屏蔽窥探 - 三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 评测

Name: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Brand: Samsung

保守秘密

在我们的测试中，三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 展示了其全新的隐私显示屏究竟带来了什么。我们测试了这款手机的性能、电池续航时间和性价比，以及三星 2026 旗舰手机是否不仅仅是昂贵的升级版。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 04/22/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Galaxy S Samsung Smartphone Touchscreen

三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 的评价

三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 是一款技术成熟的设备，但绝不是颠覆性的升级：三星将骁龙 8 Elite 5 代Galaxy 、Wi-Fi 7、USB 3.2、60 瓦充电和 5,000 毫安时电池整合到新手机中，虽然没有创造任何新纪录，但电池续航能力令人惊叹。

真正的附加值来自于新的隐私显示屏，它能有效降低侧视可视度，但根据不同的模式，屏幕亮度和色彩稳定性也会大大降低。这使得它在技术上很有吸引力，但在日常使用中，它很可能被证明是一种情景优势，而不是一种永久性的操作模式。

Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

除此之外，这款手机还支持长时间更新、功能强大的多功能摄像头以及集成的 S Pen，但与竞争对手相比，它在电池和摄像头方面的改进有限，因此整体印象略有下降。尽管如此，Galaxy S26 Ultra 仍然是一款功能非常强大的旗舰手机，适合那些追求最高配置、高性能和手机显示屏真正隐私优势的用户。另一方面，对于注重价格的买家或仍拥有前代机型且不急需升级的用户来说，它可能不是最划算的产品。

Pros

+ 精确显示

+ 隐私显示功能

+ 多功能摄像头设置

+ USB 3.2、UWB 和 Wi-Fi 7

+ 通过 IP68 认证

+ 集成 S Pen

Cons

- 低频 PWM 调光

- 缺少蓝牙音频编解码器

- 放在桌子上时晃动很大

价格和供应情况

您可以直接从Samsung 在线商店购买Galaxy S26 Ultra 的所有机型。.

此外，某些配置还可通过亚马逊订购。

$1,234.99
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Unlocked Android Smartphone, 512GB, Privacy Display, Galaxy AI, AI Camera, Super Fast Charging 3.0, Durable Battery, 2026, US 1 Year Warranty, Black
$1,044.99
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Unlocked Android Smartphone, 256GB, Privacy Display, Galaxy AI, AI Camera, Super Fast Charging 3.0, Durable Battery, 2026, US 1 Year Warranty, Cobalt Violet
$1,207.90
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Unlocked Android Smartphone, 512GB, Privacy Display, Galaxy AI, AI Camera, Super Fast Charging 3.0, Durable Battery, 2026, US 1 Year Warranty, White

三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 的评价
规格：三星Galaxy S26 Ultra
案例 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 更纤薄，但晃动更大
连接性 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 的存储容量高达 1 TB
软件 - 三星提供七年更新服务
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 高速无线局域网和 5G Sub-6
电话功能和通话质量
相机 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 具有良好的多功能设置
配件和保修 - Care+ 更注重每月订购模式
输入设备和操作 - 更纤薄的 S Pen
显示屏 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 配有新型隐私面板
性能 - S26 Ultra 内的骁龙 8 精英 5 代Galaxy
游戏 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 游戏功能强大
排放 - 酷，但性能受限
电池寿命 - 快速充电现在为 60 瓦
Notebookcheck 总评分
可能的替代品比较

三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 的目标是进一步提高Android 旗舰手机的标准。我们的测试很快显示，三星并没有将彻底改变作为目标，相反，制造商对手机的性能、显示屏和日常使用功能进行了有针对性的更新。此外，它现在还具有新的安全和舒适功能，如隐私显示功能。

与前代产品相比，S25 Ultra 的最大改进在于 Galaxy S25 Ultra的最大改进是进一步优化了峰值性能，配备了上述隐私显示屏，并提供了细致入微的用户体验。隐私显示屏尤其赋予了 S26 Ultra 独特的个性，其设计目的是在日常使用中更好地保护用户免受窥视。与此同时，这些微小而丰富的改进是否足以证明 Ultra 机型的高昂售价，我们拭目以待。

规格：三星Galaxy S26 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Galaxy S26 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy 8c/8t, 2 x 4.7 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Prime, 6 x 3.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Performance, Oryon v3

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 840, Core: 1300 MHz

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.90 inch 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 498 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Corning Gorilla Glass Armor 2, Privacy Display, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 222.8 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Magnetometer, Rotation, Proximity, Orientation, Barometer, OTG, UWB, DeX

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 163.6 x 78.1

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery Cycles: 1200

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 200 MPix (Samsung HP2, f/1.4, 23 mm, OIS) + 10 MPix (3x Tele, f/2.4, 69 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (5x Tele, f/2.9, 115 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (Ultra Wide / Macro, f/1.9, 13 mm); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, 23 / 30 mm, AF)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, SIM-Tool, USB-C-Cabel, One UI 8.5, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | Dual-eSIM | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 401.85 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: NTFS (only reading), FAT32, exFAT | Body-SAR: 1.352 W/kg, Head-SAR: 1.284 W/kg | max. charging speed: 60 W (wired) / 25 W (wireless), fanless, waterproof

Released

02/25/2026

Weight

214 g

Price

1449 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

案例 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 更纤薄，但晃动更大

三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 有钴紫、黑、天蓝和白四种颜色。此外，还有两种通过三星在线商店独家发售的颜色，即粉金和银影。手机边框为磨砂材质，但黑色和紫色机型背面的大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 吸附了大量指纹。

其表面处理非常出色。所有缝隙都紧密而均匀，当你试图扭动铠甲铝边框时，手机也不会发出任何声响或吱吱作响。91% 的屏占比堪称典范。该手机的标称机身高度仅为 7.9 毫米（我们测量的高度为 7.95 毫米），尽管尺寸不小，但拿在手里却感觉非常纤薄。不过，摄像头从机身背面突出了 4.5 毫米，这使得Galaxy S26 Ultra 放在桌子上时非常容易晃动。这妨碍了打字，尤其是在使用 S Pen 时。使用手机壳只能稍微缓解这一问题。

三星智能手机通过了 IP68 认证，具有防尘和防水功能。尽管重新采用了铝合金材质，而不是像在 S25 Ultra-S26 Ultra 却轻了 4 克。

尺寸比较

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Xiaomi 17 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Vivo X300 Pro Honor Magic8 Pro DIN A6 ❌

连接性 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 的存储容量高达 1 TB

三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 有三种存储版本：

12 / 256 GB，售价 1,299.99 美元（MRSP）
12 / 512 GB，售价 1,499.99 美元（MRSP）
16 / 1.024 GB，售价 1,799.99 美元（MRSP）

这意味着，虽然入门机型的价格没有上涨，但 512 GB 机型的价格上涨了 80 美元。1 TB 机型的价格甚至上涨了 140 美元，但它至少配备了更大的内存。

此外，三星还为新款手机配备了支持 Auracast 的现代蓝牙 6.0、NFC、UWB 和超高速 USB 3.2。在我们的拷贝测试中，USB 3.2 的速度几乎达到了 402 MB/s，而且还连接了三星便携式固态硬盘 T7-此外，它还支持有线图像输出。支持的文件系统除了 FAT32 和 exFAT 等常见格式外，还包括 NTFS。不过，使用 Windows 文件系统的连接存储设备只能被手机读取，而不能被写入。

S Pen 再次集成到手机外壳中。

软件 - 三星提供七年更新服务

Galaxy S26 Ultra 预装了谷歌Android 16 和三星 One UI 8.5，预计将在七年内（直到 2033 年 2 月 28 日）接受更新。

与往年一样，这款智能手机预装了 Spotify、Netflix、Facebook 和微软的第三方应用程序，不过它们都可以卸载。新加入的是 Perplexity。 Galaxy 人工智能也回来了，并增强了令人兴奋的新功能，如Now Nudge。同样值得称赞的是，可以完全在本地使用人工智能功能，但这会大大降低其速度，并可能限制其功能。

可持续性

除长期软件更新外，三星还为其智能手机提供维修计划。提供详细的维修说明，并可直接从三星公司购买更换部件。不过，在EPREL 数据库中，该设备的可修复性仅被评为 C 级。.

有关该智能手机的_二氧化碳排放量和可回收材料使用情况的信息比较详细，可在 Galaxy S26 Ultra 的可持续发展报告中查看。.

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 高速无线局域网和 5G Sub-6

不出所料，这款三星智能手机支持所有三个频段的 Wi-Fi 7，并在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器进行的测试中提供了令人印象深刻的稳定传输速度。

此外，Galaxy S26 Ultra 还支持当前所有的移动网络标准，包括 5G Sub-6，并支持宽频带。这应能确保在所有国家实现无缝连接，即使其支持的频段列表并不详尽。例如，它缺少 5G 频段 N79，但这应该不会有什么影响。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	946 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	927 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1844 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1619 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼90%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	910 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	459 (min: 411) MBit/s ∼29%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1375 (min: 1300) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1180 (min: 1117) MBit/s ∼65%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	959 (min: 636) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1595 (min: 953) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	922 (min: 721) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1697 (min: 1513) MBit/s ∼94%
Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	976 (min: 951) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	580 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1856 (min: 1812) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	791 (min: 773) MBit/s ∼44%
Vivo X300 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	977 (min: 956) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	917 (min: 834) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1866 (min: 1793) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1806 (min: 1725) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼82%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1053 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1257 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1468 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	694 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	738 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1279 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼78%

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1813 (911-1876)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1375 (1300-1419)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1618 (1324-1681)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1180 (1117-1218)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø930 (475-968)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø910 (769-1042)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (879-939)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø459 (411-477)

三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 支持至少两个频段的所有全球卫星通信系统。它在室外可以快速准确地获取卫星信号，但在室内则需要较长的时间，智能手机有时需要一些时间才能锁定用户的准确位置。

在一次骑行中，我们比较了 S26 Ultra 和 Garmin Venu 2 的定位服务。在开阔地带，智能手表能更准确地跟踪我们的路线，更新位置的频率也更高。而在城市地区，智能手机的表现则更好。无论如何，Galaxy 手机都能提供非常好的位置跟踪功能。

电话功能和通话质量

三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 可以使用两张 nano-SIM 卡或两张 eSIM 卡，也可以混合使用。在我们的测试中，Wi-Fi 通话、VoLTE 和 Vo5G 等标准都得到了支持，并且运行稳定。

将手机放在耳边时，通话质量非常好，而且具有有效的噪音抑制功能，这意味着 S26 Ultra 用户即使在嘈杂的环境中也能听得懂。手机的扬声器音质不错，但听起来有点刺耳，因此用户的声音会有点闷。

除了实时 AI 电话翻译外，三星手机现在还提供转录功能。

相机 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 具有良好的多功能设置

三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 的前置摄像头分辨率再次达到 1200 万像素，并具有自动对焦功能。视频最高可录制成 60fps 的超高清格式。使用该镜头拍摄的照片色彩表现不错，但锐化有点过度。

手机背面的主设置使用了与前几年相同的 2 亿像素传感器，但由于采用了 f/1.4 光圈，感光度更高。5 倍光学变焦的变化比预期的要大：虽然该摄像头的分辨率仍为 5000 万像素，但现在采用了更大的光圈（f/2.9），而且不再使用传统的潜望式变焦。相反，三星采用了 ALoP 变焦技术。采用这种技术时，镜头位于镜面前方，镜面将光线重新定向到传感器上；而在传统的潜望镜变焦技术中，镜头的排列是相反的。这使得设计更加紧凑，并允许在更轻薄的智能手机中使用更大的镜头。最不明显的变化是该设备的 3 倍光学变焦，据说配备了新的传感器，但仍只有 1000 万像素。

三星相机的画质非常出色，仍然是智能手机中画质最好的相机之一。尤其是在多功能性方面，Galaxy S26 Ultra 配备齐全。它的超广角镜头具有微距拍摄功能，焦距为 13 毫米，数码变焦范围可达 2300 毫米。在这两者之间，手机的光学变焦范围包括 23、69 和 115 毫米，以及通过传感器裁剪的 46 和 230 毫米，几乎没有质量损失。尽管 3 倍变焦的分辨率仍然很低，但与 S25 Ultra 使用的传感器相比，图像质量有了明显改善。 Galaxy S25 Ultra.图像构图本身非常均衡，色彩平衡也很好。尽管如此，在弱光环境下，拍摄对象往往会显得过于冷淡，有时还会略带黄色。此外，三星倾向于过度锐化物体和轮廓，偶尔会丢失一些细节。

Galaxy Store 上的相机助手和Expert RAW应用程序进一步扩展了相机的功能和设置选项。在视频功能方面，三星同样处于有利地位，提供从 720p 到 8K 的各种分辨率。8K 分辨率只能达到 30fps，而且在光学和防抖方面有一定的限制，而超高清分辨率则灵活得多，允许用户以高达 120fps 的速度拍摄。三星专有的 APV 格式还提供未压缩的 LOG 视频录制。由于这需要更多的存储空间，视频可以直接保存到连接的存储设备中。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Ultra-wide angle 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

在可控光照条件下，三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 能准确再现色彩，印证了我们对这款手机的主观印象。

即便如此，测试图的图像在画面中央明显锐化，边缘的像差也很小。

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: 3.04 ∆E min: 0.75 - max: 9.69 ∆E

配件和保修 - Care+ 更注重每月订购模式

不出所料，三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 的配件非常少：薄薄的包装盒里只有一根 USB 数据线和一个 SIM 卡弹出工具。手机壳、充电器和其他配件可直接从三星或第三方供应商处选购。

手机享有 12 个月的标准保修服务。希望为三星智能手机购买额外保险的用户可以选择 Samsung Care+。根据保险范围的不同，每月费用约为 10 美元或 15 美元。较贵的计划不仅包括智能手机的损坏，还包括被盗。另外，Care+ 可以作为两年期合同购买，固定价格为 199 美元或 279 美元。

输入设备和操作 - 更纤薄的 S Pen

Galaxy S26 Ultra 的电容式触摸屏可实现精确输入，使用起来感觉流畅、反应灵敏。它没有预装屏幕保护膜。显示屏内置的超声波指纹传感器反应迅速、可靠。此外，用户还可以选择使用前置摄像头进行安全性较低的面部识别。个人数据受到三星专用安全平台 Knox 的保护。

手机的线性振动电机可提供愉悦的触觉反馈，并可在设置中进行大量定制。这不仅适用于振动强度，还适用于您希望激活的区域。侧边的功能键对于左撇子和右撇子用户来说都很方便，而且还可以自定义。

S Pen 再次直接集成到 Ultra 中，并提供与 S25 Ultra机型一样。因此，任何希望触控笔再次支持蓝牙功能的人都会感到失望。由于 S Pen 变得更加纤薄，用户握在手中并不那么舒适，但它仍然非常适合书写--前提是下面晃动的智能手机不会太碍事。

显示屏 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 配有新型隐私面板

三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 的 AMOLED 显示屏尺寸为 6.9 英寸（17.5 厘米），分辨率高达 WQHD+，但必须首先在设置中激活。由于采用了 LTPO 技术，其刷新率可在 1 Hz 和 120 Hz 之间自动调节。虽然不支持杜比视界，但也支持 HDR。

手机显示屏的亮度与前代产品相当。虽然部分亮度低于同类产品，但仍有可能达到很高的水平。值得注意的是它的最低亮度，使用额外的调光功能可低至 0.46 cd/m²。在 PWM 调光方面，三星没有做出任何改变，因此面板仍然会以相对较低的频率闪烁。这可能会引起敏感用户的不适。


1378 cd/m²	1365 cd/m²	1410 cd/m²
1373 cd/m²	1339 cd/m²	1403 cd/m²
1378 cd/m²	1356 cd/m²	1424 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1424 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1380.7 cd/m² Minimum: 0.94 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 1339 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
97.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.05
CCT: 6498 K

	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"	Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"	Xiaomi 17 Ultra AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"	Honor Magic8 Pro OLED, 2808x1256, 6.7"	Vivo X300 Pro AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"
Screen		3%	15%	23%	15%	-13%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1339	1054 -21%	1303 -3%	1809 35%	1574 18%	1357 1%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1381	1059 -23%	1300 -6%	1821 32%	1562 13%	1350 -2%
Brightness Distribution (%)	94	93 -1%	98 4%	95 1%	93 -1%	94 0%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.5	1.57 37%	1.12 55%	1.2 52%	1.3 48%	3.1 -24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.8	2.8 26%	2.25 41%	2.9 24%	2.7 29%	4.7 -24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	1.7 -0%	1.7 -0%	1.8 -6%	2 -18%	2.2 -29%
Gamma	2.05 ^107%	2.32 ^95%	2.242 ^98%	2.22 ^99%	2.26 ^97%	2 ^110%
CCT	6498 ^100%	6993 ^93%	6404 ^101%	6446 ^101%	6709 ^97%	6391 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3528 cd/m² +30%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3233 cd/m² +19%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2713 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2613 cd/m² -4%
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2329 cd/m² -14%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6045 cd/m² +103%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3648 cd/m² +23%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2975 cd/m²
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2785 cd/m² -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2768 cd/m² -7%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz
Amplitude: 13.99 %
Secondary Frequency: 480 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7901 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

以固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置进行的系列测量（虽然在最低亮度下振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是由于缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

Galaxy S26 Ultra 的主要新功能是隐私显示功能，该功能可将屏幕边缘的像素变暗，使旁观者无法看到显示屏上的内容。该功能可通过两个级别进行调节，而且不必适用于整个显示屏；相反，它可以仅限于通知或密码输入等。

在日常使用中，这通常效果很好。隐私显示可降低对比度和亮度。例如，如果正常使用时显示屏的亮度为 1,000 cd/m²，那么启用隐私显示功能后，亮度将降至 645 cd/m²（最高：636 cd/m²）。一直使用它意义不大，但在某些情况下，它确实是一笔宝贵的财富。

Galaxy S26 Ultra 在选择 "自然 "配置文件时的色彩还原非常出色，比上一代产品更好。如果坚持使用默认设置，显示屏会略微偏冷。

启用 "隐私显示 "后，屏幕的色彩准确度会降低，显示效果略显暗淡。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.5915 ms rise
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.6615 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.84 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.451 ms rise
0.84 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.3885 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms).

在户外，Galaxy S26 Ultra 给人留下了深刻的印象。大猩猩玻璃不反光，即使在阳光直射下，屏幕也能保持最高亮度。

即使启动了手动亮度控制，显示屏也依然清晰易读。虽然 411 cd/m² 的亮度相对较低，但使用 "额外亮度"选项可将亮度提升至 652 cd/m²。

在正常情况下，三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 的可视角度稳定性确实不错，但在更大的可视角度下，我们注意到亮度有所下降，显示屏的色调明显变冷。

性能 - S26 Ultra 内的骁龙 8 精英 5 代Galaxy

Galaxy S26 Ultra 由一个 Galaxy 版本版本的骁龙8第五代精英版.该版本的 CPU 最高时钟速度略高，GPU 运行速度也略高。

遗憾的是，三星未能将这一优势转化为性能优势，这要归功于手机的散热系统，因为三星显然更注重保持较低的表面温度。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	3883 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	3759 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	3759 Points 0%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3722 Points -1%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	3718 Points -1%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	3562 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3200 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=192, last 2 years)	1806 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	11411 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	11337 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	11337 Points 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	11301 Points 0%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	10615 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10020 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	10017 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=192, last 2 years)	5363 Points -53%

Antutu v11 - Score
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3953784 Points +2%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	3905375 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	3882009 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	3882009 Points 0%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	3500521 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (584158 - 4273120, n=28, last 2 years)	2431334 Points -37%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	22179 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	20764 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	19499 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	19499 Points 0%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	18697 Points -4%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	17480 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=156, last 2 years)	15118 Points -22%

CrossMark - Overall
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2722 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	2543 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	2543 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2354 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=104, last 2 years)	1204 Points -53%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	15734 Points +32%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	14611 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	13325 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	11953 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	11953 Points 0%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	10620 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=126, last 2 years)	7856 Points -34%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	Points -100%
System
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	20567 Points +18%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	20150 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	17435 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	17435 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17171 Points -2%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	15639 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=126, last 2 years)	11509 Points -34%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	Points -100%
Memory
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	22887 Points +112%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	18561 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17355 Points +61%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	13155 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	10780 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	10780 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=126, last 2 years)	8982 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	Points -100%
Graphics
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	51642 Points +9%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	51366 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	47299 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	47299 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	45562 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=126, last 2 years)	27223 Points -42%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	26660 Points -44%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	Points -100%
Web
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2587 Points +13%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2358 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2322 Points +1%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	2319 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	2297 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	2297 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=126, last 2 years)	1732 Points -25%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	Points -100%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	25289 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	25289 Points 0%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	24002 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	23281 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=114, last 2 years)	20390 Points -19%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	19373 Points -23%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	37611 Points +1712%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=92, last 2 years)	17599 Points +748%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	2076 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	2076 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1923 Points -7%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1878 Points -10%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	1620 Points -22%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	5155 Points +632%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	843 Points +20%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	768 Points +9%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	733 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=92, last 2 years)	716 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	704 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	704 Points 0%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	36297 Points +5246%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=92, last 2 years)	2917 Points +330%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	843 Points +24%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	757 Points +11%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	718 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	679 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	679 Points 0%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	48828 Points +3091%
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=92, last 2 years)	4282 Points +180%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	1986 Points +30%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1769 Points +16%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	1631 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	1530 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	1530 Points 0%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=32, last 2 years)	586 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	240 Points
Score V6
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	22780 Points +8%
Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	21660 Points +3%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	21143 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	21071 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	21071 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10621 Points -50%
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=79, last 2 years)	5241 Points -75%

图形处理由 Adreno 840负责图形处理，它支持所有现代应用程序接口，性能卓越。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8102 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8053 Points
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7629 Points -5%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7087 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6907 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	5959 Points -26%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8072 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7735 Points
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7582 Points -2%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7098 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6845 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	6033 Points -22%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	30624 Points
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	30187 Points -1%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	30166 Points -1%
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	26944 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26614 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	26375 Points -14%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14869 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14321 Points
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14225 Points -1%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12911 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12395 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	11776 Points -18%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	15420 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14525 Points
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14331 Points -1%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12895 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12711 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	12447 Points -14%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3208 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3088 Points
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3081 Points 0%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2823 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	2588 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2397 Points -22%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3253 Points +5%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3101 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3084 Points
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2796 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	2679 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2651 Points -14%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	937 fps +15%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	917 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	813 fps
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	748 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	713 fps -12%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	711 fps -13%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	531 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	489 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	472 fps -3%
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	441 fps -10%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	429 fps -12%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	410 fps -16%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	399 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	385 fps
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	346 fps -10%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	288 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	284 fps -26%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	282 fps -27%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	121 fps +14%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +13%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	106 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	104 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -43%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	239 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	214 fps
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	207 fps -3%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	201 fps -6%
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	193 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	161 fps -25%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	121 fps +11%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +10%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	109 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	100 fps -8%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -45%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	127 fps
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	127 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps -6%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	119 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	86 fps -32%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	367 fps +3%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	361 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	355 fps
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	322 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	247 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	237 fps -33%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	62 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	58 fps -2%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	55 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps -12%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	36.4 fps -38%

我们已经预料到浏览网页时会有很高的性能，但Galaxy S26 Ultra 的速度现在首次超过了 iPhone iPhone，这证明了软件的出色优化。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	423 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	422.954 Points
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	358.295 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	315.056 Points -26%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)	304.63 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 423, n=124, last 2 years)	155.4 Points -63%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	733 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	733 runs/min 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	643 runs/min -12%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)	500 runs/min -32%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	425 runs/min -42%
Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=95, last 2 years)	242 runs/min -67%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	45.5 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	45.5 runs/min 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	42.8 runs/min -6%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (Chrome 143)	31.4 runs/min -31%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	29.3 runs/min -36%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)	27.6 runs/min -39%
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=107, last 2 years)	15 runs/min -67%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)	126661 Points +20%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	121337 Points +15%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (Chrome 143)	118347 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	105762 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	105762 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	99202 Points -6%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)	96438 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=160, last 2 years)	50382 Points -52%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=134, last 2 years)	1094 ms * -286%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	376.8 ms * -33%
Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)	373.8 ms * -32%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (Chrome 143)	295.6 ms * -4%
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)	284.4 ms * -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (n=1)	284 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	283.6 ms *
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	256.9 ms * +9%

* ... smaller is better

三星再次采用 UFS 4.0 存储技术，导致写入速度降低。不过，在日常使用中，这一点应该不会很明显。

	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra	Xiaomi 17 Ultra	Honor Magic8 Pro	Vivo X300 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra	Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		78%	78%	31%	31%	31%	1%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3626.09	3987.92 10%	3942.69 9%	2041.82 -44%	3823.28 5%	3626 ?(1493 - 4384, n=53) 0%	2207 ?(270 - 4370, n=175, last 2 years) -39%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	1658.91	3974.23 140%	3732.81 125%	1981.85 19%	3361.24 103%	2659 ?(555 - 3484, n=53) 60%	1883 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=175, last 2 years) 14%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	513.44	547.56 7%	488.67 -5%	320.25 -38%	287.85 -44%	382 ?(218 - 513, n=53) -26%	302 ?(47.6 - 614, n=175, last 2 years) -41%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	207.16	524.05 153%	587.11 183%	593.74 187%	331.61 60%	396 ?(50.7 - 989, n=53) 91%	354 ?(9.4 - 1071, n=175, last 2 years) 71%

游戏 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 游戏功能强大

Galaxy S26 Ultra 可轻松应对各类游戏。

我们使用GameBench 验证了这一点，即使是《PUBG》也能在 Ultra 设置下以稳定的 60fps 运行。.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø59.5 (47-60)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø59.8 (53-60)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø118.4 (112-120)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø89.1 (80-91)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø59.7 (53-60)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra; Subway Surfers: Ø119.7 (113-120)

排放 - 酷，但性能受限

温度

在负载情况下，Galaxy S26 Ultra 的表面温度在我们的测试中仅在少数区域超过 41 °C，这使它成为一款相对低温的设备。

不过，正如我们的压力测试所显示的那样，这是以持续负载下性能的显著降低为代价的。

Max. Load

Idle


40.6 °C	40.3 °C	38.5 °C
41 °C	40.1 °C	37.7 °C
40.6 °C	40.8 °C	36.8 °C

Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 39.6 °C


39.1 °C	42.1 °C	39.5 °C
38.6 °C	41.5 °C	43.7 °C
36.7 °C	40.9 °C	41.8 °C

Maximum: 43.7 °C
Average: 40.4 °C

Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	99.8 % +94%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	67.4 % +31%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.9 % +7%
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	52.3 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.4 %
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	50 % -3%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	73 % +35%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	71.8 % +33%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52.3 % -3%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	50.7 % -6%
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	50.3 % -7%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	72.6 % +34%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	70.5 % +30%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.2 %
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	51.6 % -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49.7 % -8%
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	49.5 % -9%
Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	80.6 % +3%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78.5 %
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	64.8 % -17%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	63.5 % -19%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	43.3 % -45%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	72.6 % +26%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	64.7 % +13%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.5 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	50.6 % -12%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	48.4 % -16%
Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	47 % -18%

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø30.3 (25.3-46.9)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø25 (22.7-31.7)

Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø34.6 (31.2-42.7)

Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø27.3 (21.9-43.5)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø31.3 (25.1-46.4)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø29.3 (26.6-36.7)

Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø34.7 (30-42.5)

Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø29.1 (23.9-48.2)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø15.5 (13-22.6)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.2 (12.6-19.5)

Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø17.4 (14.7-20.3)

Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø14 (11-23.3)

发言人

三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 的扬声器音质悦耳，但稍显乏力，尤其是低频部分。

音频可通过 USB、Auracast 或蓝牙输出，后者仅支持有限的编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 快速充电现在为 60 瓦

耗电量

在大多数情况下，手机的功耗通常都很低。在我们以调整亮度水平进行的测试中，其温度控制的效果有时会很明显。

S26 Ultra 现在支持高达 60 瓦的有线充电。这意味着其 5000 毫安时电池充满电所需时间不到一小时。智能手机的无线充电功率可达 25 瓦。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.05 / 0.21 Watt
Idle	0.56 / 1.18 / 1.33 Watt
Load	14.91 / 16.58 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 4823 mAh	Xiaomi 17 Ultra 6800 mAh	Honor Magic8 Pro 6270 mAh	Vivo X300 Pro 5440 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		13%	8%	26%	-30%	15%	0%	-3%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.56	0.6 -7%	0.8 -43%	0.58 -4%	0.86 -54%	0.55 2%	0.56 ?(n=1) -0%	0.869 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=141, last 2 years) -55%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.18	1.3 -10%	1.1 7%	0.74 37%	1.8 -53%	0.77 35%	1.18 ?(n=1) -0%	1.455 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=141, last 2 years) -23%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.33	1.6 -20%	1.2 10%	0.75 44%	1.86 -40%	0.91 32%	1.33 ?(n=1) -0%	1.641 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=141, last 2 years) -23%
Load Average * (Watt)	14.91	4.1 73%	6.1 59%	11.35 24%	10.63 29%	13.81 7%	14.9 ?(n=1) -0%	6.77 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=111, last 2 years) 55%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	16.58	11.5 31%	15.3 8%	11.87 28%	21.99 -33%	16.69 -1%	16.6 ?(n=1) -0%	11.3 ?(4.75 - 22, n=111, last 2 years) 32%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.66 (1.309-16.6)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.44 (0.757-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.853 (0.784-1.211)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.689 (0.646-0.893)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.9 (3.12-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.9 (12.7-16.6)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.853 (0.784-1.211)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.689 (0.646-0.893)

运行时间

竞争对手通常使用硅碳技术的更大容量电池--我们解释了三星尚未采用这种技术的原因。在这篇文章中.

该设备的续航时间比上一代机型要短，但总体来说仍然非常不错。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		50h 53min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 146)		17h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		30h 55min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 41min

	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 4823 mAh	Xiaomi 17 Ultra 6800 mAh	Honor Magic8 Pro 6270 mAh	Vivo X300 Pro 5440 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh
Battery runtime		60%	32%	50%	-15%	5%
Reader / Idle (h)	50.9		52.1 2%		39.8 -22%	45.8 -10%
H.264 (h)	30.9		35.2 14%			32.3 5%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	17.9	28.6 60%	25.9 45%	26.9 50%	17.9 0%	22.2 24%
Load (h)	3.7		6.2 68%		2.9 -22%	3.7 0%

Notebookcheck 总评分

Galaxy S26 Ultra 是一款技术先进、功能强大的旗舰设备，其隐私显示功能为其带来了真正的附加价值；然而，只有真正充分利用这一安全功能和设备强大的整体功能的用户才会真正相信其高昂的价格。

SamsungGalaxy S26 Ultra 评测。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。

Back to the verdict

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra - 04/19/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

94%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

71 / 69 → 100%

Weight

88%

Battery

91%

Display

93%

Games Performance

41 / 55 → 75%

Application Performance

89 / 85 → 100%

AI Performance

44%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

84 / 90 → 93%

Camera

88%

Average

84%

90%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
90%

Materials
70%

Packaging
95%

Power Use
97%

Repairability
80%

Software Updates
100%

Total Sustainability Score: 88.7%

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 89.8%	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: List Price: 1449€	214 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.90" 3120x1440 498 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
2. 89.2%	Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro ⎘ Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe	Amazon: List Price: 1449 Euro	233 g	256 GB NVMe	6.90" 2868x1320 460 PPI OLED
3. 90.4%	Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $464.00 XIAOMI Redmi Note 15 Pro+ Pl... 2. $1,234.99 Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Un... 3. $939.99 OnePlus 15, 16GB RAM + 512GB... List Price: 950€	224 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED
4. 89.3%	Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $990.00 HONOR Magic7 Pro Dual-SIM 51... 2. $11.99 Ibywind for Honor Magic8 Pro... 3. $13.59 QUIETIP Magnetic Case for Ho... List Price: 1300€	219 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.71" 2808x1256 458 PPI OLED
5. 88.1%	Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: List Price: 1399€	226 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.78" 2800x1260 453 PPI AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!

屏蔽窥探 - 三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 评测

保守秘密

三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 的评价

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格：三星Galaxy S26 Ultra

案例 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 更纤薄，但晃动更大

尺寸比较

连接性 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 的存储容量高达 1 TB

软件 - 三星提供七年更新服务

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 高速无线局域网和 5G Sub-6

电话功能和通话质量

相机 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 具有良好的多功能设置

配件和保修 - Care+ 更注重每月订购模式

输入设备和操作 - 更纤薄的 S Pen

显示屏 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 配有新型隐私面板

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - S26 Ultra 内的骁龙 8 精英 5 代Galaxy

游戏 -Galaxy S26 Ultra 游戏功能强大

排放 - 酷，但性能受限

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra audio analysis

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max audio analysis

电池寿命 - 快速充电现在为 60 瓦

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

运行时间

Notebookcheck 总评分

可能的替代品比较

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles