Apple iPhone 17 Pro 评测 - 更快、更长、更远。这就够了吗？

Name: Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Brand: Apple

结构紧凑，功能强大。

iPhone 17 Pro 采用了全新的铝合金设计、更大的电池、速度更快的 A19 Pro 芯片和改进的摄像头。然而，在日常使用中，它的弱点就显现出来了：容易刮花的机身、Wi-Fi 和蓝牙连接问题，以及在负载情况下的发热问题，都给人留下了不好的印象。我们的评测将揭示是否值得升级。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/21/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Apple iOS iPhone Smartphone Touchscreen

结论 -Apple iPhone 17 Pro 评测

即使在创新方面没有任何真正的飞跃，iPhone 17 Pro 仍是前代产品的持续演进。AppleiPhone 17 Pro 在许多细节上进行了改进，包括采用了更明亮、色彩更准确的全新 OLED 显示屏。此外，它还配备了更大更持久的电池，A19 Pro 芯片与 12GB RAM 相结合，确保了出色的系统性能。摄像头也得到了改进，尤其是长焦镜头和前置摄像头，现在功能更多，技术更成熟。实际上，这款智能手机以其强大的性能和同类产品中最耐用的电池之一给人留下了深刻印象。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

不过，我们对它的印象好坏参半。从钛金属到铝金属的转变似乎是一种倒退，尤其是用户报告显示铝金属表面更容易划伤。虽然照片质量一流，但超广角功能依然薄弱，变焦传感器在弱光环境下也显得力不从心。显示屏虽然亮度很高，但仍然使用低频 PWM，这可能会让对此类问题敏感的用户感到烦恼。此外，还有一些小而恼人的限制，如不能通过蓝牙传输高分辨率音频、没有 Auracast，以及 iOS 26 的一些新功能在欧盟仍被封锁。

Pros

+ 高性能

+ 良好的摄像头设置

+ 出色的电池续航能力

+ USB 3.2、UWB 和 Wi-Fi 7

Cons

- 欧盟限制

- 没有高清蓝牙

- 保修期仅为 12 个月

价格和可用性

iPhone 17 Pro 的各种颜色和存储容量可直接从Apple以及所有主要零售商处购买。

结论 -Apple iPhone 17 Pro 评测
规格：Apple iPhone 17 Pro
外壳 - iPhone 17 Pro 现在采用铝质外壳
功能 - 您所希望的一切
软件 - iOS 26，版本飞跃，玻璃外观
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 仅在美国发送卫星信息
电话功能和语音质量 - iPhone 支持双 eSIM 卡
摄像头 - iPhone 17 Pro 的前置摄像头采用了全新的 Center Stage 摄像头
配件和保修 - 精简型包装盒
输入设备和操作 - iPhone 配备 Face ID
显示屏 - 更加明亮的 OLED 显示屏，现在还具有脉冲平滑功能
性能 - iPhone 17 Pro 配备 A19 Pro 和更多内存
游戏 - 以 120fps 的速度玩游戏易如反掌
排放 - iPhone 性能更稳定
电池运行时间 - 更大、更长、更精彩
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可能的替代品比较

iPhone 17 Pro 是去年 iPhone 16 Pro 的后继机型，现在至少配备 256 GB 的内部存储空间，起售价为 1099 美元。这款智能手机还提供 512 GB（1299 美元）和 1 TB（1499 美元）存储空间可供选择。

iPhone 17 Pro 的外观设计有了明显的调整，电池的体积大幅增大，并配备了新的变焦镜头和新的前置摄像头。充电速度也提高了，显示屏更亮了，当然，SoC 也升级了。请在下面的评测中了解您需要知道的一切。

规格：Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Apple iPhone 17 Pro (iPhone 17 Series)

Processor

Apple A19 Pro 6 x 2.6 - 4.3 GHz

Graphics adapter

Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.30 inch 19.5:9, 2622 x 1206 pixel 458 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, Super Retina XDR, OLED, ProMotion, Anti-reflective coating, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, Ceramic Shield 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

Apple 512GB NVMe, 512 GB

, 479.59 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, Face ID, OTG, Thread, UWB (Gen. 2)

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 66, 70, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 150 x 71.9

Battery

3988 mAh Lithium-Ion, (4252 mAh - eSIM only model), Battery Cycles: 1000

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Apple iOS 26

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 24 mm, 1/1.28", 1.22 µm) + 48 MPix (4x optical zoom, f/2.8, 100 mm, 1/2.55", 0.7 µm) + 48 MPix (f/2.2, 13 mm, 1/2.55", 0.7 µm)
Secondary Camera: 18 MPix (f/1.9, 20 mm, AF)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, SIM-Tool, USB-C-Cabel, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC | Dual-Band-GNSS: GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 602.78 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT, FAT32, exFAT, APFS, APFS (encrypted), macOS Extended (HFS+) | Body-SAR: 1.49 W/kg, Head-SAR: 1.49 W/kg | max. charging speed: 40 W (wired) / 25 W (wireless: MagSafe and Qi2), fanless, waterproof

Weight

206 g

Price

1549 Euro

Links

Apple homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 - iPhone 17 Pro 现在采用铝质外壳

在 iPhone Pro 上，钛金属已经成为历史，目前只有在 iPhone Air 上才能找到。取而代之的是，Apple ，iPhone Pro 采用了完全重新设计的铝合金边框，据称会更加耐用。然而，用户抱怨的问题正是所谓的 "划痕门"。尤其是摄像头凸起的硬质边缘被认为容易受到伤害。我们无法证实这一点，因为我们的评测设备至今没有任何划痕。

铝制边框被背面的玻璃表面打断。这个额外的设计元素不仅是为了美观，还有一个实用的目的，就是可以实现无线充电。摄像头凸起在视觉上非常突出，使智能手机的这一区域高度增加到 11.3 毫米。三个镜头额外突出 1.95 毫米，使 iPhone 17 Pro 的最大高度达到 13.25 毫米。我们测量到的最薄处为 8.55 毫米。

虽然仔细观察会发现背面嵌入式玻璃之间的缝隙并不完全平整，但其制造质量确实令人印象深刻。iPhone 手感非常舒适，SIM 卡插槽与同色边框齐平。

扭动 iPhone 时不会发出任何声音，感觉非常坚固。它还具有 IP68 级防尘防水功能。重量为 206 克，相对较重。可选颜色包括深蓝、宇宙橙和银色。

尺寸比较

Honor Magic7 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Google Pixel 10 Pro Xiaomi 15 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple iPhone 16 Pro DIN A6 ❌

功能 - 您所希望的一切

iPhone 17 Pro 功能全面：蓝牙 6.0、Wi-Fi 7、UWB、卫星通信、双 eSIM 卡、MagSafe 无线充电、Qi2 和 USB 3.2（Gen.2），其中 USB 3.2 在我们的测试中达到了很高的传输速度。在使用三星便携式固态硬盘 T7、Apple 对支持的文件系统也不挑剔，但 iPhone 无法识别 NTFS。有线视频输出可支持超高清和 HDR。

这听起来似乎天衣无缝，但蓝牙仍然缺乏用于高清音频的音频编解码器，而且 Auracast 支持尚未推出。操作按钮和相机按钮也集成了物理控制功能，这一点我们在前代产品中已经看到过。

软件 - iOS 26，版本飞跃，玻璃外观

Apple iPhone 17 Pro 预装了 iOS 26，包括Apple Intelligence 和新的 Liquid Glass 外观。不过，欧盟国家的用户仍面临一些限制，如 "已访问地点 "和 "iPhone 镜像 "等功能（目前）尚不可用。有关 IOS 26 的更多详情，请访问这里.

Apple 虽然苹果还没有就更新供应做出任何具体声明，但我们可以推测，更新期将至少覆盖五年，如果考虑到欧盟的新规定，则可能至少覆盖六年。

可持续性

iPhone 17 Pro 采用纤薄的无塑料外包装。Apple 在其可持续发展报告中提供了有关回收材料比例（总比例为 30%）、稀土和贵金属回收率等信息。此外，该公司还提供了自我维修计划，其中包括备件和说明。包括备件和说明。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 仅在美国发送卫星信息

iPhone 17 Pro 支持三个频段的 Wi-Fi 7。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配合使用，可实现高速稳定的数据传输，不过 6 GHz 频段的数据接收速度可能会更快一些。

华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 对移动网络的频段支持范围很广，可以在全球所有国家进行连接。在大城市环境中，连接特性良好，没有出现任何问题。总的来说，自从更新到 iOS 26.0.1 后，我们没有观察到通信模块出现任何连接问题。

与美国不同，德国的卫星通信仅限于紧急呼叫。这项服务究竟何时才能扩展到包括呼叫道路救援或通过卫星系统发送信息，目前还不确定。

Networking
Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	834 (min: 647) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	824 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1667 (min: 1563) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1216 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼68%
Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	928 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	916 (min: 903) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1571 MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1742 (min: 1566) MBit/s ∼97%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	622 (min: 487) MBit/s ∼34%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	921 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	969 (min: 436) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1387 (min: 1360) MBit/s ∼77%
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	876 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	871 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1386 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1793 (min: 1671) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor Magic7 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	981 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	829 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1884 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1569 (min: 1486) MBit/s ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼83%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1063 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1306 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1440 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	725 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	745 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1362 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1400 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼78%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1667 (1563-1686)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1720 (798-1853)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1215 (1179-1261)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1289-1530)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (647-963)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1806 (1767-1846)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (780-864)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1468 (744-1523)

双频全球导航卫星系统利用每个全球卫星网络提供定位服务。这通常可以确保快速准确的定位。

在一次自行车骑行中，我们将 iPhone 17 Pro 与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较，后者的路线跟踪非常好，只有一些小偏差。

电话功能和语音质量 - iPhone 支持双 eSIM 卡

iPhone 17 Pro 在德国仍配备 nano-SIM 卡，也可以使用 eSIM 卡。此外，还可以使用两个 eSIM 卡，并支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。

将Apple 智能手机贴在耳边时，通话质量很好，即使是较大的背景噪音也能被可靠地过滤掉。在免提模式下，用户听起来有点刺耳，但这一点很少会引起注意。

摄像头 - iPhone 17 Pro 的前置摄像头采用了全新的 Center Stage 摄像头

iPhone 17 Pro 的全新 Center Stage 前置摄像头经过了根本性的重新设计，现在配备了 1800 万像素传感器，具有 f/1.9 光圈和自动对焦功能。新的方形传感器可使相机在纵向和横向模式之间自动切换。中心舞台功能可确保人物始终是焦点，一旦有人移动或有其他人进入画面，相机就会动态变焦和移动图像。该相机还支持 4K HDR 视频录制，并改进了防抖功能和新的双捕捉模式，在该模式下，前置和后置摄像头可同时进行拍摄。

背面的主摄像头现在使用三个 4800 万像素传感器。这是一次重大升级，尤其是变焦方面，现在有 4 倍光学变焦（100 毫米），据说在 200 毫米时也几乎无损。还可实现 40 倍数码变焦（1049 毫米），并配备了带 3D 传感器偏移功能的光学图像稳定器。在日光下，变焦效果良好，但在弱光条件下，传感器面积较小的问题会很明显。

主摄像头在这方面也能拍出不错的照片。Apple ，由于传感器的裁剪，放大率几乎达到 2 倍。此外，还提供带传感器偏移功能（第二代）的光学防抖功能。这有助于 iPhone 17 Pro 拍摄出细节丰富、锐度均衡的图像，只有景深部分的细节有时会有些模糊。超广角镜头方面变化不大，仍可用作微距镜头。在全景拍摄中，景深并不特别深，锐度也明显向边缘下降。可提供 1,200 万、2,400 万（默认）和 4,800 万像素的分辨率，还可以使用 ProRAW。

只有主传感器可以使用杜比视界以 120fps 的超高清格式录制视频。如果希望使用所有三个镜头，则必须将帧速率降至 60fps。此外，还可使用未压缩的视频格式 ProRes（HDR 或 Log），但由于数据传输率较高，任何希望以超过 30fps 的速度使用该格式的用户都需要连接外部存储设备。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Ultra-wide angle 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在可控的照明条件下，我们的测试图几乎始终保持清晰，即使在边缘也几乎没有模糊。不过，在图像的中心，细节显得有些过度锐化，并出现了轻微的像差。

ColorChecker 图像效果非常好，没有任何颜色的 DeltaE 值超过 10。偏差最大（dE 9.9）的是青色，过于明亮。

配件和保修 - 精简型包装盒

iPhone 17 Pro 随附一条 USB 数据线（两侧均为 type-C）和一个 SIM 卡弹出工具。

德国的保修期仅为 12 个月，但零售商的保修期为零售商保修仍适用。通过Apple Care+，您还可以购买一个保险套餐，价格因保险范围而异。一次性支付 139.99 美元，保险期为一年，也可按月支付 13.99 美元。

输入设备和操作 - iPhone 配备 Face ID

在生物识别安全方面，通过 Face ID 实现了 3D 面部识别，具有高度的安全性、识别率和速度。触觉引擎再次负责触觉反馈，并提供清晰的反馈。

电容式触摸屏快速而精确。在背面也可以进行触控输入，但必须首先在设置中启用。Apple ，也没有改变在 iPhone 16 Pro 上看到的动作和相机按键的功能。 iPhone 16 Pro.

显示屏 - 更加明亮的 OLED 显示屏，现在还具有脉冲平滑功能

iPhone 17 Pro 的 OLED 显示屏尺寸为 6.3 英寸（16 厘米），由于采用了 LTPO 技术，它的刷新率可变，从 1 到 120 Hz 不等。支持所有常见的 HDR 标准，亮度绝对均匀。

与上一代产品相比，亮度进一步提高。在显示全白区域时，亮度保持不变，但在显示缩小的白色区域时，亮度会升至 3,044 cd/m²（APL18），而在显示 HDR 时，亮度会升至 2,997 cd/m²。如果希望手动调节亮度，则最大可调节至 849 cd/m²。

OLED 使用脉宽调制（PWM）来控制面板亮度。Apple 为保护眼睛，在无障碍设置中加入了 "脉冲平滑 "功能，相比之下，至少在显示屏亮度较低时，振幅更平缓。这是否足以保护敏感用户免受任何不适，可能要视具体情况而定。即使有这项功能，也不能完全排除这种情况。


1051 cd/m²	1059 cd/m²	1064 cd/m²
1057 cd/m²	1059 cd/m²	1066 cd/m²
1056 cd/m²	1063 cd/m²	1065 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Super Retina XDR tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1066 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1060 cd/m² Minimum: 1.07 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1059 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
CCT: 6542 K

	Apple iPhone 17 Pro OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"	Google Pixel 10 Pro OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"	Apple iPhone 16 Pro Super Retina XDR OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"	Xiaomi 15 OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"	Honor Magic7 Pro OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"
Screen		61%	11%	1%	33%	-21%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1059	2161 104%	1034 -2%	1021 -4%	1607 52%	1357 28%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1060	2198 107%	1034 -2%	1018 -4%	1609 52%	1350 27%
Brightness Distribution (%)	99	94 -5%	98 -1%	98 -1%	95 -4%	94 -5%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.3	0.7 46%	0.98 25%	1.3 -0%	0.9 31%	3.1 -138%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.6	1.8 50%	2.76 23%	2.9 19%	1.8 50%	4.7 -31%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.1	0.8 62%	1.6 24%	2.2 -5%	1.7 19%	2.2 -5%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.19 ^100%	2.17 ^101%	2.25 ^98%	2.24 ^98%	2 ^110%
CCT	6542 ^99%	6646 ^98%	6638 ^98%	6658 ^98%	6346 ^102%	6391 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3199 cd/m² +5%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	3044 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2613 cd/m² -14%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1634 cd/m² -46%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4697 cd/m² +57%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3207 cd/m² +7%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	2997 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2768 cd/m² -8%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz
Amplitude: 14.89 %
Secondary Frequency: 480 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8162 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这是由于缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

以固定变焦水平进行一系列测量，同时激活显示脉冲平滑和不同的亮度设置。

在色彩准确度方面，iPhone 17 Pro 在 Calman 测量中堪称典范，只有在关闭 "真实色调"（True Tone）后的浅灰阶中才会出现明显的绿色色调。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.476 ms rise
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.56 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.53 ms rise
1.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.602 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

在户外，iPhone 17 Pro 的亮度储备表现非常出色，但抗反射涂层几乎不明显，远不及 Galaxy S25 Ultra.

Apple 智能手机的可视角度稳定性非常好，即使在非常宽的可视角度下也不会出现明显的色彩倒置现象。最多亮度略有下降。

性能 - iPhone 17 Pro 配备 A19 Pro 和更多内存

iPhone 17 Pro 现在配备了 12GB LPDDR5x 内存，并由该公司自己的 Apple A19 ProSoC 芯片。

尤其是在 CPU 性能方面，尽管即将推出的顶级骁龙 8 精英 5 代智能手机将提供更高的多核性能。

iPhone 的系统和人工智能基准测试结果也非常出色，这意味着目前很难找到比它更快的设备了。

Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | AImark | Geekbench AI

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average Apple A19 Pro (3785 - 3888, n=3)	3825 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	3803 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192	3443 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3200 Points -16%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	3050 Points -20%
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	3001 Points -21%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	2308 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3803, n=203, last 2 years)	1699 Points -55%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	10097 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10020 Points -1%
Average Apple A19 Pro (9509 - 10105, n=3)	9904 Points -2%
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	9202 Points -9%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	9019 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192	8524 Points -16%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	6314 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=203, last 2 years)	4967 Points -51%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	2806319 Points
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2677100 Points -5%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2474369 Points -12%
Average Apple A19 Pro (2053750 - 2806319, n=2)	2430035 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2262067 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192	1867306 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=146, last 2 years)	1407660 Points -50%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1338955 Points -52%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	37423 Points
Average Apple A19 Pro (35571 - 37423, n=2)	36497 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192	33743 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=124, last 2 years)	27391 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1923 Points -95%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1796 Points -95%
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1790 Points -95%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1477 Points -96%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average Apple A19 Pro (5143 - 5210, n=2)	5177 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	5143 Points
Average of class Smartphone (153 - 5210, n=35, last 2 years)	901 Points -82%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	478 Points -91%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	35890 Points
Average Apple A19 Pro (35152 - 35890, n=2)	35521 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (178 - 35890, n=35, last 2 years)	4072 Points -89%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	907 Points -97%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	49889 Points
Average Apple A19 Pro (48126 - 49889, n=2)	49008 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=35, last 2 years)	5869 Points -88%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	3792 Points -92%

集成的 A19 Pro 的图形处理器还能提供高性能，并支持基于硬件的光线追踪。虽然基于 Adreno 830 的竞争对手在某些基准测试中取得了更好的成绩，但 iPhone 的定制系统使其在日常使用中更具优势，正如我们即将在游戏中看到的那样。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6907 Points +17%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5933 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	5928 Points
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5845 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	3987 Points -33%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3232 Points -45%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6845 Points +14%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	6001 Points
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5995 Points 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5800 Points -3%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	4628 Points -23%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3281 Points -45%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26614 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	26286 Points
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24960 Points -5%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	23837 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	17967 Points -32%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13193 Points -50%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12395 Points +8%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	11442 Points
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10764 Points -6%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10066 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	7750 Points -32%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12711 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	12194 Points
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11649 Points -4%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10634 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	8242 Points -32%

3DMark / Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	2109 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Extreme Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	2131 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	2630 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2397 Points -9%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2258 Points -14%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2248 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	1647 Points -37%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1013 Points -61%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	2698 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2651 Points -2%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2362 Points -12%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2272 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	1806 Points -33%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1014 Points -62%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +102%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	58 fps -3%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	754 fps
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	718 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	713 fps -5%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	631 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	518 fps -31%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	406 fps -46%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +102%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	58.5 fps -2%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	472 fps +14%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	423 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	415 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	368 fps -11%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	300 fps -28%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	282 fps -32%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +98%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	59.6 fps -1%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	308 fps +8%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	294 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	286 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	284 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	237.3 fps -17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	207 fps -28%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	114 fps +90%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	104 fps +73%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	59.9 fps 0%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps -2%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	210 fps
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	192 fps -9%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	166 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	161 fps -23%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	154.7 fps -26%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	115 fps +92%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	102 fps +70%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	100 fps +67%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps +7%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	59.5 fps -1%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps +23%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	100 fps +15%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	90 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	87 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	69.3 fps -20%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55 fps -37%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	94 fps +57%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	60 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	59.8 fps 0%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	274 fps +8%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	257 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	253 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	237 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	176.1 fps -30%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	127 fps -50%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps +41%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	47 fps +27%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	44 fps +19%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	37 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	29.6 fps -20%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25 fps -32%

在浏览网页时，iPhone 的性能仍然独占鳌头；无论是在日常使用还是在基准测试中，其性能都保持在较高水平。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)	386.723 Points +18%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)	329.095 Points
Average Apple A19 Pro (327 - 329, n=2)	328 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	315.056 Points -4%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	284.674 Points -13%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	193.311 Points -41%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)	191.986 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=149, last 2 years)	153.4 Points -53%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)	621 runs/min
Average Apple A19 Pro (598 - 621, n=2)	610 runs/min -2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)	569 runs/min -8%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	425 runs/min -32%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	419 runs/min -33%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	345 runs/min -44%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)	342 runs/min -45%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 621, n=130, last 2 years)	208 runs/min -67%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)	41.7 runs/min
Average Apple A19 Pro (40.7 - 41.7, n=2)	41.2 runs/min -1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)	33.5 runs/min -20%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	29.3 runs/min -30%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	26.1 runs/min -37%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)	23.5 runs/min -44%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	20.6 runs/min -51%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 41.7, n=119, last 2 years)	13.9 runs/min -67%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)	302 Points
Average Apple A19 Pro (297 - 302, n=2)	300 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)	267 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	236 Points -22%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	196 Points -35%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	177 Points -41%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)	168 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 302, n=143, last 2 years)	143.3 Points -53%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)	119218 Points
Average Apple A19 Pro (115463 - 119218, n=2)	117341 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	99202 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)	98997 Points -17%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	89248 Points -25%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	84055 Points -29%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)	78653 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 119218, n=196, last 2 years)	47376 Points -60%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (263 - 28190, n=151, last 2 years)	1212 ms * -348%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	472.5 ms * -75%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)	454.4 ms * -68%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	429.4 ms * -59%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	376.8 ms * -39%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro (Safari 18)	276.9 ms * -2%
Average Apple A19 Pro (270 - 280, n=2)	275 ms * -2%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)	270.4 ms *

* ... smaller is better

游戏 - 以 120fps 的速度玩游戏易如反掌

在 iPhone 17 Pro 上玩游戏总是很流畅，而这并不以发热为代价。使用GameBench进行的测试，游戏一般都运行得非常流畅，但也有轻微的掉帧现象，表现为轻微的卡顿。

使用过大尺寸手机的用户可能会觉得显示屏太小，而且动态岛会遮挡显示内容。

Apple iPhone 17 Pro; Call of Duty Mobile: Ø58.5 (45-60)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø116 (100-120)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø86 (59-112)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø116.6 (88-120)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø57.3 (45-59)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø38.4 (29-40)

排放 - iPhone 性能更稳定

温度

iPhone 17 Pro 的表面温度自始至终都很安全，只有在压力测试中偶尔会升至 40°C 以上。

这说明Apple 确实对散热系统进行了改进，在持续负载情况下性能节流现象明显减少。

Max. Load

Idle


39.8 °C	40.2 °C	38.7 °C
39.7 °C	39 °C	37.6 °C
37 °C	41.2 °C	37 °C

Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 38.9 °C


37.5 °C	39.9 °C	40.2 °C
37.8 °C	39.7 °C	40.8 °C
37.1 °C	39.9 °C	40.2 °C

Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 39.2 °C

Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	99.7 %
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	92.5 % -7%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.2 % -19%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66.3 % -34%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.6 % -42%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.9 % -45%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88.7 % +21%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	73.5 %
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68.7 % -7%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	60.9 % -17%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52.3 % -29%
Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	70.3 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	76.8 %
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66.9 % -13%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	65.6 % -15%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49.7 % -35%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	% -100%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	97.3 % +48%
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69.5 % +6%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68.4 % +4%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	65.8 %
Apple iPhone 16 Pro A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe	62.9 % -4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	50.6 % -23%

3DMark 压力测试

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (59.8-60)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø91 (76-138.4)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø29.2 (26.9-36.7)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (21.9-41.9)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø33.4 (31-40.3)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø26 (19.8-39.8)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability: Ø12 (10.8-15.4)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø15.4 (13.4-20.4)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.4 (10-19.8)

3DMark 无限压力测试

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø134.4 (125.6-160.3)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø122.8 (98.3-163.3)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø34.4 (31.5-41.8)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø27.5 (22.5-41.5)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø10.7 (9.04-15.3)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø15.5 (13.6-20.4)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.2 (10.9-18.7)

发言人

这两个扬声器的音质相对较好，即使在高音量下也不会失真。不过，正如预期的那样，声音略显缺乏层次感，不过这只有在音量较大时才会明显感觉到。

USB 端口可用于有线音频输出，蓝牙可用于无线音频输出。不过，蓝牙对编解码器的支持非常有限。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池运行时间 - 更大、更长、更精彩

耗电量

在最大显示亮度和负载情况下，iPhone 17 Pro 的功耗相当高。尤其是前者，需要注意的是，在手动模式下面板也会变得非常明亮。

Apple iPhone 17 Pro 的无线（最大 25W）和有线（最大 40W）充电速度都有所提高。使用原装电源适配器（65W），我们在 71 分钟后为 iPhone 充满电，21 分钟后达到 50%。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.13 / 0.34 Watt
Idle	0.56 / 1.78 / 1.89 Watt
Load	12.36 / 17.69 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Apple iPhone 17 Pro 3988 mAh	Google Pixel 10 Pro 4870 mAh	Apple iPhone 16 Pro 3582 mAh	Xiaomi 15 5400 mAh	Honor Magic7 Pro 5270 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh	Average Apple A19 Pro	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-10%	34%	33%	2%	21%	12%	12%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.56	1.01 -80%	0.4 29%	0.5 11%	0.94 -68%	0.55 2%	0.56 ?(0.52 - 0.6, n=3) -0%	0.854 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=161, last 2 years) -53%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.78	1.65 7%	0.6 66%	1.11 38%	1.5 16%	0.77 57%	1.677 ?(1.3 - 1.95, n=3) 6%	1.435 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years) 19%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.89	2.05 -8%	1 47%	1.13 40%	1.57 17%	0.91 52%	1.823 ?(1.6 - 1.98, n=3) 4%	1.609 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years) 15%
Load Average * (Watt)	12.36	7.25 41%	11 11%	8.91 28%	11.03 11%	13.81 -12%	7.92 ?(4.1 - 12.4, n=3) 36%	7.11 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=141, last 2 years) 42%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	17.69	19.78 -12%	14.4 19%	9.3 47%	11.68 34%	16.69 6%	15.1 ?(11.5 - 17.7, n=3) 15%	11.2 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=141, last 2 years) 37%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.24 (0.687-17.7)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.13 (0.4228-13.5)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.751 (0.7-0.902)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.615 (0.526-1.057)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.8 (11.3-15.7)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.6 (11.2-14.4)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.751 (0.7-0.902)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.615 (0.526-1.057)

电池寿命

在德国等仍支持实体 SIM 卡的国家，iPhone 17 Pro 的电池容量增至 3988 毫安时。在美国（仅限 eSIM 卡），腾出的空间也留给了电池，这意味着 17 Pro 的电池容量为 4252 毫安时。

不过，即使是较小的电池也能实现超长的续航时间。只有 Honor Magic7 Pro在视频播放方面略胜一筹。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		65h 51min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari Mobile 26.0.1)		24h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		46h 38min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 24min

	Apple iPhone 17 Pro 3988 mAh	Google Pixel 10 Pro 4870 mAh	Apple iPhone 16 Pro 3582 mAh	Xiaomi 15 5400 mAh	Honor Magic7 Pro 5270 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh
Battery runtime		-38%	-31%	-12%	-26%	-25%
Reader / Idle (h)	65.9	33.1 -50%	55.3 -16%	62.7 -5%	42.1 -36%	45.8 -31%
H.264 (h)	46.6	24 -48%	26.4 -43%	29.7 -36%	30.1 -35%	32.3 -31%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	24.2	21.1 -13%	16.4 -32%	22.8 -6%	24.7 2%	22.2 -8%
Load (h)	5.4	3.3 -39%	3.6 -33%	5.4 0%	3.6 -33%	3.7 -31%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

iPhone 17 Pro 是一款功能强大但价格昂贵的高端升级产品，它在显示屏、摄像头和电池方面表现出色，但从钛金属转为更易刮花的铝金属、缺乏高保真音频支持、欧盟地区的 iOS 功能有限、超广角较弱、PWM 闪烁以及一年保修期等问题却让人失望。

Back to the verdict

Apple iPhone 17 Pro - 10/17/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

71 / 69 → 100%

Weight

88%

Battery

94%

Display

92%

Games Performance

44 / 55 → 79%

Application Performance

95 / 85 → 100%

AI Performance

95%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

79 / 90 → 88%

Camera

87%

Average

84%

90%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
86.8%

Materials
65%

Packaging
95%

Power Use
94.5%

Repairability
76%

Software Updates
83.5%

Total Sustainability Score: 83.5%

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 89.9%	Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro ⎘ Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $37.99 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Silicone... 2. $8.98 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... 3. $6.98 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1549€	206 g	Apple 512GB NVMe	6.30" 2622x1206 458 PPI OLED
2. 88.9%	Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5 ⎘ IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: $1,099.00 List Price: 1199€	207 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.30" 2856x1280 497 PPI OLED
3. 87.9%	Apple iPhone 16 Pro Apple A18 Pro ⎘ Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe	Amazon: 1. $49.00 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Silicone... 2. $39.99 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Silicone... 3. $8.98 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1200 Euro	199 g	128 GB NVMe	6.30" 2622x1206 460 PPI Super Retina XDR OLED
4. 88.4%	Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi 15 Screen... 2. $11.99 Ibywind for Xiaomi 15 Ultra ... 3. $11.99 Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec... List Price: 760€	191 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.36" 2670x1200 460 PPI OLED
5. 89.2%	Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind for Honor Magic7 Pro... 2. $9.99 Anbzsign (2+2 Pack) for Hono... 3. $11.99 Charger for Honor Magic 7, 7... List Price: 1300€	223 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.80" 2800x1280 453 PPI OLED
6. 89.4%	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $7.57 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 2. $7.98 Ailun Glass Screen Protector... 3. $10.01 Milomdoi 3 Pack Privacy Scre... List Price: 1449€	218 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.90" 3120x1440 498 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X

Apple iPhone 17 Pro 评测 - 更快、更长、更远。这就够了吗？

结构紧凑，功能强大。

结论 -Apple iPhone 17 Pro 评测

Pros

Cons

价格和可用性

Table of Contents

规格：Apple iPhone 17 Pro

外壳 - iPhone 17 Pro 现在采用铝质外壳

尺寸比较

功能 - 您所希望的一切

软件 - iOS 26，版本飞跃，玻璃外观

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 仅在美国发送卫星信息

电话功能和语音质量 - iPhone 支持双 eSIM 卡

摄像头 - iPhone 17 Pro 的前置摄像头采用了全新的 Center Stage 摄像头

配件和保修 - 精简型包装盒

输入设备和操作 - iPhone 配备 Face ID

显示屏 - 更加明亮的 OLED 显示屏，现在还具有脉冲平滑功能

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - iPhone 17 Pro 配备 A19 Pro 和更多内存

游戏 - 以 120fps 的速度玩游戏易如反掌

排放 - iPhone 性能更稳定

温度

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark 无限压力测试

发言人

Apple iPhone 17 Pro audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

电池运行时间 - 更大、更长、更精彩

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可能的替代品比较

More articles related to this device

Transparency