10 位 HDR，最高可达 4k 30 fps。一般来说，用户可以在 24、30 和 60 fps 模式之间进行选择。拍摄时，在摄像机之间切换非常方便。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 在可控光线条件下显示出良好的成像性能。虽然我们的测试图表颜色较暗，但也能捕捉到很好的细节，即使在外围区域也能保持相对清晰。

在 ColorChecker 的色彩还原中，谷歌智能手机也没有显示出与 DeltaE 有任何重大偏差。

配件和保修：Pixel Care+ 仅在美国

不出所料，Pixel 10 Pro 的供货范围很小，只包括一条 USB-C 数据线和一个 SIM 卡弹出针。

德国提供的保修期为 24 个月，不能延长。Pixel Care+ 保险套餐只针对美国客户。

输入设备和操作：Pixel 手机中的超声波指纹识别器

谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的电容式触摸屏能够快速、可靠地响应输入。玻璃的滑动性能非常好。显示屏还配备了超声波指纹传感器，识别率高，解锁智能手机快速可靠。

也可通过前置摄像头解锁，但可靠性较差，尤其是在光线不足的情况下。

线性振动电机可提供清晰的触觉反馈，并可在设置中进行相对广泛的调整。按住电源键可启动 Gemini，按两次可打开相机或钱包。

显示屏Pixel 10 Pro 采用明亮的 LTPO OLED 显示屏

Pixel 10 Pro 配备 6.3 英寸 OLED 显示屏，是一款小巧的智能手机。不过，它的分辨率很高，显示效果也相应清晰。

由于采用了 LTPO 技术，刷新率可由系统在 1 Hz 和 120 Hz 之间动态调节。几乎完全支持 HDR 标准，但不包括杜比视界。

谷歌智能手机的亮度非常高。即使没有激活环境光传感器，在纯白色表面上也能达到 1,405 cd/m² 的亮度。

如果启动传感器，亮度会增加到约 2,200 cd/m²。如果使用减白表面 (APL18)，亮度可达到 3199 cd/m²，播放 HDR 视频时可达到 3207 cd/m²。


2179 cd/m²	2134 cd/m²	2259 cd/m²
2187 cd/m²	2161 cd/m²	2259 cd/m²
2198 cd/m²	2154 cd/m²	2255 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 2259 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 2198.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.71 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 2161 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 6646 K

	Google Pixel 10 Pro OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"	Samsung Galaxy S25 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.2"	Apple iPhone 16 Pro Super Retina XDR OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"	Xiaomi 15 OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"	Honor Magic7 Pro OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"
Screen		-125%	-49%	-71%	-32%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	2161	1301 -40%	1034 -52%	1021 -53%	1607 -26%
Brightness (cd/m²)	2198	1311 -40%	1034 -53%	1018 -54%	1609 -27%
Brightness Distribution (%)	94	98 4%	98 4%	98 4%	95 1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.7	3.1 -343%	0.98 -40%	1.3 -86%	0.9 -29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.8	4.4 -144%	2.76 -53%	2.9 -61%	1.8 -0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	0.8	2.3 -188%	1.6 -100%	2.2 -175%	1.7 -113%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.01 ^109%	2.17 ^101%	2.25 ^98%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	6646 ^98%	6454 ^101%	6638 ^98%	6658 ^98%	6346 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3199 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2594 cd/m² -19%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1634 cd/m² -49%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4697 cd/m² +46%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3207 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2766 cd/m² -14%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz
Amplitude: 17.24 %

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8224 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

与其他大多数采用 OLED 显示屏的智能手机一样，谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 也未能幸免 PWM 闪烁。与 Pixel 9 Pro 一样，它的工作频率相对较低，为 240 Hz（见上图）。虽然振幅非常平缓，但敏感用户在长时间使用时仍会出现问题。

在辅助功能设置中可以找到 "为敏感眼睛调整亮度 "选项。我们测量到的 PWM 频率为 480 赫兹。

在最低亮度下，该频率仍然保持在较低的 240 赫兹，只有在显示屏已经非常亮时才会增加到承诺的 480 赫兹。因此，该功能没有任何优势，尤其是在晚上和较暗的环境中。

测量系列具有固定变焦级别、激活的 480 Hz 功能和不同的亮度设置

在设置中选择 "自然 "色彩配置文件时，可实现最自然的显示色彩表现。

它提供了最佳的灰度、色彩校验和饱和度扫描值。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.505 ms rise
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5395 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.513 ms rise
1.31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.8015 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).

Pixel 10 Pro 在户外给人留下了非常好的印象。即使大猩猩玻璃显示屏反光较强，但即使在明亮的阳光下，内容依然清晰易读。

面板的视角稳定性也非常好。即使在非常平的视角下也不会出现色彩反转，只有亮度会明显下降。

性能张量 G5 落后于竞争对手

谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 搭载了自主研发的张量 G5并可使用相对宽裕的 16 GB 内存。

系统性能非常出色，无可挑剔，但基准测试表明其性能明显落后于大多数竞争对手。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192	3443 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3087 Points +34%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	3050 Points +32%
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	3001 Points +30%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	2308 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (2279 - 2308, n=2)	2294 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3785, n=201, last 2 years)	1692 Points -27%
Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288	1586 Points -31%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	9776 Points +55%
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	9202 Points +46%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	9019 Points +43%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192	8524 Points +35%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	6314 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (6108 - 6314, n=2)	6211 Points -2%
Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288	4938 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 10401, n=201, last 2 years)	4934 Points -22%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2677100 Points +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2474369 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1975467 Points +48%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192	1867306 Points +39%
Average Google Tensor G5 (1338955 - 1563512, n=2)	1451234 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=146, last 2 years)	1394452 Points +4%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1338955 Points
Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288	1205616 Points -10%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	20630 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	20623 Points +31%
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	19192 Points +22%
Average Google Tensor G5 (15738 - 16001, n=2)	15870 Points +1%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	15738 Points
Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288	14593 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=184, last 2 years)	14504 Points -8%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	13729 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	11876 Points +41%
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	11031 Points +31%
Average Google Tensor G5 (8446 - 9224, n=2)	8835 Points +5%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	8446 Points
Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288	8075 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14066, n=143, last 2 years)	7373 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192	Points -100%
System
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	19891 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17132 Points +33%
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	16439 Points +28%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	12881 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (12754 - 12881, n=2)	12818 Points 0%
Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288	12221 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=143, last 2 years)	11076 Points -14%
Memory
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	16961 Points +134%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	15541 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	14759 Points +103%
Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288	8750 Points +21%
Average Google Tensor G5 (7257 - 9558, n=2)	8408 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=143, last 2 years)	8361 Points +15%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	7257 Points
Graphics
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	51041 Points +70%
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	44189 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	33965 Points +13%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	30035 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (29704 - 30035, n=2)	29870 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=143, last 2 years)	24527 Points -18%
Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288	20494 Points -32%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2275 Points +25%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2252 Points +24%
Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288	1940 Points +7%
Average Google Tensor G5 (1813 - 1999, n=2)	1906 Points +5%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1813 Points
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=143, last 2 years)	1665 Points -8%
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1202 Points -34%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	21837 Points +24%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	20782 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=135, last 2 years)	19809 Points +12%
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	18154 Points +3%
Average Google Tensor G5 (17652 - 18101, n=2)	17877 Points +1%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	17652 Points
Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288	12951 Points -27%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192	33743 Points +2185%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=124, last 2 years)	27500 Points +1762%
Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288	2910 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1893 Points +28%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1796 Points +22%
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1790 Points +21%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1477 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (1271 - 1477, n=2)	1374 Points -7%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone (153 - 5210, n=32, last 2 years)	923 Points +93%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	478 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (472 - 478, n=2)	475 Points -1%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone (178 - 35890, n=32, last 2 years)	4260 Points +370%
Average Google Tensor G5 (907 - 1032, n=2)	970 Points +7%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	907 Points
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=32, last 2 years)	6160 Points +62%
Average Google Tensor G5 (3792 - 4393, n=2)	4093 Points +8%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	3792 Points

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=42, last 2 years)	904 Points +53%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	590 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (n=1)	590 Points 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	248 Points -58%
Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288	159 Points -73%
Score V6
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	12223 Points +1434%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	10742 Points +1248%
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 12845, n=64, last 2 years)	4130 Points +418%
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	991 Points +24%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	797 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (761 - 797, n=2)	779 Points -2%
Huawei Mate X6 HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288	421 Points -47%

Pixel 10 Pro 在图形性能方面也没有重大飞跃，仅比像素 9 Pro.集成 img dxt-48-1536不具备光线追踪功能。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6932 Points +114%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5933 Points +84%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5845 Points +81%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	3987 Points +23%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3232 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2605 Points -19%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2410 Points -25%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6854 Points +109%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5995 Points +83%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5800 Points +77%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	4628 Points +41%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3281 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2547 Points -22%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2422 Points -26%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	27327 Points +107%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24960 Points +89%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	23837 Points +81%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	17967 Points +36%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13193 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9476 Points -28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8922 Points -32%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2258 Points +123%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2248 Points +122%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	1647 Points +63%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1026 Points +1%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1013 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2362 Points +133%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2272 Points +124%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	1806 Points +78%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1014 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1001 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Points -100%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps -1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps -1%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps -1%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	58 fps -52%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	718 fps +77%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	711 fps +75%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	631 fps +55%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	518 fps +28%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	415 fps +2%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	406 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	348 fps -14%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps -1%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps -1%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps -1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	58.5 fps -52%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	502 fps +78%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	423 fps +50%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	368 fps +30%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	300 fps +6%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	282 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	245 fps -13%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	174 fps -38%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +1%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +1%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps -3%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	104 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	59.6 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	308 fps +49%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	294 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	268 fps +29%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	237.3 fps +15%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	207 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	165 fps -20%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps -46%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +103%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +103%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	114 fps +93%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps +20%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps +2%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -8%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	211 fps +160%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	192 fps +137%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	166 fps +105%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	154.7 fps +91%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	85 fps +5%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps -7%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +88%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	115 fps +80%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	102 fps +59%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	59.5 fps -7%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -27%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	118 fps +115%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	100 fps +82%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	90 fps +64%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	69.3 fps +26%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -20%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -33%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +28%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +28%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +28%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	94 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	91 fps -3%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps -18%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	59.8 fps -36%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	279 fps +120%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	274 fps +116%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	257 fps +102%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	176.1 fps +39%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	127 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -6%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps -23%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps +108%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	47 fps +88%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	44 fps +76%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	29.6 fps +18%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -20%
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps -36%

Pixel 10 Pro 浏览网页的速度非常快，但在基准测试中通常落后于竞争对手。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)	386.723 Points +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	284.674 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)	235.734 Points +22%
Average Google Tensor G5 (193.3 - 262, n=2)	227 Points +17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	193.311 Points
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)	191.986 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=148, last 2 years)	151.8 Points -21%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)	569 runs/min +65%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)	435 runs/min +26%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	419 runs/min +21%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	345 runs/min
Average Google Tensor G5 (343 - 345, n=2)	344 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)	342 runs/min -1%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 621, n=130, last 2 years)	206 runs/min -40%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)	33.5 runs/min +63%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)	29.9 runs/min +45%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	26.1 runs/min +27%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)	23.5 runs/min +14%
Average Google Tensor G5 (20.6 - 21.3, n=2)	21 runs/min +2%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	20.6 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 41.7, n=117, last 2 years)	13.9 runs/min -33%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)	267 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)	244 Points +38%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	196 Points +11%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	177 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (174 - 177, n=2)	175.5 Points -1%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)	168 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 302, n=143, last 2 years)	142.6 Points -19%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)	98997 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)	95809 Points +14%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	89248 Points +6%
Average Google Tensor G5 (84055 - 84281, n=2)	84168 Points 0%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	84055 Points
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)	78653 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 119218, n=196, last 2 years)	47252 Points -44%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (263 - 28190, n=151, last 2 years)	1219 ms * -158%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	472.5 ms *
Average Google Tensor G5 (470 - 473, n=2)	471 ms * -0%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)	454.4 ms * +4%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	429.4 ms * +9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)	389.3 ms * +18%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)	276.9 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

今年，谷歌继续使用 UFS 3.1 存储系统，不仅是 128 GB 版本，还有这里测试的 256 GB 版本。竞争对手的速度要快得多，因为他们使用 UFS 4.0 甚至 UFS 4.1 已经有一段时间了。

	Google Pixel 10 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S25	Xiaomi 15	Honor Magic7 Pro	Google Pixel 9 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		41%	92%	86%	-27%	75%	23%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	1492.74	3982.43 167%	3934.92 164%	3910.81 162%	1717.9 15%	3650 ?(1493 - 4384, n=47) 145%	2209 ?(270 - 4370, n=185, last 2 years) 48%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	1353.55	2256.71 67%	3889.06 187%	3683.81 172%	253.53 -81%	2695 ?(555 - 3484, n=47) 99%	1812 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=185, last 2 years) 34%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	264.44	299.89 13%	296.95 12%	282.34 7%	218.41 -17%	378 ?(218 - 483, n=47) 43%	294 ?(47.6 - 504, n=185, last 2 years) 11%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	347.84	51.76 -85%	360.36 4%	357.04 3%	261.55 -25%	391 ?(50.7 - 730, n=47) 12%	339 ?(9.4 - 964, n=185, last 2 years) -3%

游戏快速出汗

谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的 SoC 并不弱，但它肯定不适合游戏玩家。这首先是因为它不支持光线追踪，而且我们用GameBench 测试的帧率也不符合我们对高端智能手机的期望。测试，其帧率并不符合我们对高端智能手机的预期。

在《PUBG Mobile》中最多只能选择 HDR 设置，即使是较低的高清设置也只能达到 40 帧/秒。即使是最低画质模式，也无法以 60 帧/秒的速度持续运行。

在《源氏冲击》等要求较高的游戏中，我们可以看到帧率会随着时间的推移而下降，远远低于 60 fps 的目标值。在游戏过程中，智能手机还会发热。

Google Pixel 10 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø57.9 (36-61)

Google Pixel 10 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 6.0.0_36598533_36939763: Ø39.1 (27-61)

Google Pixel 10 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø53.3 (35-60)

Google Pixel 10 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.6 (12-42)

Google Pixel 10 Pro; Diablo Immortal: Ø56 (20-61)

排放物 - 配备 Auracast 的 Pixel 手机

温度

Pixel 10 Pro 的表面温度始终保持在安全范围内，即使在持续负载的情况下也不会超过 42 °C。

谷歌对 SoC 的散热做得很好，因为在压力测试中节流很小。

但即使是节流更高的骁龙 8 精英版，其产生的帧数也比谷歌手机多 40%。

Max. Load

Idle


40.9 °C	41.2 °C	38.7 °C
40.5 °C	41.1 °C	37.2 °C
40.8 °C	40.9 °C	36.3 °C

Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 39.7 °C


37.3 °C	38.1 °C	39.4 °C
36.4 °C	39.7 °C	39.4 °C
35.8 °C	38.4 °C	38.3 °C

Maximum: 39.7 °C
Average: 38.1 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	92.5 % +14%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.2 %
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66.3 % -18%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.6 % -29%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52.7 % -35%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88.7 %
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68.7 % -23%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	60.9 % -31%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	47.5 % -46%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	97.3 %
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69.5 % -29%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68.4 % -30%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	62.9 % -35%

Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø18 (17.1-19.3)

Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29 (26.2-38.2)

Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø64.8 (61.7-76)

Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø101.2 (87.7-132.2)

Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø70.9 (64.9-78.5)

Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø117.4 (98.5-139.4)

Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø7.49 (7.38-7.59)

Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.6)

扬声器

谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的双扬声器输出效果不错，但音量大时听起来有点刺耳。

谷歌在蓝牙音频编解码方面并不透明，不再允许读取编解码。

至少，Auracast 是板载的，音频信号也可以通过 USB 端口输出。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命：谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 电池容量为 4,870 毫安时

能源消耗

闲置时，谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的功耗应该会低一些。不过，在负载情况下，智能手机的耗电量会更高。

Pixel 既可以使用数据线充电，也可以不使用数据线充电。使用 Qi 2.2 无线充电功率可达 15 W，使用数据线充电功率可达 30 W。在测试中，使用数据线充满电需要 86 分钟（50%：28 分钟；80%：51 分钟）。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.15 / 0.23 Watt
Idle	1.01 / 1.65 / 2.05 Watt
Load	7.25 / 19.78 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Google Pixel 10 Pro 4870 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 4000 mAh	Apple iPhone 16 Pro 3582 mAh	Xiaomi 15 5400 mAh	Honor Magic7 Pro 5270 mAh	Average Google Tensor G5	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		14%	30%	32%	6%	10%	19%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.01	0.47 53%	0.4 60%	0.5 50%	0.94 7%	0.995 ?(0.98 - 1.01, n=2) 1%	0.854 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=152, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.65	1.04 37%	0.6 64%	1.11 33%	1.5 9%	1.495 ?(1.34 - 1.65, n=2) 9%	1.423 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=152, last 2 years) 14%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	2.05	1.07 48%	1 51%	1.13 45%	1.57 23%	1.775 ?(1.5 - 2.05, n=2) 13%	1.592 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=152, last 2 years) 22%
Load Average * (Watt)	7.25	13.33 -84%	11 -52%	8.91 -23%	11.03 -52%	5.82 ?(4.38 - 7.25, n=2) 20%	7.25 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=134, last 2 years) -0%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	19.78	16.38 17%	14.4 27%	9.3 53%	11.68 41%	18 ?(16.3 - 19.8, n=2) 9%	11.1 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=134, last 2 years) 44%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.37 (0.969-15.4)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.3 (0.661-16.4)

Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.865 (0.78-1.11)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.697 (0.648-0.956)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.2 (8.75-11.7)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.1 (9.13-16.2)

Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.865 (0.78-1.11)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.697 (0.648-0.956)

电池寿命

在测试中，电池的运行时间令人印象深刻，Pixel 10 Pro 的续航时间很长，甚至可以持续一整天。不过，从竞争对手的情况来看，更长的续航时间是有可能实现的，这通常需要使用更大的电池。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		33h 05min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 140)		21h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		23h 59min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 15min

	Google Pixel 10 Pro 4870 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 4000 mAh	Apple iPhone 16 Pro 3582 mAh	Xiaomi 15 5400 mAh	Honor Magic7 Pro 5270 mAh
Battery runtime		6%	16%	46%	20%
Reader / Idle (h)	33.1	45.2 37%	55.3 67%	62.7 89%	42.1 27%
H.264 (h)	24	26.5 10%	26.4 10%	29.7 24%	30.1 25%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	21.1	18 -15%	16.4 -22%	22.8 8%	24.7 17%
Load (h)	3.3	3 -9%	3.6 9%	5.4 64%	3.6 9%

Notebookcheck 对谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的总体印象

谷歌推出的 Pixel 10 Pro 是一款紧凑型旗舰智能手机，拥有出色的摄像头、足够的续航能力和七年的更新。不过，对于这个价格，我们更希望它能提供更多的原始性能。

Back to the verdict

Google Pixel 10 Pro - 09/30/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

69 / 69 → 100%

Weight

88%

Battery

92%

Display

93%

Games Performance

42 / 55 → 75%

Application Performance

74 / 85 → 87%

AI Performance

49%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

78 / 90 → 87%

Camera

86%

Average

82%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
84.7%

Materials
60%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
94.8%

Repairability
76%

Software Updates
100%

Total Sustainability Score: 85.9%

潜在竞争对手比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 88.9%	Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5 ⎘ IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: $1,099.00 List Price: 1199€	207 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.30" 2856x1280 497 PPI OLED
2. 88.9%	Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $7.58 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 2. $7.39 amFilm Auto-alignment OneTou... 3. $9.72 Ferilinso 3 Pack Privacy Scr... List Price: 899€	162 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.20" 2340x1080 416 PPI AMOLED
3. 87.9%	Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro ⎘ Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe	Amazon: 1. $39.99 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Silicone... 2. $39.99 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Sili... 3. $8.98 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1200 Euro	199 g	128 GB NVMe	6.30" 2622x1206 460 PPI Super Retina XDR OLED
4. 88.4%	Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind for Xiaomi 15 Ultra ... 2. $11.99 Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec... 3. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi 15 Screen... List Price: 760€	191 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.36" 2670x1200 460 PPI OLED
5. 89.2%	Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind for Honor Magic7 Pro... 2. $9.99 Anbzsign (2+2 Pack) for Hono... 3. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... List Price: 1300€	223 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.80" 2800x1280 453 PPI OLED

谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 智能手机评测：配备顶级摄像头的紧凑型 AI 怪兽

温和的进化

对谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的评价

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro

构建：Pixel 10 Pro 有四种颜色

尺寸比较

功能特点新增 Pixelsnap

软件：Pixel 10 Pro 的七年更新

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统：Wi-Fi 7 和双频全球导航卫星系统

手机功能和语音质量配备双卡双待的 Pixel 10 Pro

摄像头Pixel 10 Pro 强大的三摄像头

配件和保修：Pixel Care+ 仅在美国

输入设备和操作：Pixel 手机中的超声波指纹识别器

显示屏Pixel 10 Pro 采用明亮的 LTPO OLED 显示屏

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能张量 G5 落后于竞争对手

游戏快速出汗

排放物 - 配备 Auracast 的 Pixel 手机

温度

3DMark 压力测试

扬声器

Google Pixel 10 Pro audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S25 audio analysis

电池寿命：谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 电池容量为 4,870 毫安时

能源消耗

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 对谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro 的总体印象

潜在竞争对手比较

More articles related to this device

Transparency