Notebookcheck Logo

小米 14 Ultra 评测--徕卡手机的王牌之作

黄金标准? 小米的顶级产品已在全球发布,其目标是成为手机摄影的新参考。为此,小米 14 Ultra 依赖于四个高分辨率传感器和与徕卡的合作。我们的评测将揭晓这款手机的成功程度--以及它的其他部分是否也是高端产品。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米 14 Ultra 是小米 13 Ultra 的继任者。 13 Ultra.与前代产品相比,新机型似乎只进行了小幅更新,但现在可以在更大范围内购买。

据说它的 AMOLED 显示屏现在会变得更亮,其Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 正如预期的那样,是高通公司生产的速度最快的 SoC,而小米则是继Honor 之后第二家在手机电池上采用硅碳技术的制造商。不过,真正的亮点是其背面的四摄像头,这是与著名的德国徕卡公司合作开发的。它的主镜头采用了新的传感器,远摄镜头现在都可以微距拍摄。

小米手机的广告售价约为 1,600 美元。在这篇评测中,您可以发现它是否物有所值。

Xiaomi 14 Ultra (14 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.73 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 521 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, 240 Hz touch sampling rate, AMOLED, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, 1920 Hz PWM-Dimming, Xiaomi Shield Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 481.8 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Electronic compass, IR blaster, Barometer, Flicker sensor, OTG, X-axis linear vibration motor
Networking
Qualcomm FastConnect 7800 (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.2 x 161.4 x 75.3
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 90 W HyperCharge, 80 W wireless HyperCharge
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (1'' LYT-900-Sensor, 3.2 μm, 23 mm, f/1.63-f/4.0, 8P lens, OIS) + 50 MPix (3.2x Tele / Macro, f/1.8, 75 mm, IMX858, 6P lens, OIS) + 50 MPix (5x Periscope / Macro, f/2.5, 120 mm, IMX858, OIS) + 50 MPix (Ultra wide / Macro, f/1.8, 12 mm, IMX858, 7P lens); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (1/1.314", f/2.0, 90 °)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, 90W-Charger, USB-Cabel, SIM Eject Tool, Case, HyperOS 1.0, 24 Months Warranty, Body-SAR: 0.997 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.997 W/kg; GNSS: A-GPS, GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), NavIC (L5); Bluetooth Audio-Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LHDC V1-5, LDAC; HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision; IP68, fanless, waterproof
Weight
219.8 g
Price
1500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.2 %
04/2024
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
219.8 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440
91.1 %
12/2023
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU
221 g256 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
89 %
12/2023
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7
213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2992x1344
90.6 %
03/2024
Honor Magic6 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2800x1280
91.1 %
03/2024
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750
232 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"3120x1440
88.5 %
03/2024
Vivo X100 Pro
Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12
221 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2800x1260

在其网站上,小米在介绍 Ultra 时说它的外壳更薄。事实上,根据其规格,它的机身高度实际上已经从 9.06 毫米(约合 1.5 英寸)上升到 9.06 毫米(约合 1.5 英寸)。小米 13 Ultra)升至 9.2 毫米。这也许不算什么,但肯定不会更纤薄。我们甚至测量了 9.35 毫米,加上摄像头,它的厚度高达 15.9 毫米。值得一提的是,14 Ultra 不再头重脚轻。

小米 14 Ultra 有黑色和白色两种颜色。两个版本都采用了磨砂铝边框,不会留下指纹痕迹。背面由人造革制成,据称比前代产品更耐磨(准确地说,是前代产品的六倍)。显示屏玻璃四面均为圆形,由小米自己的 Shield 玻璃制成。据说这种玻璃的抗冲击性是 13 Ultra 的大猩猩玻璃 Victus 的十倍,而且手机还预装了屏幕保护膜。

它的材料给人留下了高品质的印象,其制造质量也确实不错。我们注意到没有任何缝隙,一切都完美地排列在一起。小米 14 Ultra 可以承受扭转而不发出声音。光学图像稳定器只有在手机摇晃时才会发出异常响亮的声音。不过,据小米公司称,这是正常现象。

这款智能手机通过了 IP68 认证;换句话说,它具有防尘和防水功能。

附带包装盒

尺寸比较

164.05 mm 75.28 mm 9.05 mm 221 g163.2 mm 74.6 mm 9.1 mm 227 g162.6 mm 76.5 mm 8.8 mm 213 g162.5 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 229 g162.3 mm 79 mm 8.6 mm 232 g161.4 mm 75.3 mm 9.2 mm 219.8 g159.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.25 mm 221 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 小米手机上的超快 USB 端口

小米 14 Ultra 继续配备红外传感器,可用于控制多媒体设备、空调等。此外还有蓝牙 5.4、NFC 和快速 USB 3.2(Gen 2)。

这款手机的 USB 端口不仅纸面速度快,而且在我们的复制测试中达到了 1,145.87 MB/s,这意味着它几乎充分发挥了这一标准的潜力。它还支持 USB-OTG,因此可以将外围设备和外部存储介质连接到智能手机上。后者可以用 FAT、FAT32、exFAT 或 NTFS 格式化。也可以进行有线图像输出,但智能手机的屏幕只是镜像。

小米 14 Ultra 仍然缺少 UWB。此外,它没有通过 microSD 扩展存储的选项,也没有专用的音频插孔。

首页: 扬声器
首页: 扬声器
左侧
左侧
右:音量摇杆、电源
右:音量摇杆、电源
底部:扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡
底部:扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡

软件 - HyperOS,五年更新一次

小米 14 Ultra 预装了基于Android 14 的 HyperOS 1.0。当然,它支持谷歌服务,从外观上看,该操作系统与 MIUI 几乎没有什么区别。它的一个优势是跨设备连接更好,系统更轻薄,该机型的系统大小为 9.74 GB。不过,如果算上额外的系统文件,其大小就会增加到相对宽松的 37.73 GB。

小米将在五年内为其旗舰智能手机提供四次重大更新和安全补丁。在测试时,最新的补丁是从 2024 年 3 月开始的,非常及时。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Wi-Fi 7 和精确定位服务

小米 14 Ultra 支持多种移动频率,但在全球使用方面仍有一些不足。所幸的是,这不会导致任何连接问题。在较大的城市,它的连接也很好。

小米智能手机支持三频无线局域网和 Wi-Fi 7,符合所有现代标准。与我们的参考路由器(华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 (Wi-Fi 6E))一起使用时,我们注意到传输速率很高,而且基本稳定。不过,它发送数据的速度似乎快于接收数据的速度。

我们使用 TP-Link Archer BE800 测试了它的 Wi-Fi 7 功能。三个频段都能识别现代网络,没有任何问题。5 GHz 网络受益于现代标准,数据传输率很高(发送:1,515 MBit/s / 接收:1,515 MBit/s / 发送:1,515 MBit/s / 接收:1,515 MBit/s1,515 MBit/s / 接收:1,510 MBit/s(平均值)),但在 6 GHz 网络中,小米 14 Ultra 的表现显然没有达到预期。它只能达到 693 MBit/s(发送)和 834 MBit/s(接收)。相比之下 vivo X100 Pro在同样的情况下(发送时的峰值)可达到 3.7 Gbit/s。小米在这方面仍有改进的空间。

Networking
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
797 (min: 400) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
928 (min: 642) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1814 (min: 939) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1495 (min: 1227) MBit/s ∼81%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
931 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1345 (min: 1298) MBit/s ∼73%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼80%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
806 (min: 404) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
904 (min: 308) MBit/s ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
801 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
556 (min: 253) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1553 (min: 815) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1461 (min: 1284) MBit/s ∼79%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
929 (min: 862) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
915 (min: 772) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1822 (min: 1665) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1838 (min: 1798) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
917 (min: 882) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1002 (min: 985) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1789 (min: 1557) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1579 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
649 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
686 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1537 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1360 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼74%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1782 (939-1885)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1469 (1069-1581)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1227-1540)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1467 (1304-1676)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø783 (400-815)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø896 (870-916)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø928 (642-987)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (333-944)
GPS 测试:室内
室内
GPS 测试:室外

小米 14 Ultra 使用除日本 QZSS 以外的所有卫星导航服务进行定位。它使用最常见的频段,甚至能在室内快速、准确地定位。

我们带着 Ultra 和Garmin Venu 2 一起骑车旅行,进行比较。智能手机毫无惧色,因为它记录的路线甚至比健身智能手表更精确。

全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:总结
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:总结

电话功能和通话质量 - 不支持 eSIM

小米 14 Ultra 支持 WLAN 通话和 VoLTE 等电话功能,但不支持 eSIM 卡。相反,它使用两张 nano SIM 卡提供传统的双 SIM 卡操作。手机使用谷歌电话应用程序。

将手机贴在耳边时,小米手机的通话质量非常好,在安静的环境中语音传输自然流畅。如果周围的环境噪声很大,那么用户的声音听起来可能会有些受限,偶尔还能听到背景噪音。它的扬声器模式也不错,即使在两米远的地方也有很好的清晰度,但听起来略显尖锐,而且声音较小。

相机 - 配备徕卡四摄像头的小米 14 Ultra

小米 14 Ultra 上的自拍照
小米 14 Ultra 上的自拍照

小米 14 Ultra 的前置摄像头没有太大变化。它的分辨率仍然是 3200 万像素,而且没有使用像素二进制,这也是其照片文件大小相对较大的原因。它没有自动对焦功能。尽管如此,使用该镜头拍摄的照片看起来还是相当不错的,即使在光线较暗的日子里也是如此。视频可以用超高清格式录制,最高可达 60fps。如果使用杜比视界(Dolby Vision)录制,最高可达 4k/30fps。

小米 14 Ultra 的亮点在于其背面的四摄像头。其主传感器为 1 英寸索尼 LYT-900。它的像素边长为 1.6 微米,通过像素分档组合成 3.2 微米的超级像素。因此,图像大小不是 5000 万像素,而是 1250 万像素。不过,也可以选择 5000 万像素模式。除了光学防抖(OIS)外,该相机还具有抗反射涂层(ALD:Anti-Reflective Coating)。您还可以将光圈从 f/1.63 调整到 f/4.0。使用该镜头拍摄的照片细节清晰,背景锐度也很稳定。但在近距离拍摄时,图像会变得非常暗,对比度也非常明显。14 Ultra 在弱光条件下也能拍摄出不错的照片,但仔细观察,会发现一些细节丢失,有时还会出现一些模糊的斑点。

其他镜头再次依赖索尼 IMX858。与的前身一样, ,它的超广角镜头可用于微距拍摄(最小距离:5 厘米)。在日光下,该镜头可提供良好的拍摄效果,但遗憾的是边缘锐度有所下降。

另外两个镜头是光学放大镜头,都配备了 OIS。其中一个镜头的变焦倍数为 3.2 倍,而潜望镜镜头的变焦倍数为 5 倍。这两个镜头还可用作远摄微距镜头,使用时的最小距离分别为 10 厘米和 30 厘米。数码变焦可达 120 倍。其描绘质量相当不错,放大 10 倍(240 毫米)以内的效果都是可用的。超过这个倍率,质量就会差很多。从 20 倍放大率开始,数字取景器开始工作,但其校准并不准确。因此,微型取景器中显示的图像部分在较大的实时取景器中总是略微偏右。在长焦距拍摄时,图像稳定功能的弱点也会变得很明显,因为此时图像会明显模糊,有时还会出现抖动。

小米 14 Ultra 可以录制当前所有分辨率的视频,虽然也可以使用杜比视界(Dolby Vision)进行录制,但仅限于超高清和最高 30fps 的速度。不过,就质量而言,这款智能手机令人印象深刻,而且还提供了通过专业模式以 LOG 格式录制的选项。

如果您想选择 16:9 以外的宽高比,请注意所谓的宽屏格式仅在顶部和底部添加黑条。即使是 21:9 也只能显示一部分,因为全高清视频的分辨率只有 1,920 x 800 像素。

23 毫米(光学)
46 毫米(数字)
75 毫米(光学)
120 毫米(光学)
240 毫米(数字)
480 毫米(数字)
1200 毫米(数字)
2880 毫米(数字)
模式 高宽比 分辨率
照片 全屏、1:1、16:9、4:3、21:9 12.5 MPix
50 MP 4:3 50 MPix
专业版(照片) 全屏、1:1、16:9、4:3 12.5 / 50 MPix
视频 宽屏、16:9 高清(30 FPS)、全高清(30/60 FPS)、超高清(24/30/60/120 FPS)、8k(24/30 FPS)
电影 宽屏,16:9,2.39:1 全高清(24 FPS)
专业(视频) 16:9,宽屏 高清 (30 FPS)、全高清 (30/60 FPS)、超高清 (24/30/60/120 FPS)、8k (24/30 FPS)
慢动作 16:9 高清 (120/240/480/960/1920 FPS)
全高清 (120/240/480/960/1920 FPS)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light
click to load images

在可控光照条件下,小米 14 Ultra 的画质非常出色。我们拍摄的测试图细节丰富、锐度极高,拍摄后也没有过度锐化。只有边缘部分的锐度略有下降(但并不令人讨厌)。

用户可以对色彩描绘施加影响。您有两种模式可供选择,即Leica Vibrant Leica Authentic。 前者使色彩描绘更加生动,但在描绘 ColorChecker 图表时,DeltaE 偏差会大大增加。

徕卡的合作还延伸到了相机的视觉设计,包括多种摄影滤镜。

ColorChecker
12.4 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
12 ∆E
9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 14 Ultra: 8.82 ∆E min: 2.36 - max: 16.76 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
14 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
13 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
13 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 14 Ultra: 12.89 ∆E min: 5.38 - max: 20.76 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括 90 瓦电源

小米 14 Ultra 随附一个 90 瓦模块化电源、一条 USB 数据线(Type-A 转 Type-C)、一个 SIM 卡工具和一个保护套。后者由简单的黑色塑料制成,感觉有点廉价。

您可以选择购买所谓的摄影套件。该套件包括一个质量更高的保护套、一个带腕带的相机手柄、一个滤镜转接环(67 毫米)以及两个装饰环。手柄上有一个两段式快门释放装置、一个变焦杆、一个录制按钮和一个旋转拨盘。这些按钮可以通过手机设置分配不同的选项,但默认情况下,它们控制的是变焦、开始/停止视频录制或调整曝光等经典功能。此外,它还配备了一块 1,500 毫安时电池,可为小米手机提供额外的电力。无论是装饰环还是滤镜转接环,都可以连接到保护壳的镜头环上。该套件将小米 14 Ultra 变为更小巧的相机,在旅行中,这肯定会带来一些附加价值--尽管它确实会让手机变得更笨重一些。它的价格约为 200 美元,也并不便宜。

在美国,小米为其智能手机提供 12 个月的标准保修,但不能延长或扩大保修期。

配备摄影套件的小米 14 Ultra:橙色装饰环
小米 14 Ultra 配备摄影套件:67 毫米滤镜适配器
小米 14 Ultra 配备摄影套件:67 毫米滤镜适配器(朝下)
配备摄影套件的小米 14 Ultra:取出的手机

输入设备与操作 - 小米 14 Ultra 配备光学指纹传感器

小米 14 Ultra 的电容式触摸屏具有 240 Hz 的触摸采样率,能快速可靠地执行输入。线性振动电机(X 轴)可提供触觉反馈,工作时噪音很小,但仍然足够强劲。

安装在手机显示屏上的光学指纹传感器负责生物识别安全,它具有很高的识别率和不错的解锁速度。在光线充足的条件下,通过前置摄像头进行面部识别会更快一些,但安全性较低。指纹传感器还可用于测量脉搏。

如果需要,还可以激活单手模式。此外,电源键还可以通过手机设置分配附加功能。此外,背面还有一个触摸感应表面,可以对双击或三击做出反应,从而激活先前确定的功能,例如打开相机应用。您必须用力按压,但当智能手机在保护套内时也能正常工作。

显示屏 - 小米 14 Ultra 显示屏亮度超过 3,000 cd/m²

RGGB 子像素阵列
RGGB 子像素阵列

小米 14 Ultra 的 LTPO AMOLED 显示屏对角线为 6.73 英寸(17.09 厘米),分辨率为 1440p,刷新率为 1 至 120 Hz。此外,它还支持包括杜比视界(Dolby Vision)在内的所有传统 HDR 标准。

在激活环境光传感器的情况下,当显示完全白色的屏幕时,亮度可能会相当高,但对于高端手机来说,亮度相对较低。当描绘亮度和暗度均匀的区域时(APL18),图像中间的亮度可达 1,400 cd/m²,而在播放 YouTube 上的 HDR 视频时,我们甚至注意到亮度高达 3,274 cd/m²。

遗憾的是,小米 14 Ultra 也未能幸免 OLED 闪烁的问题。为了解决这个问题,小米采用了高达 1,920 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光技术。但在最低亮度下,我们测得的频率为 120 Hz。虽然频率很低,但平缓而均匀的振幅曲线使其对眼睛的压力比频率所显示的要小。这并不是由于时间抖动造成的,我们无法检测到这种抖动,而是手机可能使用了黑框插入(BFI)技术,该技术用于减少运动模糊和保护眼睛。在固定变焦级别的测量系列中,最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来相当平缓,但这是由于缩放造成的;最低亮度下的振幅放大图可以在信息框中看到。

总的来说,小米 14 Ultra 的显示屏还是比较容易上眼的,但我们也不能完全排除敏感用户使用时可能会出现的问题。

983
cd/m²
993
cd/m²
1014
cd/m²
1009
cd/m²
997
cd/m²
1014
cd/m²
1003
cd/m²
987
cd/m²
1019
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1019 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1002.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.27 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 997 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
OLED, 2796x1290, 6.70
Google Pixel 8 Pro
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.70
Honor Magic6 Pro
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.80
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.80
Vivo X100 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.78
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Screen
12%
19%
7%
-26%
40%
17%
Brightness middle
997
1102
11%
1510
51%
1575
58%
1317
32%
1392
40%
1357
36%
Brightness
1002
1102
10%
1467
46%
1508
50%
1365
36%
1360
36%
1340
34%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
92
-4%
89
-7%
94
-2%
84
-12%
89
-7%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
1.1
31%
1.1
31%
1.7
-6%
3.4
-113%
0.6
62%
1.1
31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.3
3.1
6%
3.8
-15%
3.9
-18%
5
-52%
1.3
61%
2.7
18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
1.6
11%
1.7
6%
2.4
-33%
2.8
-56%
0.9
50%
2
-11%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.19 100%
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
2 110%
2.25 98%
2.2 100%
CCT
6493 100%
6555 99%
6670 97%
6398 102%
6458 101%
6540 99%
6366 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17853 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

我们非常喜欢面板的色彩描绘。如果你想获得最自然的效果,那么你必须在显示设置中选择色彩方案选项,然后点击高级设置,最后选择原始色彩空间。之后,灰色色调不会出现任何明显的偏差,我们只注意到蓝色色调的 DeltaE 略有升高,但这只是最高级别的抱怨。

在使用手机的标准设置时,屏幕的显示效果更冷,色彩饱和度更高。

灰度(模式:高级/原始,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(模式:高级/原始,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(模式:高级/原始,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(模式:高级/原始,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(模式:高级/原始,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(模式:高级/原始,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(模式:高级/原始,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(模式:高级/原始,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.711 ms rise
↘ 0.5535 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.776 ms rise
↘ 0.773 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在室外,小米 14 Ultra 的屏幕基本保持清晰可读,因为它有足够的亮度储备。如果有的话,显示屏表面的一些反光可能会有点碍眼。

小米 14 Ultra 外景(阴天)
小米 14 Ultra 外景(阴天)

我们非常喜欢 OLED 显示屏的视角稳定性。在平视角度下,它的亮度可能会有所下降,显示效果也会明显变冷,但这在日常使用中不会有任何影响。

小米 14 Ultra 的视角稳定性
小米 14 Ultra 的视角稳定性

性能 - 高通 SoC 带来强劲动力

不出所料,小米 14 Ultra 依赖于高通公司目前最强大的 SoC:骁龙 8 代 3 骁龙 8 代 3.它拥有令人印象深刻的 16 GB LPDDR5x RAM。

在基准测试中,该芯片组达到了我们预期的结果--只是在人工智能计算方面表现稍差,没有发挥出 SoC 的全部潜能。

其系统速度很高。虽然这不足以让这款手机在基准测试中获得第一名,但它在日常使用中仍能流畅运行。

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2930 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points +1%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2254 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (2127 - 2329, n=12)
2238 Points -1%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
2207 Points -2%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2127 Points -6%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1769 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=108, last 2 years)
1372 Points -39%
Multi-Core
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
7408 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7244 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (6432 - 7501, n=12)
6991 Points +1%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6933 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6765 Points -2%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4538 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=108, last 2 years)
3793 Points -45%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1716 Points +1%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1695 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1575 - 1702, n=10)
1672 Points -1%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1654 Points -2%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
1604 Points -5%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1498 Points -12%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1274 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)
913 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
6681 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6426 Points +3%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6252 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6157 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5393 - 6543, n=10)
6103 Points -2%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5232 Points -16%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3624 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)
2997 Points -52%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2050639 Points +3%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
2038807 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1624507 - 2162423, n=11)
2005548 Points +1%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1987321 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1837994 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1487075 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281399 - 2162423, n=52, last 2 years)
1240541 Points -38%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1113506 Points -44%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18672 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (15343 - 21628, n=11)
18565 Points +8%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18155 Points +5%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
17260 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15411 Points -11%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
14573 Points -16%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
11824 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)
11807 Points -32%
CrossMark - Overall
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1474 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1443 Points +16%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1408 Points +14%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
1301 Points +5%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1242 Points 0%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1239 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1043 - 1474, n=8)
1227 Points -1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
935 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=164, last 2 years)
842 Points -32%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
11438 Points +5%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10871 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10480 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8165 - 10966, n=9)
10135 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9696 Points -11%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
9563 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=164, last 2 years)
5798 Points -47%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
16475 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15843 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14961 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8611 - 15935, n=9)
14075 Points -11%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
13765 Points -13%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
12477 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=164, last 2 years)
9727 Points -39%
Memory
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
12716 Points
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
11309 Points -11%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11039 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8937 - 12716, n=9)
11005 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
10389 Points -18%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10363 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=164, last 2 years)
6310 Points -50%
Graphics
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
58651 Points +77%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
35448 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (29938 - 38586, n=9)
34206 Points +3%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
33187 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
29678 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
27905 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=164, last 2 years)
14354 Points -57%
Web
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2089 Points
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
2068 Points -1%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2060 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1661 - 2145, n=9)
2009 Points -4%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1998 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1815 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=164, last 2 years)
1500 Points -28%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
66541 Points +355%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
27018 Points +85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=149, last 2 years)
21932 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18852 Points +29%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18147 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (13873 - 18370, n=10)
16833 Points +15%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15683 Points +7%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
14617 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
245629 Points +16374%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1381 - 245629, n=9)
108185 Points +7156%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
49660 Points +3231%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
29087 Points +1851%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points +1096%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1518 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1491 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1298 Points -13%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1109 Points -26%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
3410 Points +802%
Average of class Smartphone
  (378 - 3410, n=8, last 2 years)
894 Points +137%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
678 Points +79%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
663 Points +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (378 - 663, n=4)
511 Points +35%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
378 Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1478 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1070 - 1478, n=4)
1264 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1254 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (978 - 1478, n=8, last 2 years)
1185 Points +11%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1070 Points
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
978 Points -9%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1317 Points +12%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1292 Points +9%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
1247 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1141 - 1342, n=4)
1239 Points +5%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1180 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (509 - 1342, n=8, last 2 years)
1129 Points -4%

集成的 Adreno 750在图形基准测试中也有类似的表现。它提供的性能可能很高,但往往略逊于配备相同芯片组的竞争对手,尤其是在使用更现代的 Vulkan API 时。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5248 Points +12%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5167 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4804 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4690 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3879 Points -17%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3712 Points -21%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points -49%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5177 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5040 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4937 Points
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4817 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3765 Points -24%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3763 Points -24%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20068 Points +20%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19545 Points +17%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17613 Points +6%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16691 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
15260 Points -9%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13995 Points -16%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points -47%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8677 Points +15%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7845 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7523 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7510 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6478 Points -14%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8679 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8620 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8289 Points
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7975 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6106 Points -26%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7922 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7451 Points +50%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6883 Points +39%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6411 Points +29%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5044 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4968 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29081 Points +1%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28887 Points
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25785 Points -11%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25076 Points -13%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24304 Points -16%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13743 Points -52%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17677 Points +27%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17516 Points +26%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15555 Points +11%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15192 Points +9%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13956 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9935 Points -29%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
791 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
549 fps +4%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
544 fps +3%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
529 fps
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
489 fps -8%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
444 fps -16%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps -34%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
339 fps +3%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
328 fps
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
327 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
319 fps -3%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
277 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
262 fps -20%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +3%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -2%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps -8%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps +4%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
251 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
250 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps -1%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
223 fps -11%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
180 fps -28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps +25%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps +2%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -12%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps -21%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -26%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
162 fps +4%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
148 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps -9%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
128 fps -18%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
110 fps -29%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -52%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps +53%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps +20%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +5%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
55 fps -8%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -15%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps +14%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps +5%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps -10%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
61 fps -23%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -53%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +15%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps +10%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps -12%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps -19%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
228 fps +19%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
198 fps +3%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
192 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps -3%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps -19%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
117 fps -39%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -49%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps +8%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37 fps
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps -11%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
25 fps -32%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -57%

使用小米 14 Ultra 上网的速度可以接受。它在基准测试中排名中游。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
254.048 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
209.919 Points +44%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
173.403 Points +19%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)
162.122 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.2 - 241, n=13)
158.3 Points +8%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
146.13 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
117.078 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years)
107 Points -27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
105.175 Points -28%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
445 runs/min +102%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
265 runs/min +20%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
234 runs/min +6%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
220 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.6 - 311, n=11)
191.6 runs/min -13%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
158 runs/min -28%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)
151 runs/min -31%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
134 runs/min -39%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=156, last 2 years)
108.3 runs/min -51%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
11 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4.3 - 11.9, n=5)
9.32 runs/min -15%
Average of class Smartphone (3.33 - 11.9, n=16, last 2 years)
7.02 runs/min -36%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
4.3 runs/min -61%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
195 Points +25%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
183 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (112 - 196, n=10)
158.8 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
156 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)
139 Points -11%
Honor Magic6 Pro
112 Points -28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
103 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=161, last 2 years)
100.2 Points -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
86270 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
72011 Points +19%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
66656 Points +10%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
60574 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)
60432 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 70135, n=11)
54354 Points -10%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
49506 Points -18%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
37221 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=215, last 2 years)
33395 Points -45%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)
1551 ms * -125%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
1153.9 ms * -68%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
840.2 ms * -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (624 - 1154, n=11)
800 ms * -16%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
698.2 ms * -1%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
688 ms *
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)
657.6 ms * +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
599 ms * +13%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
388.3 ms * +44%

* ... smaller is better

小米 14 Ultra 的 UFS 4.0 存储速度让我们无可挑剔。虽然不少竞争对手的速度有时更快,但在日常使用中你不会注意到这一点。

Xiaomi 14 UltraGoogle Pixel 8 ProHonor Magic6 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 UltraVivo X100 ProXiaomi 13 UltraAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-66%
15%
-24%
17%
2%
1%
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
4102.56
1501.13
-63%
3923.31
-4%
3610.25
-12%
3986.41
-3%
4511.82
10%
3712 ?(2451 - 4512, n=19)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
3095.36
257.28
-92%
3678.35
19%
1893.63
-39%
3461.77
12%
2878.39
-7%
Random Read 4KB
362.88
156.16
-57%
415.68
15%
437.12
20%
450.24
24%
398.87
10%
Random Write 4KB
527.15
258.92
-51%
678.39
29%
181.55
-66%
709.25
35%
507.27
-4%

游戏 - 小米 14 Ultra 的强力游戏

我们使用GameBench 测试了小米手机的游戏性能。和一些精选游戏进行了测试。不出所料,由于 Adreno 750 确保了流畅的性能,我们没有太多可抱怨的。不过,在玩《暗黑破坏神不朽》时,你无法选择最精细的超图形设置。

除此之外,这款小米智能手机还拥有可靠的触摸屏、悦耳的扬声器和集成的 Game Turbo(游戏加速)功能,可让用户使用多项附加功能,给人留下了深刻印象。

暗黑破坏神不朽
暗黑破坏神不朽
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
游戏涡轮
游戏涡轮
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Xiaomi 14 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.1.0: Ø89 (70-91)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.1.0: Ø59.3 (41-61)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.1.0: Ø39.9 (39-41)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra; Diablo Immortal; 2.3.0: Ø59.8 (57-61)

排放 - Ultra 在压力测试中留下了印记

温度

在负载情况下,我们注意到小米 14 Ultra 的表面温度有时超过 44 °C。虽然温度很高,但并不严重。在测试过程中,我们注意到智能手机的散热系统在较长时间内无法控制 Burnout 基准,这就是为什么我们不得不在一定程度上调整场景--否则应用程序就会关闭。

不过,在 3DMark 压力测试中,与其他使用骁龙 8 代 3 的智能手机相比,Ultra 的性能相当稳定。尽管如此,性能还是有所下降。

Max. Load
 43.6 °C42.5 °C40.9 °C 
 43.9 °C44.2 °C42.1 °C 
 43.7 °C42.8 °C41.2 °C 
Maximum: 44.2 °C
Average: 42.8 °C
37 °C40.9 °C39.6 °C
40.4 °C41.1 °C39.4 °C
40.3 °C40.9 °C39.5 °C
Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 39.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
78.9 % +23%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 % +22%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64.4 %
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.2 % -19%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.7 % -27%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.1 % -28%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % +1%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 %
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.4 % -13%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.3 % -21%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.4 % -25%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.1 % -36%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.1 %
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
66.1 % -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.9 % -25%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47.8 % -34%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38.4 % -47%
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.2 (21.8-28.9)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø17.1 (16.4-25)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø81.6 (68.3-106.1)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø52.8 (47.3-60)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø98.8 (92.4-116.6)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø62.8 (55.9-93.3)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23.5 (20.9-29.2)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø15.4 (14.1-17.8)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23.1 (20.7-28.7)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø15.5 (14.1-21.3)

发言人

小米 14 Ultra 的两个扬声器绝对是同类产品中的佼佼者,在中等音量下可以发出不错的声音,甚至还能听到一点低音。不过,在大音量时,高音尤其过于突出,导致声音有些尖锐。

USB-C 支持有线声音输出,蓝牙 5.4 支持无线输出。其编解码器支持相当广泛,但缺少 LC3。小米智能手机还不支持 Auracast。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.3352526.228.23125.932.24029.235.25035.6396325.934.58022.135.510017.836.712517.142.716018.15420014.256.125014.15831510.762.24001163.450012.870.263011.171.28001269.6100011.773.812501276.3160012.874.9200012.477.1250012.379.4315013.381.640001382.7500013.580.1630013.278800013.877.11000013.778.21250013.469.61600013.367.3SPL24.990.3N0.682.6median 13.2median 73.8Delta1836.246.130.739.625.643.926.742.836.743.624.644.317.64618.743.218.245.715.956.617.356.115.260.214.160.413.461.313.866.514.367.713.774.912.478.112.778.612.177.212.981.612.584.612.284.112.88413.18413.578.513.176.913.7741466.813.36425.2930.792.2median 13.5median 74.91.210.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 14 UltraSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 世界其他地区的电池容量较小

耗电量

小米 14 Ultra 的功耗相当低,尤其是在负载情况下的功耗相对较低。

Ultra 的电池容量为 5,000 mAh,只有在中国发布的机型采用了 5,300 mAh 电池。AIDA64 和 3C 电池管理器都显示这款智能手机的电池容量为 5,300 毫安时,这有点自相矛盾。不过,当被问及此事时,小米德国公司再次确认电池容量为 5,000 mAh。

在我们的测试中,这款智能手机的充电线功率可达 90 瓦,这意味着它在 40 分钟内就能充满电。仅用 17 分钟就充满了 50%,33 分钟就充满了 80%。此外,还可使用高达 80 瓦的无线充电和反向无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.22 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.8 / 0.89 / 0.91 Watt
Load midlight 8.99 / 9.01 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh
Honor Magic6 Pro
5600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh
Vivo X100 Pro
2700 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-21%
-31%
-49%
-5%
-20%
-22%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.63
21%
0.8
-0%
0.73
9%
0.46
42%
0.818 ?(0.51 - 1, n=9)
-2%
Idle Average *
0.89
1.47
-65%
1.32
-48%
1.22
-37%
0.92
-3%
1.196 ?(0.89 - 1.52, n=9)
-34%
Idle Maximum *
0.91
1.55
-70%
1.37
-51%
1.34
-47%
0.95
-4%
1.279 ?(0.91 - 1.6, n=9)
-41%
Load Average *
8.99
8.45
6%
11.62
-29%
16.52
-84%
11.72
-30%
Load Maximum *
9.01
8.63
4%
11.65
-29%
16.58
-84%
11.79
-31%
10.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=9)
-21%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516171819Tooltip
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.02 (0.821-8.96)
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.75 (0.1675-19.9)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.71 (0.596-0.848)
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.949 (0.822-1.242)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.83 (8.4-8.96)
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.5 (9.47-11.5)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.71 (0.596-0.848)
Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.949 (0.822-1.242)

运行时间

我们在启用 LTPO 的情况下测量了手机的电池续航时间。它们并没有完全反映出小米 14 Ultra 的低功耗特性,因为竞争对手的续航时间有时要长得多,尤其是在我们调整了显示屏亮度(150 cd/m²)的实际 Wi-Fi 测试中。不过,小米 14 Ultra 的续航时间还是非常不错的,即使在高强度使用的情况下,也能轻松度过一天。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 03min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 123)
12h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 35min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 11min
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh
Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh
Honor Magic6 Pro
5600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh
Vivo X100 Pro
2700 mAh
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
104%
11%
86%
50%
50%
38%
Reader / Idle
1983
3514
77%
1344
-32%
3519
77%
2227
12%
1729
-13%
H.264
1055
2013
91%
1122
6%
2027
92%
1922
82%
1010
-4%
WiFi v1.3
751
1163
55%
760
1%
1548
106%
1148
53%
1127
50%
1065
42%
Load
131
384
193%
220
68%
223
70%
202
54%
298
127%

Pros

+ 明亮准确的 LTPO 显示屏
+ 快速 USB 3.2 和 Wi-Fi 7
+ 快速充电
+ 良好的摄像头设置
+ 通过 IP68 认证

Cons

- 温度会很高
- 限制性系统
- 无 UWB
- 不支持 eSIM

结论--功能强大的整体解决方案,差距不大

小米 14 Ultra 评测。测试设备由德国小米公司和 notebooksbilliger.de 提供。
小米 14 Ultra 评测。测试设备由德国小米公司和 notebooksbilliger.de 提供。

小米 14 Ultra 是一款功能强大的高端智能手机,其突出之处主要在于它的拍照功能--然而,遗憾的是,它的功能也存在着这个价位不应该存在的差距。

小米拿出了重型武器--徕卡四摄像头,因为额外的镜头几乎不需要做出任何妥协,其画质也令人印象深刻。不过,该设置也存在一些不足之处:在使用杜比视界(Dolby Vision)时,您最多只能以 30fps 的速度录制视频,而且手机只会为 16:9 以外的宽高比生成剪切效果。它的图像防抖功能在长焦距拍摄时也会更好。

小米 14 Ultra 的目标是在相机质量方面设立新标准,尤其是在整体概念方面。然而,它无法在竞争中脱颖而出。

让我们感到惊讶的是,小米甚至没有提供 eSIM 卡,而是完全没有。UWB 也没有加入。这家中国公司似乎也还不想加入人工智能的行列。

即便如此,小米 14 Ultra 还是给人留下了深刻的印象:快速充电、红外爆破、Wi-Fi 7、良好的运行时间、快速的系统性能和较长的更新交付时间。如果您希望接收更新的时间更长,那么不妨看看 Galaxy S24 Ultra像素 8 Pro.手机 Magic6 Pro提供类似的完整相机配置。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

小米 14 Ultra 尚未在美国发售,但很快就可以通过小米官方商店和亚马逊等在线零售商订购。亚马逊等在线零售商订购。

Xiaomi 14 Ultra - 04/23/2024 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
71 / 70 → 100%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
94%
Games Performance
77 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
98 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
77%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
80%
Average
85%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米 14 Ultra 评测--徕卡手机的王牌之作
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-04-25 (Update: 2024-04-25)